`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CIPLA LIMITED
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00807
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,168,620
`_____________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00807
`U.S. Patent No. 8,168,620
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Order of April 10, 2018 (Paper 40), the parties
`
`
`
`served objections on each other seven business days prior to Oral Argument, and
`
`subsequently met and conferred in a good-faith attempt to resolve their differences.
`
`The parties came to an agreement regarding some objections, but a few remain
`
`unresolved and are addressed here. The objections below “identify with
`
`particularity which portions of the demonstrative exhibits are subject to objection,
`
`include a copy of the objected-to portions, and include a one-sentence statement of
`
`the reason for each objection,” as required by the Board. (Paper 40, 3).
`
`Objections to slide 19 (objected-to in its entirety)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00807
`U.S. Patent No. 8,168,620
`
`Patent Owner objects to Petitioner’s slide 19 because it presents new
`
`
`
`argument that was not raised in the Reply (Paper 30).
`
`Objections to slide 20 (objected-to portion boxed in purple)
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner objects to Petitioner’s slide 20 as misleading because it
`
`suggests that Dr. Govindarajan was a declarant in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`Objections to slide 22 (objected-to portion boxed in purple)
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00807
`U.S. Patent No. 8,168,620
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner objects to Petitioner’s slide 22 because it presents new
`
`arguments that were not raised in the Petition or Reply, and relies on evidence that
`
`was used in the Petition and Reply to support different points (see Reply at 2-3,
`
`26).
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00807
`U.S. Patent No. 8,168,620
`
`Objections to slide 26 (objected-to portion boxed in purple)
`
`
`
`Patent Owner objects to Petitioner’s slide 26 because the right-most figure
`
`presented in that slide appears nowhere in the Petition or Reply, is different from
`
`the figure that appears in EX1144 ¶¶ 62-64, and was not relied upon by Dr.
`
`Schleimer.
`
`These objections are made within two business days of the May 16, 2018
`
`oral hearing as required by the Board’s Order. (Paper 40.) Patent Owner does not
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`acquiesce that any material not objected to is properly before the Board.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00807
`U.S. Patent No. 8,168,620
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 14, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Dennies Varughese/
`Dennies Varughese
`Registration No. 61,868
`Lead Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e))
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above-captioned “PATENT
`
`OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS”
`
`was served in its entirety on May 14, 2018, upon the following parties via
`
`electronic mail upon the following counsel of record for the Petitioner:
`
`Michael R. Houston: mhouston@foley.com
`Joseph P. Meara: jmeara@foley.com
`James P. McParland: jmcparland@foley.com
`Tyler C. Liu: TLiu@agpharm@foley.com
`ARG-dymista@foley.com
`
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`321 North Clark Street
`Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60654
`
`
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`Dennies Varughese
`Registration No. 61,868
`Lead Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 14, 2018
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`9355960.1
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
