`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00728
`U.S. Patent No. 7,421,032
`_________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple Inc.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`California Institute of Technology,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slides
`U.S. Patent 7,421,032
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00728
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`May 8, 2018
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`1
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`2
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`3
`
`
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`• Claims 18–23 Are Obvious Over Ping, MacKay, Divsalar,
`and Luby97
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`4
`
`
`
`‘032 Patent Claims Combine a Conventional
`Decoder With a Known Irregularity Technique
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1201 [’032 patent] at Claim 18
`
`Pet. at 50-64, Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶189-205
`
`5
`
`
`
`Message Passing Decoders Were Well Known
`
`Ex. 1217 [Divsalar] at p. 9
`
`* * *
`
`* * *
`
`Ex. 1208 [Luby97] at 158
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1449, 1454
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 20-24, 53-54; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶62-68, 201-202
`
`6
`
`
`
`“In Accordance With The [Claimed] Tanner Graph”
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`7
`
`DI at 10-11; Pet. at 28-29, 54-55; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶109-110, 130
`
`Pet. at 55
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, and Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• “a parity bit is determined as a
`function of both information bits and
`other parity bits as shown by the
`configuration of nodes and edges of
`the Tanner graph”
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 56
`
`Pet. at 55-57; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶132-134
`
`8
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, and Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• “check nodes, randomly connected to the repeated message bits,
`enforce constraints that determine parity bits”
`
`Ex. 1203 [Ping] at 38
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 61-64; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶144-151, 204-205
`
`9
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, and Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• “a graph representing an [irregular repeat accumulate (“IRA”)]
`code as a set of parity checks where every message bit is
`repeated”
`
`Repeat
`
`Accumulate
`
`Ex. 1217 [Divsalar] at Fig. 3
`
`Pet. at 59
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 57-61; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶135-143
`
`10
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`11
`
`Pet. at 46-48; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶120-123; Reply at 16-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶38
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶120
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶121
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`12
`
`Pet. at 46-48; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶120-123; Reply at 16-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶38
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• Luby97 teaches a datastream
`
`Ex. 1208 [Luby97] at 150
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`13
`
`Pet. at 40-41, 48-50, 52-53, 64-65; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶95, 193-200, 207
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶174-175
`
`Pet. at 48-50; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶173-175
`
`14
`
`
`
`MacKay Teaches Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`15
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 41-46, 57-58; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶87, 111-119, 136, 158
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`
`
`MacKay Provides Motivations to Combine
`Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1449, 1452
`
`Pet. at 41-46; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶111-119
`
`16
`
`
`
`The Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 44
`
`Pet. at 41-46; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶111-119
`
`17
`
`
`
`The Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`Reply 8-20; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] 30-43; Ex. 1148 [Tanner Graph for Ping], Ex. 1149 [Tanner Graph for MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`18
`
`Reply at 9
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`19
`
`
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`• PO Chose not to depose Petitioner’s experts
`
`– Dr. Frey (Reply Declarant)
`
`– Dr. Davis (2nd Declaration)
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`20
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`21
`
`
`
`Surreply Issues
`
`CalTech Surreply Issue
`
`Issue Addressed in Briefing
`
`MacKay discloses non-uniform column weights
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 41-46; Reply at 2-5
`
`MacKay discloses non-uniform row weights
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 66-68; Reply at 19-20
`
`It would have been obvious to modify Ping to
`be non-systematic
`
`Pet. at 9, 72-73; Reply at 20-21
`
`Experimental data demonstrates the ease of
`implementation
`
`Pet. at 43-44; Reply at 13-17
`
`Tanner graphs are supported by the petition
`
`Pet. at 17, 60; Reply at 8
`
`A POSITA would have been motivated to
`combine Ping and MacKay
`
`Pet. at 41-46; Reply at 6-18
`
`The Petition showed Reasonable Expectation of
`Success
`
`Pet. at 41-46; Reply at 6-18
`
`The Petition showed a message passing decoder
`
`Pet. at 20-24; Reply at 18-19
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`22
`
`
`
`MacKay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`23
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 41-46; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶87, 111-119, 158
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶115
`
`
`
`MacKay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 41-46; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶87, 111-119, 158; Reply at 2-5; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶20-24
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`24
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1450, 1453
`
`
`
`MacKay Discloses Non-Uniform Row Weights
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 66-68; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶87, 111-119, 158-161; Reply at 19-20; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶61-62
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`25
`
`
`
`It Would Have Been Obvious To Modify Ping To
`Be Non-Systematic
`
`Pet. at 9
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`26
`
`Pet. at 9, 72-73; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶31-32, 215-216; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶63
`
`Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶63
`
`
`
`It Would Have Been Obvious To Modify Ping To
`Be Non-Systematic
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 32
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`27
`
`Pet. at 9, 72-73; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶31-32, 215-216; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶63
`
`Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶63
`
`
`
`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶114, 116
`
`Pet. at 43-44; Reply at 13-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶42-56
`
`28
`
`
`
`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`* * *
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶41-42
`
`Pet. at 43-44; Reply at 13-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶42-56
`
`29
`
`
`
`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`Ping + McKay
`
`Ping
`
`Better Performance
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Noisier Channel
`
`Pet. at 43-44; Reply at 13-17; Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶42-56
`
`Ex. 1268 [Simulation] at 9
`
`30
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶56
`
`Ex. 1265 [Frey Decl.] at ¶31
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 17, 60; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶56, 141; Reply at 8
`
`31
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Pet. at 32
`
`Ex. 1248 [Tanner graph for Ping]
`
`Pet. at 35-36
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 17, 60; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶56, 141; Reply at 8
`
`32
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`* * *
`
`Pet. at 43, 44
`
`Ex. 1149 [Tanner graph for
`MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1451
`
`Pet. at 17, 60; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶56, 141; Reply at 8
`
`33
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1202 [MacKay] at 1450
`
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Pet. at 43; Ex. 1204 [Davis Decl.] at ¶115
`
`34
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00728
`
`Dated: May 7, 2018
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Richard A. Goldenberg (No. 38,895)
`Dominic A. Massa (No. 44,905)
`Michael H. Smith (No. 71,190)
`Mark D. Selwyn (pro hac vice)
`James M. Dowd (pro hac vice)
`Kelvin Chan (No. 71,433)
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00728
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 7, 2018, a true and correct copy of the following:
`
` Petitioner’s Demonstratives for Oral Argument
`was served via electronic mail upon the following attorneys of record:
`
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Richard Torczon (rtorczon@wsgr.com)
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Kelvin W. Chan (Reg. No. 71,433)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`