JOHN C. JAROSZ
`Managing Principal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Phone: (202) 530-3980
`Fax: (202) 530-0436
`
`john.jarosz@analysisgroup.com
`
`
`John Jarosz, a Managing Principal of Analysis Group, Inc., specializes in applied microeconomics and
`industrial organization. He has performed research, given economic testimony and provided strategy
`consultation in intellectual property, licensing, and commercial damages matters, including
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Analysis Group, Inc.
` 800 17th Street, NW
`
` Suite 400
` Washington, DC 20006
`
` 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`evaluation of damages in patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark and unfair competition cases
`(including lost profits, reasonable royalties, price erosion, unjust enrichment, accelerated market
`entry, and prejudgment interest);
`evaluation of injunctive relief and commercial success in a variety of intellectual property cases;
`strategy consultation regarding the nature and value of technology, methods to share technology and
`reasonable compensation terms;
`analysis of compliance with FRAND/RAND commitments; and
`
` general commercial damages testimony in a variety of cases and across numerous industries.
`
`Mr. Jarosz received a J.D. from the University of Wisconsin. Mr. Jarosz holds an M.A. in Economics
`from Washington University in St. Louis, where he was a Ph.D. candidate and completed most of the
`program requirements. He also holds a B.A. in Economics and Organizational Communication from
`Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska.
`
`Prior to joining Analysis Group, Mr. Jarosz was a Director with Putnam, Hayes & Bartlett, Inc. Before
`that, he was a Senior Analyst with Richard J. Barber Associates, a Section Supervisor with Mutual of
`Omaha Insurance and a Research Analyst with the Center for the Study of American Business.
`
`
`
`EDUCATION
`
`
`
`
`J.D.
`M.A. & Ph.D. candidate
`B.A., Summa Cum Laude
`
`University of Wisconsin
`Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
`Economics and Organizational Communication, Creighton University
`
`
`
`1
`
`CIP2006
`Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Cipla Ltd.
`IPR2017-00807
`
`

`

`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 2
`
`
`
`PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
`
` 
`
` American Economic Association
` American Law and Economics Association
` American Bar Association (Sections: Intellectual Property, Antitrust and Litigation)
` State Bar of Wisconsin (Section: Intellectual Property)
` American Intellectual Property Law Association (Sections: Federal Litigation, Licensing, Trade
`Secrets and Antitrust)
` Licensing Executives Society
`• Former Chair, Valuation and Taxation Committee
`• Former Member, Certified Licensing Professional Exam Writing Team
` Former Advisory Board - The IP Litigator
` Former Columnist (Damage Awards) - The IP Litigator
` Omicron Delta Epsilon (International Honor Society in Economics)
` Association of University Technology Managers
` Certified Licensing Professional
`Intellectual Property Owners Association (Committee: Damages and Injunctions)
`
` 2011 Presidential Rank Review Board
` Referee, Journal of Forensic Economics
` The Sedona Conference (Sections: Best Practices in Patent Litigation, Patent Damages and
`Remedies)
`IAM Patent 1000 (2014, 2015, 2016): The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners - Economic Experts
`IP Law360: Voices of the Bar
`
`
`
`
`TESTIMONIAL EXPERIENCE
`
`Patent Cases – Damages
`
` Audio MPEG, Inc., U.S. Philips Corporation, TDF SAS, and Institut Für Rundfunktechnik
`GmbH v. Dell, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division (Case No. 1:15-CV-1674
`AJT/TCB)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: analysis of patent pool compliance with FRAND
`commitments and determination of FRAND-compliant royalties involving patents directed to the
`transmission and storage of digital audio files.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 3
`
`
`
` Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and Philips Electronics North America Corporation v.
`ZOLL Medical Corporation
`United States District Court, District of Massachusetts (Case No. 1:10-cv-11041)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits and reasonable royalty damages related to
`alleged patent infringement involving external defibrillators.
` Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly and Company and Brookshire Brothers, Inc.
`US District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Case No. 2:15-cv-1202-WCB)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty damages related to alleged
`patent infringement directed to phosphodiesterase (PDE) V inhibitor(s) indicated for the treatment of
`benign prostatic hyperplasia.
` Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and Philips Electronics North America Corporation v.
`ZOLL Lifecor Corporation
`United States District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania (Case No. 2:2012-cv-01369)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: damages related to alleged patent infringement involving
`wearable defibrillators.
` Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Shenzhen Liown Electronics Co., Ltd, Central Garden and Pet
`Co., et al.; Shenzhen Liown Electronics Co., Ltd, Central Garden and Pet Co. v. Luminara
`Worldwide, LLC, et al. ; and Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Shenzhen Liown Electronics Co.,
`Ltd and Central Garden and Pet Co., et al.
`United States District Court, District of Minnesota (Case Nos. 14-cv-03103 (SRN/FLN) and 15-cv-
`03028 (SRN/FLN))
`Deposition testimony and expert reports: damages associated with alleged patent infringement and
`breach of contract, and unjust enrichment associated with breach of non-disclosure agreement and
`use of trade secrets, related to flameless candle technology and distribution.
` MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. Apple, Inc.
` United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 10-258-SLR)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty involving patents directed to
`incoming call, playlist, and location detection features used in smartphones, tablets, and portable
`media players.
` MAZ Encryption Technologies LLC v. Blackberry Corporation
` United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 1:13-cv-00304-LPS)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty involving a patent directed to
`encryption/decryption methods used in smartphone and tablet operating systems.
` BroadSoft, Inc. v. Callwave Communications, LLC
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 13-cv-0711-RGA)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to telecommunications call processing.
` Advanced Video Technologies, LLC v. Blackberry, LTD. and Blackberry Corporation
` United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:11-cv-06604-CM-RLE)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to video compression and decompression.
` Drone Technologies, Inc. v. Parrot S.A. and Parrot, Inc.
`United States District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania (Case No. 2:14-cv-0111)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving a patent directed to drone technology.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 4
`
`
`
` Bayer CropScience AG and Bayer CropScience NV v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, Mycogen Plant
`Science Inc., Agrigenetics, Inc. d/b/a Mycogen Seeds LLC, and Phytogen Seed Company, LLC
`International Chamber of Commerce (Case No. 18892/VRO /AGF)
`Arbitration hearing testimony and expert report: damages associated with alleged breach of contract
`and patent infringement involving genetically modified seed.
` CertusView Technologies, LLC v. S &N Locating Services LLC and S & N Communications,
`Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division (Case No. 2:13 –cv-346
`(MSD/LRL))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to creation of electronic sketches for utility location purposes.
` Ecolab USA Inc. and Kleancheck Systems, LLC v. Diversey, Inc.
`United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Civil Action No. 12-cv-1984 (SRN/JJG))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty, and prejudgment interest
`involving products covering the monitoring of hospital cleaning.
` Everlight Electronics Co. Ltd., and Emcore Corporation v. Nichia Corporation and Nichia
`America Corporation v. Everlight Americas, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division (Case No.4:12-cv-
`11758 GAD-MKM)
`Trial and deposition testimony, expert report and declaration: commercial success, lost profits,
`reasonable royalty, and prejudgment interest involving patents directed to LEDs.
` Source Search Technologies, LLC v. Kayak.com, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No. 2:11-cv-03388-FSH-MAH)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to online exchanges.
` Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.
`United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division (Case No.SACV12-
`329AG (JPRx))
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to universal remotes.
` Prowess, Inc. v. RaySearch Laboratories AB, et al.
`United States District Court, District of Maryland (Case No. 11 CV 1357 (WDQ))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to treatment planning software for radiation therapy.
` JDS Therapeutics, LLC and Nutrition 21, LLC v. Pfizer Inc., Wyeth LLC, Wyeth Consumer
`Healthcare Ltd., and Wyeth Consumer Healthcare LLC
`United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No.1:12-cv-09002-JSR)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success, reasonable royalty, and unjust
`enrichment involving patents and trade secrets directed to the use of chromium picolinate in multi-
`vitamins.
`comScore, Inc. v. Moat, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division (Case No. 2:12CV695-
`HCM/DEM, Lead Case 2:12CV351-HCM/DEM)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to online analytics.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Impulse Technology Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts, Inc., Ubisoft Holdings,
`Inc., and Konami Digital Entertainment Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 11-586-RGA-CJB)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty involving patents directed to video game
`motion detection functionalities.
` LendingTree, LLC v. Zillow, Inc., NexTag, Inc., and Adchemy, Inc.
`United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division (Case No. 3-
`:10-cv-439-FDW-DCK)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment
`interest involving patents directed to internet loan matching systems.
` Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.
`United States District Court, Northern District of California (Case No. 3:12-cv-01106-WHA)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to network security systems.
` Shurtape Technologies, LLC and Shurtech Brands, LLC v. 3M Company
`United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina (Case No.5:11-cv-00017)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to painter’s tape.
` Abbott Biotechnology Ltd. and AbbVie, Inc. v. Centocor Ortho Biothech, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Massachusetts (Case No. 09-40089-FDS)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
` Wi-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.; Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson; Ericsson Inc.;
`Sony Mobile Communications AB; Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.; HTC
`Corporation; HTC America, Inc.; Exedea Inc.; LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics
`Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.; and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 6:10-CV-521-LED)
`Trial and deposition testimony, affidavit, and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment
`interest involving patents directed to wireless telecommunication systems.
` Epos Technologies Ltd.; Dane-Elec S.A.; Dane-Elec Memory S.A.; and Dane-Elec Corporation
`USA v. Pegasus Technologies Ltd. and Luidia, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Columbia (Case No. 07-cv-00416-WMN)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to digital pen products.
` Life Technologies Corporation; Applied Biosystems, LLC; Institute for Protein Research;
`Alexander Chetverin; Helena Chetverina; and William Hone v. Illumina, Inc. and Solexa, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of California (Case No. 3:11-cv-00703)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to DNA amplification and sequencing technology.
` TomTom, Inc. v. Michael Adolph
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia (Case No. 6:10-CV-521-LED)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to automotive navigation systems.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 6
`
`
` Carl B. Collins and Farzin Davanloo v. Nissan North America, Inc. and Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Case No.2:11-cv-00428-
`JRG)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to automotive engines.
`I.E.E. International Electronics & Engineering, S.A. and IEE Sensing, Inc. v. TK Holdings, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan (Case No. 2:10-cv-13487)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to capacitive sensing used in automotive seats.
` St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Acer, Inc., et al./Microsoft Corporation v.
`St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 09-354-JJF, 09-704-JJF and 10-282-
`LPS)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to power management, bus configuration and card slot technology in
`laptops and desktops.
` CardioFocus, Inc. v. Xintec Corporation (d/b/a Convergent Laser Technologies); Trimedyne,
`Inc.; and Cardiogenesis Corporation
`United States District Court, District of Massachusetts (Case No. 1:08-cv-10285 NMG)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to laser devices used for the treatment of advanced coronary artery disease.
` Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Raritan Americas, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No. 10-cv-6100 (PKC)(JLC))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, lost royalties, reasonable royalty and
`prejudgment interest involving a patent and contract directed to software and hardware products and
`technologies that provide connectivity and centralized management of IT infrastructure through
`KVM switches.
` Frontline Placement Technologies, Inc. v. CRS, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Case No. 2:07-CV-2457)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, lost royalties, reasonable royalty and
`prejudgment interest involving a patent and contract directed to automated substitute fulfillment
`software.
` Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. v. Danisco A/S; Genecor International
`Wisconsin, Inc.; Danisco US Inc.; and Danisco USA Inc.
`United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin (Case No. 10-CV-251)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report and expert declaration: lost profits, reasonable
`royalty, prejudgment interest and irreparable harm involving a patent directed to alpha-amylases used
`for fuel ethanol.
` Triangle Software, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.; Garmin USA, Inc.; TomTom, Inc.; and
`Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division (Case No. 1:10-CV-
`01457-CMH-TCB)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to providing personal navigation devise functionality.
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 7
`
`
`
` Northeastern University and JARG Corporation v. Google, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Case No. 2:07-cv-
`486(CE))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to internet index and search technology.
` Bissell Homecare, Inc. v. Dyson, Inc.
`United States District Court, Western District of Michigan (Case No. 1:08-cv-724)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to vacuum cleaner collection and discharge.
` Toshiba Corporation v. Imation Corp.; Moser Baer India Ltd; Glyphics Media, Inc.; Ritek
`Corp.; Advanced Media, Inc.; CMC Magnetics Corp.; Hotan Corp.; and Khypermedia Corp.
`United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin (Case No. 3:09-cv-00305-slc)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to DVDs.
` Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. v. BMW North America, LLC, et al.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division (Case No. 9:08-CV-00164-
`RC)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to connecting a portable audio player to an automobile sound system.
` Regents of the University of Minnesota v. AGA Medical Corp.
`United States District Court, District of Minnesota (Case No. 0:07-cv-04732 (PJS/RLE))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to septal occlusion devices.
` Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Hologic Inc. and Suros Surgical Systems, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division (Case No. 07-cv-00834)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits and reasonable royalty involving patents
`directed to biopsy equipment and methods, and the biopsy of soft tissue.
` Humanscale Corp. v. CompX International, Inc. and CompX Waterloo
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division (Case No. 3:09-CV-86-
`JRS)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to keyboard support mechanisms.
` Carl Zeiss Vision GMBH and Carl Zeiss Vision International GMBH v. Signet Armorlite, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of California (Case No. 09-CV-0657-DMS (POR))
`Trial testimony and deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty, and lost
`licensing fees involving a patent directed to progressive eyeglass lenses.
` ShopNTown LLC v. Landmark Media Enterprises, LLC
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division (Case No. 2:08CV564)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to rental matching systems over the internet.
` Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc.
`United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Western Division (Case No. 04-1033-CV-
`W-GAF)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits and reasonable royalty involving patents
`directed to electronic ICU monitoring systems.
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 8
`
`
`
` Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc.; Schering Corp.; and Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v.
`Apotex/Novopharm Limited
`Federal Court of Canada (Case No. T-1161-07/T-161-07)
`Trial testimony and expert report: lost profits and reasonable royalty involving a patent directed to
`hypertension treatment.
` C2 Communications Technologies, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corp; Global Crossing
`Telecommunications, Inc.; and Level 3 Communications, LLC
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Case No. 2-06CV-241
`TJW)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving a patent directed to carrying PSTN calls via Voice over Internet Protocol.
` Siemens AG v. Seagate Technology
`United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division (Case No. SA CV 06-
`788 JVS (ANx))
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving a patent directed to hard disk drive technology.
` Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 07-190-SLR)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty, and prejudgment
`interest involving patents directed to medical scanner technology.
` Aventis Pharma, S.A. v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
`Arbitration
`Arbitration hearing and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment
`interest involving a patent directed to hemophilia treatment.
` Every Penny Counts, Inc. v. Bank of America Corp. and Bank of America, N.A.
`United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division (Case No.2:07-CV-42-
`FTM-29SPC)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to the Keep the Change debit card program.
` DEKALB Genetics Corp. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc.; Golden Harvest Seeds, Inc.; Sommer Bros.
`Seed Co.; JR Robinson Seeds, Inc.; and Garst Seed Co.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri (Case No.4:06CV01191MLM)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to genetically modified corn.
`International Flora Technologies, Ltd. v. Clarins U.S.A.
`United States District Court, District of Arizona (Case No.2:06-CV-01371-ROS)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to skin care products.
` Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.; Centerpulse Orthpedics, Inc. (formerly known as
`Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.); and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No.05-0897 (WHW))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty, and prejudgment interest
`involving a patent directed to hip implant technology.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 9
`
`
`
` Elan Pharma International, Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No.06-438-GMS)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to nanotechnology drug delivery.
` Mobile Micromedia Solutions LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division (Case No.505-CV-230)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to automotive entertainment systems.
` Nichia Corp. v. Seoul Semiconductor, Ltd. and Seoul Semiconductor, Inc.
`United States District Court, Northern District of California (Case No. 3:06-CV-00162-MMC (JCS))
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty, unjust enrichment, and
`prejudgment interest involving patents directed to light emitting diodes.
` NetRatings, Inc. v. WebSideStory, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No. 06-CV-878(LTS)(AJP))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty involving technology directed to internet
`audience measurement and analysis.
` Ernest K. Manders, M.D. v. McGhan Medical Corp.
`United States District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania (Case No. 02-CV-1341)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to implantable tissue expanders.
` Source Search Technologies, LLC v. LendingTree, Inc.; IAC/InterActiveCorp; and
`ServiceMagic, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No. 2:04-CV-4420)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to online exchanges.
` The Boeing Co. v. The United States
`United States Court of Federal Claims (Case No. 00-705 C)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving a patent directed to a process for aging aluminum lithium alloys used for space shuttle
`external tanks.
` Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. and Bridgestone Golf, Inc. v. Acushnet Co.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 05-132-(JJF))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to cores, intermediate layers and covers of golf balls.
` Dyson Technology Ltd. and Dyson, Inc. v. Maytag Corp.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 05-434-GMS)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to upright cyclonic vacuum cleaners.
` Verizon Services Corp. and Verizon Laboratories, Inc. v. Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage
`America, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia (Case No. 1:06CV682)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: permanent injunction, lost profits, and reasonable
`royalty involving patents directed to a voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) platforms.
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Hitachi, LTD v. BorgWarner, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 05-048-SLR)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to automotive cam shaft technology.
`Innogenetics N.V. v. Abbott Laboratories
`United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin (Case No. 05-C-0575-C)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty involving a patent directed to
`HCV genotyping.
` O2 Micro International v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
`United States District Court, Northern District of California (Case No. 04-02000 CW; 06-02929
`CW)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to AC to DC power converter circuits used for backlights.
` Solvay Solexis, Inc. v. 3M Co.; 3M Innovative Properties Co.; and Dyneon LLC
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No. 04-06162 (FSH/PS))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to low temperature fluoroelastomers.
` Target Technology Co., LLC v. Williams Advanced Materials, Inc., et al.
`United States District Court, Central District of California (Case No. SACV04-1083 DOC (MLGx))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and design-around alternatives involving
`a patent directed to silver alloy sputtering targets for DVDs.
` Metrologic Instruments, Inc. v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No. 03cv2912 (HAA))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to bar code scanners.
` Eaton Corp. v. ZF Meritor, LLC
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan (Case No. 03-74844)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to truck clutches and transmissions.
` Meritor Transmission Corp. v. Eaton Corp.
`United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina (Case No. 1:04-CV-178)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to truck transmissions.
` Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 04-305-SLR)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty involving patents directed to genetically
`modified corn seed.
`Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dorel Industries, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana (Case No. 1:04-CV-1102)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: damages and profits associated with alleged contract breach
`and patent infringement involving technology directed to automobile child restraint systems.
` Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Case No. 2-04CV-211)
`(DF)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty involving patents directed to hybrid-
`electric powertrain systems.
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`John C. Jarosz, page 11
`
`
`
` GTECH Corp. v. Scientific Games International
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 04-0138)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty, and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to a system and method for distributing lottery tickets.
` WEDECO UV Technologies, Inc. v. Calgon Carbon Corp.
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No. 01-924)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty, and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to treatment of potable water with UV light.
` Khyber Technologies Corp. v. Casio, Inc; Everex Systems, Inc.; Hewlett-Packard Co.; and
`Hewlett-Packard Singapore PTE. LTD.
`United States District Court, District of Massachusetts (Case No. 99-CV-12468-GAO)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to audio playback for portable electronic devices.
` Air Liquide America, L.P. v. P.H. Glatfelter Co.
`United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania (Case No. 1:CV-04-0646)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to the use of ozone bleaching of pulp.
` Gary J. Colassi v. Cybex International, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Massachusetts (Case No. 02-668-JEL/JGL)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving a patent directed to treadmill support decks.
` Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp. and Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No. 03 C iv.2604 (SAS))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty analysis and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to connectors for coronary and peripheral stents.
` Donner, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.; McDavid Plano-Acura, L.P.; and The Beaumont
`Co.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division (Case No.F:03-CV-253)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to automobile entertainment systems.
` Nonin Medical, Inc. v. BCI, Inc.
`United States District Court, Fourth Division of Minnesota (Case No.02-668-JEL/JGL)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty, lost profits, and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to finger clip pulse oximeters.
` Stryker Trauma S.A. and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Synthes (USA)
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No.01-CV 3879 (DMC))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty,