throbber
WO 93/18752
`
`9
`
`PCT/ US93/02800
`
`components include lecithin? MO.HTANOL-68f EPICURON 120
`{Lucas Meyer, Germaay) which is a mixture of about 70% of
`phosphatiaylcholiite, 12% phosphatidylethaholajnine and
`about 15% othar phospholipids; OVOTHIH 160 (Lucas Meyer,
`S Germany) which is a mixtare comprising about 60%
`phosphatidylcholine, 18% phosphatidylethanolaaine and 12%
`other phospholipids; a purified phospholipid snijcture;
`LIPOID E-75 or LIPOID E~S0 (Lipoid, Germany) which is a
`phospholipid liixtttire comprising about 86%:
`10 phosphatidylcholine, 8% phosphatidylethanolamins, 3.S%
`ttoi3*-polar lipids and about 2% sphingomy el in. Purified egg
`yolk phospholipidsj soybean oil phosphoiipids or other
`purified phospholipid siKtures are ussful as this
`component. This listing is representative and not
`15 limiting, as other phospholipid materials which are known
`to those skilled in the art can be ttssd.
`The surfactant chosen should preferably be non-ionic
`to minimize irritation, and one skilled in the art can
`conduct tests to routinely select specific surfactants for
`20 this purpose. Generally^ the surfactant is a non-ionic
`alkylene oxide conisnsate of an organic compound which
`contains one or moti hydroxyI groups, for example,
`ethoxylated and/or propoxylated alcohol or ester compounds
`or mixtures thereof are commonly available and are well
`25 known to those •skilled in the art, Suitable surfactants
`include? bat are not limited to, T^LOXAPOL; P0L0XM1ER
`4070? mwxmm isa/ PGLYOXYL 40 Stearate? EMOLFOR EL~620,
`PGLfSORBATE 80, and POLYSORBATE 20, as well as various
`compounds sold under the trade name TWEES (IC1 American
`30 inc., Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.A,}, PLmmtC F-SS (trade
`name of BASF, Ludvigshafen, Germany for a copolymer of
`poiyoxyethy 1 erse and poiyoxypropylene}. At this time,
`PLUROSIC F-~68 and the POLOXAMSR 1S8 are preferred. The
`TYLOXAPOL and TWEEN surfactants are also preferred because
`JS they are PDA approved for human use.
`The aqueous component will be the continuous phase of
`the emulsion and may be water, saline or any other
`
`0228
`
` EXHIBIT 1004 (Part 2 of 5)
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`- 10 ~
`
`PCr/US93/0280fi
`
`suitable aqueoiis solation which .can yielsi an isotetiic and
`pH controlled preparation.
`In addition, the compositions of the invention may
`also comprise conventional additives such as preservatives
`$ and antioxidants. Topical preservatives include
`Thisierosai, chlorbutanol, and methyl, ethyl, propyl or
`butyl parabans - The preferred oil phase antioxidant is
`a-tocopherol or ^-tocopherol succinate. The aqueous phase
`my also include an antioxidant or a chelating agent of a
`10 polyamine carboxyliq acid such as ethylene diamine
`tetraacetic acid ("SDTA"), or a pharmaceutically
`acceptable salt thereof,
`The drug, cosmetic, or active ingredient, alone or
`with the oily excipients, are sjixed with a sufficient
`IS amount of surfactants and/or dispersing and suspending
`agents to allow dispersibility within the desired size
`range in aqueous medium. The surfactant(s) may be any
`pharmaceutically acceptable one{s5 that enable(s) adequate
`dispersibility and stability of IShe droplets In aqueous
`20 medium, in a form of stable sutoroicron si£e~range droplets.
`The drug, with or without oily excipients, is vigorously
`mixed with an aqueous solution that may contain
`surfactants, to result in submicron droplets of the drug
`and excipients. if needed, a high shear mixer and a high
`25 pressure hoRiogeniser are eaplaved to achieve the desired
`droplet size. Sonication is an alternative method to
`achieve the desired submicron droplet size,
`Highly efficient delivery of the submicron droplets
`to the skin Is obtained with a dosage form which is semi-*
`30 solid. To produce a semi-solid composition, many methods
`may be applied; addition of gelling agents, such as
`carbopols and adjusting to a pH, organic thickening agents
`such as polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVPJ or a hydroxypropyl
`methyl cellulose (HPMC) poller, or cetostearyl alcohol
`35 and other waxes that may rigidify, solidify or increase
`the viscosity of the aqueous dispersion to the desired
`consistency level, inorganic thickening agents such as
`
`0229
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`« 11
`
`PCT/i!S93/(J28(H>
`
`18
`
`is
`
`20
`
`fased silica {AEROSIL or CMOSIL)alaaifta
`clay or other
`sijnilar eolloidal particles can be used to iacrfease
`viscosity of the formuiatidn. It is also possible to use
`oil concentrations on the higher end of the disclosed
`S range to achieve higher viscosity cosspositions. However.,
`use of greater than 30% oil causes difficulty in achieving
`the desired siroplet size.
`Che&sicaX skin penetration enliancers jnay £>&
`incorporated into the formulation to enhance penetration
`In this
`of the active ingredient through the skin.
`decyl methyl sulfoxide, N-dodecyl
`regard, DMSO
`pyrrolidone, dscanoi, dod&cancl, an orfanic acid such as
`oleic acid, or the like can be used, overall
`pharmaco1ogica1 effects achieved with the combination of
`chemical enhancers and sutanicrcn droplets are greater than
`for either coatponent used by itself.
`This invention provides submioron spheres (or
`droplets) that are an insoluble assembly of unique
`entities dispersed in an aqueous phase with the aid of
`appropriate surfactants or emulsifying agents. The
`emulsifying agent and surfactant form a protective layer
`around the droplets thus enabling efficient dispersion and
`suspension of the oily phase in water. This layer is a
`monolayer, polar by virtue of the surfactants. The
`present .droplets- are neither vesicles nor liposomes since
`no biiayers resembling the biiayer forroing the living cell
`wall is formed. Micelles may be formed and be present,
`but ®ay account for only a very small fraction of the
`surfactants and insoluble aatter of the formula and in
`nsgligibXe quantities, usually lass than about 1% of the
`total mass of insoluble matter and surfactants or
`dispersing agents.
`Experiments carried out and measurements by means of
`photon oorreiation spectroscopy (Coulter N4MD) and laser
`diffraction (Coulter LS13G) indicated that the droplet
`size in the compositions of the invention is in the size
`range of about 0«02 to about 0,5. microns. Preferably, the
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`0230
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`12
`
`PCT/US'B/OISOO
`
`size rang® is mainly in the 0.1 to 0-3 micron (i.e., 1Q0
`to 300 nia) range.
`Depending sn the inherent activity of the active
`incfrediftRt its quantity has to be a&jasted: £or each
`5 specific drug.
`Compositions according to the invention for topical
`application to obtain a topical or s^steBiio effect,
`contain, for example as active ingredient: steroids or
`non-steroidal anti~inflasmiatory drugs, antiisiotxcs,
`3.0 antifungals, antivirals, antihistaMnes, antineoplastics
`or local anesthetics. Specific examples would include
`s«festances such as clotrimazole, bifonazole, tetracyclirie
`miconazole, triamcinolone, amphotericin gentajjiicin,
`hydrocortisone, iodaxuridine, diphenhydramine, minoKMil,
`IS lidocaine, tetracaine and clindamycin.
`For systamic effects, the following categories of
`drugs are suitable: hypnotics, sedatives, aMxlolyfcics,
`antideprassanfes, anticonvulsants, anti-inflaMaatory arugs,
`anti-fungals, prostanoids, prostanoid agonists, prostanoid
`20 antagonists, analgesics, hormones and vitamins. Specific
`examples would include lipophilic peptides# barbiturates,
`benzodiazepines, phenothiazines, cyclosporin,
`diphenoxylate, physatigmine, tacrine, diclofenac,
`dexaiaethasone, prostaglandins, nifedipine, nitroglycerine,
`25 atropine, verapamil, fentanyl, lipophilic peptides,
`ketotif en, phenytoin, miconaKOle and Jcetoconaaole.
`For cosmetic effects, the active ingredient might be
`for example Vitamih A, Vitamin E, a polyunsaturated fatty
`acid such as ei.cosapentanoic acid, retinoids, carotenes
`30 aM ben 2oy 1 peroxide.
`Instead of a viscous composition, the droplets of the
`invention can be topically and transdermally applied by an
`article which includes the droplets, an active ingredient
`and a support for retaining the composition thereon. The
`35 support Would" include an adhesive for securing the article
`to the skin of a subject. A wide variety of active
`ingredients, including steroids such as estradiol,
`
`0231
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`- 13 -
`
`PCr/US93/9»
`
`nicotine or nitroglycerine, can be administered by this
`article, which would generally foe In the forja of an
`occlusive dressing or an adhesive patch-
`In the following description, concentrations will be
`5 indicated by % which denotes the concentration by weight
`of the component per 100 units volume of entire
`compositiGn* All indicated concentrations should be
`understood as standing each toy itself, and not cumulative.
`It should be appreciated by the artisan, however, that
`there is sojne dependency between the concentrations of the
`coroponeiyts, e.g., higher concentrations of the oil will
`
`10
`
`is
`
`20
`
`25
`
`36
`
`35
`
`and surfactant-
`The emulsion used in the compositions of the present
`invention^ may comprise about 0.5 to 30% oil, about 0.1 to
`10% eniulsifier and about 0,05 to 5% surfactants.
`Genera1ly, increasing the concentration of the non-aqueous
`phase, i.e., the combined concentration of the oily and
`the am&hiphilic phase, increases viscosity of the
`composition, In order to obtain a viscous composition,
`the concentration of the oil could be increased to about
`20 to 30%. M noted above, another way to increase the
`viscosity is to add a pharmaceuticalIy acceptable gelling
`or thickening agent, such as Carfoopol or the like. These
`viscous compositions are useful as creams or ointroents.
`preferred concentrations of the components are as
`follows; afeput ,5 to 201 oil; about 0.2 to s% of the
`esjulsifier, with about 0.2 to 1% being particularly
`preferred; and about 0.2 to 5% for the surfactant, with
`about 0.2 to 1% feeing particularly preferred. For a
`viscous coiaposition, about 0,2 to 15% of the gelling or
`thickening agent can be included.
`The drug or cosmetic agent (the active ingredient) is
`present in an amount of about 0,05 to 5% by weight of the
`composition, preferably about o.i to 2.5%, Depending upon
`Whether the active ingredient is hydrophilic or
`hydrophobic, it will be physicaily present in the oily
`
`0232
`
`

`
`^0:'93/t8752
`
`^ 14
`
`rwmm/mm
`
`phase or the aqueous component, Msb, the pH of these
`coiRpasitions should b& in a ra^ge which is suitable for
`the stability of the active ingredient, but slightly
`acidic or as close to netitxal as possible for
`5 cosipatibxliry with the skin.
`Uhe invention is illustrateci with reference to the
`above-raent ioned examples r which are to be construed in a
`strictly non~ 1 iirdtati.ve manner.
`
`y:-
`
`10
`
`The enhanced topical and transdermal effects of drugs
`adsiinistered in emlsions comprised of submicroxi size
`droplets in comparison to standard cream formulations and
`cojBHjercial preparations was estatolished in several test
`15 systems,
`Antiinflammatory agents were tested utiliging
`the carrageenan induced paw edema in guinea pigsx
`Tranquilizers were assessed in guinea pigs utilizing
`behavioral, tests indicative of sedation. Local
`anesthetiGs were tested in healthy human volunteers on the
`basis of loss of local sensation following application of
`various freparations:.
`The following sumiaarises the systeals used and results
`obtained with the formulations tested* The following
`cases are to be construed as examples in a strictly non-
`limitative fanner.
`
`ao
`
`25
`
`SXMPI.E it A diazepam submicron cream prssparation was
`macie -as fQllows: 0.S g of diazepaai are mixed with 9 q of
`jnediuju chain triglyceride {MCf.} oil and 1 g of lecithih
`until an homogeneous oily phase is achieved. The oily
`phase is then dispersed into 90 al of an aqueous phase
`•Which includes 2 g of PLURONIC F-6S and 0,1 g of a mixture
`of jnethy 1 and propyl parabens by initial mixing with a
`magnetic stirrer followed by a high shear mixer {Polytroh
`K30QQ} for 5 Hiinutes at ao^ooo mm to form an emulsion-
`Farther treatment of the emuisioh is conducted in a high
`pressure homogenisar {APV - C-aulin) at 800 bar for 6
`
`3.0'
`
`'3'S
`
`0233
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`IS
`
`PCr/US<B/028Oft
`
`minutes (about 10 cycles) at 45-55"C. Thereafter* the
`emulsion was cooled to room temjoeratiire and the aiean
`droplet size was measured size to be 120 nanometers having
`a very narrow distribution with practically no droplets
`S above one micron (lass than 0.5%) being detected.
`CARBOPOL is added to a final concentration of 0.3%,
`Finally, the pH is elevated with sodiu® hydroxide to ? and
`a seBi-solid submicron droplet preparation is achieved.
`
`10 EXAMPLE 2 i
`Example 1 was repeated using 6 g MCT oil and
`The mean droplet size was found to be 150
`3 g oleic acid-
`nanometers.
`
`3,5
`
`EXAMPLE 3: •{Comparative) A formulation was made in the
`same manner as Example 2 but without the procedure to
`reduce the droplet size. The £inal-.droplet size was
`between 5 and 50 microns.
`
`{Coisparative) A conventional diazepam crsaat
`was prepared as follows: diazepam 0,5 g, MCT oil 9 q,
`emulsifying wax 9 g, hot water 81 si, A classical
`technique was used whereby the wax was iselted, the oil and
`drug were added, and then the hot water was added with
`vigorous stirring» The mean droplet sise of the cream was
`between S and 50 microns.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`SXMIPLE 5 ;
`The systeitiic tranguili^ing effect of topically
`applied diazepam Greams of the first four examples ware
`investigated and compared to the systemic administratiGn
`SO of diaaapam, as follows.
`Materials and Methods
`Guinea pigs, wales, and females, having a body weight
`of about 250 g wero shaved 24 hours before appliaation of
`the creams. The following formulations were applied;
`35 (a) diazepam 0.5% - small drops (Example 1}; (b) diazepam
`0xS% - small drops with oleic acid (Example 2);
`
`0234
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`16 -
`
`PO7US93/O28O0
`
`10
`
`IB
`
`(c) diaaepas 0.5% - large drops with oleic acid (Ejeasple
`(d) diaaepa® 0.5% in a convantianal cream of larg-®
`3K?
`five graias of each preparation
`droplet size. {Example 4)..
`was applied on the shaved area, i.e., about 20 c% of each
`5 gmnss pig.
`CoEteiercially availafeie par©nt«raX preparations wers
`also used as controls, as follows.(e) diaaepam 5 ucf/ml
`{vials of 2 ml), 10 ag/fcg administered intra»tiscularly#
`a.nd (f) the same preparation administered subcutaneously
`(10 sg/Jcg).
`Clinical appearance, following application or
`The onset and
`injection, was checked and recorded,
`tsrs-iination times of the effects were recorded.
`Three basic behavioral tests, indicating level of
`sedationf were used
`Eighting reflejc: animals are positioned on their back
`(a)
`and. the time that is required to return to normal position
`Three levels of sedation are scored; low
`was recorded.
`(score 1) - animal returns iramedlately to normal position;
`moderate, (score 2) - up to 30 seconds are needed to return
`to normal position; severe-deep (score 3} ~ more than 30
`seconds are needed to regain normal position.
`Step test: animals are positioned on a S cm high
`m
`step, with the forelegs on the step,
`The time interval
`for changing- this position was measured for each animal.
`The sa»e course of time that was used for scoring of
`righting reflex was used here.
`Animals were positioned on their hind legs, their
`(c)
`The
`forelegs put on the top of their cage (20 cm high)-
`time interval for changing this position was measured for
`The same scoring methodology as above was
`each animal.
`used here.
`m
`k total aggregate score for each animal was
`calculated to show the state of sedation for this study.
`The results are shown in Table 1. It was found that
`topically applied diazepam is very effective when
`delivered in submicron droplets, A systsmic-like effect
`
`20
`
`25
`
`38
`
`35
`
`0235
`
`

`
`Bffica<sy of Differeat ©Epical aod Systemic
`DiazepaK Poraulstioas ia Guiaea Pigs,
`score Time of
`So, Sf
`Animals
`Activity
`froin)
`1S-120
`15-120
`45-240
`30-120
`
`j{|
`
`4
`
`39.0
`52.8
`47.5
`43.7
`
`WOMIS752
`
`- I? -
`
`PCT/USSB/0280ft
`
`my 'be achieved with tihis preparation.t but the same dos®
`in large droplet foxrmiiiation was not effective,. Also, the:
`inclusion of oleic acid in the formulation reduces the
`time for onset, of activity and duration.
`

`
`table 4;
`
`T:E'®atmsnt:
`
`10 Siizepam, i,®,., 10 iftg/kg
`Siaseg'Sm,
`/ 10 mg/.kg
`Diazepam O-S'*, crea.'ts fS g)
`$ujs»tcror5 drops
`Diazepam O.S% cream (5 g)
`subrrii.cron drops with oleic
`acid
`Diazepam 0.5% crease (S g)
`large drops with oleic acid
`Classical diasepam Q.2%
`cream (S g)
`EXAMPLE 6: iEJcaaiisle 1 was repeated using TWSEN-S0 instead
`of PLURORIC :F-68. The sean droplet, size was I?G
`nanometers and an enhanced tranquili^ing effect
`substantially equivalent to that of Example l was
`deteGted.
`Example i was repeated using EMULFDR EL-620
`mmhz ?-
`The mean droplet size was: found
`instead of PLURONIp F-68.
`to be 100 nanometers and the activity was eomparafele to
`that of Example i>
`30 EXAMPLE 8: Example 1 was again repeated except that the
`formilation contained 20 g MCT oil. Tile mean droplet size
`was found to be 210 nanometers, but the activity was
`significantly increased in coiftparison to CGissparative
`Example 4 ansa was as good as that of Example 1*
`
`3.0
`
`5
`
`C'
`
`IS
`
`2 0
`
`25
`
`35
`
`0236
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`^ i s
`
`PCr/l.!S93/02806
`
`EX&MgliE 9: Example 1 was repeated except that 20 g HOT
`oil and I g diazepams ware used, tee mean droplet size was
`250 nanometers and the preparation exhibited increased
`activity compared to that of Comparative ExaiapM 4 which
`s was at least as good as that of Example 1.
`
`EXAMPLE 101 Exaapis 1 was agairt defeated but l g oleic
`acid was includad, Tfee ssean droplet size, was 100
`nanometers and this compositioti Was found to foe as active
`1© as that of Example 1.
`
`EXAMPLE in Example i was repeated using TWEEN-65 instead
`of leeithiiu The aean droplet size was found to toe 250
`nanometers and the fariisulatiors was much sore active (a
`IS scors of 35} than that of Example 4.
`
`EXAMPLE 12; Exaapie 1 was repeated using MOHTANOL-68
`instead of lecjithin. The mean droplet size was found to
`be 300 nanometers and the formulation was much more active
`(a score of 30} than that of Example 4.
`
`ExaMipie 1 was repeated using soybean oil
`EKAMPLE 13;
`The mean droplet size was found to foe
`instead of KCT oil.
`ISO nanometers and the formulatiors was as active as that
`of Example 1 (a score of 45),
`
`28
`
`as
`
`EmMPLB 14;
`Example l was repeated with the addition of
`a-tocopherol as an antioxidant. The ciean droplet size was
`found to be ISO nanometers and the forimilation was as
`30 active as that of Example i„ This formulation was also
`found to b& suitable for administeriftg oxidation sensitive
`drugs such as nifedipine-
`EXAMPLES 15-16: ExaiB.ple i was again repeated but 2 g of
`35 AERO SIX. silica and hydroxy-propyl cellulose, respectively,
`were included instead of CARBOPQL, and the pH was adjusted
`to 5,5. The aean droplet size for each example was found
`
`0237
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`T ; b ; w
`*7
`
`vmwmmm
`
`to he, ISO nanometers and the compositions were found to be
`as active as that of Exaasple 1.
`
`An indosnethacin subalcron cream preparation
`5 was stacJe a followsx Indoaethacin 0,5 g, MCT oil l?
`lecithin 0.8 g, EMULFOR EL-620 1,6 g, CARBOPOL 1.7 q and
`water ?S sii. The procedure of Example 1 was followed to
`obtain a mean droplet size of 130 nanometers.
`
`10 EXAMPLE ISi {Comparative} A conventional, large droplet
`size indo^ethacin crearo was prepared as follows:
`inaomsthacin 0,5 <?, MCT oil 15 gf emulsifying pax 9 q,
`water 75 mi. The composition was prepared as in Exajspie
`2< The jsean droplet size was found to be hetw&eri 5-50 }m*
`
`IB
`
`'EXRSGPLE.' 19: The topical anti-iriX iaisiaatory effect of
`topically "-applied indomethacin creass of Examples
`17-i8 were investigated and compared for their atvti-
`inflasuaatory effect versus systwic adaiinistratian^
`20 Animals and Materials
`(a) Guinea pigs (250 g),
`(b) Indosiethacin 0.5% in submicron orearo (Bxample 17) >
`(c) indoHiethacin 0.5% in conventional creasa CExample IS}.
`(d) Indoroethacin 0.5% in solution.
`2S Study Procedure
`(a; All animals received an injection of 0.1 ml
`carrageenan 0.1% into the hind paw, Measurements were
`taken froia the area of injection and followed for up to 5
`hours.
`38 (b) The above creams ware administered at carrageenan
`administration site and the solution of indomethacin was
`administered intramuscularly IS ainutes prior to
`carrageenan administration,
`(c) The circumference of the paw was again measured and
`35 the change in size was compared for the different
`treatments. The volume changes were measured Jby a
`plethysmo&eter (Ugc, Basel).
`
`0238
`
`

`
`wo 93/38752
`
`- 20 -
`
`PCT7US93/O28O0
`
`T&e results pressnteci in Table 2 deiBonstrata that a
`local application of indomsthacin in stibmicron droplet;
`cream was the most sffsctiye in reducing fche edama caused
`by the- carrageatian injectionf and was more effective than
`S lar^e droplets of indomsthacin craam or 'the sa©e dosa
`administered intramascularly.
`
`X&bie 2;
`
`p«rfdnB&i»c« of Olffersat xndottstttacia- FartaalatioHs
`la Paw SdexsiSt Model is Guiaea gigs
`Average change of circumference,
`aercaM.
`Hours after carrageenan
`inject: ion
`
`EKfeKPLE 20; A lidocaine submicron cream preparation was
`macife as follows: lidooaine 4 g, MCT oil 6.5 sag", lecithin
`0.8 g, ESRJLFOR .EL-620 1.5 g, water 73 ml and CARBOPOL
`1,7 g. Again, the procedures were the same as in- Examples
`1 and 17. The issaa droplet size was found to be 160 nm.
`
`EXMMPltE 21: ^Comparative) Ik convantionai, large droplet
`sise lidocaine craam was prepared as per Example 3 except
`with lidocaihe 4 g, HOT oil 5.3 g, emulsifying wax 8 g,
`petroleum 14 gf water' 6$ mi. The meah droplet size was
`greater than SO- microns.
`
`EXAMPLE 22; A small droplet siee eutectic local
`anesthetic was prepared as follows. 2,2 g lidocaine>
`
`treatment*
`control
`{Carrsgseiiari)
`irsdoffiethaciR 0.5%,
`IH cream staaii
`droplets
`Indomethacin in.
`cream, Large
`droplets
`rndomethacin 10
`sag/kg ivm. is
`solation
`
`So. of
`« X!.i.ataXs
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`i
`
`17
`0
`
`3
`si
`
`24
`
`32
`
`7,3
`
`4
`so
`32
`
`16
`
`55
`
`67
`
`47
`
`13
`
`22
`
`25
`
`36
`
`S
`S3
`
`36
`
`39
`
`33
`
`10
`
`IS
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`0239
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`- m -
`
`PCT/US93/02808
`
`2.2 g tetracaine, 2 « PLURObilC F-63, 89 g water, and
`carbopol 4 ,3 g> The preparatiorv procedure was as per
`Example l> the pH was adjusted to 7.5 and the mean dcoplet
`size was found to be 250 nanometers.
`
`EXAMPLE 23: (Coraparative} & conventional, large droplet
`sise eutectic local anesthetic was prepared as foMows.
`The sains formulation as in Example 22 was prepared but
`without the procedure to reduce the droplet sise. The
`final droplet size was found to be between 20~10S fm.
`
`The local anesthetic effect of topically
`EXAMPLE 24-
`applied lidocaine creams of Examples 20-23 were
`Each preparation was applied
`investigated and compared.,
`to the forearm of 4 male human volunteers and the degree
`of local anesthesia with time was monitored, ^gentle
`touch was made with a sharp needle and the sensitivity of
`an adjacent (untreated) area was compared to the
`application site to estimate the effectiveness of: the
`tested preparation. The experi»ent was blind for the
`volunteers. Ihe sensitivity at the site of application
`was given a score of intensity of 1 to 4 and an average
`dosage form perSormanGe Was calculated. The results are
`shown in l&hie 3.
`
`fabl® 3!
`Droplets
`Ejiaiaple #
`Drug Cone,, %
`Droplet sizej, ym
`Delay, hours
`Duration, hours
`Effectiveness
`(average Score)
`
`Average score {Effectiveness) of Small vs»
`targe Diroplet Size Xiidocaine creams
`Large
`small
`19
`•4
`0y2:5
`0.5
`4.5
`23
`
`1 ' - ' - ' - ' - ' - w w w w w w * — : t ' '
`
`4
`KHS'O
`3.
`3
`17
`
`10
`
`ts
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`0240
`
`

`
`WO 53/18752
`
`- 22 -
`
`PCr/US93/028O0
`
`These data, show that lidocaine alone in oleaginous
`base or In regular cream of emlsifylftg wax f i.e*, on<8:
`having a droplet size of greater than 50 mictons), was not
`effective as local anesthetic. However, the saall droplet
`5 siise prsparation of lidocaine provided local, anesthesia
`and performed better than larger droplet sis:® which was
`very poor. Moreover^ tha small droplet size ©utectic
`mixture psrforiaed better than the same foriauiafcion but
`with large droplet size, as shown in Table 4<
`
`10
`
`fable At Average Score (Effectiveness} of Small vs.
`Large Br op let Sisse Eutectic Local
`^aesthetic Mixture Cresms
`Small
`21
`4,4
`0.295
`0,3
`^5
`5S
`
`Large
`22
`4.4
`20-100
`0.5
`4,5
`40
`
`Droplets
`xs Exastple #
`Drxig Cone., %
`Groplet sise, m
`Delay, hours
`Duration, hours
`Effectiveness
`(Average Score)
`
`20
`
`EXAMPLE 25: A diclofenac submcron cream was prepared as
`follows; Oil phase - diclofenao diethylajsiaoniuro 12.2 g,
`MCT oil 17 0 g, LIPOID E-80 30 g, a-tocopherol succinate
`G,4 g? Aqueous phase - EDT.% disodiUK salt 1 g, EMJLFOR
`EL-62d 25 g, glycerol 17.5 g, preservatives {rr.ethyl and
`propyl parabenslp.Sf, reverse osmosis purified vater to
`1000 g»
`The composition was prepared as follows. The
`emulsion was prepared by combining the oil and aqueous
`phases together with a magnetic stirrer for 5 minutes,
`followed by a high-speed, high-shear stiaKsr (Folytron
`K3000} for S rainutes at 3000 RPM, The emulsion .which was
`obtained was treated by a high pressure homogenizer (APV-
`Gaulin) a-t 800 bar {6'ittinut^s, about 10 cycles) at
`
`•2S
`
`• W
`
`35
`
`0241
`
`

`
`wo £3/18752
`
`- 23 ~
`
`PCT/US93/028OO
`
`45-55 0C. After homogeniaation, the eauision was allowed
`to cool to room temperature/ the particle size
`distribution was determined and the emulsion was then
`filtered through a 0,4S micron pore sxz& filter (Onimodal)
`S size after 8 cycles/800 bar is 120 + 30 njs, with the dust
`before filtration being in the range of 2-4%.
`The creaifi formulation was prepared as follows; To
`1000 g of the emulsion, 50 g of 10% CABBOPOL 940, which
`was pre-swollen in purified water, was added and mixed
`is thoroughly with the Polytron K3OG0 device at 5-10,000 RPM
`for 2-3 ainutes. Pure trieth.anolamine was added drqpwise
`witi'i mixirsg to adjust the
`to 6~6.5. .A final fixing
`with; the Polytron K3000 deviGe at the saae conditious
`produces a cream which contaihs 1.16% Diclofenac DEA
`IS (which is squal to a i% solution of sodium diclofenac).
`After pH, viscosity and drug content testing, the cream is
`packed iftto aluminum tubes...
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`EXAMPLE 26: h. topical edema treatsient by diclofenac in
`different droplet size formulations was evaluated.
`A forauiation contaiining submicron droplets of diclofenac
`(Example 25} was compared to standard preparation using
`the carrageenan paw edensa model (guinea pigs}.
`Carrageenan (0~i ml of 0.1% solution) was injected into
`hind paw (at tirae-o). Start size of edema at time zero
`was taken as 100% level. Surface of edema was treated
`imisediately after carrageenan injection by test
`preparations:
`a) 1.16% diclofenac diethylaaamotvia (equivalent to 1.0%
`Diclofenac sodium} in sutamicron aniuision (90-150 nm
`droplets) (EKaisple 23} .
`b) YOLTAREN EMDLGEL (Ciba-Geigy) - as a reference
`composition with fcrtown activity, c) 1.16% diclofenac
`diethylammonia in large droplets (5-10 Mm}.
`Changes in volume were made using a p 1 ethysaometer (tJgo,
`Basel), and the results are shown in Pig. 1-
`
`0242
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`- 24 -
`
`PCr/US93/028Oe
`
`EXAMPLE a?: A plrojcicaja small droplet; crea® was prepared
`frio» the following companents: piroxicast 0.25
`MOT oil
`9.5 q, lacitfelB 0-5 g, Tw&en-80 0,5 g, water 38,4 gt
`carbopol 0,2 g, triethylamine 0,2 g. The composition was
`$ prepared as in Example 1, The meajr droplet size was fblind
`to be 127 nm.
`
`(Comparativs) A conventional pirojiicais (large
`ersam was prepared as follows; piroxicam
`10 0.178 g, MC3? oil 5 g, mtmt&ryI alcohol 2,7 q, sodium
`dodecyisalfafca 0.3 g, water 27 g„ After melting toget&er
`the cstostearyl alcohol with sodium dodecy1su1fate, the
`MCT oil was added- Firoxicaat was mixed with ready hot oil
`phase f and then 27 m.X of bailing water was added and mixed
`15 thoroughly. After cooling to room temperature, the creaitt
`was obtained.
`
`£:XAMPli£ 291 A topical edejna treatment by piroxicam in
`different eiaulsion forKUiations was studied. The
`20 submicron droplets of piroxicam (Example 27} was compared
`to standard creais (Example 28) using the carrageenan paw
`©dema modeX (guinea pigs) of Example 26. As shown in Fig.
`3, piroxicam in the cream of Exaiaple 27 demonstrates
`relatively low antiinflammatory activity, while the
`25 t:orm«lation of Example 26 was found to he much more
`effective.
`
`BXA&ffLB 30: A topical naproxen submicron cream was
`prepared froiu the following components; naproxen ig;
`30 Miglyoi 810 i7g; LIPOID E^SO 3gf a-tocopherol succinate
`0.04g; EMDltFOR BL~62Q 2.5g; glycerol l«75g; SPTA disodxujs
`dihydrats O.lg? CARBOPOL 940 O.Sg; triethanola»ine G.Sg;
`and pure water to lODg. The naproxen, SIGLYOL SlStj. LIPOID
`E-86 and a-tocopheroi succinate ware mixed together at
`3S 45®C until completely dissolved to form an oil phase. The
`EMCLFQ-R, giycerol and, BDTA were dissolved in water and
`mixed thoroughly with the oil phase in a high sheat Mixer
`
`0243
`
`

`
`wmmmi
`
`"* 25 —
`
`PCT/VS93/82S08
`
`{Poiytron K3000) for S minutes at about 20,000 HPS to form
`an emulsion. Further treatmsrvt of the eaulsioH is
`conducted in a high pressure horoogenizer (APV - Gaulin} at
`800 teat: for S cycles to a droplet sis© of about iOd-159
`•n»» After filtratioft through a 0.45 Kicroft filtey,
`CARB0P0L In the form of a preswollen gel (10% in water)
`was added arid mixed in the Polytron device for 2 ainutes
`at 5000 RPM. The triethanoiaroine was added to a final pH
`of 5.5-6.5 and the forffiuiatian was mixed in the Polytron
`device until a homogeneous cream was obtained.
`
`SMEM-ll: A topical edema treatzaent by naproxen in
`differeht fprjsulations was studied. A subxnioron droplet
`creaB of naproxen (Example 30} was comparsd to a standard
`cream using the carrageenan paw edema model (guinea pigs)
`of Exawplss 26 and 29 for the following formulationss
`a) Naproxen in a submicron ataulsion {100-150 rm droplets
`as per Example 30} applied topically,
`b) Naproxen in a conventional creasi (droplets larger than
`20 ffiicrons) applied topically.
`The results are illustrated in Fig. 3
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30'
`
`35
`
`0244
`
`

`
`WO 93/18752
`
`- 26 -
`
`PCT/US§3/O2S00
`
`THE CLAIMS
`
`'What: is claimed is:
`A composition.for topical application of
`X A
`gharmacenticaXs or cosmetics, coaprising submicron size
`S droplets comprising about 0.5 to 30% of a first component
`of an oily liquid, about 0.1 to 10% of a second coinporient
`of an emulsifisr and about 0.05 to S% of a non-ionic
`surfactsnt, said droplets having a m&an droplet size in
`the range of 0.05 to 0.5 am., wherein said composition
`10 provides aft ©nbanced topical and/or transderaal systemic
`effect compared to the same compositions which have larger
`sis®: droplets
`The cOKposition of claim 1 Ssrherein the mean
`droplet siae is between aboat 0.1 and 0,.3 M®.
`The coittposition of clai® 1 whereiii the first
`component comprises a mediuia chain triglyceride oil having
`a chain length of about S to 12 carbons, a vegetable oil,
`a aineral oil, an oil of animal source, a synthetic
`derivative thereof, or mixtures thereof,
`fhe composition of claim 3 wherein the first
`4.
`component is present in an amount of about 20 to 30% to
`farm a viscous composition.
`The composition of claim I wherein the
`5 >
`sjjittlsifier is a phospholipid compound or a mixture of
`phospholipids.
`6.
`The composition of claim 5 wherein the
`phospholipid is lecithin, phosphatidylcholine,
`pho sphat i dyi eth an o 1 am ine or misitures thereof .
`The composition of claim 5 wherein the
`eraulsifiar is present, in an amount of about 0,2 to 5%.
`8.
`The composition of clai® 1 wherein the
`surfactant is a non-ionic aXkylene oxide condensate of an
`organic compound which contains one or more hydroxy!
`-C^roups *
`The composition of claim 8 wherein the
`9-
`surfactant is an ethoxylated alcohoior ester compound.
`
`'2 k
`
`IS
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`0245
`
`

`
`WO <>3/18752
`
`- 27 ~
`
`PCT/lSS93/e2800
`
`10x The composition of claim 3 wherein the non~ionic
`surfactanl; is present in an amount of about 0,2 to 5%,
`11. The composition of ciiaim i which further
`comprises an active ingredient in an asaotant of 0.5 to 5%.
`12. 'The composition of claim 1 wherein the first
`component cbiaprises an active ingredient in the form of an
`essentially water-inso

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket