throbber
PIED~
`
`PHARMACEUTICALS
`
`MEMORANDUM
`
`To: Maria Carell, AI Triunfo, Jeff Hostler, Joey Evans, Stuart Loesch
`
`From: Jeff Hofmeister
`Date: August 1, 2014
`
`Subject: CVS Caremark Formulary Decisions - 2015
`
`CVS Caremark
`CVS Caremark, the second largest PBM in the U.S. with approximately 60MM pharmacy lives,
`announced today their formulary exclusions for 2015. These changes will become effective January 1,
`2015. These products will be excluded on approximately 60% of the CVS Caremark lives.
`
`Dymista
`Dymista was excluded by CVS Caremark beginning in 2014 and will remain blocked in 2015.
`Fluticasone will remain in the generic tier while Nasonex remains the only Tier 2 Nasal Steroid on their
`formulary. The remaining Nasal Steroid branded products will also be excluded. In 2014 and now in
`2015, Dymista was placed in the Nasal Steroid market basket which required us to bid to replace
`Nasonex as the preferred formulary item (in an excluded category, they will only have one preferred
`product). We made numerous attempts to be moved to the nasal antihistamine category or to an
`exclusive category of our own but were not successful. In January of2014, Dr. Nancy Ruiz met with
`the Caremark VP of Pharmacy to discuss Dymista and its category placement. Despite these efforts we
`remained in the Nasal Steroid category.
`
`For the 2015 formulary year, we enhanced our rebate offers in an effort to replace Nasonex. We offered
`58% plus admin fee for Tier 2 and 15% plus admin fee for Tier 3. Feedback from the client this week
`regarding Dymista was: "Your rebate was phenomenal; however you still can't replace the Nasonex
`It's anticipated they will rebid the category when Nasonex goes generic.
`dollars".
`Currently, even with the restriction on 60% of their lives, approximately 39% of the Dymista
`prescriptions are adjudicating unrestricted. In Q1 2014 we paid rebates for Tier 3 (15% +Admin fee) on
`28,000 Dymista prescriptions. This does not include the number ofDymista prescriptions filled by use
`of the McKesson override program for claims that were blocked. We anticipate these numbers of
`adjudicated claims with Caremark to continue to grow.
`
`Aero span
`While historically the asthma category has seen little formulary management, we have seen that change
`drastically in the last 12-18 months. With recent additions to the category of Alvesco and now
`Aerospan, there are now 6 products in the category with no generics in the class. Discussions with
`customers have centered on the premise that they see no real differentiation and therefore are beginning
`to treat the category as more of a commodity. While you won't see the category limited to one product
`like we do for Dymista, you can expect to see limits and restrictions. With 6 products, payers can create
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-
`SUBJECT TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`PLAINTIFFS'
`TRIAL EXHIBIT
`PTX0447
`
`MEDA_APTX01921748
`
`PTX0447 -00001
`
`1
`
`CIP2095
`Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Cipla Ltd.
`IPR2017-00807
`
`

`

`a situation where companies have to bid against each other to be 1 of 4 on formulary, with the
`remaining products being blocked and restricted. Rebate percentages and prescription volume are both
`considered in the final determination of formulary inclusion.
`
`With the launch of Aerospan in April of2014, we have been adjudicating at Tier 3 unrestricted with
`CVS Caremark. That will continue for the balance of 2014. In January of 2015, Aero span will be on
`the excluded list in this category along with Alvesco. Tier 2 formulary products will be QV AR,
`Pulmicort Flexhaler, Asmanex and Flovent. The excluded formularies impact approximately 60% of
`the CVS Caremark lives. We will be Tier 3 on the balance of their lives.
`
`With the acquisition of Aerospan in October of2013 , we began to schedule appointments with payers to
`discuss formulary inclusion. We met with CVS Caremark in January of2014. Dr. Nancy Ruiz did the
`clinical presentation for the CVS Caremark, VP. of Pharmacy. Numerous subsequent meetings were
`held between our Account Manager and their contracting team. The 2015 bid requests came to us in
`May of2014. Knowing that this was going to be an excluded category we enhanced our bids to 47% +
`admin to be in the Tier 2 position and 20% + admin to be Tier 3 unrestricted. Feedback from the client
`indicated: "it was a fight to the end Our contract was good Very low volume killed us. Qvar was still
`the lowest net which means they went deeper than they did last year". If we can show increases in
`volume and a positive trend, we will have an opportunity again in 2016 to remove the restrictions and
`become a Tier 2 preferred product.
`
`I would anticipate approval rates for Aerospan to be similar to that ofDymista in 2015. Currently, we
`are seeing approximately 39% ofDymista prescriptions adjudicating at a Tier 3 position.
`
`• Page 2
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-
`SUBJECT TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MEDA_APTX01921749
`
`PTX044 7-00002
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket