throbber
I IIIII IIIIIIII Ill lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll 111111111111111111
`US008142763B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`Lewis et al.
`
`(IO) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 8,142,763 B2
`*Mar.27,2012
`
`(54) PRESSURIZED METERED DOSE INHALERS
`(MDI) CONTAINING A SOLUTION
`COMPRISING IPRATROPIUM BROMIDE,
`HFA PROPELLANT, AND CO-SOLVENT AND
`COMPRISING A CONTAINER WITH A
`SPECIFIC INTERNAL SURFACE
`COMPOSITION AND/OR LINING
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: David Lewis, Parma (IT); David
`Ganderton, Parma (IT); Brian Meakin,
`Bath (GB); Paolo Ventura, Parma (IT);
`Gaetano Brambilla, Parma (IT);
`Raffaella Garzia, Parma (IT)
`
`(73) Assignee: Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma (IT)
`
`( *) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 666 days.
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 12/023,315
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Jan.31,2008
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2008/0115782 Al
`
`May 22, 2008
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`(63) Continuation of application No. 09/831,888, filed as
`application No. PCT/EP99/09002 on Nov. 23, 1999,
`now Pat. No. 7,347,199.
`
`(30)
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Nov. 25, 1998
`Jul. 30, 1999
`
`(IT) .................................. MI98A2559
`(IT) .................................. MI99Al 712
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`A61K 9/00
`(2006.01)
`A61K 9/08
`(2006.01)
`A61K 9/12
`(2006.01)
`(52) U.S. Cl. ......................................................... 424/45
`(58) Field of Classification Search ..................... 424/45
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`3,361,306 A
`1/1968 Grim
`3,622,653 A
`11/1971 Ryden
`1/1980 Rovee et al.
`4,185,100 A
`2/ 1985 Sequeira et al.
`4,499,108 A
`4,579,854 A
`4/1986 Iwakuma et al.
`5/1989 MacDonald
`4,835,145 A
`5,192,528 A
`3/ 1993 Radhakrishnan et al.
`5,415,853 A
`5/1995 Hettche et al.
`5,435,297 A
`7/1995 Klein
`5,605,674 A
`2/1997 Purewal et al.
`7 I 1997 Andersson et al.
`5,642,728 A
`5,653,961 A
`8/1997 McNally et al.
`5,676,930 A
`10/1997 Jager
`5,683,677 A
`11/1997 Purewal et al.
`5,695,743 A
`12/1997 Purewal et al.
`
`5,891,419 A
`5,954,047 A
`5,955,058 A
`6,004,537 A
`6,006,745 A
`6,026,808 A
`6,045,778 A
`6,131,566 A
`6,143,277 A
`6,149,892 A
`6,150,418 A
`6,241,969 Bl
`6,253,762 Bl
`6,290,930 Bl
`6,315,985 Bl
`6,413,496 Bl
`6,451,285 B2
`6,645,466 Bl
`7,018,618 B2
`7,223,381 B2
`7,347,199 Bl
`2003/0077230 Al
`2003/0089369 Al
`2003/0157028 Al
`2003/0190287 Al
`2003/0190289 Al
`2003/0206870 Al
`2004/0096399 Al
`2005/0129621 Al
`2005/0142071 Al
`2005/0152846 Al
`2005/0154013 Al
`2005/0220718 Al
`
`4/1999 Cutie
`9/1999 Armer et al.
`9/1999 Jager et al.
`12/1999 Blondino et al.
`12/1999 Marecki
`2/2000 Armer et al.
`4/2000 Jager et al.
`10/2000 Ashurst et al.
`11/2000 Ashurst et al.
`11/2000 Britto
`11/2000 Hochrainer et al.
`6/2001 Saidi et al.
`7/2001 Britto
`9/2001 Blondino et al.
`11/2001 Wu et al.
`7/2002 Goodman et al.
`9/2002 Blondino et al.
`11/2003 Keller et al.
`3/2006 Lewis et al.
`5/2007 Lewis et al.
`3/2008 Lewis et al.
`4/2003 Blondino et al.
`5/2003 Lewis et al.
`8/2003 Lewis et al.
`10/2003 Lewis et al.
`10/2003 Lewis et al.
`11/2003 Lewis et al.
`5/2004 Lewis et al.
`6/2005 Davies et al.
`6/2005 Lewis et al.
`7/2005 Davies et al.
`7/2005 Davies et al.
`10/2005 Lewis et al.
`
`EP
`EP
`EP
`EP
`GB
`GB
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0 372 777
`6/1990
`0 504 112 A2
`9/1992
`0 653 204
`5/1995
`4/1999
`0911048
`9/1978
`1 525 181
`12/1998
`2 326 334
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`H. Bundgaard, et al., "Studies on the Stability of Corticosteroids,"
`Arch. Pharm. Chemi. Sci., Ed. 8, 1980, pp. 995-1014.
`G. Roth, et al., "Degradation Pattern of the Glucocorticoid
`Budesonide in Pharmaceutical Preparations for Topical Use," Proc.
`of the Symp. on the Analysis of Steroids, Eger, Hungary, 1981, pp.
`389-394.
`C. Monder, "Stability of Corticosteroids in Aqueous Solutions,"
`1968, pp. 318-326.
`S.S. Davis, "Physico-Chemical Studies on Aerosol Solutions for
`Drug Delivery I. Water-Propylene Glycol Systems", International
`Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1, 1978, pp. 71-83.
`L. Harris et al., "Twenty-eight-day Double-blind Safety Study of an
`HFA- l 34a Inhalation Aerosol System in Healthy Subjects", J Pham.
`Pharmacol., 1996, vol. 48, pp. 596-600.
`P. Hoet et al.,
`"Epidemic of Liver disease caused by
`hydrochiorofluorocarbons used as ozone-sparing substitutes of
`chlorofluorocarbons", The Lancet,, 1997, vol. 350, pp. 556-559.
`
`(Continued)
`James H. Alstrum-Acevedo
`Primary Examiner -
`Firm -Obion,
`(74) Attorney,
`Agent,
`or
`McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`The invention relates to pressurized metered dose inhalers
`(MDis) in which all or part of the internal surface is stainless
`steel, anodized aluminum, or lined with an inert organic coat(cid:173)
`ing and which contain a formulation which comprises iprat(cid:173)
`ropium bromide.
`21 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Spivak,
`
`Complex Ex. 1008
`
`1
`
`

`

`US 8,142,763 B2
`Page 2
`
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`8/1991
`WO 91/11173
`7 /1992
`WO 92/11236
`11/1992
`WO 92/20391
`4/1993
`WO 93/05765
`6/1993
`W093/11743
`6/1993
`W093/11747
`WO 93/18746
`9/1993
`WO 94/13282
`6/1994
`WO 94/14490
`7 /1994
`WO 94/21228
`9/1994
`WO 94/21229
`9/1994
`6/1995
`95/17195
`WO 95/17195
`6/1995
`WO 98/03533
`1/1996
`WO 96/18384
`6/1996
`WO 96/19198
`6/1996
`WO 96/19968
`7 /1996
`WO 96/19969
`7 /1996
`96/32099
`10/1996
`96/32345
`10/1996
`WO 96/32099
`10/1996
`WO 96/32150
`10/1996
`WO 96/32151
`10/1996
`WO 96/32345
`10/1996
`WO 97/47286
`12/1997
`WO 98/01147
`1/1998
`WO 98/05302
`2/1998
`WO 98/13031
`4/1998
`WO 98/24420
`6/1998
`WO 98/34595
`8/1998
`WO 98/34596
`8/1998
`WO 98/56349
`12/1998
`WO 91/12596
`3/1999
`WO 99/64014
`12/1999
`WO 99/65460
`12/1999
`WO 00/06121
`2/2000
`WO 00/07567
`2/2000
`WO 00/23065
`4/2000
`WO 00/30608
`6/2000
`WO 00/35458
`6/2000
`WO 00/53157
`9/2000
`WO 00/78286
`12/2000
`WO 01/47493
`7/2001
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`J. Daly, Jr., "Properties and toxicology ofCFR alternatives", Aerosol.
`Age. Feb. 1990. pp. 26-27, 40, 56 and 57.
`D. Sirobach, "Alternatives to CFCs" Part II, Aerosol Age, Jul. 1988,
`pp. 32-33, 42 and 43.
`Tsi-Zong Tzou et al., "Drug Form Selection inAlbuterol-Containing
`Metered-Dose Inhaler Formulations and its impact on Chemical and
`Physical Stability", Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1997, vol.
`86, No. 12, pp. 1352-1357.
`M.J. Kontny et al. "Issues Surrounding MDI Formulation Develop(cid:173)
`ment with Non-CFR Propellants", Journal of Aerosol Medicine, vol.
`4, No. 3, pp. 181-187, 1991.
`LP. Tansey, "Changing to CFC-Free Inhalers: The Technical and
`Clinical Challenges", The Pharmaceutical Journal, 1997, vol. 259,
`pp. 896-898.
`D. Tiwari et al, Compatibility Evaluation of Metered-Dose Inhaler
`Valve Elastomers with Teirafluoroethane (P134a), a Non-CFC Pro(cid:173)
`pellant, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 1998, vol. 24,
`No. 4, p. 345-354.
`Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, 3rd Ed., Kibbe Editor, pp.
`7-9, 220-222, 234-235 and 560-561, 1994.
`L.I. Harrison et al., "Pharrnacokinetics and dose Proportionality of
`Beclomethasone From Three Strengths of a CFC-Free
`Beclomethasone
`Dipropionate
`metered-Dose
`Inhaler",
`Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition, 1997, vol. 18, No. 7, pp.
`635-643.
`Chet Leach, "Enhanced Drug Delivery Through reformulating MD Is
`With HFA Propellants-Drug Deposition and its effect on Preclinical
`and Clinical Programs", Respiratory Drug Delivery V, 1996, pp.
`133-144.
`B. Meakin, "Fine Particle Dose Control of Solution Based pMDis",
`Drug Delivery to the Lungs IX, The Aerosol Society, pp. 1-20. (Dec.
`14 & 15, 1998).
`ABPI Compendium of Data Sheets and Summaries of Product Char(cid:173)
`acteristics, Datapham Publications Limited, London, pp. 81-82,
`(1996-97)
`Paul A. Sanders, Ph.D., "Homogeneous Systems and Their Proper(cid:173)
`ties", Handbook of Aerosol Technology, Second Edition, Van
`Nostrand Reinhold Company, NY, p. 30, 1979.
`G. Brambilla et al., "Modulation of Aerosol Clouds Produced by
`HFA Solution Inhalers", Portable Inhalers, pp. 1559-159, (Nov. 26,
`27, 1998).
`R. 0. Williams, III, et al., European Journal of Pharmaceutics and
`Biopharmaceutics, vol. 44, pp. 195-203 (1997).
`
`2
`
`

`

`US 8,142,763 B2
`
`1
`PRESSURIZED METERED DOSE INHALERS
`(MDI) CONTAINING A SOLUTION
`COMPRISING IPRATROPIUM BROMIDE,
`HFA PROPELLANT, AND CO-SOLVENT AND
`COMPRISING A CONTAINER WITH A
`SPECIFIC INTERNAL SURFACE
`COMPOSITION AND/OR LINING
`
`2
`selected medicaments ipratropium bromide is comprised, for
`which many composition examples are supplied, in which the
`active ingredient is in combination with an organic or inor(cid:173)
`ganic acid.
`W096/32099, W096/32150, W096/32151 and W096/
`32345 disclose metered dose inhalers for the administration
`of different active ingredients in suspension in the propellant,
`wherein the internal surfaces of the inhaler are partially or
`completely coated with one or more fluorocarbon polymers
`1 o optionally in combination with one or more non-fluorocarbon
`polymers.
`Said applications do not however address the technical
`problem of the chemical stability of the active ingredient but
`they rather concern a different problem, namely that of the
`15 adhesion of micronized particles of the suspended active
`ingredient to the internal surfaces of the inhaler, such as the
`can walls, valves and sealings. It is also known from Eur. J.
`Pharm. Biopharm. 1997, 44, 195 that suspensions of drugs in
`HFA propellant are frequently subjected to absorption of the
`20 drug particles on the valves and on the internal walls of the
`inhaler. The properties of an epoxy phenol resin coating of the
`aerosol cans have been studied to circumvent this problem.
`WO 95/17195 describes aerosol compositions comprising
`flunisolide, ethanol and HFA propellants. It is stated in the
`25 document that conventional aerosol canisters can be used to
`contain the composition and that certain containers enhance
`its chemical and physical stability. It is suggested that the
`composition can be preferably contained in vials coated with
`resins such as epoxy resins (e.g. epoxy-phenolic resins and
`epoxy-urea-formaldehyde resins).
`Actually the results reported in Tables 5, 6 and 8 respec(cid:173)
`tively on pages 16 and 19 of the cited application demonstrate
`that flunisolide decomposes only in plastic cans (Table 8), and
`that the percent drug recovery in compositions stored in alu(cid:173)
`minium, glass or epoxy-phenol formaldehyde resin coated
`vials is practically the same (Table 8). In other words there is
`no difference between aluminium, glass type III or epoxy/
`phenol-formaldehyde resin coated aluminium vials coated by
`Cebal. No data are reported for other types of epoxy resins.
`It has now been found that the chemical stability problems
`of active ingredients in solution in HFA propellants can be
`eliminated by storing and delivering said composition
`employing metered-dose inhalers having part or all of their
`internal metallic surfaces consisting of stainless steel, ano-
`45 dised aluminium or lined with an inert organic coating.
`The preferred material for the aerosol cans is anodised
`aluminium.
`In the case of epoxy-phenol resin coating the choice of the
`suitable coating will be opportunely made on the basis of the
`50 characteristics of the active ingredient.
`The most widely used epoxy resins in can coatings are
`produced by the reaction of epichlorohydrin and bisphenol A
`(DGEBPA). Variations in the molecular weight and in the
`polymerisation degree result in resins of different properties.
`Phenoxy resins are other commercially important thermo(cid:173)
`plastic polymers derived from bisphenols and epichlorohy(cid:173)
`drin, characterized in that their molecular weights (MW s) are
`higher, i.e., ca 45000, than those of conventional epoxy res(cid:173)
`ins, i.e., 8000 and lack terminal epoxide functionality.
`Other multifunctional resins are epoxy-phenol-novolac
`and epoxy-cresol-novolac resins obtained by glycidylation of
`the phenol-formaldehyde (novolac) or of the o-cresol-form(cid:173)
`aldehyde ( o-cresol novolac) condensates respectively.
`The inhalers according to the invention effectively prevent
`65 the chemical degradation of the active ingredient.
`Surprisingly and contrary to what reported in the prior art
`with regard to flunisolide, we found a considerable degrada-
`
`The invention relates to the use of pressurised metered dose
`inhalers (MDIS) having part or all of their internal surfaces
`consisting of stainless steel, anodised aluminium or lined
`with an inert organic coating. The invention also relates to
`compositions to be delivered with said MDis.
`Pressurised metered dose inhalers are well known devices
`for administering pharmaceutical products to the respiratory
`tract by inhalation.
`Active materials commonly delivered by inhalation
`include bronchodilators such as B22 agonists and anticholin(cid:173)
`ergics, corticosteroids, anti-leukotrienes, anti-allergies and
`other materials that may be efficiently administered by inha(cid:173)
`lation, thus increasing the therapeutic index and reducing side
`effects of the active material.
`MDI uses a propellant to expel droplets containing the
`pharmaceutical product to the respiratory tract as an aerosol.
`For many years the preferred propellants used in aerosols
`for pharmaceutical use have been a group of chlorofluorocar(cid:173)
`bons which are commonly called Freons or CFCs, such as
`CC13 F (Freon 11 or CFC-11), CC12 F2 (Freon 12 or CFC-12),
`and CClF 2----CClF 2 (Freon 114 or CFC-114 ).
`Recently, the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants such 30
`as Freon 11 and Freon 12 have been implicated in the destruc(cid:173)
`tion of the ozone layer and their production is being phased
`out.
`Hydrofluoroalkanes [(HFAs) known also as hydro-fluoro(cid:173)
`carbons (HFCs )] contain no chlorine and are considered less 35
`destructive to ozone and these are proposed as substitutes for
`CFCs.
`HFAs and in particular 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFA
`134a) and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFA 227) have
`been acknowledged to be the best candidates for non-CFC 40
`propellants and a number of medicinal aerosol formulations
`using such HF A propellant systems have been disclosed.
`Many of these applications, in which HFAs are used as
`propellant, propose the addition of one or more of adjuvants
`including compounds acting as co-solvents, surface active
`agents including fluorinated and non-fluorinated surfactants,
`dispersing agents including alkylpolyethoxylates and stabi(cid:173)
`lizers.
`In the international application n°PCT/EP98/03533 filed
`on Oct. 6, 1998 the applicant described solution compositions
`for use in an aerosol inhaler, comprising an active material, a
`propellant containing a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA), a cosol(cid:173)
`vent and further comprising a low volatility component to
`increase the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of
`the aerosol particles on actuation of the inhaler.
`Compositions for aerosol administration via MDis can be
`solutions or suspensions. Solution compositions offer several
`advantages: they are convenient to manufacture being com(cid:173)
`pletely dissolved in the propellant vehicle and obviate physi-
`cal stability problems associated with suspension composi- 60
`tions.
`The widespread use of these formulations is limited by
`their chemical instability, causing the formation of degrada(cid:173)
`tion products.
`W094/13262 proposes the use of acids as stabilisers pre(cid:173)
`venting the chemical degradation of the active ingredient in
`aerosol solution formulations comprising HFAs. Among the
`
`55
`
`3
`
`

`

`US 8,142,763 B2
`
`3
`tion of the tested active ingredients when their formulations
`were stored in glass containers type III.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`Pressurised metered dose inhalers for dispensing solution
`of an active ingredient in a hydrofluorocarbon propellant, a
`co-solvent and optionally a low-volatility component charac(cid:173)
`terized in that part or all of the internal surfaces of said
`inhalers consist of stainless steel, anodised aluminium or are
`lined with an inert organic coating.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`Pressurised metered dose inhalers are known devices, usu(cid:173)
`ally consisting of a main body or can, acting as a reservoir for
`the aerosol formulation, a cap sealing the main body and a
`metering valve fitted in the cap.
`MD Is are usually made of a conventional material such as
`aluminium, tin plate, glass, plastic and the like.
`According to the invention, part or all of the internal sur(cid:173)
`faces of the inhalers consists of stainless steel, anodised alu(cid:173)
`minium or is lined with an inert organic coating. One of the
`preferred coating consists of epoxy-phenol resin. Any kind of
`stainless steel may be used. Suitable epoxy-phenol resins are
`commercially available.
`Active ingredients which may be used in the aerosol com(cid:173)
`positions to be dispensed with the inhalers of the invention are
`any ingredient which can be administered by inhalation and 30
`which meets problems of chemical stability in solution in
`HFA propellants giving rise to a decomposition when stored
`in conventional materials cans and in particular in aluminium
`cans.
`In the compositions to be delivered with the MDis of the
`invention the hydrofluorocarbon propellant is preferably
`selected from the group of HFA 134a, HFA 227 and mixtures
`thereof.
`The co-solvent is usually an alcohol, preferably ethanol.
`The low volatility component, when present, is selected from 40
`the group of glycols, particularly propylene glycol, polyeth(cid:173)
`ylene glycol and glycerol, alkanols such as decanol (decyl
`alcohol), sugar alcohols including sorbitol, mannitol, lactitol
`and maltitol, glycofural (tetrahydro-furfurylalcohol) and
`dipropylene glycol, vegetable oils, organic acids for example
`saturated carboxylic acids including !auric acid, myristic acid
`and stearic acid; unsaturated carboxylic acids including sor(cid:173)
`bic acid, and especially oleic acid; saccharine, ascorbic acid,
`cyclamic acid, amino acids, or aspartame, esters for example
`ascorbyl palmitate, isopropyl myristate and tocopherol
`esters; alkanes for example dodecane and octadecane; terpe(cid:173)
`nes for example menthol, eucalyptol, limonene; sugars for
`example lactose, glucose, sucrose; polysaccharides for
`example ethyl cellulose, dextran; antioxidants for example
`butylated hydroxytoluene, butylated hydroxyanisole; poly- 55
`meric materials for example polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl
`acetate, polyvinyl pyrrolidone; amines for example ethano(cid:173)
`lamine, diethanolamine,
`triethanolamine;
`steroids
`for
`example cholesterol, cholesterol esters. The low-volatility
`component has a vapour pressure at 25° C. lower than 0.1 kPa, 60
`preferably lower than 0.05 kPa.
`The aerosols compositions to be delivered with the pres(cid:173)
`surised MD Is of the invention may contain from 0.2 to 2% by
`weight of said low volatility component.
`Propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, isopropyl myristate 65
`and glycerol are particularly preferred low-volatility compo-
`nents.
`
`4
`The function of the low volatility component is to modulate
`the MMAD of the aerosol particles. Being used at very low
`concentrations, it does not substantially affect the chemical
`stability of the compositions.
`Examples of active ingredients include: anticholinergics
`such as ipratropium bromide, oxitropium bromide, tiotro(cid:173)
`pium bromide; acetal corticosteroids such as budesonide,
`ciclesonide, rofleponide; chetal corticosteroids such as
`flunisolide, triamcinolone acetonide; other corticosteroids
`10 such as fluticasone propionate, mometasone furoate; short or
`long acting beta-adrenergic agonists such as salbutamol, for(cid:173)
`moterol, salmeterol, TA 2005 and their combinations. The
`active ingredients when possible may be present in racemic
`15 mixtures or in form of a single enantiomer or epimer.
`As said before, WO 94/13262 teaches that problems of
`chemical stability of medicaments and in particular of iprat(cid:173)
`ropium bromide in aerosol solution compositions can be
`solved adding an acid, either an inorganic acid or an organic
`20 acid, to the HFA propellant/cosolvent system.
`Examples of compositions containing ipratropium bro(cid:173)
`mide in HFA 134a/ethanol systems further containing an
`inorganic acid such as hydrochloric, nitric, phosphoric or
`sulfuric acid or an organic acid such as ascorbic or citric acid
`25 are provided.
`We found that in solution compositions comprising iprat(cid:173)
`ropium bromide, a propellant containing a hydrofluoroal(cid:173)
`kane, a cosolvent and further comprising a low volatility
`component:
`a) different decomposition rates occur with different acids:
`for example we found that ipratropium bromide (20 µg/dose)
`in a composition of13% (w/w) ethanol, 1.0% (w/w) glycerol,
`20 µI/can oflN hydrochloric acid and HFA 134a to 12 ml/can
`35 rapidly decomposes and after 3 months storage at 40° C. gives
`85.0% average of drug remaining;
`b) ipratropium bromide with or without acids is stable in
`stainless steel, anodised aluminium or in some types of epoxy
`phenol resin lined cans;
`c) surprisingly certain kinds of materials, such as glass,
`coatings proposed in the prior-art to overcome the physical
`absorption phenomenon of the active ingredient, such as per(cid:173)
`fluoroalkoxyalkanes
`and
`fluorinated-ethylene-propylene
`polyether sulfone resins, or certain kinds of epoxy phenol
`45 coatings turned out to be completely unsatisfactory and inef(cid:173)
`fective in preventing its chemical degradation.
`Another preferred active ingredient for the preparation of
`solution compositions in a HFA/cosolvent system to be dis(cid:173)
`pensed by MD Is according to the present invention is budes-
`50 onide.
`Previously HFA/budesonide compositions have been
`described, in which budesonide is present in suspension in the
`propellant system and the composition further comprises
`additional ingredients such as particular kinds of surfactants
`(EP 504112, WO 93/05765, WO 93/18746, WO 94/21229).
`In WO 98/13031 it is reported that suspension formulations
`ofbudesonide have a propensity to rapidly form coarse floes
`upon dispersion and redispersion which may deleteriously
`affect dosage reproducibility. There is also a tendency for
`budesonide to deposit from suspension onto the walls of the
`container.
`To achieve stable suspensions of particulate budesonide it
`is employed in the prior art a composition containing a mix(cid:173)
`ture of HF A propellants to match the density of the propellant
`mixture to be substantially identical to the density ofbudes(cid:173)
`onide, up to 3% of an adjuvant such as ethanol and small
`amounts of surfactant.
`
`4
`
`

`

`US 8,142,763 B2
`
`6
`HFA 134a to 12 ml/can were distributed in stainless steel,
`anodised aluminium, standard aluminium, glass cans or in
`cans having different internal coatings and were stored at
`various conditions.
`The results are reported in Table 4 and 5.
`The percent drug remaining in the compositions, measured
`by HPLC, shows the favourable effect of stainless steel, ano(cid:173)
`dised aluminium and inert coating on the chemical stability of
`the active ingredient in respect to standard aluminium or glass
`cans. The best results have been obtained with stainless steel,
`anodised aluminium cans and with epoxy-phenol or perfluo(cid:173)
`roalkoxyalkane coatings.
`
`Example 4
`
`A composition containing 48 mg of dexbudesonide (200
`µg/dose), 15% (w/w) ethanol, 1.3% (w/w) glycerol in HFA
`134a to 12 ml can was distributed in epoxy-phenol lacquered
`aluminium cans and was stored at 40° C.
`The percent drug remaining in the composition after 8
`months, measured by HPLC, was 95.4% (average value
`referred to two tests).
`The control of the epimeric distribution showed that there
`is no transfer from the 22R to the 22S epimer.
`
`Example 5
`
`10
`
`5
`It is stated in the document that the levels of the adjuvants
`are low to avoid significant solubilization of drug, leading to
`a problem of chemical degradation and particle size increase
`on storage.
`In the solution compositions of the present invention 5
`budesonide is chemically and physically stable.
`The aerosol compositions of the invention distributed in
`inhalers having the internal surfaces consisting of stainless
`steel, anodised aluminium or coated with an inert material
`and preferably with epoxy-phenol resin are stable for long
`periods and do not undergo chemical degradation.
`Also in this case a considerable degradation of the active
`ingredient was noticed when glass containers were used.
`Analogously flunisolide and dexbudesonide (the 22R(cid:173)
`epimer ofbudesonide) solutions in HFA propellant contain(cid:173)
`ing ethanol and a low-volatility component are stable when 15
`stored in inhalers having the internal surfaces consisting of
`anodised aluminium or coated with epoxy-phenol resin. Evi(cid:173)
`dent degradation offlunisolide was noticed when glass con(cid:173)
`tainers were used.
`It has been also found that the low volatility component 20
`may also act as a co-solvent, thus increasing the solubility of
`the drug in the formulation and increasing the physical sta(cid:173)
`bility and/or allowing the possibility to decrease the quantity
`of co-solvent required.
`The following examples further illustrate the invention. In 25
`the examples and tables the different types of epoxy phenol
`resins are indicated with numbers in brackets corresponding
`to:
`(1) Epoxy-phenol lacquered aluminium vials coated by
`Cebal
`(2) Epoxy-phenol lacquered aluminium vials coated by
`Presspart
`(3) Epoxy-phenol lacquered aluminium vials coated by
`Nussbaum & Guhl
`(4) Epoxy-phenol lacquered aluminium vials coated by 35
`Presspart, other than (2)
`
`Example 1
`
`Compositions containing 7.2, 12, 16.8 mg of dexbudes-
`30 onide ( corresponding to 30, 50 and 70 µg/dose respectively),
`ethanol, 0.9 (w/w) PEG 400 or isopropyl myristate (IPM) in
`HFA 227 to 12 ml can was distributed in aluminium anodised
`cans and was stored 70 days at 50° C. The results are reported
`in Table 6.
`The percent drug remaining in the composition measured
`by HPLC shows the favourable effect of anodised aluminium
`cans on the chemical stability of the active ingredient. The
`control of the epimeric distribution showed that there is no
`transfer from the 22R to the 22S epimer.
`
`40
`
`A composition containing 4.8 mg of ipratropium bromide
`(20 µg/dose), 13% (w/w) ethanol, 1.0% (w/w) glycerol and
`HFA 134a to 12 ml/can was distributed in stainless steel,
`anodised aluminium, standard aluminium cans or in cans
`having different internal coatings and were stored at various
`conditions.
`The results are reported in Table 1 and Table 2.
`The percent drug remaining in the composition, measured
`by HPLC, shows that stainless steel and anodised aluminium
`cans as well as epoxy-phenol resins (1 ), (2) and ( 4) coated
`cans are effective in preventing the chemical degradation of 50
`ipratropium bromide, differently from glass cans or other
`tested coatings.
`
`Example 6
`
`The fine particle dose (FPD: weight of particles having an
`45 aerodynamic diameter lower than 4.7 µm) of dexbudesonide
`solution compositions in HFA 134a or HFA 227, prepared
`following the examples 4 and 5, was determined.
`The experiments were performed using the Andersen Cas(cid:173)
`cade Impactor and the data obtained are average values from
`10 shots.
`The results, reported in Table 7 and 8 show that dexbudes(cid:173)
`onide formulations of the invention are characterized by a
`very low dose and a very high fine particle dose.
`The FPD gives a direct measure of the mass of particles
`55 within the specified size range and is closely related to the
`efficacy of the product.
`
`Example 2
`
`The effect of different acids on the chemical stability of the
`composition of Example 1 was studied.
`Citric, ascorbic and hydrochloric acids were added to the
`formulations in the amounts reported in Table 3.
`The stability of the compositions was tested after 1, 2 and 60
`5 months storage at 40° C. in epoxy-phenol resin ( 4) coated
`cans.
`
`Example 3
`
`Compositions containing 12 mg of budesonide (50
`µg/dose), 13% or 15% (w/w) ethanol, 1.3% (w/w) glycerol in
`
`65
`
`Example 7
`
`A compos1t10n containing 60 mg of flunisolide (250
`µg/dose), 15% (w/w) ethanol, 1% (w/w) glycerol in HFA
`134a to 12 ml/can was distributed in anodised aluminium,
`glass cans or in cans having different internal coatings and
`were stored for 41 days at 50° C.
`The results are reported in Table 9.
`The percent drug remaining in the composition, measured
`by HPLC, shows the favourable effect of anodised aluminium
`
`5
`
`

`

`US 8,142,763 B2
`
`7
`and inert coating with epoxy-phenol resins on the chemical
`stability of the active ingredient in respect to glass cans.
`
`Example 8
`
`8
`TABLE 2-continued
`
`Percent ipratropium bromide (IPBr)
`recovered after storing the composition of
`Example 1 for 30 and 60 days at 50° C., or
`for 96 days at 40° C. in cans of different
`types (average values referred to two tests).
`
`% RESIDUAL IPBr
`(% RESIDUAL IPBr RELATIVE TO t ~ 0)
`
`CAN TYPE
`
`Epoxy phenol resin
`(2)
`Epoxy phenol resin
`(3)
`Anodised aluminum
`
`t~o
`
`97.5
`
`98.5
`
`94
`
`Glass type III*
`
`t ~ 30 days
`at50° C.
`
`t ~ 60 days
`at 50° C.
`
`t ~ 96 days
`at 40° C.
`
`90
`(92)
`56.5
`(57.5)
`89
`(95)
`48.5
`(-)
`
`88.5
`(90.5)
`46
`(47)
`87
`(92.5)
`41.5
`(-)
`
`89
`(91)
`52.5
`(53.5)
`90.5
`(96.5)
`47
`(-)
`
`*according to Eur Pharmacopoeia yd Ed Suppl 1999
`
`TABLE3
`
`Percent ipratropium bromide (IPBr)
`recovered after storing the compositions
`of Example 1, witb different acids added,
`in epoxy-phenol (4) coated cans
`(average values referred to two tests)
`
`10
`
`15
`
`The solubility of ipratropium bromide and micronized
`budesonide in ethanol, glycerol and their mixtures has been
`investigated.
`The tests were carried out at room temperature.
`a) Solubility in Ethanol.
`About 8.5 g of absolute ethanol were weighed into a flask.
`The active ingredient (Ipratropium Bromide or Budesonide)
`was added in small amounts, under magnetic stirrer, until no
`further dissolution occurred (i.e.: a saturated solution was
`obtained). The flask was stirred for about 40 minutes, and left
`to settle overnight prior to analysis, to let the system equili(cid:173)
`brate. The flask was kept sealed, to avoid evaporation.
`The solution obtained was then filtered and tested for the
`amount of active ingredient, according to the conventional
`analytical procedure.
`b) Solubility in Ethanol/Glycerol Mixtures.
`The required amounts of ethanol and glycerol were
`weighted into a flask, and mixed by a magnetic stirrer until a
`homogeneous phase was obtained.
`The solubility of ipratropium bromide in ethanol is 42.48 25
`mg/g.
`The solubility data of ipratropium bromide in ethanol/
`glycerol mixtures are listed in Table 10.
`The solubility of micronized budesonide in ethanol is
`31.756 mg/g.
`Solubility data ofmicronized budesonide in ethanol/glyc(cid:173)
`erol mixtures are listed in Table 11.
`The data show that both the tested active ingredients are
`rather soluble in ethanol, and that their solubility increases
`even when small percentages of glycerol are added.
`The increase in solubility is maintained also in presence of
`HFA propellants.
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`TABLE 1
`
`40
`
`Percent ipratropium bromide (IPBr) recovered
`after storing tbe composition of Example 1
`for 8 montbs at 40° C. in cans of different
`es
`
`CAN TYPE
`
`% RESIDUAL IPBr
`
`45
`
`Epoxy-phenol resin (4)
`Perfluoroalkoxyalkane
`Fluorinated-etbylene-propylene/
`polyetber sulphone (Xylan 8840(R))
`Stainless steel
`Standard aluminium
`
`96
`57
`78
`
`96
`46
`
`TABLE2
`
`Percent ipratropium bromide (IPBr)
`recovered after storing the composition of
`Example 1 for 30 and 60 days at 50° C., or
`for 96 days at 40° C. in cans of different
`types (average values referred to two tests).
`
`Acid
`
`Citric
`
`(0.6%w/w)
`
`(0.3%w/w)
`
`(0.07%w/w)
`
`98
`
`99
`
`99
`
`Ascorbic
`
`119
`
`Hydrochloric
`
`(4µ1-1 N)
`
`(10µ1-1 N)
`
`(20 µ1-1 N)
`
`50
`
`None
`
`101
`
`101
`
`100
`
`97
`
`% RESIDUAL IPBr
`(% RESIDUAL IPBr RELATNE TO t ~ 0)
`
`t ~ 1 montb
`at 40° C.
`
`t ~ 2 montbs
`at40° C.
`
`t ~ 5 montbs
`at40° C.
`
`98
`(100)
`99
`(100)
`98
`(99)
`113
`(95)
`
`100
`(99)
`98
`(97)
`95
`(95)
`97
`(100)
`
`99
`(101)
`100
`(101)
`99
`(100)
`112
`(94)
`
`104
`(102)
`98
`(97)
`98
`(98)
`98

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket