`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
`ASHEVILLE DIVISION
`
`WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FACEBOOK, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No. 15-cv-102
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Windy City Innovations, LLC (“Windy City”) files this Original Complaint
`
`against Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) for patent infringement under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271 and alleges, based on its own personal knowledge with respect to its own
`
`actions and based upon information and belief with respect to all others’ actions, as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Windy City is a limited liability company organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Delaware, and maintains its principal place of business at 195
`
`North Harbor Drive, Suite 5403, Chicago, Illinois 60601.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Facebook, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its headquarters at
`
`1601 Willow Road, Menlo Park, California 94025. Facebook is registered to conduct
`
`business in the State of North Carolina. Facebook has designated Corporation Service
`
`Company, 327 Hillsborough St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 as its agent for service of
`
`process.
`
`1
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 2 of 11
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to
`
`28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`4.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Facebook because, among other
`
`things, Facebook has committed acts of patent infringement and/or has induced and
`
`contributed to acts of patent infringement by others in North Carolina, including in this
`
`district, and has engaged in continuous and systematic activities in North Carolina, including
`
`the operation of its 160-acre data center in Rutherford County located at 284 Social Circle,
`
`Forest City, North Carolina 28043.
`
`5.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 1391(c) and
`
`1400(b) because, among other things, Facebook is subject to personal jurisdiction in this
`
`district, Facebook has regularly conducted business in this judicial district, Facebook has a
`
`regularly established place of business in this judicial district in Rutherford County at 284
`
`Social Circle, Forest City, North Carolina 28043, and certain of the acts complained of herein
`
`occurred in this judicial district.
`
`PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`6.
`
`On March 26, 2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,407,356 (the “’356 patent”) entitled “Real Time
`
`Communications System.” A true and correct copy of the ’356 patent is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit A.
`
`7.
`
`On June 4, 2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,458,245 (the “’245 patent”) entitled “Real Time
`
`2
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 2
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 3 of 11
`
`Communications System.” A true and correct copy of the ’245 patent is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit B.
`
`8.
`
`On June 25, 2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,473,552 (the “’552 patent”) entitled “Communications
`
`System.” A true and correct copy of the ’552 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
`
`9.
`
`On April 8, 2014, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued U.S. Patent No. 8,694,657 (the “’657 patent”) entitled “Real Time
`
`Communications System.” A true and correct copy of the ’657 patent is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit D.
`
`10.
`
`By assignment, Windy City owns all rights, title, and interest in the ’356, ’245,
`
`’552, and ’657 patents (the “patents-in-suit”) and possesses all rights of recovery.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`11.
`
`The patents-in-suit generally cover a real time communications system for
`
`managing and facilitating communication of digital data, including different media types
`
`across networks. The patents-in-suit also generally cover a computer network (i.e., a server
`
`network) that arbitrates permissions and distribution of multimedia information messages
`
`utilizing, for example, an application program interface (“API”).
`
`12.
`
`In or around the year 1996, Daniel Marks, the inventor of the patents-in-suit,
`
`was hired by executives at American Information Systems and asked to develop a
`
`communications system for employees at American Information Systems to more easily
`
`communicate and share various types of information over the Internet.
`
`13.
`
`Daniel Marks thereafter designed and developed a computerized
`
`communications system with software that, inter alia, creates a virtual connection among
`
`
`
`3
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 3
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 4 of 11
`
`individual computers via the Internet, permits access to the connection in accordance with
`
`predefined rules (e.g., user identity), arbitrates communications in accordance with predefined
`
`rules, and provides an application programming interface multiplexing and demultiplexing
`
`communications by message type.
`
`14.
`
`Daniel Marks is the named inventor on six issued patents claiming various
`
`aspects of his inventions. For example, some embodiments feature a controller computer that
`
`arbitrates communications between participator computers, using predefined rules and
`
`parameter, such as user identities and censorship settings. As another example, some
`
`embodiments feature a controller computer with an application programming interface that
`
`multiplexes and demultiplexes messages and creates a virtual connection between, for
`
`example, channels, private messages, and multimedia objects between the controller computer
`
`and participator computers. As yet another example, some embodiments feature a controller
`
`computer that facilitates communication of digital data between participator computers by
`
`using, for example, authenticated user identities and pointer-triggered messages to fetch
`
`digital communication data.
`
`15.
`
`In addition to his involvement with Windy City, Daniel Marks currently serves
`
`as an Associate Research Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and
`
`Computer Engineering at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina.
`
`16.
`
`Facebook owns and operates the widely used website located on the World
`
`Wide Web at http://www.facebook.com (“Facebook.com”). Facebook.com offers
`
`functionality that enables Facebook users to create and virtually connect to a network of
`
`contacts, share multimedia files with all or some of those contacts, establish private groups,
`
`customize privacy settings, and communicate in real time via Facebook’s chat and messages
`
`4
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 4
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 5 of 11
`
`functionalities. Facebook.com’s private group, chat, and messages features are real time
`
`communications systems for communicating different media types over the Internet, and also
`
`arbitrate permissions and distribution of multimedia information messages utilizing, for
`
`example, an application program interface (e.g., Facebook’s internal APIs, Facebook’s APIs
`
`for developers). “Facebook.com” refers to the Facebook.com website, client software
`
`(including, e.g., plug-ins, third-party applications, or helper applications), Facebook’s internal
`
`and developer APIs, servers and computers that are used to support the described
`
`functionalities, including facilitating communications and virtual connections between users
`
`of Facebook.com, and includes any improvements, modifications, enhancements, fixes,
`
`updates, upgrades and future versions through trial.
`
`17.
`
`Facebook uses its website to obtain advertising revenue by placing
`
`advertisements on its web pages.
`
`18.
`
`Facebook offers mobile apps, including the Facebook app and the Facebook
`
`Messenger app (“Facebook apps”). Facebook apps offer functionality that enables Facebook
`
`users to create and virtually connect to a network of contacts, share multimedia files with all
`
`or some of those contacts, establish private chats, customize privacy settings, and
`
`communicate in real time. The Facebook apps offer the functionality to communicate
`
`different media types over the Internet, and also arbitrate permissions and distribution of
`
`multimedia information messages utilizing, for example, an application program interface
`
`(e.g., Facebook’s internal APIs, Facebook’s APIs for developers). “Facebook apps” refers to
`
`the Facebook app, the Facebook Messenger app, client software (including, e.g., plug-ins,
`
`third-party applications, or helper applications), Facebook’s internal and developer APIs,
`
`servers and computers that are used to support the described functionalities, including
`
`
`
`5
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 5
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 6 of 11
`
`facilitating communications and virtual connections between users of the Facebook apps, and
`
`includes any improvements, modifications, enhancements, fixes, updates, upgrades and future
`
`versions through trial.
`
`19.
`
`Facebook offers these apps for download on mobile devices, including for
`
`example, iOS devices through Apple’s App Store, Windows Phones and Microsoft Surface
`
`tablets through the Windows Store, Android devices through Google’s Play Store, and
`
`Amazon devices through Amazon’s Appstore.
`
`20.
`
`Facebook.com and the Facebook apps are collectively referred to as
`
`“Facebook’s Accused Instrumentalities.”
`
`COUNT ONE: PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY FACEBOOK
`
`21.
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`22.
`
`As described below, Facebook has infringed and continues to infringe the
`
`patents-in-suit.
`
`23.
`
`Facebook’s Accused Instrumentalities meet claims of the patents-in-suit. For
`
`example, Facebook includes or operates a controller computer that arbitrates communications
`
`between participator computers of end users, using predefined rules and parameters, such as
`
`user identities (e.g., Facebook accounts or account identifiers, etc.) and censorship settings
`
`(e.g., blocked users, private chat settings, private groups, privacy settings, muted
`
`conversations, device capability restrictions, etc.). As another example, Facebook includes or
`
`operates a controller computer with an application programming interface (e.g., Facebook’s
`
`internal APIs, Facebook’s APIs for developers, etc.) that multiplexes and demultiplexes
`
`messages and creates a virtual connection between, for example, channels, private messages,
`
`
`
`6
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 6
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 7 of 11
`
`and multimedia objects (e.g., private groups, private chats, group chats, video chats, messages
`
`with text, hyperlinks, video, audio, or graphics, etc.) between the controller computer and
`
`participator computers of end users. As yet another example, Facebook includes or operates a
`
`controller computer that facilitates communication of digital data (e.g., text, hyperlinks, video,
`
`audio, or graphics, etc.) between participator computers of end users by using, for example,
`
`authenticated user identities (e.g., Facebook accounts or identifiers, etc.) and pointer-triggered
`
`messages (e.g., messages, including notifications, with URLs, IP addresses, or other
`
`location/address identifiers, etc.) to fetch digital communication data.
`
`24.
`
`Facebook makes, uses, provides, sells and/or imports Facebook’s Accused
`
`Instrumentalities within the United States or into the United States without authority from
`
`Windy City.
`
`25.
`
`Facebook therefore infringes the patents-in-suit under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) with
`
`Facebook’s Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`26.
`
`Facebook has actual knowledge of all patents-in-suit at least as of the filing of
`
`this Complaint for Patent Infringement.
`
`27.
`
`Facebook indirectly infringes the patents-in-suit by inducing infringement by
`
`others, such as end-users and application developers, because Facebook, for example,
`
`instructs and/or requires these third parties to make, use, sell, offer to sell or import
`
`Facebook’s Accused Instrumentalities in or into the United States. Facebook additionally
`
`indirectly infringes the patents-in-suit by encouraging, facilitating and instructing its users to
`
`use the inventions while they use Facebook’s Accused Instrumentalities. Facebook does this
`
`by, without limitation, modifying, in response to user actions, the configuration of user
`
`computers and devices and by encouraging users to use their computers and devices, so
`
`7
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 7
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 8 of 11
`
`modified, to interact with Facebook’s Accused Instrumentalities, thereby inducing use of the
`
`claimed inventions. Facebook also provides APIs for use by application developers.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`Facebook takes the above actions intending to cause infringing acts by others.
`
`Facebook is aware of the patents-in-suit and knows that others’ actions, if
`
`taken, would constitute infringement of those patents. Alternatively, Facebook believes there
`
`is a high probability that others would infringe the patents-in-suit but remains willfully blind
`
`to the infringing nature of others’ actions. Facebook therefore infringes the patents-in-suit
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`30.
`
`Facebook indirectly infringes the patents-in-suit by contributing to
`
`infringement by others, such as end-users and application developers, by providing within the
`
`United States software components for operating Facebook’s Accused Instrumentalities and
`
`interacting with end user client software and platforms. These software components are
`
`known by Facebook to be especially made or adapted for use in Facebook’s Accused
`
`Instrumentalities. These software components constitute a material part of the inventions
`
`claimed in the patents-in-suit, and are used to practice one or more processes/methods
`
`covered by the claims of the patents-in-suit. Such Facebook-related components are, for
`
`example, the software components that perform the authentication functionality claimed in the
`
`patents-in-suit, the software components that query Facebook servers to perform arbitration of
`
`computer connections, the software components comprising Facebook’s internal APIs and
`
`APIs for application developers, the software components that perform the multiplexing and
`
`demultiplexing of messages, and the software components that install Facebook’s Accused
`
`Instrumentalities on a computer or server.
`
`31.
`
`Facebook knows these Facebook-related components to be especially made or
`
`8
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 8
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 9 of 11
`
`especially adapted for use in an infringement of the patents-in-suit and are not a staple article
`
`or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. Alternatively,
`
`Facebook believes there is a high probability that others would infringe the patents-in-suit but
`
`remains willfully blind to the infringing nature of others’ actions. Facebook therefore
`
`infringes the patents-in-suit under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`
`32.
`
`Facebook’s acts of infringement have caused damage to Windy City. Windy
`
`City is entitled to recover from Facebook the damages sustained by Windy City as a result of
`
`Facebook’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. In addition, the infringing acts
`
`and practices of Facebook have caused, are causing, and, unless such acts and practices are
`
`enjoined by the Court, will continue to cause immediate and irreparable harm to Windy City
`
`for which there is no adequate remedy at law, and for which Windy City is entitled to
`
`injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. § 283.
`
`33.
`
`To the extent that Facebook releases any new version of Facebook’s Accused
`
`Instrumentalities, such instrumentalities meet the claims of the patents-in-suit and infringe 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(a)-(c) in ways analogous to Facebook’s current infringement described above.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Plaintiff hereby demands a jury for all issues so triable.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`1.
`
`A judgment that Facebook has directly infringed the patents-in-suit, contributorily
`
`infringed the patents-in-suit, and/or induced the infringement of the patents-in-suit;
`
`2.
`
`A preliminary and permanent injunction preventing Facebook and its officers,
`
`directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, licensees, successors, and assigns, and those in
`
`
`
`9
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 9
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 10 of 11
`
`active concert or participation with it, from directly infringing, contributorily infringing, and/or
`
`inducing the infringement of the patents-in-suit;
`
`3.
`
`A ruling that this case be found to be exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285, and a
`
`judgment awarding to Plaintiff its attorneys’ fees incurred in prosecuting this action;
`
`4.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Facebook to pay Plaintiff damages under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284, including supplemental damages for any continuing post-verdict infringement up
`
`until entry of final judgment, with an accounting, as needed;
`
`5.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Facebook to pay Plaintiff the costs of this action
`
`(including all disbursements);
`
`6.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Facebook to pay Plaintiff pre-judgment and post-
`
`judgment interest on the damages awarded;
`
`7.
`
`A judgment and order requiring that in the event a permanent injunction
`
`preventing future acts of infringement is not granted, that Plaintiff be awarded a compulsory
`
`ongoing licensing fee; and
`
`8.
`
`Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`10
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 10
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 Page 11 of 11
`
`Dated: June 2, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`s/Philip S. Anderson
`N.C. Bar Nº 21323
`s/Robert B. Long, Jr.
`N.C. Bar Nº 2787
`Long, Parker, Warren, Anderson &
`Payne, P.A.
`14 South Pack Square, Suite 600
`Asheville, North Carolina 28801
`Telephone: 828/258-2296
`Fax: 828/253-1073
`email: philip@longparker.com
`email: fran@longparker.com
`
`CALDWELL CASSADY & CURRY
`
`/s/ Bradley W. Caldwell
`Bradley W. Caldwell
`Texas State Bar No. 24040630
`(Pro Hac Vice Motion to be filed)
`Email: bcaldwell@caldwellcc.com
`Jason D. Cassady
`Texas State Bar No. 24045625
`(Pro Hac Vice Motion to be filed)
`Email: jcassady@caldwellcc.com
`John Austin Curry
`Texas State Bar No. 24059636
`(Pro Hac Vice Motion to be filed)
`Email: acurry@caldwellcc.com
`Warren J. McCarty
`Illinois State Bar No. 6313452
`Email: wmccarty@caldwellcc.com
`(Pro Hac Vice Motion to be filed)
`CALDWELL CASSADY & CURRY
`2101 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 1000
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: (214) 888-4848
`Facsimile: (214) 888-4849
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC
`
`11
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1016
`IPR2017-00659 - Page 11
`
`