throbber
US008787603B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`Fichtl et al.
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 8,787,603 B2
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`(54) METHOD FOR OPERATINGA HEARING
`DEVICE AS WELL AS A HEARING DEVICE
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Elmar Fichtl, Oetwil am See (CH);
`Michael Boretzki, Ruti (CH)
`
`(73) Assignee: Phonak AG, Stafa (CH)
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`2006/0222194 A1* 10/2006 Bramslow etai.
`2007/0147624 A1
`6/2007 Fischer
`2007/0203726 A1
`8/2007 Thompson
`2008/0107296 A1
`5/2008 Bachler et al.
`
`.......... .. 381/314
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`EP
`WO
`WO
`WO
`
`1208723 B1
`01/26419 A1
`2009-049672 A1
`2009/0144056 A1
`
`5/2002
`4/2001
`4/2009
`12/2009
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`
`13/517,154
`
`(22) PCT Filed:
`
`Dec. 22, 2009
`
`(86) PCT No.:
`
`PCT/EP2009/067716
`
`§ 371 (OX1),
`(2), (4) Date:
`
`Jun. 19, 2012
`
`(87) PCT Pub. No.: WO2010/031880
`
`PCT Pub. Date: Mar. 25, 2010
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2013/0114836A1
`
`May 9, 2013
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`H04R 25/00
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`USPC ........................................................ .. 381/314
`
`(2006.01)
`
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`CPC .............................. .. H04R 25/70; H04R 25/30
`USPC ......... .. 381/314, 323, 23.1, 60, 312, 328, 330
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2005/0036637 A1
`2005/0129262 A1
`2006/0198530 A1*
`
`2/2005 Janssen
`6/2005 Dillon et al.
`9/2006 Fischer et a1.
`
`................ .. 381/60
`
`International Search Report for PCT/EP2009/067716 dated Oct. 13,
`2010.
`Written Opinion for PCT/EP2009/067716 dated Oct. 13, 2010.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Primary Examiner — Brian Ensey
`Assistant Examiner — Norman Yu
`
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Pearne & Gordon LLP
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Acclimatization ofa hearing device user to a hearing device is
`made more acceptable by automatic acclimatization manage-
`ment. The intensity of the hearing device is increased in the
`long term, e. g. during several months. The speed of the inten-
`sity increase depends onuser inputs. A user controls an audio
`processing parameter (APP), such as volume, with a user
`control. Each time the user switches the hearing device off
`and on again, the power-on value (POV) ofthe audio process-
`ing parameter (APP) is changed. The amount of the change
`depends on which settings for the audio processing parameter
`(APP) have been selected by the hearing device user and how
`long the settings have been active. An initial power-on value
`(iPOV) and a target power-on value (tPOV), which is to be
`reached at the end (H) of the acclimatization phase, may be
`programmed by an audiologist.
`
`15 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`HIMPP 1003
`
`HIMPP 1003
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`Sheet 1 of4
`
`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`Sheet 2 of4
`
`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`APP=APP0+
`
`X
`
`APP=APPD+
`
`X
`
`X
`
` APP=APP,,
`
`>
`
`APP=APP0-
`> 2 V2129
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`0)
`
`d)
`
`Fig. 3
`
`A
`
`APP=APP0+
`
`A
`
`APP=APP,,+
`
`
`X
`d)
`
`APP=APP0-
`1
`>
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`Sheet 3 of4
`
`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`APP=APP0+
`
`APP=APP0-
`
`tPO APP=APP0+
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 22, 2014
`
`Sheet 4 of4
`
`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`tPO
`
`tPO
`
`
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`1
`METHOD FOR OPERATING A HEARING
`DEVICE AS WELL AS A HEARING DEVICE
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`
`The present invention relates to the field ofhearing devices.
`More particularly, the present invention relates to a method
`for operating a hearing device in a way that lets a user of said
`hearing device acclimatize to the hearing device. Further-
`more, the present invention also relates to a hearing device.
`
`10
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`A hearing device is a device which compensates for the
`hearing loss of a user. A hearing device is usually worn at an
`ear or in the ear of the user. Additional devices such as a
`
`15
`
`remote control may be considered to be part of the hearing
`device.
`
`Usually, it takes some time for a user to get used to a
`hearing device. This process is called acclimatization and
`may take e.g. from several weeks up to half a year. Typically,
`hearing devices are tuned by a specialist such as an audiolo-
`gist. It has been shown that acclimatization can be made more
`comfortable for a user if the intensity of the hearing device is
`initially low and is increased gradually during an acclimati-
`zation phase until target intensity is reached. Practically, this
`means that the hearing device user has to return to the spe-
`cialist several times for a retuning. At each visit the intensity
`of the hearing device is increased.
`In order to reduce the number of visits necessary and to
`make the adjustment more steady, it has been proposed to
`increase the intensity of hearing device automatically, a fea-
`ture which is termed in this document “automatic acclimati-
`
`zation management”.
`For example, EP-Bl-l 208 723 discloses a hearing device
`which automatically adjusts itself in time. The starting point
`as well as the end point of a parameter are defined according
`to the needs of the hearing device user. The adjustment is
`stepwise upon a trigger, which can be a clock event, an on-off
`event, a battery-replacement event or an event indicating that
`a knob has been operated a number of times. However, this
`solution has the disadvantage that the preferences of the user
`are not taken into account. The algorithm evaluates how long
`or how much the hearing device is used and not with which
`settings the hearing device is used. The hearing device is not
`able to determine if the user prefers a faster or a slower
`increase of the intensity of the hearing device.
`It is to be noted that the term “automatic acclimatization
`
`management” generally means the adjustment which is acti-
`vated when the hearing device is switched on, but the adjust-
`ment may then be modified by the hearing device user during
`everyday operation using a user control. Usually, such a
`modification by the hearing device user is “lost” once the
`hearing device is switched off and on again, since the user
`control is generally intended to adjust the hearing device to
`momentary situations and not for long-term adjustment or
`acclimatization management. However, it is known to statis-
`tically evaluate such settings by the user and to determine a
`new power-on-value for parameters based on such statistics.
`Such a feature is hereinafter called “user preference learn-
`ing”.
`For example, WO 2009/049 672 Al discloses a hearing
`device with learns from current user settings. If the user
`selects a higher volume and keeps this setting for an extended
`period of time,
`the power-on-volume is automatically
`adjusted. When the user switches on the hearing device the
`next time, the start volume will be a bit louder. Once the user
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`
`gets used to a first volume, he or she might select then a higher
`second volume, then an even higher third volume etc. How-
`ever, not all users show this behavior and after half a year,
`despite of the preference learning algorithm, the power-on-
`volume may still be the same. Conventional “user preference
`learning” is therefore not well suited for acclimatization man-
`agement. In conventional “user preference learning”, it is not
`possible to define a target value towards which the learning is
`biased. A similar known teaching is disclosed by US 2007/
`203726 Al .
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention addresses the problem to provide a
`method for operating a hearing device with an “automatic
`acclimatization management” which takes into account user
`preferences and which is able to assure that the acclimatiza-
`tion phase is not excessively long for reaching an acclimati-
`zation target condition.
`This problem is solved by the features of claims 1 and 15,
`in particular by a method for operating a hearing device in a
`way that lets a user of said hearing device acclimatize to said
`hearing device, said hearing device comprising
`a signal processing unit,
`a user control by which at least one audio processing
`parameter of said signal processing unit is adjustable by
`said user,
`a non-volatile memory
`said method comprising the steps of:
`a) writing a value indicative of a target power-on-value for
`said audio processing parameter to said non-volatile
`memory,
`b) waiting until said user switches on said hearing device,
`c) setting said audio processing parameter to a power-on-
`value, said power-on-value being stored in said non-
`volatile memory or being calculated from values stored
`in said non-volatile memory,
`d) allowing said user to continuously perform one or more
`adjustment actions by said user control for adjusting said
`audio processing parameter to his or her preferences in
`varying listening situations,
`e) executing an acclimatization algorithm simultaneously
`with step d), after step d) and/or before step c), said
`acclimatization algorithm being designed to approxi-
`mate said power-on-value (POV) in the long term, in
`particular in more than a week, to said target power-on-
`value, said acclimatization algorithm determining a
`replacement value for said power-on-value taking into
`account which setting or settings for said audio process-
`ing parameter has or have been set by said user and how
`long said setting or settings have been active,
`f) repeating steps b) to e) until an acclimatization phase
`termination condition is fulfilled.
`
`Taking into account which setting or settings for an audio
`processing parameter (APP) has or have been set by the
`hearing device user and how long said setting or settings have
`been active has the advantage that it opens up the possibility
`to implement a well balanced compromise between a forced
`acclimatization which carmot be influenced by the hearing
`device user at all and an acclimatization which fully relies on
`the selection of more intense settings by the hearing device
`user.
`
`Further embodiments and advantages emerge from the
`claims and the description referring to the figures.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`The present invention is further described in more detail by
`referring to drawings showing exemplified embodiments.
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`3
`FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a hearing device
`according to the present invention;
`FIG. 2 shows how an audio processing parameter is
`changed over time in a hearing aid according to the present
`invention;
`FIG. 3 shows an example of a linear acclimatization man-
`agement without taking into account user inputs;
`FIG. 4 shows an example of a linear acclimatization man-
`agement with taking into account user inputs;
`FIG. 5 shows an example of an unbiased user preference
`learning; and
`FIG. 6 shows an example of a biased user preference leam-
`ing;
`FIG. 7 shows a further example of a biased user preference
`learning.
`The described embodiments are meant as examples and
`shall not confine the present invention.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a hearing device 1
`according to one embodiment of the present
`invention.
`Sounds are picked up by a microphone 2, processed by a
`signal processor 9 and are presented to a hearing device user
`10 by a receiver 3. The magnitude of the amplification can be
`controlled by a volume control 4. There is further an on/off
`switch 5. The signal processing is based on audio processing
`parameters. A controller 6 is adapted to set such parameters,
`for example, when the hearing device 1 is switched on or
`when the volume control 4 is actuated. There is a non-volatile
`
`memory 7 to store parameters while the hearing device 1 is
`switched off. The controller 6 is adapted to execute an accli-
`matization algorithm of the kind described further down
`below.
`FIG. 2 shows how an audio processing parameter APP is
`changed over time in a hearing device 1 (FIG. 1) according to
`one embodiment of the present invention. The hearing device
`1 is initially fitted to a hearing loss of a hearing device user 10
`and is then used for a11 extended periodoftime, as for example
`several months, until the hearing device user 10 returns to the
`fitter, e.g. the audiologist.
`At time “A”, a fitter programs an initial power-on value
`iPOV for the audio processing parameterAPP as well as
`a target power-on value tPOV. The audio processing
`parameter APP is typically volume but may also be
`something else, as, for example, treble or noise cancel-
`ing. The target power-on value tPOV is, for example, 10
`dB higher than the initial power-on value iPOV.
`At time “B”, the hearing device user 10 switches on the
`hearing device 1. The initial power-on-value iPOV is
`read from the non-volatile memory 7. The audio-pro-
`cessing parameter APP is set to the initial power-on
`value iPOV.
`At time “C”, the hearing device user 10 uses the hearing
`device 1 but has not actuated the control 4 yet. An inter-
`mediate value X which will later become the next power-
`on value is increased slowly.
`At time “D”, the hearing device user 10 has selected the
`audio-processing parameter APP to be two steps higher
`than the initial audio-processing parameter APP,ef. The
`intermediate value X is now increased faster.
`
`At time “E”, the hearing device user 10 has selected the
`audio-processing parameter APP to be one step lower
`than the initial audio-processing parameter APP,ef. The
`intermediate value X is now increased slower again.
`At time “F”, the hearing device user 10 switches off the
`hearing device 1. The intermediate value X is now stored
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`
`frequently (e. g. every hour) in the non-volatile memory
`7 to be the next power-on value. The intermediate value
`X lastly stored to the non-volatile memory 7 is therefore
`the first replacement power-on-value rPOV1.
`At time “G”, the hearing device user 10 switches on the
`hearing device 1. The audio processing parameter APP
`is set to the previously stored power-on-value.
`At time “H”, the acclimatization phase ends. The interme-
`diate value X has reached the target power-on-value
`tPOV. From this point on, the intermediate value X is not
`changed any more.
`At time “I”, the hearing device user 10 switches off the
`hearing device 1. The second replacement power-on-
`value rPOV2 which is now stored in the non-volatile
`memory 7 is the target power-on-value tPOV.
`It is to be noted that the increase of the intermediate value
`
`X as well as the power-on-value POV is shown exaggerated
`for illustrative purposes. Usually, the acclimatization phase
`will take few weeks up to several months a11d not only one and
`a half days as in the example. It is also to be noted that, since
`acclimatization is a rather slow process, it does not matter if
`the change due to the acclimatization algorithm is already
`applied during the current usage period, or, as shown in FIG.
`2, not until the hearing device 1 is switched off and on again.
`Preferably, the acclimatization process is controlled by
`software being executed on the controller 6 (FIG. 1). Hence,
`the controller 6 is adapted to perform the following steps:
`a) writing a value indicative of said target power-on value
`tPOV for said audio processing parameter APP to the
`non-volatile memory 7,
`b) waiting until the hearing device user 10 switches on the
`hearing device 1,
`c) setting said audio processing parameter APP to a power-
`on value POV, said power-on value POV being stored in
`said non-volatile memory 7 or being calculated from
`values stored in said non-volatile memory 7,
`d) allowing said hearing device user 10 to continuously
`perform one or more adjustment actions by the control 4
`for adjusting said audio processing parameterAPP to his
`or her preferences in varying listening situations,
`e) executing an acclimatization algorithm simultaneously
`with step d), after step d) and/or before step c), said
`acclimatization algorithm being designed to approxi-
`mate said power-on value POV in the long term,
`in
`particular in more than a week, to said target power-on
`value tPOV, said acclimatization algorithm determining
`a replacement value rPOV for said power-on value POV
`taking into account which setting or settings for said
`audio processing parameter APP has or have been set by
`said hearing device user 10 and how long said setting or
`settings have been active.
`Steps b) to e) are repeated until an acclimatization phase
`termination condition is fulfilled. The acclimatization phase
`termination condition can be one of the following:
`the power-on value POV is above a threshold value T;
`the intermediate value X is above a threshold value T.
`
`The threshold value T be the target power-on value tPOV
`itself or it can be calculated from it by a formula:
`
`T=tPOV—dist,
`
`in particular with
`
`dist:p* (tPOV—iPOV)
`
`iPOV is an initial power-on value. For example, dist is equal
`to 1 dB, and p is equal to 0.1, for example.
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`5
`In the example depicted in FIG. 2, the power-on value POV
`remains constant after the acclimatization phase ends. How-
`ever, the acclimatisation algorithm can also be replaced by an
`unbiased user preference learning algorithm after termination
`of the acclimatization phase. Executing a user preference
`learning algorithm can lead to a condition where the acclima-
`tization termination condition is not fulfilled any more, for
`example, if the hearing device user keeps selecting a lower
`volume. In this case, it is possible to automatically reactivate
`the acclimatization algorithm.
`FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a linear acclimatization
`algorithm which does not take into account user inputs and
`which is known in the state of the art. The inclination of the
`
`line representing intermediate value X is independent of how
`the audio processing parameter APP was adjusted by the
`hearing device user 10. In FIG. 3a, it was adjusted by adding
`two steps, in FIG. 3b by adding one step, in FIG. 3c it was not
`adjusted at all and in FIG. 3d it was adjusted by subtracting
`one step. In each case, the adjustment was performed right
`after switching the hearing device 1 on. The intermediate
`value X can be calculated periodically by the following
`update function:
`
`XN:fU(XN-1);
`
`in particular
`
`XN:XN_ 1+const
`
`XNis the result of the N-th calculation of the update function
`since the hearing device 1 was last switched on. X0 is defined
`to be the power-on value POV. The last intermediate value
`X[MaX(N)] being calculated before the hearing device 1 is
`switched off is the replacement power-on value rPOV that is
`stored as new power-on value POV.
`Since the function uses the result of the previous calcula-
`tion ofthe function, it is a recursive function. The speed ofthe
`acclimatization can be selected by choosing a suitable update
`interval, as for example one hour as well as a suitable value for
`const, as for example 0.001 dB. The principles explained
`referring to FIG. 3 also apply for the update functions fU
`described below.
`FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a user input dependent
`linear acclimatization algorithm according to one embodi-
`ment of the present invention. It takes into account which
`setting or settings have been chosen by the hearing device
`user 10 and how long such setting or settings have been active.
`When the hearing device user 10 has increased the audio
`processing parameter APP by one or two steps, acclimatiza-
`tion is faster (FIGS. 4a and 4b). When the audio processing
`parameter APP is left at the power-on value POV, acclimati-
`zation is slower (FIG. 4c), and when the hearing device user
`10 has decreased the audio processing parameter APP by one
`step, acclimatization is even slower (FIG. 4d). The interme-
`diate value X is calculated periodically, for example every
`minute, by the following update function:
`XN:fU<XN-1>APPN:‘
`
`The update function is in particular
`
`fU(XN—1sAPPN)=
`
`XN_1 + alpha for APPN > X,L,f
`Xp/,1 +beta for APPN = Xygf
`XN_1 + gamrna for APPN < Xmf
`
`APPN is a current setting for the audio processing param-
`eter APP. APPN can be influenced by the hearing device user
`
`6
`10 for N>0, APP0 is defined to be the power-on value POV
`stored in the non-volatile memory 7. Preferably, one of the
`following conditions applies:
`
`alpha2beta2gamrna20
`
`alphazbetazgamma
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`Xwfis a reference value and can either be X0 or XN_1.
`An alternative user input dependent linear acclimatization
`algorithm is defined by the following update function for
`intermediate value X:
`
`fU(XN_l, APPN) :
`
`XN_1+a*(APPN — APP,gf) for APPN > Xmf + b
`X/\/_1+b fOI‘ APP/V = [Xrgf —b, Xfgf + b]
`
`XN,1 + c* (APPN — APP,,f)’1 for APPN < X”, — b
`
`FIG. 5 illustrates an example of an unbiased user prefer-
`ence learning algorithm which is known in the state ofthe art.
`The algorithm is designed to determine a setting statistically
`preferred by a hearing device user 10 for the audio processing
`parameter APP. The algorithm is unbiased because its behav-
`ior is the same, independent ofwhether a positive (FIG. 5a) or
`negative (FIG. 5b) adjustment has been applied by the hearing
`device user 10.
`
`The intermediate value X is calculated by the following
`pcriodically calculatcd updatc function:
`
`XN:XN_1*weight+APPN* (l—weight)
`
`Weight is a parameter indicating how much previous learnt
`values are to be regarded relative to the present setting of the
`audio processing parameter APPN.
`FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a biased user preference
`learning algorithm. The learning algorithm is derived from
`the unbiased learning algorithm described referring to FIG. 5.
`The learning algorithm is biased because adjustments by the
`hearing device user 10 in a first adjustment direction are taken
`into account stronger than adjustments in an opposing second
`adjustment direction. The first adjustment direction is the
`direction towards the target power-on value tPOV. The adjust-
`ments in the first adjustment direction are implemented by
`applying a faster learning speed than for adjustments in the
`second adjustment direction. If the audio processing param-
`eter APP is volume, the first adjustment direction is louder—
`the device becomes more intense—and the second adjust-
`ment direction is
`softer. The intermediate value X is
`
`50
`
`calculated by the following periodically calculated update
`function:
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`fU(XN—1,APP/V) =
`
`XN_1* WA + APPN *(1— WA) for APPN > X”,
`XN_1* W3 + APPN *(1— W3) for APPN = Xrgf
`XN_1* WC + APPN *(1— WC) for APPN < X,,f
`
`The user input dependent speed of learning is defined by
`selecting
`
`WA: WC
`
`wherein in particular
`
`WAs W35 WC.
`
`Xwfis a reference value and can either be X0 or XN_1.
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`7
`An alternative biased user preference learning algorithm is
`defined by the following update function for intermediate
`value X:
`
`fU(XN_1,APPN):XN_1*W(APPN)+APPN*(l— W(APPN))
`wherein
`
`W(APPN) =
`
`A *f(APPN — APP,,,f) for APPN > Xmf
`B*f(APPN — APP,,,f) for APPN = Xmf
`C*f(APPN — APP,,,f) for APPN < Xmf
`
`FIG. 7 shows a further example of a biased user preference
`learning algorithm. It is a combination of the linear acclima-
`tization algorithm shown in FIG. 3 and the biased user pref-
`erence learning algorithm shown in FIG. 6. The acclimatiza-
`tion algorithm periodically calculates, while the hearing
`device 1 is on, an intermediate acclimatization valueY based
`on an acclimatizatio11 update function
`
`YN: YN_1+step
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`as well as an intermediate learning value Z based on a learning
`update function
`
`25
`
`ZN =
`
`zN,1* WA + APPN *(1— WA) for APPN > zmf
`zN,1* W3 + APPN *(1— W3) for APPN = 2,4
`zN,1* WC + APPN *(1— WC)
`for APPN < zmf
`
`YN is the result of the N-th calculation of the acclimatiza-
`tion update function since the hearing device 1 was last
`switched on, whereinYO is defined to be APPO. ZNis the result
`of the N-th calculation of the learning update function since
`the hearing device was last switched on, wherein Z0 is defined
`to be APPO. APPNis a current setting for the audio processing
`parameter APP. APPN can be influenced by the hearing device
`user for N>0. APPO is the power-on value (POV) stored in the
`non-volatilc memory 7. The replacement value rPOV for thc
`power-on value is calculated by a weighted average froin the
`last intermediate acclimatization value Y[mX(N)] and the last
`intermediate learning value Z[,,m(N)] being calculated before
`the hearing device is switched off, according to the fonnula
`
`rPOV:I},,,m(,\,)]*weight+Z[,,,ax(N)]*(1—weight)
`
`rPOV is stored as the power-on-value (POV).
`In the above examples, the user preference learning algo-
`rithm as well as the acclimatization algorithm is defined by a
`periodically calculated update function. However, such algo-
`rithm may also be described in more general terms by the
`following function:
`
`rPOV=f(POV,APP1,APP2,APP3 .
`
`. .)
`
`wherein POV is the power-on value, rPOV is the replacement
`power-on value, andAPPNis a sample ofthe audio processing
`parameter APP at a particular time tN. APP 1 is, for example,
`the first sample after the hearing device is switched on. It does
`not matter when the functions or parts of the function are
`calculated. It may be calculated as soon as the necessary APP
`samples are available, i.e. during ongoing operation of the
`hearing device, but it is also possible to store samples or
`intermediate results in the non-volatile memory 7 a11d to
`calculate the function not before the hearing device 1 is
`switched on the next time.
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`The invention claimed is:
`
`8
`
`1. A method for operating a hearing device (1) in a way that
`lets a hearing device user (10) acclimatize to said hearing
`device (1), said hearing device (1) comprising:
`a signal processing unit (9),
`a user control (4) by which at least one audio processing
`parameter (APP) of said signal processing unit (9) is
`adjustable by said hearing device user (10), and
`a non-volatile memory (7),
`said method comprising the steps of:
`a) writing a value indicative of a target power-on value
`(tPOV) for said audio processing parameter (APP) to
`said non-volatile memory (7),
`b) waiting until said hearing device user (10) switches on
`said hearing device (1),
`c) setting said audio processing parameter (APP) to a
`power-on value (POV), said power-on value (POV)
`being either stored in said non-volatile memory (7) or
`being calculated from values stored in said non-volatile
`memory (7),
`d) allowing said hearing device user (10) to continuously
`perform one or more adjustment actions by said user
`control (4) for adjusting said audio processing parameter
`(APP) to said hearing device user’ s preferences in vary-
`ing listening situations,
`e) executing an acclimatization algorithm simultaneously
`with step d), after step d) and/or before step c), said
`acclimatization algorithm being designed to approxi-
`mate said power-on value (POV) to said target power-on
`value (tPOV) after at least a week, said acclimatization
`algorithm determining a replacement power-on value
`(rPOV) for said power-on value (POV) taking into
`account which setting or settings for said audio process-
`ing parameter (APP) has or have been set by said hearing
`device user (10) and how long said setting or settings
`have been active, and
`f) repeating steps b) to e) until an acclimatization phase
`termination condition is fulfilled,
`wherein said acclimatization algorithm is a biased user
`preference learning algorithm, said biased user prefer-
`ence learning algorithm being derived from an unbiased
`user preference learning algorithm which is designed to
`determine a setting statistically preferred by saidhearing
`device user (10) for said audio processing parameter
`(APP), said biased user preference learning algorithm
`being responsive to said adjustment actions in a way that
`adjustments in a first adjustment direction are taken into
`account stronger than adjustments in an opposing sec-
`ond adjustment direction, wherein said first adjustment
`direction is a direction towards said target power-on
`value (tPOV).
`2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the adjust-
`ments in the first adjustment direction are implemented by
`applying a faster learning speed than for adjustments in the
`second adjustment direction.
`3. The method according to one of the preceding claims,
`wherein said audio processing parameter (APP) is volume,
`and said first adjustment direction is louder and said second
`adjustment direction is softer.
`4. A method for operating a hearing device (1) in a way that
`lets a hearing device user (10) acclimatize to said hearing
`device (1), said hearing device (1) comprising:
`a signal processing unit (9),
`a user control (4) by which at least one audio processing
`parameter (APP) of said signal processing unit (9) is
`adjustable by said hearing device user (10), and
`
`

`

`US 8,787,603 B2
`
`9
`
`a non-volatile memory (7),
`said method comprising the steps of:
`a) writing a value indicative of a target power-on value
`(tPOV) for said audio processing parameter (APP) to
`said non-volatile memory (7),
`b) waiting until said hearing device user (10) switches on
`said hearing device (1),
`c) setting said audio processing parameter (APP) to a
`power-on value (POV), said power-on value (POV)
`being either stored in said non-volatile memory (7) or
`being calculated from values stored in said non-volatile
`memory (7),
`d) allowing said hearing device user (10) to continuously
`perform one or more adjustment actions by said user
`control (4) for adjusting said audio processing parameter
`(APP) to said hearing device user’ s preferences in vary-
`ing listening situations,
`e) executing an acclimatization algorithm simultaneously
`with step d), after step d) and/or before step c), said
`acclimatization algorithm being designed to approxi-
`mate said power-on value (POV) to said target power-on
`value (tPOV) after at least a week, said acclimatization
`algorithm detennining a replacement power-on value
`(rPOV) for said power-on value (POV) taking into
`account which setting or settings for said audio process-
`ing parameter (APP) has or have been set by said hearing
`device user (10) and how long said setting or settings
`have been active, and
`f) repeating steps b) to e) until an acclimatization phase
`termination condition is fulfilled,
`wherein said acclimatization algorithm periodically calcu-
`lates, while said hearing device (1) is on, an intermediate
`value (X) based on an update function:
`XN:fU(XN-1>APPN:‘
`wherein
`
`XN is a result of an N-th calculation of said update
`function since said hearing device (1) was last
`switched on, wherein X0 is defined to be a first audio
`processing parameter APPO,
`APPN is a current setting for said audio processing
`parameter (APP), wherein APPN can be influenced by
`said hearing device user (10) for N>0, while APPO is
`defined to be said power-on value (POV) stored in said
`non-volatile memory (7),
`wherein a last intermediate value O([MaX(N)])—being cal-
`culated before said hearing device (1) is switched off—
`is said replacement power-on value (rPOV) that is stored
`as a new power-on value (POV).
`5. The method according to claim 4, wherein said update
`function is a user input dependent linear acclimatization func-
`tion
`
`fU(XN—1sAPPN)=
`
`XN,1 + alpha for APPN > X”,
`XN,1 +beta for APPN = X”,
`XN_1 + gamrna for APPN < X”,
`
`wherein one of the following conditions applies:
`alphazbetazgamrna
`
`OI
`
`alpha2beta2gamma20
`
`and
`
`Xre/FX0 or Xre/:XN_1.
`
`10
`6. The method according to claim 4, wherein said update
`function is a biased user preference learning function
`
`fU(XN—1,APP/V) =
`
`X,,,1* WA + APPN *(1— WA) for APPN > X”,
`X,,,1* W3 + APPN *(1— W3) for APPN = X”,
`X,,,1* WC + APPN *(1— WC) for APPN < X”,
`
`wherein a user input dependent speed of learning is defined
`by selecting
`WA== WC
`
`wherein
`
`WAs W55 WC
`
`and
`
`Xre :X0 orX,Ef:XN_1.
`
`7. The method according to claim 4, wherein said update
`function is a user input dependent linear acclimatization func-
`tion
`
`fU(XN-la APPN) =
`
`XN_1+a*(APPN — APP”,) for APPN > X”, + b
`XN,1 + b for APPN = [X”, — b, X”, + b]
`X,H + ca< (APPN — APP”,)’1 for APPN < X”, — b
`
`wherein
`
`APP”,/:X,E/FX0 or APP”,/:X,E/:XN_ 1.
`
`8. The method according to claim 4, wherein said update
`function is a biased user preference learning function
`fU(XN-1 >APPN):XN-1 *W(APPN)+APPN* (1 - W:APPN))
`wherein
`
`A * f(A PPN — APP”,) for APPN > X”,
`w(App,,) = B*f(APPN — APP”,) for APPN = X”,
`C* f(APPN — APP”,) for APPN < X”,
`
`wherein
`
`APP”,/:X,E/FX0 or APP”,/:X,E/:XN_ 1.
`
`9. A method for operating a hearing device (1) in a way that
`lets a hearing device user (10) acclimatize to said hearing
`device (1), said hearing device (1) comprising:
`a signal processing unit (9),
`a user control (4) by which at least one audio processing
`parameter (APP) of said signal processing unit (9) is
`adjustable by said hearing device user (10), and
`a non-volatile memory (7),
`said method comprising the steps of:
`a) writing a value indicative of a target power-on value
`(tPOV) for said audio processing parameter (APP) to
`said non-volatile memory (7),
`b) waiting until said hearing device user (10) switches on
`said hearing device (1),
`c) setting said

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket