`Trials@uspto.gov
`IPR2017-00804, Paper 31
`Tel: 571-272-782
`IPR2017-00805, Paper 32
`
` Entered: October 4, 2017
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`HOSPIRA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GENENTECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2017-00737 (US 7,892,549 B2)
`IPR2017-00804 (US 6,627,196 B1)
`IPR2017-00805 (US 7,371,379 B2)
`_______________
`
`
`Before ZHENYU YANG, CHRISTOPHER G. PAULRAJ, and
`ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PAULRAJ, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00737 (US 7,892,549 B2)
`IPR2017-00804 (US 6,627,196 B1)
`IPR2017-00805 (US 7,371,379 B2)
`
`We have determined to amend the scheduling order for these
`proceedings in order to consolidate the deadlines with IPR2017-01121,
`IPR2017-01122, IPR2017-01139, and IPR2017-01140. The oral hearing for
`these two groups of proceedings will not be consolidated, however. Any
`oral hearing in IPR2017-00737, IPR2017-00804, and/or IPR2017-00805
`will be directly followed by any oral hearing for IPR2017-01121, IPR2017-
`01122, IPR2017-01139, and/or IPR2017-01140. Counsel will be accorded
`preparation time between the two groups of proceedings but Board staff will
`not clear the room between proceedings.
`The parties are reminded that they may stipulate to different dates for
`DUE DATES 1 through 5 (earlier or later, but no later than DUE DATE 6),
`but may not stipulate to an extension of DUE DATES 6 and 7. The new
`deadlines are as follows:
`
`DUE DATE 1 .................................................................... December 21, 2017
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ............................................................................ March 8, 2018
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 .............................................................................. April 6, 2018
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................ April 20, 2018
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00737 (US 7,892,549 B2)
`IPR2017-00804 (US 6,627,196 B1)
`IPR2017-00805 (US 7,371,379 B2)
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ............................................................................ April 27, 2018
`Response to observation
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ............................................................................... May 2, 2018
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ............................................................................... May 8, 2018
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00737 (US 7,892,549 B2)
`IPR2017-00804 (US 6,627,196 B1)
`IPR2017-00805 (US 7,371,379 B2)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Amanda Hollis
`Stefan Miller
`Karen Younkins
`Mark McLennan
`Benjamin Lasky
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`Amanda.hollis@kirkland.com
`Stefan.miller@kirkland.com
`Karen.younkins@kirkland.com
`Mark.mclennan@kirkland.com
`Blasky@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Owen Allen
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`Owen.Allen@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`Adam Brausa
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`brausa@durietangri.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
