`
`09/19/2017 12:53 FAX 213 620 1398
`
`SMRH LOS ANGELES
`
`'001/003
`
`
`
`a
`'
`"'
`fifififiwflgm " MEEEW
`
`Eiheppani Muiizn, Ricaie; & Hampten LLP
`333 $0129.11 I-icipe Street 43'“ Finer
`Los Angeiesa. Gaiifomia 9003’1-1522
`213.629.1278!) main
`213.626.1396 fax
`mvw.shepearcimufiin.com
`
`
`EA); {EOVER $HEEET:
`
`THiS FAX TRANSMISSiQN WILL N03” BE MAILED
`
`Date:
`
`
`September :9 2017
`
`k
`
`' LN”.--FiEe Nui‘riber JaXrJ‘$8440
`
`'
`
`Tcfisaimimber'of pages:
`if ail pages are not s‘eceived. pieese eaii
`(inciuding«pageom'ersheelt)
`Kerry S. Tuszynski at 2233.61'14i88
`
`TQ:
`'
`'
`Fax Nos:
`fgfieghone Ne.
`Finance Services:
`5?1—2?2—8500
`-
`571 273—6500
`USP?)
`mm
`
`From:
`Re:
`
`
`KerryS.imzygiekii
`Depositfixmouni 19 {8'53 Refund {2214 cm for REF rem: EF‘:22?00
`
`G’i/i 7/201"? FeeCode:1414 .
`‘
`
`MESSSIEKGE: Dear Sirs,
`
`F’iease provide a refund as it was ORDEREG that out Petition was DENEEU2”ind m inter partes
`review was instituied.
`
`Aétached'is the Li?C'SiON denying the inter Palms Review
`
`"£11.21 k you.
`
`Wm-
`
`
`
`
`'i HE “READER Of- i'HiS Mf‘q‘s-xé
`
`
`NFiDENTifigAND EXEMPT FROMDi_§(:iCESURE Uij_'3_§_._R__ALE-‘1"Iii-REL
`.
`ACRE TO THE. ii‘i'i'EHDEE) RECiF’ KENT.
`..
`THE EMPLOYEE OP. AGENT RFfifiEQNSHBLE FOR EDi-Eii‘v'tRiNC-E THE M
`
`
`
`YOUAR‘E Ht: REBY NO!'iFiED TEEA N! [ESSENWNATION. Di:VTRIEU'HON OR COPYING Di: FHIS GOME‘AUNKDA
`'5'}? STRICE'EA’ PROHEBITED.
`1? YOU
`
`
`(RN iN ERRL‘3’. PLEASE NOTi{FY US isv‘iMEWAE'Ei.‘1‘ BY TELEPHONE AND Rixl! ”(N THE OREGINAL MESSACfl E "FL" US
`HAVE RECESVED THfS'COMMUNii
`AT THE- ABOVE ADSRESE‘ ViA Ti-i‘? EJS. POSIAL SERVILE. {HANK YDL}.
`
`e i‘flRHzfiii’ad: i 24352.1
`
`PAGE 113 * RCVD AT 9I19f201? 3:54:09 PM [Eastern Dayllght Time] " SVR:W-PTOFAX-Ufl1f38 " DNIS:2?35500 " CSID:213 620 1398 * DURATION (mm-ss):00-54
`
`
`
`
`
`09/19/2017 12:54 FAX
`
`213 620 1398
`
`SMRH LOS ANGELES
`
`.002/003
`
` us -_i€3_. $1931
`Tai: 57E~2‘?2»7822
`
`-
`
`=
`
`Faper '3’
`_
`Entamd: MW 112, ”‘01?
`
`UN?"E"E.E3 STATES FATENT AND TRADEMARK ()§?¥‘E?TII<EE?.
`
`REVERE THE FATE-NT TRI..E—\L AND A.PP}3A{., Effifkflfi
`
`2TB (USA) INC.:
`Patitionen
`
`V .
`
`‘PAPS’E‘ LICENSYNG GMBH :52. CG. KG,
`-
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case {FRIED} 743872 '1
`Fawn: 8,966,344 132
`
`Before JOIN} ‘Y. CHANG, JENNIFER S. RISK, and JAMES E33. ARPW,
`Administrarive Parana: Jmfges.
`
`ARPIN, Adminiszmiiue Parent Judge,
`
`DECISION _
`Denyé‘nglnstimtion of firmer Pzzrrcas Revisw
`3? GER. 3? 42.108
`
`PAGE 213 " RCVD AT 9f1912017 3:54:09 PM [Eastern Daytlght Tlme} " SVR:W-PTOFAX-DD1I38 " DNIS:2736500 * CSID:213 520 1398 ‘ DURATION (mm-ss):ou-54
`
`
`
`
`
`09/19/2617 12:54 FAX
`
`213 620 1398
`
`SMRH L05 ANGELES
`
`@003/003
`
`EPR2017~QG'?EE
`
`Patent 8,96%. 14-4 32
`
`Accordingly, we conclude that Feiitiemr has met established a.
`
`reasonable. iikeiiheod ofprevaiiing; (m its asseriion {hat claims; 2., 2.? 3.6, 251%,
`
`28, 31, 41, "f2, 80, 83, 86, and 87 of the ’ 144 patent am ungatea‘i‘ahlfl, as;
`
`' anticipatefi bythe PCT Pubiicaiioxn
`
`IH. CGNCLUSION
`
`_
`
`For this. foz‘egéing reasons, we-dctcrmim that Petitiomr has my:
`
`establish a. magmmble: Iike‘iihood ofpwvafling on m agser‘tim: may: any of
`
`claims I, 2, 23:5, 26, 28, 31, 41., 72, 80, 83, 86, {111(187 of tha ’ 144 patmt are
`
`unpatenmbhfi.
`
`IV. ORDER .
`
`For me: foregoing reasonsj it is
`
`ORDERED that the Petition is denied, and 1m {rial isingt‘iinmd.
`
`PAGE 313 " RCVD AT 9I191201T 3:54:09 PM [Eastern Dayllght Tlme] ' SVR:W-PTOFAX-001138 " DNIS:2736500 " GSID:213 $20 1398 ‘ DURATION (mm-ss):ou-54
`
`I 8
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
