throbber
Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`IPR 2017-00854
`------------------------------)
`APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP.,
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, TEVA
`PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., SUN
`PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,
`SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES,
`INC., and SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE,
` Petitioners,
` PATENT NO.
` vs. 9,187,405
`NOVARTIS A.G.,
` Patent Owner.
`------------------------------)
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
` JEROLD CHUN, M.D., Ph.D.,
` New York, New York
` April 9, 2018
`
`Reported by:
`Linda Salzman
`JOB NO. 140363
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`12
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`8
`
`9
`10
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`25
`
`APOTEX ET AL. - EXHIBIT 1063
`Apotex Inc. et al. v. Novartis AG
`IPR2017-00854
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` April 9, 2018
` 9:00 a.m.
`
` Videotaped Deposition of JEROLD
` CHUN, M.D., Ph.D., the witness
` herein, held at the offices of
` Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, 200 Park
` Avenue, New York, New York, pursuant
` to Notice, before Linda Salzman, a
` Notary Public of the State of New
` York.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
` Attorneys for Petitioner Apotex
` 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
` Seattle, Washington 98104
` BY: JAD MILLS, ESQ.
`
` GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER
` Attorneys for Patent Owner
` 200 Park Avenue
` New York, New York 10166
` BY: ROBERT W. TRENCHARD, ESQ.
` JANE M. LOVE, Ph.D., ESQ.
`
` Also Present:
` LARRY MOSKOWITZ, Videographer
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. 08:24
` This is the start of DVD No. 1 09:03
` of the video-recorded deposition of 09:03
` JEROLD CHUN, M.D., Ph.D., in the 09:03
` matter of Apotex Inc., et al., versus 09:03
` Novartis A.G., in the United States 09:03
` Patent and Trademark Office, before 09:03
` the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. 09:03
` This deposition is being held at 09:03
` Gibson Dunn, 200 Park Avenue, New 09:03
` York, New York, on April 9, 2018 at 09:03
` approximately 9:03 a.m. 09:03
` My name is Larry Moskowitz. I'm 09:03
` the legal video specialist from TSG 09:03
` Reporting, headquartered at 747 Third 09:03
` Avenue, New York, New York. The court 09:03
` reporter is Linda Salzman, also in 09:03
` association with TSG Reporting. 09:03
` Will counsel please introduce 09:04
` themselves for the record. 09:04
` MR. MILLS: My name is Jad 09:04
` Mills. I'm with the law firm of 09:04
` Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. I 09:04
` represent Apotex Inc. and Apotex 09:04
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
` Corp., Petitioners in this matter. 09:04
` MR. TRENCHARD: Robert 09:04
` Trenchard, and with me is my partner, 09:04
` Jane Love. We're from Gibson Dunn, 09:04
` and we represent the Patent Owner, 09:04
` Novartis. 09:04
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the 09:04
` reporter please administer the oath. 09:04
`J E R O L D C H U N,
` called as a witness, having been duly
` sworn by a Notary Public, was examined
` and testified as follows:
`EXAMINATION BY
`MR. MILLS: 09:04
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Chun. 09:04
` A. Good morning. 09:04
` Q. Is this your first deposition? 09:04
` A. Yes. 09:04
` Q. Okay. So I'm going to spend a 09:04
`fair amount of time talking through the 09:04
`process to make sure you understand the 09:04
`way it works and what the rules are so 09:04
`that everyone is comfortable with what's 09:04
`happening today. 09:04
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` A. Thank you. 09:04
` Q. So in a deposition, you just 09:05
`took an oath so you're under oath, the 09:05
`same as you would be if you were in open 09:05
`court in front of a judge. 09:05
` Do you understand that? 09:05
` A. Yes. 09:05
` Q. The way that it works is the 09:05
`court reporter is diligently working to 09:05
`take down every word that you or I or 09:05
`anyone else in the room says. And so we 09:05
`need to be very careful not to speak over 09:05
`one another. And also do our best not to 09:05
`speak too quickly so that she has a tough 09:05
`time taking down the words. 09:05
` Do you understand that? 09:05
` A. Understood. 09:05
` Q. It's also very important that 09:05
`you answer the questions posed to you 09:05
`using an audible response such as "yes" or 09:05
`"no." We don't want any grunts or nodding 09:05
`of head, simply because the court reporter 09:05
`can't put that in the transcript very 09:05
`easily. 09:05
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` A. Understood. 09:05
` Q. Thank you. 09:05
` We want to make sure that 09:06
`there's no confusion about what we're 09:06
`talking about at any point, so if at any 09:06
`point I ask a question and you don't 09:06
`understand what my question is, the 09:06
`expectation is that you will ask for 09:06
`clarification so that we can make sure we 09:06
`understand one another. 09:06
` Do you agree with that? 09:06
` A. Yes. 09:06
` Q. So if you don't ask for 09:06
`clarification, then we will all assume 09:06
`that you understood the question. 09:06
` A. Okay. 09:06
` Q. Okay. 09:06
` If, at any time, your attorney 09:06
`makes an objection -- you know what an 09:06
`objection is? 09:06
` A. Yes. 09:06
` Q. So if he says the word 09:06
`"objection" or begins to speak, that does 09:06
`not relieve you of your obligation to 09:06
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`answer the question that I've posed to 09:06
`you. 09:06
` Understand? 09:06
` A. Understood. 09:06
` Q. During the deposition, you're 09:06
`not supposed to discuss with Novartis's 09:06
`attorneys anything having to do with the 09:07
`case or your testimony today. 09:07
` Do you understand that? 09:07
` A. Understood. 09:07
` Q. And if you do have any 09:07
`discussions with the attorneys that 09:07
`relates to the case or your testimony in 09:07
`any way, then you will have to tell me 09:07
`about what it was that you talked about. 09:07
` Do you understand that? 09:07
` A. Understood. 09:07
` Q. You understand that I represent 09:07
`Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp.? 09:07
` A. I do now. 09:07
` Q. And those are two of the 09:07
`petitioners in this IPR proceeding. 09:07
` A. Okay. 09:07
` Q. Do you know what an IPR 09:07
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`proceeding is? 09:07
` A. Would you explain that to me, 09:07
`please? 09:07
` Q. This is just to make sure there 09:07
`isn't confusion when we use the word IPR. 09:07
`So an IPR proceeding is an administrative 09:07
`challenge to the validity of a patent that 09:07
`takes place before the Patent Office. 09:07
` A. Okay. 09:07
` Q. Does that explanation make sense 09:07
`to you? 09:07
` A. Yes. 09:07
` Q. Are you familiar generally with 09:07
`the concept of a patent? 09:08
` A. Yes. 09:08
` Q. How are you familiar with the 09:08
`concept of a patent, just generally? 09:08
` A. I've been involved with making 09:08
`patents. 09:08
` Q. Okay. Have you ever been 09:08
`involved in a -- let me withdraw that 09:08
`question and start over. 09:08
` When you say you've been 09:08
`involved in making patents, does that mean 09:08
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`you applied for a patent in the past for 09:08
`one of your inventions? 09:08
` A. Yes. 09:08
` Q. And do you understand that the 09:08
`process of applying for a patent and going 09:08
`back and forth with the Patent Office to 09:08
`obtain a patent is called patent 09:08
`prosecution? 09:08
` A. I do now. 09:08
` Q. You recall that process from 09:08
`your own patents, correct? 09:08
` A. Correct. 09:08
` Q. Approximately how many patents 09:08
`have you applied for during your career? 09:08
` A. Approximately five. 09:09
` Q. And did you apply for all of 09:09
`those patents when you were employed at 09:09
`Scripps? 09:09
` A. No. 09:09
` Q. When I use the word "Scripps," 09:09
`do you know what I mean when I say that? 09:09
` A. I believe so. 09:09
` Q. Go ahead and tell me what you 09:09
`understand when I talk about your 09:09
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`employment at Scripps. 09:09
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:09
` form. 09:09
` You can answer. 09:09
` A. The Scripps Research Institute. 09:09
` Q. And where is the Scripps 09:09
`Research Institute located? 09:09
` A. La Jolla, California. 09:09
` Q. So is it okay during the 09:09
`deposition when we use the word "Scripps" 09:09
`that's what we're referring to? Does that 09:09
`make sense? 09:09
` A. Absolutely. 09:09
` Q. Were any of the five patents for 09:09
`which you applied applied for based on 09:09
`your work for Scripps? 09:10
` A. Yes. 09:10
` Q. How many? 09:10
` A. Two perhaps. 09:10
` Q. So for the other three, where 09:10
`were you employed when you conducted the 09:10
`work that led to those other three 09:10
`patents? 09:10
` A. One, I believe, was at the 09:10
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`University of California San Diego, and 09:10
`one or two were at Sanford Burnham Prebys 09:10
`Medical Discovery Institute. 09:10
` Q. And that's Sanford -- 09:10
` A. Sanford, correct. 09:10
` Q. And that's your current place of 09:10
`employment, correct? 09:10
` A. Correct. 09:10
` Q. Do you know whether any patents 09:10
`issued for the five applications that you 09:10
`made? 09:10
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:11
` form. 09:11
` You can answer. 09:11
` A. Yes. 09:11
` Q. How many patents issued from 09:11
`your five applications? 09:11
` A. I believe there were two that 09:11
`issued. 09:11
` Q. Were those the two that you 09:11
`applied for based on your work at Scripps? 09:11
` A. No. One at UCSD, the University 09:11
`of California San Diego. I can't remember 09:11
`where the other one was issued. 09:11
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` I should add an addendum, which 09:11
`is there may have been patents filed from 09:11
`Merck when I was an employee there, but I 09:11
`don't recall if any were filed, actually 09:11
`filed with my name on it or granted in the 09:11
`company. 09:11
` Q. When were you employed at Merck? 09:11
` A. From approximately 2001 through 09:11
`2003. 09:11
` Q. Can you put any finer time 09:12
`period; a month or a time of year? 09:12
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:12
` form. 09:12
` You can answer. 09:12
` A. I don't recall the actual dates. 09:12
` Q. For the UCSD patent that issued, 09:12
`generally what was the subject matter of 09:12
`that patent? 09:12
` A. Lysophospholipid receptors. 09:12
` Q. Is S1P1 an example of a 09:12
`lysophospholipid receptor? 09:12
` A. Correct. 09:12
` Q. And Dr. Chun, you are a 09:12
`discoverer of the lysophospholipid 09:12
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`receptors, correct? 09:13
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:13
` form and scope. 09:13
` You can answer. 09:13
` A. Yes. 09:13
` Q. Your discovery of 09:13
`lysophospholipid receptors is an important 09:13
`part of your career, correct? 09:13
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:13
` form, scope and relevance. 09:13
` You can answer. 09:13
` A. Correct. 09:13
` Q. It was a major achievement of 09:13
`yours, correct? 09:13
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same three 09:13
` objections. 09:13
` You can answer. 09:13
` A. Correct. 09:13
` Q. Your discovery of 09:13
`lysophospholipid receptors is an example 09:13
`of a major contribution that you 09:13
`personally made to the advancement of 09:13
`science, correct? 09:13
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same three 09:13
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` objections. 09:13
` You can answer. 09:13
` A. Could you clarify that question, 09:13
`please? 09:13
` Q. Which part of the question do 09:14
`you think -- are you having trouble with? 09:14
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same three 09:14
` objections. 09:14
` You can answer. 09:14
` A. Could you please restate the 09:14
`question? 09:14
` Q. Okay. 09:14
` So my question was your 09:14
`discovery of lysophospholipid receptors is 09:14
`an example of a major contribution that 09:14
`you personally made to the advancement of 09:14
`science, correct? 09:14
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:14
` form, scope and relevance. 09:14
` You can answer. 09:14
` A. Yes. 09:14
` Q. It was a pretty big deal, right? 09:14
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same three 09:14
` objections. 09:14
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` You can answer. 09:14
` A. It's science. 09:14
` Q. And your contribution to science 09:14
`was a big deal in the advancements of 09:14
`science, correct? 09:14
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection. Same 09:14
` three objections; form, scope and 09:14
` relevance. 09:14
` You can answer. 09:14
` A. It contributed to science. 09:14
` Q. You agree, Dr. Chun, that many 09:14
`trees have died publishing papers based on 09:15
`your work with phospholipid receptors, 09:15
`correct? 09:15
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:15
` form. 09:15
` You can answer. 09:15
` A. No. 09:15
` Q. Okay. Go ahead and tell me 09:15
`what's wrong with the statement. 09:15
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same three 09:15
` objections. 09:15
` You can answer. 09:15
` A. Electronic publication does not 09:15
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`kill trees. 09:15
` Q. Okay. So you would agree with 09:15
`me that you personally have many 09:15
`publications based on your work with 09:15
`lysophospholipid receptors, correct? 09:15
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:15
` form, scope and relevance. 09:15
` You can answer. 09:15
` A. I have published in this field. 09:15
` Q. Approximately how many 09:15
`publications have you published based on 09:15
`your work with lysophospholipid receptors? 09:16
` A. Approximately 100 to 200. 09:16
` Q. Approximately what is your total 09:16
`publication count? 09:16
` A. Approximately 300. 09:16
` Q. So you would agree that between 09:16
`one-third and two-thirds of your personal 09:16
`body of scientific work is directed to 09:16
`your work on lysophospholipid receptors, 09:16
`correct? 09:16
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:16
` form, scope and relevance. 09:16
` You can answer. 09:16
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` A. It involves that area of study. 09:16
` Q. Approximately what percentage of 09:16
`your publications are directed 09:17
`specifically to S1P receptors? 09:17
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:17
` form, scope and relevance. You can 09:17
` answer. 09:17
` A. Approximately one-fourth of 09:17
`those dealing with lysophospholipid 09:17
`receptors. 09:17
` Q. And of the other three-quarters, 09:17
`what generally was their subject matter? 09:17
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:17
` form, scope and relevance. 09:17
` You can answer. 09:17
` A. Other lysophospholipid 09:17
`receptors. 09:17
` Q. Can you please list for me all 09:17
`lysophospholipid receptors about which 09:17
`you've published more frequently than S1P 09:17
`receptors? 09:17
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:17
` form, scope and relevance. 09:17
` You can answer. 09:17
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` A. Lysophosphatidic acid receptor 09:17
`1, or LPA1, LPA2, LPA3, LPA4, LPA5, LPA6. 09:18
` And in addition, other receptors 09:18
`that have been reported in the literature, 09:18
`LPI, LPS1, LPS2, LPS3, and there may be 09:18
`one or two others that are in that group. 09:19
` Q. Dr. Chun, that group of LPA1 09:19
`through LPA6, and LPI and LPS1 through 3, 09:19
`are you saying that as a group your 09:19
`publications about those receptors make up 09:19
`a greater percentage of your publications 09:19
`than the S1P receptor or that each 09:19
`individual one does? 09:19
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:19
` form, scope and relevance. 09:19
` A. Please restate the question. 09:19
` Q. So originally my question was 09:19
`one-quarter of your lysophospholipid 09:20
`receptor publications are about S1P. So 09:20
`is there any other lysophospholipid 09:20
`receptor which you published more 09:20
`frequently than S1Ps? 09:20
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:20
` form, scope and relevance. 09:20
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` You can answer. 09:20
` A. That list that I gave you 09:20
`constitutes the other receptors. 09:20
` Q. So that list of 10 receptors is 09:20
`the other 75 percent? 09:20
` A. Approximately. 09:20
` Q. And I won't hold you to a high 09:20
`degree of precision on the percentage of 09:20
`publications, we're just trying to get a 09:20
`sense. 09:20
` Of those 10 receptors, how many 09:20
`of them constitute the subject matter of 09:20
`more than 25 percent of your 09:20
`lysophospholipid receptor publications? 09:21
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:21
` form, scope and relevance. 09:21
` You can answer. 09:21
` A. Approximately 25 percent, was 09:21
`that the question? 09:21
` Q. So do any of those 10 exceed the 09:21
`25 percent threshold that applies to S1P? 09:21
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:21
` form, scope and relevance. 09:21
` A. I'm not sure. Possibly LPA1. 09:21
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` Q. Of those 10 other phospholipid 09:21
`receptors that you have identified, has 09:21
`your work on those receptors led to the 09:21
`FDA approval of a new drug? 09:21
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:22
` form, scope and relevance. 09:22
` You can answer. 09:22
` A. Would you clarify "FDA 09:22
`approval"? 09:22
` Q. Let me ask you, what's your 09:22
`understanding of the phrase "FDA 09:22
`approval"? 09:22
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same objections. 09:22
` You can answer. 09:22
` A. Do you mean has become an 09:22
`FDA-approved medicine, or do you mean FDA 09:22
`has approved some stage of clinical work? 09:22
` Q. So let's start with the first 09:22
`definition, where there's a marketing 09:22
`approval from FDA. 09:22
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same objections. 09:22
` You can answer. 09:22
` A. None have been approved. 09:22
` Q. With regard to your work on S1P 09:22
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`receptors, has that resulted in the FDA 09:22
`approval of any medicines? 09:22
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:22
` form, scope and relevance. 09:23
` You can answer. 09:23
` A. Yes. 09:23
` Q. How many medicines? 09:23
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same objections. 09:23
` You can answer. 09:23
` A. One. 09:23
` Q. And what medicine is that? 09:23
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same objections. 09:23
` You can answer. 09:23
` A. Fingolimod, also known as 09:23
`FTY720. 09:23
` Q. Other than Fingolimod, is there 09:23
`any other FDA -- any other medicine that's 09:23
`been approved by the FDA that was 09:23
`developed based on your work? 09:23
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:23
` form, scope and relevance. 09:23
` You can answer. 09:23
` A. Could you clarify that? By my 09:23
`"work," are you referring to 09:23
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`lysophospholipid receptors or something 09:23
`else? 09:23
` Q. Thank you for asking for that 09:23
`clarification. Let's begin with 09:23
`lysophospholipid receptors. 09:23
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same objections. 09:23
` You can answer. 09:24
` A. Not to my knowledge. 09:24
` Q. Approximately what percentage of 09:24
`your publications -- that was the 1 to 200 09:24
`was lysophospholipid receptors? 09:24
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:24
` form. 09:24
` A. Correct. 09:24
` Q. Dr. Chun, is it correct that 09:24
`your involvement in the FDA approval of 09:24
`Fingolimod was limited to the basic 09:24
`scientific research into S1P receptors? 09:24
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:24
` form, scope and relevance. 09:24
` You can answer. 09:24
` A. Correct. 09:24
` Q. Other than performing basic 09:25
`research that ultimately resulted in 09:25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`Fingolimod, did you have any involvement 09:25
`in preclinical trials for Fingolimod? 09:25
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:25
` form, scope and relevance. 09:25
` You can answer. 09:25
` A. No. 09:25
` Q. Did you have any involvement in 09:25
`human clinical trials for Fingolimod? 09:25
` A. No. 09:25
` Q. Dr. Chun, have you had any 09:25
`involvement with postmarketing and 09:25
`commercial activities of Fingolimod? 09:25
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:25
` form, scope and relevance. 09:25
` You can answer. 09:25
` A. Would you clarify 09:25
`"postmarketing"? 09:25
` Q. Yeah, and I'll actually tell you 09:26
`what I'm talking about, because I'm a 09:26
`little confused based on your answers just 09:26
`now. 09:26
` So I'm reading from your CV. 09:26
`And it says, referring to Dr. Chun, "He 09:26
`participated in all major stages of the 09:26
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
`development of Fingolimod (Gilenya, 09:26
`Novartis) from basic science, preclinical 09:26
`studies through postmarketing and 09:26
`commercial activities." 09:26
` A. Correct. 09:26
` Q. So it's true that you 09:26
`participated in all major stages of the 09:26
`development of Fingolimod? 09:26
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:26
` form, scope and relevance. 09:26
` You can answer. 09:26
` A. Would you restate that question, 09:26
`please? 09:26
` Q. It's true that you participated 09:26
`in all major stages of the development of 09:26
`Fingolimod? 09:26
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:27
` form, scope and relevance. 09:27
` You can answer. 09:27
` A. "Participated" is correct. 09:27
` Q. Is it correct that you 09:27
`participated in the human clinical trials 09:27
`of Fingolimod? 09:27
` MR. TRENCHARD: Same objections. 09:27
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` J. Chun, M.D., Ph.D.
` You can answer. 09:27
` A. Participated as distinguished 09:27
`from actually conducting. Are you making 09:27
`that distinction? 09:27
` Q. Well, I'm just trying to find 09:27
`out what the distinction is, so why don't 09:27
`you go ahead and tell me what the 09:27
`distinction is -- so go ahead and tell me 09:27
`what distinction you're making. 09:27
` A. Participation means everything 09:27
`from discussion to, in the case of 09:27
`preclinical basic science work, actually 09:27
`conducting work. But it's a very broad 09:28
`term. 09:28
` Q. Is it correct that your only 09:28
`scientific work regarding the development 09:28
`of Fingolimod occurred at the preclinical 09:28
`stage? 09:28
` MR. TRENCHARD: Objection to 09:28
` form, scope and relevance. 09:28
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket