`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 46
`Entered: January 31, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP.,
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.,
`SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., and
`SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS AG.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`Case IPR2017-008541
`Patent US 9,187,405 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER,
`and ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`Revising Due Dates 2–6
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Cases IPR2017-01550, IPR2017-01946, and IPR2017-01929 have been
`joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00854
`Patent 9,187,405 B2
`According to emails received and/or forwarded by Petitioner Apotex, the
`parties are unable to agree on changes to DUE DATES 2 through 5 as permitted in
`our initial scheduling order. See Paper 12, 1. The panel acknowledges that
`scheduling is complicated by briefing related to Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend
`and potential discovery. To accommodate this briefing, and any potential new
`discovery, each of DUE DATES 2 through 6 are hereby extended by two weeks.
`Due Date 7 is unchanged.
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the remaining DUE DATES for this case
`are as follows:
`
`DUE DATE 2 ...................................................................... February 16, 2018
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 .......................................................................... March 16, 2018
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 .............................................................................. April 6, 2018
`Observations regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ............................................................................. April 20, 2018
`Response to observations
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ........................................................................... April 27, 2018
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00854
`Patent 9,187,405 B2
`DUE DATE 7 ............................................................................ May 11, 2018
`Oral argument (if requested).
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER APOTEX:
`
`Steven W. Parmelee
`Michael T. Rosato
`Jad A. Mills
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`sparmelee@wsgr.com
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`jmills@wsgr.com
`
`FOR PETITIONER ARGENTUM:
`
`Teresa Stanek Rea
`Deborah H. Yellin
`Shannon M. Lentz
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`trea@crowell.com
`dyellin@crowell.com
`slentz@crowell.com
`
`Tyler C. Liu
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
`tliu@agpharm.com
`
`FOR PETITIONER TEVA:
`
`Amanda Hollis
`Eugene Goryunov
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`Amanda.hollis@kirkland.com
`egoryunov@kirkland.com
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00854
`Patent 9,187,405 B2
`FOR PETITIONER SUN PHARMA:
`
`Samuel Park
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`spark@winston.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jane M. Love
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`jlove@gibsondunn.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
