throbber
472750 MSJ19910.1177/1352458512472750Multiple Sclerosis JournalTanaka et al.
`
`2013
`
`Letter to the Editor
`
`MULTIPLE
`SCLEROSIS MSJ
`JOURNAL
`
`Multiple Sclerosis Journal
`19(9) 1244 –1245
`© The Author(s) 2013
`Reprints and permissions:
`sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
`DOI: 10.1177/1352458512472750
`msj.sagepub.com
`
`Reduced fingolimod dosage treatment
`for patients with multiple sclerosis and
`lymphopenia or neutropenia
`
`Fingolimod has been approved as the first oral treatment
`for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In a
`Japanese clinical trial,1 8.9% of patients treated with
`0.5mg of fingolimod showed lymphocyte counts of < 200
`× 106/l and a reduction of the mean absolute neutrophil
`count of 14% and 25% from baseline at day 15 and month
`6, respectively.
`The maximum fingolimod concentration increased and
`nadir lymphocyte count decreased with dose after a single
`oral dose of fingolimod.2 Steady-state plasma concentra-
`tions were attained 1–2 months after treatment initiation.3
`The steady-state plasma maximum drug concentrations were
`calculated from the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)
`and elimination half-life (T1/2) of fingolimod. Steady-state
`Cmax levels correlated with total doses for six contiguous
`days (dosing ranged from daily to every three days) (data
`not shown).
`Patient 1: a 71-year-old woman with disease duration of
`12 years. Two weeks after starting daily fingolimod treat-
`ment (0.5 mg/day: 3.0 mg/6 days) her lymphocyte counts
`decreased from 800 to 176 × 106/l. Lymphocytes increased
`to 300 × 106/l after changing administration from daily to
`every other day (0.5 mg e.o.d.: 1.5 mg/6 days: three weeks
`after initiation).
`Patient 2: a 28-year-old woman with disease duration
`of one year and seven months. Five weeks after initiation,
`her lymphocyte count decreased (from 1292 × 106/l to
`244 × 106/l) and gradually increased to 474 × 106/l after
`changing from daily (0.5 mg/day: 3 mg/6 days) to 5
`times/6 days (0.5 mg/day: 2.5 mg/6 days) 15 weeks after
`initiation.
`Patient 3: a 35-year-old woman with disease duration of
`14 years. Her neutrophil count decreased from 2457 to
`1336 × 106/l (38% reduction) seven weeks after initiation.
`Neutrophils increased to 1985 × 106/l after changing to
`4 times/6 days (0.5 mg/day: 2.0 mg/6 days).
`None of the three patients showed any clinical relapses
`in the 34–38 weeks from initiation.
`Previous clinical trials of fingolimod have not shown
`that any patients with lymphopenia or neutropenia had to
`
`discontinue the study drug; however, we administered
`fingolimod to patients with small body habitus who may
`have shown higher drug blood concentration after phos-
`phorylation. The body surface area (BSA) of our patients
`was 1.46, 1.55 and 1.45 m2. Plasma concentration should
`be considered when treating women with small BSA. In
`an earlier, ethnic based study, no differences in blood
`concentration after single-dose administration were found
`between Caucasian and Japanese individuals, but the
`authors did not discuss BSA.4 We should consider alterna-
`tive treatment schedules that may include drug holidays
`within a weekly dosing schedule if patients show a rapidly
`decreasing lymphocyte count 2–4 weeks after initiation.
`The mechanisms of neutrophil reduction are not known,
`but there was no relationship between lymphocyte and
`neutrophil counts for these three patients.
`We suggest that the lymphocyte count may correlate
`with the dosage of fingolimod (cumulative dose over
`several weeks) and that the lymphocyte can be controlled
`satisfactorily by administering the same 0.5 mg tablet at
`varying intervals.
`
`Conflict of interest
`The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
`
`Funding
`This study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and
`Welfare of Japan (Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants
`for research on intractable diseases).
`
`References
`1. Saida T, Kikuchi S, Itoyama Y, et al. A randomized, controlled
`trial of fingolimod (FTY720) in Japanese patients with multiple
`sclerosis. Mult Scler J. [Epub ahead of print 21 February 2012,
`DOI: 10.1177/1352458511435984].
`2. Budde K, Schmouder RL, Brunkhorst R, et al. First human
`trial of FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, in stable renal
`transplant patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1073-1083.
`3. Scott LJ. Fingolimod. A review of its use in the management
`of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 2011;
`25: 673-698.
`4. Kovarik JM, Slade A, Voss B, et al. Ethnic sensitivity study of
`fingolimod in white and Asian subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol
`Ther 2007; 45: 98-109.
`
`Apotex v. Novartis
`IPR2017-00854
`NOVARTIS 2067
`
`

`

`Tanaka et al.
`
`1245
`
`Masami Tanaka1, Kwiyoung Park1 and Keiko Tanaka2
`1Multiple Sclerosis Center,
`Utano National Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
`2Department of Neurology, Kanazawa Medical
`University, Japan.
`
`Corresponding author:
`Masami Tanaka, Multiple Sclerosis Center, Utano
`National Hospital, 8 Ondoyama, Narutaki, Ukyo-ku,
`Kyoto, 616-8255, Japan.
`Email: nra17777@nifty.com
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket