throbber
111372016
`The ACROSS study: long—term efficacy offingolimod in patients with... ECTRIMS Online Library. Derfuss T. Sep 16 2016; 145898
`int i Userhame
`
`
`
`
`
`.r Ill
`
`ONLINE LIBRARY
`
`EVENTSICOURSES
`
`ECTRIMS HOME
`
`SPEAKERS/AUTHORS
`
`TYPE OF CONTENT
`
`Advanced
`
`
`
`
`
` “-.-- .15?" f
`
`ea Browse By
`
`7
`
`Sort By
`
`79%
`3167 eFosters
`
`r- ’»
`415Webtasts
`
`177 FPTShared
`
`i p Browse All ContentTypeS
`5194 Abstracts
`
`The ACROSS study: long-term efficacy of fingolimod in patients with
`RRMS (Follow-up at 10 years)
`Author(s): T Derfuss. J Sastre-Garriga,X Montalban, M Rodegher, G Gannon, M Bezuidenhoudt. M Van Hoef. D Silva.
`L Kappos
`ECTRIMS Onlihe Library Dertuss T Sep15.2015.145898
`
`
`
`k. ;
`
`I.
`
`Prof. Tobias Derfuss
`
`Abstract
`
`Discussion Forum (0)
`
`Rate & Comment (0)
`
`IContn'bution
`
`Abstract: P1215
`
`Wpe: Poster
`
`Dist-Patents- Randino
`
`o VIEWEPOSTER
`19 slides
`
`0009
`
`Abstract Category: Therapy- disease modifying - Long-term treatment monitoring
`
`Background: Long-term assessment of disability outcomes
`etfectiveness ofmultiple sclerosis (MS) treatments.
`
`is
`
`important
`
`in the evaluation of the
`
`Objective: In relapsing-remitting MS patients initially enrolled in the phase II proof of concept study we
`evaluated the effect of fingolimod on disability at 10 years. We also determined time to first use of an
`ambulatory device orwheelchair, change in MS functional composite (MSFC) score and MRI outcomes.
`
`Methods: ACROSS was a multicentre, single visit, follow-up study at 10 years, of patients originally
`enrolled in the phase II fingolimod trial. Disability progression is defined as an increase in EDSS score of
`1.5 (ti'om baseline score 0). or 1 (from baseline score 1-5), or 0.5 (from baseline score >5). Patients in the
`continuous fingolim od treatment group (contin-fingo: patients with 26 years of exposure to fingolimod) and
`non-continuous treatment group (non-contin-fingo; patients with < 8 years of exposure to fingolimod) were
`compared using ANCOVA (EDSS) and Cox proportional hazards model (use ofwheel chair) analysis. MRI
`outcomes will be presented separately.
`
`Results: ACROSS enrolled 62.3% (175/281) patients of the original phase II study: mean age was 37.4
`years and 66.9% were women. A total of 59.4% (104/175) were in contin-fingo. 37% of the full phase II
`cohort(104l281).
`
`Disability progression at 10 years was reported in 72 (41.1%) patients. Significantly less patients
`progressed in contin-fingo vs non-contin-fingo groups (33.7% vs 52.7%, p=0.0268). Change from baseline
`EDSS was significantly lower in the contin-fingo vs non-contin-fingo groups (0.58 vs 1.17; p=0.0155). A
`four-fold difference in the time to use of wheelchair was found in favour of contin—fingo vs non-contin-fingo
`groups (HR: 0.24 [95%CI: 0.07 to 0.851).
`
`Twenty- six (14.9%) patients developed secondary progressive MS. significantly less in the contin-fingo vs
`non-contin-fingo groups (10 [9.6%]vs14[25.5%];p=0.0107).
`
`Conclusions: Ten year single visit follow up ofpatients enrolled in the fingolimod phase II study shows high
`treatment persistence. Disability progression was lower in patients on continuous fingolimod compared to
`those who interrupted treatment. Although the study was of observational nature, a causal link between
`reduced disability progression and fingolimod treatment is plausible.
`
`httpzllmlineli braryectrim s—congresseulectrim 5/2016732ndf145898/tobiasderfusstheacross.studylong-term.efiicacy.of.lingolimod.in.patients.htm|?f=m2
`
`1/2
`
`Apotex v. Novartis
`lPR2017-00854
`
`NOVARTIS 2056
`
`Apotex v. Novartis
`IPR2017-00854
`NOVARTIS 2056
`
`

`

`11:3!2016
`
`The ACROSS study: long—term efficacy offingolimod in patients with... ECTRIMS Online Library. Derfuss T. Sep 16 2016; 145898
`
`Disclosure: Funding source: This study is supported by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
`
`Tobias DertiJss serves on scientific advisory boards for Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Merck Serono, Biogen
`Idec, Genzyme, GeNeuro. Mitsubishi Pharma. Teva Pharmaceuticals and Bayer Schering Pharma; has
`received tiJnding for travel andfor speaker honoraria fi'om Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Novartis, Merck Serono
`and Bayer Schering Pharma; and receives research support from Biogen Iclec, Novartis Pharma, the
`European Union.the Swiss National Foundation and the Swiss MS Society.
`
`Jaume Sastre-Garriga received personal fees from Merck-Serena. Biogen ldec, Teva, Roche, and Novartis.
`outside the submitted work.
`
`Xavier Montalban has been a steering committee member of clinical trials or participated in advisory boards
`of clinical
`trials in the past years with Bayer, Schering Pharma. Biogen Idec, EMD Merck Serono,
`Genentech. Genzyme. Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, and Teva Pharmaceuticals.
`
`Ludwig Kappos’ institution (University Hospital Basel) has received in the last 3 years and used exclusively
`for research support: steering committee, advisory board, and consultancy fees (Actelion. Addex. Bayer
`HealthCare, Biogen ldec, Biotica, Genzyme, Lilly, Merck, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pfizer,
`Receptos, Sanofi, Santhera, Siemens, Teva, UCEl, Xenoport); speaker fees (Bayer HealthCare, Biogen
`Idec, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi. Teva); support of educational activities (Bayer HealthCare, Biogen, CSL
`Behring, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva); royalties (Neurostatus Systems GmbH); grants (Bayer
`HealthCare, Biogen Idec, European Union, Merck. Novartis, Roche Research Foundation, Swiss MS
`Society. Swiss National Research Foundation).
`
`Grainne Gannon, Mauritz Elezuidenhouclt, Marlies Van Hoefand Diego Silva are employees ofNovartis.
`
`Click Mobile Connection to access Webcasts & ePosters on iPadriPhone & Android Free Educational Apps
`
`Mobile Connenion 5': or @-
`
`ECTRIMS Home Page | General Terms & Conditions | Technology ProviderTen'ns & Conditions
`
`inlf 8+
`
`2016 © European Com mittee for
`Treatment and Research in
`Multiple Sclerosis. All rights VESSWEd
`
`httpzllmlineli braryectrim s—congresseulectrim s/2016l32ndf145898/tobias.derfuss.the.across.study.|ong—term.efiicacy.of.tingolimod.in.patients.htm|?f=m2
`
`2/2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket