throbber
United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,578,586
`
`Glonek et al.
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`*Nov. 26, 1996
`
`USO05578586A
`
`[54] DRY EYE TREATMENT PROCESS AND
`SOLUTION
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Thomas Glonek, Oak Park, 111.; Jack
`‘I. Greiner, Winchester; Donald R.
`K°'b= B°St°“’ both °f Mass‘
`
`.
`A5S1g“e3- 0°“1‘“' Research of B°St°“v 1"“-v
`Boston, Mass.
`
`_
`Notice:
`
`,
`The term of th1s patent shall not extend
`beyond the expiration date of Pat. No.
`5,294,601
`
`APPL N°-‘ 192351
`Filed:
`Feb. 4, 1994
`
`Rented U_s_ Application Data
`
`Continuation of Ser. No. 898,375, Jun. 9, 1992, Pat. No.
`5,294,607, which is a continuation—in—part of Ser. No. 529,
`657, May 29, 1990, abandoned, Ser. No. 457,086, Dec. 26,
`1989, abandoned, Ser. No. 111,874, Oct. 23, 1987, Pat. No.
`4,914,088, and Ser. No. 33,185, Apr. 2, 1987, abandoned.
`
`U.S. Cl.
`
`Int. Cl.5 ........................ A61K 31/685; A61K 31/66;
`A61K 31/20
`................................. 514/76; 514/75; 514/78;
`514/558_ 514/912
`.
`Field of Search ................................ 514/76, git/59518i
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,522,803
`4,677,099
`4,804,539
`
`41818537
`4,839,175
`4,866,049
`4,908,154
`4,914,088
`4,938,965
`
`6/1985 Lenk et al.
`6/1987
`2/1989
`
`............................. .. 424/1.1
`........... .. 514/78
`..... .. 424/450
`
`4/1989
`6/1989 G110 ..........................
`9/1989 Maumenee et al.
`3/1990 Cook et al.
`..........
`4/1990 Glonek etal.
`7/1990 Shek et a1.
`............................ .. 424/450
`
`424/427
`424/450
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`1/1978 Australia.
`16149
`0241376 10/1987 European Pat. Off.
`0391369
`4/1990 European Pat. O11.
`
`.
`.
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Hardberger, Hanna and Boyd, “Effects of Drug Vehicles on
`Ocular Contact Time,” Arch. Ophthalmol., vol. 93, Jan.
`1975.
`
`.
`.
`P”"W>’ Em””"”*Z°hf‘=h F33’
`Attorney, Agent, or Fz'rm—Robert L. Goldberg
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`f
`_
`,
`_
`_
`d
`A
`m°‘h°d and °°mP°S‘“°“ f°’ ‘e “‘’“‘g °""‘P°““‘°“ ° an
`aqueous layer from the surface of the eye. The method
`comprises applying an admixture of a charged phospholipid
`and a non_P01ar on Over the eye’ preferably in the fem of
`a meta—stable oil in water emulsion in a dosage not exceed-
`mg 100 microlitem
`
`4,421,748 12/1983 Trager et a1.
`
`......................... .. 424/ 199
`
`22 Claims, N0 Drawings
`
`TEVA - EXHIBIT 1009
`
`TEVA - EXHIBIT 1009
`
`

`
`5,578,586
`
`1
`DRY EYE TREATNIENT PROCESS AND
`SOLUTION
`
`CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This is continuation of application(s) Ser. No. 07/898,375
`filed on Jun. 9, 1992, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,294,607 which is
`a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
`07/529,657, filed May 29, 1990, now abandoned and a
`continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
`07/457,086 filed Dec. 26, 1989, now abandoned and a
`continuation-in-part, of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
`07/111,874 filed Oct. 23, 1987, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,914,088
`and a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
`07/033,185 filed Apr. 2, 1987, now abandoned.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Introduction
`
`This invention relates to wetting the surface of the eye
`and/or an ocular prosthesis, providing mechanical lubrica-
`tion therefor, reducing the evaporation of fluid from the
`surface of the eye and if desired, delivering a medicant to the
`ocular surface. More particularly, the invention relates to a
`composition capable of augmenting and maintaining a stable
`tear film over the ocular surface and/or delivering a medi-
`cant to said surface without causing substantial blurring of
`vision. In a preferred embodiment of the invention,
`the
`invention relates to an ophthalmic composition for dry eye
`treatment. The invention is especially useful for treatment of
`individuals wearing ocular prostheses such as contact lenses,
`as the composition of the invention wets and provides
`lubrication for both the ocular surface and the surface of the
`prosthesis in contact with the ocular surfaces.
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`It is known in the art that an aqueous tear film extends
`over the ocular surfaces and maintains the ocular surface
`moist and lubricated. It is also known that dehydration of
`moisture from the eye may result in discomfort. Further, it
`is known that compositions are available in the market
`intended for dry eye treatment. These compositions are
`primarily aqueous materials that supplement the tear film.
`The feeling of discomfort resulting from a dry eye con-
`dition may include ocular dryness, grittiness, burning, sore-
`ness or scratching, dependent upon the subject and the
`condition of the subject. Proposed causes for dry eye,
`treatment and symptoms are described in a compendium of
`papers edited by Holly, The Preocular Tear Film in Health,
`Disease, and Contact Lens Wear, The Dry Eye Institute,
`Lubbock, Tex. 1986, incorporated herein by reference.
`The most common treatment for dry eye involves tem-
`porary alleviation of dry eye symptoms by topical applica-
`tion of a tear substitute that adds a large volume of liquid to
`the anterior surface of the eye and related adnexa. Typical
`tear substitute compositions comprise water soluble polymer
`solutions. Examples of such solutions include saline solu-
`tions of polyvinyl alcohol, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose
`or carboxymethyl celluloses. U.S. Pat. No. 4,421,748
`teaches an artificial tear composition comprising an aqueous
`hypotonic solution of lecithin and a viscosity adjusting agent
`such as a solution soluble cellulose.
`
`Methods used to quantify the effectiveness of tear sub-
`stitutes for dry eye treatment solutions have not been stan-
`dardized, and many methods used to quantify the results
`obtained using such tear substitute compositions are often
`
`2
`inaccurate. For this reason, it is known that reported relief of
`dry eye symptoms using known tear substitutes varies
`considerably from subject to subject, and regardless of the
`method used to quantify relief using a tear substitute, relief
`often does not exceed several minutes.
`
`The symptoms associated with dry eye are often exacer-
`bated with subjects using ocular prostheses such as contact
`lenses. In some cases, contact lens intolerance is caused in
`part, or in total, by the condition of dry eye and its symp-
`toms. Further,
`the rate of evaporation from the eye is
`accelerated by the nature of the contact lens surface and the
`physical presence of the contact lens results in meniscii
`formation with additional physical and evaporative effects,
`even with subjects having an adequate tear film. For many
`subjects, contact lens intolerance is not overcome by topical
`application of tear substitutes. Therefore, there is a need for
`improved compositions and processes for treatment of the
`dry eye condition and for improving tolerance to ocular
`prostheses.
`An improved composition for dry eye treatment is the
`subject of U.S. Pat. No. 4,914,088 incorporated herein by
`reference. This patent teaches the use of charged phospho-
`lipids for the treatment of dry eye symptoms. The addition
`of a charged phospholipid to the eye assists in replicating the
`tear film that would naturally occur in the eye. In accordance
`with the patent, the phospholipid composition, preferably in
`the form of an aqueous emulsion, is topically applied to the
`eye where it is believed to disperse over the ocular surface
`and form a film that replicates a lipid layer that would be
`formed by the spreading of a naturally occurring lipid
`secreted principally from the Meibornian glands during
`blinking. Because the phospholipid, when applied to the eye,
`carries a net charge, it is believed that aligned molecules
`repel each other preventing complex aggregate formation
`thereby resulting in a stable phospholipid film. The patent
`speculates that the film formed from the charged phospho-
`lipid assists in the formation of a barrier film reducing
`evaporation of the aqueous layer, thereby preserving the tear
`film.
`
`In copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/529,657,
`filed May 29, 1990, a further improvement in dry eye
`treatment is disclosed. In accordance with the disclosure of
`said application, the dry eye treatment composition of U.S.
`Pat. No. 4,914,088 is improved by the addition of an
`essentially non-polar oil to the eye treatment composition.
`The oil is added to improve the performance of a dry eye
`treatment composition by increasing the longevity of the tear
`film formed on the eye following addition of the dry eye
`treatment solution, presumably by providing and/or thick-
`ening the dehydration barrier (the oil layer) on the outer
`surface of the tear film. Thus, the oil increases the efiicacy
`of the dry eye treatment solution and reduces performance
`variability from subject to subject.
`The use of the dry eye treatment of the referenced
`application assists in overcoming dry eye symptoms as
`reported in the application. However, when using the pro-
`cedures and composition of the application, some subjects
`experience blurring following addition of the treatment
`composition containing the oil. The time required for the
`blur to clear is often unpredictable. In addition, relief of dry
`eye symptoms was found to vary somewhat from patient to
`patient.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention disclosed herein is a further improvement_
`over the inventions disclosed in the above referenced U.S.
`
`

`
`5,578,586
`
`3
`Pat. No. 4,914,088 and copending application Ser. No.
`07/529,657.
`In accordance with the invention disclosed
`herein, dry eye treatment compositions and processes are
`further improved by providing a controlled means for appli-
`cation of a dry eye treatment composition to the eye whereby
`blurred vision is reduced or eliminated and the residence
`
`time of tear film on the eye is prolonged.
`The invention herein is the result of several discoveries.
`First, it has been discovered that the total quantity of oil
`available to form a film over the ocular surface should be
`
`closely controlled. Secondly, and contrary to prior under-
`standing, it has been found that when the dry eye treatment
`composition is in the form of an emulsion, the emulsion is
`preferably added to the eye as a meta-stable emulsion, not as
`a finely divided, stable emulsion. Finally, it has been dis-
`covered that the surfactant used in the preparations of the
`preferred treatment composition be one that enables control
`of the amount of oil contained in an emulsion and enables
`
`rapid formation of an oil film over the ocular surface.
`To understand how the treatment compositions of the
`invention function and the basis for the improvements
`described herein, it is desirable to understand the mechanism
`by which a barrier film over the eye is capable of alleviating
`dry eye symptoms. The description that follows is based
`upon belief and that reported in the literature.
`It is reported that a naturally occurring tear film comprises
`a complex coating with three separate layers. The inner layer
`in contact with the ocular surface of the eye is said to be
`composed primarily of mucous, and renders the hydropho-
`bic epithelial cell surface hydrophilic. The middle layer of
`the tear film is an aqueous layer. This layer is the thickest
`portion of the tear film, is a source of moisture and lubri-
`cation for the eye and functions as an optical planarizing
`layer. The outer layer of the tear film, at the interface with
`the atmosphere, is a non-polar oily, naturally occurring lipid
`layer. This oily lipid layer is reported to act as a barrier that
`prevents evaporation of the aqueous layer (Mishima and
`Maurice: The oily layer of the tear film and evaporation from
`the corneal surface, Exp. Eye Res. 1961; 1:39-45). Finally,
`the oily layer is bound to the aqueous layer through a polar
`interfacial phospholipid layer.
`The polar phospholipid and non-polar oily lipid compo-
`nents of the tear film are thought to originate primarily from
`secretions of the Meibomian glands. The oily layer of the
`tear film is formed from these secretions and is constantly
`replenished during blinking by expression of the secretions
`from the Meibomian glands and then spreading of the same
`over the surface of the eye by the eyelids. By constantly
`spreading the polar and non-polar lipids over the eye during
`blinking, the tear film is maintained and evaporation of the
`aqueous middle layer of the tear film is minimized.
`A cause of dry eye is believed to be a deficiency in the
`quantity or quality of secretions from the Meibomian glands.
`It is postulated herein that a cause of dry eye is a deficiency
`in the polar lipid layer of the tear film, the non-polar oily
`lipid layer or both. Regardless of the cause of the deficiency,
`the compromised lipid layer fails to act as an adequate
`barrier against evaporation of the aqueous portion of the tear
`film resulting in one form of the dry eye condition.
`In accordance with the invention of U.S. Pat. No. 4,914,
`088, a charged phospholipid is added to the eye, preferably
`as an oil-in-water emulsion. Upon contact of the emulsion
`with the eye, it was thought that the phospholipid dispersed
`over the ocular surface to form a film replicating the lipid
`layer formed by spreading a naturally occurring lipid
`secreted from the Meibomian glands during blinking. Where
`
`4
`
`the phospholipid applied to the eye preferably carries a net
`charge, it is believed that the aligned molecules repel each
`other such that complex aggregate formation is prevented
`and the integrity of the phospholipid film is maintained. It
`was believed that the film formed from the phospholipid
`layer acted as a barrier, reducing evaporation of the aqueous
`layer, thereby preserving the tear film.
`In practice, it was found that treatment of dry eye symp-
`toms with the phospholipid compositions claimed in U.S.
`Pat. No. 4,914,088 resulted in substantial
`improvement
`relative to treatment with prior art Compositions. Films
`formed by the application of the phospholipid to the eye
`were found to be long lasting and application of the treat-
`ment composition did not cause blurring of vision any more
`severe than the blurring resulting from the application of
`prior art compositions for dry eye treatment or even physi-
`ological saline.
`Though the use of the dry eye treatment compositions of
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,914,088 provided relief of dry eye symptoms
`in the majority of patients treated as stated in said patent,
`with improved testing procedures developed subsequent to
`the filing of the application leading to the grant of said
`patent, it was found that there was variance in efficacy from
`patient to patient.
`In copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/529,657,
`an improved dry eye treatment composition is disclosed. The
`invention of the application was the discovery of the desir-
`ability of adding an oil to the eye for treatment of the dry eye
`condition. Thus, the invention of the copending application
`involved supplementing dry eye treatment by addition of an
`essentially non-polar oil to the eye. In a preferred embodi-
`ment of the invention, dry eye treatment involved adding a
`combination of a charged phospholipid and an essentially
`non-polar oil to the eye. In accordance with said application,
`though the charged phospholipid and the non-polar oil could
`be separately applied to the eye, it was preferred that the two
`components be combined in a single treatment composition,
`most preferably in the form of a finely divided stable
`oil-in-water emulsion. A stable emulsion was desired for
`
`long term storage in a container. Upon application of the
`phospholipid and oil to the eye, whether as separate addi-
`tions or as a single treatment composition, it was postulated
`that the negatively charged phospholipid layer formed an
`aligned film over the aqueous tear film with charged ends
`dissolved in the aqueous layer and hydrophobic ends fur-
`thest removed from the aqueous layer available to bond with
`the non-polar oil layer. This caused the oil layer to disperse
`over the top surface of the eye as a thin, continuous and
`stable layer that functioned as an evaporation barrier. Rec-
`ognizing that the tear film naturally occurring in the eye may
`be deficient in the phospholipid component, the oil compo-
`nent, or both, the preferred embodiment of the treatment
`composition of said application replenished both compo-
`nents of the tear film, thereby reducing variations in efficacy
`from patient to patient.
`Use of the treatment compositions of the copending
`application results in formation of a tear film over the eye
`that alleviates dry eye symptoms and increases patient
`tolerance for ocular prostheses as described in said applica-
`tion. However, as a consequence of treatment with the
`solution, some subjects experienced blurred vision both
`initially upon application of the treatment composition to the
`eye, and in some cases over a prolonged time. In accordance
`with the invention described herein, the dry eye composi-
`tions alleviate dry eye symptoms at least as elfectively as
`those of
`the above-referenced copending application,
`enhance patient tolerance to ocular prostheses, and provide
`
`

`
`5,578,586
`
`5
`
`the fiirther advantage of essentially avoiding prolonged
`blurred vision. In addition, in accordance with the subject
`invention, the residence time of the film is increased.
`In accordance with the invention, it has been found that
`the above described improvements are realized if any one or
`more of the following is practiced:
`(l) the total amount of oil comprising the film over the
`ocular surface is controlled;
`(2) the treatment composition is added to the eye in the
`form of a meta-stable emulsion; and
`(3) the treatment composition, in the form of an emulsion,
`contains a surfactant that permits increase in the oil
`content of an emulsion with decreased phospholipid
`content and enables rapid formation of a film of the
`eflicacious components of the treatment composition
`over the ocular surface. With regard to control of the
`amount of oil comprising the film over the eye,
`it
`should be recognized that the oil layer is a thin film and
`the total volume of oil required to form this thin film is
`extremely small. If the oil component of the tear film is
`excessively thick or irregular (beaded), the patient will
`experience prolonged blurred vision. The problem is
`exacerabated when the oil is a polar oil rather than the
`preferred non-polar oil.
`The process of formation of a tear film following addition
`of a treatment composition to the eye is a dynamic process
`with many steps involved. If the treatment composition is in
`the form of an emulsion, several processes are simulta-
`neously set in motion immediately following the addition of
`the emulsion to the eye. The emulsion begins to differentiate
`while the dispersed oil phase spreads over the ocular surface.
`In addition, the amount of a fluid additive retained by the eye
`is up to about 10 microliters (ul). It is believed that if the
`volume of a fluid additive increases above about 10 ul,
`excess fluid moves to the canthi and rapidly enters the tear
`duct or is expressed from the eye as tears. This can occur
`within four to five blinks following addition of the treatment
`composition to the eye. Discharge of excess fluid will result
`in discharge of treatment components of the fluid from the
`eye, making them unavailable to form and sustain the tear '
`film. This problem is exacerbated if the fluid is in the form
`of an emulsion which does not rapidly differentiate liberat-
`ing treatment components. Consequently, the concentration
`of the treatment components of the emulsion must be
`suflicient to treat the eye and compensate for that lost by
`discharge from the eye but should not be excessive and
`cause blurring.
`In accordance with the invention, recognizing that the
`formation of a tear film is a dynamic process as described
`above, the total amount of oil available for formation of a
`film preferably does not exceed 25 111, more preferably varies
`between about
`1 and 10 ul and most preferably varies
`between about 1 and 5 111. Of this amount, only a small
`portion will be available to form the oil layer over the ocular
`surface. As the amount of oil available for film formation
`exceeds about 10 ul,
`the oil film formed over the eye
`becomes excessively thick or, alternatively, oil globules may
`form on the surface of the eye and not spread evenly over the
`eye. In either case, the patient is likely to experience blurring
`due to excessive oil. The amount of oil beyond which
`blurring will occur varies from patient to patient and is
`dependent upon the specific oil uses.
`The treatment compositions of the invention are desirably
`formulated to permit self administration by a patient. It is
`difficult for a patient to self-administer low volumes of
`treatment composition—i.e., amounts of from 1 to 10 111.
`Therefore,
`to render the formulations suitable for self-
`
`6
`administration, it is desirable to disperse the active com-
`pounds of the formulation in a suitable vehicle that permits
`administration of larger volumes by the patient. To control
`the volume of oils available for formation of the tear film
`without excessive discharge of treatment composition from
`the eye and to provide water to augment the aqueous portion
`of the tear film, the total amount of a liquid treatment
`composition added to the eye per treatment per eye prefer-
`ably does not exceed 100 microliters (111) (about 2 drops) and
`more preferably varies between about 25 and 50 ul. Since it
`is desired to limit the total volume of treatment composition
`added to the eye while recognizing that excess is discharged
`from the eye by blinking, and that the total volume of oil
`must be controlled, it is apparent that the concentration of oil
`in the treatment solution must be adjusted to provide the
`desired small dosage of oil to the eye and compensate for
`that lost due to discharge of excess treatment composition.
`For reasons stated above, rapid formation of the oil film
`over the corneal surface is desirable. If the film does not
`
`in the treatment composition may be
`form rapidly, oil
`discharged from the eye before it can form a satisfactory
`film. When oil is added in the form of an emulsion, the
`emulsion should differentiate rapidly on entering the eye to
`provide oil for formation of a film before excessive oil is
`discharged from the eye with excess treatment composition.
`The formation of the oil film is desirably assisted by use of
`a surfactant in the treatment composition which assists in
`spreading the oil over the eye. The surfactant should be one
`that enables rapid phase differentiation and further, should
`be one compatible with composition components and physi-
`ologically compatible with the eye—i.e., it should not be
`toxic nor cause stinging.
`From the above discussion, it is apparent that it is unde-
`sirable to provide a treatment composition in the form of an
`excessively stable emulsion for several reasons. An emul-
`sion is often optically opaque due to the presence of distinct
`dispersed phases. Therefore, an emulsion over the surface of
`the eye is expected to cause blurring. The duration of blur is
`dependent upon the time required for the emulsion to
`differentiate and form separate layers replicating a tear film.
`Consequently, blurring is likely to occur until the emulsion
`differentiates. In addition, and as discussed above, if the
`emulsion is too stable, excess emulsion will be discharged
`from the eye. Discharge of the emulsion from the eye will
`result in discharge of eflicacious components of the treat-
`ment solution from the eye before a tear film can be formed
`and these components will not be available for formation of
`the tear film. Therefore, in accordance with this invention, it
`is preferred that the emulsion be stable for long term storage,
`but rapidly differentiate in the eye. This is difficult to achieve
`with existing technology and for purposes herein it is desired
`that the emulsion be meta-stable where a meta-stable emul-
`
`sion is defined as a composition that is sufiiciently stable to
`provide a uniform dose to the eye but is relatively unstable
`and rapidly differentiates upon contact with the eye, pref-
`erably diiferentiating within about 5 blinks following appli-
`cation of the composition to the eye, more preferably in a
`time of less than about 30 seconds. Blurring may occur
`during the time required to move the bulk of the excess
`liquid to the canthi and discharge the same from the eye.
`In accordance with the copending application, non-polar
`oils were used for dry eye treatment because the use of polar
`oils caused substantial blurring. It is a further discovery of
`this invention that though non-polar oils are preferred, polar
`oils may be used to alleviate dry eye symptoms without
`significant blurring if their volume available for film forma-
`tion is carefully controlled within the most preferred con-
`
`

`
`5,578,586
`
`7
`centration range of from 1 to 5 ul, more preferably 1 to 3 111
`or if the polar oils are diluted with non-polar oils.
`Based upon the above,
`the invention described herein
`comprises treatment of the eye with either a charged phos-
`pholipid, an oil, preferably an essentially non-polar oil, or
`both,
`in amounts and in a treatment solution form that
`reduces or eliminates blurring and prolongs the residence
`time of an artificially formed replicated tear film on the eye.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`The treatment compositions of the invention comprise a
`charged phospholipid and art oil. They are applied by topical
`application to the eye. Topical application is by application
`of each component separately or preferably by single treat-
`ment composition containing the two components in a single
`liquid vehicle such as an emulsion. More preferably, the
`emulsion is an aqueous oil—in-water, meta-stable emulsion
`where the oil comprises the dispersed (organic) phase of the
`emulsion.
`
`Phospholipids suitable for purposes of the invention are
`known in the art to be complex and to carry a net positive
`or negative charge under conditions of use. The preferred
`materials are those carrying a net negative charge because
`the negatively charged material will be repelled by the
`negatively charged ocular surface thereby permitting the
`maintenance of a relatively thick aqueous layer. The posi-
`tively charged phospholipid will be attracted to the nega-
`tively charged ocular surface thus compressing the tear film.
`Hence the positively charged phospholipids operate in a
`dilferent manner than the negatively charged phospholipids
`and are lesser preferred.
`It is known that complex phospholipids contain a polar
`group at one end of their molecular structure and a non-polar
`group at the opposite end of the molecular structure. A
`discussion of phospholipids can be found in Leninger,
`Biochemistry, 2 ed., Worth Publishers, New York, pp.
`279-306, incorporated herein by reference.
`Many complex phospholipids are known in the art. They
`differ in size, shape and the electric charge of their polar
`head groups. Phosphoglycerides are compounds where one
`primary hydroxyl group of glycerol is esterified to phospho-
`ric acid, and the other two hydroxyl groups are esterified
`with fatty acids. The parent compound of the series is,
`therefore, the phosphoric acid ester of glycerol. This com-
`pound has an asymmetric carbon atom and, therefore, the
`term phosphoglycerides includes stereoisomers.
`the
`All phosphoglycerides have a negative charge at
`phosphate group at pH 7, and the pK,, of this group is in the
`range of l
`to 2. The head groups of phosphatidylinositol,
`phosphatidylglycerol
`including
`diphosphatidylglycerols
`(having the common name cardiolipins) and the phosphati-
`dylsugars have no electric charge, and all are polar because
`of their high hydroxyl group content. Because of the nega-
`tive charge of the phosphate group and the absence of a
`charge in the head group, the net charge of each of these
`materials is negative, and these materials are within the
`scope of the invention. Likewise, the head group of phos-
`phatidylserine contains an alpha—amino group (pKa=l0)
`and, a carboxyl group (pKa=3) and therefore, the molecule
`contains two negative charges and one positive charge at pH
`7.0, giving it a net negative charge whereby this compound
`is also within the scope of the invention.
`Complex phospholipids having a net positive charge are
`also within the scope of this invention but are lesser pre-
`
`8
`ferred for reasons given above and because of the high price
`and scarcity of these compounds. Examples of positively
`charged complex phospholipids within the scope of the
`invention are those containing the basic acyl amino acid
`groups. Such compounds are a subgroup within the family
`of the o-aminoacylphosphatidylglycerols.
`In contrast to the charged phospholipids, the head groups
`of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine (leci-
`thin) have a positive charge at pH 7, and, thus, at this pH,
`these two phosphoglycerides are dipolar zwitterions with no
`net electric charge. Such compounds are not within the
`scope of this invention unless chemically reacted to impart
`a negative charge to the material.
`Of the phospholipids discussed above, the net negatively
`charged phosphoglycerides are preferred. A more preferred
`class of phosphoglycerides are represented by the following
`formula:
`
`X
`
`where R‘ and R are each fatty acid residues preferably
`having from 8 to 24 carbon atoms; X is hydrogen, a polyol
`or a 3'-O -arninoacylphosphatidylglycerol; and M is one
`equivalent of a countercation. R and R‘ are typically com-
`mon natural fatty acids having an even or odd number of
`carbon atoms; they may be the same or may dilfer from each
`other; and they may be saturated, monounsaturated or poly-
`unsaturated. Examples of fatty acid residues include laurate,
`myristate, palmitate, stearate, oleate, linoleate, octanoate,
`dodecate, lignocerate, etc.
`Phospholipids are available from a variety of sources such
`as egg yolks, soy beans, etc. as is known in the art. These
`sources typically contain a mixture of components including
`natural lipids as exemplified by glyceridcs, cholesterol and
`cholesterol esters; phospholipids having a net charge of zero
`as exemplified by phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethano-
`larnine; various unsaturated and saturated fatty acids; and
`charged phospholipids such as phosphatidylglycerol and
`phosphatidylinositol. The charged phospholipids are typi-
`cally contained in these naturally occurring products in
`minor concentration,
`typically varying from below one
`percent up to 10 to 15 percent of the total composition.
`Accordingly, the concentration of the charged phospho-
`lipid from such a natural source would likely be insuflicient
`for purposes of treatment in accordance with the invention,
`and a complex phospholipid having a net charge, preferably
`a net negative charge, would be added to such a phospho-
`lipid source to increase the total concentration of the com-
`plex charged phospholipids to a concentration required for
`treatment in accordance with the invention. Obviously, if a
`phospholipid from a natural source is negatively charged, a
`negatively charged phospholipid would be added to supple-
`ment the concentration of the same whereby the total net
`charge remains negative.
`The most preferred phospholipid for purposes of this
`invention is a polyol with a net negative charge. The most
`preferred polyol phospholipids are the phosphatidylglycer-
`ols, including cardiolipins and phosphatidylinositols. With-
`out wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the
`hydroxyl groups of the head groups of these phospholipids
`
`

`
`9
`
`10
`
`5,578,586
`
`participate in hydrogen bonding with the aqueous portion of
`the tear film thus stabilizing the film formed over the eye for
`an extended time.
`In accordance with the invention, an oil is also applied to
`the eye as a treatment material. As is known in the art, oils
`may be derived from animals, plants, nuts, petroleum, etc.
`Those derived from animals, plant seeds, and nuts are
`similar to fats and are primarily glycerides or fatty acids and
`consequently, contain a significant number of acid and/or
`ester groups rendering the same polar and lesser preferred
`for purposes of the invention. Alternatively, oils derived
`from petroleum are usually aliphatic or aromatic hydrocar-
`bons that are essentially free of polar substitution and
`therefore suitable for purposes of the present invention
`provided the oil is refined so as to be compatible with human
`tissue such as the ocular surface. Preferably, the oil is a
`hydrocarbon oil having from 10 to 50 carbon atoms and
`more preferably, the oil is a saturated n-alkane or isoalkane
`hydrocarbon having from 14 to 26 carbon atoms. Unsatur-
`ated alkene hydrocarbons may be used but are less chemi-
`cally stable as the double bonds tend to oxidize. Aromatic
`oils are lesser preferred because it is known that aromatic
`compounds are for the most part unsuitable for application
`to the ocular surface.
`-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket