throbber

`

`Editor: Donna Balado
`Managing Editor: jennifer Schmidt
`Marketing Manager: Christine Kushner
`
`Copyright © 1999 Lippincott Wllliams & Wilkins
`
`351 West Camden Street
`Baltimore, Maryland 21201—2436 USA
`
`227 East Washington Square
`Philadelphia, PA 19106
`
`All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be re-
`produced in any form or by any means, including photocopying, or utilized by any infor—
`mation storage and retrieval system'without written permission from the copyright owner.
`
`The publisher is not responsible (as a matter of product liability, negligence, or otherwise)
`for any injury resulting from any material contained herein. This publication contains in—
`formation relating to general principles of medical care which should not be construed as
`specific instructions for individual patients. Manufacturers’product information and pack—
`age inserts should be reviewed for current information, including contraindications,
`dosages, and precautions.
`
`Printed in the United States ofAmerica
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`
`Ansel, Howard C., 1933—
`Pharmaceutical dosage forms and drug delievery systems / Howard C.
`Ansel, Lode. Allen, Jr, Nicholas G. Popovich. —— 7th ed.
`p.
`cm.
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 0—683—30572—7
`2. Drug delivery systems.
`1. Drugs—Dosage forms.
`11. Popovich, Nicholas G.
`III. Title.
`[DNLM: 1. Dosage Forms.
`2. Drug Delivery Systems, QV 785 A618i 1999]
`RS200.A57
`1999
`615’.1—dc21
`DNLM/DLC
`for Library of Congress
`
`1. Allen, Lode.
`
`99—17498
`CIP
`
`The publishers have made every effort to trace the copyright holders for borrowed material. Ifthey
`have inadvertently overlooked any, they will be pleased to make the necessary arrangements at
`the first opportunity.
`-
`
`The use of portions of the text of USP23/NF18, copyright 1994, is by permission of the USP
`Convention, Inc. The Convention is not responsible for any inaccuracy of quotation or for
`any false or misleading implication that may arise from separation of excerpts from the
`original context or by obsolescence resulting from publication of a supplement.
`
`To purchase additional copies of this book call our customer service department at (800)
`638—3030 or fax orders to (301) 824—7390. International customers should call (301)
`714—2324.
`
`99 00 01 02
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2097 p. 2
`
`

`

`
`
`Contents
`
`Preface
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`Section I. PRINCIPLES OF DOSAGE FORM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
`
`I
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Introduction to Drugs and Pharmacy
`
`New Drug Development and Approval Process
`
`Dosage Form Design: Pharmaceutic and
`Formulation Considerations
`'
`
`Dosage Form Design: Biopharmaceutic and
`Pharmacokinetic Considerations
`
`Current Good Manufacturing Practices and Good
`Compounding Practices
`
`Section II. SOLID DOSAGE FORMS AND MODIFIED-RELEASE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`Powders and Granules
`
`Capsules and Tablets
`
`‘
`
`Modified~Release Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems
`
`Section III. SEMI-SOLID AND TRANSDERMAL SYSTEMS
`
`9
`
`IO
`
`Ointments, Creams, and Gels
`
`Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
`
`v
`
`vii
`
`1
`
`23
`
`60
`
`101
`
`142
`
`164
`
`179
`
`229
`
`_
`
`'244
`
`263
`
`ix'
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2097 p. 3
`
`

`

`x
`
`Contents
`
`Section IV. PHARMAEEUTICAL INSERTS
`
`II
`
`Suppositories and Inserts
`
`Section V. LIQUID DOSAGE FORMS
`
`I 2
`
`I3
`
`S olutions
`
`Disperse Systems
`
`Section VI. STERILE DOSAGE FORMS AND DELIVERY SYSTEMS
`
`I 4
`
`I 5
`
`I6
`
`Parenterals
`
`Biologicals
`
`Ophthalmic Solutions and Suspensions
`
`Section VII. NOVEL AND ADVANEED DOSAGE FORMS, DELIVERY SYSTEMS, AND DEVIEES
`
`Radiopharmaceuticals
`
`Products of Biotechnology
`
`Novel Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Technologies
`
`Systems and Techniques of Pharmaceutical Measurement
`
`I 7
`
`I8
`
`I9
`
`Appendix
`
`Index
`
`279
`
`296
`
`346
`
`397
`
`450
`
`469
`
`487
`
`503
`
`535
`
`552
`
`563
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2097 p. 4
`
`

`

`DISPERSE SYSTEMS
`
`
`
`Chapter at a Glance
`
`Suspensions
`Reasons for Suspensions
`Features Desired in a. Pharmaceutical
`Suspension
`Physical Foal-ores of the Dispersed Phase of
`a Suspension Dispersion Medium
`Preparation of Suspensions
`Sustained-Release Suspensions
`Extemporaneous Compounding of
`Suspensions
`Packaging and Storage of Suspensions
`Examples of Oral Suspmsiom
`Aniacid Oral Suspensions
`Antibacterial Oral Suspensions
`Examples of Other Suspensions
`Otis Suspensions
`Rectal SuSpensions
`Dry Powders for Oral Suspension
`Emulsions
`Purpose of Emulsions and. of
`Emulsificafion
`Theories of Emulsification
`Preparation of Emulsions
`Emulmfling Agents
`The HLB S stem
`Methods qyfimulsion Preparation
`Continental or Dry Gum Method
`English or Wet Gum Method
`Bottle or Forbes Battle Method
`Auxiliary Methods
`In Situ Soap Method
`Microemulsions
`Stability of Emulsions
`Aggregation and Coalesceme
`Examples of Oral Emulsions
`Mineral Oil Emulsion
`Castor Oil Emulsion
`Simethicone Emulsion
`
`345
`
`Gels and Mag-mas
`Colloidal Dispersions
`Terminology Related to Gels
`Classification and Types of Gels
`Preparation of Magmas and Gels
`Examples of Ceiling Agents
`Gel Formulation Considerations
`Examples of Magrrlas and Gels
`Bentonfle Magma, NF
`Aluminum Hydroxide Gel, USP
`Milk ofMagnesia, LISP
`Starch Glycerile
`Lubricating Jelly Pomula
`Clear Aqueous Gel with Dimhimne
`Poloxamer Gel Base
`Proper Administration and Use of
`Disperse Systems
`Aerosols
`AdVantages of the Aerosol Dosage
`Form
`The Aerosol Principle
`Aerosol Systems
`Two-phase Systems
`Three—phase Systems
`Cammssed Gas Systems
`Aerosol Container and Valve Assembly
`Containers
`Valve Assembly
`Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIS)
`Filling Operations
`Cold Filling
`Pressure Filling
`Testing the Filled Containers
`Packaging, Labeling, and Storage
`Pro
`Administration and Use of
`maceutical Aerosols
`Tapical Aerosols
`Vaginal and Rectal Aerosols
`
`AstraZencca Exhibit 2097 p. 5
`
`

`

`11-55 .CHAPI'ER includes the main types of liquid
`preparations containing undissolved or immiscible
`drug distributed throughout a vehicle. In these
`Preparations, the substance distributed is referred
`to as the dispersed phase and the vehicle is termed
`the dispersing phase or dispersion medium. 'lbgether,
`they produce a dispersed system.
`The particles of the dispersed phase are usually
`solid materials that are insoluble in the
`medium. In the case of emulsions. the dispersed
`phase is a liquid substance which is neither soluble
`no: miscible with the liquid of the dispersing phase.
`The emulsificationprocess resxdtsirr the dispersion of
`liquid drug as fine droplets throughout the dispersing
`phase.l11tlrecase ofan aerosolthedispersedphase
`may be air thatis present as small bubbles throughout
`a solution or an emulsion. Dispersions also consist of
`droplets ofa liquid (solution orsuspension)
`The particles of the dispersecl phase Vary widely
`in sizefrom large particles visible to the naked eye
`down to particles of colloidal dimension, falling be-
`tween 1.0 nm and 0.5 pm in size. Dispersions con-
`touring coarse particles. usually 10—50 urn in siza.
`are referred to as coarse dispersions and include the
`nopensions and emulsions. Dispersions containing
`particles of smaller sine are termed fine dispersions
`(as-10 um). and, lithe particles are in the colloidal
`range. mlloidol dispersions. Mgmas and gels repre—
`sent such fine dispersions.
`Largely because of their greater size. dispersed
`particles in a coarse dispersion hate a greater ten-
`dency to separate tram the dispersion medium than
`do the particles of a fine dispersion. Most solids in
`dispersion tend to settle to the bottom of the con—
`tainer because of their greater density than the dis-
`persion medium, whereas most emulsified liquids
`for oral use are oils and generally have a leSSer den-
`siiythan the aqueous mediuminwhich theyare dis
`persed and tend to rise toward the top of the prepa-
`ration. Complete and uniform redistribution of the
`di5persed phase is essential to the aourrate adminis-
`tration of unifonn doses. For a properly prepared
`dispersion,
`this should be accomplished by the
`moderate agitation of the container.
`The locusofthischapterisondispersionso!
`drugs administered orally or topicallyJI‘he same ba-
`sic pharmaceutical characteristics apply to those dis-
`persion systems administered by other routes of ad-.
`mnustrsfion. Included among these are ophthalmic
`suspensions, and sterile suspensions for injection.
`
`Suspensions
`
`Dispose Systems
`
`347
`
`as the SWM) disuibuted somewhat uniformly
`throughout a vehicle in which the drug eidu'bits a
`minimum degree of solubility Some suspensions
`are available in ready-to-use form—that is, already
`dislributed through a liquid vel'dcle With or Mthout
`stabilizers and other phaonaceutical additives (fig.
`13.1). Other proparations are available as dry pow~
`clots intended forsuspensionsin liquidvehicles.This
`type ofproduct generally is a powder rnixnire con-
`taining the drug and suitable suspending and dis-
`persing agents. which upon dilution and agitafion
`with a specified quantity of vehicle (generally puri-
`fied water) results in the formation of a suspension
`suitable for administration. Figure 13.2 demon-
`strates the preparation of this type of product. Drug
`that are unstable it maintained for attended periods
`of timein the presence ofan aqueousvehicle (for ex-
`ample. rnany antibiotic drugs) are most frequently
`supplied as dry powder moms for reconstitution
`at the time of dispensingThis type of preparation is
`designatedintheUSPbyatitieofthe fiorm“...for
`Oral Suspension"Prepared suspensions not requir-
`ing reconstitution at the time of dispensing are sim-
`ply designated as“. . . Oral Suspension.”
`
`Reasons for Suspensions
`
`There are several reasons for preparing mispen-
`sions. For one thing, certain drugs are chemically un—
`stable when in solution but stable when suspended.
`lninslamessudrasttmmesuspensioniosures
`chemical stability while pen-hitting liquid therapy. For
`many patients, the liquid form is preferred over the
`solidlounofthesarne drugbecausedthe easeof
`swallowingliquid's and [he fierdbilny in the adminis-
`tradonofarangeofdoses.’lhisisparticularlyadvan—
`tageous forkrfantsmhildren andthe elderly.'1he dis-
`advantage of a disagreeable taste of certain drugs
`
`
`
`Suspensions may be defined as preparations con-
`taining finely dirdded drug particles (referred to
`
`Fig. 13.1 Examples ofsome memorial oral Suspension
`
`AstraZencoa Exhibit 2097 p. 6
`
`

`

`341B
`
`Disperse Systems
`
`
`
`Fig. 13.2 Commercial mmbiotic preparationfir oral suspen-
`sionfiliowfng reconstitution with purified water. On the left is
`the dry powder mixture, and on the right the suspension afier
`fermentation with the specified amount ofpunfied water:
`
`when given in solution form is overcome when the
`drug is administered as undissolved particles of an
`oral suspension. In fact, cherru‘cal forms of certain
`poor—tasting drugs have been specifically developed
`for their insolubility in a desired vehicle for the sole
`purpose of preparing a palatable liquid dosage form.
`For example, the water—insoluble ester form of chlo-
`rarnphenicol, chloramphenicolpahnitate, was devel-
`oped to prepare a palatable liquid dosage form of the
`cl'iloramphenicol, the result being the development
`of Chlorampherficol Palmitate Oral Suspension USP!
`By the creation of insoluble forms of drugs for use in
`suspensions, the diffith tasteemaskhig problems of
`deVelolarnentel pharmacists are greatly reduced, and
`the Selection of the flavoran'ts to be used in a given
`suepension may be based on taste preference rather
`than on a particular flavorant’s ability to act as a
`masking agent for an unpleasant tasting drug. Forthe
`mostpart, oral suspensions are aqueous preparations
`with the Vehicle flavored and sweetened to suit the
`
`anticipated taste preferences of the intended patient.
`
`Features Desired in a
`
`Pharmaceutical Suspension
`
`There are many considerations in the develop-
`ment and preparation of a phannaceutically ele-
`
`gant suspension. In addition to therapeutic efficacy,
`chemical stability of the oomponents of the formu-
`lation, permanency of the preparation, and esthetic
`appeal of the preparation—desirable qualities in
`all pharmaceutical preparations—a few other fea-
`tures apply more specifically—to the pharmaceutical
`suspension:
`
`‘1. A properly prepared pharmaceutical suspension
`should settle slowlyand should be readily redis-
`persed upon the gentle shaking of the container.
`2. The characteristics of the sospension should be
`such that the particle size of the suspensoid re«
`mains fairly constant throughout long periods
`of undisturbed standing.
`3. The suspension should pour readily and evenly
`from its container.
`
`These main features of a mispension, which de-
`pend on the nature of the dispersed phase, the dis-
`persion medium. and pharmaceutical adjuncts. will
`be discussed briefly.
`
`Sedimentation Rate of the
`
`Particles of a Suspension
`
`The ondousflctm’s involved in the rate ofoeiocity of
`settling of the potholes of“ suspension are embodied in
`the equation ofStakes’ into, which is presented in the ac-
`companying Physical Pharmacy Capsule.
`Stokes’ equation was derived for an ideal situa-
`tion in which uniform, perfectly spherical particles
`in a very dilute suspension settle without effecting
`turbulence in their downward course, without col-
`lision of the particles of the Suspensoid._and with-
`out chetnical or physical attraction or affinity for the
`dispersion medium. Obviously. Stokes’ equation
`does not apply precisely to the usual pharmaceuti-
`cal suspension in which the suspensoid is irregu-
`larly shaped, of various particle diameters, and not
`spherical. in which the fall of the particles does re
`suit in both turbulence and collision, and also in
`which there may be a reasonable amount of affine
`ity of the particles for the suspension medium.How-
`ever, the basic concepts bf the equation do give a
`valid indication of the factors that are important to
`the suspension of the particles and a clue to the pos-
`sible adjustments that can be made to a formulation
`to decrease the rate of particle sedimentation.
`From the equation it is apparent that the veloc-
`ity of fall of a suspended particle is greater for larger
`particles than it is for smaller particles, all other fac-
`tors remainirig constant. By reducing the particle
`size of the dispersed phase, one can expect a slower
`rate of descent of the particles. Also, the greater the
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2097 p. 7
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposefiysm
`
`349
`
`
`
`Physical Pharmacy Capsule 13.1 Sedimentation Rate 8; Stokes' Equation
`
`Stokes’ Equation:
`
`where
`
`3 = filo-JAR
`dt
`lB'q
`
`dx/dt is the rate of settling,
`d is the diameter of the particles,
`pi is the density of the particle.
`p. is the density of the medIUm,
`g is the gravitational constant, and
`11 is the viscosity of the medium.
`
`A number of factors can be adjusted to enhance the ph ical stability of a suspension, including the di-
`ameter of the particles and the density and viscosity of t e medium. The effect of changing these is illus-
`trated in the following example.
`EXAMPLE I
`_
`A powder has a density of l .3 g/CC and is available as acpowder with an average particle diameter of
`i
`2.5 microns (assuming the particles to be spheres). Accor ng to Stoke's Equation, this powder will set—
`tle in water [Viscosity of i cps assumed) at a rate of".
`
`[2.5 x iO-‘HLS — 1.0”980} =
`18 x 0’0]
`
`1.02 x '10
`
`_4
`
`cm/seo
`
`if the-particle size of the wder is reduced to 0.25 p. and water is still used as the‘dispersion medium,
`the powder will now sette at a rate of:
`
`3‘ 10-5213 —
`is X 0.0T
`
`___
`
`x 10—6 cmfsac
`
`As is evident, a decrease in particle size by a factor of 10 results in a reduction in the rate of settling by
`a factor of 100. This enhanced effect is a result of the "cl" factor in Stakes Equation being squared.
`
`Now, ifa different dispersion medium, sUch as glycerin, is used in place of water, a further decrease in
`settling Will result. Glycerin has a density of 1.25 glue and a viscostty at 400 cps.
`
`The larger particle size powder [2.5 u.) will settle at a rate of:
`mi!
`_
`[2.5 x10 } [1.3
`18.4
`
`1.2511930) mus x wean/m
`
`The smaller particle size (0.25 M Powder will now settle at a rate of:
`
`[2.5 X l0‘5[2|1.3 - l.25“980| =
`18x4
`
`-10
`4.25MB crn/sec
`
`A summary of these results is shown in the Following table:
`
`Condition
`
`Rate of Settling {cm/sec}
`
`2.5 apowder in water
`0.2.5 p. powder in water
`2.5 a. powder in glycerin
`0.25 p. powder in glycerin
`
`1.02 x 10"
`1.02 X 10“
`4.25 x it)"5
`4.25 x 10""
`
`As is evident from this table, a change in dispersion medium results in the greatest change in the rate of
`settling of particles. Particle size reduction also can contrlete significantly to suspension stability. These
`factors are important in the formulation of physically stable suspensions.
`
`AstraZencca Exhibit 2097 p. 8
`
`

`

`35:1
`
`DisperseSysiems
`
`density of the particles, the greater the rate of de-
`scent, provided the density of the vehicle is not al—
`tered. Because aqueous vehicles are used in phar~
`maceutical oral scepensions, the density of the
`particles is generally greater than that of the vehi-
`Cieli a desirable feature, for if the particles were less
`dense than the vehicle, they would tend to float,
`and floating particles would be quite difiicult to dis-
`tribute unifom'lly in the vehicle. The rate of sedi-
`mentation may be appreciably reduced by increas-
`ing the viscosity of the dispersion medium, and
`within limits of practicality this may be done. How-
`ever, a product having too high a fiscosity is not
`generally desirable, because it pours with difficulty
`and it is equally difficult to redisperse the suspen-
`soidfiherefore, iftheviscosity ofa suspensionisin-
`creased, it is done so only to a modest extent to
`avoid these difficulties.
`
`The viscosity characteristics of a suspension may
`be altered not only by the vehicle used, but also by
`the solids content.As the proportion ofsolid parti-
`cles is. increased ina suspensim‘ll so is the viscosity.
`The viscosity of a pharmaceutical preparation may
`
`be determined through the use of a BrookfieldVis-
`cometer. whidi measures viscOSity by the force re-
`quired to rotate a spindle in the fluid being tested
`0’13— 13-3)-
`_
`For the most part, the physical stability of a phar-
`maceutical suspension appears to be most approv
`pliately adjusted by an alteration in the
`phase rather than through great changes in the dis-
`persion medium In most instances, the dispersion
`medium is supportive to the adin dispersed
`phase. These adiusbnents mainly are conoemed
`with particle size, uniformity of particle size, and
`separation ofthe particles so that theyare not liker
`to become greatly larger or to form a solid cake on
`standing.
`
`Physical Features of the Dispersed
`Phase of a Suspension
`
`Probably the most important single oonsideralion
`in a discussion of suspensions is the size of the drug
`particles. In most good pharmaceutical suspensions.
`the pertiCIe diameteris between 1 and 50 urn.
`
`Synchronous motor
`
`Speed-selector knob
`
`
`
`Oil-Off toggle switch
` Clutch lever
`
`
`
`Pointer
`
`
`
`Jewel healing support
`
`Spindie coupling not
`
`Immersion mark
`
`Spindle body
`
`Removable
`splndle guard
`
`Sample
`container
`
`Big 13.3 Stile-inane rimming ofthe Bmkfieldllismmeten {Courtesy gramme Engineering mummies.)
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2097 p. 9
`
`

`

`Particle size reduction is generally accomplished
`by dry-milling prior to the incorporation of the dis-
`persed phaso into the dispersion medium. One of
`the most rapid, convenient, and inexpensive meth-
`ods of producing fine drug powders of about 10 to
`50 um size is nricropuluoization. Micropulverisers
`are '
`speed, atnitim'l or impact mills which are
`efl'icient in reducing powders to the size neceptable
`for most oral and topical suspensions. For still finer
`particles, under 10 pm, the process offluid energy
`grinding. sometimes referred to asjet-millingor mi-
`«seizing,
`is quite effective. By- this process, the
`shearing action of high velocity compressed air
`streams on the particles in a confined space pro-
`duces the desired ultrafine or rrlicronized particles.
`The particlurs to be stimulated are swept into vio-
`lent turbulence by the sonic-and supersonic veloc-
`ity of the air streams. The particles are accelerated
`into high velocities and collide with one another,
`resulting in fragmentation and a decrease in the
`size ofthe particles; This. method maybe employed
`in instances in which the particles are intended for
`parenteral or ophthalmic stupensions. Particles of
`extremely small dimensions may also be produced
`byspraywdrying techniques. A spray dryer is a cone-
`shaped piece of apparatus into which a solution of
`a drug is sprayed and rapidly dried by a current of
`warmed, dry air circulatingin the cone. The result-
`ing dry powder is then collected. It is not possible
`for a community pharmacist to achieve the same
`degree of particle-size reduction with such simple
`commuting equipment as the mortar and pestle.
`However. many minimized rings are commer-
`cially available and when needed may be pur-
`chased by the pharmacist in bulls quantities.
`As shown by Stokes’ equation, the reduction in
`the particle size of a suspensoid is beneficial to the
`stability of the suspension in that the rate of sedi-
`mentation of the solid particles is reduced as the
`particles are decreased in size. The reduction in
`particle size produces slow. more uniform rates of
`settling. However. one should avoid reducmg the
`particle size to too great a degree of fineness, since
`fine particles. havo a tendency to form a compact
`cake upon settling to the bottom of the container.
`The msult may be that the cake resists breakup
`upon shaking. and forms
`aggregates of parti-
`cles which are of larger dimension and less Sus-
`pendable than the original suspensoidThe particle
`shape of the suspensoid can also affect taking and
`product stability. It has been show that meni—
`cal barrel-shaped particles of calcium carbonate
`produced more stable seepensions than did asym—
`metrical needle-shaped particles of the same agent.
`
`Dispose System
`
`351
`
`The needle-shaped particles formed a tenacious
`sediment-cake on standing which could not be re-
`distributed whereas the barrel-shaped particles did
`not cake on standing (1).
`To avoid the fiormation of a cake, measures must
`be taken to prevent the agglomeration of the parti-
`cles into laryr crystals or into masses. One com—
`mon method of preVenting the rigid cohesion of
`small
`of .a suspension is through the in—
`tentional lormation of a less rigid or loose aggrega-
`tion of the particles held together by comparatively
`weak particle—to-particle bonding forces. Such. an
`aggregation of particles is termed afloc or afloccule,
`with flocculated particles forming a type of lattice
`structure that resists complete settling (although
`flocs settle more rapidly than fine. individual parti-
`cles) and thus are loss prone to compaction than
`unflooculated particles. The flocs settle to form a
`higher sediment volume than unflocoilated parli-
`c'les. the loose structure of which permits the ag-
`gregates to break up easily and distribute readily
`with a small amount of agitation.
`There are several methods of preparing floc-
`culatod
`suspensions.
`the
`choice
`depending
`onthenrpeofdrugirwolvedandthetype ofproduet
`desired. For instance,
`in the preparation of an
`oral suspension ofadrug, clays such as cfihited ben—
`tonite magma are oormnonly employed as the
`flocoilating agont. The structure of the bentonibe
`magma and of other clays used for this purpose also
`assists. the suspension
`helping to support the doc
`onceformed.When claysareunsuitable asagents,as
`in a parenteral suspension, frequently a fine of the
`dispersed phase can be produced by an alteration in
`the pHofthepreparafion (generally totheregion of
`curds-tum drug solubility). Electrolytes. can also act
`as tlocoilati'ng agents, apparently by reduong the
`electrical barrier between the particles of the sus-
`pensoidandiormingabridgesoastolinkthemto—
`gather. The carefully determined concentration of
`norlionic and ionic surface-active agents (surfac-
`tants) can also induce the flocculation of particles in
`suspension and irurease the sedimentationvolume.
`
`Dispersion Medium
`
`Chonfirnes, as with highly flocculated suspEn-
`sions. the particles of a suspension settle too rapidly
`to be consistent with what might be tanned a phar—
`rriaceutioall}r elegant preparation. The rapid settling
`hinders the accurate measurement of dosage and
`from an esthetic point of View produces too on-
`sightly a supernatant layer. in many of the commer-
`cial suspensions, suspending agents are added
`
`Astra-Zoneca Exhibit 2097 p. 10
`
`

`

`352
`
`Disperse Systems
`
`to the dispersion medium to lend ita structure to
`assist in the suspension of the dispersed phase.
`Ctrboxymethyicellulose, methylcellulose, n'tiu'ocrys-
`talline cellulose. polyvinyl pyrrolidone, xanthan
`gum. and bentonlte are a few of the agents em—
`ployed to thicken the dispersion medium and help
`suspend the suspensoid. When polymeric sub—
`stances and hydrophilic colloids are used as sus-
`pending agents, appropriate tests must be per»
`formed to show that the agent does not interfere
`with the availability for therapeutic eEtects of
`the suspension‘s medicinal substance. These mate-
`rials can bind certain medicinal agents, rendering
`them unavailable or more slowly available for their
`therapeutic function. Also, the amount of the sus—
`pending agent must not be such to render the sus-
`pension too viscous to agate (to distribute the
`susporsoid) or to pour. The study of the flow char-
`acteristics is termed rheology. A summary of the
`concepts of rheologyis found in the accompanying
`Physical Pharmacy Capsule 13.2.
`Support of the suspensoid by the diapersion
`medium may depend on several factors: the density
`of the suspensoid, whether it is flocculated, and the
`amount of material requiring support.
`The solid content of a suspension intended for
`oral administration may vary considerably, depend-
`ing on the dose of the drug to be adofinisbered, the
`volume of product desired to be administered, and
`also on the ability of the dispersion medium to sup-
`port the concentration of drug while maintaining
`desirable feanues of fiscosity and flow. The usual
`adult oral suspension is frequently designed to sup-
`ply the dose of the particular drug in a convenient
`measure of 5 mL or one 'teaspoonfrd. Pediatric sus-
`pensions are formulated to deliver the appropriate
`dose of drug by administefing a close-calibrated
`number of drops. Figure 13.4 shows conunonly
`packaged oralsuspensions adrrdnlsteredaspediatdc
`drops. Some are accompanied by a calibrated drop-
`
`
`
`Fig. 13.4 Examples of oral pediatric suspensions showing
`package designs ofa built-in dropper device and a calibrated
`dropper accompanying the medication container:
`
`per, whereas other packages have the drop capabil—
`ity built into the container. On administration the
`drops maybe placed directly into the infant’s mouth
`orminedwithasmwportionoffoodbecausemany
`of the suspensions of antibiotic drugs intended for
`pediatric use are prepared in a highly flavored.
`sweetened, colored base, theyare bequentlyreferred
`to by their manufacturers and also popularly as
`“SWAPS,”EVEI1 thoughinfact they are suspensions.
`
`Preparation of Suspensions
`
`1n the proparatlon of a suspension, the pharma-
`cist must be acquainted with the characteristics of
`both the intended dispersed phase and the disper-
`sion medium. In some instances the dispersed
`phase has an affinityfor the vehicle to be employed
`and is readilyflwettedfiyit upon its addition. Other
`drugs are not penetrated easily by the vehicle and
`have a. tendency to dump together or to float on top
`of the vehicle. In the latter case, the powder must
`first be wetted by a so-called "wetting agent” to
`make the powder more penetrable by the disper-
`sion medium. Alcohol, glycerin, and other hygro~
`soopic liquids are employed as wetting agents when
`an aqueous vehicle is to be used as the dispersion
`phase. They function by displacing the air in the
`crevices of the particles, dispersing the particles,
`and subsequently allowing the penetration of dis-
`persion medium into the powdenln the large-scale
`preparation of suspensions the wetting agents are
`mixedwiththeparticlesbyanappsratus suchasa
`colloid mill; on a small scale in the pharmacy} they
`are mixed witha mortar and pestle. Once the pow-
`deriswetted, thedispersionmedium (towhichhave
`been added all of the fiomiulation's soluble compo—
`nents such as colorants, flavorants, and preserva-
`tives) is added in portions to the powder. and the
`mixture is thoroughly blended before subsequent
`additions of vehicle,A portion of H18 vehicle is used
`to wash the mixing equipment free of suspensoid,
`and this portion is used to bring the suspension to
`final volume and insure that the suspension con-
`tains the desired concentration of solid matter. The
`
`final product is then passed through a colloid mill or
`other blender or
`device to insure uniformity.-
`Whenever appropriate,
`suitable preservatives
`should be included in the formulaticn of suspensions
`to preserve against bacterial and mold contamination
`An example formula for an oral suspension fol-
`lows (Z). In the example, the suSpensoid is the
`antacid aluminum hydroxide, the pres ervatiVes are
`methylparaben and propylp araben, with syrup and
`sorbitol solution providing the viscosity as well as
`the sweetness.
`
`Asuacheca Exhibit 2097 p. 1 l
`
`

`

`
`
`DisperseSystems
`
`353
`
`Physical Pharmacy Capsule 131
`
`Rheoloy
`
`Rheology is the study of flow and involves the viscosity characteristics of powders, iluids, and semisolids.
`Materials are divided Into two general categories depending upon their tlow characteristics: Newtonian
`and non-Newtonian. Newtonian tlow is characterized by a constant viscosity, regardless at the shear
`rates applied. Non-Newtonian Flow is characterized by a change in viscosity characteristics with in-
`creasing shear rates. Non-Newtonian Flow includes plastic. pseudoplastic and dilatant Flow.
`
`Newton's Law at Flow relates parallel layers at liquid, with the bottom layer fixed, when a force is placed
`on the top layer and the top plane moves at constant velocity and each lower layer moves with a veloc-
`ity directly proportional to its distance from the stationary bottom layer. The velocity gradient, or rate at
`shear (clv/dr), is the difference of velocity dv betWeen twa planes of liquid Separated by the distance dr.
`The Force {F'/A] applied to the top layer that is required to result in Flow (rate at shear, G! [5 called the
`shearing stress
`The relationship can be expressed.
`
`.51 _ i
`A _ 11 dr
`
`where n is the viscosity coefficient, or viscosity. This relationship is often written
`
`,_ F
`‘1 ' a
`
`where F = F’/A and G = dv/d r. The higher the viscosity at a liquid, the greater the shearing stress re-
`quired to produce a certain rate of shear. A plot at F vs G yields a rheogram. A Newtonian fluid will plot
`as a straight line with the slope at the line being 11. The unit at viscosity is the poise, which is the shear-
`ing force required to produce a velocity at l cmg’sec between two parallel planes at liquid, each 1 cm2
`in area and separated by a distance at 1 cm. The most convenient unit to use is the centipoise, or cp
`(equivalent to 0.01 poise].
`
`These basic concepts can be illustrated in the following two graphs.
`
`RateofShear
`
`Z t
`
`Viscose);
`
`Shearing Stress
`
`Shear Ftate
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`What is the shear rate when on oil is rubbed into the skin with a relative rate of motion between the tin-
`gers and the skin at about 10 cm/sec and the tilrn thickness [5 about 0.02 cm?
`
`_ 10 cm/sec _
`_1
`G «- —-——-—-—o‘02 « 500 sec
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2097 p. 12
`
`

`

`35¢
`
`Dispose Systems
`
`
`
`Rheology (Continued)
`
`The viscosity of Newtonian materials can be easily determined using a capillary viscometer, such as the
`Ostwald Pipet, and the following relationship:
`
`11’ = kid
`
`where 11' = viscosity,
`k = a coefficient, including such factors as the radius and length of the capillary, volume of the
`liquid flowing, pressure head, etc,
`i = time, and
`cl = density of the material.
`The official compendia, the USP-NF, utilize Kinematic Viscosity, which is the absolute viscosity divided by
`the density of the liquid, as follow;
`
`Kinematic viscosity = 1179
`The relative viscosity of a liquid can be obtained by utilizing a co illary viscometer and comparin data
`with a second liquid of known viscosity, provided the densities o the two liquids are known, as to lows:
`
`mm 2
`
`n‘f’n'a = [Pfl/lpalal
`
`At 25"C, water has a density of 1.0 /cc and a viscosity of 0.895 cps. The time of flow of water in a
`capillary viscometer is 15 sec. A 50
`aqueous solution of glycerin has a flow time of 750 sec. The den-
`sity of the glycerin solution is i .2 i s gfcc. What is the vixosity of the glycerin solution?
`, E [U.895]l750}[i.216] =
`-
`unis:
`“'4 “P5
`
`“
`
`EXAMI'LE 3
`
`The time of flow between marks on an Oslwalcl viscometer using water [p = l} was 120 sec at 20°C.
`The time for a liquid (p = 1.05} to flow through

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket