throbber
Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica ñ Drug Research, Vol. 62 No. 1 pp. 25ñ29, 2005
`
`ISSN 0001-6837
`Polish Pharmaceutical Society
`
`DRUG TECHNOLOGY
`
`THE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LYOPHILIZED TABLETS
`CONTAINING A MODEL DRUG IN DIFFERENT CHEMICAL FORMS
`AND CONCENTRATIONS
`
`MA£GORZATA SZNITOWSKA*, MARCIN P£ACZEK and MA£GORZATA KLUNDER
`
`Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Medical University of GdaÒsk,
`107 Hallera Str., 80-416 GdaÒsk, Poland
`
`Abstract: Orodispersible tablets, usually prepared using freezeñdrying method, are becoming a popular drug
`formulation for patients who have difficulties swallowing solid dosage forms. The influence of drug solubility
`and concentration on the physical characteristics of lyophilized tablets composed of mannitol and gelatin was
`investigated. Phenobarbital and phenobarbital sodium were studied as model drugs. The tablets were analyzed
`for mechanical strength using a new method employing Instron, a material testing apparatus. For tablets con-
`taining phenobarbital in the form of sodium salt, better mechanical strength was demonstrated than for tablets
`prepared with water insoluble phenobarbital ñ acid form. Besides, the mechanical characteristics of the tablets
`indicate that plasticity and porosity were reduced when sodium phenobarbital was incorporated at a higher dose.
`Lyophilized tablets were not hygroscopic and only a small increase of tablet mass by 1% and 3% was observed
`after 4 weeks of storage at 40% and 60% RH, respectively. All formulations disintegrated in seconds in water,
`at a temperature of 37OC.
`
`Keywords: lyophilization; freeze-dried tablets; mannitol; gelatin; phenobarbital
`
`Oral route of drug administration is convenient
`and preferred by patients and this is why tablets and
`capsules are the most popular pharmaceutical
`dosage forms. However, sometimes patients, espe-
`cially children and elderly people, may have diffi-
`culty swallowing solid dosage forms. It is estimated
`that 50% of population is affected by this problem,
`which results in a high incidence of non-compliance
`and ineffective therapy (1). The problem can be
`solved by producing orodispersible forms (Ph. Eur.),
`which placed in the mouth, allow to rapidly disperse
`or dissolve in the saliva and then can be swallowed
`as a liquid, in the normal way. Such systems in the
`literature are called: FMTs (fast-melting tablets),
`ODT (orally disintegrating tablets) or FDDF (fast
`dissolving/disintegrating dosage forms).
`There are three major methods for manufactur-
`ing this kind of tablets: 1) freeze-drying, 2) mould-
`ing by compression or heat-moulding, 3) direct
`compression. Because of the high porosity, freeze-
`dried tablets disintegrate in oral cavity faster than
`other systems. Unfortunately, lyophilization, as a
`method of tablet preparation, has also disadvan-
`tages: lack of physical resistance, hygroscopicity of
`the product, as well as high cost of production and
`low dose of the drug which can be incorporated (2).
`
`* Corresponding author: msznito@amg.gda.pl
`
`Typical freeze-dried tablet consists of a drug
`enclosed in a water soluble matrix made of a
`hydrophilic structure-forming polymer (usually gel-
`atin) and a filler (saccharide ñ usually mannitol).
`Other ingredients of the tablets may be sweetening
`agents (aspartam), taste-masking additives and
`preservatives (3). At present, many researchers are
`studying the possibilities to utilize other matrix
`forming agents in the FDDF formulations. These
`are: maltodextrins, different kinds of gelatins, xan-
`tan gum and cellulose-derivatives (4). The type and
`amount of the excipients have a significant influence
`on the characteristics of the lyophilized tablets,
`however, the incorporated drug can also modify
`properties of tablets to a great extend.
`The aim of the study was to determine the influ-
`ence of concentration and chemical form of the drug on
`physical properties of the lyophilized tablets containing
`mannitol and gelatin. Phenobarbital and its sodium salt
`were used as model drugs. Besides, the applicability of
`a material testing machine Instron to determine the
`mechanical strength of the tablets was evaluated.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`Preparation of tablets
`Tablets were made by freeze-drying. Gelatin
`(I.G.G. Eberbach, Germany) and mannitol (POCh
`
`25
`
`Mylan Ex 1038, Page 1
`
`

`

`26
`
`MA£GORZATA SZNITOWSKA et al.
`
`Gliwice, Poland) were dissolved in purified water at
`60oC. Phenobarbital, F (donated by Galenus,
`Warsaw, Poland) and
`its sodium salt, FNa
`(Tarchomin Pharmaceutical Works, Warsaw,
`Poland) were introduced at various concentrations to
`the tablet solution with constant mixing. The com-
`positions of different formulations, both with and
`without drug, are shown in Table 1. FNa dissolved
`completely at all concentrations, but with F suspen-
`sion was formed, when the concentration exceeded
`0.1% (w/w). The pH of FNa solution was in the
`range 7.6-9.2 and pH of the F dispersions was 5.1.
`Freeze-dried tablets were prepared as follows: the
`wells of PVC blisters (20 mm in diameters) were
`filled with 2.0 ml of solution or suspension and the
`blisters were placed immediately on the pre-frozen
`shelves of the freeze-dryer (Alpha 2-4, Christ,
`Osterode, Germany). The samples were frozen at
`ñ 45oC and kept at this temperature for 60 minutes.
`Primary drying was performed for 40 h at a pressure
`of 0.08 mbar with gradual increasing the shelf tem-
`perature to 20oC. In the second drying step the shelf
`temperature was increased to 35oC for 2 hours.
`
`Visual inspection of tablets
`Morphological characterization of the freeze-
`dried tablets comprised of: shape, color, surface and
`friability analysis. Adhesion of tablets to the blister
`
`and the easiness of taking them out were also evalu-
`ated.
`
`Mechanical strength testing
`A compression testing machine Instron (Model
`5543, Instron Corporation, Canton, USA) was used
`to determine the tablets strength. Each tablet was
`placed horizontally on the lower support and com-
`pressed using a constant speed of 0.22 mm/min to
`the maximum force of 80 N. Relationship between
`the load (N) and deformation of the tablets (%) was
`studied. Tablets containing different amounts of F or
`FNa as well as tablets lyophilized in different loca-
`tions on the freeze-dryer shelf were compared. From
`each formulation 10 tablets were analyzed to evalu-
`ate reproducibility of the results.
`
`Stability of tablets at different relative humidity
`Tablets with F or FNa (n = 6) were placed in a
`hygrostat and stored at relative humidities (RH)
`45%, 60% and 90% over sulphuric acid solutions
`(48%, 38% and 17%, respectively) for 4 weeks.
`Changes in tablet mass and appearance were
`observed.
`
`Disintegration test
`For determination of disintegration time of
`tablets two different methods were employed. In the
`
`Table 1. The visual characteristics of freeze-dried tablets: placebo and containing phenobarbital (F) or phenobarbital sodium
`(FNa) as model drugs
`
`Composition of solution or suspension
`subjected to freeze-drying [%]
`gelatin mannitol
`drug
`
`Drug content
`per tablet [mg]
`
`Surface of tablets Durability of tablets Removal from
`the blisters
`
`0.5
`0.75
`1.0
`2.0
`2.0
`
`5,0
`
`3.0
`
`1.0
`
`5
`
`-
`
`0.1 FNa (solution)
`1.0 FNa (solution)
`10.0 FNa (solution)
`0.1 F (solution)
`0.5 F (suspension)
`1.0 F (suspension)
`
`-
`
`PLACEBO
`porous, burst
`porous
`porous
`porous
`porous
`TABLET WITH DRUG
`2.0
`porous, irregular
`20.0
`porous, irregular
`200
`porous, burst
`2.0
`10.0
`20.0
`
`porous, irregular
`
`very fragile
`fragile
`durable
`hard
`hard
`
`durable
`durable
`hard and fragile
`
`stable, hard
`
`-
`+/-
`+
`-
`-
`
`+
`+
`+/-
`
`+
`
`(+) the tablet can be easily taken out from the blister;
`(-) the tablet sticks to the blister and can not be removed without damage
`
`Mylan Ex 1038, Page 2
`
`

`

`The physical characteristics of lyophilized tablets containing a model drug...
`
`27
`
`Figure 1. Deformation curves of tablets prepared with phenobar-
`bital sodium, FNa (0.1% and 1.0% solution) and phenobarbital, F
`(0.1% solution); error bars ± SD (n=10).
`
`Figure 2. The effect of localization of the blisters on a freeze-dryer
`shelf (peripheral or central) on deformation curves of tablets con-
`taining phenobarbital sodium (0.1% solution).
`
`first one, a Ph. Eur. disintegration apparatus (Phar-
`ma Test, Hamburg, Germany) was used. Tablets
`were placed in cylinders on the bottom mesh, bur-
`dened with disks and immersed in water at room
`temperature or 37oC. The time required for com-
`plete disintegration of each tablet was recorded. In
`the second method, the tablets were placed in a plas-
`tic syringe funnel on a blotting paper covered with
`glass pellets. The time required for 5 mL of water to
`pass through the syringe was measured.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`In the first step of the studies the best ratio of
`gelatin to mannitol was established in order to for-
`mulate freeze-dried matrices of satisfying mechani-
`cal characteristics. In Table 1 the investigated com-
`positions of placebo tablets are shown. On the basis
`of visual inspection and evaluation of adhesion to
`the blister as well as on the integrity after removing
`from a blister formulation composed of mannitol
`and gelatin in ratio 5:1 was chosen as optimum. This
`composition of structure-forming excipients was
`used for preparation of lyophilized tablets with F
`and FNa. All tablets obtained by the lyophilisation
`process were white and porous, their shape was
`cylindrical, corresponding to the shape of the blister
`well. Tablets containing up to 20 mg of F or FNa
`(14.3% of the total mass) had satisfying appearance,
`and they did not differ visually. The increase of the
`amount of FNa to 200 mg per tablet (62% of total
`mass) resulted in increased hardness and, finally,
`tablets could not be removed from blister without
`braking (Table 1).
`
`Figure 3. Changes in weight of lyophilized tablets containing dif-
`ferent concentrations of model drugs during 4 weeks of storage at
`room temperature and 40% and 60% RH (error bars ± SD, n=6): F
`ñ phenobarbital, FNa ñ phenobarbital sodium (a and b ñ two dif-
`ferent batches)
`
`A standard hardness tester used for com-
`pressed tablets was not appropriate to study
`strength of the lyophilized tablets since they did
`not break during the test. This is why the applica-
`bility of another instrument, a universal material
`testing machine Instron, was investigated. The
`results of the mechanical studies performed with
`this apparatus are shown in Figure 1. The curves
`indicate that the matrices are plastic: an increasing
`
`Mylan Ex 1038, Page 3
`
`

`

`28
`
`MA£GORZATA SZNITOWSKA et al.
`
`force caused deformation without breaking the
`tablets.
`At the initial step gradual deformation up to
`70% was observed with small forces applied, but
`30%-50% further increase in the force was required
`to get 80% deformation. The relationship between
`force and deformation is described by the curves
`which are linear in three segments: I ñ up to 20%, II
`ñ between 20% and 70%, III ñ above 70% deforma-
`tion. The initial 20% deformation occurs when the
`fragile lyophilizate structure is crushed, the step II
`corresponds to the deformation which is caused by
`compression of the porous matrix, while only at
`higher loads the structure of a tablet is completely
`destroyed (step III). The force required for 20%
`deformation can be a measure of resistance to crush-
`ing, and the one responsible for step II can be relat-
`ed to porosity and plasticity of the tablets. The
`slopes of the curve segments (aI and aII values)
`were calculated using linear regression analysis. On
`the basis of these parameters it can be assumed that
`the chemical and physical form of an active sub-
`stance influences the mechanical strength and the
`structure of the lyophilized tablets. The use of F in
`acidic form resulted in lower mechanical strength
`(aI=0.38 N/%) in comparison with tablets contain-
`ing FNa (aI=0.98 N/%), however the compression
`response at step II was similar: aII=0.31 and 0.34
`N/%, respectively. This means that faster precipita-
`tion and crystallization of a slightly soluble drug (F)
`resulted in the structure less resistant to crushing,
`however the porosity and plasticity of the matrix
`was similar. For FNa tablets the crushing resistance
`was similar, independent of concentration (aI=0.98
`N/%), but increased drug concentration resulted in a
`less porous and plastic structure, what can be
`demonstrated by higher aII values: 0.62 N/% for
`1.0% FNa formulation and 0.34 N/% for 0.1% FNa
`formulation. This indicates that FNa contributes to
`the structure-forming process. For FNa formulations
`good reproducibility of the curves was observed
`(RSD <15%).
`The results demonstrate that the Instron appa-
`ratus can be suitable for the mechanical analysis of
`lyophilized tablets. A comparison between the
`mechanical properties of tablets located at the
`peripheral and in the central part of the shelf in a
`freeze-dryer was done. The location of the blister
`during lyophilization may be important for the prop-
`erties of tablets because different time of freezing
`was observed ñ shorter for tablets in the peripheries.
`The deformation curves for one batch of tablets con-
`taining 0.1% FNa are shown in Figure 2. Small dif-
`ference in the mechanical behaviour was noted ñ
`
`tablets from the central part of the shelf, freezing
`slower, were more resistant, however the difference
`was not statistically significant. Corveleyn and
`Remon (4) reported that faster freezing results in
`higher degree of supercooling with the formation of
`small crystals. Small ice crystals result in a higher
`surface area and higher degree of porosity after
`lyophilisation, what can explain a decreased
`strength of the peripheral tablets.
`Lyophilized tablets show significant porosity,
`and one can expect that they can absorb moisture
`very easily. To determine hygroscopic properties,
`the tablets were stored in three levels of the relative
`humidity ñ 40%, 60% and 90%. The most intensive
`water uptake occurred at 90% RH and this resulted
`in tablet shrinkage. In Figure 3, the changes in tablet
`weights after 4 week storage at 40% and 60% RH
`are demonstrated. Only a small increase in moisture
`content was noted. This increase was higher at 60%
`RH (2,7%), compared to 40% RH (about 1%). A
`very small moisture enhancement does not allow for
`conclusion whether type of the drug and its concen-
`tration influences hygroscopic properties of tablets.
`Besides, the evaluation of two batches of tablets
`containing 0.1% FNa (a and b, Figure 3) shows that
`the difference within one formulation can be larger
`than between different formulations.
`All lyophilized tablets rapidly disintegrated
`in water regardless of the method of analysis. Due
`to a very short time of the process it could not be
`possible to define the disintegration time precise-
`ly. At 37oC all tablets disintegrated in few seconds
`and at room temperature disintegration time varied
`from 14 s to 2.5 min., but no influence of either
`drug form or concentration was observed. If the
`syringe apparatus was employed, the jelly struc-
`ture was formed due to the presence of gelatin, and
`this stopped the flow of water. This means that a
`new adequate method for analysis of disintegra-
`tion time of the freeze-dried tablets should be
`searched.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`The results demonstrate that the ratio 5:1 of
`mannitol and gelatin as matrix formers is appropri-
`ate to obtain freeze-dried fast dissolving tablets.
`Chemical form, the concentration of the drug and
`physical properties of the freeze-dried liquid (solu-
`tion or suspension), have a significant influence on
`the mechanical strength of tablets. Even though the
`lyophilizates were porous, they did not absorb water
`during at least monthly storage in 60% RH. Further
`studies should be carried out in order to develop a
`
`Mylan Ex 1038, Page 4
`
`

`

`The physical characteristics of lyophilized tablets containing a model drug...
`
`29
`
`new method for determination of disintegration time
`of lyophilized tablets.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`The Authors would like to thank Prof. Ass.
`Maria Sadowska and M.sc. Robert Tylingo from
`Department of Food Chemistry and Technology of
`Technical University of GdaÒsk for their contribu-
`tion in the analysis of tablets with the Instron appa-
`ratus.
`
`1. Seager H.: J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 50, 375 (1998).
`2. Dobetti L.: Pharm. Tech. Eur 9, 32 (2000).
`3. Rote Liste: Editio Cantor Verlag, Aulendorf
`2003.
`4. Corveleyn S., Remon J. P .: Int. J. Pharm. 152,
`215 (1997).
`
`Received: 3.08.2004
`
`Mylan Ex 1038, Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket