throbber
.Phormaceutical Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1992
`
`Report
`
`Kinetics of Degradation of
`Levothyroxine in; Aqueous Solution
`and in Solid State
`
`Chong Min Wonl
`
`Received January 23, 1991; accepted August 27, 1991
`The kinetics of the deiodination of levothyroxine in aqueous solu-
`tion were studied over the pH range 1 to 12. Temperature depen-
`dence .of the reaction was also studied. The log k (cid:9)
`pH profile
`indicated that the kinetics of deiodination include proton attack on
`the anion and .dianion in acidic sohition and water attack on the
`anion and dianion in alkaline solution. A possible mechanism of the.
`.deiodination was discussed:The 'solid-state xtability of levothyrox-
`ine sodium was studied at elevated. temperatures; and the compound
`was found to undergo deamination on heating. The decomposition
`follows biphasic first-order kinetics, with the most rapid decompo-
`sition occurring at the beginning of heating.
`KEY WORDS: levothyroxine; liothyronine; degradation, deiodina-
`tion; pH effect; solid-state stability.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`• LeVothyroxine sodium is the sodium salt of the levo-
`isomer of thyroxine (T4), an active physiological compound
`found in the thyroid gland. Preparations oftheSYnthetic horl
`nione are indidated in replacement or supplegiental therapy-
`for patients with hypothyroidism and as 'pituitary thyroid
`stimulating hormone suppressants in the treatment of etithy-
`roid goiters (1). (cid:9)
`'
`. (cid:9)
`,
`Deiodination occurs- as a resultof ultraviolet irradiation
`in aqueous media, and the deiodination process was propor-
`' tional to the decrease in the pH of the aqueouS solution (2).
`When T4 labeled with '31I was administered intravenously to
`normal htimans, most labeled iodine eventually appeared in
`the urine as free inorganic iodide (3). The possible physio-
`logical significance of the deiodination . of the thyroid hor-
`mone caused many investigators to study the process both in
`vitro and in vivo. The deiodination of T, occurred in kidney,
`brain, liver, and muscle homogenate preparations. There
`was, however, only limited evidence for liothyronine (T3)
`formation (4),
`Despite a long history. of its use, the in vitro degradation
`studies of T4 appearing in the above literature were of de-
`scriptive nature, providing limited kinetic information. The
`purpose of this study was to obtain kinetic data on the deg-
`radation of T4 in solution and in solid state and to investigate.
`possible mechanIsms of the degradation 'processes. This
`Study was, not intended to predict the in vivo transformation
`of the dnig.
`
`' Analytical and Physical Chemistry' Department, Rhone-Poulenc
`Rorer Central Research, 500 Virginia Drive, Building No. 5, Fort
`Washington, Pennsylvania 19034.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`Levothyroxine sodium and liothyronine were obtained
`'from Biochemie (Austria) and Aldrich Chernical (Milwau-
`kee, WI), respectively. Water used for kinetics was deign-
`ized and distilled. Acetonitrile used was - HPLC grade. All
`the chemicals used were reagent grade and were used as
`received. TLC plates, were obtained from Analtech (New-
`ark, DE).
`
`HPLC Analysis
`
`The chromatography system consisted of an isocratic
`pump (Beckman Model 110A); an automatic injector (IBM
`LC/9504), a variable-wavelength UV detector (LDC Spec-
`tromonitor III), and a computing integrator (Hitachi D-2000). -
`The HPLC method eMplOyed a 250 x
`particle size, cyan-bonded silica column (Phenomenex) and
`a mobile phase consisting of wateracetonitrile:phoaphoric
`acid (600:400:1, v/v). The flow. rate was 1.5 ml/min and the
`detector wavelength for. ultraviolet absorbance detection
`was 225 nm. (cid:9)
`•
`
`Solution Degradation Product .
`
`Approximately 500 rag of levothyroxine sodium was dis-
`solved in 70 ml of 0.01 N NaOH and refluxed for 40 hr. The
`solution was then neutralized by adding concentrated HCI
`dropwise and evaporated to dryness using a-rotary evapora-
`tor. The residue was extracted-with 50 ml of acetonitrile. The
`acetonitrile solution was concentrated, -streaked across a
`14mm-thick silica get OF. preparative TLC plate, and devel- •
`oped with a solvent system consisting of methylene chloride: .
`acetonitrile:formic acid (80:10:10). Using the TLC system, a
`T. spot showed at Rf 0.27 and a, major degradate spot at- RI
`0.18. The band corresponding to /21.0.18 was removed front
`the plate and eluted with 50 ml of 0.01 N methanolic NaOH
`solution. The eluent was acidified by adding concentrated
`HCl dropwise and the'resultant precipitate was centrifuged.
`The supernatant was decanted and the solid was dried under
`vacuum at 60°C for 2 hr.
`The electron impact mass spectrum' of the degradate
`was run on a VG 7070 SE mass spectrometer. The spectrum
`was obtained at 70 eV with the source temperature at 190°C.
`'The low-resolution mass spectrum exhibited a protonated
`molecular ion at m/z .651 corresponding to C15H12I3N04, loss
`of water (m/z 633), and loss of carbon dioxide (m/z 607). The
`proton NMR spectrum of the isolated degradate was re-
`corded on a Varian VXR 200 NMR spectrometer using deu-
`terated DMSO as the solvent. The proton NMR spectrum of
`the degradate showed a doublet (6.91. and 6.95 ppm) corre-.
`sponding to the hydrogen atom which had replaced, iodine at
`either the 3', or the 5' carbon, a doublet (7.02 and 7.03 ppm),
`and a quadruplet (6.60, 6.62, 6.65 and 6.66 ppm), corre-
`sponding to the hydrogens at 2' and 6' carbons. The MS and
`NMR spectra were identical to those of authentic T3. The
`major degradation peak seen in an HPLC chromatogram of •
`T4 which had been partially degraded in acidic solution had
`a retention time identical to that of authentic Ts. The coin-
`
`07244741/320100-0131506.500 0 1992 Plenum Publishing tarporaloo
`
`Mylan Ex 1017, Page 1
`
`

`

`1
`
`Scheme I .
`
`ficients (5). In a typical kinetic experiment, 0.5 ml of 1 mg/m1
`levothyroxine sodium stock solution in methanol, an appro-
`priate amount of buffer stock solution, HCI or NaOH, and an
`appropriate amount of 1 M NaCI were transferred into a
`100-m1 volumetric flask and filled to volume with water. The
`final concentration of levothyroxine sodium was .5 ug/ml.
`The reaction flask was kept in a constant-temperature water
`bath at 50.0, 60.0, 70.0, and 80.0°C (±0.5°C). Aliquots of the
`sample were taken at appropriate time intervals and ana-
`, (cid:9)
`.
`lyzed by HPLC. (cid:9)
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Solubility—pH Profile
`
`T, has three ionizable moieties and it can exist as the
`cation (C), zwitterion (Z), anion (A), and dianion (DA), de-
`pending on the pH of the solution (Scheme I). The solubility—
`pH profile (Fig. 1) was used to determine the ionization con-
`
`jection 'of an acid-degraded T4 with authentic T3 resulted in
`one peak (chromatogram not shown).
`
`Solid-State Degradation Products
`
`Approximately 500 mg of levothyroxine sodium in an
`open vial was kept in an oven at 60°C for 7 weeks. The.
`degraded levoihyroxine sodium was suspended in 150 ml of
`a methanol and water mixture (30:70). The sample was com-
`pletely dissolved by dropwise addition of cone. NH,OH and
`subsequently acidified, by dropwise addition of conc. Ha.
`The resultant precipitate was filtered, dissolved in methanol,
`streaked across a 1-mm-thick silica gel GF plate, and devel-
`oped with a solvent system consisting of toluene:ethylace-
`tate:acetic acid (75:22:3). Using the TLC system, a T, spot
`showed at R10.05 and two major degradate spots at R10.89
`and 0.06. The bands corresponding to Rf 0.89 and Rf 0.60
`were separately removed from the plate and eluted with
`methanol. The eluent was evaporated to drynesk and the
`residue was dried at 60°C for 2 hr under vacuum. High-
`resolution EI-MS of the Rf 0.89 product showed a molecular
`ion. at m/z.717.6488 corresponding to. Ci3H6031, (calculated
`m/z 717.6494) and ions resulting from the two subsequent
`losses of iodine (m/z 591 +. H, 464). The other product (R,
`0.60) showed a protonated molecular ion at m/z 760.6638
`corresponding to C,51-191,04 (calculated m/z 760.6677) and
`ions resulting from loss of water (m/z 742) and loss of carbon
`dioxide (m/z 716).
`
`. Solubility—pH Profile
`
`•
`The solubility of levothyroxine sodium in aqueous
`buffer solution was determined as a function of pH ranging
`from 1 to 11. The buffers used were glycine (pH 1.0-3.7),
`acetate (pH 4.5-4.7), phosphate (pH 5.8-8.0), and carbonate
`(pH 9.3-11.0) buffers. The ionic strength was adjusted to 0.5.
`An excess amount of levothyroxine sodium was placed in a
`Screw-cap test tube containing the aqueous buffer solutions.
`The solution was shaken at 25°C on a rotary shaker until
`replicate analyses of the solution sampled at 4-hr intervals
`indicated that .a steady concentration had been reached.
`Eighteen hours of shaking sufficed for the equilibration. The
`undissolved solid was then separated by centrifugation. The
`pH of the solution was measured, and after appropriate di-
`lutions with the mobile phase, the sOlution.was analyzed by
`HPLC.
`
`• Kinetic Method
`
`The buffers used for kinetics were citrate (pH 3.2). ac-
`etate (pH 4.4-5.4), phosphate (pH 6.3-7.0), borate (pH 8.8),
`and carbonate (pH 9.6-10.7) buffers. Buffer stock solutions
`of 0.2 M were prepared. Aliquots of the buffer stock solu-
`tions and 1 M NaCI. solution were diluted so that the final
`total buffer concentration was 0.02 Mend the ionic strength.
`was at 0.1. Low buffer concentrations were used to minimize
`the possible, general acid—base catalysis by the buffer spe- (cid:9)
`cies. The pH of each solution was measured at the reaction
`temperature. For strongly acidic and basic solutions, aque-
`ous HCI or NaOH solutions were used to obtain the desired
`pH. The pH values of these solutions at the reaction tem- (cid:9)
`peratures were calculated from the published activity coef- (cid:9)
`
`-0.
`
`I (cid:9)
`
`2 (cid:9)
`
`3 (cid:9)
`
`• (cid:9)
`
`S (cid:9)
`
`7 (cid:9)
`
`91 (cid:9)
`
`9 (cid:9)
`
`10 (cid:9)
`
`12
`
`Plot of logarithm of solubility of T., as a function of pF1'at
`25°C.
`
`Mylan Ex 1017, Page 2
`
`

`

`Kinetics of Degradation of Levothyroxine
`
`133
`
`scants. (6). The equation for the solubility (S) of ts as a func-
`tion of, hydrogen ion activity up to pH 9.8 is given by
`• -
`S = So (I + [11')/K,,, + Ica/MI) (cid:9)
`(1)
`where So is the intrinsic solubility of Z. The value of So (0:25
`p.g/m1) was estimated from the best fit of the solubility—pH
`profile between pH 3 and pH 6. The pK„ values that gave the
`best fit to Eq. (1) are pKa, = 2.40 for. the carboxyl group and
`pK.2 = 6.87 for the phenolic OH group. The solubility—pH
`profile shows a break around pH 10 indicating a saturation
`
`solubility of A. As the pH increases above 10, the solubility
`increases as more DA is formed, in accordance with
`+ So' (1 + K,V[1-11) (cid:9)
`S (cid:9)
`(2)
`where So' is the maximum solubility of A. The So' (120 14,/
`m.1) and plc3 (9.96) values were estimated from the best fit of
`the solubility—pH profile above pH 10. The plc values de-
`termined under these conditions are slightly different from
`the published values of 2.2 for the carboxyl group, 6.7 for the
`phenolic group, and 10.1 for the amino group (7).
`
`100
`
`C
`
`o.
`
`m•
`CC
`
`to
`0 (cid:9)
`
`100 (cid:9)
`
`NO (cid:9)
`
`140 - (cid:9)
`
`150 (cid:9)
`
`CIO
`
`Time (Hours)
`Fig. 2. Typical fzst;order plots for the deiodination of T4 in aqueous solution at 80°C. pH 2.05 HP; pH 6.136 (6):
`pH 7,96 (A); pH 10.55 (•).
`
`Mylan Ex 1017, Page 3
`
`

`

`•
`
`e•tentioa
`fa (11111•0 (cid:9) "
`Fig. 4. Typical HPLC chromatograms of partially degraded sam-
`ples. (a) T4 in acidic solution."(b) T. in alkaline solution. (c) T, in
`acidic solution. (d) T, in alkaline solution. T. (A); T3 031: (cid:9)
`(C);
`unknown (D). (cid:9)
`•
`
`amino group (pKA3 - 9.96) was ionized. The carboxyl and
`amino groups are too far away from the reaction center so
`that the ionization of these groups appears to have little res-
`onance or inductive effect'on the deiodination rate. •
`As shown in the log k - pH profile, the rate constant
`does not increase with increasing acidity in the strongly
`acidic region, indicating that there is no contribution to the
`rate constant from the proton attack on C and Z. The overall
`deiodination of T4 can be explained by apontaneous or wa-
`ter-catalyzed reactions (ke) of C and Z and spontaneous or
`water-catalyzed reactions (ke') of A and DA.. The deiodin-
`ation rate constant can be formulated as
`k = ke f.A + ko f A (cid:9)
`(3)
`where /HA atidfA are the sum of the fractions of C and Z and
`of A and DA, respectively. Equation (3) is kinetically equiv-
`alent to
`
`k = (cid:9)
`(4)
`[141 fA ko fA . (cid:9)
`where ke = kH Ka and kH is the catalytic rate constant for
`proton attack on A and DA. Substituting/A = Ka/([H*] +.
`Ka) in Eq. (4),
`
`6,-91 -..0011
`'
`
`2 (cid:9)
`
`2 (cid:9)
`
`• (cid:9)
`lo (cid:9)
`ll (cid:9)
`IZ (cid:9)
`12
`Fig. 3.. log k - pH profiles for the degradation of T. in aqueous
`solution at 50°C (0), 60°C (A), 70°C 0), and 80°C (0) and of T, at
`80°C RE.
`
`Lug k - pH Profile
`
`For all the kinetic experiments, the first-order plots for
`loss of T4 were linear (correlation coefficient >0.998) for two
`or more half-lives. Typical first-order plots are shown in Fig.
`2. The log k - pH profiles for. the deiodination of T4 are
`shown in Fig. 3. The rate of deiodination shows a plateau in
`the acidic pH region, drops off sigmoidally in the neutral pH
`region, and shows another plateau in the alkaline pH region.
`The log k -. pH profile shows a sigmoidal change only when
`the phenolic OH group, is ionized (p/Ca = 6.87). No change
`- was observed when the carboxyl group (pK," = 2.40) or
`
`Table 1. Catalytic Rate Constants,' Arrhenius Parameters,' and En-
`tropies of Activation for Deiodination of T.
`
`• k„
`(sec (cid:9) M'')
`
`Temperature
`• ("C)
`80.0 It. 0.5
`70.0 ± 0.5
`60.0 ± 0.5
`50.0 ± 0.5
`25.0'
`E. (kcal • mol-
`log A
`AS* (cal, molt K-1)
`° Where k =
`(Hi (cid:9)
`keV4•
`Where log k = -4/2.363 RT + log A.
`ExtrApolated from.E, and log A. (cid:9)
`
`14.3
`7.00
`3.16
`1.56
`0.165
`16.8 (cid:9)
`,
`11.5
`
`10' ke'
`(sec '')
`
`
`34.3
`20.8
`13.0
`6.95
`1.36
`12.1
`1.0
`-55.9
`
`NI-CH-COON Cr)).
`
`Scheme II
`
`Mylan Ex 1017, Page 4
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`Kinetics of Degradation of Levothyroxine
`
`135
`
`k = (cid:9)
`
`[Hi + koll([1-11 + K.,2) (cid:9)
`• (5)
`In the acidic pH region, ili+) S. K,2, and Eq. (5) reduces to
`k= kH K.2 ' (cid:9)
`
`(6)
`
`In the alkaline pH region, [11-1 4 K.2, and Eq. (5) reduces
`to
`
`k = ko (cid:9)
`
`(7)
`The catalytic rate constants, kH and ko', were estimated from
`the best fit of the log k — pH profiles (Table I). The Arrhe-
`nius parameters of the rate constants are included in Table I.
`
`•: (cid:9)
`
`Mechanism of Deiodination
`
`The HPLC chromatogram (Fig. 4a) of T. partially de-
`graded in acidic solution contains a peak with a retention
`time corresponding to that of T,. The HPLC chromatogram
`(Fig. 4b) of T. partially degraded in alkaline solution con-
`tains a peak with a retention time of 4.0 min , (Peak D) of an
`' (cid:9) unknown degradate but no peak corresponding to that of T5.
`When the initial concentration of T4 was increased above 5
`metiril in alkaline degradation, T, was found to be the major
`'degradate. The chromatogram (Fig. 4c) of T3 partially de-
`graded in acidic solution contains a peak with a retention
`time corresponding to that' of 3,5-diiodothyronine (T2). The
`chromatogram (Fig. 4d) of T, partially degraded in alkaline
`solution contains Peak D. (cid:9)
`•
`, When degraded under the same conditions as T. at
`80°C, T. was found to be more stable than T4 in acidic so-
`lution and less stable in alkaline solution (Fig. 3): In alkaline
`solution,, because T3, was found to be less stable than T. and
`because T3 was the major degradate at higher 14 concentra-
`tion, it can be assumed that T. degrades to T3 and Ts de-
`grades further to the unknown degradate (Peak D) as soon as
`• it is produced. At higher T4 concentrations, the high con-
`. centration of free iodonium ion in solution may play an im-
`. portant role in the deiodination rate (8).'At higher iodonium
`ion concentrations, the deiodination may follow a different
`rate law, and T, may become relatively stable.
`. The usual mechanism of the iodination of phenol is a
`two-step process involving an addition. of an iodonium ion to
`the carbon, followed by a loss of the hydrogen atom being
`replaced (9). According to the principle of microscopic re-
`versibility, the reverse sequence of these steps constitutes
`the favored mechanism for the reverse reaction, deiodin-
`ation.
`Among the four iodines in the T. molecule, those at the
`3' and 5' positions are more labile than those at the 3 and 5
`positions (3). The substituted phenoxide ion moiety gives 3'
`and 5' carbons carbanionic character by resonance so that
`these carbons are favored for electrophilic attack by proton
`or other electrophiles (Scheme II).
`, (cid:9)
`Even though' Eqs. (3) and (4) are kinetically equivalent,
`they imply different mechanisms for T. deiodination. A sim-
`ple pH. dependency study does not allow differentiation of
`the two equations and the possible mechanisms consistent
`with these equatiOns. However, because a proton should be
`a far more powerful electrophilethan water and because the
`substituted phenoxide ion should be vastly more reactive
`than the substituted phenol, it is very likely that the proton-
`
`CW.CMC00...
`
`Scheme III
`
`ation is due to proton attack on the anion and dianion in
`acidic solution rather than water attack on the cation and
`zwitterion. The protonation in alkaline 'solution may be due
`'to water attack on the anion and dianion. Therefore; the
`reaction scheme consistent with Eq. (4) is a more likely
`mechanism than that defined by Eq. (3).
`
`Solid-State Degradation
`
`Low assay values area concern of most manufacturers
`of levothyroxine sodium products, and in all probability, it-
`might be attributable to solid-state instability of the drug
`substance (10).
`
`In Contrast to its solution degradation, levothyroxine
`sodium does not deiodinate in solid state. Rather, the iso-
`lated degradation products indicate a deaminatiOn reaction
`(Scheme. III). Plots showing the rates of solid-state degrada-
`tion are presented in Fig. 5. The solid-state degradation ex-
`hibited biphaiic first-order degradation profiles indicating
`the possibility of complex degradation pathways. Correla-
`tion-coefficients of no less than 0.994 were obtained for lin-
`ear portions of the first-order plots. The initial rate of deg-
`radation is much greater than that obtained in the later part
`of the degradation curve at all temperatures. The rapid deg-
`radation phase is more pronounced at higher temperatures.
`As the temperature is lowered, the initial phase becomes
`shorter compared to the later phase. The initial phase is
`almost nonexistent at 50°C. It appears that there is a thresh-
`old temperature between 50 and 60°C where levothyroxine
`sodium degrades rapidly. The biphasic degradation kinetics
`of levothyroxine sodium can be described by
`
`D = 13„ (A e -4' B (cid:9)
`
`- (cid:9)
`
`(8)
`
`Table O. First-Order Rate Constant for Degradation of T. in Solid
`State in Accordance with D = D,, (A e-4. 4- B e-41'
`
`Temperature CC) (cid:9)
`50 ± 2
`60 ± 2
`70 ± 2
`80 it 2 • (cid:9)
`
`k, (sec-') (cid:9)
`
`10' kb (see
`
`7.19
`
`1.71
`3.97
`7,47
`
`Mylan Ex 1017, Page 5
`
`

`

`136
`
`Won
`
`i0 It 14 10 as so se 24 28 28 38
`
`rime (DayB)
`Fig. 5. Solid-state degradation of levothyroxine sodium at 50°C (41), 60°C (A), 70°C (1)), and 80°C (M).
`
`where D. and D are the drug amounts of levothyroxine so-
`dium at time 0 and r, respectively, A and ic are 'the intercept
`and slope of the rapid phase, and B and kb are the intercept
`and slope of the slow phase. For practical purposes, the kb
`Value in the rapid phase is more critical'than the kb value in
`the slow phase, since the former contributes more to the first
`10% T4 loss. Unfortunately, it was not possible to determine
`the initial rate of degradation at lower temperatures with
`reasonable accuracy, because the initial rapid degradation
`phase is shorter at lower temperatures. The first-order rate
`constants obtained by feathering (10) are listed in Table II.
`
`The initial degradation rate at 80°C is approximately 10 times
`faster than that of the later phase.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`The author thanks Ms. C. Strohbeck for NMR spectra,
`Dr. S. Kelly and Mr. J. deKanel for mass spectral analysis,
`and Dr. C. Obetz for helpful comments.
`REFERENCES
`
`I. E. R. Barnhart. Physicians' Desk Reference; Medical Econom-
`ics, Oradell, NJ, 1989, pp. 1830-1831.
`
`Mylan Ex 1017, Page 6
`
`

`

`Kinetics of Degradation of Levothyroxine
`
`137
`
`2. A. L. Reviczky and S. B. Nagy. Ontersuchung der Thyroxinde-
`Iodisation mit instrumenteller analytischer Methods. Endokri•
`nologie 56:81-91 (1970). (cid:9)
`• -
`3. J. B. Stanbury. Deiodination of the iodinated amino acids. Ann.
`N. Y. Acad. Sci. 86 (Part 2):417-439 (1960).
`4. T. Jahn, G. 'Morreale de Escobar, and F. Escobar del Rey.
`Pitfalls in studies of in vitro deiodination of thyroxine. Endocri-
`nology 78:7-15 (1966).
`5. H. S. Hamed and B. B. Owen. The Physical Chemistry of Elec-
`trolyte Solutions, Reinhold, New York, 1958, p. 716. .
`6. B. H. Lippold and J. F. Lichey. Loslichkeits-pH Profile mehr-
`protoniger Arzneistoffe am Beispiel des assoziierenden Dimet.
`indent and des zwitterionischen Liothyronines. Arch. Pharm.
`(Weinheim) 314:541-556 (1981). (cid:9)
`•
`7. A. Post and R. J. Warren. Sodium levothyroxine. In K. Florey
`
`(ed.), Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances. Vol. 5, Academic
`Press, New York, 1976, pp. 226-281. .
`B. E. Gravenstein, Jr., and N. S. Aprahamian. Aromatic Haloge-
`nation. II. Kinetics and mechanism of iodination of 4-nitrophe-
`nol and 4-nitropheno1-2,6-4 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84:212-220
`(1962).
`9. 1. Hine. Physical Organic Chemistry, McGraw-Hill, New
`York, 1962, p. 358.
`10. J. F. Brower, D. Y. Toler, and ). C. Reepmeyer. Determination
`of sodium levothyroxine in bulk, tablet, and injection formula-
`tions by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Pharm.
`Sci. 73:1315-1317 (1984).
`11. A. A. Frost and R. G. Pearson. Kinetics and Mechanism,
`Wiley, New York, 1961, pp. 162-164.
`
`-5
`
`6
`
`Mylan Ex 1017, Page 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket