throbber
From: J. Christopher Carraway [mailto:chris.carraway@klarquist.com]  
`Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 3:35 PM 
`To: Jamie.Lynn@BakerBotts.com; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>; kayvan@noroozipc.com; asommer@winston.com 
`Cc: MWoods@winston.com; tdunham@winston.com; Lisa.Nguyen@lw.com; william@noroozipc.com; 
`Alan.Billharz@lw.com 
`Subject: RE: IPR2017‐00176, ‐179: Request Under SAS 
`
`Dear Mr. Kellogg, 
`
`Petitioners Hewlett‐Packard Enterprise Co. and HP Enterprise Services, LLC (of IPR2017‐00176 and IPR2017‐00179) 
`consent to the Board’s consideration of the Petitions as proposed below. 
`
`Kind regards, 
`
`Chris Carraway 
`
`From: Jamie.Lynn@BakerBotts.com [mailto:Jamie.Lynn@BakerBotts.com]  
`Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 1:16 PM 
`To: Trials@USPTO.GOV; kayvan@noroozipc.com; asommer@winston.com 
`Cc: MWoods@winston.com; tdunham@winston.com; Lisa.Nguyen@lw.com; william@noroozipc.com; J. Christopher 
`Carraway <chris.carraway@klarquist.com>; Alan.Billharz@lw.com 
`Subject: RE: IPR2017‐00176, ‐179: Request Under SAS 
`
`Dear Mr. Kellogg,
`Petitioner Teradata (of IPR2017‐00806 and IPR2017‐00808) consents to the Board’s consideration of the Petitions
`as proposed below.
`Best regards,
`Jamie
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>  
`Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 2:10 PM 
`To: Kayvan Noroozi <kayvan@noroozipc.com>; EXT Sommer, Andrew <asommer@winston.com> 
`Cc: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>; Woods, Michael <MWoods@winston.com>; EXT Dunham, Tom (Verizon Wireless) 
`<tdunham@winston.com>; Lisa.Nguyen@lw.com; William Rothwell <william@noroozipc.com>; Lynn, Jamie 
`<Jamie.Lynn@BakerBotts.com>; J. Christopher Carraway (chris.carraway@klarquist.com) 
`
`1
`
`

`

`<chris.carraway@klarquist.com>; Alan.Billharz@lw.com 
`Subject: RE: IPR2017‐00176, ‐179: Request Under SAS
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`The Board notes that IPR2017-00176 has been consolidated with IPR2017-00806 and joined with IPR2017-01688, and
`that IPR2017-00179 has been consolidated with IPR2017-00808 and joined with IPR2017-01690. The Board appreciates
`the parties’ non-opposition to the Board’s inclusion in this trial of all grounds raised in the Petitions (including (1)
`Franaszek and Hsu, and (2) Franaszek, Hsu, and Sebastian) without further briefing, notwithstanding their apparent
`dispute as to whether the Petitions adequately set forth separate grounds based on (1) Franaszek and Hsu, and (2)
`Franaszek, Hsu, and Sebastian. The Board notes, however, that even though counsel for the Petitioners in the four joined
`or consolidated proceedings were copied on the parties’ prior emails, these e-mails explicitly referenced only the lead cases
`(IPR2017-00176 and IPR2017-00179), and counsel for Petitioners in the four joined or consolidated proceedings did not
`explicitly confirm that they consent to this approach.
`
`
`In order to ensure that the record is clear, the Board requests that Patent Owner and the Petitioners in the six above-
`referenced proceedings respond to this e-mail to confirm that they consent to the Board considering and ruling on all
`patentability arguments set forth in the Petitions (including the Petitioners’ unpatentability arguments based on (1)
`Franaszek and Hsu, and (2) Franaszek, Hsu, and Sebastian) without further briefing, and without further oral argument.
`
`
`Regards,
`
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`
`
`From: Kayvan Noroozi [mailto:kayvan@noroozipc.com]  
`Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 2:55 PM 
`To: Sommer, Andrew R. <ASommer@winston.com> 
`Cc: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>; Woods, Michael <MWoods@winston.com>; Dunham, Thomas M. 
`<TDunham@winston.com>; Lisa.Nguyen@lw.com; William Rothwell <william@noroozipc.com>; 
`jamie.lynn@bakerbotts.com; J. Christopher Carraway (chris.carraway@klarquist.com) <chris.carraway@klarquist.com>; 
`Alan.Billharz@lw.com 
`Subject: Re: IPR2017‐00176, ‐179: Request Under SAS
`
`
`Your Honors:
`
`
`To clarify, Patent Owner does not believe there is an SAS issue here. The petitions were instituted on all offered
`grounds and all challenged claims. Nonetheless, Petitioner correctly states that Patent Owner does not object to
`the Board addressing, in its final written decision, (1) Franaszek and Hsu; and (2) Franaszek, Hsu, and
`Sebastian.
`
`
`Best
`Kayvan Noroozi
`
`
`Kayvan B. Noroozi
`Noroozi PC
`1299 Ocean Ave., Suite 450
`Santa Monica, CA 90401
`(310) 975-7074
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Sommer, Andrew R. <ASommer@winston.com> wrote:
`
`Your Honors:
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner in the above-referenced proceedings requests that the Board consider the two grounds that it
`identified in the Petition in these matters, namely: (1) Franaszek and Hsu, and (2) Franaszek, Hsu, and
`Sebastian. Petitioner submits that the panel should evaluate the challenges set forth in the petition. Petitioner
`has conferred with Patent Owner, who does not object to this approach. The parties to these proceedings agree
`that all issues have been fully briefed and can be evaluated by the panel without further briefing unless the
`panel believes further briefing is needed.
`
`
`
`
`
`Best regards,
`
`
`
`
`
`Andrew R. Sommer
`
`Reg. No. 53,932
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Andrew R. Sommer
`Partner
`Winston & Strawn LLP
`1700 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006-3817
`D: +1 (202) 282-5896
`F: +1 (202) 282-5100
`Bio | VCard | Email | www.winston.com
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of
`this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice
`contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and
`regulations.
`

`
`Confidentiality Notice:
`
`The information contained in this email and any attachments is intended only for the recipient[s] listed above and may be privileged
`and confidential. Any dissemination, copying, or use of or reliance upon such information by or to anyone other than the recipient[s]
`listed above is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately at the email address
`above and destroy any and all copies of this message.
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket