throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CIPLA LTD.
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00807
`Patent No. 8,168,620 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO LIMIT PETITION UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.71
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop "PATENT BOARD"
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`1
`
`CIP2182
`Argentum Pharmaceuticals v. Cipla Ltd.
`IPR2017-00807
`
`

`

`
`
`
`IPR2017-00807
`
`Stipulation to Limit Petition
`
`Pursuant 37 C.F.R. § 42.71 and an email communication authorizing this
`
`stipulation, Petitioner Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC and Patent Owner Cipla
`
`Ltd. hereby provide notice of the following:
`
`WHEREAS the Petition (Paper 1) presented three grounds challenging the
`
`patentability of U.S. Patent No. 8,168,620: (1) Ground 1 alleging unpatentability of
`
`claims 1 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over Segal; (2) Ground 2 alleging
`
`unpatentability of claims 1, 4-6, 24-26, and 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Hettche,
`
`Phillipps, and Segal; and (3) Ground 3 alleging unpatentability of claims 42-44
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Hettche, Phillipps, Segal, and Flonase Label;
`
`WHEREAS the Board’s Decision (Paper 11) instituted review on Grounds 2
`
`and 3;
`
`WHEREAS the Board modified the Institution Decision (Paper 51) to
`
`institute “review of all challenged claims and all grounds presented in the
`
`Petition;”
`
`NOW THEREFORE, Petitioner and Patent Owner have agreed and stipulate,
`
`as follows:
`
`1. Petitioner and Patent Owner stipulate to dismiss Ground 1 presented in the
`
`Petition from this proceeding and to limit the Petition pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.71 to Grounds 2 and 3 only;
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`2
`
`CIP2182
`Argentum Pharmaceuticals v. Cipla Ltd.
`IPR2017-00807
`
`

`

`
`
`
`IPR2017-00807
`
`Stipulation to Limit Petition
`
`2. Petitioner and Patent Owner stipulate that this agreement shall not operate
`
`
`
`as a waiver or have any estoppel effect;
`
`3. Petitioner and Patent Owner stipulate that the sole intent of this agreement
`
`is to return this proceeding to the status quo before Paper 51 instituting review on
`
`all grounds presented in the Petition;
`
`4. Petitioner and Patent Owner stipulate that no additional briefing or
`
`evidence will be submitted concerning Ground 1, that Ground 1 will not be
`
`addressed at the upcoming oral hearing scheduled for May 16, 2018, and that the
`
`Board need not address Ground 1 in its final written decision.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 11, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 11, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/Michael Houston/
`Michael R. Houston
`Reg. No. 58,486
`Lead Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/Dennies Varughese/
`Dennies Varughese
`Registration No. 61,868
`Lead Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`- 2 -
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket