throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00700
`U.S. Patent No. 7,421,032
`_________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Apple Inc.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`California Institute of Technology,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slides
`U.S. Patent 7,421,032
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00700
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`May 8, 2018
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`1
`
`

`

`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`2
`
`

`

`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`3
`
`

`

`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`• Claims 11, 12, and 14-16 are obvious over Ping, MacKay,
`and Divsalar
`
`• Claim 13 is obvious over Ping, MacKay, Divsalar, and
`Luby97
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`4
`
`

`

`’032 Patent Claims Combine a Conventional
`Coder With A Known Irregularity Technique
`
`Ex. 1101 [’032 Patent] at Claim 11
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet. at 46-57; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶127-152
`
`5
`
`

`

`“In Accordance With The [Claimed] Tanner
`Graph”
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`DI at 9-10; Pet. 26-27; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶109-110, 130
`
`6
`
`Pet. at 48
`
`

`

`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`• “a parity bit is determined as a function of both information
`bits and other parity bits as shown by the configuration of
`nodes and edges of the Tanner graph”
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet. at 49
`
`Pet. at 48-50; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶132-134
`
`7
`
`

`

`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`• “check nodes, randomly connected to the repeated message
`bits, enforce constraints that determine parity bits”
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1003 [Ping] at 38
`
`Pet. at 54-57; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶144-151
`
`8
`
`

`

`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`• “a graph representing an [irregular repeat accumulate
`(“IRA”)] code as a set of parity checks where every message
`bit is repeated”
`
`Repeat
`
`Accumulate
`
`Ex. 1017 [Divsalar] at Fig. 3
`
`Pet. at 52
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet., 50-54; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶135-143
`
`9
`
`

`

`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`10
`
`Pet. at 43-45; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶120-124; Reply at 17-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶38
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶120
`
`

`

`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶121
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`11
`
`Pet. at 43-45; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶120-124; Reply at 17-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶38
`
`

`

`MacKay Teaches Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`Pet., 34, 51, 59; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 136, 158
`
`12
`
`

`

`MacKay Provides Motivations To Combine
`Irregularity With Ping And Divsalar
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449, 1452
`
`Pet., 39-43; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.], ¶¶111-119
`
`13
`
`

`

`The Modification Of Ping Would Have Been
`Simple
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`14
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶116; Reply at 14; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶41
`
`Pet. at 42
`
`

`

`The Modification Of Ping Would Have Been
`Simple
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`15
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at 17; Ex. 1048 [Tanner Graph for Ping]; Ex. 1149 [Tanner Graph for MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`Reply at 9
`
`

`

`PO Chose Not to Depose Petitioner’s Experts
`
`• Dr. Frey (Reply Declarant)
`
`• Dr. Davis (2nd Declaration)
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`16
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.]; Ex. 1073 [Davis Decl.]; Paper 47 [Opp. to Motion to Exclude] at 10
`
`

`

`Surreply Issues
`
`CalTech Surreply Issue
`
`Issue Addressed in Briefing
`
`MacKay discloses non-uniform column weights
`
`Pet. at 33-34, 41-42; Ex. 1065; Reply at 2-5, 18-
`20
`
`MacKay discloses non-uniform row weights
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Reply at 18-20
`
`A POSITA would have been motivated to
`combine Ping and MacKay
`
`Pet. at 39-43; Reply at 14-15
`
`Ping discloses a Low Density Generator Matrix
`(LDGM)
`
`Pet. at 67-69; Reply at 20-21
`
`The Petition showed Reasonable Expectation
`of Success
`
`Pet. at 39-43; Reply at 6-18
`
`Experimental data demonstrates ease of
`implementation
`
`Pet. at 40-42; Reply at 14-18
`
`Tanner graphs are supported by the petitions
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33, 41-42, 53; Reply at 8
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`17
`
`

`

`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`18
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶158; Reply at 18-20; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶58-59
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`

`

`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶115
`
`Pet., 41-42; Reply at 2-5; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶20-27
`
`19
`
`

`

`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1450, 1453
`
`Pet., 41-42; Reply at 2-5; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶20-27
`
`20
`
`

`

`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Row Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`21
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶158, 165-166; Reply at 18-20; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶58-59
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`

`

`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Row Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`22
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶158, 165-166; Reply at 18-20; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶58-59
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶158
`
`

`

`MacKay Provides A Motivation To Use Non-
`Uniform Row Weights With Ping and Divsalar
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`23
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶158, 165-166; Reply at 18-20; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶58-59
`
`

`

`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 13
`
`Paper 14 [Institution Decision] at 21
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`24
`
`Pet. at 67-69; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶179-187; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶60
`
`

`

`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 13
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`25
`
`Pet. at 67-69; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶179-187; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶60
`
`Pet. at 32
`
`

`

`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 13
`
`Reply at 20-21
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`26
`
`Pet. at 67-69; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶179-187; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶60
`
`

`

`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 13
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`27
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶179-187; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶60
`
`Pet. at 67-68
`
`

`

`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶114, 116
`
`Pet. at 40-42; Reply at 14-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.], ¶¶41-56
`
`28
`
`

`

`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`* * *
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶41-42
`
`Pet. at 40-42; Reply at 14-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.], ¶¶41-56
`
`29
`
`

`

`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`Ping + McKay
`
`Ping
`
`Better Perfomance
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Noisier Channel
`
`Pet. at 40-42; Reply at 14-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.], ¶¶41-56
`
`Ex. 1068 [Simulation] at 9
`
`30
`
`

`

`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 56
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶31
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet. at 18; Reply at 8
`
`31
`
`

`

`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1048 [Tanner Graph for Ping]
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet. at 67-68
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶179-180
`
`32
`
`

`

`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Pet. at 41-42
`
`Ex. 1049 [Tanner Graph for
`MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1451
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33, 41-42, 53; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶141-142, 179-180
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`33
`
`

`

`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1450
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`34
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33, 41-42, 53; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶141-142, 179-180
`
`

`

`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`35
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33, 41-42, 53; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶141-142, 179-180
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶141-142
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00700
`
`Dated: May 7, 2018
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Richard A. Goldenberg (No. 38,895)
`Dominic A. Massa (No. 44,905)
`Michael H. Smith (No. 71,190)
`Mark D. Selwyn (pro hac vice)
`James M. Dowd (pro hac vice)
`Kelvin Chan (No. 71,433)
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00700
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 7, 2018, a true and correct copy of the following:
`
` Petitioner’s Demonstratives for Oral Argument
`was served via electronic mail upon the following attorneys of record:
`
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Richard Torczon (rtorczon@wsgr.com)
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Kelvin W. Chan (Reg. No. 71,433)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket