throbber
Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 11, No. 10, 1994 (cid:9)
`
`Report
`
`The Effect of Bulking Agent on the
`Solid-State Stability of Freeze-Dried
`Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate
`
`Beth D. Herman,1 Brent D. Sinclair,2
`Nathaniel Milton,2 and Steven L. Nail23
`
`Received February 11, 1994; accepted May 11, 1994
`
`The rate of hydrolysis of methylprednisolone sodium succinate in
`the freeze dried solid state at 40°C was determined in the presence
`of two common bulking agents - mannitol and lactose - at two dif-
`ferent ratios of drug to excipient. Residual moisture levels were less
`than 1% in all samples tested, with no significant difference in re-
`sidual moisture among different formulations. Rate of hydrolysis
`was significantly higher in mannitol-containing formulations versus
`lactose-containing formulations, and the rate of hydrolysis increases
`with increasing ratio of mannitol to drug. Thermal analysis and x-ray
`diffraction data are consistent with a composition-dependent rate of
`crystallization of mannitol in the formulation and its subsequent
`effect on distribution of water in the freeze-dried matrix. Increased
`water in the microenvironment of the drug decreases the glass tran-
`sition temperature of the amorphous phase, resulting in an increased
`rate of reaction. The physical state of lactose remained constant
`throughout the duration of the study, and the rate of hydrolysis was
`not significantly different from the control formulation containing no
`excipient. Thermal analysis and x-ray diffraction data are consistent
`with formation of a liquid crystal phase in freeze-concentrated so-
`lutions of methylprednisolone sodium succinate containing no ex-
`cipient.
`
`KEY WORDS: thermal analysis; x-ray diffraction; excipients; crys-
`tallization; lyophilization.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Bulking agents are commonly used in formulation of
`freeze dried products in order to provide an inert, easily
`reconstituted matrix containing a low dose of active drug
`substance. The study reported here was prompted by the
`need to prepare material for a blinded clinical trial where
`three different doses of drug are presented such that the
`freeze dried cakes all look alike by using an appropriate
`amount of a suitable bulking agent.
`Methylprednisolone sodium succinate is a soluble pro-
`drug of methylprednisolone used as an injectable corticoste-
`roid, where solubilization is achieved through the use of the
`ionizable hemisuccinate moiety. The prodrug is unstable in
`aqueous solution, the principal products being hydrolysis to
`methylprednisolone and acyl migration to form the isomeric
`17-ester (1). Therefore, methylprednisolone sodium succi-
`nate is marketed as a freeze dried powder (Solu-Medrole).
`
`Drug Delivery Research and Development, The Upjohn Company,
`7000 Portage Road, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001.
`2 Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, School of Phar-
`macy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907.
`3 To whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of
`two of the most commonly used bulking agents in freeze
`dried injectable formulations- mannitol and lactose - on the
`stability of methylprednisolone sodium succinate as a freeze
`dried solid, with particular attention to the effect of excipient
`on the physical form of the freeze dried solid and the location
`of water within the solid matrix.
`
`C — CH2 — 0 — C — (CH2)2 — C — Oe Na0
`
`11
`
`OH
`
`CH
`
`HO
`CH
`
`00
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`Methylprednisolone hemisuccinate USP was provided
`by The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI. Mannitol and
`lactose were USP grade and were either provided by The
`Upjohn Company or purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.
`Phosphate buffer salts (Fisher Scientific) were analytical
`grade. Inorganic salts for water vapor adsorption experi-
`ments were reagent grade materials.
`
`Methods
`
`Drug with no excipient present (250 mg per vial) was
`used as a control for stability studies. Two strengths of drug
`were examined with each bulking agent - 40 mg and 125 mg
`- where the total amount of bulking agent plus drug was the
`same as the control. The formulation was prepared by sus-
`pending methylprednisolone 21-hemisuccinate in 0.08 M
`phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing the appropriate quan-
`tity of either mannitol or lactose. Conversion to the sodium
`salt was carried out by slow addition of 10% sodium hydrox-
`ide until essentially all solids were dissolved. The final pH
`was 7.5 - 7.7. Solutions were sterile filtered and 3.74 ml was
`filled into 20 ml tubing glass vials. Freeze drying was carried
`out by placing vials directly on the freeze dryer shelf, freez-
`ing at -50°C for 4-6 hrs, followed by primary drying at a shelf
`temperature of 10°C and a chamber pressure of 100 microns
`Hg for 24 hrs. Secondary drying was carried out for approx-
`imately 24 hrs at a shelf temperature of 30°C and a chamber
`pressure of 100 microns Hg. Vials were stoppered under full
`vacuum. Residual moisture was measured by Karl Fisher
`titration (Model 701, Metrohm, Inc., Herisau, Switzerland)
`where the freeze dried material was quickly transferred to
`the titration vessel containing anhydrous methanol. Coulo-
`metric end point detection was used.
`Stability of the freeze dried solid was measured at 25°C
`and 40°C using a reverse phase HPLC assay (1). A 4 p.m
`Nova-Pak® C-18 column (Waters, Inc., Milford, MA) was
`used. The mobile phase consisted of 33% acetonitrile in wa-
`ter buffered at pH 5.2 - 5.4 with 0.05M acetate buffer. A fixed
`wavelength UV detector at 254 nm and digital data station
`were used to quantitate the parent compound and degrada-
`
`1467 (cid:9)
`
`0724-8741/94/1000-1467$07.00/0 © 1994 Plenum Publishing Corporation
`
`Mylan Ex 1054, Page 1
`
`

`
`1468 (cid:9)
`
`Herman, Sinclair, Milton, and Nail
`
`10
`
`9
`
`a
`
`7
`
`6
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`Free Methylprednieolone (%)
`
`0
`0 (cid:9)
`
`1 (cid:9)
`
`2 (cid:9)
`
`5
`
`6 (cid:9)
`
`7
`
`4
`3 (cid:9)
`Time (Months)
`Figure 1 - Hydrolysis of methylprednisolone sodium succinate at
`40°C for 250 mg control (solid circles), 125 mg drug in mannitol
`(open triangles), 40 mg drug in mannitol (closed triangles), and 40 mg
`drug in lactose (open circles).
`
`difference in residual moisture between the samples contain-
`ing mannitol and those containing lactose. There was a small
`but significant increase in residual moisture of all formula-
`tions during six months storage at 40°C, probably caused by
`water vapor transfer from the rubber stopper to the freeze
`dried cake. The average increase was 0.29% with a range of
`0.05 - 0.45% and there was no significant difference between
`the formulations studied with respect to increase in residual
`moisture level.
`
`Thermal Analysis
`
`DSC thermograms of the formulations prior to freeze
`drying are shown in Figures 2-4. Note that endotherms are
`represented by upward deflections on all thermograms.
`Thermograms of methylprednisolone sodium succinate in
`phosphate buffer with no bulking agent present (Figure 2) are
`shown for three different heating rates after cooling at a rate
`of 20°C/min. Three separate thermal events occur prior to
`the melting endotherm of ice, and the thermograms recorded
`at different heating rates illustrate the effect of heating rate
`on both sensitivity and resolution. The endotherm on the
`leading edge of the ice melting endotherm is resolved at the
`slowest heating rate, but is not resolved at the highest heat-
`ing rate. Two exotherms are observed prior to the en-
`dotherms, with best sensitivity in detecting the exotherms
`observed at higher heating rates.
`The thermogram in Figure 2 is not consistent with low-
`temperature thermal behavior of solutions in which the sol-
`ute a) crystallizes readily upon freezing, b) remains amor-
`phous upon freezing, or c) initially forms a metastable amor-
`
`tion products. USP reference standards of methylpredniso-
`lone hemisuccinate and methylprednisolone were used as
`external standards. Percent methylprednisolone, the ester
`hyrolysis product, was used as the primary measure of
`chemical stability in the solid state.
`Both the freeze dried solids and solutions prior to freeze
`drying were examined by thermal analysis using a Perkin-
`Elmer Series 7 DSC with a mechanical cooling accessory
`and computer data station (2). Helium (40 ml/min) was used
`as the purge gas. Solution samples were prepared by placing
`approximately 20 µ1 of solution in an aluminum sample pan
`and sealing the sample by crimping an aluminum cover in
`place. Samples were frozen at a controlled rate to about
`-50°C, and the thermograms were recorded during warming
`at a controlled rate to just above 0°C. A nitrogen-purged
`glove box was placed over the sample compartment to pre-
`vent artifacts due to moisture condensation. Solid samples
`were prepared by packing about 10 mg of freeze dried pow-
`der into aluminum sample pans. For measuring the effect of
`water vapor sorption on glass transition temperatures in the
`solid state, DSC pans containing the solid sample were
`placed in dessicators at different relative humidities and
`equilibrated for about 48 hours, at which time the samples
`were quickly removed from the dessicator and sealed. Ther-
`mograms were recorded in the range of 20-120°C.
`Water vapor sorption isotherms were measured on
`freeze dried powders by placing vials (with lyostoppers in
`the partially inserted position) in dessicators containing var-
`ious saturated salt solutions. The following salts were used -
`sodium hydroxide, lithium chloride, potassium acetate, po-
`tassium carbonate, and sodium bromide. Samples were re-
`moved at two hour intervals during the first 12 hours, fol-
`lowed by sampling twice a day for five days. Vials were
`sealed upon removal from the dessicator, and moisture con-
`tent was determined by Karl Fisher titration. The water con-
`tent of the samples was found to reach approximate equilib-
`rium after about 48 hours at room temperature.
`The physical form of the freeze dried powders was stud-
`ied by x-ray powder diffraction. A Siemens Krystalloflex®
`diffractometer was used, with CuK, radiation at a voltage of
`40 kV and a current of 20 mA. Powder specimens were pre-
`pared by gently breaking up the freeze dried cakes and plac-
`ing in an aluminum powder mount. Samples were scanned
`from 2° to 40° at 0.1° per second.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Effect of Bulking Agent on Stability
`
`The stability at 40°C of the control formulation is shown
`in Figure 1 along with that of formulations containing 40 and
`125 mg of drug in mannitol and 40 mg of drug in lactose.
`Each data point represents the average of duplicate measure-
`ments from different vials. Rate of hydrolysis of the drug
`with mannitol as the bulking agent is markedly faster than
`when lactose is used, and the rate of hydrolysis increases as
`the ratio of mannitol to drug increases. The rate of hydroly-
`sis of the 40 mg strength in lactose is not significantly differ-
`ent from that of the control.
`Residual moisture content of all formulations were in
`the range of 0.3 to 0.9% percent, and there was no significant
`
`Mylan Ex 1054, Page 2
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`
`The Solid-State Stability of Freeze-Dried Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate (cid:9)
`
`1469
`
`-60 (cid:9)
`
`-40 (cid:9)
`
`-20 (cid:9)
`-SO (cid:9)
`-10
`Temperature (C)
`
`0
`
`10
`
`Figure 2 - DSC thermograms of methylprednisolone sodium succinate in 0.08 M
`phosphate buffer. Cooling rate was 20°C/min and heating rates were at 10°C (A),
`5°C (B), and 2°C (C) per minute.
`
`phous phase which then crystallizes with subsequent
`warming (3,4). No glass transition is observed in Figure 2, as
`would be expected for an amorphous solute. The freeze
`dried drug does undergo a glass transition, however (see
`Figure 5). The endotherm on the leading edge of the ice
`melting endotherm suggests eutectic melting; however, the
`x-ray diffractogram of the freeze dried drug alone (see Figure
`7) is not consistent with well-defined crystallinity.
`Thermograms of the lactose formulations (Figure 3)
`show a glass transition (Tg') with a midpoint of about -27°C.
`This is consistent with the behavior of a solution where the
`solute does not crystallize when the system is frozen. The
`relative concentrations of lactose and drug have no signifi-
`
`cant effect on Tg' for the formulations studied here. This
`result is in reasonable agreement with a previously reported
`value of about -29°C for Tg' of lactose (2).
`Thermograms of the mannitol formulations (Figure 4)
`indicate that the physical state of the material depends on the
`ratio of drug to mannitol. For the formulation containing 40
`mg of drug, a crystallization exotherm is observed in the
`temperature range expected for mannitol. The formulation
`containing 125 mg of drug in mannitol does not crystallize
`under the conditions used for thermal analysis. Instead, a
`glass transition is observed, with a mid-point temperature of
`about -36°C. This is lower than the glass transition temper-
`ature of mannitol alone (about -28°C). This may be explained
`
`Heat Flow (m11)
`
`-60 (cid:9)
`
`-00 (cid:9)
`
`-40 (cid:9)
`
`-30 (cid:9)
`-20
`Temperature (C)
`Figure 3 DSC thermograms of formulations containing 40 mg (A) and 125 mg (B)
`of drug in lactose. Inset shows glass transition region.
`
`-10
`
`0
`
`10
`
`Mylan Ex 1054, Page 3
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`
`1470
`
`Herman, Sinclair, Milton, and Nail
`
`B
`
`Heat Flow (mW)
`
`z
`
`B
`
`A
`
`—50 (cid:9)
`
`—50 (cid:9)
`
`—40 (cid:9)
`
`—20 (cid:9)
`—90 (cid:9)
`Temperature (C)
`Figure 4 - DSC thermograms of formulations containing 40 mg (A) and 125 mg (B)
`of drug in mannitol.
`
`—10 (cid:9)
`
`0 (cid:9)
`
`10
`
`by a plasticizing effect of the drug itself or, more likely,
`increased unfrozen water in the freeze concentrate caused
`by the drug, the buffer, or both.
`Thermal analysis of freeze dried drug (no excipient
`present) shows a glass transition which is well above 100°C
`at low residual moisture levels. As shown in Figure 5, the
`glass transition temperature decreases continuously as the
`residual moisture level increases. This is consistent with the
`behavior of amorphous solids where water acts as a plasti-
`cizer, as previously reported by Zografi and coworkers (5,6).
`
`X-Ray Powder Diffraction
`X-ray powder diffractograms of a mannitol-containing
`formulation (125 mg drug) are shown in Figure 6 initially and
`at 2 and 6 months. The data show that the freeze dried solid
`is substantially amorphous initially, and that crystallinity de-
`velops during storage despite residual water levels on the
`order of 1.0 to 1.5 percent. The formulations containing lac-
`tose as the excipient were amorphous initially, and remained
`so for the duration of this study (data not shown). The for-
`mulation containing 40 mg of drug in mannitol showed sub-
`
`120
`
`100
`
`00
`
`0
`
`40
`2
`
`4
`
`a
`
`10
`
`12
`
`11 Water
`Figure 5 - Glass transition of freeze dried methylprednisolone so-
`dium succinate as a function of water content.
`
`stantial crystallinity initially after freeze drying, and the de-
`gree of crystallinity increased somewhat during the six
`month storage interval (data not shown). Samples of freeze
`dried mannitol alone were prepared for use as a standard to
`estimate the degree of crystallinity in stability samples; how-
`ever, both mannitol alone and mannitol in the formulation
`appear to be mixtures of polymorphs (7), and the composi-
`tion of the mixtures is not the same for the two materials.
`Further work is under way to better characterize the crystal
`forms of mannitol which are formed during freezing and dry-
`ing under a variety of conditions.
`The x-ray diffraction pattern of drug with no bulking
`agent present is shown in Figure 7. A single, sharp peak was
`observed in all vials tested at about 4° 20, and a broad, dif-
`fuse peak is centered at around 18° 20. This type of diffrac-
`togram is consistent with diffractograms reported for liquid
`crystals (8), where the reflection at the low angle arises from
`the spacing between layers, and the larger angle reflection
`arises from order within the individual layers. Additional
`polarized light microscopy experiments have confirmed the
`formation of liquid crystals by methylprednisolone sodium
`succinate. A lyotropic mesomorphic phase might also ex-
`plain the endotherm observed in Figure 2 prior to the main
`ice melting endotherm. Casillas and coworkers (9) observed
`two endotherms prior to the main ice melting endotherm in
`the thermogram of aqueous solutions of dioctyl sodium sul-
`fosuccinate (Aerosol OT). These additional endotherms
`were attributed to water in two different states of association
`with the solute in the mesophase.
`Given that the surface activity of the drug is well doc-
`umented (10), formation of a liquid crystalline phase from
`concentration of a micellar system would not be unexpected.
`However, further work is needed in order to better under-
`stand the pharmaceutical significance of the liquid crystal-
`line state within freeze dried solids. While the solid state
`stability of methylprednisolone sodium succinate in the ab-
`sence of any excipient is not a problem at sufficiently low
`water content, the general significance of liquid crystal
`phase formation with respect to stability could be related to
`
`Mylan Ex 1054, Page 4
`
`

`
`The Solid-State Stability of Freeze-Dried Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate (cid:9)
`
`1471
`
`5 (cid:9)
`
`10 (cid:9)
`
`15 (cid:9)
`
`20 (cid:9)
`25
`Angle (2 Theta)
`Figure 6 - X-ray powder diffractograms of formulations containing 125 mg of drug in
`mannitol initially after freeze drying (A), and after 2 months (B) and 6 months (C)
`storage at 40°C.
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`preferred orientation between molecules in the liquid crystal
`phase, with subsequent effects on reaction rates through in-
`termolecular catalysis. As a side note, it was observed dur-
`ing x-ray diffraction analysis of stability samples that some
`vials of drug containing no excipient show evidence of crys-
`tallization during storage. Further work is needed to better
`understand the phase transitions involved; in particular,
`whether a crystalline solid is formed from the dehydrated
`liquid crystal phase, or whether the liquid crystalline phase
`must first convert to an amorphous phase prior to crystalli-
`zation of the solid.
`
`Water Vapor Sorption Isotherms
`
`Water vapor adsorption isotherms were measured for
`freeze dried, single component systems consisting of man-
`nitol, lactose, and methylprednisolone sodium succinate in
`order to compare water uptake characteristics of the indi-
`vidual formulation components. Moisture content versus
`time at relative humidities of 11, 21, 32, and 43 percent was
`determined. The approximate time for a reasonably constant
`moisture level to be established was 48 hours at all relative
`humidities examined. The plateau value of moisture was
`
`>.
`4-,
`in
`C
`a)
`-I ,
`C
`
`5 (cid:9)
`
`10
`
`20 (cid:9)
`25
`15 (cid:9)
`Angle (Two Theta)
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`Figure 7 - X-ray diffraction of freeze-dried methylprednisolone sodium succinate with no
`excipient present.
`
`Mylan Ex 1054, Page 5
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`
`1472 (cid:9)
`
`Herman, Sinclair, Milton, and Nail
`
`10
`
`a
`
`4
`
`2
`
`•
`
`0
`
`0
`10 (cid:9)
`
`15 (cid:9)
`
`20 (cid:9)
`
`90
`25 (cid:9)
`Relative Humidity
`Figure 8 - Water vapor adsorption isotherms of freeze dried mannitol (open tri-
`angles), lactose (open circles), and drug (closed circles).
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`plotted against relative humidity to construct the water va-
`por sorption isotherms shown in Figure 8. Lactose (amor-
`phous) and methylprednisolone sodium succinate (dried liq-
`uid crystal) are similar in water vapor sorption characteris-
`tics. Mannitol, however, adsorbs very little moisture for the
`relative humidity range examined. This is consistent with
`crystalline material, where the only surface available for wa-
`ter vapor sorption is the surface of crystals.
`
`Suggested Role of Excipient in Solid State Stability
`
`The data reported here are consistent with the work of
`Zografi and coworkers which support the idea that the effect
`of water on critical attributes of amorphous drugs is deter-
`mined not so much by how much water is present, but by
`where the water is located. The effect on critical product
`attributes of concentration of water within amorphous re-
`gions becomes more important as the fraction of amorphous
`material decreases (11). In formulations containing mannitol
`as the excipient, the mannitol crystallizes either during the
`freeze dry process or with time during storage, depending on
`the ratio of mannitol to drug. In either case, there is not a
`significant amount of water associated with crystalline man-
`nitol, as shown by the comparative water vapor sorption
`isotherms. For the formulation containing 40 mg of drug in
`mannitol, the effective water content of the amorphous
`phase would be expected to be more than five times the
`value measured by Karl Fisher titration, assuming that the
`mannitol is essentially all crystalline, since the mannitol to
`drug ratio is approximately 5.2:1. Referring to Figure 5, the
`increased water level would be expected to decrease T5' by
`20° to 30°C. Amplification of the water content of the amor-
`phous phase could occur by any or all of three mechanisms:
`1) While the initial levels of residual moisture are not signif-
`icantly different for lactose and mannitol formulations, the
`amount of water "seen" by the drug cannot be the same
`given the dramatically different water vapor adsorption iso-
`therms for the two materials. 2) Crystallization of mannitol
`with time would result in a redistribution of water in the
`
`freeze dried matrix and an increase in the amount of water in
`the drug microenvironment. 3) Water added to the freeze
`dried solid by transfer from the stopper would locate in the
`amorphous phase. Subsequent lowering of the glass transi-
`tion temperature of the amorphous phase would be expected
`to accelerate the rates of chemical reactions leading to in-
`stability of the drug substance.
`In contrast to the mannitol formulations, those contain-
`ing lactose are markedly more stable because lactose re-
`mains amorphous, resulting in a more uniform distribution of
`water in the freeze dried matrix. This is supported by the
`water vapor adsorption isotherm data, showing similar affin-
`ity of both drug and lactose for water. The similar water
`vapor adsorption isotherms support the idea that lactose
`could act, in part, as an internal dessicant by competing for
`the available water.
`
`Practical Implications
`
`Mannitol is often the first choice as a bulking agent
`among formulation development scientists, since it is inex-
`pensive, non-toxic, and can be freeze dried at relatively high
`temperatures with full retention of the desireable properties
`of a freeze dried product. Lactose, on the other hand, re-
`quires more conservative drying conditions because it re-
`mains amorphous on freezing and has a relatively low T5'
`temperature of about -30°C. However, it is important to be
`aware of potential adverse effects on stability because of the
`effect of mannitol crystallization on distribution of water in
`the freeze dried cake. Stability protocols for mannitol-based
`formulations should reflect the potential for adverse effects
`of mannitol on stability of drugs which are amorphous as
`freeze-dried solids and, in particular, for protein formula-
`tions containing mannitol (12). Particular attention should be
`given to monitoring moisture content of stability samples in
`mannitol-based formulations, since water vapor transfer
`from the stopper to the product can be very significant, par-
`ticularly when the moisture is concentrated in amorphous
`regions of the lyophilized cake.
`
`Mylan Ex 1054, Page 6
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`
`The Solid-State Stability of Freeze-Dried Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate (cid:9)
`
`1473
`
`Looking at only the DSC thermogram of the drug solu-
`tion at low temperature, a development scientist would be
`led to believe that the drug crystallizes during freezing or
`after the frozen solution is heated during initiation of drying.
`This drug is certainly not crystalline in the traditional sense
`after freeze drying. This points to the importance of charac-
`terizing the dried solid by x-ray diffraction initially after
`freeze drying and monitoring the physical state of the solid
`during stability studies.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`The authors gratefully acknowledge the support pro-
`vided by the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association
`Foundation for an Undergraduate Research Fellowship (B.
`Sinclair), Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme for an Academic Devel-
`opment Grant (S.L. Nail), Edwards High Vacuum, Ton-
`awanda, NY (freeze drying equipment grant), and NIH Bi-
`ological Research Support Grant #RR-05586-24.
`The technical assistance provided by May Mui and Lisa
`Nail is also greatly appreciated.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. B.D. Anderson and V. Taphouse. Initial rate studies of hydro-
`lysis and acyl migration in methylprednisolone 21-hemi-
`succinate and 17-hemisuccinate. J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 181-6
`(1981).
`2. L.M. Her and S.L. Nail. Measurement of glass transitions in
`
`frozen solutions by differential scanning calorimetry. Pharm.
`Res., 11: 54-59 (1994).
`3. S.L. Nail and L.A. Gatlin. Principles and practice of freeze
`drying. In K.E. Avis, H.A. Lieberman, an L. Lachman, Phar-
`maceutical Dosage Forms: Parenteral Medications, Vol. 2,
`Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1993, pp. 173-9.
`4. L.A. Gatlin and P.P. DeLuca. A study of phase transitions in
`frozen antibiotic solutions by differential scanning calorimetry.
`J Parenteral Drug Assoc., 34: 398-408 (1980).
`5. G. Zografi. States of water associated with solids. Drug Dev.
`Ind. Pharm., 14: 1905-26 (1988).
`6. C. A. Oksanen and G. Zografi. The relationship between glass
`transition temperature and water vapor adsorption of poly(vi-
`nylpyrrolidone). Pharm. Res., 7: 654-7 (1990).
`7. Organic and Organometallic Phases, Powder Diffraction File,
`International Center for Diffraction Data, Swarthmore, PA 1992,
`p. 643.
`8. G.H. Browne, J.W. Doane, and V.D. Neff, A Review of the
`Structure and Properties of Liquid Crystals. CRC Press, Cleve-
`land, 1971, page 18.
`9. N. Casillas, J.E. Puig, R. Olayo, T.J. Hart, and E.I. Franses.
`State of water and surfactant in lyotrophic liquid crystals. Lang-
`muir, 5: 384-9 (1989).
`10. B.D. Anderson, R.A. Conradi, and K. Johnson. Influence of
`premicellar and micellar association on the reactivity of meth-
`ylprednisolone 21- hemiesters in aqueous solution. J. Pharm.
`Sci., 72: 325-31 (1983).
`11. C. Ahlneck and G. Zografi. The molecular basis of moisture
`effects on the physical and chemical stability of drugs in the
`solid state. Int. J. Pharm. 62: 87-95 (1990).
`12. K. Izutsu, S. Yoshoika, and T. Terao. Effect of mannitol crys-
`tallinity on the stabilization of enzymes during freeze drying.
`Chem. Pharm. Bull. 42: 5-8 (1994).
`
`Mylan Ex 1054, Page 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket