throbber
D5
`
`‘ilili l..4'h.!*i{.§J:£‘1‘
`
`Rmma “
`1 mm LC}, Wcbcx 1}}, lawn SM. Iiuxismtal Ixanmzissiazz of hcpatitia
`B virus. Lammr "E989; i: 8B‘1'«§3.
`2 Bazmiear RH; Samplimr R, Gamay R, Taber E, Kamfilmn F,
`riathuasuu N. Hepatitis B izxfectécn in hnuaehaids «if chwnic carrimrzi an!
`hnputitis B surface mtigezn: fmsmm associated wizh pmmimcc -3!’
`infection. Am} Emkiemiof @825 1115: 199-21 3.
`3 Pranks A, Bcrsfils Km: M:'&, H 31. 3'!-mntitis B virus irxfiectiw mum;
`children barn in the Unites $123“:-=23 ta Smnmx.-at Asian refugees. 355 Eng!
`3 stm'19s§;a:3: 3301-35,
`at Fwiede flu Haxtisflig iirxhagrashi 3'3-L Shaw FE. fichnwtakwwlfismw 1’£’.:,
`Ema M. Tmnmissfion afimjtarixis E vima fmm ndngztnsi Asian
`chiidncn 2:: their fmniiies rim 3’ fixtaffc Hmrzic 1933; '78.: 26-29.
`5 van ilitzhuz-fsetl Th JM, 120: W5‘iI:te—u':‘1n D2: Sczhn-ME, van [nan AM,
`PJM, Yap SH. Hcpatifin B in an institution in: the mmtaily
`mudafi. Aw} fifafiemfai W88; K33: 629*-53.
`Irfnyuhi I. Kuhiwagi E, Mama: 1!, iiaiig-nun W, Ehcuumz H.
`325: 49
`.
`wgsvims nmmminsian in nursery sciamk. Am gag-,«22.m.*a: 1933:
`
`it
`
`'3
`
`‘fan I}anmm P, Mnrxnm A. ficpasitis 13 in mmml haandkugpa haapimls.
`£.::m-:3 1989; E: 34043.
`S Mufhflfipa K3,, Euliins EC, Spigland I. Htpratitis B virus ixiftattimn
`mtnsmiztcd Ram retarded children :1: their families dmring brinflmme
`zatgruauzc. j’ fixifasr Gmwmmnf N89 19%}; 3: E-9'41.
`9 jeniwn SA, Lemam SM, Balm L.N._. Ncwboki IE. Qmnumtivc anatysis
`af hepatitis 13 ms mm fin saliva and semen uf chrrmicallgs infiectezi
`ham-ussexuai wave. 3 Irgfiist Dis 1987; 15%: 299%?-£17.
`1&3 Emcécrfieuo T1’, 6:: Medina M, Sh-may 1,, vnilcdnr MI), Echifi ER. in
`inmmticmai mzzhreak at hggmiiis B telatsect ca a human Exiting cam‘-tr.
`3? rsgzw Bis 1932; M6: $52-~56.
`
`
`Bnnartnlant as! Egxldcmlu-lazy and cnvnnumlty Medicine. umwmay
`at Antivem. 23113 irmmparn. Baagium (23 van mxmmse an.
`M Gramm ms». 343 Van Der mmera. A Mam;-etza pm}: and Imtlflmcat
`Hyflemmll Eptdaaui-alum Brmasais. Eamon: {R mack: may
`sarrapondamu in: Dr Pietra Van Oamma
`
`than 81 ycarfi aid wit};
`I‘) pirsmzaanpausai patients X4385
`advanced, histnicgicaiiy wrififi, breast cmcacr
`resistant
`to:
`tsmaxifm wen: mated with EC} 182180. The study was
`sppravcd by the ethics vzzommimaw 9’? each clinics} wzcntm.
`Bzticnts were included if they had been tmatcd with tammtifen as
`an adiuvam ts: surgery fut mare than twu ycars smi than rczfszpscd
`or taster} with tamaacifen far advxncezfi disease. bati =-1 mmpkete
`or parzial tamissian, :3: an change fear at least six xtxcxsztiw and
`suhsequmdar . Patients were exrziudcd if they had
`serious intermittent diseasz, a WHQ perfurmance sums at
`grzazar tixau 2 and 1: iii: exptcaancy uf lass thaxa 3 mcsmhs, arr had
`received mixer nhemathempy. Que paiiemt had adjmvan: therapy
`for erzmiy 9 months and prugtressed, and was thus :1 pmtmai
`viniatinn but
`is insluciad in the analysis. She had pmgrcssive
`xfistase when {Itasca with K21 182’?8{}. The pmcimzmmt sites ca-f
`disease 131 the time afrténpse an tamuxifen were: bxexstfchtsz wall
`{7}, lymph nmias (1), ‘bane: {:9}, and lungfpleuza {2}. am: giving
`infutmcd rsoascnt,
`all patients underwent baseiine staging
`énvststigazitms bcforc starting Lrwznrtcm with {C1
`i32’?‘8£3;
`including mfiiograghs, liver ultrasnund :3: mmpnted mmugarsspix
`scan (at! awry E-2 manthr-3. and isamp: ban: man {every 6
`mmtha}.
`ICI
`lS3?3i¥ was aéminismrcd as 4 Earns;-acting
`fmrmulatzicm in an
`sazutar
`cvibbased
`xrehicie
`by mcmflalar
`int:-axnumflnr ismfection into at burmck. Far aafazzr appraiaaig the
`first 4 patients received mscnlating xi-uses nf ICI 132780} starting
`with $00 mg the firs: sheath and incrcasing m 25:} mg fr-Lam
`month 2 cmwarzis, fnlinwing cc-nfirnmtiun cf lack at" lcrcal m‘
`systemic drug tuxicity at the 3130 mg dc;-ac. Pavimts Sui? tcceivezd
`2512} mgfrrsunxh fmm flu uuniet. 'I‘k'c:atrx:::m with ICI 382’i’30 was
`contingent until cancer progressicm cecmrrcé. Patients were new
`every 34? days during that first muzz-ntzh ll! monim: mag! and
`systexnic: érug Ix:-Ierflhility and tr: saline! blood samplea far
`pharmamkinefic studies. ‘I‘h-:rea£m:, tevinw was dent mnnthly tn
`evaluate mspanse aid :0 manitm lanai and systcmic cirug
`tn1em‘bi11'*t}'. Bimti samples arm: takcn hcfitzre treatmem mad at
`monahiy Eran-rvais thermfmr far measurement of full taioczd count,
`binchcmimry, scrum h-brmoncs, and lipids. Caxscey respnnse was
`cvaiuated according to UICC aritcria. "Ii: quafifisr far the “no
`change” taztcgurgr, canmr gmwth had ti} stahiiisr: for mart: than
`six manrinsfi
`
`lhipdflia in
`Siam!!! (K4
`Brusflian {Marsha}
`Ii}: 3.E2!‘8a3
`
`Rsespansa tn a spaclflc antlaastmgen
`(EC! :t.32?80} in tamoxrfemasktant
`breast canes:
`
`("“«3Anthnny Haweff, Davis! Defriena‘, Jana fiobertsan,
`Roger arameyg Peter Waftcm
`
`
`we treaieci 19 natients with advanced breast cancer
`resistant to tamoxifen with a new specific antiaestrugen
`{H31 1S§!“r'S0) which.
`in arsimat studies, has an sgunist
`activity‘. 13 {£‘59‘3£} patients saspanded H‘ has? partiai
`respoases
`and 8
`shsrzwed nu ahanga}
`in mamniy
`mzramuscular injections of mi 182‘:'8f} after progression on
`tamoxifen.
`fur a median ziuration cf 13 months with
`minimum side effects. Fretiminary evidence suggests that
`the agent
`is wittmzrt effects on the
`tiver or
`the
`hypathalarnis-aituitary axis.
`ICI :£8E?8{} appears in be a
`prcmising new agfiem fer treatment of advanced and earfy
`breast cancer.
`
`Lancet 1995: 345: 29-60
`
`‘L...
`
`Mtimugh haif of all patients: with advanced breast cancer
`ham: cancer; which either rergmss or remain stabie when
`mated with tamaxifen, mmcmrs
`eventually: bezcumc
`resistant aftar a median duration {If tamission cf fifteen
`months. Alzixrmgh an antagonist with respect
`to the
`caucezr, tamaxifcn is an aestrogenic agonist with respect to
`bone, fiver, and amiometrium. {}ne came of rasistance
`may be the cancer macfing ta tammtifan as an aguniat at
`that mm-axifan is, in some way, rendered unavailable to
`aestxogen rcczezptcsrs so that endagmzous cezstradiol is able:
`tn msrixnntata cancer gmwrh. Ta test this hypcthesia, we
`treated patients with cancers resistant to tammtifen with
`an
`wtrimzsarageu
`(ICE
`182?3£!:
`?::-£*3{4,=§.5,5.S
`pentaflur:mpenr5r§s1:1finyi}nnn3:E} oestra~ 1 ,3, §,{1t'3)~:ri-me-
`?z,1’{»*B~diu1) which, in animal studies, has Ewen shcewn to
`have no agzmist acsixrityd
`anti':zc:aI;rc-gsaxz with an
`ICII 182'?8i)
`is a atamidal
`Eikyistfiphinyl side chain in the '33 pcssition. There is
`widens: {hat the side chain prevents. ciimerisaticm of twin
`rnalecszfics
`cf
`the
`aeatmgm rerzcpmr which
`is
`a
`prerequisite
`far
`gem:
`Lranscriptitm.‘
`In
`contrast,
`tamoxifen, like K:-estzmgena, causes :'cCI":pEC.*t dimatisaticm
`and partly initiates gem: transcription; which is the basis
`of‘ its gzarsziai agonist aactivitgn’
`
`7 13?)
`
`13» F321
`
`E :33}
`
`Parka:-:3
`
`H»: change
`
`Psagxessear.
`
`2€I+«IPf¥ 19;. 13-t[I~:»2 E}, i?+§A67), 3?‘ {PER}
`12 {ms}, 5:11.293, 3 :A*.»":';;
`23=+£?«it’38}. 18+{A?-fig, 18+{A?1}. 1Er+{NE 4&5.
`1&1-{A23}. am: 3:11
`am panama gsogresicd In «as weeks. Prwrav-us
`areaimr.-at mil‘: tmmmifen A48, .1485, NC 3‘.
`FR 8. 9. W12
`
`Lemar: in hractcefs rndacate respcmae in tammufm wimn gman for am-annea 6+9-erase
`(PR‘»-‘1f,}8rtfr§‘ rmégaion, mum mange. mzptngresswe disease} at efigax-an as an
`anjuvait mmpy ch}. flumhers £1 bmckats inmate duratic-:1 uf {remnant with
`tanaizhfue.
`
`Tabia: Rupmm mu: amt dnraticms an! umpmsau in E6! xazmo
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 10560001
`
`

`

`THE 1.A.N(..'.l:i'1‘
`
`
`
`19 patients wen: evaluable (table). 13 (69%)
`Ali
`responded ‘£0 treaunem for a median duratitm cf more
`than 18 mamhs.
`*9 are still raaponding and ccnlinuing
`treatment with ICI 182730 after 15-23 months. Sites of
`response were 5010: tissue (4), bane {'1'}, and lung (3).
`Respnnses were seen in 6 of 9 women who haii pmgressed
`whilst receiving tamuxifen fur advanced disease and in ‘i’
`at‘ 10 women who had reccivcd tamoxifen as adiuvant
`thtmgty. There appcared to be no associaticzrn bctwecn
`duratinn of treatmcm with tamoxifen and subsequent
`response to ICI 139380. No serious drug~re1at::d adverse
`events occurred; minur adverse events were reported by 2
`patients-wtransieznt bimd—staiz1ed vaginal discharge and 3
`subicctive fceiing of living in a “dream like state?’ {similar
`to» that she had whilst taidng mmmcifenj in one: patient,
`and aitaration of body odour (noticed by her husband for
`com: mimth), passibly associated with increased hair
`greasiness, in the other. ’I‘hc;xe was no alteration in that
`frequency; of nigh: swans or hm: flushes;
`if already
`present, and none was initiated. None of the patients
`reported vaginal drynasa or alterad libido an dime:
`quastioning at each ms:-patient attendance. ICI 18380
`appeared well tolerated at the site of iniecticm despite the
`relatively large 5 ml. volume administered, with cant? 3
`patients dnveiaping bruising or arythema on one occasian
`cash. There were no clinically significant changes in full
`blcoud count <3: unexpected changes in bicachemical tests.
`Guy study shows that patients with advanced breast
`cancer respand to a specific antioestxogen after failure of
`treatment with a partial—agonist antioestrogen. There
`appeared m be no mess resistance Immeen ICI 182?80
`and taxnaxifen in 69% of patients, whereas studies where
`tamoxifen—resistan1: patients were treated with another
`triphenyicthykne antiocsurcgen, toremifizzm, hair: reported
`much higher rates of cross resistance.’ The median
`duraticm of réspcmse to ICI 182780 has not yet been
`reached, but is already longer than we might expect imm
`other second-line, mdocrin: therapies such :35 megeazmul
`acttatc.
`
`to act exclusively as an
`is thcmght
`182’é‘S£)
`ICI
`antioastrcgczn via the oestrugen rzccptcsrx Thus response
`to treatment with ICI 182780 suggests that oestrogen
`receptors remain functicmal and that tamoxifen therapy
`fails because cancer
`regrowth is pmduced
`by an
`cseswrogenic
`stimuius. The cancer may acquire the
`capacity m respcmd to the partial agonist activity sf
`tamoxifexs.
`andfm:
`its varinus metabolites‘ This
`is
`supported by the ability cf tamcsxifen tcze atimidate
`pm-liferatien of primary human breast cancer mils grmxrn
`in-vitro,‘ and also by the cxccasicmal clinical findings af
`patients whose
`canccrs
`rcapand to withdmwal of
`tamaxifm at the time of treatment failure.‘ Altarxzatively,
`changes in the inuaceliular rsandiing of mmoxifen may
`reduce its abiifity ta btock oestr-agen reccptars and allow
`stimulatitm :31" cancer growth by andcagennus mastrogens.
`This might occur as a result of cancer «sails acquiring the
`ability;
`tn
`inactivate
`tamaxifen
`by
`intracellular
`degradatiun, intraceiiular seqnesvtatian to prmeins mixer
`than oeurogen rec-aptarsg or by increased drug exclusion
`from the c:-2:1.“ Our data do mm: distinguish between these
`resistance mechanisms.
`
`Freiiminary data (net shown) from this study Sh-UW an
`initial rise in serum genadcetmpin during the first fiuee
`nmnths of Imatxnent with ICI 182780 iprebablgs as a
`result of cessation of tamcxxifen therapy} but no further
`changes thereafter. In View cf thc lack af initiation or
`
`alteration of hot flushes and hm: sweats men in the study,
`thaw: data suggest that, as was predicted fmm animal
`studies,‘
`ICI 182780 may be withaut effect on the
`hypothalamus and pituitary gland. ICE E82380 may also
`be peripherally selective with respect to the liver since no
`significant efihezts on se2c~horrnone—hinding gioknxlin and
`fipid have been seen in the present study. In primates and
`in shm't~term studies in w0men,‘° ICI 182?80 inhibited
`endcmetrial prcaliferaticm at simiiar sarum conszczatraticms
`to those seen in this study. Ifa similar inhibimry efibct csf
`ICI 182780 were shcswn in longer-«term studies,
`this
`wauld be a furthez therapeutic advantage of the specific
`antinestcogeng since tamoxifen is known to be associated
`with pmliferatim and endometrial cancer.‘
`Our study suggests that ICE 182730 may impmve the
`rate and duration of response: when used as a firm:-Kine
`tmatmtznt for admnccd breast cancer, zinc:
`ix has nan
`dcmanstrable agcrnist activity. Furahemxoreg the back Of
`toxicity or effect on serum iipids identify ICI 182780 as a
`candidate agent with which to investigate the patential
`benefits of specific antic-estrogens in 111: adjuvant setting.
`
`We thank Sisters 31.1352 £€.i¢ma:a:x and Nidd Scat! for scrvicu in the clinical
`study: Mr E Home, Mr} M T Hmvat, and Mr R J Williams fut mferxing
`patienm; jtean Millexfrar help with preparing the manuacriptg and Zeaxecu
`Pharrmweuticals for financial suppart.
`
`Refaranma
`1 Wakafing ELE, Dukes M, Bowler I. A perm: specific pure antiuestrogen
`with ciiniml potmfial. Cmmzrflss IQQI; S1: 336-‘Er'-73.
`2 Fawe.-1} SE, Whiu R, I-‘inure S, fiydcnham M, 13234: M, ?a1-ker MG.
`Inhihitit:-n of aestvagm receptor-DNA birxcting by the “pure”
`mtmesm:-gen IE1 16-{.384 appears to be mediated’ by immimd recepm:
`dimegizatiun. Rm Maxi Assad Sci USA IENO; 87: 6883-8?.
`3 Barry M, Menage: D, Chambcn P. Rn}: ofxhc two activating clomains
`on the cmstrogen rwapmt in the_ce£}»type and pmmoter-context
`dependent agonist activity of me; anfiwestxagen 4-hyclrox3:tammcifen.
`.E;’v£BO5‘ 1991}; *5: 331148.
`4 Hams}! A, Mndntash Is forms M; Redfanti I, Wagstaiifj, Seiiwoo-ti RA‘
`‘The defixtirxian of the ‘Ne <:!:1ange* categury in patients mtmea with
`andm.-tine therapy and ch:-mnzntherap-y far advanczé ztarcitmmn tn” the
`breast. Em} Cancer {Rim Gncai 1088; 24: 156?-3'2.
`5 Vega}: CL, fihemazto I. Schnnfeldcr I, Gama Rh, Green MR.
`Multimsmer phase II cfiicacy trial of mremificnc in ramaxffen-r:£tacxm'y
`patiernts mt}: advanced breast cancer. 3? min Om»! 19533; 11: 34540‘
`:3 DcFri=n-:1 1}}, Anderson I1, Bali}, Wflh DP‘, Wes: C-ML, iiuwcii A.
`Efiects err 4-hydroxytamcssciffln and 2 pure: amiaestrcsgen {ICK Is:-."?80:
`am the clanogeuix gmwzix cad’ Imman breast cantet me.-1}’; in vitxu.
`Sr} Ccmrei-'i9'E1‘é; 7!}: 2Me«-1}.
`'7 1-Immalla, Do-dwell 1313 Anderson E-I, Redford I. Response after
`w‘rfl1x$m‘wai o‘?mmmtEfe:n and pmgezsmgczns in advanced! breast cane;-.1:-,
`firm (I-'nwI1993;3: 61}-13.
`8 Gshomt CK, Gomnaée E, mm: DC, at :1. Acquired tameidfen
`resistance: csanttlation with reéuucd brcaat turner Ecucls at“ tamcxifcn
`and isumasnmrion of tx‘anas~«¥——hydr0:rytamou:ifen.
`j‘N::rf Gama [mt 1991383: 14"?‘}‘-32.
`9 Pavlik E}, Ndsun K4 Srinivasan 3, ct ai. Rxsiszance as mmoxifm with
`persisting sensitivity as asuogen: possible mediation by exc-nssiva
`antiocstmgen binding site acfivity. Cancer Re: P992; S2: 410642.
`£0 'I'homas E}, ‘$53153-tz FL, 'I'hmnas NM, Buwrsetr M. The eficzs af ICT
`XBEVSD, 2 pure: mticoctstmgvn, on the 119parha1amic-pimi:ary«g+::n3da1-
`axis and an cndmmctrial proiifisratiun in ptezncnx:-pausal vmmen.
`Hm-n Rapwd 1994-; 9; (in press}.
`
`
`can napartmsnt of Medina} Oncology, University of Manchester,
`Christie H-nspltai, Mancmvstm M20 EEK, UK (A Hawaii veep};
`Dapactment ef Surgary. lfntvarsity Hospital at‘ Satrth Nlsnchestzer.
`Manchester. UK {[3 1 Demand mes}; Department or surgery,
`city Haspitat. Na1fingham{Pn:>fR W Biaamey mes,
`3 F Robertsnn raw}; and zmeca Pnsmaamamlcais, Nlacalasfieict,
`Gheshire, UK {P walmn Phil‘)
`
`Cunaapondeuce ta: fir afinthmny Hm-‘er!
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 10560002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket