throbber
Development of fluticasone propionate and
`comparison with other inhaled corticosteroids
`
`Malcolm Johnson, PhD Middlesex, United Kingdom
`
`Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a trifluorinated glucocorticoid
`based on the androstane nucleus. It was selected for develop-
`ment from structure-activity relationships (topical anti-in-
`flammatory, cutaneous vasoconstriction, and hypothalamic-
`pituitary-adrenal axis suppression) of a series of 17b-
`carbothioates. FP is 3-, 300-, and 1000-fold more lipophilic
`than beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide, and triam-
`cinolone acetonide, respectively. FP has an absolute affinity
`(KD) for the glucocorticoid receptor of 0.5 nmol/L and a rela-
`tive receptor affinity 1.5-fold higher than beclomethasone-17-
`monopropionate (17-BMP) and mometasone furoate, 3-fold
`higher than budesonide, and 20-fold higher than flunisolide
`and triamcinolone acetonide. The rate of association of FP
`with the receptor is faster and the rate of dissociation slower
`than other corticosteroids. The resulting half-life of the FP
`active steroid-receptor complex is >10 hours, compared with
`approximately 5, 7.5, and 4 hours for budesonide, 17-BMP,
`and triamcinolone acetonide, respectively. FP has high selec-
`tivity for the glucocorticoid receptor, with little or no activity
`at other steroid receptors. FP is more potent than be-
`clomethasone dipropionate, budesonide, triamcinolone ace-
`tonide, and mometasone furoate in inhibiting human T-cell
`migration and proliferation, inhibiting CD41 T-cell cytokine
`and basophil histamine release, attenuating adhesion mole-
`cule expression, stimulating inflammatory cell apoptosis, and
`inducing cellular antiprotease release. In asthma patients,
`FP decreases the number of CD31, CD41, CD81, and
`CD251 T cells, mast cells, and eosinophils in bronchial bi-
`opsies, in addition to suppressing CD1a-dendritic and IgE1
`cells and HLA-DR. FP, therefore, has a good pharmacologic
`profile for a topical steroid with increased intrinsic glucocor-
`ticoid potency and potent anti-inflammatory activity.
`(J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;101:S434-9.)
`
`Key words: Fluticasone propionate, inhaled corticosteroids,
`structure-activity relationships, asthma
`
`To exert anti-inflammatory activity, a corticosteroid
`molecule must penetrate the cellular membrane and
`demonstrate affinity for the steroid binding site on the
`glucocorticoid receptor (GR), leading to activation of
`the receptor.1 Dimerization of the active steroid-recep-
`tor complex occurs, and this can then enter the nucleus,
`bind to glucocorticoid-responsive elements on a target
`gene, influence gene transcription, and either inhibit
`proinflammatory or potentiate endogenous anti-inflam-
`matory mechanisms. Alternatively, a direct interaction
`
`From International Medical Affairs, Respiratory, Glaxo Wellcome Re-
`search and Development, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
`Reprint requests: Malcolm Johnson, PhD, International Medical Affairs,
`Respiratory, Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Stockley
`Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK, UB11 1BT.
`Copyright © 1998 by Mosby, Inc.
`0091-6749/98 $5.00 1 0 1/0/86611
`
`S434
`
`Abbreviations used
`BDP:
`Beclomethasone dipropionate
`17-BMP:
`Beclomethasone-17-monopropionate
`FP:
`Fluticasone propionate
`GR: Glucocorticoid receptor
`GRE: Glucocorticoid-responsive element
`RBA: Relative receptor binding affinity
`
`of the GR complex with transcription factors may also
`be an important determinant of steroid action and a key
`mechanism by which glucocorticoids exert some anti-
`inflammatory activity.1
`The early development of corticosteroids based on the
`structure of cortisol focused on increasing topical po-
`tency and improving glucocorticoid selectivity. The first
`structure-activity studies attempted to find compounds
`with greater anti-inflammatory activity. This was
`achieved either by the insertion of an additional double
`bond at the 1,2 position in the steroid nucleus; by the
`introduction of 6a-fluoro, 6a-methyl, or 9a-fluoro sub-
`stituents; or by a combination of these changes (Fig. 1).
`Although anti-inflammatory potency was potentiated,
`mineralocorticoid activity was increased to an even
`greater extent.2 This effect was counteracted by further
`substitutions with a-hydroxyl, a-methyl, or b-methyl at
`the 16 position, for example, in dexamethasone (Fig. 1).
`A novel finding was that an ester function at the 16a,
`17a, or 21a hydroxyl group was preferred, and this gave
`rise to betamethasone 17-valerate, triamcinolone 16,17-
`acetonide,
`and beclomethasone-17,21-dipropionate.2
`These compounds have proved to be of value in the
`treatment of the inflammatory component of bronchial
`asthma and rhinitis and have shown little detectable
`systemic activity when delivered by the topical route.
`However, concern that long-term therapy may result in a
`wide range of unacceptable systemic side effects such as
`adrenal suppression, bone fracture, osteoporosis, and
`inhibition of growth in children highlighted the need for
`steroids with a better therapeutic index.
`
`DEVELOPMENT OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
`The development of fluticasone propionate was an
`attempt to produce a potent corticosteroid that exhib-
`ited improved airway selectivity (Table I) compared with
`earlier compounds. Lipophilicity was identified as an
`important physicochemical property for increased up-
`take and retention in lung tissue, resulting in enhanced
`lung-systemic distribution and greater affinity for the
`Exhibit 1018
`IPR2017-00807
`ARGENTUM
`
`000001
`
`

`

`J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
`VOLUME 101, NUMBER 4, PART 2
`
`Johnson S435
`
`FIG. 1. Structural modifications of cortisol that produced the corticosteroids: dexamethasone, triamcinolone
`acetonide, beclomethasone dipropionate, and fluticasone propionate.
`
`GR. The androstane nucleus, which is highly lipophilic,
`was therefore selected as the basis of the chemical
`program.3 Topical activity was assessed by inhibition of
`croton oil–induced inflammation of the ear in a mouse
`
`model4 and inhibitory activity at
`the hypothalamic-
`pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis assessed by measuring re-
`ductions in circulating corticosteroids in response to
`ether stress.5 The vasoconstriction/skin blanching assay6
`
`000002
`
`

`

`S436 Johnson
`
`J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
`APRIL 1998
`
`TABLE I. Criteria for improved airway selectivity
`of corticosteroids
`
`Pharmacodynamics
`c High glucocorticoid receptor affinity
`c Optimal glucocorticoid receptor kinetics
`c High intrinsic steroid potency/high topical anti-inflamma-
`tory activity
`c High glucocorticoid receptor specificity
`Pharmacokinetics
`c Low oral bioavailability
`c Increased uptake/retention in lung tissue
`c Rapid systemic clearance
`c Extrapulmonary metabolism to inactive metabolite(s)
`c High lung:systemic distribution ratio
`
`iting HPA axis function resulted from FP undergoing
`complete first-pass metabolism in the liver to the inac-
`tive 17b-carboxylic acid. X-ray crystallography has
`shown that the carbonyl of the 17b-substituent lies below
`the plane of the ring rather than above it, which is
`observed for other anti-inflammatory steroids.7 This
`unusual shape,
`in which the carbothioate ester has
`increased accessibility, may explain why FP readily un-
`dergoes enzymatic hydrolysis. FP therefore has a high
`calculated therapeutic index (anti-inflammatory poten-
`cy/HPA inhibitory potency) of 91, compared with 0.4
`and 1.0 for BDP and fluocinolone acetonide, respective-
`ly.8
`FP is 3 and 300 times more lipophilic than BDP and
`respectively, and .1000-fold more li-
`budesonide,
`pophilic than either flunisolide or triamcinolone ace-
`tonide.9 This degree of lipophilicity gives FP increased
`deposition in lung tissue and a slower release from the
`lung lipid compartment. In human lung fragments and
`nasal tissue in vitro, uptake and retention of corticoste-
`roids is in the rank order FP . BDP . 17-BMP .
`budesonide . flunisolide . hydrocortisone.10, 11 In pa-
`tients with asthma, after inhalation of a 1 mg dose, FP
`exhibits a lung:systemic distribution ratio of 70 to 100,12
`compared with previous reports of 7 to 10 for budes-
`onide.13
`
`RECEPTOR PHARMACOLOGY
`FP has a high affinity for the human lung GR (0.5
`nmol/L),14 which is 1.5-fold higher than 17-BMP and
`mometasone furoate, 3-fold higher than budesonide,
`and 10-fold higher than triamcinolone acetonide and
`flunisolide (Table III). Unlike budesonide, which is a
`racemic mixture of 22R and 22S enantiomers, FP does
`not have a chiral center and therefore the measured
`affinity represents the affinity of the molecule and not
`the contribution of the individual enantiomers. In con-
`trast to 17-BMP, the metabolite of BDP that has a
`relative receptor binding affinity (RBA) 5-fold higher
`than the parent molecule, budesonide, with an RBA of
`7.8, undergoes a marked reduction in activity when
`metabolized to either 6-hydroxy-budesonide (RBA 5
`0.06) or 16-a-hydroxy-prednisolone (RBA 5 0.03). The
`
`FIG. 2. Kinetics of (A) association and (B) dissociation of methyl-
`prednisolone, triamcinolone acetonide, budesonide, and flutica-
`sone propionate with the glucocorticoid receptor in human lung
`tissue. Data from references 10 and 14.
`
`was then used to confirm activity in human beings and to
`rank compounds in order of anti-inflammatory potency.
`The androstane 17b-carboxylates, which lack the nor-
`mal two-carbon side-chain of anti-inflammatory cortico-
`steroids at the 17 position, were of particular interest.3
`The 17a-hydroxyl,17b-carboxylic acid was without activ-
`ity in the vasoconstriction assay, with esterification being
`necessary for topical activity. Enzymatic hydrolysis of
`either ester function, which can occur in vivo, would
`therefore lead to inactive metabolites. The 17b-carbox-
`ylate series was superseded by the corresponding 17b-
`carbothioates.3 Fluoromethyl analogues were, in gen-
`eral, more active than the corresponding chloromethyl
`compounds, with the 17-propionate being preferred over
`the acetate or butyrate; in addition, the presence of an
`a-CH3 at position 16 reduced HPA axis–suppressing
`activity (Table II). The most active compound in the
`anti-inflammatory and vasoconstriction tests was the
`6a,9a-difluoro, 17a-propionyl, 17b-carbothioate (fluti-
`casone propionate), which was approximately 2-fold and
`10-fold more potent than BDP and fluocinolone ace-
`tonide, respectively (Table II). Its low activity in inhib-
`
`000003
`
`

`

`J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
`VOLUME 101, NUMBER 4, PART 2
`
`Johnson S437
`
`TABLE II. Structure-activity of halomethyl-androstane-17b-carbothioate analogues
`
`Z
`
`F
`F
`F
`F§
`F
`F
`F
`
`Y
`
`H
`H
`F
`F
`F
`F
`F
`
`X
`
`CI
`F
`CI
`F
`F
`F
`F
`
`R
`
`C2H5
`C2H5
`C2H5
`C2H5
`CH3
`C3H7
`C2H5
`
`16
`
`H
`H
`aCH3
`aCH3
`aCH3
`aCH3
`bCH3
`
`Topical anti-
`inflammatory
`activity*
`
`HPA
`suppression†
`
`Cutaneous
`vasoconstriction‡
`
`20
`63
`56
`113
`76
`55
`197
`
`100
`149
`0.04
`1.0
`2.9
`0.7
`.100
`
`916
`1984
`124
`945
`392
`299
`1048
`
`Results are expressed relative to fluocinolone acetonide as standard (100). Data from Reference 3.
`*Assessed with the croton oil ear assay in mice.4
`†Assessed with the ether stress assay in rodents.5
`‡Assessed with the skin blanching test in human volunteers.6
`§Structure of fluticasone propionate.
`
`TABLE III. Comparison of corticosteroid-
`glucocorticoid receptor affinity in human lung and
`potency in the cutaneous vasoconstriction test
`
`Corticosteroid
`
`Fluocinolone acetonide
`Beclomethasone-17-
`monopropionate
`Triamcinolone acetonide
`Flunisolide
`Mometasone furoate
`Budesonide
`Fluticasone propionate
`
`Relative
`glucocorticoid
`receptor
`affinity*
`
`Relative
`vasoconstrictor
`activity†
`
`1.0
`3.3
`
`0.5
`0.45
`3.3
`2.5
`5.0
`
`1.0
`2.0
`
`0.4
`0.5
`3.0
`1.5
`5.0
`
`TABLE IV. Corticosteroid-induced inhibition of
`human inflammatory cells
`
`IC50 (nmol/L)
`
`T-cell
`IL-5
`release*
`
`T-cell
`proliferation†
`
`Basophil
`histamine
`release‡
`
`Eosinophil
`apoptosis§
`
`7.7
`
`9.8
`
`1.7
`0.3
`
`0.2
`
`10.0
`
`1.0
`
`0.2
`. . .
`
`0.05
`
`1.0
`
`20.0
`
`0.6
`0.3
`
`0.03
`
`138.7
`
`23.8
`
`8.5
`. . .
`
`1.7
`
`Corticosteroid
`
`Beclomethasone
`dipropionate
`Triamcinolone
`acetonide
`Budesonide
`Mometasone
`furoate
`Fluticasone pro-
`pionate
`
`Activities are quoted relative to fluocinolone acetonide as standard (1.0).
`*Data from Reference 14.
`†Data from Reference 6.
`
`*Data from Reference 19.
`†Data from Reference 18.
`‡Data from Reference 20.
`§Data from Reference 21.
`
`17b-carboxylic acid metabolite of FP has negligible
`pharmacologic activity, with an RBA ,0.01 at the GR.9
`The rate of association of steroid with the cytosolic GR
`is fastest for FP, followed by budesonide, triamcinolone
`acetonide, and methyl prednisolone (Fig. 2). In contrast,
`the rate of dissociation of FP from the receptor complex
`is slower than that of budesonide, triamcinolone ace-
`tonide, dexamethasone, and methyl prednisolone (Fig.
`2). These differences in GR kinetics for FP result in
`differences in the stability of the steroid-receptor com-
`plex, which mediates the biologic and therapeutic activ-
`ity of glucocorticoids.1 The half-life of the steroid-
`receptor complex for FP is .10 hours, compared with
`approximately 3.5, 4.0, 5.0, and 7.5 hours for flunisolide,
`triamcinolone acetonide, budesonide, and 17-BMP, re-
`spectively.9 FP is highly selective for the GR with ,0.001
`of the relative potency at human androgen, estrogen,
`and mineralocorticoid receptors.15 The selectivity ratio
`of FP for the GR over the progestagen receptor is 1430,
`compared with 267 and 237 for 17-BMP and budes-
`onide, respectively.
`
`ANTI-INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY
`The steroid receptor profile of FP imparts a high
`topical anti-inflammatory activity. The active FP-GR
`5 3
`complex binds to the GRE on target genes (EC50
`nmol/L) or interacts directly with activating protein-1
`and/or nuclear factor-kB transcription factors (EC50
`range 0.01 to 0.1 nmol/L) at significantly lower concen-
`trations than either dexamethasone or budesonide.16
`This has a good correlation with the respective potency
`of FP in inhibiting GRE-dependent cytokine (IL-6, IL-8)
`synthesis (IC50 range 5 to 10 nmol/L) and non–GRE-
`dependent cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-a
`(TNFa) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating
`factor (IC50 range 0.01 to 0.1 nmol/L).
`There is also a good correlation between the relative
`affinity of these corticosteroids for the GR and their
`relative potency in a number of intact inflammatory cell
`systems (Table IV). For example, FP is more potent than
`dexamethasone, BDP, and budesonide in inhibiting hu-
`man T-cell migration17 and proliferation,18 with IC50
`
`000004
`
`

`

`S438 Johnson
`
`J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
`APRIL 1998
`
`values of 0.3, 5.9, 2.0, and 0.8 nmol/L. Similarly, anti–
`CD3/CD28-induced IL-5 and IL-4 secretion from CD41
`T cells is inhibited by corticosteroids, with a rank
`order of potency of FP . mometasone furoate .
`budesonide . BDP . triamcinolone acetonide.19 FP
`inhibits anti–IgE-stimulated histamine release from
`human basophils with an IC50 of 0.03 nmol/L, com-
`pared with 0.3, 0.6, 1, and 20 nmol/L for mometasone
`furoate, budesonide, BDP, and triamcinolone ace-
`tonide, respectively.20 Corticosteroids, in the presence
`of IL-5, induce concentration-dependent apoptosis of
`5 1.7 nmol/L) being 5
`eosinophils, with FP (EC50
`times more potent
`than budesonide and approxi-
`mately 10 times more potent
`than triamcinolone
`acetonide and flunisolide.21 FP is also potent
`in
`inhibiting cytokine-induced adhesion molecule ex-
`pression. At 1 nmol/L, FP inhibits TNFa-stimulated
`E-selectin in human endothelial cells,22 whereas
`8-fold higher concentrations of budesonide are re-
`quired for the same effect. At a concentration of 100
`nmol/L, FP is more effective than budesonide or
`triamcinolone acetonide in inhibiting intracellular ad-
`hesion molecule-1 expression in airway epithelial
`cells.23 Finally, Abbin ante-Nissen et al.24 have shown
`that corticosteroids induce the synthesis of the anti-
`protease,
`secretory
`leukocyte protease
`inhibitor
`(SLPI), in human airway epithelial cells. FP is the
`most potent steroid in inducing SLPI, with an EC50 of
`0.1 nmol/L compared with 1, 5, and 2 nmol/L for
`triamcinolone acetonide, methylprednisolone, and
`dexamethasone, respectively.
`The rank order of affinity of corticosteroids at the GR
`and their anti-inflammatory potency in vivo are similar.
`In the McKenzie test, in which the cutaneous vasocon-
`strictor and skin blanching response is used to rank
`anti-inflammatory potency of topical corticosteroids,6
`FP is 1.5-, 2.5-, and 3-fold more potent than 17-BMP,
`mometasone furoate, and budesonide, respectively, and
`10-fold more potent than triamcinolone acetonide and
`flunisolide (Table III). This is in agreement with Dahl-
`berg et al.,25 who had previously reported that the RBA
`predicts relative potency for inhibition of edema.
`
`CLINICAL STUDIES
`In patients with asthma, FP treatment (1 mg twice
`daily for 2 months) significantly reduced the numbers of
`mast cells (by 80.2%), eosinophils (by 93.6%), and T
`cells (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25; mean reduction of 86.5%)
`in bronchial biopsy specimens.26 Similarly, the presence
`of dendritic (CD1a), IgE1, and HLA-DR1 cells in the
`lamina propria was decreased after FP 1 mg daily for 3
`months,27 suggesting attenuation of antigen recognition,
`processing, and presentation. Finally, FP (500 mg twice
`daily for 8 weeks) results in a marked decrease in the
`bronchoalveolar lavage levels of metalloprotease and an
`increase in the concentration of the endogenous tissue
`inhibitor of metalloproteases (TIMPS),28 both of which
`have been implicated in matrix protein deposition and
`basement membrane thickening. FP, therefore, has good
`
`activity against the chronic inflammatory component of
`bronchial asthma and may attenuate the degree of
`airway remodeling.
`The development of FP has resulted in a corticoste-
`roid molecule with increased intrinsic glucocorticoid
`potency and potent anti-inflammatory activity, coupled
`with improved airway selectivity.29 FP is of considerable
`clinical
`importance in the treatment of asthma and
`rhinitis.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Anti-inflammatory actions of steroids:
`molecular mechanism. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1993;14:436-41.
`2. Phillipps GH. Locally active corticosteroids: structure-activity rela-
`tionships. In: Wilson L, Markes R, editor. Mechanisms of topical
`corticosteroid activity. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1976. p. 1-18.
`3. Phillipps GH, Bailey EJ, Bain BM, Borella RA, Buckton JB, Clark
`JC, et al. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships in a series of
`anti-inflammatory corticosteroid analogues, halomethyl androstane-
`17b-carbothiates and 17b-carboselenoates. J Med Chem 1994;37:
`3717-29.
`4. Tonelli G, Thibault L, Ringler I. A bio-assay for the concomitant
`assessment of the antiphlogistic and thymolytic activities of topically
`applied corticoids. Endocrinology 1965;77:625-34.
`5. Zenker N, Bernstein DE. The estimation of small amounts of
`corticosterone in rat plasma. J Biol Chem 1958;231:695-701.
`6. McKenzie AW. Percutaneous absorption of steroids. Arch Dermatol
`1962;86:611-4.
`7. Weeks CM, Duax WL, Wolff ME. A comparison of the molecular
`structures of six corticosteroids. J Am Chem Soc 1973;95:2865-8.
`8. Phillipps GH. Structure-activity relationships of topically active
`steroids: the selection of fluticasone propionate. Respir Med 1990;
`84(suppl):19-23.
`9. Johnson M. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of inhaled
`glucocorticoids. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;97:169-76.
`10. Ho¨gger P, Rawert L, Rohdewald P. Dissolution tissue binding and
`kinetics of receptor binding of inhaled glucocorticoids. Eur Respir J
`1993;6:584s.
`11. Ho¨gger P, Bonsmann U, Rohdewald P. Efflux of glucocorticoids
`from human lung tissue to human plasma in vitro. Eur Respir J
`1994;7:382s.
`12. Ho¨gger P, Esmailpour N, Rabe K, Heitmann U, Nakashima N,
`Rhodewald P. Distribution of inhaled fluticasone propionate be-
`tween lung tissue and blood plasma in vivo. Eur Respir J 1995;8:
`303S.
`13. Van den Bosch JMM, Westermann CJJ, Aumann J, Edsbacker S,
`To¨nneffon M, Selrous O. Relationship between lung tissue and
`blood plasma concentrations of inhaled budesonide. Biopharm Drug
`Dispos 1993;14:455-9.
`14. Ho¨gger P, Rohdewald P. Binding kinetics of fluticasone propionate
`to the human glucocorticoid receptor. Steroids 1994;59:597-602.
`15. Harding SM. The human pharmacology of fluticasone propionate.
`Respir Med 1990;84(suppl):25-9.
`16. Adcock IM, Barnes PJ. Ligand-induced differentiation of glucocor-
`ticoid receptor transrepression and transactivation. In: Acute and
`chronic inflammation in the respiratory tract, International Respi-
`ratory Forum. Reading UK: Colwood Publications; 1996. p. 25.
`17. Cruikshank W, Masterson J, Center D. Effects of fluticasone propi-
`onate on random and stimulated T cell migration. In: Acute and
`chronic inflammation in the respiratory tract, International Respi-
`ratory Forum. Reading UK: Colwood Publications; 1996. p. 19.
`18. English AF, Neate MS, Quint DJ, Sareen M. Biological activities of
`some corticosteroids used in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
`1994;149:A212.
`19. Umland SP, Nahrebne MS, Razac S, Billah MM, Egan RW. Effects
`of mometasone furoate and other glucocorticoids on cytokine pro-
`duction from cultured peripheral blood CD41 T cells. J Allergy Clin
`Immunol 1996;97:423.
`
`000005
`
`

`

`J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
`VOLUME 101, NUMBER 4, PART 2
`
`Johnson S439
`
`20. Bickel CA, Stellato C, Schleimer RP. Comparison of the effect of
`inhaled glucocorticoids on human basophil histamine release and
`eosinophil viability. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;99:1632.
`21. Kita H, Hagen JB, Gleich GJ. Fluticasone propionate is the most
`potent glucocorticoid in the induction of apoptosis of eosinophils. In:
`Acute and chronic inflammation in the respiratory tract, Interna-
`tional Respiratory Forum. Reading UK: Colwood Publications;
`1996. p. 17.
`22. Johnson M. Anti-inflammatory properties of fluticasone propionate.
`Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1995;107:439-40.
`23. Adler KB, Krunkosky TA, Fischer BM. Effects of tumour necrosis
`factor-alpha on airway epithelial cells in vitro. In: Acute and chronic
`inflammation in the respiratory tract, International Respiratory
`Forum. Reading UK: Colwood Publications; 1996. p. 18.
`24. Abbinante-Nissen JM, Simpson LG, Leikauf GD. Corticosteroids
`increase secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor transcript levels in
`airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:A869.
`25. Dahlberg E, Thale´n A, Brattsand R, Gustafsson JA, Johansson U,
`Ro¨mpke K. Correlation between chemical structure, receptor
`
`binding, and biological activity of some novel, highly active, 16a,
`17a-acetyl-substituted glucocorticoids. Mol Pharmacol 1983;25:
`70-8.
`26. Booth H, Gardiner PV, Ward C, Walls A, Hendrick DJ, Walters
`EH. Effect of fluticasone on airway inflammation as assessed by
`bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Eur Respir J 1993;6(suppl 17):
`584S.
`27. Mo¨ller GM, Overbeek SE, van Helden-Meeuwsen CG, de Jong
`TAW, Mulder PG, Drexloge HA, et al. Glucocorticoid therapy is
`associated with modulation of dendritic cells in bronchial mucosa of
`atopic asthmatic subjects. In: Acute and chronic inflammation in the
`respiratory tract, International Respiratory Forum. Reading UK:
`Colwood Publications; 1996. p. 16.
`28. Warner JA, Shute JK, Howarth PH. Effect of therapy on matrix
`metallo-proteinase (MMP) activity in the broncho-alveolar lavage
`(BAL) of patients with mild asthma. Am J Resp Crit Care Med In
`press.
`29. Derendorf H, Hochhaus G, Mo¨llermann H, Barth J, Krieg M, Jurn
`S, et al. Receptor-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis
`of corticosteroids. J Clin Pharmacol 1993;33:115-23.
`
`000006
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket