throbber
Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibits
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, IPR2017-00714
`Petition Challenging U.S. Pat. No. 6,470,399
`Based On U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,081 (“Aytac”)
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 1
`
`

`

`U.S. Pat. No. 6,470,399 (“the ’399 Patent”)
` Title: “Flexible Interface for Communication Between a Host
`and an Analog I/O Device Connected to the Interface
`Regardless of the Type of the I/O Device”
` Named Inventor: Michael Tasler
` Owner: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
` Earliest asserted priority date: March 4, 1997
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Ex. 1001.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00714 Overview
` Challenged Claims: 1-3, 5, 6, 11, 14, and 15 (1, 11, and 14 are independent)
` Single Ground of Unpatentability Under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a):
`
`Claims
`1-3, 5, 6, 11, 14, and 15
`
`References
`Aytac, SCSI Specification, Lin, AAPA
`
`Institution Dec. at 21.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`* Citations to the Petition are to the Corrected Petition (Paper No. 9).
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00714 Outline
` Background
`- ’399 Patent and Prior Art
`- Related PTAB Proceedings
` Uncontested Issues
`- Aytac, the SCSI Specification, and Lin Are Prior Art
`- Uncontested Claim Limitations
` Claim Construction – “Whereupon” Clause
`- Papst’s Improper Importation of a Negative Limitation into “whereupon the host device
`communicates . . . by means of . . .”
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00714 Outline
` Claim Construction – “Whereupon” Clause
`- Papst’s Further Improper Importation of a Reliability into “whereupon the host device
`communicates . . . by means of . . .”
` Communication “By Means of” Customary ASPI Drivers
`- Aytac’s ASPI Drivers
`- Aytac & ’399 Patent Discuss Communicating the Same Way
` Aytac Need Not Be Modified
` Motivation to Combine References
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 5
`
`

`

`Background
`’399 Patent and Prior Art
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 6
`
`

`

`’399 Patent Background
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶43; Pet. at 2.
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶43; Pet. at 2.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 39; Ex. 1001, Fig. 1.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 7
`
`

`

`Aytac Background
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶57; Pet. at
`14-16.
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶57; Pet. at 14-16.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 15; Ex. 1005, Fig. 1.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 8
`
`

`

`Aytac Background
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 45; Ex. 1005, Figs. 1 and 2 (annotated).
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 9
`
`

`

`Aytac Background
`
`Pet. at 40-41; Ex. 1005, Fig. 2 (annotated).
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 40-41; Ex. 1003 at ¶118-19.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 10
`
`

`

`Aytac’s CaTbox Connected to Scanner
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 27; see also Ex. 1003 at ¶¶92-93.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 11
`
`

`

`Aytac’s CaTbox Connected to Scanner
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 30; see also Ex. 1003 at ¶101.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 12
`
`

`

`Aytac’s CaTbox Connected to Scanner
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 36-37; see also Ex. 1003 at ¶ ¶ 111-13.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 13
`
`

`

`AAPA
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 56.
`
`Pet. at 62-63.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 14
`
`

`

`SCSI Background: INQUIRY
`
`Pet. at 22-23; Ex. 1003 at ¶¶65-69.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 23; see also Ex. 1003 at ¶¶65-69.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 15
`
`

`

`SCSI Background: File System Information
`
`Pet. at 23; see also Ex. 1003 at ¶¶70-79.
`
`Pet. at 23-24; Ex. 1003 at ¶¶70-79.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 16
`
`

`

`SCSI Background: Read/Write
`
`Pet. at 25; see also Ex. 1003 at ¶¶80-83.
`
`Pet. at 25; Ex. 1003 at ¶¶80-83.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 17
`
`

`

`Background
`Related PTAB Proceedings
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 18
`
`

`

`Aytac-Based IPRs
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 5.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 19
`
`

`

`Aytac-Based IPRs: IPR2016-01199
`
`Ex. 1022 at 56-57.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 20
`
`

`

`Aytac-Based IPRs: IPR2016-01200
`
`Ex. 1023 at 34.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 21
`
`

`

`Aytac-Based IPRs: IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 22
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 23
`
`

`

`Uncontested: Aytac Is Prior Art
` U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,081
` Title: “Computing and Communications Transmitting,
`Receiving System, With a Push Button Interface,
`That Is Continuously On, That Pairs Up With a
`Personal Computer and Carries Out Mainly Communications
`Related Routine Tasks”
` Named Inventor: Haluk M. Aytac
` Filed: December 8, 1995
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
`Ex. 1005; Pet. at 8; see Resp. at 10-16.
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 24
`
`

`

`Uncontested: SCSI Specification Is Prior Art
` Title: “American National Standard for Information
`Systems, Small Computer System Interface-2"
` Published: 1994
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and 102(b)
`
`Ex. 1006; Pet. at 8; see Resp. at 16.
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 25
`
`

`

`Uncontested: Lin is Prior Art
` U.S. Pat. No. 6,552,432
` Title: “Image Scanner With Automatic Signal
`Compensation”
` Named Inventor: Lin
` Filed: April 16, 1996
` Issued: February 18, 2003
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
`
`Ex. 1007; Pet. at 8; see Resp. at 16.
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 26
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claims 1 and 11
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Spec. + Lin + AAPA?
`
`[Preamble] An interface device for communication
`between a host device …
`[a] a processor
`
`[b] a memory
`
`[c] a first connecting device …
`
`[d] a second connecting device …
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 28-52; see Resp. at 30-50.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 27
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`Claims 1 and 11
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Spec. + Lin + AAPA?
`[e] wherein the interface device is configured by the
`Patent Owner only contested a sub-part of the “first
`processor and the memory to include a first
`command interpreter” (see below)
`command interpreter and a second command
`interpreter
`[f] wherein the first command interpreter is
`configured in such a way … whereupon the host
`device communicates with the interface by means
`of the {driver for the input/output device customary
`in a host device} {specific driver for the multi-
`purpose interface}
`[g] wherein the second command interpreter …
`
`“Whereupon” Clause Contested
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 52-65; see Resp. at 30-50.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 28
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 14
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Spec. + Lin + AAPA?
`
`[Preamble] A method of communication …
`
`[a] interfacing of the host device with a first
`connecting device …
`[b] interfacing of the data transmit/receive device
`with a second connecting device …
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 28-41, 44-52; see Resp. at 30-50.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 29
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 14
`
`[c and d] inquiring by the host device … whereupon
`the host device communicates with the interface
`device by means of the usual driver for the
`input/output device
`[e] interpreting a data request command from the
`host device …
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Spec. + Lin + AAPA?
`
`“Whereupon” Clause Contested
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 53-65; see Resp. at 30-50.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 30
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Dependent Claims
`Claim
`Additional Limitations Disclosed by Aytac +
`SCSI Spec. + Lin + AAPA?
`YES
`
`2
`
`3
`
`5
`
`6
`
`15
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 66-72; see Resp. at 50.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 31
`
`

`

`Claim Construction
`“Whereupon” clause
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 32
`
`

`

`“Whereupon” Recitation in the Claims: Claim 1
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 33
`
`

`

`“Whereupon” Recitation in the Claims: Claim 11
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 34
`
`

`

`“Whereupon” Recitation in the Claims: Claim 14
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 35
`
`

`

`Papst Improperly Imports Limitations into the Claims
` Communication “by means of”
`- Solely by means of
`- Without resorting to specialized software to facilitate communication
` Reliable communication
`- Whereby reliable communication between the host device and the interface
`device is achieved
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 36
`
`

`

`“Whereupon” Limitation: A Comparison
`Claim Actual Claim Language
`Claim Language as Rewritten by Papst
`
`1 & 11 whereupon the host device communicates
`with the interface device by means of the
`{driver for the input/output device
`customary in a host device} {specific driver
`for the multi-purpose interface}
`
`whereupon the host device communicates with the
`interface device solely by means of the {driver for
`the input/output device customary in a host device}
`{specific driver for the multi-purpose interface}
`without resorting to specialized software installed
`on the host to facilitate communication
`
`14
`
`whereupon the host device communicates
`with the interface device by means of the
`usual driver for the input/output device
`
`whereupon the host device communicates with the
`interface device solely by means of the usual driver
`for the input/output device without resorting to
`specialized software installed on the host to
`facilitate communication
`See Reply at 2-3, 5-10; Resp. at 24-25, 35, 36, 37.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 37
`
`

`

`No Negative Limitation in the ’399 Patent …
` In contrast to related patents:
`
`Ex. 1023 at 11-12 (Final Written Decision discussing limitations of
`the ’746 patent); see also Ex. 1022 at 41-42 (Final Written Decision
`discussing limitations of the ’144 patent); Reply at 1-2, 10.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 38
`
`

`

`Imported Limitation Improper: Decision on Institution
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Institution Dec. at 17.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 39
`
`

`

`Specification Does Not Justify Importing Limitation
` Specification contradicts requirement of negative limitation. See Reply at 7-8;
`Ex. 1003 ¶88.
`- Presence of an operating system. Ex. 1001 at 5:64-67.
`
`- “[T]he user can also create a configuration file, whose entries automatically set and control various
`functions of the interface device,” including sampling time and volume of data to be acquired. Ex.
`1001 at 6:55-7:37.
`
`- Software to “perform, e.g. mail functions or monitor processes which run continuously, for example,
`in multi-tasking environments.” Ex. 1001 at 8:18-22.
`
`- Software on the interface device to perform optional data compression “of the data to be transferred
`from the data transmit/receive device to the host device.” Ex. 1001 at 9:23-28.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 40
`
`

`

`Without Papst’s (Improperly) Imported Limitation …
` “[T]he ordinary meaning of claim language as understood by a person of
`skill in the art may be readily apparent even to lay judges, and claim
`construction in such cases involves little more than the application of the
`widely accepted meaning of commonly understood words.”
`- Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Reply at 4.
` “by means of” = “With the use of : owing to”
`- Ex. 1024.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`See Reply at 6; Pet. at 53-64; Ex. 1003 at ¶¶62-83, 148.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 41
`
`

`

`Without Papst’s (Improperly) Imported Limitation …
` The independent claims are clear on their face. The limitations in question
`(limitations [1f], [11f], [14c&d]) require only:
`- (1) a handshake between interface and host; and thereafter
`- (2) communication by the recited driver
`• Driver for i/o device customary in a host (claim 1)
`• Specific driver for multi-purpose interface (claim 11)
`• Usual driver for the i/o device (claim 14)
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`See Reply at 6; Pet. at 53-64; Ex. 1003 at ¶¶62-83, 148.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 42
`
`

`

`Imported Limitation: Papst’s Shifting Sands
`
`Resp. at 24-25.
`
`Resp. at 25.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 43
`
`

`

`Imported Limitation: Papst’s Shifting Sands
`
`Resp. at 35.
`
`Resp. at 36.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 44
`
`

`

`Imported Limitation: Papst’s Shifting Sands
`
`Resp. at 37.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 45
`
`

`

`Imported Limitation: Papst Goes Too Far
` Requiring communication “solely by means of” recited drivers is not proper
` ’399 patent only requires host to use the recited driver, not to exclude any
`software facilitating communication. Reply at 10; Ex. 1003 at ¶¶42-44, 88.
` According to Dr. Almeroth:
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶43 (discussing the ’399 patent).
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 46
`
`

`

`Claim Construction
`Importing Reliability
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 47
`
`

`

`Reliability Is Not Part of the Claims
` Papst seeks further inclusion of “reliability” into the “whereupon” clause.
`
` The justification?
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Resp. at 48.
`
`Resp. at 47-48.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 48
`
`

`

`Papst thinks the claims of Aytac help. They do not.
`Compare ’399 Claim Language …
`… with Aytac’s Claim Language
`whereupon the host device
`whereby reliable access by said operating
`system at said first computer and by said
`communicates with the interface device
`operating system at said second computer
`by means of the [driver]
`to said hard disks at said second computer
`is achieved
`
`Reply at 11-12.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 49
`
`

`

`“Whereupon” Limitation: A (Second) Comparison
`Claim Actual Claim Language
`Claim Language as Rewritten by Papst
`
`1 & 11 whereupon the host device
`communicates with the interface
`device by means of the {driver for
`the input/output device
`customary in a host device}
`{specific driver for the multi-
`purpose interface}
`whereupon the host device
`communicates with the interface
`device by means of the usual
`driver for the input/output device
`
`14
`
`whereupon the host device communicates with the
`interface device solely by means of the {driver for the
`input/output device customary in a host device} {specific
`driver for the multi-purpose interface} without resorting to
`specialized software installed on the host to facilitate
`communication, whereby reliable communication between
`the host device and the interface device is achieved
`whereupon the host device communicates with the
`interface device solely by means of the usual driver for the
`input/output device without resorting to specialized
`software installed on the host to facilitate communication,
`whereby reliable communication between the host device
`and the interface device is achieved
`See Reply at 2-3, 5-10; Resp. at 47-48.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 50
`
`

`

`Reliability Not Claimed – Like the ’746 and ’144 Patents
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Ex. 1023 at 29; see Reply at 11-12.
`
`Ex. 1022 at 42; see Reply at 11-12.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 51
`
`

`

`Communication By Means of Driver
`Aytac’s ASPI Drivers
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 52
`
`

`

`Imported Limitations
`Without Imported Limitation
`Communication between the host and
`interface device of Aytac by recited drivers not
`disputed. See Institution Dec. at 18.
`• ASPI drivers satisfy customary / usual
`driver requirement (cl. 1, 14)
`• ASPI drivers satisfy multi-purpose
`interface driver requirement (cl. 11)
`
`With Imported Limitation
`Papst argues Aytac’s specialized software
`violates the imported negative limitation and
`is required for reliability. See Resp. at 35-50.
`• CATSYNC
`• CATCAS
`• CATSER
`
`See Reply at 2-4, 5, 13, 18-24.
`
` However, Aytac’s “specialized software” is irrelevant. See Reply at 2, 17-26.
`- Synchronization / cache clearing / reliability – Not claimed
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 53
`
`

`

`Aytac Specialized Software Unnecessary
`
`Resp. at 39.
`
`Resp. at 39.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 54
`
`

`

`Aytac Specialized Software Unnecessary
`
`Resp. at 49; Reply at 26.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 55
`
`

`

`Aytac Specialized Software Unnecessary for Communication
`
`Ex. 2005 at ¶41; Reply at 23; see also
`Reply at 2, 19-21, 26.
`
`Ex. 2005 at ¶45; Reply at 23; see also
`Reply at 2, 19-21, 26.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 56
`
`

`

`Aytac Specialized Software Unnecessary for Communication
`
`Ex. 2005 at ¶57; Reply at 26; see also
`Reply at 2, 19-21, 23.
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Ex. 2005 at ¶58; Reply at 26; see also Reply at 2, 19-21, 23.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 57
`
`

`

`Aytac Specialized Software Unnecessary for Reliable Data
`Transfer
`
`Ex. 2005 at ¶59 (describing a working embodiment of Aytac
`without CATSYNC); Reply at 25; see also Reply at 2, 19-21, 26.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 58
`
`

`

`Aytac Communication by ASPI Driver: Handshake
`Aytac discloses communication by means of SCSI protocols and drivers
`
`Pet. at 60 (describing Aytac handshake process);
`see also Pet. at 18-19 (describing Aytac’s
`disclosure of ASPI drivers for SCSI interface);
`Reply at 6 n.5, 14-16.
`
`Pet. at 58 (SCSI protocol); Ex. 1003 at ¶148.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 59
`
`

`

`Aytac Communication by ASPI Driver: Handshake
`Aytac discloses communication by means of SCSI protocols and drivers
`
`Pet. at 61; Ex. 1003 at ¶¶62-70; see also Pet. at 18-
`19 (describing Aytac’s disclosure of ASPI drivers for
`SCSI interface); Reply at 6 n.5, 14-16.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 59 (INQUIRY command and device types);
`Ex. 1006 at 123-27.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 60
`
`

`

`Aytac Communication by ASPI Driver: Handshake
`Aytac discloses communication by means of SCSI protocols and drivers
`
`Pet. at 19.
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶104.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 61
`
`

`

`Aytac Communication by ASPI Driver: Data Transfer
`Aytac discloses communication by means of SCSI protocols and drivers
`
`Pet. at 62.
`
`Pet. at 63 (discussing claims 1 and 11);
`see also Ex. 1003 at ¶¶142, 150-151;
`Pet. at 20; Reply at 15.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 62
`
`

`

`Aytac Communication by ASPI Driver: Data Transfer
`Aytac discloses communication by means of SCSI protocols and drivers
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 63-64 (discussing claim 14); see
`also Ex. 1003 at ¶159; Reply at 15-16.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 63
`
`

`

`Communication by ASPI Driver: Aytac Specialized Software
`Unnecessary
`
`Ex. 2006 at 26:14-18; Reply at 21.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Ex. 2006 at 25:9-19; Reply at 21.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 64
`
`

`

`Communication by ASPI Driver: Aytac Specialized Software
`Unnecessary
`
`Ex. 2006 at 29:10-18; Reply at 21.
`
`Ex. 2006 at 33:22-34:4; Reply at 21.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 65
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues: Communication by ASPI Driver
`Aytac discloses communication by means of SCSI protocols and drivers
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Reply at 19; see Resp. at 35-36 (arguing “additional”
`drivers used in combination with the ASPI driver);
`Resp. at 39 (only arguing CATSYNC in tandem with
`ASPI driver to implement synchronization).
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 66
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues: Communication by ASPI Driver
`Aytac discloses communication by means of SCSI protocols and drivers
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Institution Dec. at 18; see generally Resp. (unrebutted); see
`also Pet. at 18, 31-32, 62-63; Ex. 1003 at ¶¶104, 106, 157;
`Reply at 15, 19.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 67
`
`

`

`Aytac and ’399 Patent
`Same Means of Communication
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 68
`
`

`

`Aytac and ’399 Patent Communicate Using Same SCSI Drivers
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 55.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 69
`
`

`

`Aytac and ’399 Patent Communicate Using Same SCSI Drivers
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶142.
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶157.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 70
`
`

`

`Aytac and ’399 Patent Communicate Using Same SCSI Drivers
`
`Resp. at 7 (describing use of
`SCSI drivers in ’399 patent).
`
`Resp. at 39 (describing use
`of SCSI drivers in Aytac)
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 71
`
`

`

`Aytac and ’399 Patent Communicate Using Same SCSI Drivers
`
`Ex. 1005 at 4:49-53; Pet. at 55.
`
`Ex. 1001 at 4:40-46; Pet. at 55.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 72
`
`

`

`35 U.S.C. § 103
`No Modification of Aytac Necessary
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 73
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Mischaracterizes Petitioner’s
`Argument: No Modification of Aytac Is Required
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Resp. at 46.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 74
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Mischaracterizes Petitioner’s
`Argument: No Modification of Aytac Is Required
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Reply at 24.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 75
`
`

`

`35 U.S.C. § 103
`Motivation to Combine Prior Art
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 76
`
`

`

`Papst Arguments Concerning Motivation to Combine
`Are Meritless
` Papst suggests that Petitioner has not specifically identified limitations missing
`from Aytac. Resp. at 33-34.
` Papst is wrong. Reply at 3 n.4.
` Papst also suggests that Petitioner’s obviousness conclusion lacks evidentiary
`support. Resp. at 34.
` Papst is wrong again. Reply at 3 n.4.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 77
`
`

`

`Papst’s Meritless Argument 1: Claim Limitations
`
`Pet. at 36 (combining Aytac and Lin).
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 62 (combining Aytac and SCSI Spec.); see Reply at 3 n.4.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 78
`
`

`

`Papst’s Meritless Argument 2: Support for Combination
`of Aytac + SCSI
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 26 (citing Aytac and Dr. Almeroth’s Declaration
`for evidentiary support); see Reply at 3 n.4.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 79
`
`

`

`Papst’s Meritless Argument 2: Support for Combination
`of Aytac + SCSI
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶87; see Reply at 3 n.4.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 80
`
`

`

`Aytac Expressly Cites the SCSI Specification
`
`Aytac
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Ex. 1005 at 4:49-54; Pet. at 3,
`26-27; Ex. 1003 ¶ 87 ; see Reply
`at 3 n.4.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 81
`
`

`

`Aytac Expressly Cites the SCSI Specification
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Pet. at 27 ; see Reply at 3 n.4.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 82
`
`

`

`Papst’s Meritless Argument 2: Support for Combination
`of Aytac + Lin
`
`Pet. at 27 (citing Aytac, Dr. Almeroth’s
`Declaration, and Lin for evidentiary
`support) ; see Reply at 3 n.4.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 83
`
`

`

`Papst’s Meritless Argument 2: Support for Combination
`of Aytac + Lin
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶92 ; see
`Reply at 3 n.4.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 84
`
`

`

`Motivation to Combine References at Institution
`
`Institution Dec. at 19 ; see Reply at 3 n.4.
`
`Institution Dec. at 20 ; see Reply at 3 n.4.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2017-00714
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 85
`
`

`

`Conclusion
`Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 11, 14, and 15 Are Unpatentable
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1025, p. 86
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket