`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 25
`Entered: October 6, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP.,
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.,
`SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., and
`SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS AG.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`Case IPR2017-008541
`Patent US 9,187,405 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER,
`and ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`Revising Due Dates 1–7
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1Cases IPR2017-01550, IPR2017-01946, and IPR2017-01929 have been
`joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00854
`Patent 9,187,405 B2
`
`In response to the October 5, 2017, correspondence from parties relating to
`Patent Owner’s desire to seek an extension of the schedule for IPR2017-00854 and
`consolidated cases in light of the Federal Circuit’s decision in Aqua Products, Inc.
`v. Matal, No. 2015-1177 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2017), we indicated that we would
`postpone Due Date 1 by four weeks to Friday, November 10, 2017, and adjust the
`remaining Due Dates accordingly to avoid inconveniencing either party. See Ex.
`3003.
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Due Dates 1–7 are revised as follows:
`
`DUE DATE 1 .................................................................. November 13, 2017
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ....................................................................... February 2, 2018
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ........................................................................... March 2, 2018
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ......................................................................... March 23, 2018
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`Request for oral argument
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00854
`Patent 9,187,405 B2
`
`DUE DATE 5 ............................................................................. April 6, 2018
`Response to observation
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ........................................................................... April 13, 2018
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ............................................................................ May 11, 2018
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00854
`Patent 9,187,405 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER SUN PHARMA:
`Samuel Park
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`spark@winston.com
`FOR PETITIONER APOTEX:
`Steven W. Parmelee
`Michael T. Rosato
`Jad A. Mills
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`sparmelee@wsgr.com
`mrosato@wsgr.com jmills@wsgr.com
`FOR PETITIONER ARGENTUM:
`Teresa Stanek Rea
`Deborah H. Yellin
`Shannon M. Lentz
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`TRea@Crowell.com
`DYellin@crowell.com
`SLentz@Crowell.com
`Tyler C. Liu
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
`TLiu@agpharm.com
`FOR PETITIONER TEVA:
`Amanda Hollis
`Eugene Goryunov
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`amanda.hollis@kirkland.com
`egoryunov@kirkland.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Jane M. Love
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`jlove@gibsondunn.com
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
