throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00728
`U.S. Patent No. 7,421,032
`_________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Apple Inc.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`California Institute of Technology,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slides
`U.S. Patent 7,421,032
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00728
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`May 8, 2018
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`1
`
`

`

`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`2
`
`

`

`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`3
`
`

`

`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`• Claims 18–23 Are Obvious Over Ping, MacKay, Divsalar,
`and Luby97
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`4
`
`

`

`‘032 Patent Claims Combine a Conventional
`Decoder With a Known Irregularity Technique
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1201 [’032 patent] at Claim 18
`
`Pet. at 50-64, Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶189-205
`
`5
`
`

`

`Message Passing Decoders Were Well Known
`
`Ex. 1217 [Divsalar] at p. 9
`
`* * *
`
`* * *
`
`Ex. 1208 [Luby97] at 158
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1449, 1454
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 20-24, 53-54; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶62-68, 201-202
`
`6
`
`

`

`“In Accordance With The [Claimed] Tanner Graph”
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`7
`
`DI at 10-11; Pet. at 28-29, 54-55; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶109-110, 130
`
`Pet. at 55
`
`

`

`Ping, Divsalar, and Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• “a parity bit is determined as a
`function of both information bits and
`other parity bits as shown by the
`configuration of nodes and edges of
`the Tanner graph”
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 56
`
`Pet. at 55-57; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶132-134
`
`8
`
`

`

`Ping, Divsalar, and Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• “check nodes, randomly connected to the repeated message bits,
`enforce constraints that determine parity bits”
`
`Ex. 1203 [Ping] at 38
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 61-64; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶144-151, 204-205
`
`9
`
`

`

`Ping, Divsalar, and Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• “a graph representing an [irregular repeat accumulate (“IRA”)]
`code as a set of parity checks where every message bit is
`repeated”
`
`Repeat
`
`Accumulate
`
`Ex. 1217 [Divsalar] at Fig. 3
`
`Pet. at 59
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 57-61; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶135-143
`
`10
`
`

`

`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`11
`
`Pet. at 46-48; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶120-123; Reply at 16-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶38
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶120
`
`

`

`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶121
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`12
`
`Pet. at 46-48; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶120-123; Reply at 16-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶38
`
`

`

`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• Luby97 teaches a datastream
`
`Ex. 1208 [Luby97] at 150
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`13
`
`Pet. at 40-41, 48-50, 52-53, 64-65; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶95, 193-200, 207
`
`

`

`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶174-175
`
`Pet. at 48-50; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶173-175
`
`14
`
`

`

`MacKay Teaches Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`15
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 41-46, 57-58; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶87, 111-119, 136, 158
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`

`

`MacKay Provides Motivations to Combine
`Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1449, 1452
`
`Pet. at 41-46; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶111-119
`
`16
`
`

`

`The Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 44
`
`Pet. at 41-46; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶111-119
`
`17
`
`

`

`The Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`Reply 8-20; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] 30-43; Ex. 1148 [Tanner Graph for Ping], Ex. 1149 [Tanner Graph for MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`18
`
`Reply at 9
`
`

`

`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`19
`
`

`

`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`• PO Chose not to depose Petitioner’s experts
`
`– Dr. Frey (Reply Declarant)
`
`– Dr. Davis (2nd Declaration)
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`20
`
`

`

`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`21
`
`

`

`Surreply Issues
`
`CalTech Surreply Issue
`
`Issue Addressed in Briefing
`
`MacKay discloses non-uniform column weights
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 41-46; Reply at 2-5
`
`MacKay discloses non-uniform row weights
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 66-68; Reply at 19-20
`
`It would have been obvious to modify Ping to
`be non-systematic
`
`Pet. at 9, 72-73; Reply at 20-21
`
`Experimental data demonstrates the ease of
`implementation
`
`Pet. at 43-44; Reply at 13-17
`
`Tanner graphs are supported by the petition
`
`Pet. at 17, 60; Reply at 8
`
`A POSITA would have been motivated to
`combine Ping and MacKay
`
`Pet. at 41-46; Reply at 6-18
`
`The Petition showed Reasonable Expectation of
`Success
`
`Pet. at 41-46; Reply at 6-18
`
`The Petition showed a message passing decoder
`
`Pet. at 20-24; Reply at 18-19
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`22
`
`

`

`MacKay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`23
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 41-46; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶87, 111-119, 158
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶115
`
`

`

`MacKay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 41-46; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶87, 111-119, 158; Reply at 2-5; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶20-24
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`24
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1450, 1453
`
`

`

`MacKay Discloses Non-Uniform Row Weights
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 66-68; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶87, 111-119, 158-161; Reply at 19-20; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶61-62
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`25
`
`

`

`It Would Have Been Obvious To Modify Ping To
`Be Non-Systematic
`
`Pet. at 9
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`26
`
`Pet. at 9, 72-73; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶31-32, 215-216; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶63
`
`Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶63
`
`

`

`It Would Have Been Obvious To Modify Ping To
`Be Non-Systematic
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 32
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`27
`
`Pet. at 9, 72-73; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶31-32, 215-216; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶63
`
`Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶63
`
`

`

`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶114, 116
`
`Pet. at 43-44; Reply at 13-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶42-56
`
`28
`
`

`

`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`* * *
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶41-42
`
`Pet. at 43-44; Reply at 13-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶42-56
`
`29
`
`

`

`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`Ping + McKay
`
`Ping
`
`Better Performance
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Noisier Channel
`
`Pet. at 43-44; Reply at 13-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶42-56
`
`Ex. 1268 [Simulation] at 9
`
`30
`
`

`

`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶56
`
`Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶31
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 17, 60; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶56, 141; Reply at 8
`
`31
`
`

`

`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Pet. at 32
`
`Ex. 1248 [Tanner graph for Ping]
`
`Pet. at 35-36
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 17, 60; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶56, 141; Reply at 8
`
`32
`
`

`

`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`* * *
`
`Pet. at 43, 44
`
`Ex. 1149 [Tanner graph for
`MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1451
`
`Pet. at 17, 60; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶56, 141; Reply at 8
`
`33
`
`

`

`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1450
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 43; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶115
`
`34
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00728
`
`Dated: May 7, 2018
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Richard A. Goldenberg (No. 38,895)
`Dominic A. Massa (No. 44,905)
`Michael H. Smith (No. 71,190)
`Mark D. Selwyn (pro hac vice)
`James M. Dowd (pro hac vice)
`Kelvin Chan (No. 71,433)
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00728
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 7, 2018, a true and correct copy of the following:
`
` Petitioner’s Demonstratives for Oral Argument
`was served via electronic mail upon the following attorneys of record:
`
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Richard Torczon (rtorczon@wsgr.com)
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Kelvin W. Chan (Reg. No. 71,433)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket