throbber

 
`
`       ! " #$$%
`
` &$# '    (   ( &# 
`
`) *******************************************************
`
`+ #, %-. #, %#-. ! ' ! %% ( ((%.
` % / (0 &' ((%. / ' ! %% (  . %-.
`  ' ! %% (   . (-.  ' ! %% (
`   . %-.   ' ! (#& ( $0.
`1 
`
` 2.
`
` 3-
`
` #/  --.
`   # -
` ********************************************************
`
`  +
`   - ..+
` ********************************************************
`
` % (( ' ' &# 
` ********************************************************
`
`)
`
`+ 4   $
`5 6 3 7. 7
`  
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`+
`
`
`
`  . 26
`

`
`  "8 9 7: . 
`
`# &;8 " '( ' !(#. . %. %% 
`
`  
`

`   
`<=>?@AB@?B<CDBEB@AFGHG?BIJKL
`<MNOPQBGRSDBPOBTUDBVDBWNVTXOYZB<[BBG=\]JI^EJJ_`K
`
`

`

`A P P E A R A N C E S
`      % 
`
`
 
`
`
`
`)
`
`TELEPHONICALLY FOR THE BOARD:
`('#% ((; $# ' &# 8
`JUDGE POLLOCK
` 9 #((#%"
`JUDGE GREEN
`+ 9 
`JUDGE KAISER
` 9 "  
`
`IL 60601
`
` 1
`
`FOR THE PETITIONER APOTEX:
`$# ' # #,8
`STEVEN PARMELEE, ESQ.
` /  !(.  a-
`JAD MILLS, ESQ.
` 9  !(( .  a-
`MICHAEL ROSATO, ESQ.
` !%' ( # #.  a-
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
` 
`2  2
`
` 
`b6 c 2
`
`701 Fifth Avenue
`  $
`5 6 3 7
`Seattle, WA 98104
`  .  +
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`TELEPHONICALLY FOR THE PETITIONER ARGENTUM:
`+ ('#% ((; $# ' # !8
`TERESA REA, ESQ.
`   .  a-
`SHANNON LENTZ, ESQ.
` ' # (0.  a-
`Crowell
`& Moring
`1 % c !
`

`1001 Pennsylvania Ave Northwest
`   2:3
` 3  62
`Washington, DC 20004
` 26
`
 . % +
`
`
`
`
`
`TELEPHONICALLY FOR THE PETITIONER SUN:
` ('#% ((; $# ' # 8
`SAMUEL PARK, ESQ.
` !(  ".  a-
`Winston & Strawn
` 
` 2  c 
`35 West Wacker Drive
` ) 2 b4 
`3
`Chicago,
` %6
`b
. ( 11
`
`)
`
`+
`
`
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`
 )
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S
`(CONTINUED)
`      %  d%#e
`
`
`
`TELEPHONICALLY FOR THE PETITIONER TEVA:
`('#% ((; $# ' # / 8
`
`)
`
`GREGORY SPRINGSTED, ESQ.
` #;  .  a-
`Kirkland & Ellis
`+ "
`4  c 
`2
`300 North LaSalle
` )  6 ( 
`Chicago,
`IL 60654
` %6
`b
. ( 11+
`
`1  
`
`TELEPHONICALLY FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
`('#% ((; $# '   #8
`ROBERT TRENCHARD, ESQ.
` #& %' .  a-
`JANE LOVE, ESQ.
` 9  (#/.  a-
`Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
` 
`f2 7 c %7 b6
`200 Park Avenue
`  4 3 7
`  ;4. ; 11
`
`New York, NY 10166
`
` g g g g g
`
`
`
`)
`
`+
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`+
`
`
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`CALL WITH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`SEATTLE, WASHINGTON;
`JANUARY 10, 2018
`  (.  '#h 9  ; . 
`8:00 a.m.
`) 8 -i-
`—oOo—
`+ 
`
`
 +
`
` 1
`
`JUDGE POLLOCK: This call is in relation to
` 9 #((#%"8 6
`2 b
`2
` 
` 
`IPR2017—OO854. This is Judge Pollock.
`I have with me
`  +- 6
`2
`2 97
 b4-  63 
` 6 i
`Judges Green and Kaiser.
` 97
2    "
`2-
`I would like to start with a roll call.
`Go
`  7 
`4  2  
` 6   b- 
`ahead for petitioner.
` 6 5 
`
` -
`MR. PARMELEE: Good morning, your Honors.
` !-  !(8  i
`
. :7 ' 2-
`This is Steve Parmelee and Jad Mills for petitioner
` 6
`2
`2 3 i   9 !
`2 5 
`
` 
`Apotex.
`)  j-
`
`
`
`MS. REA: Good morning. This is Teri Rea
`+ ! -  8  i
`
- 6
`2
`2 
` 
`and Shannon Lentz on behalf of petitioner Argentum.
`   6  ( k  f65 5 
`
`  
 7i-
`MR. PARK: Good morning. This is Sam Park
`1 !-  "8  i
`
- 6
`2
`2 i 4
`on behalf of petitioner Sun Pharmaceutical.
`  f65 5 
`
`  7 6ib7
`b-
`MR. SPRINGSTED: Good morning. This is
` !-  8  i
`
- 6
`2
`2
`Gregory Springsted on behalf of petitioners Actavis and
` 
: 
`
2   f65 5 
`
` 2 b 3
`2  
`Teva.
` 3-
`
`JUDGE POLLOCK: Anyone else? Very good.
` 9 #((#%"8 :  2l /:
-
`Is there a court reporter on the line?
` 2 6  b7    6 
` l
`MR. PARMELEE: Yes, your Honor, we do have a
`) !-  !(8 ;2. :7 ' .   63 
`court reporter on the line.
`+ b7    6 
` -
`JUDGE POLLOCK: And who engaged the court
` 9 #((#%"8  6 

 6 b7
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`CALL WITH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`reporter?
`  l
`
`
 
`
`
`
`MR. PARMELEE: Petitioner Apotex.
`) !-  !(8 
`
`   j-
`JUDGE POLLOCK: Very good.
`If Apotex would
`+ 9 #((#%"8 /:
- 5  j 7
`submit a copy of the transcript as an exhibit when it's
` 27fi
`  b: 5 6  2b
` 2  j6
`f
` 6
` m2
`available,
`that would be fine.
`1 3
`f. 6 7 f 5
` -
`MR. PARMELEE: Certainly we will.
` !-  !(8 % 
` :  
`-
`JUDGE POLLOCK: Petitioners requested this
` 9 #((#%"8 
`
` 2 n72  6
`2
`call regarding the routine or additional discovery of
` b 

`
6 7
`   
`
`  
`2b3: 5
`FDA minutes of the February 2, 2005, meeting between the
` $ i
` 7 2 5 6 $f7: . . i
`
f  6
`FDA and Novartis, which is referenced in Exhibit 2066
` $   3
`2. 6
`b6
`2 5 b
` j6
`f
` 11
`and at paragraph 55 of Dr. Lublin's second deposition
`    
6  5 - (7f
` m2 2b  2
`
`
`which quotes Exhibit 2066;
`two, a briefing book for the
`) 6
`b6 n7 2 j6
`f
` 11h .  f
`5
`
f4 5 6
`March 26th, 2007, end of phase two meeting, which is
`+ !b6 1 6. .   5 62  i
`
. 6
`b6
`2
`referenced in Exhibit 2064, which itself is referenced
` 5 b
` j6
`f
` 1+. 6
`b6
` 25
`2 5 b
`via paragraph 46 of Dr. Lublin's second declaration; and
`1 3
` 
6 +1 5 - (7f
` m2 2b  b
` h  
`an unredacted copy of 2063, which is cited at paragraphs
`  7 b  b: 5 1). 6
`b6
`2 b
`   
62
`52 and 56 of Dr. Lublin's second declaration.
`    1 5 - (7f
` m2 2b  b
` -
`Petitioner, would you like to begin?
` 
`
` . 7 :7 
`4  f

` l
`MR. PARMELEE: Yes, your Honor.
`I just want
` !-  !(8 ;2. :7 ' -  o72 
`to confirm that counsel for patent owner is on the line.
`  b 5
`i 6 b7 2 5    
`2  6 
` -
`I didn't hear them introduce themselves.
`  
` m 6 6i
` 7b 6i232-
`JUDGE POLLOCK: Oh,
`I'm sorry. My mistake.
`) 9 #((#%"8 #6. mi 2:- !: i
`2 4-
`Is counsel for patent owner there?
`+ 2 b7 2 5     6l
`MR. TRENCHARD: We are, your Honor. This is
` !- %' 8  . :7 ' - 6
`2
`2
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`CALL WITH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`Bob Trenchard and Jane Love from Gibson Dunn for the
` &f  b6   9  (3 5i 
`f2 7 5 6
`patent owner.
`)    -
`JUDGE POLLOCK: My apologies. Well, good
`+ 9 #((#%"8 !: 

`2- .

`morning.
` i
`
-
`
`
 1
`
`MR. TRENCHARD: Good morning, your Honor.
`1 !- %' 8  i
`
. :7 ' -
`JUDGE POLLOCK: Petitioner.
` 9 #((#%"8 
`
` -
`MR. PARMELEE:
`Sure. Yeah,
`thank you, your
` !-  !(8 7- ;6. 6 4 :7. :7
`
` ' -
`
`was filed on November 13th, 2017.
`
`Regarding the —— you've gone through the
` 

`
6 :7m3
  67
6 6
`three documents that we identified. We think it's a
` 6 b7i 2 6 
`
`5
`-  6
` 4
` m2 
`pretty straightforward matter on these three,
`so let me
`  : 2 
`
6 5 i   62 6. 2  i
`touch on each of them what they are, and you've already
`) 7b6  b6 5 6i 6 6: .   :7m3 :
`identified where they're referred to in the patent owner
`+
`
`5
` 6 6:m 5 
` 6    
`expert declaration. We also have cites where patent
` j b
` -  2 63 b
` 2 6  
`owner relies on them in the patent owner response that
`1   
`2  6i
` 6     2 2 6
`|_\ \l
` 2 5
`  3if ) 6. -
`|_\ 00
`
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`CALL WITH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`
`
 
`
`
`
`+ 5b
`
` 
`
`
`JUDGE POLLOCK: Does the —— the expert
` 9 #((#%"8 2 6 6 j
`report is citing another document, 2066, which quotes an
`1 
`2 b
`
`
  6 b7i . 11. 6
`b6 n7 2 
`excerpt of that.
`So Dr. Lublin I don't see had access
` jb 5 6 -  - (7f
`   m 2 6 bb22
`to the entire minutes;
`is that correct?
`  6 
` i
` 7 2h
`2 6 bb l
`MR. PARMELEE: Well,
`they're citing to in
` !-  !(8 . 6:m b
`
`

`
`20 —— they're actually citing to the FDA, quoting from
`  6:m b 7: b
`
`
 6 $ . n7
`
5i
`the FDA minutes that are quoted in the exhibit that they
` 6 $ i
` 7 2 6  n7 
` 6 j6
`f
` 6 6:
`do provide.
`So basically they're trying to immunize
`  3
`-  f2
`b: 6:m :
`

`ii7
`k
`from production the underlying FDA minutes by having
`) 5i 7b
` 6 7 :
`
$ i
` 7 2 f: 63
`

`Dr. Lublin provide us a snippet from that document and
`+ - (7f
` 3
` 72  2
` 5i 6 b7i  
`not addressing the entirety of the FDA minutes. And
`  22
`
6 
` : 5 6 $ i
` 7 2- 
`certainly it's relied on in the patent owner response as
`1 b 
` :
` m2 
` 
` 6     2 2 2
`well.
` -
`
`
`
`JUDGE POLLOCK: All right. Please continue.
` 9 #((#%"8  
`
6 - 2 b
` 7-
`MR. PARMELEE:
`Sure.
`I don't know if you
` !-  !(8 7-   m 4 
`5 :7
`wanted me to discuss where they're also relying on
`   i  
`2b722 6 6:m 2 :
`

`these,
`this material in the patent owner response, but
` 62. 6
`2 i 
`
` 6     2 2. f7
`that's at pages 26 to 27 citing the Lublin declaration
` 6 m2  
2 1   b
`
`
6 (7f
` b
`
`discussing these exhibits.
`) 
`2b722
`
62 j6
`f
` 2-
`JUDGE POLLOCK: Okay.
`+ 9 #((#%"8 #4:-
`MR. PARMELEE:
`The second document that we
` !-  !(8 6 2b  b7i 6 
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`
 
`
`CALL WI TH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`believe should have been produced as routine discovery
` f
`3 267 63 f 7b 2 7
`  
`2b3:
`is this briefing book for the March 22nd, 2007, meeting
`)
`2 6
`2 f
`5
`
f4 5 6 !b6  . . i
`

`with the FDA.
`It's a document that Novartis apparently
`+ 
` 6 6 $ -  m2  b7i 6 3
`2  :
`prepared for a meeting with the FDA and it's described
`  5  i
`

` 6 6 $  
` m2 2b
`f
`in Exhibit 2064 at page 1 which quotes from the briefing
`1
` j6
`f
` 1+  
  6
`b6 n7 2 5i 6 f
`5
`

`book with big block quotes.
` f4 
` 6 f
`
fb4 n7 2-
`
`
`
`
`
` 6
`2
`discussion carries over to paragraph 47 in the Lublin
`+ 
`2b722
` b
`2 3  
6 +
` 6 (7f
`
`declaration as well. And in the patent owner response,
` b
` 2 - 
` 6     2 2.
`patent owner relies on this discussion by Dr. Lublin in
`1     
`2  6
`2 
`2b722
` f: - (7f
`
`
`the first paragraph on page 26, which cites these
` 6 5
`2 
6  
 1. 6
`b6 b
` 2 62
`portions of the Lublin declaration.
` 
` 2 5 6 (7f
` b
` -
`Therefore, because it is cited and relied
` 65. fb72
`
`2 b
`    
`
`on, we believe that document,
`the briefing book, should
`  .  f
`3 6 b7i . 6 f
`5
`
f4. 267
`have been produced to us as a matter of routine
` 63 f 7b  72 2  i  5 7
` 
`discovery.
` 
`2b3:-
`
`The third document that we've asked for as a
`) 6 6
` b7i 6 m3 24 5 2 
`matter of routine discovery is the heavily redacted copy
`+ i  5 7
`  
`2b3:
`2 6 63
`: b  b:
`of 2063 which is a partial e—mail chain involving
` 5 1) 6
`b6
`2  
`  i
` b6
`
` 33
`

`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`CALL WITH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`
`
 
`
`
`
`— I don't know
`   m 4 
`that we need to get into where this document is referred
`+ 6   

`  6 6
`2 b7i
`2 5
`to in Dr. Lublin's declaration.
`The patent owner itself
` 
` - (7f
` m2 b
` - 6    
` 25
`relies on it and quotes directly from it at the bottom
`1 
`2 
`   n7 2 
`b : 5i
`  6 f i
`of page 26.
` 5 
 1-
`
`
`
`We think that there is a protective order in
`  6
` 4 6 6
`2   b
`3 
`
`this case. Certainly Exhibit 2063 is stamped as
` 6
`2 b2- % 
` : j6
`f
` 1)
`2 2 i 2
`protective order material, yet the document is heavily
`  b
`3  i 
`. : 6 b7i
`2 63
`:
`redacted and we think we should be provided with an
` b     6
` 4  267 f 3
` 
` 6 
`unredacted copy of the document.
` 7 b  b: 5 6 b7i -
`(Telephonic interruption.)
`) d6
`b
` 7
` -e
`MR. PARMELEE:
`So I guess on these three
`+ !-  !(8  
722  62 6
`documents we think it's a pretty straightforward case of
` b7i 2  6
` 4
` m2   : 2 
`
6 5 b2 5
`documents that should have been produced as routine
`1 b7i 2 6 267 63 f 7b 2 7
` 
`discovery under rule 42.51(b)(l). They're documents
` 
`2b3: 7  7 +-dfede- 6:m b7i 2
`that are referred to and relied on in the patent owner
` 6  5    
` 
` 6    
`response and in at least one declaration.
` 2 2  
`  2   b
` -
`We don't think that the patent owner should
`   m 6
` 4 6 6     267
`be able to withhold them or shield these documents
` f f  
` 66 6i  26
` 62 b7i 2
`simply because they've chosen not to assign an exhibit
` 2
`i: fb72 6:m3 b62   22
`
 j6
`f
`
`number to them. That's not what rule 42.51 says.
`) 7if  6i- 6 m2  6 7 +- 2:2-
`Basically it amounts to a trial by snippet rather than
`+ &2
`b:
` i7 2   
` f: 2
`  6 6
`allowing the parties to see the documents that they're
` 
`
6 
`2  2 6 b7i 2 6 6:m
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`CALL WI TH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`relying on.
` :
`
 -
`
`
 
`
`So we ask for these materials —— sorry. We
`)   24 5 62 i 
`2 2:- 
`have asked for these materials from the patent owner in
`+ 63 24 5 62 i 
`2 5i 6    
`
`advance of the depositions that were held in December.
` 3 b 5 6 2
`
` 2 6  6
` bif-
`They refused and they continue to refuse. We've
`1 6: 572   6: b
` 7  572- m3
`actually been prejudiced by our inability to have these
` b 7: f o7
`b f: 7
` f
`
` :  63 62
`documents prior to those depositions, and so we ask that
` b7i 2 
`  62 2
`
` 2.   2  24 6
`the board now order them to be produced to us without
` 6 f   6i  f 7b  72 
` 67
`any further delay.
`  : 57 6 :-
`JUDGE POLLOCK: All right. Patent owner, on
` 9 #((#%"8  
`
6 -    . 
`what basis do you oppose this requested discovery? Also
` 6 f2
`2  :7 2 6
`2 n72  
`2b3:l 2
`given that Dr. Lublin expressly relies on Exhibit 2063,
`)

`3 6 - (7f
` j22: 
`2  j6
`f
` 1).
`perhaps you can explain the reasons for the redaction.
`+ 62 :7 b j
` 6 2 2 5 6 b
` -
`|_\ 01
`MR. TRENCHARD:
`Sure, your Honor.
`I'm happy
` !- %' 8 7. :7 ' - mi 6:
`|_\ ON
`1  2  6-
`
`to start there.
`
`
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`CALL WITH BOARD
`|_\
` % (( ' &# 
`
`
 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
`
`The parts that's redacted —— and we have
` 6  2 6 m2 b     63
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`
 
`
`CALL WI TH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`given the petitioners a declaration from our in—house
`

`3 6 
`
` 2  b
` 5i 7
` 672
`counsel on this issue.
`The part that's redacted is ——
`) b7 2  6
`2
`227- 6  6 m2 b 
`2
`is not part of the e—mail chain between Mount Sinai and
`+
`2   5 6  i
` b6
` f  !7
` 
`  
`Novartis, which is the document that Dr. Lublin relies
` 3
`2. 6
`b6
`2 6 b7i 6 - (7f
` 
`2
`on —— documents,
`those are the documents he relies on,
`1  b7i 2. 62  6 b7i 2 6 
`2  .
`but rather additional internal e—mails within Novartis
` f7  6 
`
` 
`    i
`2 
` 6
` 3
`2
`related to or connected to the back—and—forth with Mount
`     b b   6 fb4   5 6 
` 6 !7
`Sinai. But since Dr. Lublin was only talking about the
`
` 
`- &7 2
` b - (7f
` 2  : 4
`
f7 6
`back—and—forth between Mount Sinai and Novartis,
`that
` fb4   5 6 f  !7
` 
`   3
`2. 6
`seemed or those seemed the relevant documents and those
` 2i  62 2i 6 3 b7i 2   62
`are the ones that we produced.
`  6  2 6  7b-
`It so happened that we found them in our
`)  2 6  6  57  6i
` 7
`e—mail system just by happenstance attached to later
`+  i
` 2:2 i o72 f: 6 2  b  b6   
`e—mails that have no bearing on Dr. Lublin's analysis,
`  i
`2 6 63  f
`
 - (7f
` m2  :2
`2.
`and he has never seen them, and they have no connection
`1   6 62 3 2 6i.   6: 63  b b
`
`to his opinions in the case.
`They relate to, as I said,
`  6
`2 
`
` 2
` 6 b2- 6:   . 2  2
`.
`additional discussions amongst internal Novartis folks
` 
`
`  
`2b722
` 2 i
2
`   3
`2 542
`that have no bearing on the purpose for which this is
` 6 63  f
`
 6 72 5 6
`b6 6
`2
`2
`introduced.
`
` 7b-
`
`
`
`So that's why that stuff was —— another way
`  6 m2 6: 6 2 755 2   6 :
`to look at this would be if we happened to pick up a
`  4  6
`2 7 f
`5  6   
`b4 7 
`different version of this e—mail chain that was earlier
`) 
`55 32
` 5 6
`2  i
` b6
` 6 2 
`
`in the back—and—forth, it would have omitted all of the
`+
` 6 fb4   5 6.
` 7 63 i
`   5 6
`internal Novartis chatter and have included only what
`
`   3
`2 b6    63
` b7  : 6
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`
 )
`
`
`
`CALL WI TH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`Dr. Lublin discussed in his declaration and the
` - (7f
` 
`2b722
` 6
`2 b
`   6
`unredacted portion.
`) 7 b  
` -
`And with respect to the other two documents,
`+  
` 6 2b  6  6  b7i 2.
`the FDA minutes and the briefing book, as your Honor
` 6 $ i
` 7 2   6 f
`5
`
f4. 2 :7 ' 
`alluded to in the questioning of Mr. Parmelee and as is
`1 7 
` 6 n72
`
`
5 !- i   2
`2
`laid out
`in the e—mail correspondence we had with
` 
` 7
` 6  i
` b2  b  6 
` 6
`opposing counsel on this issue, we have provided full
` 2
`
b7 2  6
`2
`227.  63 3
` 57
`copies of all of the documents that Dr. Lublin actually
` b
`2 5  5 6 b7i 2 6 - (7f
` b 7:
`saw and relied on.
`He has not seen and relied on —— not
` 2   
`  - ' 62  2   
`  
`even seen at all the documents that the petitioners are
` 3 2   6 b7i 2 6 6 
`
` 2 
`seeking.
`So they —— those documents form no part of the
` 24
`
-  6: 62 b7i 2 5i   5 6
`basis of Novartis's patent owner response here and
`) f2
`2 5 3
`2m2     2 2 6  
`opposition. And this really is,
`in our view, an
`+ 2
`
` -  6
`2 :
`2.
` 7 3
`. 
`inappropriate use of either, frankly,
`the required or
`
` 
`  72 5 
` 6. 5 4:. 6 n7
` 
`additional discovery protocols in the rules.
`1 
`
`  
`2b3:  b2
` 6 72-
`It always happens that documents are used
`  :2 6 2 6 b7i 2  72
`that refer or often quote other documents.
`Sometimes
` 6 5  5  n7   6 b7i 2- i
`i2
`those quotes or referrals matter; sometimes they don't.
` 62 n7 2  52 i h 2i
`i2 6:  m -
`But the rules are pretty clear that you only have to
` &7 6 72   : b 6 :7  : 63 
`provide as required discovery the exhibits that are used
` 3
` 2 n7
` 
`2b3: 6 j6
`f
` 2 6  72
`to advance your position. And I don't think it's
`  3 b :7 2
`
` -    m 6
` 4
` m2
`disputed that we've done that.
`) 
`27  6 m3   6 -
`Those exhibits do quote from other
`+ 62 j6
`f
` 2  n7  5i  6
`documents. That is —— that is for sure.
`The quotes
` b7i 2- 6
`2 6
`2 5 27- 6 n7 2
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`
 +
`
`4
`And that's the purpose for which it is used
`+  6 m2 6 72 5 6
`b6
`
`2 72
`25
`in the brief. That's the purpose for which it is used
`
` 6 f
`5- 6 m2 6 72 5 6
`b6
`
`2 72
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`CALL WI TH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`from the other documents frankly are —— are not being
` 5i 6  6 b7i 2 5 4:    f
`

`used in the way that I think Mr. Parmelee is describing.
`) 72
` 6 : 6  6
` 4 !- i
`2 2b
`f
`
-
`Just to briefly touch on each of them.
`+ 972  f
`5: 7b6  b6 5 6i-
`
`
`
`4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2
`
`

`

`CALL WI TH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`in Dr. Lublin's declaration. You don't need the
`
` - (7f
` m2 b
` - ;7  m  6
`underlying minutes to understand that point. What you
`) 7 :
`
i
` 7 2  7 2   6 
` - 6 :7
`need is the letter that we've provided from Mr. Watson
`+ 
`2 6   6 m3 3
` 5i !-  2
`to —— to Mount Sinai.
`   !7
` 
`-
`
`
 
`
`
`
`Dr. Lublin was capable of describing
` - (7f
` 2 bf 5 2b
`f
`

`|_\
`all of that in his deposition if he had been asked based
`  5 6
` 6
`2 2
`
`
`5 6 6 f 24 f2
`N N
`on the documents that have been provided. And the
`  6 b7i 2 6 63 f 3
`-  6
`briefing book itself is not something that he relied on,
`) f
`5
`
f4
` 25
`2  2i 6
`
6 6 
`  .
`it's simply something quoted in a document that he
`+
` m2 2
`i: 2i 6
`
n7 
`  b7i 6 6
`relied on.
` 
`  -
`
`6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N
`
`1
`
`
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`
 1
`
`CALL WI TH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`I'm happy to talk about the additional
` mi 6:  4 f7 6 
`
` 
`discovery perspective if your Honor would like, but
`) 
`2b3: 2b
`3
`5 :7 '  7 
`4. f7
`since Mr. Parmelee limited his comments to required
`+ 2
` b !- i 
`i
`  6
`2 bii 2  n7
`
`discovery,
`I'm also happy to stop here right now and, if
` 
`2b3:. mi 2 6:  2  6 
`
6   .
`5
`your Honors have any questions, happy to talk about
`1 :7 ' 2 63  : n72
` 2. 6:  4 f7
`that.
` 6 -
`
`JUDGE POLLOCK:
`I think it would be best if
` 9 #((#%"8  6
` 4
` 7 f f2
`5
`you would talk about additional discovery as well,
` :7 7 4 f7 
`
`  
`2b3: 2 .
`please.
` 2-
`
`MR. TRENCHARD: Okay.
`I'm happy to talk
` !- %' 8 #4:- mi 6:  4
`about that.
` f7 6 -
`
`
`
`We do not think there is any basis for
`)    6
` 4 6
`2  : f2
`2 5
`allowing a motion for additional discovery with respect
`+ 
`
 i
` 5 
`
`  
`2b3: 
` 6 2b
`to any of the documents the petitioners have requested
`   : 5 6 b7i 2 6 
`
` 2 63 n72 
`and there are a few reasons for that.
`1   6   5 2 2 5 6 -
`The most
`important reason is, under the
` 6 i2
`i  2
`2. 7  6
`Garmin factors,
`the factor number one and the factor on
` i
` 5b 2. 6 5b  7if     6 5b  
`which requests like this typically founder is the
` 6
`b6 n72 2 
`4 6
`2 :
`b: 57 
`2 6
`requirements that there be some evidence or reasoning to
` n7
`i 2 6 6 f 2i 3
` b  2
`

`suggest that the requested additional information will
` 27
2 6 6 n72  
`
` 
` 5i
` 
`
`be favorable to the requestor's position. We —— as your
` f 53f  6 n72 m2 2
`
` -  2 :7
`Honors probably saw in the e—mail correspondence we
`) ' 2 ff: 2
` 6  i
` b2  b 
`submitted before this call, we have repeatedly asked the
`+ 27fi
`  f5 6
`2 b.  63  : 24 6
`petitioner for such reasoning or evidence, and so far as
` 
`
`  5 27b6 2
`
 3
` b.   2 5 2
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`Page
`
 
`
`CALL WITH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`we can tell, we are aware of none.
`On the contrary,
`to
`  b .    5  - # 6 b :. 
`the extent that these additional documents, especially
`) 6 j  6 62 
`
`  b7i 2. 2b
`:
`the briefing book and the FDA minutes are discussed
`+ 6 f
`5
`
f4   6 $ i
` 7 2  
`2b722
`(inaudible) of the evidence,
`they —— the evidence
` d
` 7
`fe 5 6 3
` b. 6: 6 3
` b
`suggests that they help Novartis's position and not the
`1 27
2 2 6 6: 6 3
`2m2 2
`
`    6
`petitioner's position.
`So we think that you can't even
` 
`
` m2 2
`
` -   6
` 4 6 :7 b m 3
`get past Garmin factor number one.
`
 2 i
` 5b  7if  -
`In our back—and—forth with counsel,
`they
`  7 fb4   5 6 
` 6 b7 2. 6:
`said quite candidly that what they really wanted was the
` 2
` n7
`  b 
`: 6 6 6: :   2 6
`documents in order to evaluate Novartis's position
` b7i 2
`   37  3
`2m2 2
`
`
`rather than to advocate for some position of theirs.
`  6 6  3b  5 2i 2
`
` 5 6
`2-
`That's the type of fishing expedition that the rules are
`) 6 m2 6 : 5 5
`26
`
j
`
` 6 6 72 
`designed to prevent.
`+ 2
`
  3 -
`In addition,
`the other factors we think of
`  
`
` . 6  6 5b 2  6
` 4 5
`Garmin are either not particularly relevant or weigh in
`1 i
`  
` 6  
`b7: 3  
`
6
`
`our favor including the timing of where we are. We
` 7 53
` b7
`
6
`i
`
5 6  - 
`didn't get a request for these documents until more than
` 
` m
  n72 5 62 b7i 2 7
` i 6
`three weeks had passed after we filed our patent owner's
` 6 42 6 22 5   5
` 7    m2
`responsibilities. Here we are and I think there's only
` 2 2
`f
`
`
`2- '      6
` 4 6m2  :
`about that amount of time, maybe a little bit more
` f7 6 i7 5
`i. i:f  
`  f
` i
`before the reply briefs are due. Briefing at resolving
` f5 6 : f
`52  7- &
`5
`
 23
`

`producing these documents in that time seems impractical
`) 7b
`
62 b7i 2
` 6
`i 2i2
`ib
`b
`to us.
`+  72-
`
`
`
`And lastly and quite importantly, especially
`  2 :   n7
` 
`i  :. 2b
`:
`
`TSG Reporting — Worldwide — 877—702—9580
`  
`

`   
`
`

`

`
 
`
`CALL WITH BOARD
` % (( ' &# 
`with respect to the briefing book and one of the other
` 
` 6 2b  6 f
`5
`
f4     5 6  6
`documents that have been mentioned at one point in
`) b7i 2 6 63 f i
`     
`
`
`e—mail correspondence we haven't discussed yet,
`there is
`+  i
` b2  b  63 m 
`2b722 : . 6
`2
`a nontrivial effort involved in identifying and
`   
`3
` 55
` 33
`
`
`5:
`
 
`producing the documents.
`The briefing book in
`1 7b
`
6 b7i 2- 6 f
`5
`
f4
`
`particular,
`so your Honor understands how this works,
` 
`b7. 2 :7 '  7 2  2 6 6
`2 42.
`these are living documents with inside of Novartis that
` 62  
`3
`
b7i 2 
` 6
` 2
` 5 3
`2 6
`they update. Lots of people have input into them, but
` 6: 7 - ( 2 5  63
` 7
`  6i. f7
`they're not formal FDA submissions.
`So they're not like
` 6:m  5i $ 27fi
`22
` 2-  6:m  
`4
`a new drug application or the formal submission that's
`   7

`b
`  6 5i 27fi
`22
` 6 m2
`in this exhibit that describes the futility protocol
`
` 6
`2 j6
`f
` 6 2b
`f2 6 57
`
` :  b
`here.
`) 6-
`
`
`
`These are informal documents that are shared
`+ 62 
` 5i b7i 2 6  26
`with FDA before our meeting. But what that means is
` 
` 6 $ f5 7 i
`
- &7 6 6 i 2
`2
`that identifying and reviewing and producing these
`1 6
`
`5:
`
  3
`
`
  7b
`
62
`documents within Novartis, especially here we are more
` b7i 2 
` 6
` 3
`2. 2b
`: 6   i
`than ten years later,
`is a significant undertaking.
` 6  :2  .
`2  2
`

`5
`b 7  4
`
-
`And —— and so the burden we think as well weighs
`    2 6 f7  6
` 4 2  
`
62
`against, at least with respect to that document,
`the
` 

` 2 .  2 
` 6 2b  6 b7i . 6
`petitioner's request.
` 
`
` m2 n72 -
`I think that's all I had to say about the
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket