throbber
(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:77)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:74)
`
`(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`
`Genentech 2131
`Hospira v. Genentech
`IPR2017-00737
`
`

`

`ANTIBODY TARGETING 0F HER~2/neu
`
`were radiolabeled with 1 mCi Na'3‘1 (Amersham) by the lodeen
`method. Mice received i.p. injections of 10 pg of l"1—4D5 (specific
`activity, 1.8 pCi/pg) and 10 pg of ”SI-DA4—4 (specific activity, 1.4 pCi/
`pg),,‘Atg6,. 18, 24, 48, 72, and 120 h postinjection the animals were
`sacrificed, and their tumors and normal organs were harvested, washed,
`weighed, and analyzed for both l3'1 and ”‘1 activity. The i.p. route was
`chosen for these studies because preliminary experiments demonstrated
`virtually identical muMAB biodistributions after i.p. and i.v. injections
`but less mouse-to~mouse variability with the i.p. route, presumably
`because of occasional extravasations after tail vein injections. Results
`were expressed as the percentage injected dose of radioactivity per gram
`of tissue. Data were corrected for radioactive decay and spillover from
`the '3'] to the ”’1 channel. Groups of five mice were utilized to generate
`each data point, and their mean values were used to construct biodis-
`tribution curves for tumors and normal organs. The area under the
`blood activity versus time curves were calculated assuming a model with
`first-order absorption and elimination. Tumorzorgan ratios of radioac—
`tivity and localization indices were also determined. Localization in-
`dices were calculated from the ratio of specific:irrelevant antibody taken
`up by tumor (or organ) and normalized for simultaneous blood levels:
`
`% lD/Gm ”’I-4D5/% lD/Gm ”’1—DA—4—4 in tumor or (organ)
`% ID/Gm ”’I-4D5/% ID/GM ”’1-DA4—4 in blood
`
`Flow Cytometry. The specificity of binding of muMABs 7C2 and
`4D5 to the HER-Z/neu gene product was assessed by indirect immu-
`nofluorescence. Untransfected 3T3 cells do not express the HER-Z/
`neu gene product on their surface and were used as negative controls.
`3T3 cells transfected with the HER-Z/neu oncogene and SKBR3 cells
`express high surface densitities of the p185 protein and were used as
`positive cell lines. Cells (5 x 10’) of each type were incubated with
`saturating concentrations of muMABs 4D5, 7C2, or DA4—4 for 30 min
`on ice, washed three times, incubated with a 1:20 dilution of a fluores-
`ceinated, affinity-purified, goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin reagent
`(TAGO, lnc., Burlingame, CA) for 30 min, washed three times, and
`then fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. Cells were analyzed on a FACS 11
`cell sorter (Becton Dickinson, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA).
`Cellular Radioimmunoassay. muMABs 7C2 and 4D5 were labeled
`with Na”’1 (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) by the Iodo-Gen
`method as previously described (18). Briefly, 100 pg of antibody were
`added to 0.5 mCi of Nam] in a glass tube coated with 10 pg lodo-Gen
`(Pierce, Rockford, IL) for 10 min at room temperature. Free Na'zsl
`was removed by chromatography on a PD-10 column (Pharmacia,
`Piscataway, NJ), and eluted fractions were pooled and stored at 4°C.
`The immunoreactivities of x2"‘l-7C2 and ”51-4D5 using NlH3T3 HER-
`2/neu cells were 84% and 79%, respectively, by linear extrapolation to
`binding at infinite antigen excess (19) (data not shown). The avidities
`of ”’I-7C2 and '”I-4D5 as determined by Scatchard analysis were 4.48
`x 10’ L/M and 1.55 x 109 L/M, respectively (data not shown).
`NIH3T3 HER—Zlneu cells were washed with cold serum-free RPMI
`1640, pelleted by centrifugation, and cooled on ice for 45 min. ”’1-
`muMABs were then added to cell pellets in a ratio of 0.1 pg protein
`(200,000 cpm)/10‘ cells and incubated for 1 h. Cells were washed twice
`with cold RPMI 1640, plated in microtiter wells (1 x 10" cells/well),
`and warmed to 37'C in a humidified C02 incubator. After 0, 1, 4, 10,
`and 24 h the cultures were assayed for surface membrane-bound,
`intracellular, and supernatant radioactivity in a Beckman Gamma 5500
`counter (Palo Alto, CA) as previously described (20). Cell surface
`radioactivity was determined by elution of antibody from the cell
`membrane by a brief (S-min) exposure to a low-pH buffer (pH 1-2).
`The cells were subsequently pelleted by centrifugation at 300 x g and
`removed from the microtiter wells with cotton swabs to determine
`intracellular cpm. Culture supematants (0.2 ml) were treated with 0.6
`ml 25% TCA to precipitate protein—bound us1 released from the cell
`surface. This was separated from TCA-soluble supernatant radioactivity
`by centrifugation, and both fractions were assayed in a gamma counter.
`Immunoelectron Microscopy. NIH3T3 HER-Z/neu cells were grown
`to confluence in 96-well flat—bottomed plates and then incubated with
`muMAB 7C2 (64 pg/ml) for 45 min at 4'C. The cells were washed
`twice with cold media, and then a 1:2 dilution of a horseradish perox—
`idase-conjugated, monovalent, Fab’ goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin
`antiserum was added for an additional 45 min. The plates were washed
`again and incubated at 37'C for 0, 15, 30, or 240 min and fixed in 2%
`glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate (pH 7.4).
`Cells were then reacted for 15 min with 3,3’~diaminobenzidine (Sigma,
`St. Louis, M0) at 0.5 mg/ml in 0.05 M Tris buffer, pH 7.6, containing
`0.0009% hydrogen peroxide. After two washes in 0.1 M cacodylate,
`cells were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide and dehydrated in graded
`ethanol. Cell layers were then carefully processed into Epon 812, and
`blocks were sectioned en face or in cross-section and examined in a
`Philips 201 transmission electron microscope operated at 60 kV. Con-
`trol experiments demonstrated no detectable binding of isotype-
`where V,‘ is the mean tumor volume on day x and V0 is the mean tumor
`volume on the day of treatment.
`matched irrelevant antibodies DA4—4 and UPC10 to 3T3/HER-2/neu
`or SKBR3 cells or of anti-HER-Z/ueu antibodies 7C2 or 405 to
`At 0, 24, 48, 72, 144, and 216 h the mice were anesthetized and
`untransfected 3T3 cells by this immunoperoxidase technique.
`imaged for 10 min with a 400T General Electric gamma camera
`Antibody Biodistributions.
`lmmunodeficient 4—6-week-old male
`equipped with a high-energy collimator. The camera was peaked for
`BALB/c x C57/Bl beige/nude mice (Life Sciences, St. Petersburg, FL)
`I"I using a symmetric window of 38 keV. The activity within each
`were used for all in vivo experiments, since preliminary studies dem-
`mouse image was determined, and mean values were used to construct
`onstrated a higher tumor implantation rate (100% versus 80%) and
`whole-body time-activity curves for I“1.4D5 and I"I-DA4-4. Tumors
`greater synchrony of tumor growth than that observed with standard
`were outlined as regions of interest with a dedicated ADAC DPS-3300
`nude mice (data not shown). Animals received s.c. flank injections of 1
`computer, and the intraregional activity was measured in order to
`x 106 NIH3T3 HER-Z/neu cells. Palpable tumors (24—280 mm’; mean,
`generate tumor time-activity curves. Data were corrected for radioactive
`60 mm’) developed after 10 days. For biodistribution experiments,
`decay by serially imaging an ”'1 standard. All animals were given
`muMAB 4D5 and isotype-matched control muMAB DA4-4 (300 pg)
`potassium iodide as described above.
`1917
`
`Potassium iodide was added to the drinking water of mice 72 h prior
`to injecting radiolabeled antibody and was continued for 2 weeks in
`order to block thyroid uptake of free iodine.
`Autoradiography. To assess the homogeneity of radioactivity deliv—
`ered to tumor cells at a microscopic level, s.c. nodules were excised
`from 15 mice 18 h after i.p. injection of 10 pg (15-20 pCi) of radioio-
`dinated antibodies and processed for autoradiography. Excised tumors
`were bisected, embedded in OCT compound (Miles, 1nc., Elkhart, IN)
`and frozen in a dry ice—ethanol bath. Full-thickness 6-pm cryosections
`were cut, fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1
`M cacodylate (pH 7.4), dehydrated in graded ethanol, and air dried.
`”'1—4D5 (or u’1—DA4~4) was detected by clipping slides in Kodak NTB-
`2 nuclear emulsion (International Biotechnologies, Inc., New Haven,
`CT), exposing for 1 week at 4‘C, developing in Dektol (Kodak), fixing,
`and staining. A Nikon Microphot microscope was used to enumerate
`silver grains and perform photomicrography.
`Radioimmunotherapy and Radioimmunoscintigraphy. For therapy ex-
`periments, muMABs 4D5 and DA4—4 (0.6-1.0 mg) were radioiodinated
`with Na”'1 (6—10 mCi) to specific activities of 7.2-9.3 pCi/pg. Follow—
`ing PD-10 column chromatography, >98% of the I"I in the resulting
`radioimmunoconjugates was protein bound, as demonstrated by cellu-
`lose polyacetate electrophoresis. Groups of 4-7 tumorbearing mice
`each received injections of 400 pCi (range, 392—432 pCi) of IJ'1-
`muMABs in 0.6 ml PBS in Experiment 1 (45 pg/mouse) and 700 pCi
`(range, 667-705 pCi) in Experiment 2 (100 pg/mouse). Additional
`control groups received either unlabeled muMAB 405 (45 pg/mouse
`in Experiment 1; 100 pg/mouse in Experiment 2) or PBS. Tumors
`were measured twice weekly in 3 dimensions with a precision caliper,
`and the mean volumes were plotted versus time to generate growth
`curves. The percentage increase in tumor size was calculated as
`
`V, — V0
`V0
`
`% increase =
`
`x 100
`
`(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:77)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:74)
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on April 5, 2018. © 1992 American Association for Cancer Research.
`
`

`

`a
`
`too + SurfaceCPM
`‘0' SupernatantCI’M
`80 + IntracellularCPM
`EU 60
`
`
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`E.
`
`2
`s“
`
`0
`
`4
`
`16
`12
`3
`Time (hours)
`
`20
`
`24
`
`b 25 + TCASol.CPM
`--
`'TCAPrecip.CPM
`
`ANTIBODY TARGETING OF HER-2/neu
`
`a?
`
`En.
`
`UT
`
`:
`‘6p.
`
`0
`
`4
`
`12
`8
`16
`Time (hours)
`
`20
`
`24
`
`Fig. 3. Intemalization and catabolism of antibody by SKBR3 cells. Cells were
`pulse labeled with ”51-405 and incubated at 37°C for 0, 1, 4, 10, or 24 h before
`assaying for surface membrane-bound, intracellular, and supernatant cpm (a).
`Culture supernatants were subsequently precipitated with 25% TCA to distinguish
`intact usI-‘tDS (TCA-precipitable) from low-molecular-weight catabolites (TCA-
`soluble) (b).
`
`RESULTS
`
`Antibody Specificity. Indirect immunofluorescence with flow
`cytometry demonstrated intense, specific binding of the 4D5
`and 7C2 antibodies to cell lines known to express high surface
`antigen densities of the p185 HER-Z/neu gene product (3T3/
`HER-Z/neu cells, SKBR3 and SKOV3) but no significant bind-
`ing to cell lines lacking oncoprotein expression (e.g., untrans-
`fected 3T3 cells). Fig. 1 shows typical results from one of five
`experiments performed (using 3T3/HER-2/neu cells).
`Cellular Radioimmunoassays. Intemalization and catabolism
`of lz5I-4D5 and ‘251-7C2 by NIH3T3 HERJ/neu, SKBR3, and
`SKOV3 cells were evaluated in vitro using a cellular radio-
`immunoassay. Pulse-labeled cultures were assayed after 0, l, 4,
`10, and 24 h of incubation at 37°C for surface membrane-
`bound, intracellular, and supernatant radioactivity. Three sep-
`arate experiments yielded similar results. There was a steady
`loss of surface cpm from NIH3T3 HER-Z/neu cells, with a
`reciprocal increase in supernatant cpm for both 4D5 and 7C2
`(Fig. 2, a and b). Intracellular cpm peaked at 22% after 4 h for
`
`Number
`
`Cell
`
`Fluorescence Intensity (Logw)
`Fig. l. Fluorescein-activated cell sorter analysis of binding of anti-HER-Z/neu
`antibodies to untransfected NIH 3T3 cells and to 3T3 cells transfected with the
`HER-Z/neu oncogene. ----- , 4D5 on untransfected cells; — — — —, 7C2 on
`
`untransfected cells; —. 4D5 on HER-Z/neu transfected cells; ----- , 7C2 on
`transfected cells;
`. control antibody UPCIO on transfected cells.
`
`4D5 and 17% after 1 h for 7C2. After 24 h the percentage of
`total radioactivity remaining cell associated (i.e., cell surface
`plus intracellular cpm) was 46% and 56% for 4D5 and 7C2,
`respectively. Conversely, after 24 h 54% and 44% of total
`culture cpm were found within the supernatant for 4D5 and
`7C2, respectively. Supematants were treated with 25% TCA to
`determine the proportion of supernatant radioactivity contrib-
`uted by intact antibody (TCA precipitable) and by small-molec-
`ular-weight metabolites (TCA soluble). TCA-soluble cpm pro-
`gressively increased during the 24-h incubation period for both
`4D5 and 7C2, reaching peak values of 44% and 39% of total
`culture cpm, respectively (Fig. 2, c and (1). Hence, approxi-
`mately 44% of 125I—4D5 and 39% of ”51-7C2 were internalized,
`degraded, and exocytosed by the tumor cells in 24 h. The same
`pattern of internalization and catabolism was observed when
`these antibodies were incubated with human breast (SKBR3;
`Fig. 3) and ovarian (SKOV3; not shown) carcinoma cell lines,
`which also overexpress the HER-Z/neu oncoprotein.
`Immunoelectron Microscopy. The endocytic pathway of
`muMAB 7C2 was studied by immunoelectron microscopy in
`vitro. NIH3T3 HERéZ/neu cells were incubated with saturating
`concentrations of 7C2 for 30 min at 4'C, washed three times,
`and then incubated for 30 min with a monovalent, horseradish
`peroxidase—conjugated Fab’ goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin
`antiserum. Cells were washed again with cold buffer and then
`warmed to 37°C for 0, 15, 30, or 240 min before processing for
`electron microscopy as described in “Materials and Methods.”
`At 4'C anti-HER-Z/neu antibodies remained circumferentially
`distributed on the surface of cells (Fig. 4a), but when cells were
`warmed to 37°C endocytosis rapidly ensued. Within 15-30 min
`of incubation at 37°C,
`large numbers of peroxidase-labeled
`1918
`
`too
`
`“0
`
`2
`A.
`0 so
`
`l- 40
`a?
`20
`
`0
`
`o
`
`d
`
`a
`
`l6
`1:
`s
`Time (hours)
`
`:0
`
`24
`
`“-0-
`penal-MC
`+ 33".“ CPM PM
`—.— IntracelluluCPM
`
`too
`
`
`
`3°
`
`2
`a.
`0 5°
`0
`l- ‘0
`.e
`10
`
`
`
`s
`
`is
`11
`a
`Time (hours)
`
`to
`
`14
`
`0
`
`o
`
`c
`
`%TotalCPM
`
`%TotalCPM
`
`oaxtzis
`Time (hours)
`
`20 u
`
`0
`
`to
`II
`4 Wu
`lime (hours!
`
`50“
`
`Fig. 2. Intemalization and catabolism of antibody by NIH3T3 HER-Z/neu
`cells. Cells were pulse labeled with ”‘I-4D5 (a, c) or ‘z’I-7C2 (b, d) and incubated
`at 37‘C for 0, l, 4. 10, or 24 h before assaying for surface membrane-bound,
`intracellular, and supernatant cpm (a, 1)). Culture supematants were subsequently
`precipitated with 25% TCA to distinguish intact u’I-muMABS (TCA-precipitable)
`from low-molecular-weight catabolites (TCA—soluble) (c, d).
`
`(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:77)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:74)
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on April 5, 2018. © 1992 American Association for Cancer Research.
`
`

`

`ANTIBODY TARGETING 0F HER—Z/neu
`
`time points evaluated. The tu-
`the normal organs at all
`morznormal organ ratios of radioactivity ranged from 5:1 to
`10:1 and were most favorable 24—72 h postinjection (Table 1).
`The superior localization of l3'1-4D5 within tumors was a result
`of specific binding to the p185 oncoprotein, as illustrated in
`Fig. 5b. Up to 8-fold more anti-HER-Z/neu muMAB than the
`irrelevant antibody lzsI-DA4—4 accumulated in the tumors.
`However, the percentage injected dose of radioactivity per gram
`of tissue of '3'1-4D5 decreased precipitously from 25% at 24 h
`to 5% at 120 h postinjection. The area under the blood activity
`versus time curve was determined for both conjugates and
`revealed that ”SI-DA4-4 remained in circulation approximately
`3 times longer than '3‘1-4D5 (data not shown). Localization
`indices for the tumor and normal organs are presented in Table
`
`%ID/Gm
`
`0
`
`25
`
`75
`50
`Time (Hrs)
`
`—._ Tumor
`Blood
`Kidney
`Liver
`Muscle
`Spleen
`LungStomach
`Thyroid
`
`
`
`Fig. 4. Immunoelectron microscopy documenting endocytosis of anti-HERZ/
`neu antibodies by N1H3T3 cells transfected with the HER-Z/neu oncogene.
`Indirect immunoperoxidase cytochemistry was used to study the internalization
`of muMAB 7C2 as described in “Materials and Methods.“ (1, muMAB 7C2 was
`densely distributed on the surface of N1H3T3 HER-Z/neu cells at time 0. Within
`15—30 min of incubation at 37‘C large numbers of peroxidase-labeled “coated
`pits” (b, arrows), “coated vesicles." and uncoated endocytic vesicles (c) were
`detectable. Large numbers of peroxidase-labeled dense body lysosomes became
`evident between 30 and 240 min of incubation (1!). Bars, 1 pm (a, c, d) or 0.1 pm
`(0)-
`
`“coated pits,” “coated vesicles,” and uncoated endocytic vesicles
`were detectable (Fig. 4, b and c). Large numbers of peroxidase-
`labeled dense body lysosomes became evident between 30 and
`240 min of incubation (Fig. 4d). Similar results were observed
`with other anti-HER-Z/neu antibodies and other p185—express~
`ing cell lines (e.g., SKBR3; data not shown).
`In Vivo Biodistribution. The biodistribution of muMABs 4D5
`
`%ID/Gm
`
`0
`
`25
`
`100
`
`125
`
`7 5
`50
`Time (Hrs)
`Fig. 5. a, biodistribution of ”'1—4D5 in beige/nude mice bearing HER-Z/neu—
`expressing tumors. Groups of five mice bearing s.c. N1H3T3 HER-Z/neu tumor
`grafts received simultaneous injections of 10 ug of I"1-4D5 (18 uCi) and 10 ug
`of I”l-DA4—4 (l4 uCi). At 6, 24, 48. 72, and 120 h postinjection the animals were
`sacrificed, and their tumors and normal organs were harvested, weighed, and
`assayed for ”'1 and ”’1 activity. The biodistribution curves for '3'1-4D5 within
`tumor. blood, and normal tissues are shown. b, comparative localization of ”'1-
`4D5 and 'z’l-DA4-4 within tumors as a function of time.
`
`Table 1 Tumormarmal organ ratios for "'l—405
`The tumor:normal organ ratios of activity for ”'1—4D5 were calculated at 6,
`24, 48, 72. and 120 h after the injection of radioimmunoconjugate into beige/
`nude mice bearing 3T3/HER~2/neu tumors. Groups of five mice were used to
`generate mean values for each time point. Data were normalized for tissue weight
`and corrected for radioactive decay.
`
`and 7C2 were evaluated in beige/nude mice bearing s.c.
`N1H3T3 HER-Z/neu tumor grafts. Animals received simulta-
`neous i.p. injections of 10 pg each of ”'1-4D5 and ”SI-DA4-4.
`120
`72
`48
`24
`6
`Organ
`1.21
`1.58
`1.35
`1.47
`0.43
`Blood
`At 6, 18, 24, 48, 72, and 120 h postinjection the mice were
`5.49
`10.40
`9.20
`10.56
`2.60
`Kidney
`sacrificed, and their tumors and organs were harvested, washed,
`5.50
`7.14
`6.36
`6.42
`1.54
`Liver
`weighed, and assayed for ”'1 and '251 activity. Specific localiza-
`4.01
`8.29
`6.77
`7.85
`2.15
`Spleen
`4.21
`5.55
`5.25
`6.37
`1.74
`Lung
`tion of antibody to tumors was documented in four separate
`6.79
`20.78
`20.65
`1 7.95
`3.77
`Stomach
`experiments. A representative study is shown in Fig. 5a. The
`4.12Thyroid 6.93 10.81 8.86 9.69
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration of l"1—4D5 within tumor exceeded that in any of
`1919
`
`Time (h)
`
`(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:77)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:74)
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on April 5, 2018. © 1992 American Association for Cancer Research.
`
`

`

`ANTIBODY TARGET’ING 0F HER-Z/neu
`
`2. Specific uptake of mI-4D5 within tumors was seen as early
`as 6 h postinjection (localization index = 2.2) and reached a
`maximum value of 6.6 at 24 h. The biodistribution of muMAB
`
`7C2 paralleled that of 4D5, with up to 28% injected dose of
`radioactivity per gram of tumor accumulating within tumors at
`36 h, and tumor:normal organ radioactivity ratios of 5:1 to 30:1
`(data not shown).
`Autoradiography of Tumor Nodules. To assess the heteroge-
`neity of antibody distribution within tumor nodules, tumors
`from 15 mice in 3 biodistribution experiments were processed
`for autoradiography 18 h after injection of l3’I-4D5, as de-
`scribed in “Materials and Methods.” A heterogeneous distri-
`bution of autoradiographic silver grains was observed in tumors,
`with the heaviest grain densities occurring in perivascular lo-
`cations (Fig. 6).
`Radioimmunotherapy and Imaging. In order to assess the
`therapeutic efficacy of radioiodinated anti-HER-Z/neu mu-
`MABs in our animal model, beige/nude mice bearing estab-
`lished NIH3T3 HER-Z/neu tumor grafts received i.p. injections
`of 400 uCi of ”'1—4D5 (45 ug/mouse). Groups of control mice
`received either 400 pCi
`l"I-DA4-4, unlabeled 4D5 (45 ug/
`mouse), or PBS. Tumor volumes were measured twice weekly,
`and the mean values were plotted versus time to construct
`growth curves. No significant difference in tumor growth was
`observed between animals treated with unlabeled 4D5 and PBS
`
`Table 2 Localization indicesfar ”‘I-4D5
`The localization indices for l"l-4D5 were calculated 6, 24, 48, 72. and 120 h
`after the simultaneous injection of I"1—405 and ”’I-DA4-4 into tumor-bearing
`beige/nude mice, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Groups of five mice
`were used to generate mean values for each time point. Data were corrected for
`radioactive decay and spillover from the ”'1 to the lzsI channel.
`Time (h)
`
`Organ
`Tumor
`Kidney
`Liver
`Spleen
`Lung
`Stomach
`Thyroid
`
`6
`2.17
`0.96
`1.50
`1.07
`1.15
`0.75
`0.98
`
`24
`6.60
`1.09
`1.46
`1.10
`1.09
`1.59
`1.23
`
`48
`4.14
`1.08
`1.27
`0.97
`1.05
`2.08
`1.12
`
`72
`5.31
`1.06
`1.22
`0.97
`1.07
`2.16
`1.09
`
`120
`3.50
`1.48
`1.23
`2.02
`1.14
`2.51
`1.22
`
`8 weeks. None of the 10 mice mice treated with unlabeled 4D5
`or PBS survived for 8 weeks.
`
`Serial gamma camera imaging was performed as described in
`“Materials and Methods” to assess the abilities of ”‘I—4D5 and
`
`”'I-DA4-4 to image tumor grafts (Fig. 9). Excellent imaging
`of HER—Z/neu-expressing tumors was reliably achieved using
`'3'1—4D5, with optimal resolution being obtained between 8 and
`72 h after injection of l3‘I-4D5. Specific localization of radio-
`activity to tumors was not observed using l"I-DA4-4, but mice
`retained radioactivity longer when receiving injections of this
`antibody. The biological I”; of l"I-DA4-4 was 6.5 days, ap—
`proximately twice that of ”'I—4D5 (3.3 days; Fig. 10a). Tumor
`time-activity curves for ”‘I-4D5 and ”'I-DAM were generated
`by serially measuring the activity within a region of interest
`constructed around the tumor image (Fig. 10b). As anticipated,
`a higher peak activity within the tumor was achieved with the
`anti-HER-Z/neu conjugate. However, this antibody appeared
`to be cleared from the tumor more rapidly than the irrelevant
`conjugate. The protracted clearance of the irrelevant antibody
`from tumor sites most likely resulted from the lack of specific
`endocytosis and catabolism of I31I-DA4-4 by tumor cells, as
`well as from the increased blood flow to rapidly growing tumors
`in mice given the control reagent.
`
`(Fig. 7). However, mice treated with ”'1-4D5 showed marked
`tumor growth retardation. Animals given 13'1-DA4-4 also ex-
`perienced tumor growth delays, although the degree of inhibi-
`tion was significantly less pronounced than in the ”'1-4D5
`treated group (Fig. 7). The different regimens were also com-
`pared by calculating the percentage increase in tumor size at
`various days posttreatment, relative to the initial tumor volume.
`Table 3 demonstrates that '3‘1-4D5 was 20—fold more effective
`than I3'1-DA4-4 in retarding tumor growth 24 days after anti-
`body injection and was 75-fold more efficacious than unlabeled
`4D5. Although the effect of ”'1-4D5 was striking,
`tumors
`eventually progressed in all animals. Tumor regrowth, which
`generally occurred 3 weeks after therapy, was not due to the
`selection of an antigen-negative cell clone, since grafts contin-
`ued to overexpress the HER-2/neu protein when evaluated by
`immunohistochemistry (data not shown). Rather, treatment
`failure most
`likely resulted from the inability to deliver a
`sufficiently lethal radiation dose to the tumor. No fatal toxici-
`ties were observed in mice treated with 400 uCi of 13‘I-4D5 or
`'3‘I-DA4-4; all deaths at this dose level were due to tumor
`progression.
`In an attempt to achieve curative tumor ablations, we re-
`peated the radioimmunotherapy experiment using a higher l3‘I
`activity (700 rather than 400 uCi/mouse; Fig. 8). This higher
`dose of ”'I-4D5 caused tumor growth retardation similar in
`magnitude to that seen in mice given 400 [1C1 of the conjugate
`(Fig. 7) and did not prevent eventual tumor progression (Fig.
`8). Furthermore, increasing the radiation dose of the control
`reagent, '3'I-DA4-4, to 700 uCi increased the nonspecific total
`body irradiation in recipient mice dramatically, resulting in
`significant tumor regressions in this control group (Fig. 8). At
`the higher dose level, fatal hematological toxicity was observed
`in two of five recipients of the l3‘I-DA4-4 reagent but in none
`of the four mice treated with 13‘I-4D5. Hematological parame—
`ters reached nadir values 14 days posttherapy and returned to
`normal by day 21 in surviving mice (data not shown). Two of
`‘0. W. Press, .1. F. Eary. C. C. Badger, P. J. Martin, F. R. Appelbaum. R.
`four mice treated with 700 uCi l3'I-4D5 survived >8 weeks,
`Levy. R. Miller. S. Brown, W. B. Nelp. K. A. Krohn, D. Fisher, K. B. De Santes.
`B. Porter, P. Kidd, E. D. Thomas, and I. D. Bernstein, unpublished results.
`whereas only one of five mice treated with ”'I-DA4-4 survived
`1920
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Breast and ovarian adenocarcinomas account for 36% of all
`
`adult female malignancies and cause over 50,000 deaths/year
`in the United States alone (21). Although considerable progress
`has been made in treating these diseases, approximately 30%
`of breast cancer patients and 60% of ovarian cancer patients
`cannot be cured with current therapeutic approaches. Patients
`whose tumors amplify and overexpress the HER-Z/neu gene
`have an especially poor prognosis (7) and constitute a group
`for whom new treatment strategies are needed. One novel
`approach for such patients might involve therapy with immu-
`noconjugates targeting the HER-Z/neu gene product. We have
`recently tested an analogous approach in 14 patients with
`relapsed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using radioiodinated mono-
`clonal antibodies directed against B-lymphocyte differentiation
`antigens. Preliminary results have been encouraging; all 14
`lymphoma patients have had objective responses, including 11
`complete responses, with remission durations ranging from 4
`to 38+ months (22).‘
`The HER-Z/neu oncoprotein is an attractive target for anti-
`body-mediated therapy for several reasons. Overexpression oc-
`
`(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:77)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:74)
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on April 5, 2018. © 1992 American Association for Cancer Research.
`
`

`

`ANTIBODY TARGETING OF HER-Z/neu
`
`0 1.131405
`o 1-1310A4-4
`A Unlabeled405
`A No Treatment
`
`(1
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`Day
`
`14
`
`n 12
`5
`V 10
`g '8
`6
`4
`g
`a 20
`
`3>
`
`Fig. 7. Radioimmunotherapy of NIH3T3 HER-Z/neu tumor grafts. Groups of
`five to seven beige/nude mice bearing well-established s.c. tumors received injec-
`tions of 400 yd "'1—405. 400 uCi "'1-DA4—4, unlabeled 4D5. or PBS. Tumor
`volumes were measured twice weekly, and the mean values were plotted versus
`time to generate growth curves.
`
`imally tolerated doses of radioimmunoconjugate were used (700
`uCi). At least two mechanisms may have contributed to our
`inability to permanently eradicate tumors in this model system.
`First, the inhomogeneous deposition of ”'1-4D5 within tumors
`demonstrated by autoradiography may have resulted in the
`sublethal irradiation of tumor cells distant from capillaries,
`allowing subsequent regrowth of tumors. Second, rapid intra-
`tumoral antibody catabolism may have compromised the effi-
`cacy of this approach by diminishing the retention of l3'1
`targeted to tumors by the 4D5 antibody. Cellular radioimmuno-
`assays and immunoelectron microscopy demonstrated prompt
`internalization of I"1—4D5 after binding to cells, followed by
`intracellular routing to lysosomes where degradation and deiod-
`ination occurred, followed by exocytosis of the radiolabel. Sim-
`ilar studies have recently been published by other workers (30).
`In vivo biodistribution studies demonstrated that the anti-HER-
`2/neu conjugate reached a 6—7-fold higher peak concentration
`within tumors than the irrelevant antibody but was also cleared
`more rapidly from tumors than the nonbinding, nonintemalized
`”‘l-DA4-4 antibody.
`Several strategies could be attempted to improve radiation
`delivery to HER-2/neu-expressing tumors. A fractionated treat-
`ment schedule might permit delivery of a higher cumulative
`
`curs in approximately one-third of breast and ovarian cancers
`but not on normal adult tissues (23). In addition, antigen density
`appears to be uniform throughout a given tumor, so the anti-
`body could theoretically be distributed to all regions of the
`malignancy (9). Furthermore, excellent concordance has been
`observed between the level of expression within primary and
`metastatic or recurrent lesions (8, 9, 12). Finally, the likelihood
`of developing an antigen-negative cell clone may be reduced in
`this setting, since continued expression of p185 appears to be
`a prerequisite for maintaining the malignant phenotype in cells
`transformed by HER-Z/neu (14).
`In this report, we have demonstrated the ability of a radio-
`iodinated anti-HER-Z/neu muMAB to retard the growth of
`HER-Z/neu-expressing tumors implanted in immunocompro—
`mised mice. Several mechanisms may be responsible for the
`antitumor effect including down-regulation of p185 expression
`(24) and radiation-induced genetic damage from I"l (25—27).
`Antigenic modulation of the HER-Z/neu protein may deprive
`the cell of an important oncog

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket