UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2017-007141
`Patent 6,470,399
`____________________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE WITH RESPECT TO
`ZTE (USA) INC.2
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317 AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`                                                            
`1 Case IPR2017-01808 has been joined with this proceeding.
`2 ZTE Corporation was identified as a Real-Party-in-Interest in the Corrected
`Petition, but was not in fact, nor was it listed in the case caption as a Petitioner.
`However, the Decision on Institution (Paper 10) included ZTE Corporation in the
`caption as a Petitioner. ZTE USA is the only ZTE entity who is properly a
`petitioner, and ZTE USA requests that the record be corrected to reflect this fact.
`The remainder of this pleading will therefore refer to ZTE USA and includes all
`ZTE entities who are actually a Petitioner.
`
`

`

` 
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317, 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72 and 42.74, and the Board’s
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`authorization of January 9, 2018, Petitioner ZTE (USA) Inc. (“ZTE”) and Patent
`
`Owner Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG (“Patent Owner” or “Papst”) jointly move
`
`to terminate the present inter partes review proceeding with respect to ZTE in light
`
`of Patent Owner and ZTE’s settlement of their disputes.
`
`ZTE and Patent Owner are concurrently filing a true and complete copy of
`
`their written Settlement Agreement in connection with this matter as required by
`
`statute. ZTE and Patent Owner certify that there are no other agreements or
`
`understandings, oral or written, between the parties, including any collateral
`
`agreements, made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of the
`
`present proceeding with respect to ZTE. A joint request to treat the Settlement
`
`Agreement as business confidential information kept separate from the file of the
`
`involved patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) is being filed concurrently.
`
`2 
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`LEGAL STANDARD
`An inter partes review proceeding “shall be terminated with respect to any
`
`petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the
`
`Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is
`
`filed.” 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). A joint motion to terminate generally “must (1) include
`
`a brief explanation as to why termination is appropriate; (2) identify all parties in
`
`any related litigation involving the patents at issue; (3) identify any related
`
`proceedings currently before the Office, and (4) discuss specifically the current
`
`status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each party to the
`
`litigation or proceeding.” Heartland Tanning, Inc. v. Sunless, Inc., IPR2014-00018,
`
`Paper No. 26, at *2 (P.T.A.B. July 28, 2014).
`
`ARGUMENT
`Termination of the present inter partes review proceeding with respect to ZTE
`
`
`
`is appropriate because (1) ZTE and Patent Owner have settled their disputes and
`
`have agreed to terminate the proceeding with respect to ZTE, (2) the Office has not
`
`yet decided the merits of the proceeding, (3) the termination with respect to ZTE
`
`will not materially affect the proceeding, and (4) public policy favors the
`
`termination.
`
`First, the Settlement Agreement completely resolves the controversy between
`
`Patent Owner and ZTE relating to the ’399 patent. ZTE (USA) Inc. and ZTE
`
`3 
`
`

`

` 
`Corporation, which are two of the real parties in interest in the present proceeding,
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`were named defendants in Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Apple Inc., No. 6:15-
`
`cv-1095-RWS (E.D. Tex) and the consolidated case Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`
`KG v. ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA), Inc., No. 6:15-cv-1100-RWS (E.D. Tex.).
`
`On December 29, 2017, ZTE and Patent Owner filed a joint motion to dismiss with
`
`prejudice all asserted claims against the ZTE entities and all asserted counterclaims
`
`by the ZTE entities.
`
`Second, although the Board has instituted trial (Paper 10), the Office has not
`
`decided the merits of the proceeding.
`
`Third, the termination with respect to ZTE will not materially affect the
`
`proceeding. ZTE’s co-petitioner Samsung will remain a petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`Samsung has already taken a lead role in this proceeding in view of the settlement
`
`between ZTE and Papst. The proceeding is therefore expected to continue with
`
`Samsung as the remaining petitioner.
`
`Fourth, public policy favors the termination. As recognized by the rules of
`
`practice before the Board:
`
`There are strong public policy reasons to favor settlement
`between the parties to a proceeding. The Board will be
`available to facilitate settlement discussions, and where
`appropriate, may require a settlement discussion as part of
`the proceeding. The Board expects that a proceeding will
`terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement, unless
`the Board has already decided the merits of the
`proceeding.
`
`4 
`
`

`

` 
`Patent Office Trial Practice Guide, Fed. Register, Vol. 77, No. 157 at 48768 (Aug.
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`14, 2012). Moreover, no public interest or other factors militate against termination
`
`of this proceeding with respect to ZTE.
`
`As to the remaining Heartland Tanning requirements, Exhibit A identifies
`
`each district court litigation that involves the ’399 patent or any related patents and
`
`discusses the current status of these related litigations. Exhibit B identifies all
`
`petitions for Inter Partes Review that have been filed against the ’399 patent or any
`
`related patent and discusses the status of each.
`
`CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, ZTE and Patent Owner jointly and respectfully
`
`
`
`request that the instant proceeding be terminated with respect to ZTE.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: January 12, 2018
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Nicholas T. Peters/
`Nicholas T. Peters
`Registration No. 53,456
`Paul B. Henkelmann
`Registration No. 65,891
`FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY,
`LLP
`120 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 1600
`Chicago, IL 60603
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`By: /Scott R. Miller/
`
`5 
`
`

`

` 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`Scott R. Miller
`Registration No. 32,276
`Darren Franklin
`Registration No. 51,701
`SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER &
`HAMPTON, LLP
`333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`(213) 620-1780
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`
`
`6 
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`Terminated
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending/Stayed
`
`Exhibit A
`Status of Litigation Involving U.S. Patent No. 6,470,399 or Related Patents
`Case Caption
`Status
`In Re Papst Licensing Digital Camera Patent Litigation,
`Pending
`MDL No. 1880 (Misc. Action No. 07-493) relating to Nos.
`07-cv-1118, 07-cv-1222, 07-cv-2086, 07-cv-2088, 08-cv-865,
`08-cv-985, 08-cv-1406, and 09-cv-530
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. HP, Inc., Case No.
`3:16-cv-00575 (N.D. Cal.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Apple, Inc., Case No.
`6:15-cv-01095 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Huawei Technologies
`Co., Ltd. et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01115 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Lenovo (United States),
`Inc. et al., Case. No. 6:15-cv-01111 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. LG Electronics, Inc. et
`al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01099 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Samsung Electronics
`Co. Ltd. et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01102 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. ZTE Corporation et al.,
`Case. No. 6:15-cv-01100 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Canon, Inc. et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-01692 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Fujifilm Corporation, et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01693 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. JVCKENWOOD
`Corporation et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01747 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Nikon Corporation, et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01748 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Olympus Corporation,
`et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01749 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Panasonic Corporation,
`et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01750 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Canon, Inc., et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-00495 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Fujifilm Corporation, et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00496 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. HP, Inc., Case No.
`1:15-cv-00497 (D. Del.)
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`7 
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`Case Caption
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. JVCKENWOOD
`Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00498 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Nikon Corporation, et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00499 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Olympus Corporation,
`et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00500 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Panasonic Corporation,
`et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00501 (D. Del.)
`Hewlett-Packard Company v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG, Case. No. 3:15-cv-02101 (N.D. Cal.)
`
`Status
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
` 
`
`
`
`8 
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`Exhibit B
`Status of Petitions for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,470,399 or
`Related Patents
`
`Status
`Patent
`8,966,144 Final
`Written
`Decision
`8,504,746 Final
`Written
`Decision
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,966,144
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746 Final
`Written
`Decision
`
`8,966,144 Final
`Written
`Decision
`
`Caption
`No.
`IPR2016-01199 Fujifilm Corporation et al. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2016-01200 Fujifilm Corporation et al. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2016-01202 Canon Inc., Canon USA Inc., and
`Canon Financial Services, Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01206 Canon Inc., Canon USA Inc., and
`Canon Financial Services, Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01211 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01212 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`
`9 
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`Patent
`
`Status
`
`8,504,746 Final
`Written
`Decision
`
`8,966,144 Final
`Written
`Decision
`
`No.
`
`Caption
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01213 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01214 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`
`10 
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`No.
`
`Caption
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01216 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01222 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01223 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`
`11 
`
`Patent
`
`Status
`
`8,966,144 Final
`Written
`Decision
`
`8,966,144
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`Patent
`
`Status
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,966,144 Final
`Written
`Decision
`
`No.
`
`Caption
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01224 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01225 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`
`12 
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
` 
`
`No.
`
`Caption
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01733 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
`and Samsung Electronics America,
`Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`IPR2016-01839 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01840 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01841 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01842 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01843 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01844 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01849 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01860 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01862 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01863 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01864 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00154 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00156 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`
`13 
`
`Patent
`
`Status
`
`9,189,437 Trial
`Instituted
`
`9,189,437
`
`9,189,437
`
`6,470,399
`
`9,189,437
`
`8,966,144
`
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`9,189,437 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`8,966,144 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`8,504,746 Trial
`Instituted
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746
`
`8,966,144
`
`9,189,437
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`Caption
`No.
`IPR2017-00158 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00415 Huawei Device Co., Ltd., LG
`Electronics, Inc., and ZTE (USA)
`Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`IPR2017-00443 Huawei Device Co., Ltd., LG
`Electronics, Inc., and ZTE (USA)
`Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`IPR2017-00448 Huawei Device Co., Ltd., LG
`Electronics, Inc., and ZTE (USA)
`Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`IPR2017-00449 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00670 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00672 LG Electronics, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-00678 LG Electronics, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-00679 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00710 Huawei Device Co. Ltd. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00711 ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00712 ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00713 ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`
`14 
`
`Patent
`8,504,746
`
`Status
`Institution
`Denied
`6,895,449 Trial
`Instituted
`
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted
`
`6,895,449
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`8,966,144 Terminated
`
`8,966,144 Trial
`instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2016-
`01225
`8,504,746 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2016-
`01211
`8,966,144 Terminated
`
`8,966,144
`
`8,504,746 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`6,895,449 Trial
`Instituted
`
`9,189,437
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`Status
`Patent
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted
`
`9,189,437 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2016-
`01733
`6,895,449 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2017-
`00415
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2017-
`00443
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2017-
`00714
`6,895,449 Pending-
`Filed After
`Joinder
`Deadline
`
` 
`
`Caption
`No.
`IPR2017-00714 ZTE (USA) Inc. and ZTE
`Corporation [sic] v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-01038 LG Electronics, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-01617 Olympus Corporation and
`Olympus American Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-01682 Olympus Corporation and
`Olympus America Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-01808 Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Samsung Electronics
`Co., Ltd., and Samsung
`Electronics America, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2018-00410 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Nikon Corporation, Nikon Inc.,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`and Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15 
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2017-00714
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,470,399
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on January 12,
`
`2018, a complete and entire copy of the foregoing paper has been served in its
`
`entirety by e-mail on counsel for Petitioners. Petitioners have agreed to electronic
`
`service.
`
`Dated: January 12, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`/Nicholas T. Peters/
`Nicholas T. Peters
`Registration No. 53,456
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`ntpete@fitcheven.com
`
`16 
`
`