throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CIPLA LTD.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Patent No. 8,168,620
`Issue Date: May 1, 2012
`Title: COMBINATION OF AZELASTINE AND STEROIDS
`_______________
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-00807
`
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO
`37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioner Argentum Pharmaceuticals
`
`LLC (“Petitioner”) submits the following objections to the exhibit identified by
`
`Exhibit Number below, which were served by Patent Owner, Cipla Ltd. (“Patent
`
`Owner”), in conjunction with Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response (paper 7).
`
`These objections are timely, having been served within ten business days of the
`
`institution of trial (Paper 11). 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1).
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1002
`
`Federal
`Rule(s) of
`Evidence
`802
`
`1008
`
`802
`
`1034
`
`802
`
`1035
`
`802
`
`Objection
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted (e.g., Ex. 2001 ¶¶27-29; Ex. 2005
`¶¶79, 112-113; Ex. 2007 ¶¶25, 31, 37, 42-47), and
`Petitioner has not had the opportunity to subject the
`declarant(s) to cross examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted (e.g., Ex. 2001 ¶112) , and Petitioner
`has not had the opportunity to subject the
`declarant(s) to cross examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted (e.g., Ex. 2001 ¶82) , and Petitioner
`has not had the opportunity to subject the
`declarant(s) to cross examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted (e.g., Ex. 2001 ¶¶45, 49) , and
`Petitioner has not had the opportunity to subject the
`declarant(s) to cross examination
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`1036
`
`802
`
`1039
`
`802
`
`1040
`
`802
`
`1045
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted (e.g., Ex. 2001 ¶¶45, 49) , and
`Petitioner has not had the opportunity to subject the
`declarant(s) to cross examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted (e.g., Ex. 2001 ¶¶45, 49) , and
`Petitioner has not had the opportunity to subject the
`declarant(s) to cross examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted (e.g., Ex. 2001 ¶82) , and Petitioner
`has not had the opportunity to subject the
`declarant(s) to cross examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted (e.g., Ex. 2001 ¶108) , and Petitioner
`has not had the opportunity to subject the
`declarant(s) to cross examination
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`2001
`¶¶15-17,
`19, 27-29,
`45, 46, 49,
`61-64, 71,
`73, 77, 82,
`88-92, 94,
`97, 99-
`102, 105-
`106, 108,
`110, 112,
`116, 118-
`119, 121-
`126, 128-
`129, 131-
`132, 135-
`136, 138-
`140, 142-
`152
`
`2003
`¶¶2, 11-
`20, 22-27
`
`402/403;
`802
`
`402/403: Petitioner objects to Patent Owner’s
`evidence regarding the alleged success, copying, and
`other alleged secondary considerations stemming
`from the Duonase product marketed and sold in India
`as being irrelevant, and having prejudicial value that
`outweighs any probative value.
`802: Inadmissible hearsay, as Dr. Carr relies on
`various cited documents and/or other “out-of-court”
`statements for the truth of the matter asserted therein;
`Petitioner was not a party to and did not participate
`in the trial referenced at paragraph 13 of Dr. Carr’s
`declaration, and therefore has not had any
`opportunity to cross examine any of the witnesses or
`declarants that provided evidence in that case.
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as Dr. D’Addio relies on
`various cited documents and/or other “out-of-court”
`statements for the truth of the matter asserted therein.
`
`4
`
`

`

`402/403;
`702/703;
`802
`
`
`
`2005
`¶¶3-4, 16-
`20, 22-35,
`37-67, 69-
`71, 73-91,
`93-101,
`103-106,
`112, 116;
`TABS 1-
`12 (pp. 54-
`70)
`
`402/403: Petitioner objects to Patent Owner’s
`evidence regarding the alleged success, copying, and
`other alleged secondary considerations stemming
`from the Duonase product marketed and sold in India
`as being irrelevant, and having prejudicial value that
`outweighs any probative value.
`702/703/403: Inadequate showing of witness’
`qualifications to opine on topics discussed in
`declaration; in addition, while expert testimony can
`rely on otherwise inadmissible evidence, Petitioner
`objects to the extent that it has not been provided
`sufficient access to such evidence, or discovery of
`other evidence in Patent Owner’s possession or
`control that may undercut or contradict the evidence
`relied upon by this witness, as Petitioner was not a
`party to the prior litigation involving Dymista;
`Petitioner further objects to Dr. Jarosz’s
`characterization of the cited exhibits being of the
`type normally relied upon by experts in this field.
`802: Inadmissible hearsay, as Dr. Jarosz relies on
`various cited documents and/or other “out-of-court”
`statements for the truth of the matter asserted therein;
`Petitioner was not a party to and did not participate
`in the trial involving Dymista, and therefore has not
`had any opportunity to cross examine any of the
`witnesses or declarants that provided evidence in that
`case
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`2007
`¶¶15, 17,
`25, 31, 33,
`36-37, 40-
`50, 55-56,
`64-83
`
`402/403;
`702/703;
`802
`
`2009
`
`802
`
`2010
`
`802
`
`402/403: Petitioner objects to Patent Owner’s
`evidence regarding the alleged success, copying, and
`other alleged secondary considerations stemming
`from the Duonase product marketed and sold in India
`as being irrelevant, and having prejudicial value that
`outweighs any probative value.
`702/703/403: Petitioner objects to Dr. Smyth’s
`testimony at ¶¶64-74 to the effect that Dymista and
`Duonase are embodiments of claims 4, 29, and 42-44
`(and therefore the claims from which they depend),
`and regarding the alleged “imitator products,”
`because Petitioner was not a party to the referenced
`litigation, has not been provided sufficient access to
`such evidence or to cross examine the author(s) of
`Ex. 2028, or been afforded discovery of other
`evidence in Patent Owner’s possession or control that
`may undercut or contradict the evidence relied upon
`by this witness.
`802: Inadmissible hearsay, as Dr. Smyth relies on
`various cited documents and/or other “out-of-court”
`statements for the truth of the matter asserted therein;
`Petitioner was not a party to and did not participate
`in the trial referenced at paragraph 11 of Dr. Smyth’s
`declaration, and therefore has not had any
`opportunity to cross examine any of the witnesses or
`declarants that provided evidence in that case.
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`2017
`
`802
`
`2018
`
`802
`
`2019
`
`802
`
`2020
`
`802
`
`2021
`
`802
`
`2022
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`2023
`
`802
`
`2024
`
`802
`
`2025
`
`802
`
`2027
`
`802
`
`2028
`
`802
`
`2029
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`2030
`
`802
`
`2031
`
`802
`
`2032
`
`802
`
`2034
`
`802
`
`2036
`
`802
`
`2037
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`2039
`
`802
`
`2040
`
`802
`
`2041
`
`802
`
`2042
`
`802
`
`2043
`
`802
`
`2044
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`2045
`
`802
`
`2046
`
`802
`
`2047
`
`802
`
`2048
`
`802
`
`2049
`
`802
`
`2050
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`2051
`
`802
`
`2052
`
`802
`
`2053
`
`802
`
`2054
`
`802
`
`2055
`
`802
`
`2056
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`2057
`
`802
`
`2058
`
`802
`
`2061
`
`802
`
`2064
`
`802
`
`2065
`
`802
`
`2066
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`2067
`
`802
`
`2068
`
`802
`
`2069
`
`802
`
`2070
`
`802
`
`2071
`
`802
`
`2072
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`14
`
`

`

`
`
`2074
`
`802
`
`2075
`
`802
`
`2076
`
`802
`
`2077
`
`802
`
`2078
`
`802
`
`2080
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
`2081
`
`802
`
`2082
`
`802
`
`2083
`
`802
`
`2084
`
`802
`
`2085
`
`802
`
`2086
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`16
`
`

`

`
`
`2087
`
`802
`
`2088
`
`802
`
`2089
`
`802
`
`2090
`
`802
`
`2091
`
`802
`
`2092
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`17
`
`

`

`
`
`2093
`
`802
`
`2094
`
`802
`
`2095
`
`802
`
`2096
`
`802
`
`2097
`
`802
`
`2098
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`18
`
`

`

`
`
`2103
`
`802
`
`2104
`
`802
`
`2105
`
`802
`
`2110
`
`802
`
`2111
`
`802
`
`2112
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`19
`
`

`

`
`
`2113
`
`802
`
`2120
`
`802
`
`2121
`
`802
`
`2122
`
`802
`
`2129
`
`802
`
`2130
`
`802
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`20
`
`

`

`
`
`2131
`
`802
`
`2133
`
`802
`
`2136
`
`802
`
`2138
`
`802
`
`
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`Inadmissible hearsay, as the document appears to be
`relied upon by Patent Owner for the truth of the
`matter asserted , and Petitioner has not had the
`opportunity to subject the declarant(s) to cross
`examination
`
`These objections provide notice to Patent Owner that Petitioner may move
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(c) to exclude these Exhibits or the cited portions thereof.
`
`Petitioner is available to meet-and-confer with Patent Owner to clarify/discuss any
`
`of the above objections should Patent Owner believe such discussions would be
`
`helpful to resolve Petitioner’s objections.
`
`
`
`
`
`21
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 5, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Michael R. Houston/
`
`Reg. No. 58,486
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1) was served on September 5, 2017, on Counsel for Patent
`
`Owner via electronic mail to the following:
`
`
`
`dvarughe-PTAB@skgf.com
` dsterlin-PTAB@skgf.com
` alarock-PTAB@skgf.com
` ueverett-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 5, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Michael R. Houston/
`
`Reg. No. 58,486
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`23
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket