`
`EDITORIAL
`
`Anti-inflammatory actions of new antihistamines
`
`Histamine has been recognized as a major mediator pro-
`ducing allergic reactions and diseases [1]. Antihistamines
`are widely used for treatment of these conditions. First-
`generation antihistamines (traditional antihistamines) includ-
`ing hydroxyzine, chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine
`display poor selectivity for H1-receptors. They are effective
`in reducing histamine-related symptoms, but the use of them
`have been limited by sedation and troublesome gastro-
`intestinal symptoms due to their penetration of the blood–
`brain barrier and anticholinergic effects,
`respectively.
`Second-generation antihistamines (new antihistamines),
`including terfenadine, feofenadine, cetirizine, ketotifen,
`azelastine and ebastine, which display greater selectivity
`for H1-receptors and lack of penetration of the blood–brain
`barrier, have been developed to reduce these side-effects
`[2–6]. Although second-generation antihistamines display
`antagonistic actions on H1-receptors, several studies have
`demonstrated that
`the ability of new antihistamines to
`attenuate the production of inflammatory reactions, which
`appear to unrelated to their ability to antagonize the effects
`of histamine at H1-receptor sites [2–6]. Thus, new antihista-
`mines can modulate various inflammatory reactions besides
`their H1-receptor antagonism.
`The pathogenesis of allergic inflammation is complex and
`involves multiple inflammatory cells, cytokines and media-
`tors. The clinical efficacy of oral and topical new antihista-
`mines in allergic diseases and their anti-inflammatory
`actions have been investigated. A number of studies demon-
`strate that new antihistamines reduce clinical symptoms of
`allergic diseases. Several studies support the view that new
`antihistamines have anti-inflammatory effects in vivo [5–15].
`For instance, new antihistamines such as cetirizine and
`azelastine attenuate eosinophil recruitment into the site of
`allergic inflammation [8,14], and intracellular adhesion
`molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression on epithelial cells from
`the site of allergic inflammation [11,12,14]. Extensive
`studies have been conducted to clarify the mechanism in
`anti-inflammatory actions of new antihistamines;
`these
`actions are outlined as follows:
`X Downregulation:
`Mediator release
`ICAM-1 expression
`Superoxide generation
`Chemotaxis
`Cytokine expression
`X Upregulation:
`Number and function of b2-adrenoceptor
`New antihistamines can attenuate mediator release. For
`
`instance, new antihistamines inhibit histamine release from
`IgE-sensitized basophils [16,17]. In addition, it has also
`been reported that new antihistamines inhibit the synthesis
`and release of arachinoid acid metabolites including leuko-
`triene C4 from mast cells and basophils [16,18]. Interest-
`ingly, new antihistamines inhibit chemical mediator release
`from cells stimulated with not only IgE but also nonimmuno-
`genic agents including calcium ionophore, indicating that
`antihistamines can block IgE receptor-mediated signal
`pathway as well as other intracellular signal transduction
`pathway(s) [2]. New antihistamines attenuate the recruit-
`ment of eosinophils into the sites of allergic inflammation
`via the inhibition of ICAM-1 expression. For instance,
`cetirizine inhibits eosinophil recruitment into the airway
`of allergic bronchial asthmatics challenged with corre-
`sponding allergen [19]. Similarly, cetirizine inhibits
`eosinophil recruitment into the skin induced by platelet-
`activating factor (PAF) [20]. Analysis of the mechanism in
`cetirizine-dependent attenuation of eosinophil recruitment
`into the sites of allergic inflammation has revealed that
`cetirizine selectively inhibits eosinophil adhesion to human
`umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) but not neutro-
`phils [21]. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that new
`antihistamines such as ketotifen and azelastine inhibit
`ICAM-1
`expression
`on
`tumour
`necrosis
`factor-a
`(TNFa)
`-stimulated HUVEC [22] and nasal epithelial
`cells from the patients with allergic rhinitis challenged
`with corresponding allergen [14,23],
`resulting in the
`attenuation of eosinophil recruitment
`into the sites of
`allergic inflammation. New antihistamines can modulate
`eosinophil functions. Several studies have demonstrated
`that new antihistamines inhibit survival, chemotaxis, gen-
`eration of superoxide and degradation of eosinophils [24–
`28]. Neutrophils are well known to generate superoxide
`anions which cause the tissue damage. Although cetirizine
`dose not inhibit neutrophil recruitment, this drug reduces the
`generation of superoxide anions from neutrophils [29].
`A variety of cells, including lymphocytes, participate in
`the production of allergic inflammation by expressing var-
`ious cytokines. The inhibition of cytokine production which
`promotes allergic inflammation is an important strategy
`controlling allergic inflammation. New antihistamines
`such as azelastine, terfenadine and ketotifen inhibit inter-
`leukin (IL) -2, IL-3, IL-4 and IL-5 production by mitogen-
`stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes [30], indicating
`that these drugs could attenuate the production of allergic
`inflammation by inhibiting the production of TH2-type
`T-lymphocyte-derived cytokines.
`In addition, cetirizine
`
`q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd
`
`1593
`
`CIP2157
`Argentum Pharmaceuticals v. Cipla Ltd.
`IPR2017-00807
`
`1
`
`
`
`1594
`
`S. Hayashi and S. Hashimoto
`
`inhibits monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and
`RANTES production by interferon-stimulated keratinocytes
`[31]. Interestingly, glucocorticosteroids inhibit the produc-
`tion of IL-8 but not monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1)
`and RANTES, indicating that distinct mechanism is involved
`in the regulation of MCP-1 and RANTES production [31].
`Airway epithelial cells are well known to express various
`cytokines which are possibly involved in the production of
`allergic inflammation of the asthmatic airway. In this issue
`of Clinical and Experimental Allergy, Arnold et al. have
`examined the role of cetirizine on IL-8 release from human
`alveolar type U epithelial cell lines, A549 [32]. This study
`demonstrated that cetirizine attenuated IL-8 release by
`TNFa and PMA-stimulated A549, but not by IL-1-b and
`respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-stimulated A549, indi-
`cating that an inhibition of cetirizine on IL-8 release is
`stimulus-dependent. The promoter of the gene contains
`sequences for binding several nuclear transcription factors.
`Transcriptional factors participate to various extents in the
`inducible expression of the genes. Arnold et al. analysed the
`mechanism in the inhibitory effect of cetirizine on IL-8
`release by airway epithelial cells. The results indicated that
`the attenuation of IL-8 release by cetirizine resulted from
`downregulation of accessible DNA-binding sites of the
`nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB). H1-receptor antagonist,
`azelastine, has been shown to inhibit IL-1, IL-6, TNFa and
`granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor mRNA
`expression and DNA-binding activity of NF-kB [33]. NF-kB
`participates to various extent in the inducible expression of
`the genes encoding these cytokines. Thus, the inhibition by
`cetirizine and azelastine of cytokine expression might be
`mediated by the inhibition of DNA-binding activity of
`NF-kB. These studies indicate that NF-kB is a molecular
`target of anti-inflammatory actions of new antihistamines.
`However, a precise mechanism remains to be determined.
`b2-adrenergic bronchodilator is widely used to treat
`bronchial asthma. b2-adrenoceptor desensitization may
`occur during long-term treatment of bronchial asthmatics
`the efficacy
`with b2-adrenergic agonists and may limit
`of b2-adrenergic agonists. New antihistamines have favour-
`ite activities which are increasing the density of b2-
`adrenoceptors and preventing downregulation of the number
`of b2-adrenoceptors. The density of b2-adrenoceptor on
`circulating lymphocytes has been regarded as a model
`frequently used to study b2-adrenoceptor function in man.
`Ketotifen increases b2-adrenoceptor density on lympho-
`cytes from bronchial asthmatics who have been treated
`with b2-adrenergic bronchodilator. The increases in density
`and the improvement of functions of b2-adrenoceptors were
`accompanied by a significant increase in peak expiratory
`flow rate in response to inhaled b2-adrenergic bronchodilator,
`salbutamol [34]. In addition, the number of b2-adrenoceptors
`was higher in azelastine and terbutaline-treated guinea pig
`
`lung than that in terbutaline only, showing that azelastine
`may prevent b-adrenergic agonist-induced downregulation
`of the number of b-adrenoceptors [35].
`There are several possible mechanisms by which new
`antihistamines regulate inflammatory reactions: (1) preven-
`tion of an increase in intracellular calcium and interference
`with calcium utilization, (2) modulation of intracellular
`cAMP levels, (3) inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC)
`activity, (4) inhibition of G-protein function, and (5) inhibi-
`tion of NF-kB binding (Fig. 1). An elevation of intracellular
`calcium levels plays an important step in the activation of
`various intracellular signals such as calcium–calmodulin
`cascades and PKC. Catalytic activation of calcium-
`dependent enzymes which can act as intracellular signals
`elicit a variety of cell functions. New antihistamines can
`modulate intracellular calcium-dependent signal transduc-
`tion pathways at several different mechanisms. Ketotifen
`decreases intracellular calcium levels by preventing calcium
`influx [36]. The inhibition of the binding of calcium to
`calcium channels may account for the prevention of calcium
`influx. Azelastine inhibits superoxide generation by neutro-
`phils in response to phorbol myristyl acetate and formyl-
`methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine and decreases inositol tri-
`phosphate, intracellular free calcium, and PKC activity [37].
`Azelastine can affect calcium–calmodulin pathways. Aze-
`lastine interacts with calmodulin resulting in the inhibition
`of calcium-calmodulin-dependent enzyme, phosphodiester-
`ase [38]. Cetirizine which has ionization and lipophilicity
`behaviour can directly dissolve into the cell membrane and
`stabilize the cell membrane [39], whose pharmacological
`properties may relate to the inhibition of release of calcium
`from intracellular stores. Intracellular cAMP can modulate
`various cell
`functions. Terfenadine,
`inhibits antigen-
`induced histamine release from sensitized guinea pig lung
`and rat peritoneal mast cells [40], and ketotifen also inhibits
`antigen-induced histamine release from human sensitized
`basophils [17], correlating with an increase in intracellular
`cAMP levels which prevents intracellular calcium mobili-
`zation. Azelastine inhibits histamine and TNFa release,
`
`Calcium influx
`Calcium channel
`
`G-protein
`
`Intracellular calcium
`Calcium mobilization
`
`Intracellular cAMP
`
`Protein kinase C
`
`Interacellular calcium store
`Calcium–calmodulin pathway
`
`NF-kB
`
`Cytokine expression
`
`Fig. 1. Intracellular mechanism in anti-inflammatory effects of
`new antihistamines
`
`q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 29, 1593–1596
`
`2
`
`
`
`possibly mediating through the inhibition of PKC activity
`[41,42]. Finally, Ko¨ller and colleagues, and Rihoux and
`colleagues have reported that the inhibition by cetirizine
`of mediator release may result from downregulation of
`G-protein activity [43,44]. Consequently, they have pro-
`posed that G-protein might be a molecular target for anti-
`inflammatory actions of cetirizine. They indicate new
`insight into the mechanism in anti-inflammatory actions of
`new antihistamines. There are a variety type of G-proteins
`which individually regulate intracellular signals and cell
`functions; therefore, the identification of G-protein whose
`functions are modulated by cetirizine and the downstream
`signals of G-protein which regulate mediator release remain
`to be determined.
`Quite recently, Tamaoki et al. have shown that azelastine
`inhibits PAF-induced microvascular leakage in airways,
`possibly involving inhibition of the release of neutrophil
`elastase from activated neutrophils [45]. Their results may
`indicate new pharmacological actions of azelastine.
`In summary, histamines play an important role in the
`production of allergic reactions. New antihistamines repre-
`sent the first line of treatment of these conditions, especially
`in nose, conjunctiva and skin. These drugs can modulate
`various inflammatory reactions besides their H1-receptor
`antagonism. The mechanisms in anti-inflammatory actions
`of new antihistamines have been extensively investigated;
`however, further studies focusing on analysis of intracellu-
`lar mechanism in anti-inflammatory effects are needed to
`clarify the anti-inflammatory actions.
`
`References
`
`1 Bachert C. Histamine — a major role in allergy? Clin Exp
`Allergy, 1998; 28 (Suppl. 6):15–9.
`2 Rimmer SJ, Church MK. The pharmacology and mechanisms
`of action of histamine H1-antagonists. Clin Exp Allergy 1990;
`20 (Suppl. 2):3–17.
`3 Simons FER. The antiallergic effects of antihistamines (H1-
`receptor antagonists). J Allergy Clin Immmunol 1992; 90:
`705–15.
`4 Busse WW. Role of antihistamines in allergic disease. Ann
`Allergy 1994; 72:371–5.
`5 Simons FER, Simons KJ. The pharmacology and use of H1-
`receptor- antagonist drugs. New Engl J Med 1994; 330:1663–
`70.
`6 Du Buske LM. Clinical comparison of histamine H1-receptor
`antagonist drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996; 98:S307–18.
`7 Sheffer AL. Cetirizine: antiallergic therapy beyond traditional
`H1 antihistamines. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 86:1040–
`6.
`8 Re´dier H, Chanez P, De Vos C et al. Inhibitory effect of
`cetirizine on the bronchial eosinophil recruitment induced by
`allergen inhalation challenge in allergic patients with asthma. J
`Allergy Clin Immunol 1992; 37:215–24.
`
`Anti-inflammatory actions of new antihistamines
`
`1595
`
`9 Walsh GM. News and commentary. Clin Exp Allergy 1994;
`24:81–5.
`10 Jinquan T, Reimert CM, Deleuran B, Zacharise C, Simons C,
`Thestrup-Pederson K. Cetirizine inhibits the in vivo and ex
`vivo chemotactic response of T lymphocytes and monocytes. J
`Allergy Clin Immunol 1995; 95:99–86.
`11 Bagnasco B, Canocia CW. Influence of H1-receptor antago-
`nists on adhesion molecules and cellular traffic. Allergy 1995;
`50:17–23.
`12 Fance L, Ciprandi G, Pronzato C et al. Cetirizine reduces
`ICAM-1 on epithelial cells during nasal minimal persistent
`inflammation in asymptomatic children with mite-allergic
`asthma. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1996; 109:272–6.
`13 Gupta SK. Effect of cetirizine and prednisolone on cellular
`infiltration and cytokine mRNA expression during allergen-
`induced late cutaneous responses. Clin Exp Allergy 1996;
`26:68–78.
`14 Ciprandi G, Ricca V, Passalacqua G et al. Seasonal rhinitis and
`azelastine:
`long- or short-term treatment. J Allergy Clin
`Immunol 1997; 99:301–7.
`15 Bousquet J. Antihistamines in severe/chronic rhinitis. Clin Exp
`Allergy 1998; 28 (Suppl. 6):49–53.
`16 Nabe M, Agrawal DK, Sarmiento EU, Townley RG. Inhibitory
`effect of terfenadine on mediator release from human blood
`basophils and eosinophils. Clin Exp Allergy 1989; 19:515–20.
`17 Castillo JG, Sanz ML, Oehling A. Action of ketotifen on
`histamine release and intracellular cAMP levels in basophil
`cultures from pollinic subjects. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)
`1986; 14:107–13.
`18 Nabe M, Miyagawa H, Agrawal DK, Sugiyama H, Townley
`RG. The effect of ketotifen on eosinophils as measured at
`LTC4 release and by chemotaxis. Allergy Proc 1991; 12:267–
`71.
`19 Re´dier H, Chanez P, De Vos C et al. Inhibitory effect of
`cetirizine on the bronchial eosinophil recruitment induced by
`allergen inhalation challenge in allergic patients with asthma. J
`Allergy Clin Immunol 1992; 90:215–24.
`20 Fadel R, David B, Herpin-Richard N, Borgnon A, Rassemont
`R, Rihoux JP. In vivo effects of cetirizine on cutaneous
`reactivity and eosinophil migration induced by platelet-activat-
`ing factor (PAF-acether) in man. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;
`86:314–20.
`21 Kyan-Aung U, Hallsworth M, Haskard D, De Vos C, Lee TH.
`The effects of cetirizine on the adhesion of human eosinophils
`and neutrophils to cultured human umbilical vein endothelial
`cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992; 90:270–2.
`22 Miki I, Kusano A, Ohta S et al. Histamine enhanced the TNF-
`alpha-induced expression of E-selectin and ICAM-1 on vas-
`cular endothelial cells. Cell Immunol 1996; 171:285–8.
`23 Ciprandi G, Pronzato C, Passalacqua G et al. Topical azelastine
`reduces eosinophil activation and intercellular adhesion
`molecule-1 expression on nasal epithelial cells: an antiallergic
`activity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996; 98:1088–96.
`24 Sedgwick JB, Busse WW. Inhibitory effect of cetirizine on
`cytokine-enhanced in vitro eosinophil survival. Ann Allergy
`Asthma Immunol 1997; 78:581–5.
`25 Okada C, Eda R, Miyagawa H et al. Effect of cetirizine on
`
`q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 29, 1593–1596
`
`3
`
`
`
`1596
`
`S. Hayashi and S. Hashimoto
`
`human eosinophil superoxide generation, eosinophil chemo-
`taxis and eosinophil peroxidase in vitro. Int Arch Allergy
`Immunol 1994; 103:384–90.
`26 Eda R, Townley RG, Hopp RJ. Effect of terfenadine on human
`eosinophil and neutrophil chemotactic response and generation
`of superoxide. Ann Allergy 1994; 73:154–60.
`27 Busse W, Randlev B, Sedgwick J. The effect of azelastine on
`neutrophil and eosinophil generation of superoxide. J Allergy
`Clin Immunol 1989; 83:400–5.
`28 Ezeamuzie CI, Al-Hage M. Effect of anti-asthma drugs on
`human eosinophil superoxide anions release and degranulation.
`Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1998; 115:162–8.
`29 Van Neste D, Ghys L, Antoine JL, Rihoux JP. In vitro effects of
`cetirizine and histamine on human neutrophil function. Ann
`Allergy 1987; 59:13–9.
`30 Konno S, Asano K, Okamoto K, Adachi M. Inhibition of
`cytokine production from human peripheral blood leukocytes
`by anti-allergic agents in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 1994; 264:
`265–8.
`31 Albanesi C, Pastore S, Fanales Belasio E, Girolomoni G.
`Cetirizine and hydrocortisone differentially regulate ICAM-1
`expression and chemokine release in cultured human keratino-
`cytes. Clin Exp Allergy 1998; 28:101–9.
`32 Arnold R, Rihoux J-P, Ko¨nig W. Cetirizine counter-regulates
`interleukin-8 release from human epithelial cells (A549). Clin
`Exp Allergy 1999; 29:1681–91.
`33 Yoneda K, Yamamoto T, Ueta E, Osaki T. Suppression by
`azelastine hydrochloride of NF-kappa B activation involved in
`generation of cytokines and nitric oxide. Jpn J Pharmacol 1997;
`73:145–53.
`34 Brodde OE, Howe U, Egerszegi S, Konietzko N, Michel MC.
`Effect of prednisolone and ketotifen on b2-adrenoceptors in
`asthmatic patients receiving b2-bronchodilators. Eur J Clin
`Pharmacol 1988; 34:145–50.
`35 Yin KS, Hayashi K, Taki F, Watanabe T, Takagi K, Satake T.
`Effect of azelastine on the down regulation of b-adrenoceptors
`in guinea pig lung. Arzneimittelforschung 1991; 41:525–7.
`36 Martin U, Roemn E. Ketotifen, a histamine release inhibitor.
`Mon Allergy 1997; 12:145–9.
`37 Ueta E, Osaki T, Kawasaki N, Nomura Y. Suppression of
`
`respiratory burst of polymorphonuclear leukocytes by azelas-
`tine hydrochloride (Azeptin). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1994;
`47:139–45.
`38 Middleton E Jr, Ferriola P, Drzewiecki G, Sofia RD. The effect
`of azelastine and some other antiasthmatic and antiallergic
`drugs on calmodulin and protein kinase C. Agents Actions
`1989; 28:9–15.
`39 Pagliara A, Testa B, Carrupt PA et al. Molecular properties and
`pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-
`receptor antagonist. J Med Chem 1998; 41:853–63.
`40 Akagi M, Mio M, Miyoshi K, Tasaka K. Antiallergic effects of
`terfenadine on immediate type hypersensitivity reactions.
`Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 1987; 9:257–79.
`41 Chand N, Nolan K, Sofia RD, Diamantis W. Inhibitory effect of
`azelastine on protein kinase C and diphosphoinoositide kinase
`in rat mast cells. Arzneimittelforschung 1990; 40:162–5.
`42 Nakata Y, Hide I. Calcium signaling and protein kinase C for
`TNF-a secretion in a rat mast cell
`line. Life Sci 1998;
`62:1653–7.
`43 Ko¨ller M, Hilger RA, Rihoux JP, Ko¨nig W. Cetirizine exerts
`anti-inflammatory effects on human neutrophils. Int Arch
`Allergy Immunol 1996; 110:52–6.
`44 Rihoux JP, Masliah J, Bereziat G, Ko¨nig W. G proteins as
`biological targets for anti-allergic drugs? Int Arch Allergy
`Immunol 1997; 113:339–41.
`45 Tamaoki J, Yamawaki I, Tagaya E et al. Effect of azelastine on
`platelet-activating factor-induced microvascular leakage in rat
`airways. Am J Physiol 1999; 276:L351–7.
`
`S. HAYASHI
`S. HASHIMOTO*
`First Department of Internal Medicine
`Nihon University School of Medicine
`30-1 Oyaguchikamimachi
`Itabashi-ku
`Tokyo 173–8610
`Japan
`
`*Correspondence
`
`q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 29, 1593–1596
`
`4
`
`