throbber
Efficacy and Safety of Cyclosporin
`Ophthalmic Emulsion in the Treatment
`of Moderate-to-severe Dry Eye Disease
`
`Dose-Ranging Randomized Trial
`
`Dara Stevenson MD1 Joseph Tauber MD2 Brenda
`
`Reis PhD The Cclosporin
`
`Phase
`
`Study Group
`
`To investigate the efficacy safety formulation tolerabllty and optmal dosmg of
`novel cyclo
`Objective
`oikn-water emulsion formulation for the treatment of moderate-to-severe dry eye thsease
`sporin
`Design Randomized mufticenter double-masked paraflel-group dose-response controfled triaL
`Total enroflment 162 patients cyclosporin
`groups 129 patients vehicle group 33 patients
`Participants
`ophthalmic emulsion 005% Oi
`02% or
`Intervention
`Patients instilled study medication cyclosporin
`OA% or vehicle twice daily into both eyes for 12 weeks followed by
`4-week posttreatment observation period
`Main Outcome Measures Efficacy
`rose bengal staining superficial punctate keratitis Schirmer tear test
`symptoms of ocular discomfort and the Ocular Surface Disease Index OSDI
`measure of symptom frequency
`blood levels conjunctival
`and impact
`on vision-related
`functioning Safety biomicroscopy cyclosporin
`microbiology intraocular pressure visual acuity and monitoring of adverse events
`sicca the most significant
`Results
`subset of 90 pattunts with moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis
`In
`treatment were
`rose bengal staining superficial punctate keratits sandy or
`improvements with cyclosponn
`gritty feeling dryness and itching with improvements persisting into the posttreatment period in some treatment
`decrease in OSDI scores indicating
`groups There was also
`decrease
`the effect of ocular symptoms on
`01
`produced the most
`patients daily lives There was no clear dose-response
`relationship but cyclosporin
`005% gave the most
`and subjective end points and cyclosporin
`improvement
`consistent
`objective
`in patient symptoms The vehicle also performed well perhaps because of
`improvement
`consistent
`its long
`residence time on the ocular surface There were no significant adverse effects no microbial overgrowth and no
`increased risk of ocular infection in any treatment group The highest cyclosporin
`blood concentration detected
`was Oi
`ng/mL All treatments were well tolerated by patients
`02% and 04% were safe and well
`ophthalmic emulsions 005% Ui
`Conclusions Cyclosporin
`tolerated sgnficantly improved the ocular signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe dry eye disease and
`005% and Di
`were deemed
`decreased the effect of the disease on vsion-related functoning Cyclosporin
`the most appropriate formulations for future clinical studies because no additional benefits were observed with
`
`the higher concentrations Ophrhalmology 2000 2000 by the American Academy of Ophthal
`
`mology
`
`ey dis
`sun eys indicate that dry
`Recent population-based
`ease or keratoconjunctivitis sicca affects millions of people
`as 17% to 25% of
`\%orldnide.l8 Moreo\er
`as many
`
`Osigmally ieceised May
`January 27 2000
`ccepted
`
`1999
`
`Manuscript no 99216
`
`s1eres Hospitcl Professioncl Buildmg Nev Orleans Louisiana
`
`2Kansas City Missouri
`
`3Allergan Inc Irvine California
`
`Reprint requests to Linda Lessis 375 Anton Boulevard Suite 900 Costa
`Mesa
`92626
`
`Prelmi.inar
`
`at the annual meeting of
`results of this study
`crc presented
`Fort Lauder
`ision and Ophthalmology
`the \nsociation
`for Research in
`dale Florida May 1997 and at the LIth Coness of the Furopean SocietI
`of Ophthalniolog Budapest Hungary June 1997
`
`Supported by
`
`grant
`
`from Mlergan Inc
`
`patients visiting ophthalmic clinics report dry eye syrup
`the most common
`toms making dis eye disease one of
`complaints seen by ophthalmic specialists Patients with dis
`eve disease typically complain of syniptonis of ocular dis
`comfort
`dry gritty
`feeling often accompanied
`including
`on the duration and
`by foreign body sensation Depending
`severit of disease damage to the ocular surface may also
`have
`be present Patients wiih chronic uncontrolled dry
`and are more likeh
`an increased risk of ocular infections56
`
`to have ocular
`infections
`that progress to endophthalmitis.7
`growing body of evidence suggests that chronic dry
`result of an underlying cytokine
`and
`eye disease is the
`inflammatory process thai affects the lac
`receptor-mediated
`ritual gland acini and ducts leading to abnonnalities in the
`tear film and ultimately disrupting the homeostasis of
`the
`Most con\entional
`ocular surface.8
`treatments
`for dry
`
`2000 by the American
`
`\eademv
`
`of Ophthalmc logs
`
`Published by Else 1er Science Inc
`
`tSSN 161 n420 00
`
`see front matter
`
`967
`
`PIt SOl 61-64200000035-X
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1015-0001
`
`

`

`Ophthalmology
`
`Volume 107 Number
`
`May 2000
`
`to
`
`instill
`
`topical
`
`that
`
`eye disease focus on tear replacement or tear preservation
`these processes How es er
`and are incapable of affecting
`do
`treatment with the inimunomodulatoiy agent
`has been shown to reduce cell-mediated inflam
`sporin
`mators responses associated with inflammatory ocular sur
`face diseases.23 Preliminar
`studies has
`demonstrated
`treatment with topical
`c\closporin
`can result
`that
`in
`improvement of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease
`Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 199637Suppl
`Foulits et al
`S646 Helms ci dl
`Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 199637
`Suppi S646.24
`In addition several studies have es
`tablished the efficacy of topical cyclosporin
`in the treat
`inent of keratoconjunctis
`itis sicca in dogs
`These find
`may pros ide
`ings suggest
`topical cvclosporin
`unique opportunity to move be ond treatments
`that onh
`alleviate the symptoms of thy eye disease to therapies that
`the inflammatory processes contributing to
`effectis ely target
`disease pathogenesis
`The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy
`tolembility and oplinial dosing of
`novel
`safety patient
`oil-in-water emulsion formulalion for the
`
`crc drv eye disease with or
`
`cs closporin
`treatment of moderate-lo-ses
`
`ssithoiit Sjogrens syndrome
`
`Methods
`
`Study Protocol
`
`This report describes
`
`randomized multicenter double-masked
`study The protocol was composed
`dose-response
`paiallel-group
`12-week
`of three phases
`2-week washout phase
`treatment
`phase This study was con
`and
`4-week
`phase
`posttreatrnent
`review board regula
`ducted in compliance with the institutional
`regulations sponsor and ins estigator ob
`tiois informed consent
`and the Declaration of helsinki Written infonned
`ligations
`consent was obtamed from all patients before the inthation of an
`study medication or study-related procedure
`Patients were recruited between Ma 1995
`Study Population
`1996 from mae clinical sites throughout
`and Februars
`the United
`least 21 ears of age and had
`Stales Fhgible patients were at
`diagnosis of keratoconj unctivitis sicca with or is ithout Sj Ogren
`ndromne refractor
`to conventional management Inclusion crite
`ria included Schirmer test without anesthesia of mm/S minutes
`in at least one eye mild superficial punctate keratitis defined as
`fluorescein
`score of
`conical punctate
`in either eye
`staining
`scak
`and one or more moderate
`dis eyerelated symptoms including itching burning blurred
`vision foreign hod sensation dryness photophobia and soreness
`oi pain Both eyes were treated but both eyes were not
`included in
`all anal ses see Statistical Methods
`Patients were excluded from stud participation if
`ocular disorder including ocular injury mfection non-dry
`eye
`inflammation trauma or surgery within the prior months
`ocular
`treatment that could interfeie with in
`were receising concurrent
`terpretation of the study results had an uncontrolled sy stemnic
`lactating or con
`disease or significant illness or were pregnant
`pregnancy
`sidering
`used in this studs were
`The medications
`Study Medications
`005% 1% 2%
`umt dose vials of unpreserved
`cyclosporin
`and 0.4% ophthalmic emulsion unit dose vials of unpreserved
`and RF
`2% ophthahnic
`einulsioir
`chicle for cyclosporin
`drops Allei gan Irs inc CA The sehicle for
`FRESH lubricant ci
`
`to
`
`thes had ani
`
`968
`
`emulsion is for
`each concentration of cyclosporm
`ophthahnic
`mulated slightly dilTerently because greater oil content
`is required
`of the active ingredient The
`to dissolve the higher concentrations
`2% ophthalmic emulsion hereafter
`chicle for cyclosporin
`referred to as iehicle was chosen for the control because it was
`used
`near the middle of the range of ci closporin
`concentrations
`Study Treatments During the washout
`phase patients were
`topical ophthalmic medications
`instructed to discontinue
`use of all
`except for REFRESh
`During this time the were instructed to use
`REFRESH minmnuin of four hut no more thai eight
`times daily
`the washout
`in each eye Patients
`svho
`completed
`successfully
`phase weme then given their assigned medication cyclosporin
`0.05% 0.1% 0.2% or 0.4% ophthalmic emulsion or emulsion
`and instructed
`their medication twice
`vehicle
`daily
`morning mid evening in both eyes for 12 weeks
`The use of
`REFRESH up to eight
`times daily in each eye was allowed
`during the treatment phase
`Outome Measures The efficacy measures is eme rose bengal
`scale from
`none to
`staining graded on
`severe
`superficial punctate keratit is measured
`at nasal
`temporal pupil
`and inferior and the scores summed each graded on
`scale from
`severe Schirmer tear
`none to
`test without anesthesia
`with nasal stimnulation only if needed to determine that
`the patient
`to secrete tears symptoms of ocular discom
`had some capacity
`scale from
`fort graded by investigator quenes on
`none to
`and in patient diaries on
`scale from
`no
`very severe
`discomfort
`discomfort
`interferes with nonnal daily
`to
`that
`scale of
`none to
`activity tear film debris graded on
`ci ses crc tear breakup timne and the lrequency and amount of
`REFRESH used
`in addition patient
`response to treatment was evaluated using
`the Ocular Surface Disease Index OSDI
`ulobal assessment
`consisting of 12 questions designed to assess the symp
`parameter
`toms of ocular irritation consistent with dry cy
`disease and their
`impact on vision-related functioning The questions
`triggers and
`areas ocular sy mptoins enviromunental
`ision-related
`function Each question is as phrased in terms of frequency how
`symptom how often they experienced
`often they were aware of
`difficuhts with
`specific task because of their symptoms etc and
`never and
`all
`scale from to where
`graded on
`the
`timne Patient
`responses to all answers were then combined for
`composite OSDI score ranging from to 100
`Treatment
`safety was assessed by biomicroscopy measurement
`hema
`blood leiels
`of ciciosporin
`conjunctival microbiology
`tology and blood chemistry panels intraocular pressure by appla
`96% contiast Regan
`and visual acuity
`by
`nation
`tonometly
`the study patients were moni
`letter Acuits Chart Throughout
`tored for signs and
`mptomns of adverse ci ents and formulation
`tolerability Any reported adverse event was graded by the inves
`for severity mild moderate or severe and assessed for
`tigator
`relationship to the study treatment none unlikely possible prob
`able definite or unknown
`and 12 during the
`at weeks
`Patients were ci aluated
`phase Dining these visits patients were ci aluated hr
`treatment
`changes from baseline in Schmner tear
`test rose bengal staining
`superficial punctate keratitis scores symptoms of ocular discom
`fort biomicroscopy and visual acuity After the completion of the
`patients were also evaluated
`phase
`at posttreatment
`treatment
`and During both yisits patients were assessed for Schinuer
`weeks
`tear
`test rose bengal staining superficial punctate keratitis ocular
`symptoms of discomfort biomicroscops and visual acuity
`Whole blood was obtained from all patients for evaluation of
`and
`cyclosporm trough les els at baseline treatment
`is ceks
`week
`iveek 12 additional blood
`12 and posttreatmcnt
`At
`samples were drawn at one study site only for evaluation of peak
`For evaluation
`of
`concentrations
`cclosporin
`levels
`
`covered three
`
`trough
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1015-0002
`
`

`

`Stevenson et al Cclosporin
`
`in Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
`
`blood was drawn immediately before the morning dose of study
`medication for ci aluation of peak levels blood was drawn
`and
`hours after mstillation of the final dose of study medication
`atiseek 12
`to the Ailergan Pharmacokinetics
`Blood samples were
`sent
`ahoratory where they were assayed by
`liquid chroinatography
`spectroscopy LC-MS/MS with
`dctcc
`mass spectroscopy/mass
`ng/ml One milliliter of human blood was acidified
`lion limit of
`with ml of ft
`IIC1 solution and anal\ tes extracted unth ml
`of meth tbut ether After separation from the acidified aqueous
`NaOH
`the orgamc lai er was made basic with ml of 0.1
`lai er
`centrifuged and the organic
`The
`extract was then evaporated
`200 1il of mobile phase
`and
`dried extract was reconstituted
`11 v/in and 100 p.l was injected mto the LC-MS/MS system The
`LC-MS/MS analy sis was conducted on PE-Sciex API Ill
`quadrnpole mass spectrometer Perkm Flmer Norwalk CT cou
`system Columbma MD Chromatog
`Shimadvu HPT
`pled to
`Key stone BDS Hypersil C8 column
`raphy was performed on
`mm j.m with
`50
`ammonium
`bmars mixture of
`acetate/0.4% Ionnic acid in water mobile phase
`and mmolIl
`ammonium acctate/0.4% formic acid in acetonitrile mobile phase
`.umder gradient elution The HET
`flow rate of 300
`effluent
`j.dlmin was split with 75
`directed
`to the atmospheric
`1.d/min
`ionization soul cc The mobile phase was 60% atO to 0.5 minute
`increased linearh to 9S% at minute held at 95% from to
`2.5 minutes and then decreased to 60% at minutes held
`was used as the mternal standard
`minutel Cy closporin
`softw are PE-Sciex Instruments Con
`The PE-Sciex MacQuan
`coid Ontario Canada was used to determine
`peak areas of
`analvte and internal standard peak area ratios of analyte/internal
`concentrations of un
`standard calibration curves and calculated
`and precisiun of thc LC-MSJMS method
`knowns
`he accuracy
`was assessed within each run using quality control blood samples
`and
`ng/ml The intradar accuracy percent ratio of
`at 0.1 0.2
`observed to nommal concentration ranged flomn 100% to 109%
`with precision coefficient of iariation ranging from 3% to 10%
`The interday accuracy ranged from 102% to 11 3% with precision
`ranging between 1% and 13%
`At
`four selected study centers ocular samples for microbio
`logic evaluation were collected from the conjunctival cul de sac at
`baseline treatment week 12 and posttreatnient week
`and sent to
`laboratory for culture and organism identification
`centralized
`from subjective mea
`Statistical Methods Efficacy variables
`on both
`es were analyzed
`stmnanents with data
`collected
`by
`averaging the data from both eves Efficacy
`variables from objec
`try measurements with data collected on both eves were analy zed
`using data from the worse eye The worse eye was defined as the
`ialue and the worse
`eye with the worse Schinner
`superficial
`punctate keratitis value pupil and nasal areas only at baselme
`of patient disease profiles sub
`Because of the heterogeneity
`group analyses of patients who had various
`degrees of disease
`anali zed separately Only patients with moderate
`ser eriti
`disease at baseline were included in the efficacy
`to-severe dry ci
`analysis described in this report All patients who received studs
`medication were included
`in the analysis of safcty variables
`parameters were summarized with descriptive
`Demographic
`and frequency
`tables Efficacy
`parameter
`comparisons
`analy 7ed with the Kruskal-Wallis
`among treatment groups
`wem
`between treatment groups were ana
`test Pairw se comparisons
`lyzed with the Wilcoxon rank sum
`test Within-group changes
`froni baseline were evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank
`RLFRESII use intraocular pressure and laboratory variables were
`from
`analysis of variance Within-group changes
`analyzed
`by
`baseline were evaluated with the paired test Adverse event data
`two-sided test with
`were summarized by frequency
`tables
`005 was considered
`statmsticalh significant for all main effects
`
`triple
`
`test
`
`em
`
`statistics
`
`The null hypothesis was that
`there were no differences among
`the treatment groups with regard to changes from baseline values
`fhe alternative
`there was
`hypothesis was that
`change
`Power was calculated
`to detect an among-group difference
`in
`alues at week
`change from baseline in categon7ed Schinner tear
`For
`sample size of 12 to 15 patients in the moderate-to-severe
`standard error of0.394 and standard deviation
`subgroup analysis
`of 0.881 the power to detect
`one grade difference was 0.69
`
`Patient Treatment Assignment
`
`Qualified patients within each investigators population were as
`sigimed equally to one of the five niasked treatmnent groups sequemi
`randomization schedule geneiated by the
`to
`tially corresponding
`block of five design
`sponsor and using
`
`Study Masking
`
`All
`
`box was coded with
`
`study medications were liquids of similar appearance dis
`tw 0-com
`imit dose vials sealed
`pensed in identical
`idcntical
`identical boxes of 16
`and packed mu
`pouches
`partment plastic
`pouches each Each pouch and packing
`shipment number and the patient number
`When each box was dispensed
`the tear-off portion of the label
`was attached to the patients case report form If necessary be
`the an estigator
`serious or severe adverse es cut
`cause of
`could
`inevem sibly ummask the tear-off portion of the patient medication
`to detemmme which study medication the patiemmt had receis ed
`label
`patient care
`
`to institute appropriate
`
`Results
`
`pilot
`
`trial conducted with this new
`Because this was the first clinical
`formulation it was designed to function as
`cvclosporin
`patients who
`for future investigations Therefore
`varied
`study
`widely in the severity of their dry eye were enrolled The data from
`all patients who received
`study medication intent-to-treat popu
`lation were analyzed Howes er
`subgroup
`revealed
`analysis
`sizable population of patients who had moderate-to-severe
`dry eye
`dry eye disease was de
`disease at baselme Moderate-to-severe
`Schmnner tear test mm/S minutes at baseline in at least
`and superficial punctate keratitis pupil and nasal average
`one ey
`of 1.5 averaged oser both eyes Because these patients iepieseut
`for any dry eye tm eatment
`the
`the gm eatest
`therapeutic
`challenge
`of
`analysis presented here is confined
`to the evaluation
`This subgroup also represents
`this muoderate-to-ses crc subgroup
`the most appropriate target population for future clinical studies of
`dry eye themapeutics because these patients have sufficient main
`festations of the disease to allow the response
`to them apeutic
`inters ention to be more objectis ely evaluated Data from all pa
`tients were included
`the safety analysis
`
`fined as
`
`efficacy
`
`Participant Flow and Followup
`
`total of 162 patients was enrolled 129
`the cyclospormn
`groups and 33 in the vehicle group Table
`Eight patients were
`for administrative reasons Of the four patients dis
`discontinued
`continued because of ads erse ci emits two were in the velucle group
`one with
`and ocular burning and one with
`visual disturbance
`conjunctivitis and
`irritation dcnnatitis one was in the
`contact
`0.2% group ocular burrung and one was in the
`4% group myocardial
`infarction Only the ocular
`cy closporin
`ads cisc ci emits were considemed to be possibly or probably related
`to the study medication
`
`cyclospormn
`
`969
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1015-0003
`
`

`

`Ophthalmology
`
`Volume 107 Number
`
`May 2000
`
`Table
`
`Patient Disposition
`
`Trearrnenr
`
`tiro4
`
`Vehicle
`Cs.A005
`CsA 01cc
`CsA 0.2c
`CsA 0.4c
`
`Total
`
`Moderate-to-Severe Dry E1e Disease
`90
`
`Intent-to-Treat
`Population
`162
`Total Enrollment
`
`Completed
`
`Discontinued
`
`tomplered
`
`Discontinaed
`
`e0
`
`1000
`
`1000
`
`94.7
`
`100.0
`
`94.4
`
`97.8
`
`17
`
`18
`
`20
`
`17
`
`68
`
`00
`00
`
`5.3
`
`0.0
`
`is
`
`30
`
`30
`
`30
`
`28
`
`2.2
`
`150
`
`00
`
`099
`
`96.8
`
`9.8
`
`94.1
`
`67.5
`
`92.6
`
`12
`
`0e
`
`91
`
`32
`
`6.3
`50
`
`12
`
`7.4
`
`CsA
`
`cvclospoitn 5.
`
`Of the 90 patients with moderate-to-severe
`dD eye disease
`16
`0.05% group 19
`vi crc in the vehicle group 17 in the cyclosporin
`2%
`0.1% group 20 in the c9closporin
`the cyclosporin
`04% group One patient
`group and 18 in the
`closponn
`in the
`0.1% group was discontinued
`reasons
`for personal
`exciosporin
`04% group was discontinued
`and one patient
`in the
`closporin
`infarction same patient
`because of myocardial
`as mentioned
`earlier No patients medications
`were
`unmasked during this
`
`study
`
`Patient Demographics
`
`antibodies
`
`greater
`
`scores than
`022 and
`
`cvclosporin
`
`Significant
`
`rose bengal
`2% at all
`
`cvclosporin
`
`visits
`
`treatment vieck
`
`and 12
`
`treatment groups Significant improvements from baselme in tem
`rose bengal stainmg scores were observed Vs dli
`poral conjunctival
`1% at all
`treatment and posttrcatment
`cyclosporm
`vicits
`0.2% at week
`0.016 with
`12 and both posttreat
`closporin
`-z 0.047 with cvclosporinA 0.4% at week
`meat visits
`0.03 and with the emulsion vehicle at week 12
`0.047 Fig
`1% produced significant
`Cyclosporm
`improie
`ments in temporal conjunctival
`rose bengal staining
`0.05%
`0.006
`csclosponn
`vehicle
`04%
`0.007 at posttmeatment week
`improvements from baseline in nasal conjunctival
`observed with cyclosponn
`scores were
`staining
`0.022 with
`treatment and posttreatment
`0.1% and 0.05% at
`through
`4%
`week
`0.0311 in the cyclospormn
`posttreatment
`group at posttreatment week
`0.031 and in the vehicle
`0.025 There weie no
`treatment weeks
`group at
`in the change from baseline in
`significant among-group differences
`rose bengal staining
`nasal conjunctival
`At baselme mean
`scores for superficial punetate
`to 1.9 mall treatment groups Cclosporm AU 1%
`ranged from
`produced
`improvenient
`the greatest
`froni baseline in superficial
`and posttreat
`keratitis scores throughout
`the treatment
`meat periods range 0.9 to
`1.4 units Fig
`With the excep
`05% concentration
`treatment week
`tion of the
`12 and post-
`at
`from baseline
`irnproi ements
`significant
`superficial punctate keratitis were seen in all cyclosporin
`
`keratitis
`
`in
`
`treat
`
`punctate
`
`treatment
`
`vi eels
`
`Week
`
`Week
`
`Week
`
`12
`
`Post-Tx Wk
`
`Post-Tx Wk
`
`tO 06
`
`Cs
`
`CO
`
`Ce
`
`-itt
`
`-1.0
`
`1.2
`
`DVehcIe
`
`tCaAO05% CsAO.1% R1ICsAO.2%
`
`CsA0.4%
`
`Figure
`
`Change
`
`from baseline
`
`in temporal
`
`Cclosporin
`Signilcantly
`Significantly different from vehicle cyclosporin
`04c
`0.022
`
`different
`
`rose bengal staining CiA
`0047
`from baseline
`if
`005c and cyclosporiri
`
`fhc demographic
`of
`characteristics
`the patient population arc
`the mean patient age was approximatei5
`listed in Table
`Note that
`ears that more than 80% of patients were women and that
`58
`approximately 90% were white Approximately 32% of the pa
`tients in the moderate-to-severe dr eye group were also Sjogrens
`syndrome patients Sjogrcns syndrome was defined as the pres
`ence of one or more of the following in the blood antinuclear
`rheumatoid factor 30 international umts
`ml SjOgrens syndrome 10 112/mI or
`lU/nil anti
`bodies No significant differences were noted among the treatment
`dU eye
`groups for either the intent-to-treat or moderate-to-severe
`populations
`
`titer
`
`Efficacy Analysis
`
`At baseline mean scores for conjunctival
`rose bengal
`staining
`ranged fioin 1.2 to 20 for both temporal and nasal regions in all
`
`Table
`
`Patient Dernographmcs
`
`Moderate-to-Ses.ere
`
`Intent-to-Treat
`
`Dry Eye Disease
`90
`
`Population
`162
`
`58
`
`1SiC
`
`59 iSli8l
`
`17 189
`
`82
`
`t44t
`100
`i44
`
`26
`16
`
`145
`
`12
`
`1601
`iC40
`
`1895
`741
`0.o
`2.5
`
`120.5
`
`Age
`Mean Irange
`
`Cender 61
`Male
`
`Fcrnok
`
`Race Ci
`White
`
`Black
`
`Asian
`
`llispaoic
`
`Stôgrens syndrome in
`
`29 1i22
`
`CiA cvclosporas
`
`NA
`
`data riot available
`
`970
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1015-0004
`
`

`

`Stevenson et al
`
`Cyclosporin
`
`in Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
`
`Week
`
`12
`
`Post-Tx Wk
`
`Post-Tx Wk
`
`Week
`
`Week
`
`Week
`
`12
`
`Post-Tx Wk
`
`Post-TxWk
`
`xc
`
`cIt
`
`Is
`
`C-
`
`1.01
`
`0.5
`
`0.0
`
`-0.5
`
`-1.0
`
`1.5
`
`Vehicle
`
`PsA 0.06% CsA 1%
`
`111 CsA 0.2% in CsA 0.4%
`
`OVehiole
`
`TCsA0.05%
`
`CsAO.I% mnCsAO.2%
`
`inCsAO.4%
`
`Significantly different
`from vehicle
`
`candy different
`
`cyclosporin
`
`0.2o
`
`0.037
`
`in sandy or gritty feeling CsA yclo
`0.039
`from baseline
`
`signifi
`
`0.027
`
`significantly different
`
`from
`
`Figure
`
`Change
`
`from baseline
`
`Cyclosporiri
`
`Significantly different
`
`in superficial punctate
`from baseline
`
`keratitis CsA
`0.018
`
`Figure
`
`sporin
`
`Change
`
`from baseline
`
`ment groups at all
`time points dunng the 2-neck treatment phase
`012 and 4-neck posttrcatment period
`0.018 Sig
`fP
`keratitis was also
`impros ement
`nificant
`in superficial punctate
`observed iii patients treated with chicle at treatment weeks
`and
`12 and posttreatment week
`0.041 No statistically
`icant among-group differences
`in superficial punctate
`re observed
`values
`Baseline values for Schirmer tear
`test
`citing scores ranged
`from 24 to
`groups The most consistent
`treatment
`group with mean
`improvements were in the
`closporin
`mm at
`nun at week
`and
`increases in wetting length of
`neck 12 but
`these increases onh approached
`signifi
`seek 12
`came sseek
`The unl
`0.055
`0.05l
`significant impros emcnt
`from baseline occurred in the
`treatment week
`0.4% gmoup at
`0.008 and
`1P
`cyclosporin
`posttreatmnent week
`significant womsen
`0.023 whereas
`3.0 mm
`mg occurred in the vehicle group at week
`047
`04% produced
`025 greater
`Csclosporin
`significanth
`in Schirmer tear
`improvements from baseline
`test
`results
`than
`2% at posttreatment neck
`either vehicle or cyclosporin
`Symptoms of ocular di scom fort were evaluated from scheduled
`visit queries from the clinical
`ins estigator and from self-adminis
`tered weekl
`mptom results
`patient diaries Baseline
`suggest
`that patients may have consistently
`the seventy of
`underreported
`from the health
`their symptoms rshcn responding
`to the query
`professional compared with what
`they recorded
`Therefore onl
`symptom data from
`diaries using the
`patient
`entries inimcdiatelr before each scheduled visit are presented
`At baseline the mean score for sand or gmitt
`feeling ranged
`from .7 to
`treatment groups lhere
`mild to moderate in all
`from baseline in sands or grins
`significant improvement
`05% and 04% groups at several
`the cyclosporin
`0.039 Fig 3. At ticafinent week 12 all cyclosporin
`visits
`treatment groups had signfficantl
`impiovements in
`greater
`04 This
`sandy or gritt
`feeling than the vehicle group
`from vehicle was also seen at postlrcalment
`significant difference
`week
`05% and 0.4% groups
`0.006
`the csclosporin
`and at posttrcaflnent week
`0.05% 0.2% and
`in the cyclosporin
`week
`0.4% groups
`0.027 At posttreatment
`05% groups also demonstiuted
`0.4% and
`02% group
`than the
`closporin
`
`in all
`
`statisticall\
`
`as
`
`feeling
`
`sporin
`
`signif
`
`keratitis
`
`statistical
`
`in their diaries
`
`the cyclo
`
`significantlr
`
`imnproseinent
`
`greater
`0037
`At baseline the mean score for ocular dryness ranged from 2.3
`to 2.7 fmoderate
`to severe in all
`treatment groups Significant
`improvements from baseline in ocular dryness were seen at two or
`more time points in all cyclosporin
`the cyclo
`groups e1cept
`At posttreatment week
`0.1% group
`036 Fig
`
`sporin
`
`cyclosporin
`
`significantly greater
`
`itching
`
`0.05% 02% and 0.4% gioups all demonstrated
`inipros ements in ocular dryness than did the
`0.010
`sehicle group
`At baselme the mean score for ocular
`itching ranged from 1.4
`to 1.9 mild to moderate in all
`treatment groups Sigmficant
`improvements from baseline
`crc seen at one or
`ocular
`more time points in all of the
`0.031
`groups
`closporin
`chicle group The magnitude of improvement in the
`but not
`in the
`as larger than that
`in the velucle group at
`groups
`closporin
`time points but
`there were no statistically
`significant differ
`ences among any of the groups at any time point
`fhere were no significant within-group or betneen-group dif
`ferences in photophobia pain or burning arid stinging at an time
`point The mean scores at baselme for all
`these parameters ranged
`to mild to moderate in all
`tmeatment groups
`Baseline OSD1 scores ranged from 33 to 42 on
`scale from
`to 100 where
`indicates no disability and 100 indicates complete
`treatment groups At both treatment week 12 and
`disability in all
`week
`trend toward impmove
`there was at
`least
`posttreatment
`ment in the OSDI score in the
`clospominA 0.1% 0.2% amid 0.4%
`groups whereas there was either no change or worsening in the
`0.1% and 02%
`At seek 12 cyclospormn
`vehicle group Fig
`significantis reduced OSDI scores fP
`008 3ius decrease vias
`0.1% than with cyclo
`significantly greater with cyclosporin
`05% or 02% iP
`in 0511
`0.032 This impros ement
`period with
`scores persisted into the posttreatment
`significant
`
`all
`
`from
`
`sporin
`
`Week
`
`Wk
`
`Week
`
`12
`
`Post-Tx Wk
`
`Poet-Tx Wk
`
`0.2
`
`i.o
`
`-0.2
`
`Cs 54
`
`cx
`-t
`
`ct
`
`-0.6
`
`-1.2
`
`-1.4
`
`DVehicle CsA005% CsA0.1% tllCsAO.2%
`
`inCsAO.4%
`
`Figure
`
`Change from baseline in ocular dryness CsA tyclosporin
`0.036
`from baseline
`Significantly different
`0.010
`from vehicle
`
`significantly
`
`different
`
`971
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1015-0005
`
`

`

`Ophthalmology
`
`Volume 107 Number
`
`May 2000
`
`Week
`
`12
`
`Post-TX Wk
`
`Table
`
`Change in Ocular Microflora From Baseline to Week 12
`
`-c
`
`DVehiclo
`
`CsAO.O5% UCsAO.I% IIICsAO.2%
`
`unsAO4%i
`
`Figure
`
`Change
`
`from baseline
`
`in the OSDL CsA Cyclosporin
`0.026
`from baseline
`significandy different
`Significantly different
`0032
`02% iP
`005% and cyclosporin
`
`from cyclosporin
`
`02% group
`in the c5 closporin
`
`0.026
`0.1%
`
`seen
`
`imprueInent seen in the eclusporin
`and
`trend tow ard significance
`0.055
`group
`0.1% produced
`Only cyclosporin
`improvements
`significant
`froni baseline values in tear film debris at any time pomi neck
`005 week 12
`There were no significant
`0.03
`in tear break up time among the treatment groups
`differences
`At treatment week 12 and both posttreatment
`visits patients in
`greater nuInher of REFRESH units per
`the e1iicle group used
`day mean values week 12 4.3 units posttreatmenl week
`5.3
`week
`5.8 units than those in any of the
`units posttreatment
`treatment groups mean values week 12
`to
`cyclosporin
`units posttreatment week
`to 39 units pristtreatni ent
`to 3.7 units hutthis diflerence was not statistically
`
`eek
`
`significant
`
`Safety Analysis
`
`isit
`
`cyclosporin
`
`at
`
`Analy sis of blood saniples revealed that peak cy closporin
`levels
`were 0.16 ng/ml
`in all dosage groups Only five patients had
`blood levels
`trough that were greater
`than
`to 0.16 ng/ml
`the limit of detection
`for
`ng/ml
`lrange
`ng/ml
`the assay method No significant differences were noted in blood
`among any dosage treatment group at any
`concentrations
`Comparison of trough whole blood cyclosporm
`concentrations
`and end of the treatment period suggested
`between the begnming
`no substantial accumulation of cyciosporin
`after multiple ocular
`mstillations for 12 weeks
`No ocular
`infections occurred in any of the treatment groups at
`an time during the treatment or posttreatment
`periods and thei
`was no overgrowth of ocular microorgamsms with any of the
`trt.atments The microbial analysis found that
`the cyclosporin
`groups generally had fewer ocular microorganisms than the vehi
`of ii patients 82%
`cle group At week 12
`the chicle group
`culture posittie whereas 24 of 47 patients 51% weie
`were
`groups There was also
`culture positive in the cyclosporin
`species from 19 to 10 and total
`trt.nd for
`decrease in bacterial
`from 40 to 31 after 12 ireeks of
`strains of organisms recovered
`there was
`treatment whereas
`trend for an an
`cyclosporin
`creased numbei of bacterial
`and total
`species from to
`ii
`organisms from to 19 after vehicle treatment aphylococcus
`both at
`epdernidin was the organism most
`frequently isolated
`baseline and at week 12 Although there were changes in microbial
`flora during the treatment period in all patients analyzed changes
`in the amount or type of bacteria detected these changes were
`in all
`that
`comparable
`treatment groups suggesting
`transient
`in patients with dry eye
`ocular flora may be nommal
`changes
`disease Table
`
`972
`
`Number of Patients
`
`No Growth to
`Any Growth
`
`Any Growth to
`No Growth
`
`Change in
`Grams Stain
`
`Treatment
`
`Group
`
`Vehicle
`CsA 005%
`CsA 0100
`CsA 0.2e
`CiA 0.4e
`
`14
`
`15
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`CsA
`cyclosporin
`No growth to any growth
`bacteria at week 12
`
`Any growth to no growth
`bacteria at week 12
`
`no bacteria
`
`at baseline but
`
`the presence of
`
`presence of bacteria
`
`at baseline
`
`but no
`
`Change
`
`in Grams
`
`stain
`
`from grarn.neganve
`
`to grans.positivc or
`
`conversely
`
`total of 15 treatment-related ad erse ci ents were reported by
`The greatest
`the 162 patients in the intent-to-treat group Table
`mcidence of treatment-related ad erse events occurm ed in patients
`of 33 9.1% and the most
`in the vehicle
`group
`frequently
`of 162
`reported adverse event was superficial pruictate keratitis
`3% No deaths or serious treatment-related ad erse
`cuts oc
`curred in any patient during the study
`No
`in usual acuity or blood
`significant changes
`clinically
`cheniistjy and hematology values including liver and renal func
`tion parameters were obserued in any treatment gloup and no
`adverse ci ents related to blood chemrnstry or
`patients expenenced
`hematology Only one patient had
`clinically significant increase
`intraocular pressure from basehne defined as an mtraocular
`pressure that was within the normal range at baseline and increased
`to 25 innmtrg and that patient was in the uehicle group There
`were
`no statistically
`significant within-group or
`or chnically
`among-group changes in any biomieroscopic variables except at
`week
`group in which there was
`the vehicle
`significant increase from baselme in lid erythema
`
`statistically
`
`016
`
`Discussion
`
`The most
`important

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket