throbber
1.
`
`Introduction
`
`2. Methods and results
`
`3. Discussion
`
`4.
`
`Expert opinion
`
`For reprint orders, please
`contact:
`Ben.Fisher@informa.com
`
`Key Paper Evaluation
`Is fingolimod an advancement in
`the treatment of multiple
`sclerosis?
`
`Evaluation of: KAPPOS L, ANTEL J, COMI G. et al.: Oral fingolimod (FTY720)
`for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. (2006) 355:1124-1140.
`
`Sheila A Doggrell
`Charles Darwin University, School of Science, Faculty of Education, Health Sciences and Science,
`Darwin, NT0909, Australia
`
`Fingolimod is an agonist at sphringosine-1 phosphate receptors that reduces
`circulating T lymphocytes. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis is
`often used as an animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS), and fingolimod
`prevents or reverses this encephalomyelitis. In subjects with relapsing MS,
`fingolimod reduced the total number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions
`detected by MRI, and the total volume of these lesions at 6 months. The
`annualised relapse rate was 0.77 in the placebo group, and was lowered to
`0.35 and 0.36 in the 1.25- and 5.0-mg fingolimod groups, respectively.
`However, there was no difference in Expanded Disability Status Scale score
`between untreated MS patients and those treated with fingolimod. After
`the 6-month core study, all subjects were treated with fingolimod. The
`annualised relapse rate remained low and the Expanded Disability Status
`Scale score remained steady for up to 24 months. Fingolimod decreased heart
`rate and blood pressure. Given the modest clinical benefits reported to date
`with fingolimod, long-term safety studies need to be undertaken with
`fingolimod to determine whether the benefit/risk profile justifies the routine
`use of fingolimod in subjects with relapsing MS.
`
`Keywords: encephalomyelitis, fingolimod, relapsing multiple sclerosis
`
`Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2007) 8(3):383-386
`
`1.
`
`Introduction
`
`Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, inflammatory, demyelinating disease of
`the CNS. Patients with MS commonly present with an individual mix of
`neuropsychological dysfunction, which tends to progress over years to decades. In
`the US, the incidence of MS is 0.5 – 1.0 per 1000 people. Approximately 70% of
`patients suffer from relapsing-remitting MS, which is characterized by acute
`exacerbations with full or partial remissions. Subjects with relapsing-remitting MS
`are treated with methylprednisolone during exacerbations, and with (cid:69)-IFNs or
`glatiramer acetate (a synthetic form of myelin basic protein) to reduce relapses [101].
`Despite treatment with (cid:69)-IFN or glatiramer, many MS patients still have relapses.
`In MS, CD4+ T cells destroy oligodendrocytes, which synthesise and maintain
`axonal myelin sheathes in the CNS. In autoimmune diseases such as MS, subjects
`harbour, rather than eliminate T cells that can become activated by self-antigens. A
`recent immunotherapeutic approach to treating MS is natalizumab – a monoclonal
`antibody that blocks the adhesion of the (cid:68)4 integrin-dependent adhesion of
`blood-borne encephalitogenic T cells and macrophages to microvessels in the CNS
`(reviewed in [1]). Natalizumab has been trialled in MS and shown to decrease the
`lesions, but JC polyomavirus, a progressive, multifocal leukoencephalopathy has
`developed in three subjects [2].
`
`10.1517/14656566.8.3.383 © 2007 Informa UK Ltd ISSN 1465-6566
`
`383
`
`Apotex v. Novartis
`IPR2017-00854
`NOVARTIS 2036
`
`

`

`Is fingolimod an advancement in the treatment of multiple sclerosis?
`
`is
`immunotherapeutic approach to MS
`Another new
`fingolimod. Fingolimod
`(FTY720, 2-amino-2-(2-[4-octyl-
`phenyl]ethyl)-1,3-propanediol hydrochloride) is a chemical
`derivation of myriocin, a metabolite of the fungus Isaria
`sinclairii, used in Chinese traditional medicine [1,3]. In the
`bloodstream, fingolimod is phosphorylated and resembles
`lysophospholipid sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) [1,3]. S1P has
`at
`least
`five receptors and has roles
`in neurogenesis,
`cardiovascular development, vasoregulation, endothelial-cell
`function and leukocyte migration [1,3]. S1P1 is expressed
`on lymphocytes
`and
`regulates
`lymphocyte migration.
`Fingolimod probably acts as an agonist at the S1P1 receptors,
`and this subsequently leads to an internalization of the receptors
`and reduced lymphocyte migration [1]. It is proposed that in
`MS, fingolimod traps newly generated encephalitogenic T cells
`in the lymph nodes, and hence prevents them from migrating to
`the CNS [1].
`first shown to reduce circulating
`Fingolimod was
`[3]. Acute experimental
`T lymphocyte
`levels
`in
`rats
`autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an inflammatory
`disease of the CNS, which is often used as a model of MS.
`In the EAE model, where rats were immunised with an
`emulsion of bovine spinal cord, fingolimod (started at the
`same time as the immunisation) prevented the development
`of the disease [3]. In another rat model, in which EAE was
`induced with guinea-pig myelin basic protein, fingolimod
`(started at the same time as the immunization) completely
`protected against the disease [4]. The control EAE rats had
`inflammatory
`lesions
`in
`the CNS, which
`the
`fingolimod-treated rats did not have [4]. This protection was
`associated with reduced lymphocytes stained for T-cell
`receptors in the spinal cord [4]. When spleen cells from the
`control EAE rats were transferred to naive recipient rats,
`they developed EAE, whereas the transfer of spleen cells
`from fingolimod-treated EAE rats to naive recipients did not
`transfer the EAE [4].
`More importantly, fingolimod has been shown to be
`effective after the EAE has been established
`in the
`relapsing-remitting EAE model in SJL mice [5]. In this model,
`the EAE is a chronic disease with a relapsing-remitting
`fingolimod caused a
`pattern [5]. In established EAE,
`peripheral
`lymphopenia, and a reversal of changes
`in
`expression of mRNAs encoding some myelin proteins and
`inflammatory markers [5]. Fingolimod also caused a rapid and
`sustained improvement in clinical status [5].
`Recently, a clinical trial of fingolimod in relapsing MS has
`been undertaken, and shown promising results. This trial is
`the subject of this evaluation [6].
`
`2. Methods and results
`
`The methods and results of the Phase II proof-of-concept
`trial, showing that fingolimod reduced lesions in relapsing
`MS [6], are discussed in this section.
`
`2.1 Methods
`The study enroled subjects in 10 European countries, and
`Canada with relapsing MS and one of the following:
`
`(cid:129) Two or more relapses during the previous 2 years
`(cid:129) One or more relapses in the previous 1 year
`(cid:129) One or more gadolinium-enhanced lesions detected by MRI
`
`Gadolinium-enhanced lesions are markers of the active
`nature of MS, regardless of clinical symptoms. Enroled
`subjects also had to have a score of 0 – 6 on the Expanded
`Disability Status Scale (EDSS), in which 10 is the highest
`disability, and have been neurologically stable for 30 days.
`Subjects were excluded
`if
`they had recently
`taken
`corticosteroids,
`immunomodulatory therapy or
`immuno-
`suppressive treatment. Subjects were also excluded if they had
`low white cell or lymphocyte counts. The 277 enroled subjects
`had a mean age of (cid:97) 38 years and were predominantly female
`((cid:97) 70%), with a mean EDSS score of 2.6. Most of the subjects
`had suffered from MS for (cid:97) 9 years, and were having a mean of
`1 – 2 relapses/year.
`In the first 6 months (core study), subjects received either
`placebo, or fingolimod 1.25 or 5.0 mg. Fingolimod is
`administered orally. In the 6-month extension study, subkects
`taking fingolimod continued to take it, and those taking placebo
`were randomised to fingolimod 1.25 or 5.0 mg.
`
`2.2 Results from core study
`The primary efficacy end point was the total number of
`gadolinium-enhanced
`lesions per patient
`recorded on
`T1-weighted MRI, at monthly intervals for 6 months. In the
`placebo group this was a mean of 14.8, but this was reduced to
`8.4 and 5.7 with fingolimod 1.25 and 5.0 mg, respectively.
`Secondary MRI end points included the total volume of
`gadolinium-enhanced lesions per patient and this was 1418 mm3
`in the placebo group, and 715 and 530 mm3 with fingolimod
`1.25 and 5.0 mg, respectively. The proportion of patients with
`gadolinium-enhanced lesions was (cid:97) 50% at baseline, and after
`6 months this had increased to 62% in the placebo group, but
`decreased to 36 and 37% with fingolimod 1.25 and 5.0 mg,
`respectively. The total number of new lesions per patient on
`T2-weighted images, over the 6 months, was 6.4 in the placebo
`group, but only 3.0 and 1.9 with fingolimod 1.25 and 5.0 mg,
`respectively. The change in lesion volume on T2-weighted images
`was an increase of 129 mm3, whereas there was a decrease of 113
`and 627 mm3 with fingolimod 1.25 and 5.0 mg, respectively.
`Relapse was defined as the occurrence of new symptoms or
`worsening of previously stable or improving symptoms, lasting
`> 24 h, and accompanied by an increase of 0.5 in the EDSS
`score, or 1 point in the functional systems. Clinical end points
`included the number of patients remaining free of relapse at 6
`months, which was 66% in the placebo and 86% with both
`fingolimod 1.25 and 5.0 mg. The annualised relapse rate was
`0.77 in the placebo group, and this was lowered to 0.35 and 0.36
`in the fingolimod 1.25- and 5.0-mg groups, respectively. There
`
`384
`
`Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2007) 8(3)
`
`

`

`was no difference in EDSS scores between untreated MS,
`subjects and those treated with fingolimod.
`The first dose of fingolimod caused a decrease in heart rate
`of 13.8 and 16.6 bpm in the 1.25- and 5.0-mg groups,
`respectively. This effect decreased with subsequent doses.
`Mean blood pressure was initially decreased by 5 – 6 mmHg
`with fingolimod, but increased by 4 – 6 mmHg after 2
`months of treatment. Pulmonary function tests showed a
`reduction in forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) of 1.9,
`2.8 and 8.8% in the placebo, fingolimod 1.5- and 5.0-mg
`groups, respectively.
`Both doses of fingolimod caused increases in concentration
`of alanine aminotransferase in 10 and 12% of subjects (with
`1.25 and 5.0 mg, respectively), compared with 1% of subjects
`in the placebo group. This effect of fingolimod decreased with
`continuing treatment, and reversed when fingolimod was
`stopped. Fingolimod caused a 20 – 30% reduction in
`peripheral-blood lymphocyte counts. No serious infections
`were reported.
`Fingolimod 5.0 mg, but not 1.5 mg, increased the
`incidence of nasopharyngitis (placebo, 15%; fingolimod
`5.0 mg, 28%), dyspnea (13 versus 1%), diarrhea (12 versus
`2%), nausea (11 versus 2%). One patient, given fingolimod
`5.0 mg for 10 weeks, developed posterior encephalopathy
`syndrome, which did not resolve completely when fingolimod
`was stopped. The subject was left with a right homonymous
`hemianopia (loss of half vision), associated with left occipital
`hyperintensity, and mild ataxia (loss of coordination)
`remaining at 15 months.
`
`2.3 Results from extension study
`Of the 277 subjects who completed the core study, 250
`continued to the extension study, and continuing benefits
`were observed with fingolimod. Thus, the number of
`gadolinium-enhanced lesions remained low in those treated
`with fingolimod, while falling in those previously treated with
`placebo for 6 months and then fingolimod for 6 months. The
`proportion of patients with gadolinium-enhanced lesions
`continued to fall to 15% and 12% of subjects at 12 months,
`with fingolimod 1.25 and 5.0 mg, respectively. EDSS scores
`did not change over the 12 months.
`The overall incidence of adverse effects was lower in the
`extension study. However, one subject, who changed from
`placebo to fingolimod 5.0 mg, developed facial herpes zoster,
`and another, who changed from placebo to fingolimod 1.5 mg,
`developed enterocolitis.
`
`2.4 Results to 24 months
`The subjects in the fingolimod trial have been followed for
`a further 12 months, and a summary of the results have
`been presented [102]. After 24 months, the number of
`subjects with gadolinium-enhanced lesions remained low
`at 9 – 21% [102]. The annualised relapse rate (0 – 24
`months) remained low in all groups at 0.29 – 0.38 [102].
`The EDSS values remained stable in all groups. The side
`
`Doggrell
`
`influenza
`effects of nasopharyngitis, headache and
`[102]. The
`remained higher with fingolimod 5.0 mg
`open-label extension is to continue, with all subjects
`receiving fingolimod 0.15 mg [102].
`
`3. Discussion
`
`Given that two patients developed serious infections and
`one developed posterior reversible encephalopathy while
`taking fingolimod, larger studies need to be undertaken to
`[6]. In addition, as
`assess the safety of fingolimod
`fingolimod
`increased
`the concentration of alanine
`aminotransferase in some subjects, further studies are
`needed to evaluate any potential liver toxicity [6].
`The authors conclude that oral fingolimod may be a
`treatment option for relapsing MS, but before this can be
`considered for general clinical use, large-scale trials of efficacy
`and safety are needed [6].
`
`4. Expert opinion
`
`4.1 Clinical outcome
`Although there is no clearcut link between gadolinium-enhanced
`lesions and the signs and symptoms of MS, several agents that
`reduce gadolinium-enhanced lesions in MS have also been shown
`to reduce or prevent the decline in EDSS (e.g., IFN-(cid:69)1a [7],
`[8], natalizumab
`[9]). Over 6 months,
`glatiramer acetate
`fingolimod reduced gadolinium-enhanced lesions, but there was
`no difference in EDSS score between untreated MS subjects and
`those treated with fingolimod. It will be of interest as to whether
`there are any long-term improvements, or prevention of decline,
`of the clinical symptoms of MS with prolonged treatment with
`fingolimod. Unfortunately, this could not be determined from
`the extension study, as all subjects were given fingolimod.
`
`4.2 Selective S1P1 agonist
`It has been suggested that the beneficial effects of fingolimod in
`MS are due to interaction with the S1P1, whereas interaction
`with the other S1Ps may underlie the side effects of reduced
`heart rate, increased mean arterial blood pressure and airway
`obstruction [1]. Thus, the ability of fingolimod to decrease heart
`rate is probably due to stimulating the S1P3/G protein-gated
`potassium channel, IKACh [10]. To overcome these side effects, it
`will be necessary to develop drugs that are selective for S1P1,
`and this is already starting to happen. KRP-203 is a selective
`S1P1 agonist being developed for use as an immunosuppressant
`in transplants [11], which did not induce bradycardia in
`the guinea-pig [12].
`
`4.3 Ongoing trials with fingolimod in multiple
`sclerosis
`Fingolimod is now in two large Phase III trials, one comparing
`the 1.25-mg dose with placebo, and the other comparing
`fingolimod with interferon in subjects with MS [102]. A lower
`dose of fingolimod is also to be evaluated [102].
`
`Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2007) 8(3)
`
`385
`
`

`

`Is fingolimod an advancement in the treatment of multiple sclerosis?
`
`4.4 Safety of fingolimod
`Fingolimod
`is also being clinically developed as an
`immunosuppressant for long-term use in transplantation [13,14].
`The safety data from the development of fingolimod for use in
`the treatment of MS and also in transplantation, may be able to
`be combined to determine the safety of fingolimod in large
`numbers of patients.
`
`4.5 Is fingolimod an advancement in the treatment
`of multiple sclerosis?
`Given the modest clinical benefits reported so far with
`fingolimod, long-term safety studies need to be undertaken
`with fingolimod to determine whether the benefit/risk
`profile justifies the routine use of fingolimod in subjects
`with relapsing MS.
`
`Bibliography
`1. MASSBERG S, VON ANDRIAN UH:
`Fingolimod and sphringosine-1-phosphate
`– modifiers of lymphocyte migration.
`N. Engl. J. Med. (2006) 355:1088-1091.
`
`2. DOGGRELL SA: Natalizumab in multiple
`sclerosis: proceed with caution?
`Expert Opin. Pharmacother.
`(2006) 7:1675-1678.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`BRINKMANN V, DAVIS MD, HEISE CS
`et al.: The immune modulation FTY720
`targets sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors.
`J. Biol. Chem. (2002) 277:21453-21457.
`
`FUJINO M, FUNESSHIMA N,
`KITAZAWA Y et al.: Amelioration of
`experimental autoimmune
`encephalomyelitis in Lewis rats by FTY720
`treatment. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
`(2003) 305:70-77.
`
`5. WEBB M, THAM CS, LIN FF et al.:
`Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor agonists
`attenuate relapsing-remitting experimental
`autoimmune encephalitis in SJL mice.
`J. Neuroimmunol. (2004) 153:108-121.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`KAPPOS L, ANTEL J, COMI G et al.:
`Oral fingolimod (FTY720) for relapsing
`multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med.
`(2006) 355:1124-1140.
`
`PRISMS (PREVENTION OF RELAPSES
`AND DISABILITY BY INTERFERON
`BETA-1A SUBCUTANEOUSLY IN
`MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS) STUDY
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`GROUP: Randomised double-blind
`placebo-controlled study of interferon
`beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple
`sclerosis. Lancet (1998) 352:1498-1504.
`
`JOHNSON KP, BROOKS BR, FORD CC
`et al.: Sustained clinical benefits of
`glatiramer acetate in relapsing multiple
`sclerosis patients observed for 6 years.
`Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study
`Group. Mult. Scler. (2000) 6:255-266.
`
`POLMAN CH, O’CONNOR RW,
`HAVRDOVA E et al.: A randomised,
`placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for
`relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med.
`(2006) 354:899-910.
`
`10. KOYRAKH L, ROMAN MI,
`BRINKMANN V, WICKMAN K: The
`heart rate decrease caused by acute FTY720
`administration is mediated by the G
`protein-gated potassium channel IKACh.
`Am. J. Transplant (2005) 5:529-536.
`
`11. FUJISHIRO J, KUDOU S, IWAI S et al.:
`Use of sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor
`agonist, KRP-203, in combination with a
`subtherapeutic dose of cyclosporine A for
`rat renal transplantation. Transplantation
`(2006) 82:804-812.
`
`12.
`
`SHIMIZU H, TAKAHASHI M,
`KANEKO T et al.: KRP-203, a novel
`synthetic immunosuppressant, prolongs
`graft survival and attenuates chronic
`
`rejection in rat skin and heart allografts.
`Circulation (2005) 111:222-229.
`
`13. MULGAONKAR S, TEDESCO H,
`OPPENHEIMER F et al.:
`FTY720/cyclosporine regimens in de nova
`renal transplantation: a 1-year dose-finding
`study. Am. J. Transplant
`(2006) 6:1848-1857.
`
`14.
`
`SALVADORI M, BUDDE K,
`CHARPENTIER B et al.: FTY720 versus
`MMF with cyclosporine in de novo renal
`transplantation: a 1-year, randomized
`controlled trial in Europe and Australasia.
`Am. J. Transplant (2006) 6:2912-2921.
`
`Websites
`
`101. http://www.emdicine.com/emerg/topic321.h
`tm
`Lazoff M: Multiple Sclerosis. Emedicine
`from WebMD (2007).
`
`102. http:www.medscape.com/viewarticle/545804
`_print
`Fingolimod effective to 24 months in
`relapsing MS.
`
`Affiliation
`Sheila A Doggrell
`Charles Darwin University, School of Science,
`Faculty of Education, Health Sciences and
`Science, Darwin, NT0909, Australia
`E-mail: sheila.doggrell@cdu.edu.au
`
`386
`
`Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2007) 8(3)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket