`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00701
`U.S. Patent No. 7,421,032
`_________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple Inc.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`California Institute of Technology,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slides
`U.S. Patent 7,421,032
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00701
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`May 8, 2018
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`1
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`2
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`3
`
`
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`• Claims 1 and 4–10 as obvious over Ping, MacKay,
`Divsalar, and Luby97
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`4
`
`
`
`’032 Patent Claims Combine A Conventional
`Coder With a Known Irregularity Technique
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1101 [’032 Patent] at Claim 1
`
`Pet. at 45-55; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶119-147
`
`5
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Pet. at 26
`
`Pet. at 24-31; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶62-77
`
`6
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`𝑎
`𝑥𝑗 = 𝑥𝑗−1 +
`𝑖=1
`
`𝑣 𝑗−1 𝑎+𝑖
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶128
`
`Pet. at 48
`
`7
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• (i) computing a parity bit as a sum of the previous parity bit and a
`set of randomly chosen message bits;
`
`Pet. at 49-50
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Pet. at 49-52; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶126-140
`
`8
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• (i) computing a parity bit as a sum of the previous parity bit and a
`set of randomly chosen message bits;
`
`one element 1 per column
`
`we randomly create exactly
`
`Ex. 1103 [Ping] at 38
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Pet. at 49-52; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶126-140
`
`9
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• (ii) The randomly chosen message bits are “repeats;”
`
`Ex. 1117 [Divsalar] at Fig. 3
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Pet. at 51-52; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶138-140
`
`10
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`11
`
`Pet. at 42-44; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶112-116; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶40
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶112
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`12
`
`Pet. at 42-44; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶112-116; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶40
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶113
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• Making the sequence of parity bits available for transmission in a
`transmission data stream
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`13
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 44-47, 53-55; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶88-89, 117-118, 121-125, 143-147
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶145
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`• Making the sequence of parity bits available for transmission in a
`transmission data stream
`
`Ex. 1108 [Luby97] at 150
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`14
`
`Pet. at 36-37, 44-47, 53-55; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶88-89, 117-118, 121-125, 143-147
`
`
`
`Ping, Divsalar, And Luby97 Disclose Everything
`Except Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶117-118
`
`Pet. at 44-45; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶117-118
`
`15
`
`
`
`MacKay Teaches Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1102 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`Pet. at 32-33; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶78, 80, 178
`
`16
`
`
`
`MacKay Provides Motivations To Combine
`Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1102 [MacKay] at 1449, 1452
`
`Pet. at 37-40; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶103-107
`
`17
`
`
`
`The Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`18
`
`Pet. at 40-42; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶108-111; Reply at 8-21; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶30-35
`
`Pet. at 40
`
`
`
`The Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`Reply at 8-21; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶30-35 ; Ex. 1148 [Tanner Graph for Ping]; Ex. 1149 [Tanner Graph for MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`19
`
`Reply at 12
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`20
`
`
`
`PO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`
`PO chose not to depose Petitioner’s experts
`
`• Dr. Frey (Reply Declarant)
`
`• Dr. Davis (2nd Declaration)
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.]; Ex. 1173 [Davis Decl.]
`
`21
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`22
`
`
`
`Surreply Issues
`
`CalTech Surreply Issue
`
`Issue Addressed in Briefing
`
`MacKay discloses non-uniform column weights
`
`Pet. at 32-33, 52-53; Reply at 3-4
`
`Ping discloses the LDGM of Claim 6
`
`Pet. at 24-25, 67-68; Reply at 6-7
`
`It would have been obvious to modify ping to
`be non-systematic
`
`Pet. at 9, 72-73; Reply at 7-8
`
`A POSITA would have been motivated to
`combine Ping and MacKay
`
`Pet. at 37-42; Reply at 8-21
`
`The Petition showed Reasonable Expectation of
`Success
`
`Pet. at 37-42; Reply at 8-21
`
`Experimental data demonstrates the ease of
`implementation
`
`Pet. at 39-40; Reply at 8-16
`
`Tanner graphs are supported by the petition
`
`Pet. at 24-30, 40; Reply at 11-12
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`23
`
`
`
`MacKay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`24
`
`Pet. at 32-33, 52-53; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶141-142; 178
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶107
`
`
`
`MacKay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`25
`
`Pet. at 32-33, 52-53; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶141-142; 178; Reply at 3-4; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶20-24
`
`Ex. 1102 [MacKay] at 1450, 1453
`
`
`
`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 6
`
`Paper 14 [Institution Decision] at 21-22
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`26
`
`Pet. at 24-25, 67-68; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶63-64, 184-185; Reply at 6-7; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶28
`
`
`
`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 6
`
`Pet. at 30-31
`
`Reply at 7
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`27
`
`Pet. at 24-25, 67-68; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶63-64, 184-185; Reply at 6-7; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶28
`
`
`
`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 6
`
`Pet. at 68
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`28
`
`Pet. at 24-25, 67-68; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶63-64, 184-185; Reply at 6-7; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶28
`
`
`
`It Would Have Been Obvious To Modify Ping To
`Be Non-Systematic
`
`Pet. at 9
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`29
`
`Pet. at 9, 72-73; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶31-32, 198-199; Reply at 7-8; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶29
`
`Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶29
`
`
`
`It Would Have Been Obvious To Modify Ping To
`Be Non-Systematic
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶32
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`30
`
`Pet. at 9, 72-73; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶31-32, 198-199; Reply at 7-8; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶29
`
`Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶29
`
`
`
`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶106, 108
`
`Pet. at 39-40; Reply at 8-16; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶30-40
`
`31
`
`
`
`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`* * *
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶43-44
`
`Pet. at 39-40; Reply at 8-16; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶30-40
`
`32
`
`
`
`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`Ping + McKay
`
`Ping
`
`Better Performance
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`33
`
`Noisier Channel
`
`Pet. at 39-40; Reply at 8-16; Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶30-40, 44-58
`
`Ex. 1068 [Simulation] at 9
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶56
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1165 [Frey Decl.] ¶34
`
`Reply at 11
`
`34
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1148 [Tanner graph for Ping]
`
`Pet. at 56
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`35
`
`Pet. at 24-30, 67-68; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶62-77, 149-150, 184-185
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Pet. at 39-40
`
`Ex. 1149 [Tanner graph for
`MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1451
`
`Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶107
`
`36
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1102 [MacKay] at 1450
`
`IPR2017-00701
`
`Pet. at 39-40; Ex. 1104 [Davis Decl.] at ¶107
`
`37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00701
`
`Dated: May 7, 2018
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Richard A. Goldenberg (No. 38,895)
`Dominic A. Massa (No. 44,905)
`Michael H. Smith (No. 71,190)
`Mark D. Selwyn (pro hac vice)
`James M. Dowd (pro hac vice)
`Kelvin Chan (No. 71,433)
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00701
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 7, 2018, a true and correct copy of the following:
`
` Petitioner’s Demonstratives for Oral Argument
`was served via electronic mail upon the following attorneys of record:
`
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Richard Torczon (rtorczon@wsgr.com)
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`
`
`Kelvin W. Chan (Reg. No. 71,433)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`