throbber
2/13/2018
`
`Failings exposed at India’s drug regulator : Nature News & Comment
`
`NATURE | NEWS
`Failings exposed at India’s drug regulator
`Inadequate testing and insufficient staffing plague the granting of pharmaceutical licences.
`
`Gayathri Vaidyanathan
`
`18 May 2012
`
`India's drug-regulatory system is failing in its job, according to a
`report from an Indian parliamentary committee. The report found
`evidence that pharmaceutical companies exploit loopholes in
`Indian law and sometimes collude with the drug-regulatory
`authority to get licences for their products without adequate tests
`being done.
`
`The performance of the Central Drugs Standard Control
`Organization (CDSCO), based in New Delhi, was scrutinized by
`the Committee on Health and Family Welfare for a report
`presented in parliament earlier this month. Despite the CDSCO
`being India’s equivalent of the US Food and Drug
`Administration, the committee’s report revealed that it is understaffed and has insufficient resources to carry out
`its duties.
`
`India's drug regulator has been accused of
`colluding with pharmaceutical companies to
`approve drugs without adequate testing.
`
`The report also highlights an apparent conflict of interest, which it suggests is at the heart of many of the
`CDSCO’s problems: the agency’s mandate is to “meet the aspirations … demands and requirements of the
`pharmaceutical industry”. The report suggests that this has led to “skewed priorities and perceptions” at the
`agency.
`
`As part of its analysis, the parliamentary committee reviewed the approval process for 42 randomly selected
`drugs, most of which were awarded licences between 2004 and 2010. Documentation for three of the drugs —
`which the report describes as “controversial” because they are not licensed for use in most Western nations —
`was missing, and 11 of the remaining 39 had been licensed apparently without undergoing phase III clinical trials.
`
`Drugs approved for use in other countries still have to undergo a phase III trial in India before they are approved
`because a patient’s response to the treatment can be affected by their ethnic background. For example, the
`cholesterol-lowering drug rosuvastatin is effective in Asian patients at half the dose needed in Western patients1.
`The only time this requirement can be waived is in an emergency — such as the public health threat posed by
`H5N1 avian influenza. But the report found that such emergency exceptions have been granted by the CDSCO
`for an average of one drug every month between 2008 and 2010.
`
`Expert opinion
`
`https://www.nature.com/news/failings-exposed-at-india-s-drug-regulator-1.10668
`
`Exhibit 1107
`IPR2017-00807
`ARGENTUM
`
`1/3
`
`000001
`
`

`

`Failings exposed at India’s drug regulator : Nature News & Comment
`2/13/2018
`The committee’s report also raises concerns about the way in which licences were approved for the drugs it
`reviewed that bypassed clinical trials. The CDSCO sometimes granted exemptions without consulting experts,
`and at other times, the agency asked pharmaceutical companies to submit letters from doctors who vouched for
`the drugs. In some cases, the companies were allowed to choose these experts, who then provided letters that
`appeared to be word-for-word copies of each other.
`
`“There is a nexus between the drug companies and the so-called experts, and the Drug Controller General of
`India,” says Chandra Gulhati, editor of drug-reference guide the Monthly Index of Medical Specialities India. “If
`the opinion of three experts is sought, then you’d expect at least the language of the three letters to be different
`from each other.”
`
`Gyanendra Nath Singh, the Drug Controller General of India, who heads the CDSCO, did not respond to Nature’s
`request for comment.
`
`Blood-pressure drug ambrisentan, made by GlaxoSmithKline, was one of those approved by the CDSCO without
`clinical trials. The report does not mention whether the agency sought expert opinion on the drug before granting
`an exemption. The company notes that the drug has been approved in 44 countries and that those approvals
`were based on phase III trials in 400 patients of multiple ethnicities.
`
`Two of the drugs approved without trials were made by Novartis, though the company was not one of those that
`submitted suspicious expert opinion letters. It says that its regulatory approvals are transparent, and were
`granted under rules that “allow concessions for drugs that treat a rare disease which is life threatening and
`debilitating”.
`
`Indian drug company Cipla also had two drugs that were approved without trials or expert opinion. The company
`denies any collusion with the CDSCO, saying that phase III trials are not mandatory for some drugs.
`
`The committee was also scathing about the CDSCO’s approval of 13 of the 42 drugs reviewed that are not
`licensed for use in most developed countries. The majority of these treatments were domestically manufactured
`tablets containing a mixture of two or more compounds, called fixed dose combinations (FDCs). These are
`supposed to make patients more likely to take their medication by reducing the complexity of their treatment.
`
`But FDCs can cause problems: some that mix antibiotics can lead to the evolution of bacterial resistance, notes
`Gulhati. “If these combinations are valid and wonderful, why would Western countries not adopt them?” he asks.
`
`Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10668
`
`References
`
`1. Yang, J. et al. Acta Pharmacol. Sinica. 32, 116–125 (2011).
`
`Article ISI ChemPort
`
`https://www.nature.com/news/failings-exposed-at-india-s-drug-regulator-1.10668
`
`2/3
`
`000002
`
`

`

`2/13/2018
`Related stories and links
`
`Failings exposed at India’s drug regulator : Nature News & Comment
`
`From nature.com
`Pakistani drug regulator 'destined to be a failure'
`04 April 2012
`International groups move to criminalize fake drugs
`02 March 2012
`Fines expose failings in policing of Indian drug trials
`19 January 2012
`
`From elsewhere
`Parliamentary report on CDSCO
`Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation
`
`For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines.
`You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability
`to recommend comments to other users.
`
`Commenting is currently unavailable.
`
`See other News & Comment articles from Nature
`
`Nature
`
`ISSN 0028-0836
`
`EISSN 1476-4687
`
`© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All Rights Reserved.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Gravity signalsHuge haul of rareHealth agencyChina to roll back‘Alien’ DNA makesRise in malariaUnited KingdomEuropean UnionHow an underwaterMaths and murals:Zimbabwe’sNobel laureatesAI-controlled brainLightning makesBlack academicsHungary rewardsOnline softwareHow alkali flies stayUK governmentEuropean
`partner of AGORA, HINARI, OARE, INASP, CrossRef and COUNTER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`could speedily warnpterosaur eggsreveals scourge ofregulations forproteins in livingcases sparks fearsrelies on science tonations vote tosensor network isLeiden’s wallresearchers hopedemand release ofimplants for moodnew isotopessoon to outnumberhighly citedspots genetic errorsdryannouncesMedicines Agency
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of big quakes andexcitesfake drugs intraditional medicinecells for the firstof a resurgencerevive flaggingkeep usingtracking Argentina'sformulaepolitical change willIranian scholardisorders tested inwhite researchersscientists within cancer papersresearch-spendingto move to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`save livespalaeontologistsdeveloping worlddespite safetytimeeconomycontroversiallost submarinerevitalize sciencefacing deathpeoplein South Africabonus grantshike ahead ofAmsterdam
`
`
`
`concernsweedkillersentencebudget
`glyphosate
`
`https://www.nature.com/news/failings-exposed-at-india-s-drug-regulator-1.10668
`
`3/3
`
`000003
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket