`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 12
`Filed: April 12, 2017
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00700 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00701 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00728 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before KEN BARRETT and TREVOR M. JEFFERSON,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion to Submit Replacement Exhibits
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`1 This Decision will be entered in each case. The parties are not authorized
`to use this caption style. For purposes of deciding this motion, we
`understand the pertinent papers filed in the three cases to be substantively
`similar and we refer specifically to the papers filed in IPR2017-00700.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00700 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`IPR2017-00701 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`IPR2017-00728 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`
`On February 28, 2017, Petitioner filed a motion to submit replacement
`
`exhibits. Paper 10. Specifically, Petitioner seeks to replace in each of the
`above-captioned cases three exhibits, which are identified by Petitioner,
`respectively, as:
`• Frey, B. J. and MacKay, D. J. C., “Irregular Turbocodes,” Proc. 37th
`Allerton Conf. on Comm., Control and Computing, Monticello,
`Illinois, 1999 (the “Frey Reference”);
`• D. Divsalar, H. Jin, and R. J. McEliece, “Coding theorems for
`‘turbolike’ codes,” Proc. 36th Allerton Conf. on Comm., Control and
`Computing, Allerton, Illinois, 1998 (the “Divsalar Reference”); and
`• Declaration of Paul H. Siegel (the “Siegel Declaration”).
`The original documents, filed January 20, 2017, bear the following exhibit
`numbers:
`
`
`Frey
`Reference
`Ex. 1010
`Ex. 1110
`Ex. 1210
`
`Divsalar
`Reference
`Ex. 1017
`Ex. 1117
`Ex. 1217
`
`IPR2017-00700
`IPR2017-00701
`IPR2017-00728
`
`Siegel
`Declaration
`Ex. 1023
`Ex. 1123
`Ex. 1223
`
`According to Petitioner, incorrect copies of the exhibits mistakenly were
`uploaded. Motion 4. Petitioner has filed replacement copies. Petitioner
`represents that the motion is unopposed. The motion is granted.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00700 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`IPR2017-00701 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`IPR2017-00728 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is:
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s filing of replacement exhibits is
`
`authorized;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibits 1x10, 1x17, and 1x23, filed
`January 20, 2017, shall be expunged from the record in each of the above-
`captioned cases.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00700 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`IPR2017-00701 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`IPR2017-00728 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Richard Goldenberg
`Brian Seeve
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
`brian.seeve@wilmerhale.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Michael Rosato
`Matthew Argenti
`Richard Torczon
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`margenti@wsgr.com
`rtorczon@wsgr.com
`
`4
`
`