throbber
US008787603B2
`
`US 8,787,603 B2
`(10) Patent No.:
`a2) United States Patent
`Fichtl et al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`
`(54) METHOD FOR OPERATING A HEARING
`DEVICE AS WELL AS A HEARING DEVICE
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Elmar Fichtl, Oetwil am See (CH);
`Michael Boretzki, Ruti (CH)
`
`2006/0222194 A1* 10/2006 Bramslow et al. «0... 381/314
`2007/0147624 Al
`6/2007 Fischer
`2007/0203726 Al
`8/2007 Thompson
`9
`BUOSUNGZ208 Al
`32008! Bachisretal:
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`(73) Assignee: Phonak AG, Stafa (CH)
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`5/2002
`1208723 Bl
`EP
`4/2001
`01/26419 Al
`WO
`4/2009
`2009-049672 Al
`WO
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`12/2009
`2009/0144056 Al
`WO
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`US.C. 154(b)
`by 0 days.
`
`
`(6) byOdays OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`13/517,154
`(21) Appl. No.:
`International Search Report for PCT/EP2009/067716 dated Oct. 13,
`Z
`2010.
`
`(2) PET Riled:=Dee222D? Written Opinion for PCT/EP2009/0677 16 dated Oct. 13, 2010.
`(86) PCT No.:
`PCT/EP2009/067716
`* cited by examiner
`§ 371 (©)(),
`Jun. 19, 2012
`(2), (4) Date:
`PCT Pub. No.: WO2010/031880
`mee
`PCT Pub. Date: Mar. 25, 2010
`Prior Publication Data
`US 2013/0114836 Al
`May9, 2013
`;
`
`15 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HIMPP 1003
`
`87)
`(87)
`
`(65)
`
`(2006.01)
`
`(51)
`
`(56)
`
`Int. Cl.
`HOAR 25/00
`(52) U.S.C.
`USPC.
` ssssesemenasenreorscenmanennnenneravenvens 381/314
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`CPC
`HOAR 25/70: HO4R 25/30
`USPCuo381/314, 323 3.1. 60 31 2 328. 330
`See a
`lication file for com ete ‘search histo

`PP
`P
`ry:
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2005/0036637 Al
`2005/0129262 Al
`2006/0198530 Al*
`
`2/2005 Janssen
`6/2005 Dillon etal.
`9/2006 Fischer et al. oe 38 1/60
`
`Primary Examiner — Brian Ensey
`Assistant Examiner — Norman Yu
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Pearne & Gordon LLP
`
`bsUReCT
`67)
`Acclimatization ofa hearing device userto a hearing device is
`made moreacceptable by automatic acclimatization manage-
`ment. The intensity of the hearing device is increased in the
`long term, e.g. during several months. The speedofthe inten-
`sity increase depends onuserinputs. A user controls an audio
`processing parameter (APP), such as volume, with a user
`control. Each time the user switches the hearing device off
`and on again, the power-on value (POV)ofthe audio process-
`ing parameter (APP) is changed. The amount of the change
`depends on whichsettings for the audio processing parameter
`(APP)have been selected by the hearing device user and how
`long the settings have been active. An initial power-on value
`(POV) and a target power-on value (tPOV), which is to be
`reached at the end (H)of the acclimatization phase, may be
`programmedby an audiologist.
`
`HIMPP 1003
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`US8,787,603 B2
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`US8,787,603 B2
`
`APP=APP,+
`
`X
`
`APP=APP,+
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`x
`
`APP=APP,
`
`>
`
`> ~———> +
`
`APP=APP,-
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`¢)
`
`d)
`
`Fig. 3
`
`APP=APP,+
`
`
`in.oo
`
`APP=APP,+
`
`X
`
`nN
`
`APP=APP,
`
`
`
`
`X
`
`
`>
`
`APP=APP,-
`t
`>
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`d)
`
`Fig. 4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`APP=APP,+
`APP=APP,+ a)
`
`tPO
`
`Fig. 5
`
`Fig. 6
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`US8,787,603 B2
`
`tPO
`
`tPO
`
`a)
`
`a)
`
`Fig. 7
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`1
`METHOD FOR OPERATING A HEARING
`DEVICE AS WELL AS A HEARING DEVICE
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`
`The presentinventionrelatesto the field ofhearing devices.
`Moreparticularly, the present invention relates to a method
`for operating a hearing device in a waythatlets a user ofsaid
`hearing device acclimatize to the hearing device. Further-
`more, the present invention also relates to a hearing device.
`
`10
`
`BACKGROUNDOF THE INVENTION
`
`A hearing device is a device which compensates for the
`hearing loss of a user. A hearing device is usually worn at an
`ear or in the ear of the user. Additional devices such as a
`
`15
`
`remote control may be considered to be part of the hearing
`device.
`Usually, it takes some time for a user to get used to a
`hearing device. This process is called acclimatization and
`may take e.g. from several weeks upto half a year. Typically,
`hearing devices are tuned by a specialist such as an audiolo-
`gist. It has been shownthatacclimatization can be made more
`comfortable for a userif the intensity of the hearing device is
`initially low andis increased gradually during an acclimati-
`zation phase until target intensity is reached. Practically, this
`means that the hearing device user has to return to the spe-
`cialist several times for a retuning. At each visit the intensity
`of the hearing device is increased.
`In order to reduce the numberof visits necessary and to
`make the adjustment more steady, it has been proposed to
`increase the intensity of hearing device automatically, a fea-
`ture which is termed in this document“automatic acclimati-
`
`zation management”.
`Yor example, EP-B1-1 208 723 discloses a hearing device
`which automatically adjusts itself in time. The starting point
`as well as the end point of a parameter are defined according
`to the needs of the hearing device user. The adjustment is
`stepwise upon a trigger, which can be a clock event, an on-off
`event, a battery-replacementevent or an event indicating that
`a knob has been operated a numberof times. However, this
`solution has the disadvantage that the preferences of the user
`are not taken into account. The algorithm evaluates how long
`or how muchthe hearing device is used and not with which
`settings the hearing device is used. The hearing device is not
`able to determine if the user prefers a faster or a slower
`increase ofthe intensity of the hearing device.
`It is to be noted that the term “automatic acclimatization
`management” generally means the adjustment whichis acti-
`vated whenthe hearing device is switched on, but the adjust-
`ment may then be modified by the hearing device user during
`everyday operation using a user control. Usually, such a
`modification by the hearing device user is “lost” once the
`hearing device is switched off and on again, since the user
`control is generally intended to adjust the hearing device to
`momentary situations and not for long-term adjustment or
`acclimatization management. However,it is knownto statis-
`tically evaluate such settings by the user and to determine a
`new power-on-value for parameters based on suchstatistics.
`Such a feature is hereinafter called “user preference learn-
`ing”.
`For example, WO 2009/049 672 Al discloses a hearing
`device with learns from current user settings. If the user
`selects a higher volume and keeps this setting for an extended
`period of time,
`the power-on-volume is automatically
`adjusted. When the user switches on the hearing device the
`next time, the start volume will be a bit louder. Once the user
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`gets used to a first volume, he or she might select then a higher
`second volume, then an even higher third volume etc. How-
`ever, not all users show this behavior and after half a year,
`despite of the preference learning algorithm, the power-on-
`volume maystill be the same. Conventional “user preference
`learning” is therefore not well suited for acclimatization man-
`agement. In conventional “user preference learning”, it is not
`possible to define a target value towards whichthe learningis
`biased. A similar knownteaching is disclosed by US 2007/
`203726 Al.
`
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention addresses the problem to provide a
`method for operating a hearing device with an “automatic
`acclimatization management” which takes into account user
`preferences and whichis able to assure that the acclimatiza-
`tion phase is not excessively long for reaching an acclimati-
`zation target condition.
`This problem is solved by the features of claims 1 and 15,
`in particular by a methodfor operating a hearing device ina
`waythatlets a user of said hearing device acclimatize to said
`hearing device, said hearing device comprising
`a signal processing unit,
`a user control by which at least one audio processing
`parameterofsaid signal processing unit is adjustable by
`said user,
`a non-volatile memory
`said method comprising the steps of:
`a) writing a value indicative of a target power-on-value for
`said audio processing parameter to said non-volatile
`memory,
`b) waiting until said user switches on said hearing device,
`c) setting said audio processing parameter to a power-on-
`value, said power-on-value being stored in said non-
`volatile memory or being calculated from values stored
`in said non-volatile memory,
`d) allowingsaid user to continuously perform one or more
`adjustmentactionsby said user controlfor adjusting said
`audio processing parameter to his or her preferences in
`varying listening situations,
`e) executing an acclimatization algorithm simultaneously
`with step d), after step d) and/or before step c), said
`acclimatization algorithm being designed to approxi-
`mate said power-on-value (POV) in the long term, in
`particular in more than a week,to said target power-on-
`value, said acclimatization algorithm determining a
`replacement value for said power-on-value taking into
`account whichsetting or settings for said audio process-
`ing parameterhas or have beenset bysaid user and how
`long said setting or settings have been active,
`f) repeating steps b) to e) until an acclimatization phase
`termination conditionis fulfilled.
`Taking into account whichsetting or settings for an audio
`processing parameter (APP) has or have been set by the
`hearing device user and howlongsaidsetting or settings have
`been active has the advantagethat it opens up the possibility
`to implement a well balanced compromise between a forced
`acclimatization which cannot be influenced by the hearing
`device userat all and an acclimatization which fully relies on
`the selection of more intense settings by the hearing device
`user.
`
`Further embodiments and advantages emerge from the
`claims and the description referringto thefigures.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Thepresentinventionis further described in more detail by
`referring to drawings showing exemplified embodiments.
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`3
`4
`frequently (e.g. every hour) in the non-volatile memory
`FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a hearing device
`7 to be the next power-on value. The intermediate value
`according to the present invention;
`X lastly stored to the non-volatile memory7is therefore
`FIG. 2 shows how an audio processing parameter is
`the first replacement power-on-value rPOV,.
`changed over time in a hearing aid according to the present
`At time “G’’, the hearing device user 10 switches on the
`invention;
`hearing device 1. The audio processing parameter APP
`FIG. 3 shows an example ofa linear acclimatization man-
`is set to the previously stored power-on-value.
`agement without taking into accountuser inputs;
`Attime “H”, the acclimatization phase ends. The interme-
`FIG. 4 shows an example ofa linear acclimatization man-
`diate value X has reached the target power-on-value
`agement with taking into account user inputs;
`tPOV. Fromthis pointon, the intermediate value X is not
`FIG. 5 shows an example of an unbiased user preference
`changed any more.
`learning; and
`At time “T”, the hearing device user 10 switches off the
`FIG. 6 shows an example of a biased user preference learn-
`hearing device 1. The second replacement power-on-
`ing;
`value rPOV,, which is now stored in the non-volatile
`FIG. 7 showsa further example of a biased user preference
`memory 7 is the target power-on-value tPOV.
`learning.
`It is to be noted thatthe increase of the intermediate value
`The described embodiments are meant as examples and
`shall not confine the present invention.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a hearing device 1
`according to one embodiment of the present
`invention.
`Sounds are picked up by a microphone 2, processed by a
`signal processor 9 and are presented to a hearing device user
`10 by a receiver 3. The magnitude of the amplification can be
`controlled by a volume control 4. There is further an on/off
`switch 5. The signal processing is based on audio processing
`parameters. A controller 6 is adapted to set such parameters,
`for example, when the hearing device 1 is switched on or
`when the volumecontrol 4 is actuated. There is a non-volatile
`
`memory 7 to store parameters while the hearing device 1 is
`switched off. The controller 6 is adapted to execute an accli-
`matization algorithm of the kind described further down
`below.
`T'IG. 2 shows howan audio processing parameter APP is
`changed over time ina hearing device 1 (FIG.1) according to
`one embodimentofthe present invention. The hearing device
`1 is initially fitted to a hearing loss of a hearing device user 10
`and is then used for an extended period oftime,as for example
`several months, until the hearing device user 10 returns to the
`fitter, e.g. the audiologist.
`At time “A”, a fitter programs an initial power-on value
`iPOV for the audio processing parameter APP as well as
`a target power-on value tPOV. The audio processing
`parameter APP is typically volume but mayalso be
`something else, as, for example, treble or noise cancel-
`ing. The target power-on value tPOVis, for example, 10
`dB higherthan the initial power-on value iPOV.
`At time “B”, the hearing device user 10 switches on the
`hearing device 1. The initial power-on-value iPOV is
`read from the non-volatile memory 7. The audio-pro-
`cessing parameter APP is set to the initial power-on
`value iPOV.
`At time “C”, the hearing device user 10 uses the hearing
`device 1 but has not actuated the control 4 yet. An inter-
`mediate value X which will later becomethe next power-
`on value is increased slowly.
`At time “D”, the hearing device user 10 has selected the
`audio-processing parameter APP to be two steps higher
`thanthe initial audio-processing parameter APP, The
`intermediate value X is now increasedfaster.
`
`At time “E”, the hearing device user 10 has selected the
`audio-processing parameter APP to be one step lower
`than theinitial audio-processing parameter APP,,.z The
`intermediate value X is now increased sloweragain.
`At time “F”, the hearing device user 10 switches off the
`hearing device 1. The intermediate value X is now stored
`
`X as well as the power-on-value POV is shown exaggerated
`for illustrative purposes. Usually, the acclimatization phase
`will take few weeks up to several months and not only one and
`a half days as in the example. It is also to be notedthat, since
`acclimatization is a rather slow process, it does not matterif
`the change dueto the acclimatization algorithm is already
`applied during the current usage period, or, as shown in FIG.
`2, not until the hearing device 1 is switched off and on again.
`Preferably, the acclimatization process is controlled by
`software being executed on the controller 6 (FIG. 1). Hence,
`the controller 6 is adapted to perform the followingsteps:
`a) writing a value indicative of said target power-on value
`tPOV for said audio processing parameter APP to the
`non-volatile memory 7,
`b) waiting until the hearing device user 10 switches on the
`hearing device 1,
`c) setting said audio processing parameter APPto a power-
`on value POV, said power-on value POV being stored in
`said non-volatile memory 7 or being calculated from
`values stored in said non-volatile memory 7,
`d) allowing said hearing device user 10 to continuously
`perform one or more adjustmentactions by the control 4
`for adjusting said audio processing parameterAPPto his
`or her preferences in varying listening situations,
`e) executing an acclimatization algorithm simultaneously
`with step d), after step d) and/or before step c), said
`acclimatization algorithm being designed to approxi-
`mate said power-on value POV in the long term,
`in
`particular in more than a week,to said target power-on
`value tPOV, said acclimatization algorithm determining
`areplacement value rPOVfor said power-on value POV
`taking into account which setting or settings for said
`audio processing parameter APP hasor have been set by
`said hearing device user 10 and howlongsaid setting or
`settings have been active.
`Steps b) to e) are repeated until an acclimatization phase
`termination condition is fulfilled. The acclimatization phase
`termination condition can be one of the following:
`the power-on value POV is above a threshold value T;
`the intermediate value X is above a threshold value T.
`
`The threshold value T be the target power-on value tPOV
`itself or it can be calculated from it by a formula:
`
`T=tPOV-dist,
`
`in particular with
`
`dist=p* ((POV-iPOV)
`
`iPOVis an initial power-on value. For example, dist is equal
`to 1 dB, and p is equal to 0.1, for example.
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`6
`10 for N>0, APP, is defined to be the power-on value POV
`stored in the non-volatile memory 7. Preferably, one of the
`following conditions applies:
`
`alpha=beta=gammaz=0
`
`alpha=beta=gamma.
`
`X,,.18 a reference value and can either be Xp or Xj...
`An alternative user input dependentlinear acclimatization
`algorithm is defined by the following update function for
`intermediate value X:
`
`fu(Xw_1, APPy) =
`
`Xy-1 +a%(APPy —APPyrep) for APPy > Xref +0
`Xy-1 +6 for APPy = [Xref —b, Xref +b]
`Xy-1 + ¢#(APPy —APPyep)!
`for APPy < Xpep — b
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`5
`In the example depicted in FIG.2, the power-on value POV
`remains constant after the acclimatization phase ends. How-
`ever, the acclimatisation algorithm can also be replaced by an
`unbiased user preference learning algorithm after termination
`of the acclimatization phase. Executing a user preference
`learning algorithm can lead to a condition where the acclima-
`tization termination condition is not fulfilled any more, for
`example, if the hearing device user keeps selecting a lower
`volume. In this case, it is possible to automatically reactivate
`the acclimatization algorithm.
`FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a linear acclimatization
`algorithm which does not take into account user inputs and
`which is knownin the state of the art. The inclination of the
`line representing intermediate value X is independent of how
`the audio processing parameter APP was adjusted by the
`hearing device user 10. In FIG.3a, it was adjusted by adding
`twosteps, in FIG. 3b by adding onestep, in FIG. 3c it was not
`adjusted at all and in FIG. 3d it was adjusted by subtracting
`one step. In each case, the adjustment was performed right
`20
`FIG.5illustrates an example of an unbiased user prefer-
`after switching the hearing device 1 on. The intermediate
`ence learning algorithm which is knowninthestate ofthe art.
`value X can be calculated periodically by the following
`The algorithm is designed to determinea setting statistically
`update function:
`preferred by a hearing device user 10 for the audio processing
`parameter APP. The algorithm is unbiased becauseits behav-
`ior is the same, independentofwhethera positive (FIG. 5a) or
`negative (FIG. 5b) adjustmenthas been applied by the hearing
`device user 10.
`
`Xy=fuXn.v)>
`
`in particular
`
`Xy=Xy. 1+const
`
`X,vis the result of the N-th calculation of the update function
`since the hearing device 1 waslast switched on. X, is defined
`to be the power-on value POV. The last intermediate value
`Ximaxny being calculated before the hearing device 1 is
`switched off is the replacement power-on value rPOV thatis
`stored as new power-on value POV.
`Since the function uses the result of the previous calcula-
`tion ofthe function, it is a recursive function. The speedofthe
`acclimatization can be selected by choosing a suitable update
`interval, as for example one hour as well as a suitable value for
`const, as for example 0.001 dB. The principles explained
`referring to FIG. 3 also apply for the update functions f;,
`described below.
`FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a user input dependent
`linear acclimatization algorithm according to one embodi-
`ment of the present invention. It takes into account which
`setting or settings have been chosen by the hearing device
`user 10 and how long suchsetting orsettings have beenactive.
`When the hearing device user 10 has increased the audio
`processing parameter APP by oneortwosteps, acclimatiza-
`tion is faster (FIGS. 4a and 46). When the audio processing
`parameter APPis left at the power-on value POV, acclimati-
`zation is slower (FIG. 4c), and when the hearing device user
`10 has decreased the audio processing parameter APP by one
`step, acclimatization is even slower (FIG. 4d). The interme-
`diate value X is calculated periodically, for example every
`minute, by the following update function:
`Xy=fulXy.1,APPw}
`
`The update functionis in particular
`
`fu(Xw-1, APPy) =4
`
`Xy-1 + alpha for APPy > Xref
`Xw-1 + beta for APPy = Xref
`Xy-1 + gamma for APPy < Xref
`
`APP, is a current setting for the audio processing param-
`eter APP. APP,, can be influenced by the hearing device user
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`The intermediate value X is calculated by the following
`periodically calculated update function:
`
`Xy=Xy_*weight+APP,*(1-weight)
`
`Weight is a parameter indicating how muchprevious learnt
`valuesare to be regardedrelative to the present setting of the
`audio processing parameter APP,,.
`VIG. 6 illustrates an example of a biased user preference
`learning algorithm. The learning algorithm is derived from
`the unbiased learning algorithm describedreferring to FIG. 5.
`The learning algorithm is biased because adjustments by the
`hearing device user 10 ina first adjustmentdirection are taken
`into accountstronger than adjustments in an opposing second
`adjustment direction. The first adjustment direction is the
`direction towards the target power-on value tPOV. The adjust-
`ments in the first adjustment direction are implemented by
`applying a faster learning speed than for adjustments in the
`second adjustmentdirection. If the audio processing param-
`eter APP is volume,the first adjustment direction is louder—
`the device becomes more intense—and the second adjust-
`ment direction is
`softer. The intermediate value X is
`calculated by the following periodically calculated update
`function:
`
`fu(Xw-1, APPy) =
`
`Xy-1#Wa + APPy «(1 — Wa) for APPy > Xyep
`Xy_1# Wp + APPy «(1 — Wg) for APPy = Xvep
`Xv. #We + APPy «(1 —We) for APPy < Xpep
`
`The user input dependent speed of learning is defined by
`selecting
`
`WieWo
`
`wherein in particular
`
`W4sWpsWoc.
`
`X,,18 a reference value and can either be Xp or Xj).
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`The invention claimed is:
`
`8
`
`7
`An alternative biased user preference learning algorithm is
`defined by the following update function for intermediate
`value X:
`
`FyXy-APPy)=Xy*VW(APPy)+APPy*(1- (APP)
`wherein
`
`W(APPy) =
`
`Ax f(APPy — APPyep) for APPy > Xref
`Bx f(APPy — APPrep) for APPy = Xref
`Cx f(APPy — APPrep) for APPy < Xref
`
`10
`
`20
`
`1.A methodfor operating a hearing device (1) ina waythat
`lets a hearing device user (10) acclimatize to said hearing
`device (1), said hearing device (1) comprising:
`a signal processing unit (9),
`a user control (4) by which at least one audio processing
`parameter (APP) of said signal processing unit (9) is
`adjustable by said hearing device user (10), and
`a non-volatile memory (7),
`said method comprising the steps of:
`a) writing a value indicative of a target power-on value
`(tPOV) for said audio processing parameter (APP) to
`said non-volatile memory (7),
`15
`b) waiting until said hearing device user (10) switches on
`FIG. 7 showsa further example ofabiased user preference
`learning algorithm.It is a combinationof the linear acclima-
`said hearing device (1),
`tization algorithm shownin FIG. 3 and the biased userpref-
`c) setting said audio processing parameter (APP) to a
`erence learning algorithm shownin FIG.6. The acclimatiza-
`power-on value (POV), said power-on value (POV)
`tion algorithm periodically calculates, while the hearing
`being either stored in said non-volatile memory (7) or
`device 1 is on, an intermediate acclimatization value Y based
`being calculated from values stored in said non-volatile
`on an acclimatization update function
`memory (7),
`d) allowing said hearing device user (10) to continuously
`perform one or more adjustment actions by said user
`control(4) for adjusting said audio processing parameter
`(APP)to said hearing device user’s preferences in vary-
`ing listening situations,
`e) executing an acclimatization algorithm simultaneously
`with step d), after step d) and/or before step c), said
`acclimatization algorithm being designed to approxi-
`mate said power-on value (POV)to said target power-on
`value (tPOV)after at least a week, said acclimatization
`algorithm determining a replacement power-on value
`(rPOV) for said power-on value (POV) taking into
`account whichsetting or settings for said audio process-
`ing parameter (APP)hasor have beenset by said hearing
`device user (10) and how long said setting or settings
`have been active, and
`f) repeating steps b) to e) until an acclimatization phase
`termination condition is fulfilled,
`wherein said acclimatization algorithm is a biased user
`preference learning algorithm, said biased user prefer-
`ence learning algorithm being derived from an unbiased
`user preference learning algorithm whichis designedto
`determinea settingstatistically preferred by said hearing
`device user (10) for said audio processing parameter
`(APP), said biased user preference learning algorithm
`being responsive to said adjustmentactions in a waythat
`adjustments in a first adjustmentdirection are taken into
`account stronger than adjustments in an opposing sec-
`ond adjustment direction, wherein said first adjustment
`direction is a direction towards said target power-on
`value (tPOV).
`2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the adjust-
`ments in the first adjustment direction are implemented by
`applying a faster learning speed than for adjustments in the
`second adjustmentdirection.
`3. The method according to one of the preceding claims,
`wherein said audio processing parameter (APP) is volume,
`and said first adjustment direction is louder and said second
`adjustmentdirectionis softer.
`4. Amethodfor operating a hearing device (1) ina way that
`lets a hearing device user (10) acclimatize to said hearing
`device (1), said hearing device (1) comprising:
`a signal processing unit (9),
`a user control (4) by which at least one audio processing
`parameter (APP) of said signal processing unit (9) is
`adjustable by said hearing device user (10), and
`
`Yy=Yy.+step
`
`as well as an intermediate learning value Z based on a learning
`update function
`
`25
`
`Zy =
`
`Zy_1*Wa + APPy «(1 — Wa) for APPy > Zyep
`Zy_1 Wp + APPy «(1 — Wa) for APPy = Zyer
`Zy-1#We + APPy «(1 —We)
`for APPy < Zyep
`
`Y,,is the result of the N-th calculation of the acclimatiza-
`tion update function since the hearing device 1 was last
`switched on, whereinY, is defined to be APPo. Z,;is the result
`of the N-th calculation of the learning update function since
`the hearing device waslast switched on, wherein Z, is defined
`to be APP,. APP,, is a current setting for the audio processing
`parameter APP. APP,,can be influenced by the hearing device
`user for N>0. APP,is the power-on value (POV)storedin the
`non-volatile memory 7. The replacement value rPOV for the
`power-on valueis calculated by a weighted average from the
`last intermediate acclimatization value Y_,,..(xy1 and the last
`intermediate learning value Z,,axcayj being calculated before
`the hearing device is switched off, according to the formula
`
`TPOV=Ypnacxcny]Weight+Znaxcny] (1 weight)
`
`rPOVis stored as the power-on-value (POV).
`In the above examples, the user preference learning algo-
`rithm as well as the acclimatization algorithm is defined by a
`periodically calculated update function. However, such algo-
`rithm may also be described in more general terms by the
`following function:
`
`rPOV=((POV,APP, ,APP>,APP3.. . )
`
`wherein POVis the power-on value, rPOVis the replacement
`power-on value, and APP,,is asample ofthe audio processing
`parameter APPat a particular time t,,. APP, is, for example,
`the first sample after the hearing device is switchedon.It does
`not matter when the functions or parts of the function are
`calculated. It may be calculated as soon as the necessary APP
`samples are available, i.e. during ongoing operation of the
`hearing device, but it is also possible to store samples or
`intermediate results in the non-volatile memory 7 and to
`calculate the function not before the hearing device 1 is
`switched on the nexttime.
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`

`

`a non-volatile memory (7),
`said method comprising the steps of:
`a) writing a value indicative of a target power-on value
`(tPOV) for said audio processing parameter (APP) to
`said non-volatile memory (7),
`b) waiting until said hearing device user (10) switches on
`said hearing device (1),
`c) setting said audio processing parameter (APP) to a
`power-on value (POV), said power-on value (POV)
`being either stored in said non-volatile memory (7) or
`being calculated from values stored in said non-volatile
`memory (7),
`d) allowing said hearing device user (10) to continuously
`perform one or more adjustment actions by said user
`control (4) for adjusting said audio processing parameter
`(APP)to said hearing device user’s preferences in vary-
`ing listening situations,
`e) executing an acclimatization algorithm simultaneously
`with step d), after step d) and/or before step c), said
`acclimatization algorithm being designed to approxi-
`mate said power-on value (POV)to said target power-on
`value (tPOV) after at least a week, said acclimatization
`algorithm determining a replacement power-on value
`(rPOV) for said power-on value (POV) taking into
`account whichsetting or settings for said audio process-
`ing parameter (APP)hasor have beensetby said hearing
`device user (10) and how longsaid setting or settings
`have been active, and
`f) repeating steps b) to e) until an acclimatization phase
`termination conditionis fulfilled,
`wherein said acclimatization algorithm periodically calcu-
`lates, while said hearing device (1) is on, an intermediate
`value (X) based on an update function:
`Xy=fuXn. APP}
`wherein
`X, is a result of an N-th calculation of said update
`function since said hearing device (1) was last
`switched on, wherein X,is defined to be a first audio
`processing parameter APP,,
`APP,, is a current setting for said audio processing
`Ax f(APPy — APPyep) for APPy > Xrop
`parameter (APP), wherein APP,,can be influenced by
`W(APPy) =2Bx f(APPy —APPyep) for APPy = Xpep
`said hearing device user (10) for N>0, while APP,is
`Cx f(APPy — APPyeg) for APPy < Xyep
`definedto be said power-on value (POV)stored in said
`non-volatile memory (7),
`wherein a last intermediate value (Xprg,.cwy)—being cal-
`culated before said hearing device (1) is switched off—
`is said replacement power-on value (rPOV)that is stored
`as a new power-on value (POV).
`5. The method according to claim 4, wherein said update
`function is a user input dependentlinear acclimatization func-
`tion
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`fu(Xy_1, APPy) =4
`
`Xy-1 + alpha for APPy > Xref
`Xy-1 +beta for APPy = Xpe
`Xy-1 + gamma for APPy < Xyef
`
`wherein one of the following conditions applies:
`alpha=beta=gamma
`
`or
`
`alpha=beta=gamma=0
`
`and
`
`NefXo OF XeXn-
`
`60
`
`65
`
`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`9
`
`10
`6. The method according to claim 4, wherein said update
`functionis a biased user preference learning function
`
`fu(Xw-1, APPy) =
`
`Xy-1#Wa + APPy «(1 — Wa) for APPy > Xyep
`Xy_y# Wg + APPy «(1 — Wg) for APPy = Xvep
`Xv. #We + APPy «(1 —We) for APPy < Xpep
`
`wherein a user input dependent speed of learning is defined
`byselecting
`WyeWo
`
`wherein
`
`WasWysW
`
`and
`
`X,Ye)
`
`=Xor XHXy1-
`
`7. The method according to claim 4, wherein said update
`function is a user input dependentlinear acclimatization func-
`tion
`
`fu(Xy-1, APPy) =
`
`Xw-1 +a%(APPy —APProp) for APPy > Xyep +8
`Xy-1 +6 for APPy = [Xyep — b, Xrep +B]
`Xy-1 +¢#(APPy —APPyep| for APPy < Xrep —b
`
`wherein
`
`APP.Xef=Xo or APP,=XeX
`
`8. The method according to claim 4, wherein said update
`function is a biased user preference learning function
`SolXy-1,APPy)=Xy.1 (APP)+APPy*(1- (APP)
`wherein
`
`wherein
`
`APP,ofMpefXo OF APPopMepAN
`
`9. A methodfor operating a hearing device (1) in a way that
`lets a hearing device user (10) acclimatize to said hearing
`device (1), said hearing device (1) comprising:
`a signal processing unit (9),
`a user control (4) by which at least one audio processing
`parameter (APP) of said signal processing unit (9) is
`adjustable by said hearing device user (10), and
`a non-volatile memory (7),
`said method comprising the steps of:
`a) writing a value indicative of a target power-on value
`(tPOV) for said audio processing parameter (APP) to
`said non-volatile memory (7),
`b) waiting until said hearing device user (10) switches on
`said hearing device (1),
`c) setting said audio processing parameter (APP) to a
`power-on value (POV), said power-on value (POV)
`being either stored in said non-volatile memory (7) or
`being calculated from values stored in said non-volatile
`memory (7),
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`11
`d) allowing said hearing

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket