throbber
Allergic rhinitis: The patient's perspective
`
`William Storms, MD," Eli 0. Meltzer, MO,b Robert A . Nathan, MD,• and
`John C. Selner, MD< Colorado Springs and Denver, Colo., and San Diego, Calif.
`
`A elf-administered screening questionnaire was scot to
`15,000 househo lds randomly elected from a nationwide
`panel of approximately 200,000 households. This question(cid:173)
`naire was used to select a balanced sa mple of 1450 persons
`with 2:7 days of nasal/ocular symptoms in the previous 12
`months. These persons received a second questionnaire that
`contained detailed questions regarding symptoms, triggers,
`patient attitudes, and medical treatment. or the 1065 people
`who responded to the second questionnaire, 481 were identi(cid:173)
`fied as having self-reported seasonal or perennial allergic
`rhinitis. Our major findings regarding the attitudes toward
`their disease expressed by these 481 respondents ore as fol(cid:173)
`lows. Although 53% or our study population regarded their
`symptoms as mild, 47% reported onset before age 17, sug(cid:173)
`gesting that many have become accustomed to their symp(cid:173)
`toms. The level of allergen avoidance was generally low; only
`38% took any allergen avoidance measures in the home. The
`level of self-medication was high; 92% reported self-medica(cid:173)
`tion with prescription and nonprescription drugs. Finally,
`26% believed that their symptoms were "well controlled" or
`"completely controlled," and 52% believed that effective treat(cid:173)
`ments were available. Our llndings suggest the need for a
`greater eft'ort on the part of health care providers to identify
`patients with allergic rh initis and to educate them about
`their disease. (J Allergy Clio lmmunol 1997;99:5825-8.)
`
`Key words: Allergic rhinitis, nasal symptoms, environmemal
`triggers, self-medication, nationwide survey
`
`The most common allergic condition, allergic rhinitis,
`presents several diagnostic challenges. Standardized di(cid:173)
`agnostic criteria are not available. The ymptoms (itch(cid:173)
`ing, sneezing, nasal discharge, or blockage) may prompt
`physicians and patients alike to think first of a viral cause
`(i.e., the common cold) and not an allergic reaction .
`Many patients have coexisting allergic and oonallergic
`factors that trigger their rhinitis. A careful history is
`critical, but who bas not had na al symptoms at some
`time? Patients with mild symptoms may not attribute
`tbem to allergies. lndeed, it ha been sugge ted that
`there is no clear boundary marking onset of the allergic
`response; rather, there may be a continuum, with pa(cid:173)
`tients experiencing occa ional symptoms of rhioiti at
`one end and, on the other, patients with evere, chronic
`disease. 1 Therefore, what a patient ays may not fully
`reflect the clinical reality.
`Management of this disorder is also less straightfor-
`
`From •Asthma and Allergy Associates, Colorado Springs; bthe Allergy
`and Aslhma Medical Group and Re earch Center, San Diego; and
`•the Allergy Respiratory Institute of Colorado, Denver.
`Reprint req uests: William Storms, MD, 2709 North Tejon Street.
`Colorado Springs, CO 80907.
`Copyright C 1997 by Mosby-Year Book, lnc.
`0091-6749/97 $5.00 + 0
`l/0/81434
`
`ward than it may appea r at the outset. First, there i the
`i ue of defining clinically relevant outcomes. Functional
`·tatu and weU-being arc increasingly recognized a
`important outcomes.2 A related issue concern the point
`at which the primary care physician should refer the
`patient for evaluation by a specialist. It is important for
`doctor and patient to arrive at an understanding of
`treatment expectation .
`This article is intended to help clinician address these
`diagnostic and management issues. It reports on a
`community-based, nationwide sample of people with
`self-reported allergic rhinitis with 7 days or more of
`symptoms in the previous 12 months. These patients
`were surveyed with regard to their perceptions of their
`yrnptoms their perceptions of the safety and effective(cid:173)
`ness of treatment, and how these perceptions affect their
`deci ion to eek medical advice.
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`Sample
`
`Target household were elected from a nationwide panel of
`approximately 200,()()() households maintained by a market
`ational Family Opinion Inc. of Toledo, Ohio.
`research firm,
`Details regarding recruitment and updating of this database
`have been published elsewhere.~
`
`Survey
`In 1993, a elf-ad mini tered screening questionnaire was sent
`to 15,000 randomly selected household from the nationwide
`pane~ with the request that it be an wered by the hou ehold
`member who knew the most about the family' health tatus and
`history in the previous 12 month . A total of 9946 hou e holds
`(66.3% ) responded; 5273 of these households contained a total
`of 8394 persons with nasal/ocular sympto m (sneezing runny
`nose, stuffy nose or head, itchy eyes, or watery eyes). A bal(cid:173)
`anced sample of 1450 persons with 7 or more days (singly or
`con ecutively) of these symptom within the previous year were
`selected to receive a questionnaire containing detailed ques(cid:173)
`tions regarding symptom , triggers, patient attitudes, and med(cid:173)
`ical treatmenL A Iota! of 1065 people (73.4%) responded to this
`second que tionnaire. Among the questions asked was, "Which
`of the following best describe
`the group of symptoms you
`indicated?" Options provided were ( I) a common cold; (2) a
`easonal allergy (i .e., hay fever) ; (3) an allergy I have all the
`time; ( 4) an allergy only when expo cd to triggers (i.e., du t,
`p llution); (5) sinus problems; and (6) other (plea e . pecify).
`Subjects who answered items (2) or (3) were assumed to have
`seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis, re pectively, and were
`included in our analysis.
`The detailed survey included a series of que tions designed to
`evaluate how allergic rhinitis sufferers perceive their symptoms
`and their expectations regarding medical care. Respondents
`were questioned about their level of satisfaction with -ymptom
`control and current reasons for seeking or not seeking medical
`
`S825
`
`PLAINTIFFS'
`TRIAL EXHIBIT
`
`PTX0042
`
`MEDA APTX03502663
`
`PTX0042-00001
`
`CIP2170
`Argentum Pharmaceuticals v. Cipla Ltd.
`IPR2017-00807
`
`1
`
`

`

`SS26 Storms et al.
`
`J ALLERGY CUN IMMUNOL
`JUNE 1997
`
`TABLE I. Demographic characteristics of study
`population
`
`Characteristic
`
`Total
`Gender
`Male
`Female
`Age (yr)
`< 18
`18-34
`35-49
`50-64
`~65
`Region
`ortheast
`New England
`Middle Atlantic
`Midwest
`Ea t North cntral
`West orth Central
`South
`South Atlantic
`East South Central
`West South Central
`West
`Mountain
`Pacific
`Population density
`Rural
`< 100,000
`Urban
`100,000-499,999
`500,000-1 ,999,999
`~ 2 ,000,000
`Hou ehold income ($)
`< 12,500
`12,500-24,999
`25,000-39.999
`40,000-59,999
`~60,000
`
`Number (o/o)
`
`481 (100.0)
`
`206 (42.8)
`271 (56.3)
`
`57 (J i.9)
`99 (20.6)
`161 (33.5)
`92(19.1)
`52 (10.8)
`
`25 (5.2)
`77 ( 16.0)
`
`69 ( 14.3)
`36 (7.5)
`
`81 (16.8)
`23 (4.8)
`56 (l1.6)
`
`39 (8. t)
`75 (15.6}
`
`108 (22.5)
`
`73 (15.2)
`102 (21.2)
`J98 (41.2)
`
`43 (8.9)
`89 (18.5)
`109 (22.7)
`126 (26.2)
`114 (23.7)
`
`help. They were also asked to indicate whether during the past
`12 months their symptoms were "completely controlled," "well
`controlled," "somewhat controlled,'' " poorly controlled," or
`" not controlled." They also reported factOrs that affected their
`symptoms, including potential allergens. time of day, and
`cason. In addition, they were asked to indicate their level of
`agreement with a number of statements concerning symptoms.
`such as " My symptoms arc mild."
`Perceptions of physician interactions were indicated by re(cid:173)
`sponden ts' behavior in seeking treatment from a physician,
`including estimation of the length of time that elapsed after
`symptom onset before they consulted a physician. U e of
`self-medication (nonprescription, pre cription, or both) before
`consultation with a physician was also probed.
`
`RESULTS
`Population demographics
`A total of 481 subjects were included in the final analysis.
`Most of the respondents were white (93%), and there
`were slightly more fema les than males (56% ver us
`
`TABLE il. Response to survey question, "Which
`of the following best describes your behavior in
`seeking treatment from a doctor for your rhinitic
`symptoms?"
`
`Responses of 481 persons with
`self-reported allergic rhinitis
`
`I see a doctor about my symptom
`a soon a
`they begin
`I di cuss my symptoms with my
`doctor only when 1 am seeing
`him for another reason
`My symptoms have to be everc
`enough to limit normal daily
`activiric before I seek treat(cid:173)
`ment from a doctor
`
`Number
`(%)
`
`240 (49.9)
`
`7 (18.1)
`
`77 (16.0)
`
`77 (16.0)
`
`43%). The study population represented all geographic
`regions of the mainland United States with an equal
`distribution among rural and urban areas. Full details of
`the population demographic are given in Table I.
`
`Perception of symptoms
`Onset. The age at which patients first started experi(cid:173)
`encing nasaVocular symptoms was :::3 years in 9% of
`patients, between 4 and 10 years in 20%, between ll and
`17 year in 18%, and between 18 and 34 years in 31 %.
`After age 34, the likelihood of symptom onset dimin(cid:173)
`ished; only 13% reported ymptom onset after age 34.
`The age at symptom on et was
`imilar in males and in
`females.
`Patients were more likely to experience symptom in
`the pring and fail; 64% and 54% , respectively reported
`that their ymptoms were most evcre at these time . In
`contrast, on ly lO% and 25 % reported that their symp(cid:173)
`toms were wor t in winter or ·ummer. A circadian
`pattern wa ' also evident, with 42% reporting that their
`symptom were worst immcdjately after awakening and
`10% reporting that their symptoms were wor t during
`tudy group re(cid:173)
`the nighL Thirty-two percent of ur
`ported that their symptoms were wor ened only by
`expo ure to environmental triggers such a.~ pollen or air
`pollution.
`Description of symptoms. Subjects were asked to indi(cid:173)
`cate their level of agreement with statement about their
`symptoms. To the statement " My symptom are an
`inconvenience," 87% agreed. To the statement "My
`symptoms are mild, ' 53% agreed. To the tatement " l
`have learned to live with my symptoms," 80% agreed.
`
`Perception of physician interaction
`Extefll of physician consultation. Sixty-three percent of
`subjects had consu.lted a phy ician about their symptoms
`during the previous 12 month . Unless symptoms be(cid:173)
`came severe enough to limit daily activitic , study sub(cid:173)
`jects tended to discus
`their rhinitis during a visit that
`\Vas scheduled for some other rea on (Table II). Tho e
`
`MEDA APTX03502664
`
`PTX0042-00002
`
`2
`
`

`

`J ALLERGY CUN IMMUNOL
`VOLUME 99, NUMBER 6, PART 2
`
`Storms et al. S827
`
`60
`
`50
`
`- 40
`en - 30
`
`~ 0 .........
`c
`<l>
`-.;::
`ctl a.
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`Strongly/
`somewh at
`agree
`
`Neither
`agree
`nor disagree
`
`Strongly/
`somewhat
`disagree
`
`FIG. 1. Survey of 481 people with self-reported al lergic rhinitis. Responses to the statement "I don't believe
`treatment is avai lable that wil l help my rhinitic symptoms."
`
`who did consult a physician during lhe previou 12
`months waited a mean of 7.85 days after onset of their
`symptoms before doing so.
`Type oj' physician consulted. Fifty-six percent of
`subjects reported that a general or family practitioner
`first diagnosed their symptoms. Fifty-nine percent
`reported that a general or family practitioner was the
`type of physician seen most often for their symptoms.
`Although the initiaJ diagnosis was made by an allergist
`in only 17% of subjects, 52% reported that they bad at
`some time seen an allergist for their symptoms. When
`asked to specify reasons for seeing a specialist, 55%
`reported referral by another physician, 28% reported
`seeking specialist treatment on their own initiative,
`and J 1% were referred by a friend or family member.
`
`Perception of treatment
`
`Degree of satisfaclion. Of those subjects who had
`consulted a physician, 92% reported se lf-medicating
`before their visit; 46% bad tried only nonprescription
`medications, 17% bad tried on ly prescription medica(cid:173)
`tions, and 29% had tried both. Of the total study
`population, 26% believed that their symptoms were
`completely or well controlled during the past 12
`months, 52% reported that their symptoms were
`somewhat controlled, and 22% reported that their
`symptoms were poorly controlled or not controlled
`(Table HI). When a ked to indicate level of agree(cid:173)
`ment with the tatement " I don' t believe treatment is
`avai lable tha t will help my symptoms," 18% agreed
`(Fig. I), Of subjects who had stopped seeing a doctor
`
`TABLE Ill. Perceptions of symptom contro l and
`side effects in 481 persons w ith self-reported
`allergic rhinitis
`
`Degree of symptom control
`Complete or well controlled
`Somewha t controlled
`Poorly or not controlled
`
`from drug taken for ~-ymptoms
`Side effect
`Experiences symptoms
`Avoids some drug because of side effects
`Worrie · about side effects
`
`Number
`(%)
`
`125 (26.0)
`250 (52.0)
`106 (22.0)
`
`149 (31.0)
`313 (65.1)
`231 (48.0)
`
`for their symptom , 19% did o because they believed
`effective treatments were not available and 44% be(cid:173)
`cause they had found effective treatment.
`Side effects. When asked to ind icate level of agree(cid:173)
`ment with the statement -y experience ide effects from
`the medications I take for my symptom ,'' 31% agreed.
`Sixty-five percent agreed with the statement "Becau e of
`the ide effects, there are some drugs I would not take
`for my symptom ." Forty-eight percent agreed with the
`statement "I worry about side effects from the drugs I
`take for my symptoms."
`Compliance. The level of compliance reported by this
`population was high. When asked whether they took
`more medication than their physician recommended,
`
`MEDA APTX03502665
`
`PTX0042-00003
`
`3
`
`

`

`S828 Storms et al.
`
`J ALLERGY CUN IMMUNOL
`JUNE 1997
`
`TABLE IV. Responses to survey question "Which
`of the following do you do to help control your
`symptoms? (Check all that apply)"
`
`Responses of 481 persons with self-reported
`allergic rhinitis
`
`Number
`(%)
`
`Avoid smoke-filled places (bars, restaurantS)
`Vacuum my hou e frequently
`Dust my house frequently
`Don't have pets inside my house
`Avoid outdoor activities
`Avoid wearing perfume
`Wash bedding in hot water
`Wrap mattresses in plastic cover
`Do not have carpeting (or rugs) in my bedroom
`Medication/see doctor
`Keep only fumiturc and necessities in my
`bedroom
`Air filter/cleaner
`Do not have carpeting (or rugs) in my house
`Treat carpets or furniture with acaricides or
`tannic acid
`Humidifier/vaporizer
`Wear dust/face mask
`AJI others
`one of the above
`
`219 (45.5)
`184 (38.3)
`164 (34.1)
`100 (20.8)
`90 (18.7)
`83 (17.3)
`72 (15.0)
`29 (6.0)
`20 (4.2)
`18 (3.7)
`14 (2.9)
`
`14 (2.9)
`10 (2.1)
`7 (1.5)
`
`2 (0.4)
`I (0.2)
`17 (3.5)
`122 (25.4)
`
`92% answered seldom or never. When asked whether
`they took less, 68% answered eldom or never.
`Nonpharmacologic meast1res. The most common al(cid:173)
`lergen avoidance measures were du ting and vacuuming
`in the home and avoiding smoke-filled locations uch a
`bars and restaurants (Table IV).
`
`DISCUSSION
`The portrait that emerges from this tudy i one of a
`somewhat stoic population of patients who consider
`consulting a physician only after they have been
`significantly troubled or inconvenienced by their con (cid:173)
`dition.
`Further. patients may not report their symptoms fulJy
`to a physician. Often, the subject of their rhiniti.
`is
`brought up only in passing, in the course of a visit for
`some other reason-hardly an optimal context for the
`physician to make an accurate diagno ·is or develop a
`management plan. The physician may also underesti(cid:173)
`mate the severity of disease because patient , when
`a ked about their symptoms, are likely to describe them
`as mild; 53% of the study population responded in this
`fashion. Yet the reality may be otherwi e. Data. uggest
`that allergic rhinitis can result in a measurable decline in
`general health status.•· 5 Patient may not be awar of
`this decline because they have been living with their
`condition their entire adult life (47% reported on et of
`allergic rhiniti before 17 years of age) and have become
`accustomed to their state of health. Often it i only
`when they notice an improvement after receiving treat-
`
`taru was
`ment that they realize their previous health
`lead us to su -
`less than optimal. These consideration
`pect that allergic rhiniti may be underdiagnosed.
`Allergen avoidance particularly
`in
`the bedroom
`(where patients may spend 8 hours or more daily), i an
`important step in management. Yet in our study popu(cid:173)
`lation there were few measures taken against dust mites,
`such as mattress encasement hot water wash of bedding,
`acaricide treatment of carpets, and removal of carpeting
`from the bedroom. This finding suggests a need for more
`patient education regarding effective allergen avoidance
`measures.
`is also
`it
`When selecting a management strategy
`important to keep in mind that mo t patient have had
`prior experience with medication that resulted in either
`an inadequate therapeutic response or adverse etrects.
`In our study, there was a high level of self-medication
`(92%) i.nvolving prescription and nonprescription drugs,
`without much hope of ·uccess: only 52% believed eJfec(cid:173)
`tivc treatments were avai lable; 31 % had experienced
`side effects; 48% were concerned about adverse effects.
`Dosing regimens should take into account our finding
`that symptoms are worse in the morning than in the
`evening.
`For patients who remain unre ponsive to apparently
`optimal pharmacologic therapy, referral should be con(cid:173)
`sidered. An allergist can help identify allergic triggers.
`This is particularly important when better environmental
`control measures are being considered; such measures
`can be implemented only after important allergens have
`been identified through a detailed history and skin
`testing. The allergist can also, if indicated, institute
`specific immunotherapy.
`In conclusion, there i · a need to educate patien
`about allergic rhinitis, its ymptoms, and the problem.
`they may cause. The health care provider shou ld listen
`carefully and be aware of what is left unsaid as well as
`what i actually . aid . Such attentiveness may take addi(cid:173)
`tional time, but our study suggests that it would be time
`well spent.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`3.
`
`1. Inte rnational Rhin i t~ Manageme nt Working Group. lnt~rnation:ll
`consensu
`report on the diagnosis ~nd mannge mem of rhinitis.
`Allergy l994;49(suppl): 1-34.
`2. Stew-Mt AL, Greenfie ld S. Hays RD. ct 31. Functional status and
`we ll·t>eing of patients with chronic condition : results from the
`Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA t989;2o2:907-13.
`tewart WF, Lipton RB. Celentano DD. Reed ML Prevalence of
`migraine headache in the United State : relation to age. income. race,
`and other sociodemographic factors. JAMA 1992;267:64-9.
`4. Bou quet J, Bullinger M. Fayol C, Marquis P, Valentin B. Burt in B.
`Assessm~nt of qu ality of life in patknts with perenni al allergic rhinitis
`wilh the French version of the SF-36 Health St atus Queslionnaire.
`J Allergy Clin lmmunol 1994;94:182·8.
`5. Melt1.er EO. Nalhan R. Selner JC, Storms W. Qunlity of life and
`rltinitic symptoms: results of a nationwide survey with the SF-36 and
`RQLQ queslionnaircs. J Allergy Clin lmmunol l997:99:S815-9.
`
`M EDA_APTX03502666
`
`PTX0042-00004
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket