throbber
-r
`
`Intraocular Penetration of Topically Applied
`Cyclosporine
`
`R.L Kaswan
`
`cell
`
`YCLOSPORINE CsA is
`potent
`immunosuppressive drug with specific
`inhibitory activity CsA appears to inter
`rupt
`cell activation at an early point by
`interfering with activation of
`intracellular
`mechanisms following antigen binding with
`resultant blockade
`cas
`of
`the lymphokine
`cade CsA has proven to be very beneficial
`in
`and certain autoim
`organ
`transplantation
`mune disorders in man.2 Recently systemi
`cally administered CsA has been found to be
`in Sjogrens syndrome3 and some
`beneficial
`forms of uveitis in both people and experimen
`tal species.4-2 Additionally topically applied
`CsA has been found to be useful
`in corneal
`allografts35 vernal
`
`keratoconjunctivitis6
`sicca7 immune me
`keratoconjunctivitis
`diated keratitist necrotizing scleritis19 and
`herpetic stromal keratitis.t2 These studies
`local ocular
`
`that
`
`immunosuppression
`suggest
`provides adequate therapy while avoiding the
`risks of generalized immunosuppression and
`renal toxicity
`topically applied CsA for
`The efficacy of
`external ocular disorders led us to conjecture
`that if CsA can reach therapeutic levels inside
`the eye following topical application it might
`be possible to treat
`intraocular diseases such
`
`From the Departments of Small Animal Medicine and
`Veterinary Pharmacology/Physiology
`College of Veteri
`nary Medicine University of Georgia Athens
`Supported
`in part by the National Eye Institute
`Institutes of Health R03 EY05720-Ol
`National
`The
`National Society for the Prevention of Blindness
`The
`University of Georgia Veterinary Medical Experimental
`Station 29-26-GR207-002 and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals
`Inc
`
`Kaswan DVM
`Address reprint requests to Renee
`MS Department of Small Animal Medicine College of
`Veterinary Medicine University of Georgia Athens GA
`30602
`1988 by Grune Stratton Inc
`
`0041-1345/88/2002-2121
`
`$03.00/U
`
`650
`
`as
`
`immune mediated uveitis with topical
`application Specific advantages to use of topi
`cal CsA as compared to corticosteroids would
`include lack of collagenase activation when
`immune suppression is indicated in eyes with
`corneas and potentially improved
`ulcerated
`immunosuppressive activity
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Rabbits
`
`rabbits
`
`female New Zealand White NZW
`We used 33 adult
`to 4kg divided into 11 groups of three rabbits
`Tetracycline
`g/gallon was added to the drinking water
`for prophylaxis of Pasteurella infection
`
`Treatment
`
`solution of 1% CsA radiolabeled with 3H specific
`activity of 8.5 zCi/mg kindly supplied by William
`Robinson Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Hanover NJ was
`prepared in olive oil Sigma St Louis Three rabbits
`containing olive oil without CsA as
`received
`eyedrops
`controls
`Varimetric positive
`displacement
`pipettor Labindustries Berkeley CA was used to
`ttL eyedrops This volume was chosen to avoid
`spillover since the tear volume in the rabbit
`
`negative
`
`deliver
`
`averages
`lead to greater
`
`pL.2
`
`Increased
`
`drop size does not
`confounds
`corneal
`hut
`penetration22
`topical absorption
`with recirculation following absorption of drugs through
`the nasolacrimal system Drops were applied to the dorsal
`limbus One drop was applied every
`corneoscleral
`15
`The total body dose per
`minutes for six applications.23
`rabbit was 0.84 mg CsA or 0.24 mg/kg The
`time
`from the last application until enucleation was
`interval
`varied from one to 72 hours Fig
`killed at each interval
`
`with three animals
`
`Sample Collection
`
`Rabbits were anesthetized with xylazine
`mg/kg
`IM Samples
`and ketamine 35 mg/kg intramuscularly
`of 200 ML of aqueous humor were drawn with
`30-gauge
`needle and tuberculin syringe inserted at
`limbus After heparinized cardiac
`blood
`samples were
`drawn the rabbits were killed with pentobarbital 325
`mg intracardiac
`Both eyes were enucleated
`injection
`and frozen Clean instruments were used for each rabbit
`Globes were dissected
`
`the corneal
`
`by the method of Abel and
`BoyleJ Briefly the globes were transected
`
`at
`
`the equa
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1011-0001
`
`

`
`INTRAOCULAR PENETRATION
`
`OF CYCLOSPORINE
`
`651
`
`9000
`
`0000
`
`7000
`
`6000
`
`5000
`
`4000
`
`0000
`
`2000
`
`000
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`Sb
`
`Anterior
`
`Sciera
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`Time hours
`
`so
`
`so
`
`Time Sours
`
`Retina
`
`03i0Tirno4Lrs5bbb70
`
`00
`
`Aqueous
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`Time hours
`
`50
`
`00
`
`70
`
`90
`
`90
`
`70
`
`00
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`11
`
`Time hours
`
`40
`Time hours
`
`zL of 1% 3HC5A in
`CsA content
`in various ocular tissues of the rabbit eye following six applications of
`Fig
`have been calculated from the specific activity of 3HCsA and expressed as nglg tissue or
`olive oil Concentrations
`ng/mL fluid Six eyes have been used for each individual point
`
`__
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1011-0002
`
`

`
`652
`
`R.L KASWAN
`
`In rabbits
`
`in three times its weight of
`
`tor The frozen vitreous was extruded and collected The
`iris and ciliary body choroid with retina
`anterior uvea
`lens cornea anterior selera and posterior sclera were
`dissected individually processed
`and assayed
`killed at two hours post-CsA treatment
`the lacrimal gland
`of the third eyelid was also removed and assayed Each
`tissue was digested
`ocular
`collagenase Sigma type
`in Michaelis barbital buffer.25
`Next 100 uL of collagenase buffer solution was added to
`each vitreous sample Tissue digests 250 pL whole blood
`and 100 tL aqueous samples were transferred to scintilla
`tion vials and mixed with 10 mL Scintiverse
`Blood
`samples were decolorized with BTS-450 Beckman
`Atlanta 30% H202 and glacial acetic acid.26 The disin
`tegrations were assayed as counts per minute cpm using
`Beckman LS 7000 liquid scintillation counter Counting
`assay was determined by H-number
`for each
`efficiency
`quench correction using commercial external standards
`for data conversion
`per minute
`to disintegrations
`DPM.26 Conversion to mg CsA was made
`following equation
`
`by the
`
`2.2
`
`06 DPM/pCi
`
`DPM of sample
`106 ng/mg
`8.5 MCi 3H/mg CsA
`ng CsA/g tissue
`
`tissue wt
`
`tissues were used for background
`Negative control
`traction of DPM for each tissue type
`Blood samples from rabbits from each time group were
`blind manner by Sandoz Research
`assayed in
`Institute
`
`sub
`
`tissue-burning technique
`to assay the vaporized
`using
`tridium from each
`blood sample because the tissue-
`for whole
`blood
`burning assay has higher sensitivity
`samples than can be attained with liquid scintillation.6
`
`RESULTS
`
`Figure
`
`illustrates the CsA content of the
`and ocular
`tissues Peak
`aqueous vitreous
`concentrations
`were reached within the first
`four hours in all tissues Tissue concentrations
`in excess of minimal therapeutic levels 50 to
`300 ng CsA/g tissue6 were achieved within
`one hour and maintained for at least 24 hours
`in the cornea anterior and posterior selera
`Levels of CsA were below therapeutic values
`within two hours in the retina vitreous and
`aqueous samples The average level of CsA in
`the laerimal gland of
`the third eyelid was
`2850 ng/g at two hours post-CsA treatment
`Iris and ciliary body CsA concentrations were
`therapy of uveitis6
`at equivocal
`levels
`for
`between 50 and 200 ng/g tissue Fig
`for all
`samples taken between one and 24 hours
`
`anterior
`
`The elimination rates of CsA in the cornea
`and anterior
`and posterior
`uvea
`sclera were determined as the slopes of
`terminal phase of
`the concentration
`time
`curves using
`two compartmental
`visually fit
`model.27 The elimination half-life was calcu
`lated as 0.693 divided by the elimination rate
`and was found to be 33.5 hours 26.7 hours
`19.5 hours and 20.0 hours respectively
`Amongst
`20 blood
`samples
`assayed for
`by both liquid scintillation and
`radioactivity
`tissue burning techniques only one
`had significant
`than
`greater
`radioactivity
`three times baseline and it was identified by
`both methods The CsA content of this sample
`was 57 ng No radioactivity was detected in
`the remaining 10 samples which were assayed
`but
`not
`by
`liquid scintillation
`by
`tissue-
`
`the
`
`sample
`
`burning techniques
`The pigmented tissues and especially the
`whole blood samples were most affected
`by
`chemiluminescence The presence of biologic
`pigments
`red pigments
`causes
`especially
`level cpm values confounding the
`high control
`background activity The use of antioxidants
`and bleaching
`agents reduced this error but
`did not eliminate it making small amounts
`less than 50 ng/mL of CsA in the blood
`impossible to detect
`by liquid scintillation
`Use of
`the tissue-burning technique
`on por
`tions of
`confirmed that
`these samples
`no
`detectable CsA occurred
`in blood samples
`except one sample taken at
`hours posttreat
`ment
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Two major questions must be determined
`before topical CsA would prove to have practi
`importance for uveitis Can CsA reach the
`cal
`target organ in therapeutic levels following
`reasonable therapeutic regimens Is the effect
`of CsA mediated locally in the eye or does
`the inhibition of
`intraocular
`inflammation
`
`require systemic immunosuppression
`CsA is an undecapeptide with molecular
`weight of 1202 The therapeutic range for
`is 200 to 600 ng/mL
`organ transplantation
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1011-0003
`
`

`
`INTRAOCULAR PENETRATION OF CYCLOSPORINE
`
`653
`
`the intraocular
`
`it
`
`serum but
`level speculated to
`be needed for control of uveitis is 50 to 300
`the key event is inhib
`ng/mL6 Alternately if
`iting the triggering of
`release
`lymphokine
`cells the required intraocu
`from activated
`to 199 ng/mL CsA
`lar dose would be only
`Compared to most ophthalmic medications
`CsA is
`large molecule but
`is highly
`lipophillic If compounds are lipid soluble and
`and conjunctival
`through the corneal
`pass
`size does not appreciably
`epithelium their
`Intraocular
`the
`alter
`rate of
`
`absorption of
`
`transport.28
`large molecular weight drugs
`inter
`
`occurs across the conjunctival-scleral
`the
`of passage
`face
`bypassing
`necessity
`through the aqueous humor.29 CsAs absence
`in the aqueous humor303 was therefore not
`discouraging because the aqueous is an inap
`for sampling of intra
`propriate compartment
`ocular drug absorption for those drugs that
`depend upon noncorneal absorption routes.29
`Since the total volume of CsA given to each
`in the present study was
`experimental animal
`zL 1% CsA in each eye the total
`doses of
`rabbit was 0.84 mg or 0.24
`body dose per
`mg/kg.2 The recommended systemic dose of
`CsA is 10 to 20 mg/kg2 or 60 to 120 times
`used
`than
`the doses
`in this study.2
`higher
`Following therapeutic dosage in people with
`levels were only 40% of
`uveitis intraocular
`serum levels.32 Bell and coworkers
`report
`aqueous levels of 12 to 49 ng/mL33 following
`topical or systemic administration to rabbits
`the RIA
`but
`the lower limit of sensitivity of
`assay used was 45 ng/mL.34
`the
`Based on
`absence of detectable CsA in 29 of 30 blood
`samples and the minimal
`total body doses
`used intraocular
`levels in this study probably
`were not due to blood redistribution
`Wiederholt and coworkers studied intraoc
`ular penetration of 1% CsA dissolved in castor
`reported their results in cpm rather
`oil but
`universally comparable term.26 The
`corneal half-life in both studies is remarkably
`long 34 hours in this study and 52 hours in
`Wiederholts.35 Our
`findings do not support
`the intraocular
`
`than in
`
`their conclusion
`
`that
`
`levels
`
`occur due to blood redistribution to both eyes
`following CsA administration to either eye.35
`The concentration of CsA reached in the
`present study was well above therapeutic lev
`els in the cornea and in anterior and posterior
`sclera but the intraocular CsA levels achieved
`low The
`uvea
`approached
`were
`anterior
`levels with levels
`hypothesized therapeutic
`ranging from 50 to 200 ng/gm An assay of
`state pharmaeokinetics with chronic
`steady
`for five elimination half-lifes
`administration
`eyes may be
`and
`from inflamed
`assays
`required to determine whether or not higher
`therapeutic levels can be achieved in the ante
`and retina under
`rior uvea
`typical clinical
`
`cell
`
`conditions
`Where is the target site If CsA works by
`entering the eye and blocking intraocular
`cells responding to ocular antigens within the
`inflamed eye then local administration can be
`advocated
`If however ocular antigens
`are
`disseminated to lymphatic organs where
`systemic CsA therapy
`occurs
`activation
`would be mandated
`Topical CsA had demonstrated efficacy in
`immune-mediated diseases of the cornea and
`sclera including experimental corneal graft
`transplantation35 vernal keratoeonjunetivi
`sicca7 chronic im
`tis6 keratoconjunctivitis
`mune mediated keratitis8 neerotizing scleri
`tis9 and
`stromal
`herpetic
`experimental
`keratitis.82 In dogs with keratoconjunctivitis
`sicca topical CsA ameliorated the chronic
`keratitis and increased the average Schirmer
`mm/mini7
`These studies
`by
`tear
`test
`immune suppres
`that
`local
`strongly suggest
`immune-mediated
`sion is adequate to control
`disorders with CsA providing
`the CsA
`the target tissue
`reaches therapeutic levels at
`The
`data confirm
`present pharmacokinetic
`that CsA levels are very high in the lacrimal
`the third eyelid cornea and sciera
`gland of
`following topical dosage
`The question of whether or not uveitis can
`be controlled with topical CsA has been more
`elusive The intraocular dosage of CsA may
`inflammation at all
`not be sufficient to control
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1011-0004
`
`

`
`654
`
`R.L KASWAN
`
`areas of
`
`antigens
`
`cell
`
`the globe The current
`investigation
`and previous kinetic work has determined the
`elimination half-life but has not addressed
`state intraocular
`the steady
`concentrations
`one would anticipate during multiple chronic
`dosage
`Previous uveitis studies that used intrasub
`ject positive control eyes may have inadver
`immune reaction
`tently triggered an afferent
`in the positive control eye causing
`immune response with an efferent
`response
`occurring in both the control and treated eye.6
`Studies that treated both eyes with CsA and
`used an extrasubject positive control were
`Two studies
`more successful.6
`have exam
`for topical CsA in experi
`ined the potential
`mental uveitis When Nussenblatt
`and
`coworkers6 tested CsA in
`limited number of
`rats with experimental autoimmune uveitis
`they could not separate systemic effects from
`topical effects because the ophthalmic drops
`used were so large 50 1iL and the subjects so
`small 200
`rats that
`serum
`therapeutic
`levels were reached via nasolacrimal absorp
`tion Considering the mechanism of CsA
`activity the problem of differentiating
`the
`effects of systemic absorption of topical drug
`was not well addressed by unilateral
`drug
`dosing CsA prevents initiation of the immune
`recognition of
`response by blocking
`and thereafter production of
`inter
`which
`leukin
`the
`activates
`cascading
`immune response Antigenic recognition and
`lymphocyte activation within the untreated
`eye would be expected to trigger
`systemic
`immune response36 affecting both eyes there
`fore unilateral treatment designs would likely
`of Nussenblatts work
`fail Re-evaluation
`
`systemic
`
`treatment
`
`in
`
`topical
`
`therapy
`
`experimental
`
`demonstrates that bilateral
`was effective
`in preventing
`autoimmune uveitis EAU at concentrations
`of 2% 0.5% 0.2% but unilateral
`did not show
`significant beneficial effect
`the eye treated with 2% 0.5% and 0.2% CsA.6
`This result was attributed to the fact
`that rats
`receiving bilateral drops got more volume of
`CsA but actually the rats receiving unila
`teral 2% CsA had more total CsA than rats
`with bilateral 0.5% or 0.2% treatments An
`is the intrasub
`alternate explanation is that it
`instigates EAU
`ject positive control eye that
`in the CsA-treated eye37 and that bilateral
`CsA is effective in EAU Based on the small
`sample size two rats per
`treatment group
`and the ambiguity of results further investi
`gation into use of topical CsA for uveitis may
`be warranted
`
`of
`
`topical CsA for
`Advocacy
`intraocular
`disease still awaits proof positive of intraocu
`lar penetration What
`is most encouraging
`from our data is that CsA does reach very
`high levels in the cornea selera and lacrimal
`gland of
`the rabbit Considering the results
`trials of CsA in corneal
`from topical
`trans
`plantation35
`stromal
`herpes
`keratitis182
`sicea7 and chronic im
`keratoconjunctivitis
`mune mediated keratitis15 it
`is predictable
`that other immune-mediated disorders of the
`cornea
`and sclera may also
`conjunctiva
`respond positively to topical CsA
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`The author thanks Susan Gardner for her expert advice
`on ocular pharmacokinetics
`Antoinette
`Jernigan for
`assistance with the pharmacokinetic determinations
`and
`William Robinson for furnishing 3HCsA and for perform
`ing corroborative assays
`
`REFERENCES
`In Schindler ed Ciclosporin
`Borel iF Ryffel
`disease New York Springer-Verlag
`in autoimmune
`1985 p24
`Kahan BD Cyclosporine Biological Activity and
`Clinical Applications Philadelphia Grune
`Stratton
`1983
`
`Leuenberger PM Mieschcr PA KIm Mbl Augen
`heik 190290 1987
`
`Nussenblatt RB Palestine AG Chan CC Ocular
`Pharmacol 1369 1985
`Nussenblatt RB Salinos-Carmona
`Waksman
`BH et al mt Arch Allergy AppI
`Immunol 70289 1983
`Nussenblatt RB Dinning Wi Fujikawa LS et al
`Arch Ophthalmol 1031559 1985
`Nussenblatt RB Rodriques MM Salinas-Carmona
`MC et al Arch Ophthalmol 1001146 1982
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1011-0005
`
`

`
`INTRAOCULAR PENETRATION OF CYCLOSPORIN
`
`655
`
`Am
`
`24 Abel
`
`Boyle GL Invest Ophthatmol 15216
`
`et al Curr Eye Res
`
`Martin CL Trans Am Cot
`
`et
`
`et al
`
`Invest Oph
`
`Wihelmus KR et al Br
`
`Kane
`
`Baum
`
`Am Ophthalmol
`
`Parrier
`
`409
`
`New
`
`1978
`25 Barza
`86121 1978
`26 Diagnosing unsuspected
`errors in liquid scintilla
`tion counting Nuclear Counting Workshop Series Beck
`man Instruments mc Irvine CA 1984
`27 Gibaldi
`Pharmacokinctics
`York Marcel Delker 1982
`28 Harris JE In Leopold IH ed Symposium on
`St Louis Mosby 1968 p96
`Ocular Therapy Vol
`Patton TF Invest Ophthalmol 26584
`29 Ahmed
`1985
`30 Kaswan RL Tackett RL Martin CL et at Invest
`Ophthalmo Vis Sci 2538 1984 suppl
`31 Mosteller MW Gebhardt BM Hamilton AM et
`at Arch Ophthatmol 103101 1985
`32 Palestine AG Nussenblatt RB Chan CC Am
`Ophthalmol 99210 1985
`33 Belt TAG Hunnisett AG Br
`70852 1986
`34 Cictosporin RIA-Kit
`1984
`Ltd Basel Switzerland
`35 Wiederholt
`Kossendrup
`Invest Ophthamol 275 19 1986
`36 Nussenblatt RB Scher
`2610 1985
`37 Kaswan RL Kaplan HJ Martin CL 2nd Interna
`on Cyclosporine Washington DC Nov
`tional Congress
`
`Ophthalmol
`
`instructions for use Sandoz
`
`Schulz
`
`et
`
`Invest Ophthalmol
`
`1987
`
`Nussenblatt RB Palestine AG Chan CC et
`Ophthalmol 97790 1984
`Fite KV Pardue
`Bengston
`5787 1986
`10 Kaswan RL Kaplan
`Vet Ophthalmol 162 16 1985
`Nussenblatt RB Kuwabara
`11 Mochizuki
`Invest Ophthalmol 26226 1985
`12 Oh JO Minasi
`Grabner
`thalmol 4495 1985
`13 Hunter PA Garner
`Ophthalmol 66292 1982
`14 Bell TAG Easty DL McCullagh KG Br Oph
`thalmot 66303 1982
`15 Williams KA Grutzmacher RD Roussell Ti et
`Transplantation 29242 1985
`16 BenEzre
`Peer
`Brodsky
`10 1278 1986
`17 Kaswan RL Salisbury MA Ward DA et al
`Trans Am Co Vet Ophthalmol 18296 1987
`18 Kaswan RL Fischer CA Ward DA et at Trans
`Am Co Vet Ophthalmol 18276 1987
`Cornea 43 1985
`19 Hoffmann
`Wiederholt
`20 Boisjoly HM Wong JJ Pavan-Langston DP et al
`Arch Ophthalmot 1021804 1984
`21 Chrai SS Patton TF Mehta
`621112 1973
`22 Patton TF Pharmacol Sci 661058 1977
`23 Hulem CD Old SE Zeeznick LD et al Arch
`Ophthalmol 100646 1982
`
`Ophthalmol
`
`et
`
`Am
`
`Pharm Sci
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1011-0006

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket