throbber
1420
`
`THE LANCET
`
`EC50 (nmol/L) AND Emax EXPRESSED AS PERCENTAGE OF
`MAXIMUM CONTRACTILE RESPONSE TO POTASSIUM,
`100 mmol/L*
`
`*Mean (SE) shown, n=6-11, tsubcutaneous.
`
`The recommended dose of subcutaneously administered
`ergotamine is 10 to 48 times lower than for subuctaneous
`sumatriptan2-4 (table). However, the 100-fold higher potency,
`combined with the 2-fold higher maximum effect, as well as the
`much longer duration of action of ergotamine, suggests that, in
`general, the cardiac liability of ergotamine is higher than that of
`sumatriptan. Both drugs are contraindicated in patients with known
`coronary artery disease. Possibly, the oral administration of
`sumatriptan-if feasible-would lead to a less rapid rise in plasma
`concentrations, which could be safer in patients who may be at risk
`from coronary side-effects.
`
`Department of Pharmacology,
`Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,
`Erasmus University Rotterdam,
`3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
`
`WILLEM A. BAX
`PRAMOD R. SAXENA
`
`1101
`
`Contractile effect of sumatriptan in absence of U46619 (open
`circles, n = 4), and in presence of EC,o concentration (filled
`circles, n = 4), EC,o concentration (open triangles), or ECso
`(filled
`triangles)
`concentration
`of U46619 on non-
`atherosclerotic epicardial coronary arteries.
`Specimens were obtained from 4 patients aged 25, 29, 43, and
`receiving
`54 years,
`heart
`for cardiomyopathy.
`transplantation
`Experiments were done in duplicate in vessels from each patient.
`(Initial response U46619concentrations shown by different starting
`points for each curve on the y axis.) M = mol/L.
`
`of abrogated nitric oxide release. These mechanisms could be of
`pathophysiological importance in vessels affected by atherosclerotic
`disease, since we have shown that areas immediately distal to
`atheromas are hyperreactive to sumatriptan.1 The possibility exists
`that some patients receiving sumatriptan could have newly formed
`yet undetected atheroma, with an associated area of vascular
`hyperreactivity. Care should be taken when giving this drug to
`patients with coronary risk factors.
`The physiological role of 5-HT1-like receptors remains unclear,
`but in certain circumstances these receptors might mediate
`pathophysiological events in the coronary circulation.
`Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,
`National Heart and Lung Institute,
`Heart Science Centre,
`Harefield Hospital,
`Middlesex UB9 6JH, UK
`
`A. H. CHESTER
`G. S. O’NEIL
`M. H. YACOUB
`
`1. Chester AH, Martin GR, Bodelsson, et al. 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor profile in
`healthy and diseased human epicardial coronary arteries. Cardiovasc Res 1990; 24:
`932-37.
`2. Chester AH, Allen SP, Tadjkarimi S, Yacoub MH. Interaction between thromboxane
`A2 and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes in human coronary arteries.
`Circulation 1993; 87: 874-80.
`
`SIR,-Dr Ottervanger and colleagues prudently advise caution in
`the use of sumatriptan in patients with chest pain or "tightness of
`the chest" after use of sumatriptan. As they mention, myocardial
`ischaemia and infarction have also been recorded after ergotamine,l
`an antimigraine drug that has been used for many decades.
`However, the fact that their particular patient had not shown signs
`of myocardial ischaemia after ergotamine, prompts us to put in a
`word of caution.
`We compared the contractile effects in the human isolated
`coronary artery of sumatriptan and the non-selective 5-HT-
`receptor agonist ergotamine, and also of serotonin. The right
`coronary artery segments were obtained from 16 heart-beating
`organ donors who died of non-cardiac disorders (9 male, 7 female;
`aged 1-49 years). Hearts were provided by the Rotterdam Heart
`Valve Bank (Bio Implant Services Foundation/Eurotransplant
`Foundation) after removal of the aortic and pulmonary valves for
`homograft
`transplantation.
`Tension
`recorded
`valve
`was
`isometrically in organ baths containing oxygenated Kreb’s solution.
`The ECo and maximum effect (Emax) ofthe two antimigraine drugs
`and of serotonin show (table) that ergotamine was about 100 times
`more potent than sumatriptan. Moreover, the Emax of ergotamine
`was twice that of sumatriptan.
`
`1. Galer BS, Lipton RB, Solomona S, et al. Myocardial ischemia related to ergot
`alkaloids: a case report and literature review. Headache 1991; 31: 446-50.
`2. Perrin VL. Clinical pharmacokinetics of ergotamine in migraine and cluster headache.
`Clin Pharmacokin 1985; 10: 334-52.
`3. Farmacotherapeutisch
`Kompas
`1992.
`Ziekenfondsraad, 1992: 288-301.
`4. The Subcutaneous Sumatriptan International Study Group. Treatment of migraine
`attacks with sumatriptan. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 316-21.
`
`The
`
`Netherlands:
`
`Amstelveen,
`
`Tumour HER2 protein in breast cancer and
`family history
`SiR,—The HER2 gene, located on the long arm of chromosome
`17, codes for a protein with the characteristics of a growth factor
`receptor.1,2 The ligand may belong to a family of proteins called
`heregulins.3 HER2 protein overexpression in breast cancers is
`associated with poor prognosis.4 Moreover, HER2 overexpression
`is positively correlated with inflammatory tumours, higher tumour
`mitotic activity, high tumour grade, large tumour size, and young
`age. HER2 overexpression is negatively correlated with tumour
`oestrogen and progesterone receptor content. We report that high
`tumour HER2 protein is also associated with a family history of
`breast cancer.
`We measured HER2 protein in 20 women who had breast
`cancers excised in our centre. HER2 protein in the tumours was
`measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)6
`preferable
`which,
`quantitative,
`being
`be
`to
`may
`immunohistochemistry
`blotting,
`which
`western
`are
`or
`semiquantitative .6 All assays were done by Dianon Systems,
`Stratford, Connecticut.
`HER2 concentrations were significantly higher in women with a
`family history of breast cancer (p=00025, two-tailed Mann-
`Whitney U, figure). The 10 women with family history were
`predominantly post-menopausal (mean age 64-4 [SE 3 1] vs 57 [4-7]
`for the other 10; not significantly different, t-test). There was no
`significant difference in tumour DNA index between the two
`groups (1-13 [0’08] vs 1-28 [0-12]). Of the 10 women with a family
`history ofbreast cancer, 4 had a first-degree relative with the disease
`(mother or sister); the other 6 had a second-degree relative with
`breast cancer (aunts, cousins, or a niece).
`A familial breast-ovarian cancer gene, BRCAI, has been
`localised to the long arm of chromosome 17.7,8 This gene,
`associated with breast cancer in women under age 45, is not the
`HER2 gene.2 In addition, there is evidence implicating at least two
`genes on the short arm of chromosome 17 in breast cancer
`carcinogenesis.9 Hospira v. Genentech
`IPR2017-00737
`Genentech Exhibit 2022
`
`

`

`THE LANCET
`
`1421
`
`In African countries, low birthweight is twice as common as in
`western populations. 15% or more of infants lie below the 5th
`centile of growth, as indicated by US National Children’s Health
`Study reference standardsl-reaching 25-40% in preschool and
`schoolchildren. Nevertheless, these conditions seem to inhibit
`subsequent cardiovascular disease. In black South African adults,
`coronary heart disease (CHD) is absent in rural dwellers,
`and remains rare in urban dwellers, despite the facts that a
`quarter have raised cholesterol concentrations,over half the men
`smoke, and hypertension frequency is higher than in the white
`population. However, with the slight rise in socioeconomic
`status and its sequelae, the prevalence of diabetes, by contrast
`with its near absence in the past, is as high in elderly rural blacks
`as in whites.’ In both populations the poor and less poor are
`affected.
`Historically, in western populations up to the turn ofthe century,
`most people were very poor. Undoubtedly, low birthweight and
`malnutrition diseases such as rickets were far more common than
`now. Yet until the 1920s CHD was very uncommon: in the UK it
`was regarded as "a rare disease in hospitals".** Similarly, in the
`USA, when Paul Dudley White was young (in the 1920s), records at
`Massachusetts General Hospital did not reveal "more than a rare
`case of CHD" among poor people, although cases did occur among
`the well-to-do.6 We therefore suggest that adverse factors at birth
`and immediately after manifest their long-term pathogenicity, with
`respect to CHD and diabetes, principally in a westernised
`setting-higher energy high-fat diets, smoking practice, and
`diminished physical activity.
`What can we do toward clarification? Unfortunately, no
`anthropometric data at infancy are available for middle-aged black
`adults. As second best, we are seeking to learn from individual black
`patients with CHD and diabetes to what extent their early family life
`was very poor, average, or better off.
`
`Human Biochemistry Research Unit,
`School of Pathology,
`University of Witwatersrand;
`and the South African Institute
`for Medical Research,
`Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
`
`A. R. P. WALKER
`B. F. WALKER
`
`1. Yach D, Coetzee N, Hugo-Hamman CT, Fisher SA, Kibel MA. Identifying children
`at risk in peri-urban Cape Town. S Afr J Epidemiol Infect 1990; 5: 6-8.
`2. Walker ARP, Walker BF, Walker AJ. Slower growth and other deficits in South
`African black schoolchildren aged 12 years: is dietary supplementation mandatory?
`Int Clin Nutr Rev 1989; 9: 76-83.
`3. Walker ARP, Walker BF. Coronary disease in blacks in underdeveloped populations.
`Am Heart J 1985; 109: 1410.
`4. Walker ARP, Walker BF. Diabetes prevalence in elderly rural blacks in South Africa.
`S Afr J Food Sci Nutr 1991; 3: 68-71.
`5. McCrae T. Osler’s principles and practice of medicine. London: Appleton, 1912: 836.
`6. White PD. The cardiologist enlists the epidemiologist. Am J Public Health 1957; 47:
`1-3.
`
`SIR,-Professor Barker and colleagues, in their review of the
`effects of fetal nutrition on cardiovascular disease in adult life, risk
`seriously misleading clinicians and other non-specialists about the
`effects of maternal undemutrition in pregnancy. Their long-term,
`retrospective, epidemiological studies are a valuable stimulus to
`further reflection, but I believe that their ideas on possible
`physiological
`mechanisms
`misconceived
`and
`be
`may
`counterproductive.
`Intrauterine growth retardation may be mainly caused by
`maternal undernutrition and excessive physical labour, as well as
`closely spaced pregnancies and disease, in parts of the developing
`world, but there is no evidence that the same is true in industrialised
`countries such as the UK. The test is whether supplementary
`feeding of pregnant women in the UK increases birthweight, and it
`does not. Smallness for dates for our women has a multitude of
`causes, many of them unknown, and there are many known
`non-nutritional factors in the environment related to lifestyle--but
`undemutrition is not known to be among them.1
`Even in communities in which undemutrition is a contributing
`factor, this factor can only be shown to operate in the last trimester,
`and has not been shown in man in early embryonic life or in
`mid-pregnancy. It is not helpful to assert that embryonic and
`trophoblast growth are influenced by the concentration of nutrients,
`
`of Breast Cancer
`
`HER2 protein in tumours of women with and without family
`history of breast cancer.
`Mean (SE): 742 (113) and 2607 (776) ng/mg, respectively, n=100
`per group.
`
`The association of family history of breast cancer and raised
`tumour HER2 protein suggests that another gene, linked to
`post-menopausal familial breast cancer, may reside on the long arm
`ofchromosome 17. Since there are few mutations of the HER2 gene
`in breast cancer,s the gene in question might lie in a nearby region of
`the chromosome which affects HER2 expression. It would be
`worthwhile to try to correlate the high HER2 concentrations and
`family history with a chromosome 17 marker. Linkage studies with
`the marker might then further localise the gene.
`
`Departments of Radiation Oncology
`and Surgery,
`Mount Sinai Medical Centre,
`New York, New York 10029, USA
`
`STEVEN LEHRER
`PATRICIA LEE
`PAUL TARTTER
`STEVEN BROWER
`
`1. Hoffman M. New clue found to oncogene’s role in breast cancer. Science 1992, 256:
`1129.
`2. Roberts L. Zeroing in on a breast cancer susceptibility gene. Science 1993; 259: 622-25.
`3. Holmes WE. Sliwkowski M, Akita RW, et al. Identification of heregulin, a specific
`activator of p185-erbB2. Science 1992; 256: 1205-10.
`4. Paik S, Burkhard E, Lippman ME. Clinical significance of erbB2 protein
`overexpression. In: Dickson RB, Lippman ME, eds. Genes, oncogenes, and
`hormones. Advances in cellular and molecular biology of breast cancer. Boston:
`Kluwer Academic, 1992: 181-91.
`5. Lofts FJ, Gullick WJ. c-erbB2 amplification and overexpression in human tumors. In:
`Dickson RB, Lippman ME, eds. Genes, oncogenes, and hormones. Advances in
`cellular and molecular biology of breast cancer. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1992:
`161-79.
`6. Carney WP, Hamer PJ, Petit D, et al. Detection and quantitation of the human neu
`oncoprotein. J Tumor Marker Oncol 1991; 6: 53-72.
`7. Hall JM, Lee MK, Newman B, et al. Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to
`chromosome 17q21. Science 1990; 250: 1684-89.
`8. Narod S, Feunteun J, Lynch HT, et al. Familial breast-ovarian cancer locus on
`chromosome 17q12-q23. Lancet 1991; 338: 82-83.
`9. Coles C, Thompson AM, Elder PA, et al. Evidence implicating at least two genes on
`chromosome 17p in breast carcinogenesis. Lancet 1990; 336: 761-63.
`
`Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in
`adult life
`SIR,-Professor Barker and colleagues’ findings (April 10, p 938)
`indicate that babies small at birth or during infancy have increased
`rates of cardiovascular disease and diabetes as adults.
`Living in juxtaposition with Africans, traditionally living and
`transitional, we are uncertain how much of their health/ill-health is
`regulated by genetic and environmental factors, dietary and
`non-dietary. African village children, equally poor and eating the
`same limited range of foodstuffs, show wide ranges in various
`indices (anthropometrical, biochemical, haematological, faecal pH),
`which are not fully explained by carefully assessed dietary intakes.
`Doubtless, factors of genetic origin, of very early childhood
`experience, and of differing individual reactivity to environmental
`factors are in operation.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket