throbber

`
`Review Paper
`
`Excipients used in lyophilization of small molecules
`
`Ankit Baheti , Lokesh Kumar , Arvind K. Bansal
`a
`b
`
`b*
`
`a
`
`b
`
`Department of Pharmaceutical Technology (Formulations) National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)
`Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar, Punjab-160062, India
`
`Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar,
`Punjab-160062, India
`
`Received 12 March 2010; Accepted: 7 May 2010
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`This review deals with the excipients used in various lyophilized formulations of small molecules.
`The role of excipients such as bulking agents, buffering agents, tonicity modifiers, antimicrobial
`agents, surfactants and co-solvents has been discussed. Additionally, a decision making process for
`their incorporation into the formulation matrix has been proposed. A list of ingredients used in
`lyophilized formulations marketed in USA has been created based on a survey of the Physician Desk
`Reference (PDR) and the Handbook on Injectable Drugs. Information on the recommended
`quantities of various excipients has also been provided, based on the details given in the Inactive
`Ingredient Guide (IIG).
`
`KEY WORDS: Lyophilization, excipients, bulking agent, small molecule, primary drying
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Lyophilization, or freeze drying, is a process in
`which water is frozen, followed by its removal
`from
`the sample,
`initially by sublimation
`(primary drying) and
`then by desorption
`(secondary drying).
`In
`this process,
`the
`moisture content of the product is reduced to
`such a
`low
`level that does not support
`biological growth or chemical reactions. The
`
`* Corresponding author: Department of Pharmaceutics,
`National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
`(NIPER) Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar, Punjab-160062, India, Tel:
`+91-172-2214682, Fax: +91-172-2214692, e-mail:
`akbansal@niper.ac.in
`
`in
`therefore, finds special use
`technique,
`formulation development of drugs which are
`thermolabile and/or unstable
`in aqueous
`medium (1-3).
`
`Lyophilization is based on the principle of
`sublimation of ice, without entering the liquid
`phase. The phase diagram of water (Figure 1)
`show that two phases coexist along a line under
`the given conditions of
`temperature and
`pressure, while at the triple point (0.0075 °C at
`0.61kPa or 610 Nm ; 0.01 °C at 0.00603 atm),
`-2
`all three phases coexist. Lyophilization
`is
`performed at
`temperature and pressure
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 41
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 1
`
`

`

`conditions below the triple point, to enable
`sublimation of
`ice. The entire process
`is
`performed at low temperature and pressure,
`hence is suited for drying of thermolabile
`compounds.
`
`Steps involved in lyophilization start from
`sample preparation
`followed by
`freezing,
`primary drying and secondary drying, to obtain
`the final dried product with desired moisture
`content (Figure 2). The concentration gradient
`of water vapor between the drying front and
`condenser is the driving force for removal of
`water during lyophilization. The vapor pressure
`of water
`increases with an
`increase
`in
`temperature during
`the primary drying.
`Therefore, primary drying temperature should
`be kept as high as possible, but below the
`critical process temperature, to avoid a loss of
`cake structure
`(4-6). This critical process
`temperature is the collapse temperature for
`amorphous substance, or eutectic melt for the
`crystalline substance (1, 7, 8).
`
`During freezing, ice crystals start separating out
`until
`the
`solution becomes maximally
`concentrated. On
`further cooling, phase
`separation of the solute and ice takes place.
`
`Review Paper
`
`Figure 2. Steps involved in lyophilization from sample
`preparation to final product formation. Annealing is an
`optional step, occasionally used
`to crystallize
`the
`formulation component(s).
`
`If the solute separates out in crystalline form, it
`is known as the eutectic temperature. In
`contrast, if an amorphous form is formed, the
`temperature is referred to as the glass transition
`temperature (T ’).
`g
`
`Determination of this critical temperature is
`important for development of an optimized
`lyophilization cycle. During primary drying,
`drying temperature should not exceed the
`critical temperature, which otherwise leads to
`‘meltback’ or ‘collapse’ phenomenon in case of
`crystalline or amorphous substance respectively
`(Figure 3).
`
`In the majority of lyophilized formulations,
`excipients are
`included
`to
`improve
`the
`functional properties and stability of
`the
`
`Figure 1 Phase diagram showing the triple point of water
`at 0.01°C, 0.00603 atm. Lyophilization is carried out
`below the triple point to enable conversion of ice into
`vapor, without entering the liquid phase (known as
`sublimation).
`
`Figure 3 Flowchart showing the concept of eutectic
`temperature and T , and their importance during
`g
`primary drying
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 42
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 2
`
`

`

`Review Paper
`
`CRI TERIA FOR SELECTION O F
`EXCIPIENTS
`
`lyophilized
`in a
`Selection of excipients
`formulation employs a need based approach, to
`develop a
`simple,
`stable and elegant
`formulation, with an economical process.
`Figure 6 depicts a flow chart for selection of
`different excipients for lyophilization of small
`molecules.
`
`EXCIPIENTS FOR LYOPHILIZATION OF
`SMALL MOLECULES
`
`Bulking agent
`
`Bulking agents, as the name implies, form the
`bulk of the lyophilized product and provide an
`adequate structure to the cake. These are
`generally used for low dose (high potency)
`drugs that per se do not have the necessary bulk
`to support their own structure. These are
`particularly more important when the total solid
`content is less than 2% (17). In such cases, a
`bulking agent is added to the formulation
`matrix (18, 19). The structure of the lyophilized
`
`lyophilized product. The International Pharma-
`ceutical Excipients Council has defined
`excipients as: “…substances
`other
`than
`the
`pharmacologically active drug or prodrug which are
`included in the manufacturing process or are contained
`in a finished pharmaceutical product dosage form” (9).
`Excipients also provide an aesthetic appeal to
`the product in terms of good cake structure.
`Inclusion of excipients also helps in developing
`a robust and economical lyophilization process.
`
`Neema et al. listed the excipients and frequency
`of
`their usage
`in marketed
`injectable
`formulations (10). Polwell et al. tabulated all the
`excipients used in parenteral formulation with
`reference to individual products (11). Strickley
`compiled the parenteral formulation of small
`molecules marketed in the United States (12-
`14). However,
`to our knowledge, a
`comprehensive analysis of the excipients used
`in lyophilization of small molecules does not
`exist in the literature, until now. This review
`therefore focuses specifically on the issues
`related to excipient selection in lyophilized
`formulations of small molecules. Proteins and
`peptides have not been included in the scope of
`this article. A comprehensive list of excipients
`used
`in
`lyophilized formulations of small
`molecules marketed in USA has been compiled
`from
`the Physician Desk Reference and
`Handbook on Injectable Drugs. Finally, the
`regulatory status of these excipients with
`respect to limits mentioned in IIG has been
`compiled.
`
`Table 1 lists the excipients used in marketed
`lyophilized preparations, highlighting
`the
`frequency of
`their use
`in
`lyophilized
`formulations (Figure 4). About 67% of the
`lyophilized marketed preparations of small
`molecules contain excipient(s)
`in
`their
`formulation.
`
`CLASSIFICATION OF EXCIPIENTS
`
`The excipients commonly used
`in
`lyophilization of small molecules have been
`classified in Figure 5.
`
`Figure 4 Distribution of commonly used excipients in
`marketed lyophilized formulations of small molecules.
`About 67% of marketed lyophilized formulations of small
`molecules contain excipients.
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 43
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 3
`
`

`

`Table 1 List of excipients used in lyophilized formulation of small molecules, as marketed in USA (15, 16)
`
`Review Paper
`
`Drug
`
`Amifostine
`
`Category
`
`Excipients
`
`Route of administration
`
`Marketed name
`
`Cytoprotective agent
`
`-
`
`IV infusion over 15-30 min
`
`Amphotericin B cholesteryl
`sulfate
`
`Antifungal
`
`Amphotericin B
`
`Antifunal
`
`Sodium cholesteryl sulfate
`Lactose
`Tris
`EDTA
`
`Hydrogenated
`soyaphosphatidylcholine
`Disteroylphosphatidly glycerol
`Cholesterol
`Alpha tocopherol
`Sucrose
`Disodium succinate
`
`-
`
`-
`
`á-cyclodextrin
`Lactose
`
`Lactose
`Sodium citrate
`Benzyl alcohol
`
`IV infusion at 3-4 mg/kg/hr
`
`Ethyol (MedImmune

`Oncology)
`
`Amphotec (Sequus

`Pharmaceuticals)
`
`IV infusion at 3-5 mg/kg/hr
`
`Ambisome (Astellas)

`
`IV infusion over 1 hr
`
`IV infusion
`
`Intracavernosal
`
`Intracavernosal
`
`IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`IV infusion
`
`IM, IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`IV infusion
`
`IM, IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`IM, IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`Zovirax ®
`(Glaxo Wellcome)
`
`Aloprim (Nabi

`Biopharmaceuticals)
`
`Edex ®
`(Schwarz Pharma)
`
`Caverject (Phamacia and

`Upjohn)
`
`Imuran ®
`(Glaxo Wellcome)
`
`Zithromax (Pfizer)
`

`
`Azactam ®
`(Bristol Myers Squibb)
`
`BiCNU ®
`(Bristol Myers Squibb)
`
`Kefzol®
` (Lilly)
`
`Ancef ®
`(GlaxoSmith-Kline)
`
`Acyclovir sodium
`
`Allopurinol sodium
`
`Alprostadil
`
`Alprostadil
`
`Azathioprine sodium
`
`Azithromycin
`
`Aztreonam
`
`Carmustine
`
`Cefazolin sodium
`
`Cefazolin sodium
`
`Antiviral
`
`Anti-gout
`
`Erectile dysfunction
`
`Erectile dysfunction
`
`Immunosuppressive
`antimetabolite; management
`of severe rheumatoid arthritis
`
`-
`
`Antibiotic
`
`Antibiotic
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Antibiotic
`
`Antibiotic
`
`Citric acid
`
`L- arginine
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Chlorothiazide sodium
`
`Diuretic and hypertensive
`
`Mannitol
`Thiomersol
`
`Cisplatin
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`IV infusion
`
`Diuril ®
`(Merck)
`

`
`Diltiazem
`
`Antianginal
`
`Mannitol
`
`IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`Intratracheal
`
`Platinol (Bristol Myers
`Oncology)
`
`Exosurf neonatal (Glaxo
`Wellcome)
`

`
`IM, IV bolus, IV infusion, IP,
`Intrapleural
`
`Cytoxan ®
`(Bristol Myers Squibb)
`
`IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`Cosmegen (Merck)
`

`
`IV bolus, IV infusion over 1 hr
`
`Dantrium (Procter & Gamble)
`

`
`IV infusion
`
`IV
`
`IV
`
`Cerubidine (Bedford)
`

`

`
`Zinecard (Pharmacia &
`Upjohn)
`

`
`Cardizem (Hoechst Marion
`Roussel)
`
`Rubex (Bristol Myers Squibb)
`

`
`IV infusion over 30-60 min
`
`IV infusion
`
`Etopophos (Bristol Myers
`Squibb)
`

`
`Flolan (Glaxo Wellcome)
`

`
`Slow IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`Sodium edecrin (Merck)
`

`
`IV infusion over 30 min
`
`Fludara (Berlex)
`

`
`IV infusion at 5mg/kg over 1
`hr
`
`Cytovene (Roche)
`

`
`Colfosceril palmitrate
`
`Prevention and treatment of
`respiratorydisease syndrome
`in low birth weight infants
`
`Cyclophosphamide
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Dactinomycin
`
`Dantrolene sodium
`
`Daunorubicin HCl
`
`Dexrazoxane
`
`Antibiotic
`
`Muscle relaxant
`
`Antibiotic
`
`Cardioprotective agent
`
`-
`
`Mannitol
`Sodium chloride
`
`Cetyl alcohol
`Tyloxapol
`Sodium chloride
`
`Mannitol
`
`Mannitol
`
`Mannitol
`
`Mannitol
`
`Doxorubicin HCl
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Etoposide phosphate
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Epoprostenol sodium
`
`Antihypertensive
`
`Ethacrynate sodium
`
`Diuretic
`
`Fludarabine phosphate
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Lactose
`Methyl paraben
`
`Sodium citrate
`Dextran 40
`
`Mannitol
`Sodium chloride
`Glycine
`
`Mannitol
`
`Mannitol
`
`Ganciclovir sodium
`
`Treatment of CMV retinitis in
`immunocompromized patient
`
`-
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 44
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 4
`
`

`

`Review Paper
`
`Table 1 List of excipients used in lyophilized formulation of small molecules, as marketed in USA (15, 16)
`
`Drug
`
`Gemcitabine HCl
`
`Hemin
`
`Category
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Treatment of acute
`intermittent porphyria related
`to mensuration
`
`Excipients
`
`Mannitol
`Sodium acetate
`
`Sorbitol
`Sodium carbonate
`
`Route of administration
`
`Marketed name
`
`IV infusion over 30 min
`
`Genzer (Lilly)

`
`IV infusion
`
`Panhematin (Abbott)

`
`Hydromorphone HCl
`
`Opioid analgesic
`
`Indomethacin sodium
`
`NSAID
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Lansoprazole
`
`Proton pump inhibitor
`
`Mannitol
`Meglumine
`Sodium hydroxide
`
`IV, IM, SC
`
`IV bolus
`
`IV
`
`Levothyroxine sodium
`
`Hormone relacement
`
`Mannitol
`Sodium phosphate tribasic
`
`IM, IV
`
`Dilaudid-HP (Abbott)

`
`Indocin I.V. (Merck)

`
`Prevacid (TAP)

`
`Synthrod (Knoll)

`
`Melphalan HCl
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Povidone
`Diluent: Water, propylene
`glycol, ethyl alcohol, sodium
`citrate
`
`IV infusion over 15-20 min
`
`Alkeran (Celgene)

`
`Methohexital sodium
`
`Anesthetic
`
`Anhydrous sodium carbonate
`
`IV, IM
`
`Brevital sodium (KING)

`
`Methyl prednisolone succinate
`sodium
`
`Hormone replacement
`
`Sodium phosphate
`Lactose
`Benzyl alcohol
`
`IM, IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`Solu-Medrol (Pfizer)

`
`Metronidazole
`
`Mitomycin
`
`Antibacterial
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Pamidronate disodium
`
`Inhibition of bone resorption
`
`Pentostatin
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Phentolamine mesylate
`
`Antihypertensive
`
`Pipecuronium bromide
`
`Long acting neuromuscular
`blocking agent
`
`Mannitol
`
`Lactose
`
`Mannitol
`
`Mannitol
`
`Mannnitol
`
`-
`
`-
`
`IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`Flagyl (Pfizer)
`

`
`IV infusion
`
`IV
`
`Mutramycin (Bristol Myers
`Squibb)
`

`
`Aredia (Novartis)
`

`
`Slow IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`Nipent (Supergen)
`

`
`IM, IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`Regitine (Novartis)
`

`
`IV bolus
`
`Arduran (Oryannon)
`

`
`IV bolus, IV infusion
`

`
`Pralidoxime chloride
`
`Remifentanil HCl
`
`Streptozocin
`
`Antidote for overdose due to
`anticholinesterase
`
`Analgesic
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Tazobactam sodium and
`Piperacillin sodium
`
`Antibacterial combination
`
`Glycine
`
`Citric acid
`
`EDTA
`Sodium citrate
`
`Thipental sodium
`
`Short acting anesthetic
`
`Sodium carbonate
`
`Thiotepa
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`-
`
`Thiothixene HCl
`
`Ticarcillin disodium
`
`Tigecycline
`
`Topotecan
`
`Antipsychotic
`
`Antibacterial
`
`Antibacterial
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Trimetrexate glucuronate
`
`Treatment of pneumonia
`
`Vancomycin HCl
`
`Antibiotic
`
`Vecuronium bromide
`
`Muscle relaxant
`
`Vinblastine sulfate
`
`Warfarin sodium
`
`Antineoplastic
`
`Anticoagulant
`
`Mannitol
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Mannitol
`Tartaric acid
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Mannitol
`Citric acid
`Sodium phosphate dibasic
`
`-
`
`Mannitol
`Sodium chloride
`Sodium
`phosphate,monobasic,
`monohydrate
`Sodium phosphate, dibasic,
`heptahydrate
`
`IV infusion
`
`IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`IV infusion
`
`IV infusion
`
`IV bolus, Intracavitary,
`Intravesical
`
`Protopam (Baxter
`Healthcare)
`
`Ultiva (GlaxoWellcome)
`

`

`
`Zanosar (Pharmacia &
`Upjohn)
`
`Zosyn (Lederle)
`

`
`Pentothal sodium (Baxter)
`

`
`Thioplex (Immunex)
`

`
`IM
`
`Navane (Pfizer)
`

`
`IM, IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`Ticar (Smith Kline Beecham)
`

`
`IV infusion
`
`IV infusion
`
`IV infusion
`
`IV infusion
`
`IV bolus, IV infusion
`
`IV bolus
`
`Slow IV over 2 min
`
`Tygacil (Wyeth)
`

`

`
`Hycamtin (Smith Kline
`Beecham)
`
`Neutrexin (U.S. Biosciences)
`

`
`Vancocin HCl (Lilly)
`

`
`Norcuron (Organon)
`

`
`Velban (Lilly)
`

`
`Coumandin (Bristol Myers
`Squibb)
`

`
`HCl – hydrochloric acid; i.v. – intravenous; i.m. – intramuscular; s.c. – subcutaneous; PDR- Physicians Desk Reference; EDTA – ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 45
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 5
`
`

`

`Review Paper
`
`Figure 5 Classification of commonly used excipients used in lyophilization of small
`molecules. A need based approach is utilized to select the appropriate excipient(s) for
`lyophilization.
`
`cake is important, since proper cake formation
`leads to proper pore formation that provides
`the means for vapor to escape from the
`product during the drying cycle. Loss of
`product structure blocks the path for vapor
`removal leading to an increased resistance in
`moisture removal and thus higher moisture
`content in the final product (Figure 7). Such
`localized high moisture content may lead to
`degradation of
`the active pharmaceutical
`ingredient during the shelf life. Kovalcik and
`Guillory demonstrated the need of a bulking
`agent for cyclophosphamide. They also showed
`that the moisture containing cake showed
`better stability with mannitol, than with lactose
`as bulking agent (20). Mannitol and glycine, are
`the most commonly used bulking agents,
`followed by glucose, sucrose, lactose, trehalose
`and dextran (21).
`
`The bulking agent may appear as crystalline
`and/or amorphous solid at
`the end of
`lyophilization process. Crystallization of the
`bulking agent, however, might adversely
`affect the physical stability of the product in
`certain instances, for which, an amorphous
`bulking agent would be preferred. Herman et al.
`studied
`the
`rate of hydrolysis of
`methylprednisolone sodium succinate in the
`presence of mannitol and lactose as the bulking
`agents, and observed that formulation with
`mannitol showed a faster degradation
`in
`comparison to
`that with
`lactose. It was
`hypothesized to be due to the crystallization of
`mannitol during lyophilization, unlike lactose,
`which remained in the amorphous state (22).
`The non-hygroscopic nature of crystalline
`mannitol, led to an increase in the amount of
`water available with the drug. In contrast, the
`hygroscopic amorphous lactose held water
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 46
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`Preformulation
`Stability - thermal, pH, photostability
`Solubility - pH solubility profile
`Compatibility - excipients and CCS
`Dose - single/multiple units
`
`Review Paper
`
`Is pH critical
`for stability?
`
`Yes
`
`Add buffering agent
`
`No
`
`Is the drug
`solubility
`low?
`
`Yes
`
`Add solubilizing agent
`
`No
`
`Is the product
`for multiple
`use?
`
`Yes
`
`Add antimicrobial agents
`
`No
`
`Lyophilize using prototype
`lyophilization cycle
`
`#only in vial lyophilization
`
`No
`
`Bulking agent
`required
`
`Change buffering
`agent
`
`No
`
`Is cake
`structure
`adequate?
`
`Yes
`
`Is the desired
`pH maintained
`during
`lyophilization
`and after
`reconstitution?
`
`
`Yes
`
`#
`
`Figure 6 Decision tree for selection of excipients for lyophilization of small molecules (continued next page)
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 47
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 7
`
`

`

`#
`
`Is drug
`crystalline?
`
`Yes
`
`Is
`process
`lengthy?
`
`Review Paper
`
`Add organic
`solvent to reduce
`processing time
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`No
`
`Is annealing
`sufficient to
`crystallize the
`drug?
`
`
`No
`
`Does addition
`of cosolvent
`crystallizes
`the drug?
`
`
`No
`
`Does combination
`of cosolvent and
`annealing
`crystallize drug?
`
`
`No
`
`Drug remains amorphous
`after lyophilization
`
`Yes
`
`Perform annealing to
`crystallize drug
`
`Yes
`
`Add cosolvents to
`crystallize drug
`
`Yes
`
`Use a combination of
`cosolvents and annealing
`to crystallize
`
`Is the
`process
`lengthy?
`
`Yes
`
`Add collapse
`temperature modifiers
`
`No
`
`Lyophilized product
`
`CCS – Container closure system
`
`
`
`Figure 6 Continued from previous page
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 48
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 8
`
`

`

`molecules, leading to a relative decrease in the
`amount of water available
`in the micro-
`environment of drug.
`
`The bulking agent may also crystallize in
`different polymorphic
`forms during
`lyophilization, which could also have serious
`implications on physical stability of drug
`product. Liao et al. reported that mannitol
`crystallizes as a mixture of ä-mannitol and
`mannitol hemihydrate during annealing. Release
`of water from hemihydrate form during
`shipping and storage conditions might cause
`degradation of moisture sensitive drug product
`(23).
`
`The nature of lyophilized cake also depends on
`the ratio of drug and bulking agent, showing an
`increased crystallization with an increase in
`amount of bulking agent. Korey and Schwartz
`studied the lyophilization of active constituents
`such as atropine sulfate, sodium cefoxitin,
`cefazolin
`sodium
`and procainamide
`hydrochloride. They showed that crystallization
`was induced by excipients such as glycine,
`alanine,
`serine, methionine, urea, and
`niacinamide, whereas lyophilization with some
`excipients such as mannitol and lactose gave an
`amorphous product. The degree of
`crystallization increased with an increase in the
`mole fraction of the excipient. For example,
`when the mole fraction of glycine in the
`solution was 0.41, the lyophilized cake of
`cefazolin sodium was amorphous. As the mole
`
`Figure 7 Good cake structure ensures proper pore
`formation which provides the channels for vapor removal
`(A) whereas in case of cake collapse, a poor structure is
`obtained, leading to increased resistance in removal of
`vapor (B).
`
`Review Paper
`
`to 0.80, complete
`increased
`fraction was
`crystallization of cefazolin
`sodium was
`observed. It was hypothesized that (i) the active
`constituent and excipient forms a molecular
`complex that crystallizes during the freezing
`process and/or (ii) the excipient crystallizes
`during the freezing process and serves as a seed
`crystal for the active constituent and/or (iii) the
`active constituent and excipient formed a
`eutectic during the freezing process (24).
`
`Buffering agent
`
`Control of pH is critical to avoid degradation of
`drug during processing,
`storage and
`reconstitution, thereby necessitating addition of
`buffering agent in the lyophilized formulation.
`The choice of buffer depends on the pH
`stability profile of active ingredient as drug
`needs to be reconstituted and stored for some
`time before it could be administered to the
`patient. For this purpose, the pH of maximum
`stability of drug should be known and
`maintained. Selection of a suitable buffer and
`its concentration is important for sensitive
`molecules. For example
`in aspartame
`lyophilizates, the presence of 0.1M phosphate
`buffer caused the half life of the material to
`decrease from 921 days in unbuffered material
`to 98 days; increasing the buffer concentration
`further causes a reduction to 77 days (25).
`
`The buffering agent should have a high collapse
`temperature, be non-volatile and have a high
`glass transition temperature (T ) (26). A high
`g
`collapse temperature would facilitate a faster
`primary drying, and its non-volatile nature
`would prevent pH drift,
`that might be
`detrimental
`to
`the product
`stability.
`Additionally, a high glass transition temperature
`(T ) would ensure stability during storage. In
`g
`this context, acetate buffer is not used due to its
`volatile nature, as it can be partially lost during
`lyophilization (27). Crystallization of buffer
`components can also lead to a drastic shift in
`pH, resulting in degradation of the active
`component. Sodium and potassium phosphate
`salts are not often used in the lyophilization,
`since these crystallize during cooling and in
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 49
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 9
`
`

`

`frozen solution, which leads to a decrease in
`pH of about 4 units (28). Shalave et al. studied
`citrate, succinate and tartrate buffer for their
`crystallization behavior and its effect on pH of
`the formulation. Citrate buffer was found to be
`the most preferred as it remained amorphous,
`with the shift
`in pH being minimal,
`in
`comparison to succinate and tartrate, which
`crystallized during lyophilization (29).
`
` “pH memory” is a term used to denote the
`relationship between pH-activity and pH-
`stability profiles, in the solution and dried state
`respectively, as the pH of the solution before
`drying has an impact on the rate of chemical
`reactivity in the resulting amorphous material
`(30-33). Guo et al. found that depending on the
`initial pH of an aqueous solution of quinapril
`hydrochloride,
`lyophilization produced a
`mixture of quinapril hydrochloride and the
`neutralized form. Increase in pH led to a
`proportionate
`increase
`in
`the amount of
`neutralized form. Since neutralized form is less
`stable than hydrochloride salt, the stability of
`the
`lyophilized sample decreased with an
`increase
`in the pH of solution used for
`lyophilization (34). In certain cases, however,
`pH stability of a drug in lyophilized form may
`show an unusual behaviour in comparison to
`the pH-stability in solution state. For example,
`moexipril is most stable at a pH of 4.5 in
`solution. However, when moexipril was
`lyophilized using a solution of pH range of 2-
`11, it was found to be most unstable at a pH of
`5.1. This was attributed
`to
`the altered
`mechanism of reactivity in absence of water in
`lyophilized product, compared to the aqueous
`solution (35). A similar effect was shown for
`the ionization of sulfonephthalein in trehalose-
`citrate systems, where protonation of indicators
`were higher in the lyophilized sample than in
`solution at a particular pH (36).
`
`Collapse temperature modifiers
`
`Lyophilization of amorphous material requires
`the primary drying temperature to be kept
`below
`the collapse
`temperature of
`the
`formulation. However, some excipients (37) in
`
`Review Paper
`
`amorphous state have a very low collapse
`temperature, thus increasing the duration of
`primary drying significantly. In such case,
`collapse temperature modifiers are utilized,
`which shift the overall collapse temperature
`higher (owing to their high individual collapse
`temperatures), with a consequent reduction in
`the primary drying
`cycle, without
`compromising
`the product quality
`(25).
`Commonly used collapse temperature modifiers

`are dextran, Ficoll
`, gelatin
`and
`hydroxyethylstarch
`(38). Their collapse
`temperatures (along with other critical process
`temperatures for different excipient classes) are
`summarized in Table 2. However, it must be
`noted that their use in lyophilized formulations
`is not very frequent.
`
`Table 2 Critcal process temperatures of various
`excipients used in lyophilization
`Excipient
`T ’
`T
`g
`
`References
`
`c
`
`BULKING AGENT
`Sucrose
`Lactose
`Trehalose
`Mannitol
`Sorbitol
`
`Glucose
`
`Raffinose
`Glycine
`Histidine
`PVP (K40)
`
`-32, -35
`-28
`-27, -29
`-35, -28
`-46
`
`-43
`
`-27
`-62
`-33
`-20
`
`BUFFERING AGENT
`Sodium citrate
`Sodium phosphate
`Sodium hydroxide
`Meglumine
`Tris base
`Tris HCl
`Tris acetate
`
`-41
`-45
`
`-51
`-65
`-54
`
`TONICITY M ODIFIER
`Sodium chloride
`Dextrose
`
`-44
`
`COLLAPSE
`TEM PERATURE
`M ODIFIER
`Dextran
`Ficoll
`Gelatin
`Hydroxyethyl starch
`
`-10
`-19
`-9
`
`-34,-32
`-31, -32
`-29.5, -34
`
`-45
`-40, -41.5
`-43
`-26
`
`-23
`
`(39-41)
`(39, 40, 42)
`(39, 41, 42)
`(39, 42)
`(40, 42, 43)
`
`(40, 41, 44)
`
`(43)
`(45)
`(39)
`(40, 42, 43)
`
`(39)
`(39)
`
`(39)
`(39)
`(39)
`
`(42)
`
`(38)
`
`-9, -10
`-19.5, -20
`-8
`-5
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 50
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 10
`
`

`

`Review Paper
`
`Miscellaneous Excipients
`
`Tonicity modifiers
`
`Solubilizing agent
`
`Surfactants
`
`Parenteral formulations should be isotonic with
`human plasma so as to avoid damage to the
`tissues. However, not all drugs at
`their
`recommended dosage are isotonic with blood,
`thus requiring the addition of a tonicity
`adjusting agent to the formulation. The most
`commonly used tonacity agent is dextrose,
`while others, such as glycerol and sodium
`chloride are less commonly used. The addition
`of tonicity modifiers to the
`lyophilization
`mixture, however, can complicate
`the
`formulation development, since they may lower
`the collapse
`temperature of
`the entire
`formulation owing to their very low col- lapse
`temperatures,
`thus
`increasing
`the primary
`drying
`time
`significantly. An alternative
`approach is to add the tonicity modifier to the
`reconstitution diluent rather than the freeze
`dried product. Deviations from isotonicity may
`be acceptable when the injection volumes are
`small and the infusion rate is slow (46).
`
`Antimicrobial agents
`
`Antimicrobial agents are added to multi-dose
`formulations
`to prevent microbial growth
`during its shelf life. Benzyl alcohol and a
`mixture of ethyl- and methyl- parabens are
`commonly used. Additionally, phenol and m-
`cresol are utilized in lyophilization. At very low
`(i.e., #0.05% w/w
`levels
`in
`solution),
`antimicrobial agents generally do not alter the
`collapse
`temperature of
`the
`formulation.
`Compatibility of antimicrobial agent with other
`ingredients in the formulation needs to be
`checked, when to the lyophilized cake (8).
`However, since the antimicrobial agent is not
`needed during
`the
`lyophilization process
`antimicrobial agents are often typically included
`in the diluent for reconstitution (27).
`
`Surfactants may be added at low levels (e.g.,
`~0.05% w/w aqueous
`solution)
`to aid
`reconstitution if the drug does not show good
`wetting behaviour. Surfactants are added to low
`dose products to minimize losses due to surface
`adsorption. Their addition in large quantity is
`not recommended due
`to
`the
`low glass
`transition temperature of commonly used non-
`ionic surfactants (e.g. Polysorbate 80) (47).
`Halikala et al. showed the effect of surfactant
`on the crystallization behavior of mannitol. It
`was observed
`that with
`increase
`in
`concentration of polysorbate 80,
`the
`crystallinity of mannitol
`increased and at
`concentration of 0.01% and above, increased
`amount of ä–mannitol was formed (48). They
`can be included in the diluting medium so as to
`keep the lyophilized formulation simple.
`
`Co-solvents
`
`Water is the most commonly used solvent for
`lyophilization. However, organic solvents are
`sometimes used to increase the primary drying
`rate by
`increasing
`the sublimation rates,
`improve product
`stability, decrease
`reconstitution
`time by
`improving drug
`wettability or solubility, and also enhance the
`sterility assurance of the sample solution (49).
`Since lyophilization works on the principle of
`vapor pressure differential, it is necessary for
`excipients to have low vapor pressure, to
`minimize their loss during the lyophilization
`process. However, co-solvents are added due to
`their high vapor pressure to facilitate faster
`removal from
`the product during drying
`process and thus speeding up the lyophilization
`process. It has been reported that tert-butyl
`alcohol has been used to speed up the
`lyophilization process
`(50). The
`rate of
`degradation of active constituent
`in
`the
`presence of water can be reduced by addition
`of non-aqueous solvents (51, 52). In some
`cases, solvent may play no role in stabilization
`
`This Journal is © IPEC-Americas Inc
`
`J. Excipients and Food Chem. 1 (1) 2010 - 51
`
`Mylan Ex 1010, Page 11
`
`

`

`of the active constituent but improve the
`aesthetic property of the final product (50).
`
`The use of co-solvents, however, requires
`proper handling and storage, consideration of
`the level of residual solvent and its potential
`toxicity. The most commonly used solvent is a
`tertbutanol/water combination. Tertbutanol
`modifies the crystal habit of ice and promotes
`its sublimation, thus reducing the duration of
`primary drying (53, 54). Telang et al. studied the
`effect of solvents on the crystallization of
`cefalothin sodium. The lyophilized cake formed
`with ethanol and isopropanol were found to
`collapse, while tert-butyl alcohol gave a good
`cake
`structure.
`Increased degree of
`supersaturation and nucleation during freezing,
`followed by annealing due to co-solvent, led to
`a faster crystallization rate
`(55). Ethanol,
`although being the most generally used solvent
`in the laboratory, is less preferred as a co-
`solvent, as a shelf temperature of about -120°C
`is required to attain frozen state, thus requiring
`a tremendous rise in energy consumption. In
`contrast, tert-butyl alcohol does not require
`additional cooling (50).
`
`Complexing agent
`
`Complexation is sometimes used to improve
`the solubility of drug in the solvent especially
`water. Kagkadis et al. used hydroxypropyl-â-
`cyclodextrin (HP-â-CD) complex of ibuprofen
`to increase the solubility of lyophilized product
`(56). The addition of complexing agent may,
`however, lead to a reduction in the critical.
`temperature of
`the
`formulation,
`thus
`complicating the formulation development.
`
`LEGAL STATUS OF EXCIPIENTS
`
`Excipients added to the lyophilized cake should
`have regulatory acceptance, as they are intended
`for parenteral administration. The
`list of
`approved excipients with their maximum limit
`for
`lyophilization of small molecules, as
`reported
`in the IIG (Inactive Ingredients
`Guide) is listed in Table 3 (37).
`
`Review Paper
`
`Table 3 List of excipients used in ‘Powder, for
`injection solution, lyophilized’ with the maximum
`allowable limits as per IIG (37)
`
`Inactive ingredient
`
`Mannitol
`
`Mannitol
`a
`Mannitol
`Mannitol
`a
`Mannitol
`Anhydrous lactose
`Anhydrous lactose
`Lactose
`Lactose
`Lactose
`Lactose m onohydrate
`Lactose m onohydrate
`Lactose m onohydrate
`Lactose m onohydrate
`Lactose, hydrous
`Sucrose
`Sucroseb
`Sucrose
`Sucrose
`Sucrose
`Sucrosea
`Glycine
`Glycine
`Glycine
`Dextran 40
`Anhydrous citric acid
`Citric acid
`Citric acid m onohydrate
`Sodium citrate
`Sodium citrate
`Sodium citrate
`Sodium citrate
`Trisodium citrate dihydrate
`Sodium phosphate
`dihydrate
`Sodium phosphate,
`dibasic
`Sodium phosphate,
`dibasic anhydrous
`Sodium phosphate,
`dibasic anhydrous
`Sodium phosphate,
`dibasic anhydrous
`Sodium phosphate,
`dibasic, dihydrate
`Sodium phosphate,
`dibasic, heptahydrate
`Sodium phosphate,
`dibasic, h

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket