`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00700
`U.S. Patent No. 7,421,032
`_________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple Inc.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`California Institute of Technology,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slides
`U.S. Patent 7,421,032
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00700
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`May 8, 2018
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`1
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`2
`
`
`
`Roadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure To Cross-Examine
`
`Response To Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`3
`
`
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`• Claims 11, 12, and 14-16 are obvious over Ping, MacKay,
`and Divsalar
`
`• Claim 13 is obvious over Ping, MacKay, Divsalar, and
`Luby97
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`4
`
`
`
`’032 Patent Claims Combine a Conventional
`Coder With A Known Irregularity Technique
`
`Ex. 1101 [’032 Patent] at Claim 11
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet. at 46-57; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶127-152
`
`5
`
`
`
`“In Accordance With The [Claimed] Tanner
`Graph”
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`DI at 9-10; Pet. 26-27; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶109-110, 130
`
`6
`
`Pet. at 48
`
`
`
`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`• “a parity bit is determined as a function of both information
`bits and other parity bits as shown by the configuration of
`nodes and edges of the Tanner graph”
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet. at 49
`
`Pet. at 48-50; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶132-134
`
`7
`
`
`
`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`• “check nodes, randomly connected to the repeated message
`bits, enforce constraints that determine parity bits”
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1003 [Ping] at 38
`
`Pet. at 54-57; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶144-151
`
`8
`
`
`
`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`• “a graph representing an [irregular repeat accumulate
`(“IRA”)] code as a set of parity checks where every message
`bit is repeated”
`
`Repeat
`
`Accumulate
`
`Ex. 1017 [Divsalar] at Fig. 3
`
`Pet. at 52
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet., 50-54; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶135-143
`
`9
`
`
`
`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`10
`
`Pet. at 43-45; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶120-124; Reply at 17-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶38
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶120
`
`
`
`Ping and Divsalar Disclose Everything Except
`Irregularity
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶121
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`11
`
`Pet. at 43-45; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶120-124; Reply at 17-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶38
`
`
`
`MacKay Teaches Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`Pet., 34, 51, 59; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 136, 158
`
`12
`
`
`
`MacKay Provides Motivations To Combine
`Irregularity With Ping And Divsalar
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449, 1452
`
`Pet., 39-43; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.], ¶¶111-119
`
`13
`
`
`
`The Modification Of Ping Would Have Been
`Simple
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`14
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶116; Reply at 14; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶41
`
`Pet. at 42
`
`
`
`The Modification Of Ping Would Have Been
`Simple
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`15
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at 17; Ex. 1048 [Tanner Graph for Ping]; Ex. 1149 [Tanner Graph for MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`Reply at 9
`
`
`
`PO Chose Not to Depose Petitioner’s Experts
`
`• Dr. Frey (Reply Declarant)
`
`• Dr. Davis (2nd Declaration)
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`16
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.]; Ex. 1073 [Davis Decl.]; Paper 47 [Opp. to Motion to Exclude] at 10
`
`
`
`Surreply Issues
`
`CalTech Surreply Issue
`
`Issue Addressed in Briefing
`
`MacKay discloses non-uniform column weights
`
`Pet. at 33-34, 41-42; Ex. 1065; Reply at 2-5, 18-
`20
`
`MacKay discloses non-uniform row weights
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Reply at 18-20
`
`A POSITA would have been motivated to
`combine Ping and MacKay
`
`Pet. at 39-43; Reply at 14-15
`
`Ping discloses a Low Density Generator Matrix
`(LDGM)
`
`Pet. at 67-69; Reply at 20-21
`
`The Petition showed Reasonable Expectation
`of Success
`
`Pet. at 39-43; Reply at 6-18
`
`Experimental data demonstrates ease of
`implementation
`
`Pet. at 40-42; Reply at 14-18
`
`Tanner graphs are supported by the petitions
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33, 41-42, 53; Reply at 8
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`17
`
`
`
`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`18
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶158; Reply at 18-20; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶58-59
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`
`
`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶115
`
`Pet., 41-42; Reply at 2-5; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶20-27
`
`19
`
`
`
`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Column Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1450, 1453
`
`Pet., 41-42; Reply at 2-5; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶20-27
`
`20
`
`
`
`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Row Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`21
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶158, 165-166; Reply at 18-20; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶58-59
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`
`
`Mackay Discloses Non-Uniform Row Weights
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`22
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶158, 165-166; Reply at 18-20; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶58-59
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶158
`
`
`
`MacKay Provides A Motivation To Use Non-
`Uniform Row Weights With Ping and Divsalar
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1449
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`23
`
`Pet. at 33-34; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶158, 165-166; Reply at 18-20; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶58-59
`
`
`
`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 13
`
`Paper 14 [Institution Decision] at 21
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`24
`
`Pet. at 67-69; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶179-187; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶60
`
`
`
`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 13
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`25
`
`Pet. at 67-69; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶179-187; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶60
`
`Pet. at 32
`
`
`
`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 13
`
`Reply at 20-21
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`26
`
`Pet. at 67-69; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶179-187; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶60
`
`
`
`Ping Discloses The LDGM Of Claim 13
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`27
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶179-187; Reply at 20-21; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶60
`
`Pet. at 67-68
`
`
`
`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶114, 116
`
`Pet. at 40-42; Reply at 14-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.], ¶¶41-56
`
`28
`
`
`
`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`* * *
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶41-42
`
`Pet. at 40-42; Reply at 14-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.], ¶¶41-56
`
`29
`
`
`
`Experimental Data Demonstrates The Ease Of
`Implementation
`
`Ping + McKay
`
`Ping
`
`Better Perfomance
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Noisier Channel
`
`Pet. at 40-42; Reply at 14-18; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.], ¶¶41-56
`
`Ex. 1068 [Simulation] at 9
`
`30
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 56
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶31
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet. at 18; Reply at 8
`
`31
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1048 [Tanner Graph for Ping]
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`Pet. at 67-68
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶179-180
`
`32
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Pet. at 41-42
`
`Ex. 1049 [Tanner Graph for
`MacKay Profile 93y]
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1451
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33, 41-42, 53; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶141-142, 179-180
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`33
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`Ex. 1002 [MacKay] at 1450
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`34
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33, 41-42, 53; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶141-142, 179-180
`
`
`
`Tanner Graphs Are Supported By The Petition
`
`IPR2017-00700
`
`35
`
`Pet. at 18, 27-33, 41-42, 53; Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] ¶¶141-142, 179-180
`
`Ex. 1004 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶141-142
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00700
`
`Dated: May 7, 2018
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Richard A. Goldenberg (No. 38,895)
`Dominic A. Massa (No. 44,905)
`Michael H. Smith (No. 71,190)
`Mark D. Selwyn (pro hac vice)
`James M. Dowd (pro hac vice)
`Kelvin Chan (No. 71,433)
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00700
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 7, 2018, a true and correct copy of the following:
`
` Petitioner’s Demonstratives for Oral Argument
`was served via electronic mail upon the following attorneys of record:
`
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Richard Torczon (rtorczon@wsgr.com)
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Kelvin W. Chan (Reg. No. 71,433)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`