throbber

`
`
`Volume 13 - Number 6 - 19 September 1996
`Hospira v. Genentech
`Hospira v. Genentech
`IPR2017-00737
`IPR2017—00737
`Genentech Exhibit 2029
`Genenterch Exhlblt 2029
`
`----------- --
`
`'-:-2-,:
`
`"333.323..
`
`HEALTH SCIEMEES LIBRARY
`University of Wisconsin
`
`OCT 1 8 1996
`
`1305 Linden Drive
`Madison WI 53709
`
`STOCKTON
`
`

`

`p’fi
`STOCKTON
`
`Oncogene is published by Stockton Press, a division of
`Macmillan Press Ltd.
`
`Scope Oncogene is published twice a month. The
`Editors will consider for publication all papers and
`communications on all aspects of cellular growth
`control and the molecular mechanisms underlying
`malignant change.
`
`The contents page of this journal is now available on the
`Internet before publication at: http://www.stockton—
`press.co.uk
`
`This journal is covered by Current Contents, Excerpta
`Medica and Index Veterinarius.
`
`Editorial Manuscripts and all editorial correspondence
`should be sent to: John Jenkins, Marie Curie Research
`Institute, The Chart, Oxted, Surrey RH8 OTL, UK.
`Tel: +44 (0)1883 717 273 Fax: +44 (0)1883 717 448 or
`E Premkumar Reddy, The Fels Institute for Cancer
`Research & Molecular Biology, Medical Research
`Building, 3420 North Broad St., Philadelphia, PA
`19140, USA.
`Tel: +1 215 707 4307 Fax: +1 215 707 1454.
`
`Advertisements Enquiries concerning advertisements
`should be addressed to: Michael Rowley, Hasler House,
`High Street, Great Dunmow, Essex CM6 lAP, UK. Tel:
`+44 (0)1371 874613
`Fax: +44 (0)1371 872273.
`
`Publisher All business correspondence, supplement
`enquiries and reprint requests should be addressed to
`Oncogene, Stockton Press, Houndmills, Basingstoke,
`Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1256
`29242 Fax: +44 (0)1256 810526.
`Publisher: Jayne Marks
`Production Controller: Debbie Cole
`
`Subscriptions — EU/Rest of World Subscription price
`per annum (two volumes, 24 issues); EU £890; rest of the
`world £960 (surface), £1135 (airmail) or equivalent in
`any other currency. Orders must be accompanied by
`remittance. Cheques should be made payable to
`Macmillan Magazines and sent
`to: The Subscription
`Department, Macmillan Press Ltd, Houndmills,
`Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK. Where
`appropriate, subscribers may make payments into UK
`Post Office Giro Account No. 519 2455. Full details
`
`must accompany the payment. Subscribers from EU
`territories should add sales tax at the local rate.
`
`Subscriptions — USA USA subscribers call toll free 1-
`800-221 2123 or send check/money order/credit card
`details to: Stockton Press, 345 Park Avenue South, 13th
`Floor, New York, NY 10010-1707. Tel: +1 212 689
`9200 Fax: +1 212 689 9711. USA annual subscription
`rates: (institutional/corporate), $1525 (surface) $1805
`(airmail). Prices are set in UK Sterling. Dollar prices are
`converted to UK Sterling at the current exchange rate.
`Accordingly, your credit card charge may vary slightly
`from the dollar rate shown. To obtain the exact dollar
`rate shown above, please remit by check. All prices are
`subject to change without notice.
`
`Oncogene (ISSN 0950-9232) is published twice a month
`by Macmillan Press Ltd, c/o Mercury Airfreight
`International Ltd, 2323 Randolph Avenue, Avenel, NJ
`07001, USA. Subscription price for institutions is $1805
`per annum. 2nd class postage is paid at Rahway NJ,
`Postmaster: send address corrections to Macmillan
`Press Ltd, c/o Mercury Airfreight International Ltd,
`2323 Randolph Avenue, Avenel, NJ 07001.
`
`Reprints of any article in this journal are available from
`Stockton Press, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire
`RG21 6XS, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1256 29242, Fax: +44
`(0)1256 810526.
`
`Copyright
`
`© 1996 Stockton Press
`ISSN 0950-9232
`
`All rights of reproduction are reserved in respeCL of all
`papers, articles,
`illustrations, etc., published in this
`journal in all countries of the world.
`
`All material published in this journal is protected by
`copyright, which covers exclusive rights to reproduce
`and distribute the material. No material published in
`this journal may be reproduced or stored on microfilm
`or in electronic, optical or magnetic form without the
`written authorisation of the Publisher.
`
`internal or
`Authorisation to photocopy items for
`personal use of specific clients, is granted by Stockton
`Press, for libraries and other users registered vith the
`Copyright Clearance Centre (CCC) Transaction
`Reporting Service, provided that the base fee 01 $12-00
`per copy is paid directly to CCC, 21 Congress St,
`Salem, MA 01970, USA 0950-9232/96 $12.00+$0.00
`
`Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research
`or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted
`under the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988, this
`publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted,
`in any form or by any means, only with tl.e pf“)r
`permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case 0
`reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms
`of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency'
`
`Typeset by Elite Typesetting Techniques, Eastleigh, Hams and printed in Great Britain by The Friary Press, Dorchester
`Printed on acid—free paper, effective with Volume 9, Issue 1, 1994
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`

`

`Taxol resistance of p185-overexpressing breast cancer cells
`D Yu et al
`
`for
`expression may be a useful prognostic factor
`predicting responsiveness of breast cancers
`to che-
`motherapy.
`In this study, we investigated whether overexpression
`of p185 may lead to increased drug resistance in
`human breast cancers by comparing p185-low-expres—
`sing MDA—MB—435 parental
`cells with the p185-
`overexpressing MDA—MB-435 c-erbB—2 stable transfec-
`tants
`for Taxol
`sensitivity. We
`also investigated
`iwhether cell cycle characteristics, oncogenic transfor-
`mation, and the ma’r-Z-encoded p170 may be involved
`in the increased Taxol resistance.
`
`Results
`
`Increased Taxol resistance in MDA—MB-435 c—erbB—Z
`
`transféctcmts
`
`To examine whether c-erbB-Z/neu overexpression can
`lead to increased chemoresistance in breast cancer cells,
`we needed to have a panel of human breast cancer cell
`lines with a similar genetic background but expressing
`different levels of p185. Differences in chemosensitivity
`among these cells should be caused by the differences
`in p185 expression. To achieve this, we used the MDA-
`MB-435 human breast cancer cells that express very
`low levels of p185 and are highly sensitive to Taxol as
`the recipient
`for transfection. We cotransfected the
`pCMVerbB-2 plasmid containing the 4.4 kb full—length
`human c-erbB—Z cDNA (Yamamoto et (11., 1986) and
`the pSV2-neo plasmid carrying the neomycin-resistance
`selection marker gene into MDA—MB—435 cells. G418-
`resistant clones were selected and expanded into cell
`lines that were designated 435.eB cell lines. The same
`approach was used to select control 435.neo and
`435.neo.pool cell lines, in which the pSV2-neo plasmid
`alone was transfected into MDA-MB-435 cells, and
`individual G418-resistant clone (435.neo) or pooled
`G418-resistant clones
`(435.neo.pool) were expanded
`into cell
`lines. It is possible that some of the 435.eB
`stable transfectants selected by such a cotransfection
`strategy may only harbor the neomycin—resistance gene
`but not the c-erbB-2 gene. Therefore, to identify those
`435.eB transfectants that integrated the transfected c-
`erbB-Z gene and actually produced p185 protein,
`immunoblot analysis with c-neu—Ab-3 antibodies were
`performed (Figure 1a). Four of the 435.eB transfec-
`tants
`(435.eB1,
`435.eB2,
`435.eB3
`and
`435.eB4)
`expressed increased amounts of p185 protein com-
`pared with the parental MDA-MB-435 cells. The
`control
`435.neo
`and
`435.neo.pool
`cell
`lines,
`as
`expected, did not express increased amounts of p185
`protein. The relative amounts of p185 in the 435.neo
`and 435.neo.pool
`cells and the 435.eBl, 435.eB2,
`435.eB3 and 435.eB4 transfectants are 1.16-, 0.99-,
`258-, 149-, 135- and l65-fold of that of the parental
`MDA-MB—435 cells
`(Table
`l),
`as determined by
`quantitation with the Personal Densitometor 50371
`(Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). Equal loading
`of protein lysates were confirmed by Western blot on
`oc-actin using anti-oc-actin monoclonal antibodies (Ab-l,
`Oncogene Science Inc., data not shown). It is notable
`that
`the p185 level
`in the 435.eB transfectant
`is
`comparable to that
`in the SK-BR-3 breast cancer
`cells established from a different patient, which express
`
`
`
`a
`
`m
`g
`<
`D
`E
`
`F-
`O
`t:
`a:
`
`<r
`a.)
`m
`
`m
`E
`m
`U)
`>4
`
`9185—
`
`n.u .
`
`b
`
`r—
`o
`a:
`C
`
`DC
`“.
`no
`a:
`
`p185—
`
`‘1.
`to
`(D
`
`EC
`“1
`no
`(D
`
`a.
`
`(a) Immunoblot analysis for the e—erbB-Z/neu—encoded
`Figure 1
`p185 proteins in the cell lysates of the indicated cell lines. 100 lig
`of protein from each sample was electrophoresed on 6% SDS—
`PAGE and transferred
`to nitrocellulose. The
`filters were
`incubated with the primary antibody c-neu—Ab—3 against p185.
`Position of the p185 is indicated on the left. The amounts of p185
`in the MDA«MB—435 cells, 435.ne0 and 435.neo.pool cells and the
`435.eBl, 435.eB2, 435.eB3, 435.eB4 transfectants were determined
`by quantitation with the Personal Densitometor 50371 (Molecular
`Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA)
`and
`shown in Table
`l.
`(b)
`Immunoblot analysis for the e-erbB-Z/neu-encoded p185 proteins
`in the cell
`lysates of the 435.neo.1, eB.lR, eB.2R, and 435.eB4
`cells.
`Immunoblot analysis were performed as
`in (3). Equal
`loading of protein lysates was confirmed by Western blot on or-
`actin using Ab-l
`anti—oc—actin monoclonal antibodies (data not
`shown)
`
`Table 1 Characteristics of cell lines
`
` Doubling time S—phase fractim
`
`Cell lines
`play-“32
`(h)
`(%)
`MDA-MB-435
`1.00
`20.53
`49.70
`435.neo.1
`1.16
`20.01
`37.70
`435.neo.pool
`0.99
`18.43
`45.00
`435.eB.1
`258.00
`17.94
`38.90
`435.eB.2
`149.00
`16.62
`36.40
`435.eB.3
`135.00
`18.11
`41.35
`
`435.eB.4 40.50 165.00 18.92
`
`
`
`Data represent an average of at least two different experiments. SDs
`for each point were less than 10%
`
`l28—fold (Kraus er (1]., 1987) and
`c-erbB-Z mRNA at
`p185 at 262—fold of that of the MDA—MB-435 cells
`(Figure la). We thus established a panel of stable
`transfectants that express differently increased amounts
`of p185 which are parallel
`to the c-erbB—2 gmc
`expression levels in primary human breast cancers.
`The 435.neo and 435.neo.pool cells were used as
`control cell
`lines to make sure that
`the changes in
`biological properties,
`such as
`chemosensitivity t0
`Taxol, in the 435.eB transfectants were not caused by
`the selection process or by transfection of the plasmids
`or the expression of pSV2-neo gene.
`Once we established the MDA-MB-435 transfec-
`
`tants, we compared the Taxol chemosensitivity of the
`plSS-overexpressing transfectants (435.eB lines)
`\T‘ith
`that of
`the
`p185-low—expressing
`control
`435.1160:
`435.neo.pool, and parental MDA-MB-435 cells using
`
`MDA435 transfectants
`_
`8
`q‘
`O
`C
`a)
`
`‘—
`a:
`m
`
`N
`-
`a:
`m
`
`a;
`m
`
`the clonogenic assays (Cree et al., 1995). Cells were
`
`

`

`Taxol resistance of p185-overexpressing breast cancer cells
`D Yu et al
`
`1361
`
`(Figure 2a). The
`and parental MDA-MB—435 cells
`difference in Taxol
`sensitivity between the 435.eB
`transfectants and the control 435.neo, 435.neo.pool
`and parental MDA—MB—435 cells were statistically
`highly significant
`(P<0.00012). We also compared
`the Taxol sensitivities of the 435.eB transfectants and
`
`the control cell lines using the CellTiter96TM AQ Non-
`Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega Corp)
`(Promega, 1991). The Taxol IC50 values of the p185-
`overexpressing 435.eB transfectants from three inde-
`pendent experiments were significantly higher than that
`of the control 435.neo, 435.neo.pool and the parental
`MDA-MB—435 cells (P<0.01), ranging from a 4.2— to
`9-fold
`increase
`(data not
`shown). These
`results
`demonstrate that overexpression of p185 can lead to
`increased resistance to Taxol in breast cancer cells.
`
`Interestingly, several spontaneous revertants of the
`435.eB transfectants appeared after ~25 passages that
`lost the transfected c—erbB—Z gene and express very low
`levels of p185 protein (Figure 1b, eB.1R named for
`revertants derived from the 435.eB1 transfectants and
`eB.2R for revertants derived from the 435.eB.2 transfec-
`
`tants). When we tested the Taxol chemosensitivity of the
`plSS-low-expressing spontaneous revertants, these rever-
`tants demonstrated similar Taxol sensitivity as the control
`435.neo.1 cells,
`i.e.,
`these revertants have lost Taxol
`resistance (Figure 213). These data demonstrate that the
`increased Taxol resistance in the 435.eB transfectants was
`
`indeed the result of p185 overexpression.
`To examine whether increased Taxol resistance of the
`
`435.eB transfectants was associated with changes in cell
`proliferation characteristics, we measured the doubling
`times and S-phase fractions of the pl85-overexpressing
`435.eB transfectants and the plSS-low—expressing con—
`trol cells. No statistically significant difference was
`observed among the Taxol-resistant 435.eB transfec-
`tants and the Taxol-sensitive control cells (Table 1).
`These
`findings
`indicate
`that
`the
`increased Taxol
`resistance of the 435.eB transfectants did not result
`
`from any differences in growth rate and DNA synthesis
`rate but was the result of p185 overexpression.
`been
`Since overexpression of
`c-erbB-Z/neu has
`reported to induce transformation in NIH3T3 cells
`(Hudziak et al., 1987), we investigated whether the
`increased Taxol resistance is associated with oncogenic
`transformation. The neu-transformed NIH3T3 cells
`
`(EJ-ras),
`res—transformed NIH3T3 cells
`(B104-1-1),
`and the parental nontransformed NIH3T3 cells were
`examined for their sensitivity to Taxol (Figure 2c). The
`parental NIH3T3 cells were sensitive to Taxol. The
`neu—transformed B104-1-1 cells were highly resistant to
`Taxol, which is consistent with our observations in
`p185-overexpressing 435.eB transfectants. However, the
`ras-transformed EJ-ras cells were sensitive to Taxol as
`
`the parental NIH3T3 cells. These results indicate that
`the increased resistance to Taxol in lieu-transformed
`
`NIH3T3 cells and p185-overexpressing breast cancer
`cells is associated with c—erbB—Z/neu gene expression
`but not a general effect of oncogenic transformation.
`
`Overexpression 0fp185 can confer intrinsic Taxol
`resistance via mdr-l independent mechanisms
`
`is a
`The mdr-I gene-encoded P-glycoprotein (p170)
`transmembrane transport protein that functions as an
`ATP-dependent drug-efllux pump, reduces drug accu-
`
`
`
`grown in the presence of different concentrations of
`Taxol, and the percentages of viable cell clones relative
`to the drug-free control were quantitated. The 435.eB
`transfectants demonstrated increased resistance
`to
`
`Taxol killing than the control 435.neo, 435.neo.pool,
`
`MDA-MB—435
`
`435mm
`
`435.neo.pool
`
`435.1231
`
`435.5132
`435.eB.3
`
`435.cB.4
`
`0.0001
`
`0.001
`
`0.01
`
`0.1
`
`Taxol Concentration (pg/ml)
`
`'5
`>"-1
`
`2
`:1
`CD
`
`U S
`
`-1
`N
`.:
`:3
`t
`U)
`
`B F
`
`b
`
`0
`
`>1
`
`
`
`""u""
`
`435.neo
`
`—o— 435.eB.l.R
`
`—o— 435.eB.2.R
`
`‘
`
`.
`“D
`1‘
`
`‘
`
`0.01
`
`0.1
`
`1
`
`10
`
`100
`
`Taxol Concentration (11M)
`
`NIH3T3
`
`Elm
`
`—0— 1310411
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0 0
`
`.001
`
`100
`
`_ 75
`C“
`>I—
`.1
`:1
`U:
`
`50
`
`0.01
`
`Oil
`
`1
`
`IO
`
`100
`
`5°
`
`25
`
`00
`
`.001
`
`Taxol Concentration (uM)
`
`(21) p185 overexpressing 435.eB transfectants are more
`Figure 2
`to Taxol
`than the MDA-MB-435,
`435.neo,
`and
`resistant
`435.neo.pool cells that express basal level of p185. Cytotoxicities
`of Taxol
`in the indicated MDA—MB-435 cells or transfectants
`were determined by clonogenic assays and were shown as Taxol
`dose-response curves of the indicated cell lines. The means of at
`least
`three independent experiments were plotted.
`(b) Similar
`Taxol sensitivities among the 435.neo.l control cells,
`the eBilR
`and eB.2R revertants. Taxol dose-response curves were deter-
`mined by using the CellTiter96TM AQ Non-Radioactive Cell
`Proliferation Assay (Promega Corp) and were averaged from
`three independent experiments. (c) Increased Taxol resistance in
`new—transformed NIH3T3 cells (BlO4-l-1) but not
`in parental
`NIH3T3 cells nor
`in Ins-transformed NIH3T3 cells
`(EJ—ras).
`Taxol dose-response curves were determined as in (b) and were
`averaged from three independent experiments
`
`
`
`

`

`1362
`
`Taxol resistance of p185-overexpressing breast cancer cells
`D Yu et al
`
`MDA435 transfectants
`
`m
`a
`<
`0
`2
`
`_
`8
`Q.-

`and
`
`“.

`GED
`
`cg
`
`m
`m
`
`2
`(D
`
`2
`a)
`
`m
`I
`2'2
`(I)
`
`13170 fi~~—’“n‘-- .
`
`Fibronectin ‘—' -— ;- ~—-— *- “‘
`
`"—
`
`”'
`
`p170|eve|
`
`1.0
`
`0.9
`
`1.1
`
`0.9 1.10.8 1.2
`
`12.2
`
`the mdr—I—encoded
`Immunoblot analysis for
`(Top):
`Figure 3
`p170 proteins in the cell lysates of the indicated cell lines. 100 11g
`of protein from each sample was electrophoresed on 6% SDS~
`PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose filters. The filters were
`incubated with the primary polyclonal antibody against p170
`(Oncogene Sci. 1110.). Position of the p170 is indicated on the left.
`(Middle): Immunoblot analysis for fibronectin as internal loading
`controls. The p170 signals on the same filter used in Figure 3 (a)
`were stripped away and the filter was re—hybridized with anti-
`fibroncctin antibodies (Oncogene Science, Inc). Position of the
`fibronectin protein is
`indicated on the left. The p170 and
`fibronectin protein levels were quantified by personal
`laser
`densitometor. The
`relative amount of mdr—J—encoded p170
`expression levels in each cell
`line was normalized by fibronectin
`level
`in the corresponding cell
`line and were indicated in panel
`(Bottom)
`
`resistance to a
`mulation, and can therefore confer
`(Moscow and
`variety of chemotherapeutic drugs
`Cowan,'l988; Nooter and Herweijer, 1991). Recently,
`a statistically significant association has been reported
`between the expression of the c-erbB-Z/neu-encoded
`p185 and the mdr—I-encoded p170 in mammary
`carcinomas
`(Schneider
`cl
`(1].,
`1994). We therefore
`investigated whether mdr-I may
`be
`involved
`in
`increased Taxol
`resistance of p185 overexpressing
`breast
`cancer
`cells. We performed Western blot
`analysis on the MDA—MB—435, 435.neo, 435.neo.pool
`cells and the 435.eB transfectants using the polyclonal
`anti-human P-glycoprotein antibody raised against the
`P-glycoprotein C-terminal cytoplasmic domain (Onco—
`gene Science, Inc.) (Figure 3, top). A very low level of
`the mdr-I-encoded P-glycoprotein was detected in the
`MDA-MB—435 cells and the levels of
`the mdr-I-
`
`pl85—overexpressing 435.eB
`the
`in
`encoded p170
`similar
`to
`the MDA-MB—435,
`transfectants were
`435.neo, and 435.neo.pool cells that expressed basal
`levels of p185. Western blot analysis on the panel of
`transfectants were also performed using anti-fibronec-
`tin monoclonal antibodies (Oncogene Science, Inc.) as
`internal
`loading control
`(Figure 3, middle) and the
`p170 and fibronectin protein levels were quantified by
`laser densitometor. The mdr-I-encoded p170 expression
`levels
`in
`the
`transfectants were
`normalized
`by
`fibronectin levels for quantitative comparison which
`demonstrated that
`the relative amount of mdr-I—
`
`encoded p170 are very similar among the C—erbB—2-
`transfectants and control cells (Figure 3, bottom). The
`results indicated that c-erbB-Z did not up~regulate mdr-
`]~encoded p170 expression in 435.eB transfectants,
`suggesting that mdr-I may not be involved in increased
`Taxol
`resistance of the p185—overexpressing 435.cB
`transfectants.
`
`
`
`in
`the involvement of mdr—I
`To further rule out
`Taxol
`resistance of 435.eB transfectants, we used
`thioradazine, a chemosensitizing agent or multidrug—
`resistance reversing agent that can block P-glycoprotein
`function, on these 435.cB transfectants. We evaluated
`whether these 435.eB transfectants can be sensitized to
`
`Taxol by the mdr—J blocker treatment. Non-cytotoxic
`dose of thioridazine (1 rig/ml) has been shown to
`effectively block p170 function and restore drug
`sensitivity for multidrug—resistant sarcoma 8180 cell
`by binding to P-glycoprotein (Efferth and Volm, 1993).
`Therefore 1—2 rig/ml of thioridazine, which did no‘
`yield significant cytotoxicity on MDA-MB-435 cells
`(< 10% reduction of cell survival), were tested for tht
`Taxol sensitization effect. Compared to Taxol alone
`thioradazine plus Taxol did not
`lead to remarkable
`increase of Taxol sensitivity in either the pl85-lou
`expressing MDA-MB-435 cells or the p185-overexpres-
`sing 435.eB2 and 435.eB4 transfectants (Figure 4a,
`.-
`and d). This phenomenon was also observed over a
`range of Taxol doses (0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 nM)
`and on other cell
`lines, where thioridazine had ro
`differential sensitization effect on 435.neo, 435.neo.pool
`cells and other 435.eB transfectants (data not show).
`In contrast, 172 ug/ml thioridazine had striking Taxol
`sensitization effect on the CHO.VBR1.5-l cells (Figu.e
`4b),
`that has
`been reported to be
`resistant
`to
`vinblastine due
`to overexpression of mdr-encoded
`p170 (Kuo er (1]., 1994). Taken together, lack of Ta: )1
`sensitization by thioridazine on the Taxol-resistant
`435.eB transfectants was due to the low levels of
`
`p170 expression and function in these cells. Therefore,
`mdr-I is not involved in the increased Taxol resistance
`of the 435.eB transfectants.
`
`tumors of pet-“ems
`
`Discussion
`
`p185
`the C—erbB—Z/neu-encoded
`Overexpression of
`protein has been found in many types of human
`cancers and has been correlated with poor clinical
`outcome in breast and ovarian cancers (Hung, 1968;
`Slamon e!
`(1]., 1989). Here, we demonstrated “‘at
`overexpression of p185 can confer resistance to Taxol
`in human breast cancer cell
`lines.
`It
`is notable .iiat
`Taxol has attracted intense interest because of its
`antitumor activity in
`drug—refractory ovarian and
`breast
`carcinomas. However,
`about
`30—40% Of
`patients do not respond to Taxol
`treatment (Cheva:
`lier er (1]., 1995; Holmes er 0]., 1991). Overexpressitn Of
`the c-erbB—2/neu gene has been found in about 20-
`30% of breast cancers and our results indicate that
`breast cancers that overexpress p185 will not respond
`well to Taxol. Interestingly, we have examined 'i’axol
`sensitivities of seven breast cancer cells lines establ’llt’fd
`from different patients using clonogenic assays and
`found that those c-erbB-Z overexpressing breast t. .1CCI‘
`cell lines are significantly more resistant to Taxol than
`those c-erbB-Z low~expressing breast cancer cell
`lines
`(data not shown). These findings may provide one
`explanation on why some breast cancer patients (10 ml
`respond to Taxol
`treatment. This important
`is
`16
`15
`currently being further pursued by examining whether
`overexpression of p185
`correlates with
`increased
`chemoresistance in primary breast
`
`

`

`
`
`(1].,
`trials (Holmes er
`enrolled in the Taxol Clinical
`1991). Nevertheless, our results agree with a previous
`clinical study where p185 overexpressing breast tumors
`were
`found
`less
`responsive
`to CMF-containing
`
`than those with a normal
`chemotherapy regimens
`amount of the gene product (Gusterson ez‘
`(11., 1992).
`Therefore, p185 expression level may be a potential
`predictive factor that can be used to select patients who
`
`Taxol resistance of p185-overexpressing breast cancer cells
`D Yu et aI
`1363
`
`MDA-MB-435
`
`CHO.VBR1.5-1
`
`a Thioridazine, 0
`
`[25
`
`Thioridazine.0
`
`.
`.
`.
`El ThioridazmeJug/ml
`
`7
`I
`‘
`E Th‘
`iorida21nc,kug/ml
`
`
`
`xxx
`
`(t
`x:\
`3.)
`\(x
`xxx
`\(x
`\I\
`:3:
`\
`«I
`\:‘\
`\ Ix
`\(\.
`‘\:\
`K!\
`“A. N
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_
`N
`.>
`;
`h
`CE
`Q

`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0
`
`E3 Thioridazinefipglml
`
`El
`
`Thioridazine, 211g/ml
`
`
`:\:\
`Ix!»
`xx"
`l“)
`xx)
`(xix
`N \
`(xxx
`3;
`x \.
`:9
`’\"\
`Ixfx
`’\l\
`’\,\
`’\’\
`/\/N
`
`
`
`x I
`‘s
`'K
`(\l‘s
`3‘;
`'\ \
`jg
`"sx‘.
`[\J\
`"u/‘s
`’\x\
`"x/‘a.
`I’\('\
`
`O
`0.05
`TaxolmM)
`
`0
`
`5
`Tax01(HM)
`
`10
`
`435_eB,2
`
`435.eB.4
`
`d
`
`7“
`I:
`>
`L:
`5
`CI)
`g
`
`125
`
`'00
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0
`
`c
`
`%Survival
`
`125
`
`l ()0
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`125
`
`l ()0
`
`%Survival
`
`lthrlddllnC, O
`
`a ThiOTidaZinC.
`
`lug/ml
`
`ThiOFidflZine, Eng/ml
`
`\\\\\\\x\\x\\
`
`Thioridazinc, O
`
`E21
`
`Thioriduzine, lug/ml
`
`Thioridazine, 2pg/ml
`
`'\ix
`"5\\)\,
`
`xx\\\\\\.rxxxw'xfxl.’\\~\x\\\
`
`\.
`
`x
`
`xx\x
`
`.
`\.
`a.
`
`aK
`
`_\a.
`\
`
`\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`III/IIIIJIIIIIIIII‘II.’
`
`\\\\\x\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`{III/JIIJIIIIZIIIIIII
`
`
`
`
`0
`
`0.05
`TaxolQrM)
`
`0.1
`
`0
`
`0-05
`TaxolflilVI)
`
`0~1
`
`(a), (c) and (d). Thioridazine had no significant Taxol sensitization efTect either on the parental MDA-MB—435 cells or on
`Figure 4
`the p185-overexpressing 435.6B2 and 435.eB4 transfectants (b) Thioridazine had dramatic Taxol sensitization effect on the p170—
`overexpressing CHO.VBR1,5-l cells. The indicated cells (~2 X 104) in 0.1 ml culture medium were plated onto 96—well plates. 24 h
`later, cells were grown in either 100 ,ul fresh medium as drug-free control; or 100 ,Lll fresh medium containing Thioridazine (l or
`2 rig/ml); or 100 [11 fresh medium containing different concentrations of Taxol; or lOO ,ul fresh medium containing thioridazme plus
`Taxol. Cells were incubated for 72 h, and the percentage of cells surviving from each group were determined by usmg the
`CellTiter96TM AQ Non—Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega Corp)._Taxol concentrations used in these assays were
`chosen to be close to the IC50 concentrations determined by using the CellTiter96rM AQ Non—Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay,
`which were 0.05 or 0.1 itM for the breast cancer cells. 5 or 10 11M for the CHO cells
`
`
`
`

`

`
`1364
`
`Taxol resistance of p185-overexpressing breast cancer cells
`D Yu et al
`
`are likely to respond to certain chemotherapy regimens.
`A correlation between chemoresistancc and p185
`expression and cell proliferation characteristics has
`been reported in non-small cell lung cancer cell
`lines
`established from different patients (Tsai et al., 1996).
`However,
`the increased Taxol
`resistance in p185-
`overexpressing 435.eB breast cancer cells was clearly
`not accompanied by significant differences
`in cell
`proliferation characteristics, which suggests that over-
`expression of p185 in breast cancer cells may confer
`Taxol resistance via novel mechanisms. Increased drug
`resistance has been previously reported in NIH3T3
`cells transformed by the c-myc or ras oncogenes (Niimi
`er al., 1991), whereas our experiments demonstrated
`that
`increased Taxol
`resistance was
`an intrinsic
`
`property associated with c—erbB-Z/neu gene expression
`but not
`a phenotype
`associated with oncogenic
`transformation.
`
`Although the p185-overexpressing 435.eB transfec—
`tants demonstrated increased Taxol
`resistance com-
`pared with
`the MDA—MB-435,
`435.neo,
`and
`435.11eo.pool cells that expressed basal levels of p185,
`the levels of mdr-I—encoded P-glycoprotein p170 are
`similar among these cells.
`In addition,
`the Indr-I
`blocker
`thioridazine were not more
`effective on
`sensitizing the p185-overexpressing 435.eB transfec-
`tants
`to Taxol
`treatment
`than the MDA-MB-435
`
`parental cells. The cognate subtle increase (4710%)
`in Taxol sensitivity by the mdr-I blocker thioridazine in
`both cell
`lines are consistent with the similarly low
`p170 levels of these cell
`lines. These results clearly
`indicate that overexpression of c-erbB—Z/neu-encoded
`
`References
`
`Akiyama T, Sudo C, Ogawara H, Toyoshima K and
`Yamamoto T. (1986). Science, 232, 164471646.
`Arteaga CL, Winnier AR, Poirier MC, Lopez-Larraza DM,
`Shawver LK, Hurd SD and Stewart SJ. (1994). Cancer
`Res., 54, 3758—3765.
`Bargmann CI, Hung M-C and Weinberg RA. (1986). Nature,
`319, 226—230.
`Chevalier B, Fumoleau P, Kerbrat P, Dieras V, Roche H,
`Krakowski I, Azli N, Bayssas M, Lentz MA and Van
`Glabbeke M. (1995). J. ofClin. Oncol, 13, 314~322
`Coussens L, Yang-Feng TL, Liao Y-C, Chen E, Gray A,
`McGrath J, Seeburg PH, Libermann TA, Schlessinger J,
`Francke U, Levinson A and Ullrich A. (1985). Science,
`230,1132~1139.
`Cree IA, Pazzagli M, Mini E, Mazzei T, Hunter EM,
`Sutherland LA, Pinzani P, Gerli A and Andreotti PE.
`(1995). Anti-Cancer Drugs, 6, 398—404.
`Efierth T and Volm M. (1993). Cancer Lett., 70, l97~202.
`Gusterson BA, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Price KN, Save—
`Soderborgh J, Anbazhagan R, Styles J, Rudenstam C-M,
`Golouh R, Reed R, Martinez—Tello F, Tiltman A,
`Torhorst J, Grigolato P, Bettelhcim R, Neville AM,
`Burki K, Castiglione M, Collins J, Lindtner J, Senn H-J
`and Ludwig IBCSG. (1992). J. Clin. Oncol, 10, 1049—
`1056.
`
`Hancock MC, Langton BC, Chan T, Toy P, Monahan JJ,
`Mischak RP and Shawver LK. (1991). Cancer Res., 51,
`4575~4580.
`
`Harris JR, Lippman ME, Veronesi U and Willett W. (1992).
`N. Engl. J. Meal, 327, 319—328, 390—398, 473—480.
`
`did not upregulate ma’r-I
`435.eB cells
`in
`p185
`expression or
`activate mdr-l
`function. Therefore,
`p185 overexpression can confer increased resistance to
`Taxol via mdr—J independent pathways/mechanisms.
`Our data indicated that p185 overexpression can
`confer Taxol resistance to breast cancer cells indepen-
`dent from cell cycle characteristics, oncogenic trans—
`formation and ma’r-I mechanisms, we need to consider
`other possible mechanisms underlying Taxol resistance
`in plSS-overexpressing breast cancer cells. We are
`currently
`exploring
`the
`possible
`involvement
`of
`different mechanisms in p185—induced Taxol resistance
`using the 435.eB transfectants.
`In addition, we are
`investigating whether p185 overexpression in breast
`cancer cells can lead to increased resistance to other
`chemotherapeutic agents frequently used for treatment
`of breast cancers. Our study will provide valuable
`information for
`the development of new treatment
`strategies that can be applied clinically to breast cancer
`patients whose
`tumors overexpress p185
`and to
`significantly improve the clinical outcome of these
`patients.
`
`Acknowledgements
`We thank Dr M Tien Kuo for generously providing us witli
`the CHO.VBR1.5-l cells. This research was supported by
`DHHS Grants CA60488 (DY), CA58880, CA60856 (MCH)
`from the NIH.
`
`Holmes FA, Walters RS, Theriault RL, Forman AD,
`Newton LK, Raber MN, Buzdar AU, Frye DK an'i
`Hortobagyi GN. (1991). J. Natl. Cancer Inst, 83, 17977
`1805.
`
`Hudziak RM, Schlessinger J and Ullrich A. (1987). Proc.
`Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 715977163.
`Hung M. (1988). Cancer Bull, 40, 300~303.
`Kraus MH, Popescu NC, Amsbaugh SC and King CII.
`(1987). EMBO J., 6, 605—610.
`Kuo MT, Vyas RC, Jiang L-X and Hittleman WN. (199+).
`Mol. Cell. Biol, 14, 520275211.
`Lacroix H, Iglehart JD, Skinner MA and Kraus MH. (1981).
`Oncogene, 4, 1457 151.
`Moscow JA and Cowan KH. (1988). J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 00,
`14~20.
`
`Muss HB, Thor AD, Berry DA, Kutc T, Lin ET, Koerncr F,
`Cirrincione CT, Budman DR, Wood WC, Barcos M Md
`Henderson IC. (1994). N. Engl. J. Merl, 330, 1260— 1266.
`Niimi S, Nakagawa K, Yokota J, Tsunokawa Y, Nishic K,
`Terashima Y, Shibuya M, Terada M and Saijo N. (1991).
`Br. J. Cancer, 63, 237—241.
`Nooter K and Herweijer H. (1991). Br. J. Cancer, 63, 663.
`Pietras RJ, Fendly BM, Chazin VR, Pegram MD, Howell SB
`and Slamon DJ. (1994). Oncogene, 9, 182971838.
`Promega. (1991). Technical Bulletin, Promega Carp. Mt..li—
`son, WI: Promega Corp., 169,.
`Schneider
`J, Rubio M-P, Barbazan M-J, Rodriguez-
`Escudero FJ, Seizinger BR and Castresana JS. (1994). J
`Natl. Cancer Inst, 86, 850—854.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A and
`McGuire WL. (1987). Science, 235, 177g 182.
`Slamon DJ, GOdolphin W, Jones LA, Holt JA, Wong SG,
`Keith DE, Levin WJ, Stuart SG, Udove J, Ullrich A and
`McGuire WL. (1989). Science, 244, 7077712.
`Stern DF, Heflernan PA and Weinberg RA. (1986). Mol.
`Cell. Biol, 6, 172971740.
`Tauchi K, Hori S, ltoh H, Osamura RY, Tokuda Y and
`Tajima T.
`(1989). Vil‘C/lOWS Arch. A Pat/10!. Anat.
`Hisropar/iol,, 416, 65 773.
`Tsai C-M, Chang K-T, Perng R-P, Mitsudomi T, Chen M-H,
`Kadoyama C and Gazdar AF. (1993). J. Natl. Cancer
`11151., 85, 8977901.
`Tsai C-M, Yu D, Chang K-T, Wu L-H, Perng PR-P, Ibrahim
`NK and Hung M-C. (1995). J. Natl. Cancer 11751., 87, 682~
`684.
`
`1365
`
`Taxol resistance of p185-overexpressing breast cancer cells
`D Yu et a1
`
`Tsai CM, Chang KT, Wu LH, Chen JY, Gazdar AFTM,
`Chen MH and Perng RP. (1996). Cancer Res., 56, 206g
`209.
`
`Wall ME and Wani MC. (1995). Cancer Res., 55, 753—760.
`Wani MC, Taylor HL, Wall ME, Coggon P and McPhail AT.
`(1971). J. Am. Chem. $00., 93, 2325—2327.
`Yamamoto T, lkawa S, Akiyama T, Samba K, Nomura N,
`Miyajima N, Saito T and Toyoshima K. (1986). Nature,
`319, 230—234.
`Yu D and Hung MC. (1991). Oncogene, 6, 199171996.
`Yu D, Wang S—S, Dulski KM, Tsai C-M, Nicolson GL and
`Hung M-C. (1994). Cancer Res., 54, 326073266.
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket