throbber

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`LG Electronics, Inc.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`FastVDO LLC
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Patent No. 5,850,482
`______________________
`
`Inter Parte Review No. ____________
`
`___________________________________________________________
`
`June 9, 2016 email exchange with FastVDO re claim construction
`
`Exhibit 1012
`
`

`

`Noonen, Martin
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Reza Mirzaie <rmirzaie@raklaw.com>
`Thursday, June 09, 2016 9:37 PM
`Marando, Christopher
`cconkle@raklaw.com; FastVDO_JDG@orrick.com; fastvdo@raklaw.com
`Re: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions &
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Thanks, Chris. No, those cites are not part of our proposed structure.
`
`Reza
`
`
`On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Marando, Christopher <Christopher.Marando@weil.com> wrote:
`
`Hi Reza, 
`

`Further to our call last night, can you please provide an update concerning FastVDO’s position on the 
`corresponding structures for the means plus function claims? Specifically, can you indicate whether 
`FastVDO contends that the specification cites following the “See, e.g.” language are included in 
`FastVDO’s proposals for the corresponding structure?
`

`Thanks,  
`Chris

`
`<image002.jpg>
`

`Christopher T. Marando

`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005-3314
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`+1 202 682 7094 Direct
`+1 202 857 0940 Fax
`
`
`

`From: Marando, Christopher
`Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 10:10 PM
`To: 'Reza Mirzaie'
`Cc: cconkle@raklaw.com; FastVDO_JDG@orrick.com; fastvdo@raklaw.com
`Subject: RE: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions & Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`Thanks, Reza. Let’s plan to discuss tomorrow at 2:30pm pacific. We can use the following dial in: 1‐888‐
`235‐7501, 2026827094.

`
`<image003.jpg>
`
`1
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 1
`
`

`

`

`Christopher T. Marando

`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005-3314
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`+1 202 682 7094 Direct
`+1 202 857 0940 Fax
`
`

`From: Reza Mirzaie [mailto:rmirzaie@raklaw.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 7:50 PM
`To: Marando, Christopher
`Cc: cconkle@raklaw.com; FastVDO_JDG@orrick.com; fastvdo@raklaw.com
`Subject: Re: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions & Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`Hello Chris,
`
`
`Thanks for the follow up email. This covers the same points raised in your May 25th email. As
`we previously discussed, we do not think our contentions are deficient. We also believe
`Defendants’ excessive delay in raising these issues not only confirms the sufficiency of
`FastVDO’s disclosures, but also renders any potential dispute moot under Judge Gallo’s rules,
`including Rule IV(C) and (F).
`
`I am available tomorrow afternoon around 2:30 pm Pacific to discuss this further and also Friday
`morning.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Reza
`
`
`
`On Jun 6, 2016, at 6:24 PM, Marando, Christopher <Christopher.Marando@weil.com> wrote:
`
`Counsel,
`

`FastVDO’s amended preliminary claim constructions served on 6/1 identified numerous 
`proposed structures for the means plus function elements of claims 7‐11 and 22‐26. 
`FastVDO’s infringement contentions for these claims, however, did not provide the 
`identity of these structures as required by the Court’s Scheduling Order. Dkt. 125 
`(requiring that Plaintiff’s contentions include a “chart identifying specifically where each 
`element of each asserted claim is found within each Accused Instrumentality, including 
`for each element that such party contends is governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112(6), the 
`identity of the structure(s), act(s), or material(s) in the Accused Instrumentality that 
`performs the claimed function”) (emphasis added). 
`

`Please confirm that FastVDO will supplement its infringement contentions for these 
`claims to identify the accused structures no later than 6/7, or else confirm that FastVDO 
`is no longer asserting claims 7‐11 and 22‐26. If FastVDO is unwilling or unable to do so, 
`please provide a time on 6/7 or 6/8 when FastVDO is available to meet and confer.

`
`2
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 2
`
`

`

`As we noted previously, the substantive deficiencies in FastVDO’s infringement 
`contentions have prejudiced Defendants’ ability to fully analyze and consider the alleged 
`scope of the asserted claim limitations in advance of the deadlines to serve proposed 
`claim constructions. Defendants continue to reserve the right to serve modified claim 
`constructions.
`

`Thanks,
`Chris

`
`<image002.jpg>
`

`Christopher T. Marando

`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005-3314
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`+1 202 682 7094 Direct
`+1 202 857 0940 Fax
`
`
`
`

`From: Reza Mirzaie [mailto:rmirzaie@raklaw.com]
`Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 2:27 AM
`To: Marando, Christopher
`Cc: Christian W. Conkle; oppfastvdomaster@raklaw.com; fastvdo@raklaw.com; Nikeisha
`Wilson
`Subject: Re: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions
`& Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`Hello Chris,
`
`
`Yes, FastVDO currently continues to assert claims 7-11 and 22-26.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Reza
`
`
`Reza Mirzaie
`Russ August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`(310) 979-8251
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`On Jun 2, 2016, at 10:03 AM, Marando, Christopher
`<Christopher.Marando@weil.com> wrote:
`
`
`Counsel,
`

`Can you confirm that FastVDO is continuing to assert claims 7‐11 and 
`22‐26?
`
`3
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 3
`
`

`

`

`Thanks,
`Chris

`
`<image001.jpg>
`

`Christopher T. Marando

`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005-3314
`christopher.marando@weil.com
`+1 202 682 7094 Direct
`+1 202 857 0940 Fax
`
`
`
`
`

`From: Christian W. Conkle [mailto:cconkle@raklaw.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 11:35 PM
`To: oppfastvdomaster@raklaw.com
`Cc: fastvdo@raklaw.com; Nikeisha Wilson
`Subject: FastVDO v AT&T - FastVDO First Amended Preliminary Claim
`Constructions & Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`Please see the attached first amended claim constructions of
`plaintiff FastVDO LLC.
`
`
`Thank you,
`
`
`Christian W. Conkle
`Russ, August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`310 826-7474
`310 826-6991 Fax
`cconkle@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The information contained in this email message is intended only for use
`of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is
`not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to
`deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
`dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
`prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
`immediately notify us by email, postmaster@weil.com, and destroy the
`original message. Thank you.
`
`4
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual
`or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
`employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
`notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
`prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us
`by email, postmaster@weil.com, and destroy the original message. Thank you.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named
`above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to
`deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
`of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
`immediately notify us by email, postmaster@weil.com, and destroy the original message. Thank you.
`
`
`
`5
`
`Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012 Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket