throbber
Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`First Named Inventor: Jiang
`
`Application No.: 13/597,884
`
`Filed: August 29, 2012
`
`Title: Levothyroxine Formulations
`
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`Examiner: Kara R. McMillian
`
`Docket No.: FKA01 007 US
`
`AMENDMENT AND RESPONSE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.116
`
`Mail Stop RCE
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`This communication responds to the Office Action mailed on April 3, 2013.
`
`Applicants respectfully request that Examiner McMillian reconsider the rejections in
`
`view of the following amendments and remarks. This paper is believed to be timely
`
`filed.
`
`Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of claims beginning on
`
`page 2.
`
`Remarks begin on page 7.
`
`Declaration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.132 is included with the response.
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 1
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`IN THE CLAIMS:
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`In accord with Rule § 1.121, a complete claim listing is presented below. A
`
`status identifier (Original) or (Currently Amended) precedes each claim. The changes
`
`in amended claims are shown by strikethrough or double brackets for deleted material,
`
`and by underlining for added material.
`
`1. (cid:9)
`
`(Currently Amended) (cid:9)
`
`A composition, comprising:
`
`from 100 to 500 micrograms of levothyroxine sodium, and
`
`from 1 to 5 milligrams mannitol;
`
`where the composition is a lyophilized solid.
`
`2.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 1, where the amount of mannitol is from 2
`
`to 4 milligrams.
`
`3.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 1, where the amount of mannitol is from
`
`2.9 to 3.1 milligrams.
`
`4.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 1, further comprising a phosphate buffer.
`
`5.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 4, further comprising a base;
`
`where, when the composition is reconstituted in 5 milliliters of 0.9% aqueous
`
`sodium chloride, the pH of the reconstituted liquid is from 9.5 to 11.5.
`
`6.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 5, where the amount of mannitol is from
`
`2.9 to 3.1 milligrams.
`
`7.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 5, where the composition is formed by
`
`forming a liquid mixture by combining
`
`the levothyroxine sodium,
`
`2
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 2
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`the mannitol,
`
`dibasic sodium phosphate,
`
`a solvent comprising water, and
`
`a base; and
`
`lyophilizing the liquid mixture.
`
`8.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 7, where the amount of dibasic sodium
`
`phosphate in the liquid mixture is from 400 to 600 micrograms.
`
`9.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 1, where when the composition is stored at
`
`25 °C, at most 0.20% of the levothyroxine sodium is converted to liothyronine over a
`
`period of 12 months.
`
`10.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 1, where when the composition is stored at
`
`40 °C, at most 0.20% of the levothyroxine sodium is converted to liothyronine over a
`
`period of 3 months.
`
`11.
`
`(Currently Amended) (cid:9)
`
`A composition, comprising:
`
`from 100 to 200 micrograms of levothyroxine sodium, and
`
`mannitol;
`
`where the mass ratio of mannitol to levothyroxine sodium is at most 40:1, and
`
`the composition is a lyophilized solid.
`
`12.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 11, where the amount of levothyroxine
`
`sodium is about 100 micrograms.
`
`13.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 12, where the mass ratio of mannitol to
`
`levothyroxine sodium is at most 30:1.
`
`14. (cid:9)
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 13, further comprising a phosphate buffer.
`
`-3
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 3
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`15.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 14, where the composition is formed by
`
`forming a liquid mixture by combining
`
`the levothyroxine sodium,
`
`the mannitol,
`
`dibasic sodium phosphate, and
`
`a solvent comprising water; and
`
`lyophilizing the liquid mixture.
`
`16.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 15, where the amount of dibasic sodium
`
`phosphate in the liquid mixture is from 400 to 600 micrograms.
`
`17.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 11, where the amount of levothyroxine
`
`sodium is about 200 micrograms.
`
`18.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 17, where the mass ratio of mannitol to
`
`levothyroxine sodium is at most 15:1.
`
`19.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 18, further comprising a phosphate buffer.
`
`20.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 19, where the composition is formed by
`
`forming a liquid mixture by combining
`
`the levothyroxine sodium,
`
`the mannitol,
`
`dibasic sodium phosphate, and
`
`a solvent comprising water; and
`
`lyophilizing the liquid mixture.
`
`21.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 20, where the amount of dibasic sodium
`
`phosphate in the liquid mixture is from 400 to 600 micrograms.
`
`-4
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 4
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`22.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 11, where when the composition is stored
`
`at 25 °C, at most 0.20°/0 of the levothyroxine sodium is converted to liothyronine over a
`
`period of 12 months.
`
`23.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 11, where when the composition is stored
`
`at 40 °C, at most 0.20°/0 of the levothyroxine sodium is converted to liothyronine over a
`
`period of 3 months.
`
`24.
`
`(Currently Amended) (cid:9)
`
`A composition, comprising:
`
`about 500 micrograms of levothyroxine sodium, and
`
`mannitol;
`
`where the mass ratio of mannitol to levothyroxine sodium is at most 10:1, and
`
`the composition is a lyophilized solid.
`
`25.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 24, where the mass ratio of mannitol to
`
`levothyroxine sodium is at most 6:1.
`
`26.
`
`(Currently Amended) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 25, further comprising a
`
`phosphate buffer;_
`
`27.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 26, where the composition is formed by
`
`forming a liquid mixture by combining
`
`the levothyroxine sodium,
`
`the mannitol,
`
`dibasic sodium phosphate, and
`
`a solvent comprising water; and
`
`lyophilizing the liquid mixture.
`
`28.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 27, where the amount of dibasic sodium
`
`phosphate in the liquid mixture is from 400 to 600 micrograms dibasic sodium phosphate.
`
`5
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 5
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`29.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 24, where when the composition is stored
`
`at 25 °C, at most 0.15% of the levothyroxine sodium is converted to liothyronine over a
`
`period of 12 months.
`
`30.
`
`(Original) (cid:9)
`
`The composition of claim 24, where when the composition is stored
`
`at 40 °C, at most 0.15% of the levothyroxine sodium is converted to liothyronine over a
`
`period of 3 months.
`
`6
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 6
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`Status of the Claims
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`REMARKS
`
`Claims 1-30 are pending. Claims 1, 11, 24, and 26 are amended. The
`
`application is no longer under Track I prioritized examination as a final rejection was
`
`issued.
`
`Support for the Amendment
`
`Support for the amendments to claims 1, 11, and 24 is found in the originally
`
`filed dependent claims 7, 15, 20, and 27. Additional description regarding
`
`lyophilization is found in paragraphs [0014] and [0018] of the specification, for
`
`example. Paragraph [0014] states that the solid composition is formed through
`
`lyophilization, while paragraph [0018] defines lyophilization. Claim 26 is amended to
`
`correct a typographical error. Thus, no new matter has been added. In view of the
`
`following amendments and remarks, Applicants respectfully request reconsideration of
`
`the application.
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Applicants would like to thank Examiner McMillian for the courteous and
`
`helpful discussion with Applicants' representatives on April 30, 2013. Independent
`
`claim 1 was discussed with respect to the cited references in the context of the
`
`outstanding obviousness rejection. Applicants' representatives also discussed that
`
`evidence from the specification of non-obviousness was presented in Applicants'
`
`response of February 11, 2013. Applicants' representatives discussed the results
`
`depicted in FIGs. 2 and 3 of the specification as highlighted in the response, which
`
`show that the stability of levothyroxine in the claimed compositions was surprising and
`
`unexpected in view of conventional injectable formulations. An agreement regarding
`
`the claims was not reached during the interview.
`
`Applicants also would like to thank Examiner McMillian and Supervisor
`
`Padmanabhan for the courteous and helpful discussion with Applicants' representatives
`
`7
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 7
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`on May 29, 2013. During this discussion, the independent claims were discussed in
`
`relation to Mitra, Bedford, and Collier in the context of the outstanding obviousness
`
`rejection. Applicants discussed the requirements for a prima facie rejection and for
`
`maintaining an obviousness rejection in the face of evidence from the specification of
`
`unexpected results. Potential amendments to the independent claims were discussed
`
`to further distinguish the inventions from the cited art. Applicants' representatives
`
`agreed to submit a response with declaratory support. An agreement regarding the
`
`claims was not reached during the interview.
`
`Applicants also would like to thank Examiner McMillian for discussing a draft
`
`declaration under 37 CFR § 1.132 and proposed claim amendments with Applicants'
`
`representative on July 26, 2013. The contents of the declaration and proposed claim
`
`amendments were discussed in the context of unexpected results and the independent
`
`claims. An agreement regarding the claims was not reached during the interview.
`
`Applicants agreed to file a RCE including the signed declaration and proposed claim
`
`amendments.
`
`REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
`
`In lyophilized solid compositions including levothyroxine sodium and mannitol,
`
`the stability of levothyroxine may be improved by lowering the mass of mannitol
`
`and/or the mass ratio of mannitol to levothyroxine sodium to a level below that of
`
`conventional levothyroxine compositions. (Specification, par. [0032]). Conventional
`
`levothyroxine lyophilized solid compositions include 10 milligrams (mg) mannitol and
`
`either 200 or 500 micrograms (,ug) levothyroxine sodium, corresponding to mass ratios
`
`of mannitol to levothyroxine sodium (M:L) of 50:1 and 20:1, respectively. Surprisingly,
`
`improved stability of levothyroxine was obtained by lowering the amount of mannitol
`
`to 1 to 5 mg. In compositions having either 200 or 500 ,ug levothyroxine sodium, this
`
`range of mannitol corresponds to M:L ratios of from 5:1 to 25:1 or from 2:1 to 10:1,
`
`respectively. (Specification, par. [0025]).
`
`8
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 8
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`As amended, independent claims 1, 11, and 24 are directed to lyophilized solid
`
`compositions including levothyroxine sodium and mannitol, where the amount of
`
`mannitol is lowered in relation to conventional compositions, but the stability of the
`
`levothyroxine is increased in relation to the conventional compositions. Each
`
`independent claim recites different lowered mannitol compositions. Claim 1 recites
`
`that the lyophilized solid includes from 100 to 500 micrograms of levothyroxine
`
`sodium and from 1 to 5 milligrams mannitol. Claim 11 recites that the lyophilized
`
`solid includes from 100 to 200 micrograms of levothyroxine sodium and mannitol,
`
`where the mass ratio of mannitol to levothyroxine sodium is at most 40:1. Claim 24
`
`recites that the lyophilized solid includes about 500 micrograms of levothyroxine
`
`sodium and mannitol, where the mass ratio of mannitol to levothyroxine sodium is at
`
`most 10:1.
`
`§ 103. The Claims are Not Obvious in View of the Cited Art
`
`The rejection of all the pending claims as obvious over U.S. 5,955,105 to Mitra
`
`et al. (Mitra) or over the Bedford Laboratories Product label dated May 2003 (Bedford)
`
`or over Collier et al., "Influence of Formulation and Processing Factors on Stability of
`
`Levothyroxine Sodium Pentahydrate", APPS PharmSiTech 11(2), 2010, 818-825
`
`(Collier) is respectfully traversed.
`
`As established by the included declaration under 37 CFR § 1.132 from the
`
`inventors of the present application, the cited references fail to teach lyophilized solid
`
`compositions including the claimed critical relative amounts of levothyroxine sodium
`
`and mannitol. Neither do the cited references, alone or in combination, provide any
`
`motivation to adjust or to try to adjust the concentration of a single excipient in an
`
`attempt to affect levothyroxine stability in a lyophilized solid composition, nor that
`
`levothyroxine stability could be affected with such adjustment. As the references are
`
`silent in this regard, an expectation of successfully increasing levothyroxine stability
`
`with such adjustment could not exist as the references teach that excipient type, not
`
`9
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 9
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`relative excipient amount, affect stability of the resulting compositions. (See Collier, for
`
`example).
`
`The declaration also establishes that both the type of stability result and the
`
`degree of stability result obtained from the relative amounts of mannitol to
`
`levothyroxine of Tables 1-3 of the specification were unexpected and of practical
`
`significance, as a longer shelf life was achieved for the lyophilized solid. The stability
`
`results obtained from the relative amounts of mannitol to levothyroxine provided in
`
`Tables 1-3 of the specification were unexpected at least because the inventors expected
`
`a formulation in accord with Bedford to have the desired stability.
`
`The declaration also establishes that lyophilized solids have different physical
`
`structures and reactivities than a solid that is dissolved in liquid or than a solid that is
`
`compressed to form a tablet. Thus, any document or study that discusses levothyroxine
`
`stability in water or in a compressed tablet would not be referenced or helpful for
`
`developing a lyophilized formulation of levothyroxine.
`
`In view of the proffered evidence of unexpected results, the Office may no
`
`longer maintain the assertion that the limitations of the pending claims are obvious over
`
`the cited art, and Applicants respectfully request withdrawal of the rejection under
`
`35 USC § 103.
`
`-10-
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 10
`
`

`

`Serial No. 13/597,884 (cid:9)
`
`Conclusion
`
`PATENT
`Docket No. FKA01_007_US
`
`The Applicants believe the Examiner's concerns have been addressed to
`
`overcome the rejections. Upon the indication of allowable subject matter, the
`
`Examiner is respectfully requested to telephone Jonathan M. Blanchard at (312) 612-
`
`6700 to resolve any outstanding issues as expeditiously as possible so the case may be
`
`passed to issue.
`
`August 9, 2013 (cid:9)
`Date (cid:9)
`
`Blanchard & Associates
`566 West Adams Street
`Suite 600
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Docketing@blanchard-patent.corn
`Tel. (312) 612-6700
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Jonathan M. Blanchard, Reg. No. 48927/
`Jonathan M. Blanchard, Ph.D.
`Patent Attorney
`Reg. No. 48,927
`
`-11-
`
`Mylan Ex 1037, Page 11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket