`
`PATENT
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In re Application of:
`Amir SHOJAEI
`
`Application No.: 11/383,066
`Filed: May 12, 2006
`
`:
`
`Customer Number: 20277
`Confirmation Number: 7083
`
`Group Art Unit: 1618
`Examiner: Micah Paul YOUNG
`
`For:
`
`CONTROLLED DOSE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM
`
`AMENDMENT
`
`Mail Stop Amendment
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313 -1 450
`
`Sir:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`This is in response to the non-final Office Action mailed October 2, 2009.
`
`A petition for a One-Month Extension of Time accompanies this response.
`
`Amendments to the Specification begin on page 2 of this paper.
`
`Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of the claims beginning on page 3
`
`of this paper.
`
`Remarksmrguments begin on page 7 of this paper.
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 1
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p.
`1
`
`
`
`Application No.:
`
`l1!383,066
`
`Docket No.: 085199-0034
`
`Amendments to the Specification
`
`Please replace the paragraph beginning at page 16, line 7 with the following paragraph:
`
`“Immediate” and “delayed” release refer to the onset of release in relationship to
`
`administration of the drug. “Immediate” means that the release of drug begins very soon,
`
`within a relatively short time afier administration, e.g. a few minutes or less. “Delayed”
`
`means that the release of drug is postponed, and begins or is triggered some period of
`
`time after administration (e.g., the lag time), typically a relatively long period of time,
`
`e.g- more than one hour.
`
`2
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 2
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 2
`
`
`
`Application No.:
`
`ll)'383,066
`
`Docket No.: 085199-0034
`
`Amendments to the Claims
`
`1.
`
`(Original) A pharmaceutical composition comprising: (a) an immediate release
`
`bead comprising at least one amphetamine salt; (b) a first delayed release bead comprising at
`
`least one amphetamine salt; and (c) a second delayed release bead comprising at least one
`
`amphetamine salt; wherein the first delayed release bead provides pulsed release of the at least
`
`one amphetamine salt and the second delayed release bead provides sustained release of the at
`
`least one amphetamine salt.
`
`2.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the first delayed
`
`release bead and the second delayed release bead comprise an enteric coating.
`
`3.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 2, wherein the enteric
`
`coating is pH dependent.
`
`4.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 2, wherein the first delayed
`
`release bead and the second delayed release bead comprise different enteric coatings.
`
`5.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 2, wherein the first delayed
`
`release bead and the second delayed release bead comprise the same enteric coating.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein administration of
`
`a 37.5 mg dose of the pharmaceutical composition to a human patient results in a d-amphetamine
`
`Cm” of about 50 ng/ml.
`
`8.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the d-
`
`amphetamine area under the curve from time 0 to the last measured time (AUCo.|a5;) after
`
`administration of a 37.5 mg dose of the pharmaceutical composition to a human patient is about
`
`1058 nghr/ml.
`
`9.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the d-
`
`amphetamine area under the curve from time 0 to time infinity (AUCg-;,,f) after administration of
`
`a 37.5 mg dose of the pharmaceutical composition to a human patient is about 1035 nghr/ml.
`
`3
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 3
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 3
`
`
`
`Application No.:
`
`ll!383,066
`
`Docket No.: 085199-0034
`
`10.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the d-
`
`amphetamine Tm,‘
`
`is about 8.2 hours after administration of a 37.5 mg dose of the
`
`pharmaceutical composition to a human patient.
`
`11.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the 1-
`
`arnphetamine Cm-ax after administration of a 37.5 mg dose of the pharmaceutical composition to a
`
`human patient is about 15 ng/ml.
`
`12.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherei.n the
`
`l—
`
`amphetamine area under the curve from time 0 to the last measured time (AUCo-1a5.) after
`
`administration of a 37.5 mg dose of the pharmaceutical composition to a human patient is about
`
`354 nghr/ml.
`
`13.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the
`
`l-
`
`arnphetamine area under the curve from time 0 to time infinity (AUCo-[nf) after administration of
`
`a 37.5 mg dose of the pharmaceutical composition to a human patient is about 373 nghr/ml.
`
`14.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical
`
`composition of claim 1, wherein the 1-
`
`amphetamine Tmx is about 8.4 hours after administration of a 37.5 mg dose of the
`
`pharmaceutical composition to a human patient.
`
`15.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the immediate
`
`release bead and at least one delayed release bead are present on a single core.
`
`16.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the immediate
`
`release bead and at least one delayed release head are present on different cores.
`
`17.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one
`
`amphetamine salt is coated onto a core.
`
`18.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one
`
`amphetamine salt is incorporated into a core.
`
`19.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 2, which further comprises a
`
`protective layer over at least one enteric coating.
`
`4
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 4
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 4
`
`
`
`Application No.:
`
`ll!383,066
`
`Docket No.: 035199-0034
`
`20.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 2, which fiirther comprises a
`
`protective layer between the amphetamine salt and at least one enteric coating.
`
`21.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one
`
`amphetamine salt
`
`is selected from the group consisting of dextroamphetamine sulfate,
`
`dextroamphetamine saccharate, amphetamine aspartate monohydrate, amphetamine sulfate, and
`
`mixtures thereof.
`
`22.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 21, wherein the at least one
`
`amphetamine salt is a mixture of dextroamphetamine sulfate, dextroamphetamjne saccharate,
`
`amphetamine aspartate monohydrate, and amphetamine sulfate.
`
`23.
`
`(Original) The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the composition
`
`does not exhibit a food effect.
`
`24.
`
`(Currently amended) The composition of claim [6] 1, wherein the amount of at
`
`least one amphetamine salt is about 12.5 mg.
`
`25.
`
`(Currently amended) The composition of claim [6] _I_, wherein the amount of at
`
`least one amphetamine salt is about 18.75 mg.
`
`26.
`
`(Currently amended) The composition of claim [6] 1, wherein the amount of at
`
`least one amphetamine salt is about 25 mg.
`
`27.
`
`(Currently amended) The composition of claim [6] 1, wherein the amount of at
`
`least one amphetamine salt is about 31.25 mg.
`
`28.
`
`(Currently amended) The composition of claim [6] 1, wherein the amount of at
`
`least one amphetamine salt is about 37.5 mg.
`
`29.
`
`(Currently amended) The composition of claim [6] 1, wherein the amount of at
`
`least one amphetamine salt is about 43.75 mg.
`
`30.
`
`(Currently amended) The composition of claim [6] L, wherein the amount of at
`
`least one amphetamine salt is about 50 mg.
`
`5
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 5
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 5
`
`
`
`Application No.: 11/383,066
`
`Docket No.: 085199-0034
`
`31.
`
`(Currently amended) The composition of claim [6] 1, wherein the amount of at
`
`least one amphetamine salt is about 62.5 mg.
`
`32.
`
`(Currently amended) The composition of claim [6] 1, wherein the amount of at
`
`least one amphetamine salt is about 75 mg.
`
`33-61 . (Canceled)
`
`5
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 6
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 6
`
`
`
`Application No.: 11/333,066
`
`Docket No.: 085199-0034
`
`Remarksllargyments
`
`Claims 1-32 and 59-61 were pending before this amendment. Claims 6 and 59-61 have
`
`been canceled. Claims 24-32 have been amended to depend from claim 1 instead of claim 6.
`
`Amendments to the Specification
`
`The paragraph beginning at page 16, line 7 includes a typographical error, i.e., an extra
`
`quotation mark: “’Immediate’ and ‘delayed’ release’ refer to . . .” The typographical error has
`
`been corrected by amending the specification to delete the quotation mark after “release.”
`
`The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph
`
`Claims 6 and 59-61 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph. This
`
`rejection is rendered moot by the cancellation of claims 6 and 59-61.
`
`The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Claims 1-23, 25, 26 and 59-61 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated
`
`by U.S. Patent No. 6,605,300. According to the Examiner, the ‘300 patent discloses an oral
`
`pulsed release formulation comprising a combination of immediate release and delayed release
`
`amphetamine beads. Office Action, p. 3. Further, according to the Examiner, the ‘300 patent
`
`discloses the instantly claimed enteric coating, enteric polymers, bead structure, amphetamine
`
`salt mixture, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Office Action, p. 3-4.
`
`Applicants respectfiilly traverse this rejection. The cancellation of claims 6 and 59-61
`
`renders the rejection moot as to these claims. Claim 1, the only remaining independent claim,
`
`requires:
`
`(a) an immediate release bead comprising at least one amphetamine salt;
`
`(b) a first delayed release bead comprising at least one amphetamine salt wherein
`
`the first delayed release bead provides pulsed release of the at
`
`least one
`
`amphetamine salt; and
`
`7
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 7
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 7
`
`
`
`Application No.: 1 1/383,066
`
`Docket No.: 085199-0034
`
`(c) a second delayed release bead comprising at least one amphetamine salt,
`
`wherein second delayed release bead provides sustained release of the at least one
`
`amphetamine salt.
`
`"A claim is anticipated only if each and every element as set forth in the claim is found,
`
`either expressly or inherently described, in a single prior art reference." MPEP 2131 (quoting
`
`Verdegaa! Bros. v. Union 01’! Co. 0fCahfornia, 814 F.2d 628, 631, 2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 1937)).
`
`Claim 1 and the claims dependent thereon are not anticipated for at least the reasons that
`
`the ‘300 patent does not disclose the claim elements of: (1) a 3-bead composition (immediate
`
`release bead, delayed pulsed release bead, and sustained release bead), and (2) a bead providing
`
`sustained release. The ‘300 patent discloses immediate release beads and delayed pulsed release
`
`beads, but not sustained release beads. Sustained release is not the same as delayed pulsed
`
`release. For example, the ‘300 patent states that: “[p]ulsed dose delivery systems
`
`have been
`
`studied to address the aforementioned problematic areas for sustained release preparations." ‘300
`
`patent, col. 1,
`
`l. 64 » col. 2, l. 1. Thus, a pulsed dose delivery system is not the same as a
`
`sustained release formulation but, according to the ‘300 patent, is something to be used in place
`
`of a sustained release preparation. The diiference between pulsed release and sustained release
`
`is that, upon initiation of release, a delayed pulsed release formulation releases the drug rapidly
`
`and completely, “i.e., the entire dose is released within about 30-60 minutes ...” ‘300 patent, col.
`
`4, 11. 4-10.
`
`In contrast, sustained release means that the delivery of drug goes on for an extended
`
`period of time after initial onset, typically for more than one hour. Specification, p. 16, 11. 17-19.
`
`For the reasons stated above, the ‘300 patent does not disclose every element of the instant
`
`claims. Thus, this rejection should be withdrawn.
`
`The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`Claims 1-32 and 59-61 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the
`
`‘300 patent. According to the Examiner, in the ‘30O patent: “[t]he general conditions of the
`
`claim have been met, namely a pharmaceutical dosage fonn comprising immediate release and
`
`sustained release beads ...” Ofiice Action, p. 5. Applicants respectfully disagree and traverse
`
`this rejection.
`
`3
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 8
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 8
`
`
`
`Application No.: 11f383,066
`
`Docket No.: 085199-0034
`
`The cancellation of claims 6 and 59-61 renders the rejection moot as to these claims. The
`
`remaining claims include claim 1 and claims dependent thereon.
`
`Claim 1 requires:
`
`(a) an immediate release bead comprising at least one amphetamine salt;
`
`(b) a first delayed release bead comprising at least one amphetamine salt wherein
`
`the first delayed release bead provides pulsed release of the at
`
`least one
`
`amphetamine salt; and
`
`(c) a second delayed release bead comprising at least one amphetamine salt,
`
`wherein second delayed release bead provides sustained release of the at least one
`
`amphetamine salt.
`
`The ‘300 patent does not disclose a sustained release bead. The delayed pulsed release
`
`beads disclosed in the ‘300 patent are not the same as a sustained release bead for the reasons set
`
`forth above. Further, the ‘300 patent does not disclose a pharmaceutical composition comprising
`
`3-beads, i.e., an immediate release head, a delayed pulsed release bead, and a sustained release
`
`bead. Further yet, the ‘300 patent does not provide any teaching, suggestion, or motivation that
`
`would have led one of ordinary skill to modify the ‘300 patent to add a sustained release bead
`
`and arrive at the claimed invention. Even if such suggestion or motivation was provided (it was
`
`not), the results would not have been predictable because the ‘300 patent teaches that sustained
`
`release do not work for amphetamines. The ‘300 patent discloses that there were problems with
`
`sustained release amphetamine formulations and that “[p]ulsed dose delivery systems
`
`have
`
`been studied to address the aforementioned problematic areas for sustained release preparations.”
`
`‘300 patent, col. 1, l. 64 —- col. 2, 1. 1.
`
`The ‘300 patent teaches that pulsed dose delivery systems can be used in place of
`
`sustained release preparations. The ‘300 patent does not provide any teaching or suggestion for
`
`including both pulsed dose and sustained release formulations in the same composition. The
`
`‘300 patent teaches that sustained release amphetamine formulations are problematic and that
`
`delayed pulsed release formulations can be used instead. Thus, the ‘300 patent teaches (1) not to
`
`use sustained release amphetamine fonnulations and (2) to use a delayed pulsed release
`
`formulation instead. In view of this teaching, one of ordinary skill in the art would not have used
`
`9
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 9
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 9
`
`
`
`Application No.:
`
`llf383,066
`
`Docket No.: 085199-0034
`
`a sustained release formulation, nor used a sustained release formulation along with a delayed
`
`pulsed release formulation (instead of as an alternative to a delayed pulsed release formulation).
`
`Thus, for the reasons stated above, this rejection should be withdrawn.
`
`Conclusion
`
`This application is believed to be in condition for allowance.
`
`If any issues remain that
`
`can be addressed by a supplemental or Exarninefs amendment, the Examiner is respectfully
`
`requested to contact the undersigned.
`
`To the extent necessary, a petition for an extension of time under 37 C.F.R. 1.136 is
`
`hereby made. Please charge any shortage in fees due in connection with the filing of this paper,
`
`including extension of time fees, to Deposit Account 5004]? and please credit any excess fees to
`
`such deposit account.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`
`/A///W
`
`Paul M. Zagar
`Registration No. 52,392
`
`Please recognize our Customer No. 2027'?‘
`as our correspondence address.
`
`Attention: Patent Docketing Dept.
`600 13"‘ Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005-3096
`Phone: 212.547.5400 PMZ:MWE
`
`Facsimile: 202.756.8087
`
`Date: January 29, 2010
`
`10
`
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 10
`Amerigen Ex. 1008, p. 10
`
`