throbber
Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 1999, Volume 29, pages 1593–1596
`
`EDITORIAL
`
`Anti-inflammatory actions of new antihistamines
`
`Histamine has been recognized as a major mediator pro-
`ducing allergic reactions and diseases [1]. Antihistamines
`are widely used for treatment of these conditions. First-
`generation antihistamines (traditional antihistamines) includ-
`ing hydroxyzine, chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine
`display poor selectivity for H1-receptors. They are effective
`in reducing histamine-related symptoms, but the use of them
`have been limited by sedation and troublesome gastro-
`intestinal symptoms due to their penetration of the blood–
`brain barrier and anticholinergic effects,
`respectively.
`Second-generation antihistamines (new antihistamines),
`including terfenadine, feofenadine, cetirizine, ketotifen,
`azelastine and ebastine, which display greater selectivity
`for H1-receptors and lack of penetration of the blood–brain
`barrier, have been developed to reduce these side-effects
`[2–6]. Although second-generation antihistamines display
`antagonistic actions on H1-receptors, several studies have
`demonstrated that
`the ability of new antihistamines to
`attenuate the production of inflammatory reactions, which
`appear to unrelated to their ability to antagonize the effects
`of histamine at H1-receptor sites [2–6]. Thus, new antihista-
`mines can modulate various inflammatory reactions besides
`their H1-receptor antagonism.
`The pathogenesis of allergic inflammation is complex and
`involves multiple inflammatory cells, cytokines and media-
`tors. The clinical efficacy of oral and topical new antihista-
`mines in allergic diseases and their anti-inflammatory
`actions have been investigated. A number of studies demon-
`strate that new antihistamines reduce clinical symptoms of
`allergic diseases. Several studies support the view that new
`antihistamines have anti-inflammatory effects in vivo [5–15].
`For instance, new antihistamines such as cetirizine and
`azelastine attenuate eosinophil recruitment into the site of
`allergic inflammation [8,14], and intracellular adhesion
`molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression on epithelial cells from
`the site of allergic inflammation [11,12,14]. Extensive
`studies have been conducted to clarify the mechanism in
`anti-inflammatory actions of new antihistamines;
`these
`actions are outlined as follows:
`X Downregulation:
`Mediator release
`ICAM-1 expression
`Superoxide generation
`Chemotaxis
`Cytokine expression
`X Upregulation:
`Number and function of b2-adrenoceptor
`New antihistamines can attenuate mediator release. For
`
`instance, new antihistamines inhibit histamine release from
`IgE-sensitized basophils [16,17]. In addition, it has also
`been reported that new antihistamines inhibit the synthesis
`and release of arachinoid acid metabolites including leuko-
`triene C4 from mast cells and basophils [16,18]. Interest-
`ingly, new antihistamines inhibit chemical mediator release
`from cells stimulated with not only IgE but also nonimmuno-
`genic agents including calcium ionophore, indicating that
`antihistamines can block IgE receptor-mediated signal
`pathway as well as other intracellular signal transduction
`pathway(s) [2]. New antihistamines attenuate the recruit-
`ment of eosinophils into the sites of allergic inflammation
`via the inhibition of ICAM-1 expression. For instance,
`cetirizine inhibits eosinophil recruitment into the airway
`of allergic bronchial asthmatics challenged with corre-
`sponding allergen [19]. Similarly, cetirizine inhibits
`eosinophil recruitment into the skin induced by platelet-
`activating factor (PAF) [20]. Analysis of the mechanism in
`cetirizine-dependent attenuation of eosinophil recruitment
`into the sites of allergic inflammation has revealed that
`cetirizine selectively inhibits eosinophil adhesion to human
`umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) but not neutro-
`phils [21]. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that new
`antihistamines such as ketotifen and azelastine inhibit
`ICAM-1
`expression
`on
`tumour
`necrosis
`factor-a
`(TNFa)
`-stimulated HUVEC [22] and nasal epithelial
`cells from the patients with allergic rhinitis challenged
`with corresponding allergen [14,23],
`resulting in the
`attenuation of eosinophil recruitment
`into the sites of
`allergic inflammation. New antihistamines can modulate
`eosinophil functions. Several studies have demonstrated
`that new antihistamines inhibit survival, chemotaxis, gen-
`eration of superoxide and degradation of eosinophils [24–
`28]. Neutrophils are well known to generate superoxide
`anions which cause the tissue damage. Although cetirizine
`dose not inhibit neutrophil recruitment, this drug reduces the
`generation of superoxide anions from neutrophils [29].
`A variety of cells, including lymphocytes, participate in
`the production of allergic inflammation by expressing var-
`ious cytokines. The inhibition of cytokine production which
`promotes allergic inflammation is an important strategy
`controlling allergic inflammation. New antihistamines
`such as azelastine, terfenadine and ketotifen inhibit inter-
`leukin (IL) -2, IL-3, IL-4 and IL-5 production by mitogen-
`stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes [30], indicating
`that these drugs could attenuate the production of allergic
`inflammation by inhibiting the production of TH2-type
`T-lymphocyte-derived cytokines.
`In addition, cetirizine
`
`q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd
`
`1593
`
`CIP2157
`Argentum Pharmaceuticals v. Cipla Ltd.
`IPR2017-00807
`
`1
`
`

`

`1594
`
`S. Hayashi and S. Hashimoto
`
`inhibits monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and
`RANTES production by interferon-stimulated keratinocytes
`[31]. Interestingly, glucocorticosteroids inhibit the produc-
`tion of IL-8 but not monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1)
`and RANTES, indicating that distinct mechanism is involved
`in the regulation of MCP-1 and RANTES production [31].
`Airway epithelial cells are well known to express various
`cytokines which are possibly involved in the production of
`allergic inflammation of the asthmatic airway. In this issue
`of Clinical and Experimental Allergy, Arnold et al. have
`examined the role of cetirizine on IL-8 release from human
`alveolar type U epithelial cell lines, A549 [32]. This study
`demonstrated that cetirizine attenuated IL-8 release by
`TNFa and PMA-stimulated A549, but not by IL-1-b and
`respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-stimulated A549, indi-
`cating that an inhibition of cetirizine on IL-8 release is
`stimulus-dependent. The promoter of the gene contains
`sequences for binding several nuclear transcription factors.
`Transcriptional factors participate to various extents in the
`inducible expression of the genes. Arnold et al. analysed the
`mechanism in the inhibitory effect of cetirizine on IL-8
`release by airway epithelial cells. The results indicated that
`the attenuation of IL-8 release by cetirizine resulted from
`downregulation of accessible DNA-binding sites of the
`nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB). H1-receptor antagonist,
`azelastine, has been shown to inhibit IL-1, IL-6, TNFa and
`granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor mRNA
`expression and DNA-binding activity of NF-kB [33]. NF-kB
`participates to various extent in the inducible expression of
`the genes encoding these cytokines. Thus, the inhibition by
`cetirizine and azelastine of cytokine expression might be
`mediated by the inhibition of DNA-binding activity of
`NF-kB. These studies indicate that NF-kB is a molecular
`target of anti-inflammatory actions of new antihistamines.
`However, a precise mechanism remains to be determined.
`b2-adrenergic bronchodilator is widely used to treat
`bronchial asthma. b2-adrenoceptor desensitization may
`occur during long-term treatment of bronchial asthmatics
`the efficacy
`with b2-adrenergic agonists and may limit
`of b2-adrenergic agonists. New antihistamines have favour-
`ite activities which are increasing the density of b2-
`adrenoceptors and preventing downregulation of the number
`of b2-adrenoceptors. The density of b2-adrenoceptor on
`circulating lymphocytes has been regarded as a model
`frequently used to study b2-adrenoceptor function in man.
`Ketotifen increases b2-adrenoceptor density on lympho-
`cytes from bronchial asthmatics who have been treated
`with b2-adrenergic bronchodilator. The increases in density
`and the improvement of functions of b2-adrenoceptors were
`accompanied by a significant increase in peak expiratory
`flow rate in response to inhaled b2-adrenergic bronchodilator,
`salbutamol [34]. In addition, the number of b2-adrenoceptors
`was higher in azelastine and terbutaline-treated guinea pig
`
`lung than that in terbutaline only, showing that azelastine
`may prevent b-adrenergic agonist-induced downregulation
`of the number of b-adrenoceptors [35].
`There are several possible mechanisms by which new
`antihistamines regulate inflammatory reactions: (1) preven-
`tion of an increase in intracellular calcium and interference
`with calcium utilization, (2) modulation of intracellular
`cAMP levels, (3) inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC)
`activity, (4) inhibition of G-protein function, and (5) inhibi-
`tion of NF-kB binding (Fig. 1). An elevation of intracellular
`calcium levels plays an important step in the activation of
`various intracellular signals such as calcium–calmodulin
`cascades and PKC. Catalytic activation of calcium-
`dependent enzymes which can act as intracellular signals
`elicit a variety of cell functions. New antihistamines can
`modulate intracellular calcium-dependent signal transduc-
`tion pathways at several different mechanisms. Ketotifen
`decreases intracellular calcium levels by preventing calcium
`influx [36]. The inhibition of the binding of calcium to
`calcium channels may account for the prevention of calcium
`influx. Azelastine inhibits superoxide generation by neutro-
`phils in response to phorbol myristyl acetate and formyl-
`methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine and decreases inositol tri-
`phosphate, intracellular free calcium, and PKC activity [37].
`Azelastine can affect calcium–calmodulin pathways. Aze-
`lastine interacts with calmodulin resulting in the inhibition
`of calcium-calmodulin-dependent enzyme, phosphodiester-
`ase [38]. Cetirizine which has ionization and lipophilicity
`behaviour can directly dissolve into the cell membrane and
`stabilize the cell membrane [39], whose pharmacological
`properties may relate to the inhibition of release of calcium
`from intracellular stores. Intracellular cAMP can modulate
`various cell
`functions. Terfenadine,
`inhibits antigen-
`induced histamine release from sensitized guinea pig lung
`and rat peritoneal mast cells [40], and ketotifen also inhibits
`antigen-induced histamine release from human sensitized
`basophils [17], correlating with an increase in intracellular
`cAMP levels which prevents intracellular calcium mobili-
`zation. Azelastine inhibits histamine and TNFa release,
`
`Calcium influx
`Calcium channel
`
`G-protein
`
`Intracellular calcium
`Calcium mobilization
`
`Intracellular cAMP
`
`Protein kinase C
`
`Interacellular calcium store
`Calcium–calmodulin pathway
`
`NF-kB
`
`Cytokine expression
`
`Fig. 1. Intracellular mechanism in anti-inflammatory effects of
`new antihistamines
`
`q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 29, 1593–1596
`
`2
`
`

`

`possibly mediating through the inhibition of PKC activity
`[41,42]. Finally, Ko¨ller and colleagues, and Rihoux and
`colleagues have reported that the inhibition by cetirizine
`of mediator release may result from downregulation of
`G-protein activity [43,44]. Consequently, they have pro-
`posed that G-protein might be a molecular target for anti-
`inflammatory actions of cetirizine. They indicate new
`insight into the mechanism in anti-inflammatory actions of
`new antihistamines. There are a variety type of G-proteins
`which individually regulate intracellular signals and cell
`functions; therefore, the identification of G-protein whose
`functions are modulated by cetirizine and the downstream
`signals of G-protein which regulate mediator release remain
`to be determined.
`Quite recently, Tamaoki et al. have shown that azelastine
`inhibits PAF-induced microvascular leakage in airways,
`possibly involving inhibition of the release of neutrophil
`elastase from activated neutrophils [45]. Their results may
`indicate new pharmacological actions of azelastine.
`In summary, histamines play an important role in the
`production of allergic reactions. New antihistamines repre-
`sent the first line of treatment of these conditions, especially
`in nose, conjunctiva and skin. These drugs can modulate
`various inflammatory reactions besides their H1-receptor
`antagonism. The mechanisms in anti-inflammatory actions
`of new antihistamines have been extensively investigated;
`however, further studies focusing on analysis of intracellu-
`lar mechanism in anti-inflammatory effects are needed to
`clarify the anti-inflammatory actions.
`
`References
`
`1 Bachert C. Histamine — a major role in allergy? Clin Exp
`Allergy, 1998; 28 (Suppl. 6):15–9.
`2 Rimmer SJ, Church MK. The pharmacology and mechanisms
`of action of histamine H1-antagonists. Clin Exp Allergy 1990;
`20 (Suppl. 2):3–17.
`3 Simons FER. The antiallergic effects of antihistamines (H1-
`receptor antagonists). J Allergy Clin Immmunol 1992; 90:
`705–15.
`4 Busse WW. Role of antihistamines in allergic disease. Ann
`Allergy 1994; 72:371–5.
`5 Simons FER, Simons KJ. The pharmacology and use of H1-
`receptor- antagonist drugs. New Engl J Med 1994; 330:1663–
`70.
`6 Du Buske LM. Clinical comparison of histamine H1-receptor
`antagonist drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996; 98:S307–18.
`7 Sheffer AL. Cetirizine: antiallergic therapy beyond traditional
`H1 antihistamines. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 86:1040–
`6.
`8 Re´dier H, Chanez P, De Vos C et al. Inhibitory effect of
`cetirizine on the bronchial eosinophil recruitment induced by
`allergen inhalation challenge in allergic patients with asthma. J
`Allergy Clin Immunol 1992; 37:215–24.
`
`Anti-inflammatory actions of new antihistamines
`
`1595
`
`9 Walsh GM. News and commentary. Clin Exp Allergy 1994;
`24:81–5.
`10 Jinquan T, Reimert CM, Deleuran B, Zacharise C, Simons C,
`Thestrup-Pederson K. Cetirizine inhibits the in vivo and ex
`vivo chemotactic response of T lymphocytes and monocytes. J
`Allergy Clin Immunol 1995; 95:99–86.
`11 Bagnasco B, Canocia CW. Influence of H1-receptor antago-
`nists on adhesion molecules and cellular traffic. Allergy 1995;
`50:17–23.
`12 Fance L, Ciprandi G, Pronzato C et al. Cetirizine reduces
`ICAM-1 on epithelial cells during nasal minimal persistent
`inflammation in asymptomatic children with mite-allergic
`asthma. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1996; 109:272–6.
`13 Gupta SK. Effect of cetirizine and prednisolone on cellular
`infiltration and cytokine mRNA expression during allergen-
`induced late cutaneous responses. Clin Exp Allergy 1996;
`26:68–78.
`14 Ciprandi G, Ricca V, Passalacqua G et al. Seasonal rhinitis and
`azelastine:
`long- or short-term treatment. J Allergy Clin
`Immunol 1997; 99:301–7.
`15 Bousquet J. Antihistamines in severe/chronic rhinitis. Clin Exp
`Allergy 1998; 28 (Suppl. 6):49–53.
`16 Nabe M, Agrawal DK, Sarmiento EU, Townley RG. Inhibitory
`effect of terfenadine on mediator release from human blood
`basophils and eosinophils. Clin Exp Allergy 1989; 19:515–20.
`17 Castillo JG, Sanz ML, Oehling A. Action of ketotifen on
`histamine release and intracellular cAMP levels in basophil
`cultures from pollinic subjects. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)
`1986; 14:107–13.
`18 Nabe M, Miyagawa H, Agrawal DK, Sugiyama H, Townley
`RG. The effect of ketotifen on eosinophils as measured at
`LTC4 release and by chemotaxis. Allergy Proc 1991; 12:267–
`71.
`19 Re´dier H, Chanez P, De Vos C et al. Inhibitory effect of
`cetirizine on the bronchial eosinophil recruitment induced by
`allergen inhalation challenge in allergic patients with asthma. J
`Allergy Clin Immunol 1992; 90:215–24.
`20 Fadel R, David B, Herpin-Richard N, Borgnon A, Rassemont
`R, Rihoux JP. In vivo effects of cetirizine on cutaneous
`reactivity and eosinophil migration induced by platelet-activat-
`ing factor (PAF-acether) in man. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;
`86:314–20.
`21 Kyan-Aung U, Hallsworth M, Haskard D, De Vos C, Lee TH.
`The effects of cetirizine on the adhesion of human eosinophils
`and neutrophils to cultured human umbilical vein endothelial
`cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992; 90:270–2.
`22 Miki I, Kusano A, Ohta S et al. Histamine enhanced the TNF-
`alpha-induced expression of E-selectin and ICAM-1 on vas-
`cular endothelial cells. Cell Immunol 1996; 171:285–8.
`23 Ciprandi G, Pronzato C, Passalacqua G et al. Topical azelastine
`reduces eosinophil activation and intercellular adhesion
`molecule-1 expression on nasal epithelial cells: an antiallergic
`activity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996; 98:1088–96.
`24 Sedgwick JB, Busse WW. Inhibitory effect of cetirizine on
`cytokine-enhanced in vitro eosinophil survival. Ann Allergy
`Asthma Immunol 1997; 78:581–5.
`25 Okada C, Eda R, Miyagawa H et al. Effect of cetirizine on
`
`q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 29, 1593–1596
`
`3
`
`

`

`1596
`
`S. Hayashi and S. Hashimoto
`
`human eosinophil superoxide generation, eosinophil chemo-
`taxis and eosinophil peroxidase in vitro. Int Arch Allergy
`Immunol 1994; 103:384–90.
`26 Eda R, Townley RG, Hopp RJ. Effect of terfenadine on human
`eosinophil and neutrophil chemotactic response and generation
`of superoxide. Ann Allergy 1994; 73:154–60.
`27 Busse W, Randlev B, Sedgwick J. The effect of azelastine on
`neutrophil and eosinophil generation of superoxide. J Allergy
`Clin Immunol 1989; 83:400–5.
`28 Ezeamuzie CI, Al-Hage M. Effect of anti-asthma drugs on
`human eosinophil superoxide anions release and degranulation.
`Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1998; 115:162–8.
`29 Van Neste D, Ghys L, Antoine JL, Rihoux JP. In vitro effects of
`cetirizine and histamine on human neutrophil function. Ann
`Allergy 1987; 59:13–9.
`30 Konno S, Asano K, Okamoto K, Adachi M. Inhibition of
`cytokine production from human peripheral blood leukocytes
`by anti-allergic agents in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 1994; 264:
`265–8.
`31 Albanesi C, Pastore S, Fanales Belasio E, Girolomoni G.
`Cetirizine and hydrocortisone differentially regulate ICAM-1
`expression and chemokine release in cultured human keratino-
`cytes. Clin Exp Allergy 1998; 28:101–9.
`32 Arnold R, Rihoux J-P, Ko¨nig W. Cetirizine counter-regulates
`interleukin-8 release from human epithelial cells (A549). Clin
`Exp Allergy 1999; 29:1681–91.
`33 Yoneda K, Yamamoto T, Ueta E, Osaki T. Suppression by
`azelastine hydrochloride of NF-kappa B activation involved in
`generation of cytokines and nitric oxide. Jpn J Pharmacol 1997;
`73:145–53.
`34 Brodde OE, Howe U, Egerszegi S, Konietzko N, Michel MC.
`Effect of prednisolone and ketotifen on b2-adrenoceptors in
`asthmatic patients receiving b2-bronchodilators. Eur J Clin
`Pharmacol 1988; 34:145–50.
`35 Yin KS, Hayashi K, Taki F, Watanabe T, Takagi K, Satake T.
`Effect of azelastine on the down regulation of b-adrenoceptors
`in guinea pig lung. Arzneimittelforschung 1991; 41:525–7.
`36 Martin U, Roemn E. Ketotifen, a histamine release inhibitor.
`Mon Allergy 1997; 12:145–9.
`37 Ueta E, Osaki T, Kawasaki N, Nomura Y. Suppression of
`
`respiratory burst of polymorphonuclear leukocytes by azelas-
`tine hydrochloride (Azeptin). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1994;
`47:139–45.
`38 Middleton E Jr, Ferriola P, Drzewiecki G, Sofia RD. The effect
`of azelastine and some other antiasthmatic and antiallergic
`drugs on calmodulin and protein kinase C. Agents Actions
`1989; 28:9–15.
`39 Pagliara A, Testa B, Carrupt PA et al. Molecular properties and
`pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-
`receptor antagonist. J Med Chem 1998; 41:853–63.
`40 Akagi M, Mio M, Miyoshi K, Tasaka K. Antiallergic effects of
`terfenadine on immediate type hypersensitivity reactions.
`Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 1987; 9:257–79.
`41 Chand N, Nolan K, Sofia RD, Diamantis W. Inhibitory effect of
`azelastine on protein kinase C and diphosphoinoositide kinase
`in rat mast cells. Arzneimittelforschung 1990; 40:162–5.
`42 Nakata Y, Hide I. Calcium signaling and protein kinase C for
`TNF-a secretion in a rat mast cell
`line. Life Sci 1998;
`62:1653–7.
`43 Ko¨ller M, Hilger RA, Rihoux JP, Ko¨nig W. Cetirizine exerts
`anti-inflammatory effects on human neutrophils. Int Arch
`Allergy Immunol 1996; 110:52–6.
`44 Rihoux JP, Masliah J, Bereziat G, Ko¨nig W. G proteins as
`biological targets for anti-allergic drugs? Int Arch Allergy
`Immunol 1997; 113:339–41.
`45 Tamaoki J, Yamawaki I, Tagaya E et al. Effect of azelastine on
`platelet-activating factor-induced microvascular leakage in rat
`airways. Am J Physiol 1999; 276:L351–7.
`
`S. HAYASHI
`S. HASHIMOTO*
`First Department of Internal Medicine
`Nihon University School of Medicine
`30-1 Oyaguchikamimachi
`Itabashi-ku
`Tokyo 173–8610
`Japan
`
`*Correspondence
`
`q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 29, 1593–1596
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket