throbber

`
`
`
`Proceedings
`
`Basic and Clinical Aspects of Breast Cancer
`
`A Special Conference of the
`American Association for Cancer Research
`
`Supported by a Generous Grant from the
`National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
`
`(N.I.E.H.S.)
`
`Qfie Keystone Resort
`Keystone, Co[orodo
`{Moron 7-12, 1997
`
`Conference Co-Cfloirpersons
`
`J. Carl Barrett
`
`Karen S. H. Antman
`
`N.I.E.H.S.
`Research Triangle Park, NC
`
`Columbia University
`New York, NY
`
`Mary-Claire King
`University of Washington
`Seattle, WA
`
`Page 001
`Page 001
`
`Genentech 2135
`Genentech 2135
`Hospira v. Genentech
`Hospira v. Genentech
`IPR2017-00737
`|PR2017-00737
`
`
`
`r
`
`,
`
`

`

`
`
`A-39
`
`THERAPEUTIC ADVANTAGE OF CHEMOTHERAPY DRUGS IN COMBINATION WITH RECOMBINANT,
`
`HUMANIZED, ANTI-HER-2/NEU MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY (rhuMAb HER-2) AGAINST HUMAN BREAST
`
`CANCER CELLS AND XENOGRAFI'S WITH HER-2/NEU OVEREXPRESSION
`
`Sheree Hsu. Mark Pegram, Richard Pietras. Malgorzata Beryt, and Dennis Siamon
`
`Division of Hematology-Oncology, UCLA School of Medicine. Los Angeles, CA 90095
`
`We have previously demonstrated a synergistic interaction between rhuMAb HER-2 and the cytotoxic drug
`
`cisplatin in human breast and ovarian cancer cells (Pietras, et al, Oncogene, 9: 1829-38, 1994). To
`
`characterize the nature of the interaction between rhuMAb HER-2 and other classes of cytotoxic drugs, we
`used multiple drug effect analysis (Chou, et al, Adv Enz Reg. 22: 27-55, 1984) to determine combination
`
`index values for drug/antibody combinations in an in vitro cytotoxicity assay. SKBR-S cells, human breast
`
`cancer cells with HER-e/neu amplification/overexpression, served as the target cell
`
`line in these
`
`experiments.
`
`In the cytotoxicity assay, rhuMAb HER-2 exhibited synergistic effects in combination with
`
`cisplatin, thiotepa, and etoposide. When used in combination with doxorubicin, taxol, or vinblastine, rhuMAb
`
`HER-2 had additive cytotoxic effects. One drug, 5-fluorouracil, was found to be antagonistic with rhuMAb
`
`HER-2 in vitro.
`
`In vivo studies were conducted in an athymic mouse model with HER-Zneu—transfected MCF-
`
`7 human breast cancer xenografts which,
`
`in contrast to SKBR-3 cells, are tumorigenic in athymic mice.
`
`Combinations of rhuMAb HER-2 plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate. etoposide, and
`
`vinblastine resulted in a significant reduction in xenograft volume compared to drug alone or rhuMAb HER-2
`
`alone controls (p<0.05). Xenografts treated with rhuMAb HER-2 plus taxol or 5-fluorouracil were not
`
`significantly different from drug alone controls with the doses and dose schedules tested in this model. A
`
`phase III, randomized clinical trial is in progress. testing chemotherapy alone vs. chemotherapy plus rhuMAb
`
`HER-2 in patients with advanced, HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer.
`
`(Supported by K12 CA01714,
`
`R01 CA86827, R29 CA60835, the U.S. Army Breast Cancer Research Program DAMD 17-94-J-4370, and
`
`the Revlon/UCLA Women's Cancer Research Program)
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 002
`Page 002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket