throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`Apple Inc.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`California Institute of Technology
`Patent Owner
`____________________________________________
`
`Case Nos. IPR2017-00210, IPR2017-00211, IPR2017-00219, IPR2017-00297,
`IPR2017-00423, IPR2017-00700, IPR2017-00701, IPR2017-00728
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JONATHAN E. BARBEE IN SUPPORT OF
`UNOPPOSED MOTIONS TO SUBMIT REPLACEMENT EXHIBITS
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 161096079v.1
`
`1
`
`Apple vs. Caltech
`IPR2017-00701
`Apple 1126
`
`

`

`1.
`
`I, Jonathan E. Barbee, am an attorney and work with the counsel of
`
`record for Petitioner Apple Inc. in the captioned inter partes review proceedings,
`
`Richard Goldenberg. I assisted Mr. Goldenberg in the preparation and filing of the
`
`petitions and accompanying exhibits in the captioned inter partes review
`
`proceedings.
`
`2.
`
`This declaration is filed in support of Petitioner’s Unopposed Motions
`
`to Correct Clerical Errors in the captioned inter partes review proceedings. I
`
`understand that these motions will be filed to correct exhibits filed with the
`
`captioned inter partes review proceedings, which are directed to U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,116,710 (the “ʼ710 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,916,781 (the “ʼ781 Patent”), and
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,421,032 (the “ʼ032 Patent”) (collectively, the “ʼ710, ʼ781, and
`
`ʼ032 IPRs”).
`
`3.
`
`Petitioner inadvertently filed incorrect versions of the following
`
`exhibits in the captioned inter partes review proceedings:
`
`• Frey, B. J. and MacKay, D. J. C., “Irregular Turbocodes,” Proc.
`
`37th Allerton Conf. on Comm., Control and Computing,
`
`Monticello, Illinois, 1999 (the “Frey exhibit”).
`
`• D. Divsalar, H. Jin, and R. J. McEliece, “Coding theorems for
`
`‘turbo-like’ codes,” Proc. 36th Allerton Conf. on Comm., Control
`
`and Computing, Allerton, Illinois, 1998 (the “Divsalar exhibit”).
`
`ActiveUS 161096079v.1
`
`2
`
`

`

`• Declaration of Paul H. Siegel (the “Siegel Declaration exhibit”).
`
`4.
`
`For each petition in the ʼ710, ʼ781, and ʼ032 IPRs, I assisted Mr.
`
`Goldenberg in collecting the exhibits for each petition and directed legal staff to
`
`upload the exhibits for each petition. Due to clerical errors, I inadvertently and
`
`unintentionally collected incorrect versions of the Frey exhibit and the Divsalar
`
`exhibit and omitted the “Exhibit 1” attached to the Siegel Declaration exhibit.
`
`Unaware of this oversight, I sent incorrect versions of these exhibits to my firm’s
`
`legal staff to be uploaded.
`
`5.
`
`For the Frey exhibit, my firm had several copies of the Frey reference
`
`in the firm’s document management database, including the inadvertently-filed
`
`exhibits. I unintentionally selected the wrong documents because the
`
`inadvertently-filed exhibits had been circulated for different purposes. The copy of
`
`the Frey reference uploaded in the ʼ710 Patent IPRs (IPR2017-00210, -00211, and
`
`-00219) and the ʼ781 Patent IPRs (IPR2017-00297 and -00423) was missing the
`
`table of contents, date stamp, and page numbering of the correct Frey exhibit. The
`
`copy of the Frey reference uploaded in the ʼ032 Patent IPRs (IPR2017-00700, -
`
`00701, and -00728) has a date stamp of September 19, 2000 from the University of
`
`Michigan Library and a September 25, 2000 date stamp from the University of
`
`Washington instead of the March 20, 2000 date stamp from the Cornell University
`
`Library that appears on the correct Frey exhibit. The copy of the Frey reference
`
`ActiveUS 161096079v.1
`
`3
`
`

`

`that I collected for the ʼ032 Patent IPRs was also missing sequential page numbers
`
`beginning with page 1, which were needed to match the citations in the petitions in
`
`the ʼ032 Patent IPRs.
`
`6.
`
`For the Divsalar exhibit, I inadvertently directed legal staff to upload
`
`the Divsalar exhibit without adding sequential page numbers beginning with page
`
`1 below the original page numbers of the exhibit. The addition of the sequential
`
`page numbers was required for the Divsalar exhibit to match the citations in the
`
`petitions for the ʼ710, ʼ781, and ʼ032 IPRs.
`
`7.
`
`For the Siegel Declaration exhibit, the Siegel Declaration and “Exhibit
`
`1” to the declaration were sent by Professor Paul H. Siegel to my firm as
`
`attachments in separate emails—I inadvertently overlooked the email attaching
`
`“Exhibit 1” while preparing the Siegel Declaration exhibit. Consequently,
`
`“Exhibit 1” to the Siegel Declaration was not attached before I directed legal staff
`
`to upload the inadvertently-filed exhibit in the ʼ710 Patent IPRs and the ʼ032
`
`Patent IPRs.
`
`8.
`
`All statements in this declaration are made under penalty of perjury
`
`and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 161096079v.1
`
`4
`
`

`

`Dated: February 28, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`Jonathan E. Barbee
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`7 World Trade Center
`250 Greenwich Street
`New York, NY 10007
`Tel: (212) 937-7275
`Fax: (212) 230-8888
`
`ActiveUS 161096079v.1
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket