throbber
CORRBPONDENCE
`
`531
`
`.
`“"‘v"
`Furthermore, by using
`
`( Ik—a+ 13+.»
`1 + 1., + 1,",
`
`kin
`k=n
`
`2 N
`2
`N
`k=l
`k=I
`]_—[cosq,.u21—u2q,,"'
`
`the PE expression given by (26) is approximated by
`
`P, 2
`
`{I — -F)
`
`_.,,
`
`(sin quads) (1 — #2 E qt”)
`
`lrzl
`
`been described by Frank and Zadoll [l] and Heimiller [2]. The
`lengths of such codes are restricted to perfect squares. It will be
`shown that codes with the same correlation properties can be
`constructed for any code length. The method is borrowed from
`the work of Schroeder [3] in connection with synthesis of low
`peak-factor signals.
`Consider a. code {a,,} of length N composed of unity modulus
`complex numbers. i.e.,
`
`at = exp risk,
`
`k = 0,1,---,N -1.
`
`(1)
`
`The autocorrelation function {xJ} is defined as follows:
`
`-exp (—a2a‘f2) do/rt},i2
`are (me) + (2a)-“=<q..ra“) exp (rio‘.’2a2) Q: 91:2
`N
`
`‘
`
`nr—1
`0
`xu - *3 aka,,
`N—J—l
`
`J\'—1
`
`xi
`
`k=D
`2 akaffl; +
`
`k
`
`=~—r
`
`3
`akak+j—N:
`
`c
`J = . 9"
`
`-,N— 1.
`
`(3)
`
`(37)
`erfc (ua) + (2n)‘”2a exp (-112.53) 1;‘ 9,3.
`Thus, (37) gives the approximate minimum average probability
`of error and (36) gives the approximate solution of (25) explicitly
`i.n terms of the known t',._,,, k = -—N,---,N,
`r: = —N,---,N.
`Finally, we observe that the technique used in this correspon-
`dence for the analysis of intersymbol interference in a binary
`low-pass pulse-communication system is also readily applicable
`to a binary or a quadriphase bandpass phase-shift-keyed (PSK)
`communication system.
`
`It is claimed that for any code length N, the phases at can be
`chosen such that for j = 1,2,- - -, N — 1, x, vanishes. The single
`maximum of magnitude N occurs at xo.
`Consider first the case that N is even. We claim that if
`
`a — exp 1' Mm;
`It
`N s
`
`where M is an integer relatively prime to N, then
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`The author wishes to thank Dr. L. Milstein and Prof. J.
`Omura for various helpful discussions on this correspondence.
`
`From (3)
`
`x,=0,
`
`j: l,2,~--,N— 1.
`
`REFERENCES
`[1] R. W. Lucky, J. Salz, and E. J. Weldon, Jr., Principles of Dara Com-
`mum'catr'an— New York: McGra.w-Hill, I968.
`[2] B. R. Saltzbcrg, “lntersymbol interference error bounds with applica-
`tion to ideal bendlimited signaling." IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. vol.
`lT—14. pp. 563-568. July 1963.
`[3] R. Lugannani, "lntersymbol interference and probability of error in
`digital systems," IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. vol. IT-15, pp. 682-688,
`Nov. 1969.
`[4] M. R. Aaron and D. W. Tufts, "Intersymbol interference and error
`an.
`.
`roba]l;i‘l2:y," IEEE Trans.
`Inform. Theory, vol.
`IT-I2, pp. 26—34.
`[5] E. Y Ho and Y. 5. Yeh, "A new approach for evaluating the error
`probability in the presence of intersymbol interference and additive
`Gaussian noise." Bel‘! Sysr. Tech. J., vol. 49, pp. 2249-2265, Nov. 1970.
`[6] 0. Shimbo and M. Celebiler. “The probability of error due to inter-
`symbol
`interference and Gaussian noise in digital communication
`s stems," IEEE Trans. Cammrm. TechnaL, vol. COM-I9, pp. ll3-119,
`pr. 1971.
`I
`fi._l]lErd§‘l?ri, Tables ofIntegral Transforms, vol. 1. New York; McGraw-
`
`[7]
`
`M
`N—l
`l'\|'—J—1
`Ag: 2 expi&[k‘ — (!c+j)2]+ E exp1'——E
`K=0
`:¢=N~J
`N
`N
`
`-[:8 — (k +j— NP],
`
`1': 1,2,---,N— 1.
`
`(5)
`
`Note that
`
`exp1'%‘(k +_,r' ~ N)’
`
`exp i% (k + D2 exp —i21tM(k + 1') exp EIINM
`Mn
`exp £17 (I: + 1')’,
`
`N even.
`
`The two summations of (5) may be combined.
`N-1
`x, = 2 exp r@ [:52 — (k + n2]
`ts=o
`N
`
`Polyphase Codes With Good Periodic Correlation Propertiw
`DAVID C. CHU
`
`"*1
`
`Mn
`.T _2k._ .1
`exp! N l
`J
`J]
`
`Ab.-:rmc!—'l‘l|is correspondence describes the construction of complex
`coda cl’ the form exp for. whose discrete circular nutocorrelatinns are
`zero for all nonzero lags. There is no restriction on code lengths.
`
`=exp—j
`
`Mnjz Nilk=o
`N
`
`_2::M;‘ "
`exp—r—T ,
`N
`
`j=l,2,---,N—l
`
`:0.
`
`Polyphase codes with a periodic autocorrelation function that
`is zero everywhere except at a single maximum per period have
`
`Manuscript received January 3]. 1932.
`The author is with the Hewlett-Packard Company, Santa Clara, Calif.
`95050.
`
`The last step comes from the fact that since M and N are
`relatively prime, then exp —t'(2nM}'N) is a primitive Nth root
`of unity. Therefore, exp —r'(21rMj/N) is an Nth root of unity but
`not equal to 1 for the range ofj shown in (6). Finally, we employ
`the theorem
`
`ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.
`Exhibit 1004-0001
`
`BlackBerry Exhibit 1007, pg. 1
`
`

`
`N—l
`
`kg% rk = 0,
`where r is an Nth root of unity and r aé 1.
`Consider next the case of N odd. We claim that if
`
`H 2 exp iiiinktic +1)
`I!
`N
`
`r
`
`where M is relatively prime to N, then
`
`j 21,2,---,N— 1.
`x, : 0,
`Substituting (7) into (3), we have
`N—.l'—l
`
`EXDf%[k(k+ l)—(k+j)(k+_i'+ 1)]
`“J: Ek=O
`H-1
`+ 2 cxp:E’t[ku.».+1)—(k+;'— N)
`ic=N—J'
`N
`
`-(k+,i'+1—N)].
`
`With some manipulation, one can show that for odd N,
`
`expi£;§[(k+j—N)(k+j+i—N)]
`
`= exp 9;" [Ur + ark + 1 +13]
`and the two summations in (8) can be combined into one:
`N—1
`. Mir
`exp 1
`
`[ktk +1)—(k + ;')(k +;'+1}]
`
`351:2k=O
`
`(9)
`
`A4
`N—l
`2 exp fl [-2176 F I2 - 1']
`k=o
`N
`N—l
`
`exp W-3% [f(__;' + I)]k;o [exp —i. 22r.ll/13]"N
`
`: 0,
`
`j : l,- - -, N — 1 and Mrelatively prime to N.
`
`Thus a code of any length N may be phase coded by either (4)
`or (T), respectively, depending on whether N is even or odd, and
`the resulting code will have the desired correlation properties.
`Trivial variations such as cyclic shifts, addition of a constant to
`at,“ or conjugating the entire code obviously will not aliect the
`autocorrelation function analogously to the aperiodic case [4].
`In addition, certain linear phase shifts of the form exp i'(2nql:,'N),
`where q is any integer, when introduced into the code also will
`not alfect the correlation. To show this, let the modified sequence
`be {bk} where
`
`i'2irq
`bk 2 an exp —— .
`N
`
`Substituting (7,, for L1,, in (3)
`
`IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, JULY 1972
`
`REFERENCES
`
`[I] R. L. Frank and S. A. Za_dofi', “Phase shifl pulse codes with good
`periodic correlation properties," IRE Trans. Inform. Theory (Corresp.),
`vol. lT—B, pp. 381-382, Oct. I962.
`_
`_
`_
`[2] R. C. Heimillcr, "Phase shift codes with good periodic correlation
`figgrliertles." IRE Trans. hifarin. Theory. vol. IT-7, pp. 254-257, Oct.
`[3] M. R. Schroeder. “Synthesis o!'_low-peak-factor signals and binary
`sequences with low autocorrelation," IEEE Trans.
`inform. Theory
`tCorresp.), vol.
`lT—l6, pp. 85-89. Jan. 1970.
`[4] S. W. Golomb and R. A. Scholtz. "Generalized Barker sequences."
`IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. Vol. IT-ll. P13. 533-537, Oct. 1965.
`
`A Stochastic Model for Burst-Correcting Convolutional
`Decoders
`
`PHILIPPE PIRET
`
`Ab.i-mm—A stochastic model is described for the decoder of an optimal
`burst-correcting comrolutional code. From tltis model, an upper bound is
`obtained for 13, the error probability per word after decoding.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`[6], use stochastic models to analyze
`[5],
`Recent papers
`decoders. We use here similar methods to upperbound the error
`probability after decoding of an optimal binary burst-error-
`correcting convolutional code.
`A burst of r consecutive words followed by a guard space G
`of r-(ii + k)f(.-2 e 12) correct words [1] is always correctable by
`an optimal type-B2 code. Optimal codes for this bound are well
`known [2], [3] and the practical construction of a type-B2 code
`for arbitrary r requires only the construction of a type-B; code
`with r = 1. This last code is called basic, and codes with r > I
`are Obtained by interlacing.
`A basic code can be defined as the set of all binary Semi-
`infinite sequences orthogonal
`to the matrix A constructed by
`indefinitely displacing the binary matrix B by (it — k) rows lower
`at each time (Fig. I).
`The matrix B defining a code can be divided into X sub-
`matrices 3,:
`
`3 =
`
`Bu
`Bl‘
`BK—1
`
`where each B, has (11 — k) rows.
`We shall consider systematic codes such that the last (rt — k)
`columns of B0 form an identity matrix, and for 1'
`;-E 0 the last
`(it —- k) colurrins of B; are zero. We also restrict our study to
`nonsingular codes, i.e., codes defined by a matrix B whose first
`iri rows form a nonsingular matrix. This family includes the
`Berle]-:amp—Preparala codes as a subclass
`[2],
`Optimal
`codes can be constructed if (it
`-— k) is a factor of (rt + k). We
`suppose that (H — k) and ii are relatively prime. Otherwise a
`shorter code exists, with the same rate and correcting capability
`and no larger guard space G [7]. The only possible values of
`(H — k) are thus 1 and 2 for it odd and l for M‘ even.
`Let x be a received semi-infinite sequence of the code repre-
`sented as a column vector; then Ax is the syndrome sequence.
`Each word of x can be decoded by looking at N elements of
`Ax [4], where N, the number of rows" of the matrix B, is given
`
`Manuscript received September 3, I970; revised December 16, 1971.
`The author is with the MBLE Research Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.
`
`ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.
`Exhibit 1004-0002
`
`(10)
`
`(11)
`
`3
`‘Txflii+.r—N
`
`J
`
`N—}—1
`x_,— k:
`
`U N
`
`2
`akafuexpi ;q(k—k—j)
`-1
`2
`aRaf+_._”expii¥(k—k—j+ N)
`N-J
`N
`-—J—1
`iv
`1
`2 akal:+.l+ _g7
`=0
`I:
`j=l,2,---,N—l
`
`+
`
`=0,
`
`as the quantity inside the parentheses vanishes.
`
`BlackBerry Exhibit 1007, pg. 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket