throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FASTVDO LLC
`Patent Owner.
`
`_______________
`Case IPR2017-00683
`Patent 5,850,482
`
`_______________
`
`REPLY OF PETITIONER LGE TO THE OPPOSITION BY PATENT
`OWNER FASTVDO TO PETITIONERS REQUEST TO JOIN THE
`CURRENT PROCEEDING WITH IPR2016-01203
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2017-00683
`Patent No. 5,850,482
`
`When LGE asked for this joinder, it asked to act only as the “understudy”
`
`which means LGE basically just observes, while Apple would be in the primary
`
`role, until such time (if any) when Apple settles with the Patent Owner. LGE cited
`
`recent PTAB precedent which approved and supported this approach. In so doing,
`
`LGE specifically proposed that once the joinder was granted, LGE would only file
`
`a pleading (not exceeding five pages) if, after consultation with Apple, LGE
`
`believed that for record preservation purposes only it needed to present a differing
`
`position. LGE deems it unlikely that it ever would have to do such in its
`
`understudy role. Apple agreed to this provision with LGE.
`
`One alternative cited by FVDO in its Opposition (using other precedent)
`
`would require that LGE first seek permission of the PTAB before filing such an
`
`alternative pleading.
`
`LGE has no objection to this alternative and will submit to whatever
`
`procedure the PTAB requires, should it grant LGE’s Request for Joinder. The
`
`remainder of FVDO contentions were previously addressed by LGE as required by
`
`the PTAB Rules and the operative law in LGE’s Request for Joinder made.
`
`Dated: February 21, 2017
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/David N. Makous/
`David N. Makous
`Registration No.: 29,559
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2017-00683
`Patent No. 5,850,482
`
`Lee, Hong, Degerman, Kang
`&Waimey
`660 S. Figueroa St., Suite 2300
`Los Angeles, California 90017-3543
`P: (213) 244-7064
`F: (213) 623-2211
`Attorney for Petitioner LG
`Electronics, Inc.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2017-00683
`Patent No. 5,850,482
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on February 21, 2017, a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing Reply of Petitioner LGE to the Opposition by Patent Owner FastVDO to
`
`Petitioners Request to Join the Current Proceeding with IPR2016-01203 was
`
`served via email, by consent, to Petitioner by serving the correspondence email
`
`addresses of record as follows:
`
`Wayne M. Helge, Reg. No. 56,905
`whelge@dbjg.com
`Walter D. Davis, Reg. No. 45,137
`wdavis@dbjg.com
`Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Dr., Ste 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`Telephone: (571)765-7700
`Facsimile: (571)765-7200
`
`By:
`
`/David N. Makous/
`Registration No. 29,559
`Attorney for Petitioner LG
`Electronics, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket