throbber
DEWS MANAGEMENT AND THERAPY
`
`IlL ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT DRY EYE ThERAPIES
`
`OUTliNE
`
`Introduction
`
`II Goals of the Management
`Subcommittee
`
`arid Therapy
`
`III Assessment of current dry eye therap3es
`
`Tear supplementation Iubncants
`
`General charactenstscs
`
`and eflècts
`
`.1
`
`Preservatives
`
`Electrolyte composaon
`
`Osmoiarity
`
`Viscosity agents
`
`Summary
`
`Teat Retention
`
`Punctal occlusion
`
`Rationale
`
`b.Types
`
`Clinical studies
`
`d1 lAdications and contraindications
`
`Compilcations
`
`Summary
`Mosture chamber spectacles
`
`Contact
`
`lenses
`
`Tear stimulation secretagogues
`
`tear substitutes
`
`Biological
`
`ISomm
`
`Sallvaiygiind autotransplantation
`
`AntWnfiarnrnatory
`
`therapy
`
`Cyclosporine
`
`Corticosteroids
`
`CliAlcal studies
`
`Basic research
`
`Tetracyclines
`
`Properties of tetra
`derivatives
`
`rnei and their
`
`Arthbactenal properties
`
`Mti4nflarnmatory
`
`Anti-anglcgenoc properties
`
`Chnccal applications
`
`of tetracycline
`
`Acne Rosacea
`
`Chronic posterior blepharitis
`meibomlanitis melbomian gland
`dysfunction
`
`Dosage aid safety
`
`Essential fatty acids
`
`Environmenta
`
`strategies
`
`IV Treatment
`
`recommendations
`
`Unanswered questions and future directions
`
`by afl subcommittee members and by the entire Dry Eye
`WorkShop membership Comments and suggested
`revi
`sions were discussed by the subcommittee members and
`incorporated into the report where deemed appropriate
`by consensus
`
`It
`
`it
`
`tests or
`
`Tear Supplementation Lubricants
`General Characteristics and Effects
`The term artificial
`tears is misnomer for most prod
`ucts that identify themselves as such because they do not
`mimic the composition of human tears Most
`function as
`formulations mimic
`lubricants although some more recent
`the electrolyte composition of human tears TheraTears
`Vision Research Woburn MA2 The ocular
`lubricants presently available in the United States are ap
`proved based on the US Food and Drug Administration
`FDA monograph on over-the-counter OTC products
`21 CFR 349 and are not based on clinical efficacy The
`specifies permitted active ingredients eg
`monograph
`demulcents emulsifiers surfactants and viscosity agents
`and concentrations
`on
`but gives only limited guidance
`inactive additives and solution parameters Certain iriac
`tive ingredients that are used in artificial
`tears sold in the
`Inc Irvine CA
`US eg castor oil
`in Endurat
`Ft Worth TX are not listed
`and guar in Systane
`in the monograph
`in an ocular
`is difficult
`to prove that any ingredient
`If there is an active in
`lubricant acts as an active agent
`is the polymeric base or viscosity agent but
`gredient
`to demonstrate This is either
`this has proved dfflcuit
`the effects or differences
`because it
`is not possible to detect
`trials with presently available clinical
`in clinical
`because the currently available agents do not have any
`lubrication effect
`discernable clinical activity beyond
`tears have demonstrated more
`Although certain artificial
`success than others in reducing symptoms of irritation
`or decreasing ocular surface dye staining in head-to-head
`there have been no large scale masked
`compansons
`trials to evaluate the wide variety of
`comparative clinical
`ocular lubricants
`What is the clinical effect of ocular lubricants or artificial
`tears Do they lubricate replace missing tear constituents
`tear film osmolarity dilute or wash out
`reduce
`elevated
`inflammatory or inflammation-inducing agents Do they
`in some instances actually wash out essential substances
`found in normal human tears These questions remain to
`tests become avail
`be answered as more sensitive clinical
`able to detect changes in the ocular surface
`The foremost objectives in caring for patients with dry
`eye disease are to improve the patienth ocular comfort and
`quality of life and to return the ocular surface and tear film
`to the normal homeostatic state Although symptoms can
`rarely be eliminated they can often be improved leading
`is more difficult
`to an improvement
`in the quality of life It
`to demonstrate that topical
`lubricants improve the ocular
`surface and the tear film abnormalities associated with dry
`eye Most clinical studies fail
`to demonstrate significant
`between symptoms and clinical
`correlation
`or between the clinical
`test values themselves.3-5 It
`is not
`dry eye with only mild symptoms to show
`rose bengal staining Until agents are developed
`significant
`that can restore the ocular surface and tear film to their
`
`unusual
`
`for
`
`test values
`
`164
`
`THE OCULAR SURFACE
`
`APRIL 2007 VOL.5 NO
`
`www theocularsurface.com
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1004-0345
`
`

`
`DEWS MANAGEMENT AND THERAPY
`
`normal homeostatic state the symptoms and signs of dry
`eye disease will continue
`Ocular
`lubricants are characterized by hypotonic or
`isotonic buffered solutions containing electrolytes surfac
`tants and various types of viscosity agents In theory the
`lubricant should be preservative-free contain
`ideal artificial
`potassium bicarbonate and other electrolytes and have
`polymeric system to increase its retention time
`Physical
`to slightly alkaline pH
`properties should include
`neutral
`Osmolarities of artificial
`tears have been measured to range
`to 354 mOsmJL9 The main variables in the
`formulation of ocular lubricants regard the concentration
`of and choice of electrolytes the osmolarity and the type
`system the presence or absence of
`of viscosity/polymeric
`preservative and if present
`the type of preservative
`
`from about
`
`Preservatives
`The single most critical advance in the treatment of dry
`eye came with the elimination of preservatives
`such as benzal
`konium chloride BAK from OTC lubricants Because
`of the risk of contamination of multidose products most
`preservative or employ some mechanism
`either contain
`The FDA has required that
`for minimizing contamination
`muitidose artificial
`tears contain preservatives to prevent
`microbial growth Preservatives
`are riot required in unit
`single use The wide
`dose vials that are discarded after
`preparations allows
`of nonpreserved
`spread availability
`lubricants more frequently without
`patients to administer
`concern about the toxic effects of preservatives For patients
`with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease the absence of
`is of more critical
`importance than the particu
`preservatives
`lar polymeric agent used in ocular lubricants The ocular
`surface inflarrirtiation associated with dry eye is exacerbated
`by preserved lubricants however nonpreserved solutions
`are inadequate in themselves to improve the surface inflarn
`se
`mation and epithelial pathology seen in dry eye
`Benzaikonium chloride is the most
`frequently used
`preservative in topical ophthalmic preparations
`as well as
`toxic effects have been
`lubricants Its epithelial
`in topical
`well established2-7 The toxicity of BAK is related to its
`concentration the frequency of dosing the level or amount
`of tear secretion and the severity of the ocular surface
`disease In the patient with mild dry eye BAK-preserved
`drops are usually well tolerated when used 4-6 times
`day
`or less in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye the
`for BAK toxicity is high due to decreased
`tear
`potential
`secretion and decreased turnover.7 Some patients may be
`using other topical preparations eg glaucoma medications
`that contain BAK increasing their exposure to the toxic
`effects of I-lAX Also the potential
`for toxicity exists with
`patient abuse of other OTC products that contain BAK
`such as vasoconstrictors
`BAK can damage the corneal and conjunctival epithe
`hum affecting cell-to-cell
`and cell shape and
`junctions
`rnicrovilli eventually leading to cell necrosis with sloughing
`of 1-2 layers of epithelial cells.7 Preservative-free formula
`for patients with severe dry
`tions are absolutely necessary
`
`eye with ocular surface disease and impairment of lacrirnal
`gland secretion or for patients on multiple preserved
`topical medications for chronic eye disease Patients with
`severe dry eye greatly reduced tear secretion and punctal
`occlusion are at particular
`risk for preservative toxicity In
`such patients the instilled agent cannot be washed out if
`this risk has not been appreciated by the clinician preserved
`drops might be used at high frequency
`Another additive used in OTC formulations is disodium
`EDTA lt augments the preservative efficacy of BAK and
`other preservatives but by itself
`is not
`sufficient pre
`servative Used in some nonpreserved solutions it may
`help limit microbial growth in opened unit-dose vials
`Although use of EDTA may allow lower concentration of
`preservative EDTA may itself be toxic to the ocular surface
`epithelium study comparing two preservative-free solu-
`tions Hypotears PP Novartis Ophthalmics East Hanover
`NJ containing EDTA and Refresh Allergan Inc Irvine
`CA without EDTA showed that both formulations had
`identical safety profiles and were completely nontoxic to
`the rabbit corneal epithelium Other studies found that
`EDTA-contairiing preparations increased corneal epithehial
`permeability920 The potential exists that patients with
`severe dry eye will find that EDTA-containing preparations
`increase irritation
`
`it
`
`single unit-dose tear substitutes are
`Nonpreserved
`to produce more
`more costly
`for the manufacturer
`costly for the patients to purchase and less convenient
`to use than bottled ocular
`lubricants For these reasons
`reciosable unit dose vials eg Refresh Free
`Inc
`Irvine CA Tears Natural Free
`Fort Worth
`TX were introduced Less toxic preservatives
`such as
`polyquad polyquaterniurn-1 sodium chlorite Purite
`and sodium perborate were developed to allow the use
`of muitidose bottled lubricants and to avoid the known
`The vanishing
`toxicity of BAlK-containing solutions.2122
`preservatives were sodium perborate and sodium chlorite
`Vision Research Woburn MAI
`TheraTears
`East 1-lanover NJ and Refresh Tears
`Genteal
`lAllergan Inc Irvine CA
`Sodium chlorite degrades to chloride ions and water
`upon exposure to UV light after instillation Sodium perbo
`rate is converted to water and oxygen on contact with the
`tear film For patients with severe dry eye even vanishing
`preservatives may not totally degrade due to decrease in
`tear volume and may be irritating
`Patients prefer bottled
`preparations for reasons of both cost and ease of use The
`lubricant would come in multidose easy--to-use
`ideal
`bottle that contains
`that completely dissipates
`preservative
`before reaching the tear film or is completely nontoxic arid
`nonirritating and maintains absolute sterility with frequent
`use One such multi-use preservative-free product has
`been introduced to the market Visine PureTears
`mc NJ
`Ocular ointments and gels are also used in treatment of
`dry eye disease Ointments are formulated with
`specific
`mixture of rumeral oil and petrolazum Some contain lanolin
`
`THE OCULAR SURFACE
`
`APRIL 2007 VOL
`
`NO
`
`www.theocuIarsurface.com
`
`165
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1004-0346
`
`

`
`DEWS MANAGEMENT ANT THERAPY
`
`which can be irritating to the eye and delay cornea wound
`heahng Individuals with sensitivity to wool may also be
`sensitive to lanolin.23 Some ointments contath paraberis as
`preservatives and these ointments are not well
`tolerated
`by patients with severe thy eye In general ointments do
`not support bacterial growth and therefore do not require
`preservatives Gels containing high molecular weight cross
`linked polymers of acrylic acid carbomers have longer
`retention times than artificial
`tear solutions but have less
`than petrolatum ointments
`
`visual blurring effect
`
`Electrolyte Composition
`Solutions containing electrolytes and or ions have been
`shown to be beneficial
`in treating ocular surface damage
`due to dry eye.6202425
`To date potassium and bicarbon
`ate seem to be the most critical Potassium is important to
`maintain cornea thickness.7
`In dry-eye rabbit model
`hypotonic tear-matched electrolyte solution TheraTears
`Vision Research Woburn MAD increased con
`junctival goblet cell density and corneal glycogen content
`and reduced tear osmolarity and rose bengal staining after
`weeks of treatment.25 The restoration of conjunctival goblet
`cells seen in the thy-eye rabbit model has been corroborated
`in patients with dry eye after LASIK28
`Bicarbonate-containing solutions promote the recovery
`of epithelial barrier ftinction in damaged comical epithelium
`and aid in maintaining normal epithelial ukrastructure
`for maintaining the mucin layer
`They may also be important
`of the tear film.6 Ocular lubricants are available that mimic
`the electrolyte composition of human tears eg TheraTears
`Advanced Vision Research Woburn MA and BION Tears
`Alcon Fort Mnth TX.2 These also contain bicarbonate
`which is critical
`for forming and maintaining the protec
`tive mucin gel
`in the stomach.27 Bicarbonate may play
`similar role for gel-forming mucins on the ocular surface
`Because bicarbonate is converted to carbon dioxide when
`in contact with air and can diffuse through the plastic unit
`dose vials foil packaging of the plastic vials is required to
`maintain stability
`
`artificial
`
`Osnrolarily
`Tears of patients with dry eye have
`tear film
`higher
`osmolarity crystalloid osmolarity than do those of normal
`patients.28.29 Elevated tear film osmolarity causes mor
`to the corneal and
`phological and biochemical
`changes
`conjunctival epithel urn8.3 and is pro-inflammatory3 This
`knowledge influenced the development of hypo-osmotic
`tears such as Hypotears 230 mOsmfL
`Ophthalmics East Hanover NJ and subsequently Thera
`Tears 181 rnOsrn/L
`Vision Research Woburn
`MA32
`Colloidal osmolality is another
`factor
`that varies in
`tear formulations While crystalloid osmolarity
`artificial
`is related to the presence of ions colloidal osmoiaiity is
`largely on macrornolecule content Colloidal
`dependent
`osmolarity also known as oncotic pressure is involved in the
`control of water transport in tissues Differences
`in colloidal
`
`osmolality affect the net water flow across membranes and
`water flow is eliminated by applying hydrostatic pressure
`to the downside of the water flow The magnitude of this
`osmotic pressure is determined by osmolality differences
`on the two sides of the membrane Epithelial cells swell
`due to damage to their cellular membranes or due to
`dysfunction in the pumping mechanism Following the
`addition of
`fluid with
`high colloidal osmolality to the
`damaged cell surface deturgescence
`occurs leading to
`return of normal cell physiology Theoretically an artificial
`tear formulation with high colloidal osmolality may be of
`value Holly and Esquivel evaluated many different artificial
`tear formulations and showed that Hypotears Novartis
`Ophthaimic.s East Hanover NJ had the highest colloidal
`osmolality of all of the formulations tested.33 Formulations
`with higher colloidal osmolality have since been marketed
`Eye Company Silverdale WAD
`Dwelle
`Protection against the adverse effects of increased os
`molarity osmoprotection has led to development of OTC
`drops incorporating compatible solutes such as glycerin
`erythritol and levocarnitine Optive
`Inc Irvine
`CA it
`is thought that the compatible solutes distribute be
`tween the tears and the intracellular fluids to protect against
`potential cellular damage from hyperosmolar
`tears.34
`
`as
`
`Viscosity Agents
`The stability of the tear film depends
`on the chemical-
`film interacting with the
`physical characteristics of that
`and cornea epithelium via the membrane
`conjunctival
`spanning mucths ie MUC 16 and MUC-4 In the classical
`the mucin layer is usually
`three-layered tear film model
`surfactant or wetting agent acting to lower
`thought of as
`tension of the relatively hydrophobic
`ocular
`the surface
`cells wet
`surface rendering the comical and conjunctival
`table.33 Currently the tear film is probably best described
`hydrated mucin gel whose mucin concentration
`decreases with distance
`from the epithelial cell surface It
`protective role similar to that of mucin in the
`may have
`stomach35 It may also serve as sink or storage vehicle
`secreted by the main and accessory lacrimal
`for substances
`glands and the ocular surface cells This may explain why
`most of the available water-containing lubricants are only
`in restoring the normal horneostasis
`minimally effective
`the ocular surface In addition to washing away and
`of
`diluting out irritating or toxic substances
`in the tear film
`lubricants hydrate gel-forming roucin While some
`patients with dry eye have decreased aqueous lacrimal gland
`secretion alterations or deficiencies involving mucin also
`cause dry eye
`Macromolecular complexes added to artificial
`lubricants
`act as viscosity agents The addition of
`viscosity agent in
`creases residence time providing
`longer interval of patient
`comfort For example when
`viscous anionic charged
`carboxymethyi-ceiluiose CIVIC 100000mw solution was
`compared with neutral hydroxyrnethylcellulose HPMC
`solution CMC was shown to have
`significantly slower rate
`of clearance from
`the eye.36 Viscous agents in active drug
`
`artificial
`
`166
`
`THE OCULAR SURFACE
`
`APRIL 2007 VOL
`
`NO
`
`www.theocu1arsurface.com
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1004-0347
`
`

`
`DEWS MANAGEMENT AND THERAPY
`
`the surface
`
`in
`formulations may also prolong ocular surface contact
`creasing the duration of action and penetration of the drug
`Viscous agents may also protect
`the ocular surface
`is known that rose bengal stains abnormal
`epithelium It
`comeal and conjunctival epithelial cells expressing an al
`tered mucin glycocalytc.37 Agents such as hydrosymethycel.
`lulose HMC which decrease rose bengal staining in thy
`eye subjects38 may either coat and protect
`epithelium or help restore the protective effect of mucins
`In the US carboxymethyl cellulose is the most corn
`moniy used polymeric viscosity agent IRI Market Share
`Data Chicago 1L typically in concentrations fmm 025%
`to 1% with differences in molecular weight also contrib
`uting to final product viscosity Carboxymethyl
`cellulose
`has been found to bind to and be retained by human epi.
`thelial cells.39 Other viscosity agents included in the FDA
`monograph in various concentrations
`include polyvinyl
`alcohol polyethylene glycol glycol 400 propylene glycol
`hydroxymethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose
`The blurring of vision and esthetic disadvantages of cak
`ing and thying on eyelashes are drawbacks of highly viscous
`agents that patients with mild to moderate dry eye will
`not
`tolerate l.ower molecular-weight
`viscous agents help
`to minimize these problems Because patient compliance
`comfort and convenience
`are important considerations
`range of tear substitute formulations with varying viscosi
`ties are needed
`Hydroxypropyl-guar HP-guar has been used as gel
`in solution containing glycol 400 and propyl
`ene glycol Systane Alcon Fort Worth TX It has been
`that HP.guar preferentially binds to the more
`suggested
`hydrophobic desiccated
`or damaged
`areas of the surface
`epithelial cells providing temporary protection for these
`cells.404 Several commercial preparations containing oil
`in
`inc Irvine CA
`the form of castor oil EnduraT
`L.ornb Rochester NY
`or mineral oil Soothe
`are purported to aid in restoring or increasing the lipid layer
`that
`of the tear film.4243 Hyaluronic acid is
`viscosity agent
`years as an active compound
`has been investigated for
`added to tear substitute formulations
`for the treatment of
`acid 0.2% has significantly
`thy eye Hyaluronic
`longer
`residence times than 0.3 percent HPMC
`ocular surface
`or 1.4 percent polyvinyl alcohol Some clinical studies
`reported improvement
`in
`dry eye in patients treated
`with sodium hyaluronate-contairting
`solutions compared
`to other
`lubricant solutions whereas others did not.48
`Although lubricant preparations containing sodium hyal
`uronate have not been approved for use in the US they are
`frequently used in some countries
`
`ling agent
`
`Swnmary
`lubricants with various viscos
`Although many topical
`ity agenis may improve symptoms and objective findings
`there is no evidence
`to another
`that any agent
`is superior
`Most clinical
`lubricant preparations
`trials involving topical
`will document some improvement but not resolution of
`subjective symptoms and improvement
`in some objective
`
`the improvements noted are not
`parameters.4 However
`necessarily any better than those seen with the vehicle or
`lubricants The elimination
`other nonpreserved artificial
`of preservatives and the development of newer
`less toxic
`preservatives have made ocular lubricants better tolerated
`lubricants which
`by dry eye patients However ocular
`have been shown to provide some protection of the ocular
`in patient symp
`surface epitheium and some improvement
`torus and objective findings have not been demonstrated
`trials to be sufficient
`in controlled clinical
`to resolve the
`ocular surface disorder and inflammation seen in most dry
`
`eye sufferers
`
`Tar Rtettkrn
`Puctat Ocdaon
`Rationdle
`While the concept of permanently occluding the lacri
`mual puncta with cautery to treat dry eye extends back 70
`years49 and although the first dissolvable implants were
`used 45 years ago5 the modem era of punctal plug use
`began in 1975 with the report by Freeman.5 Freeman de
`dumbbell-shaped silicone plug which
`scribed the use of
`rests on the opening of the punctum and extends into the
`canaliculus His report established concept of punctal oc
`clusion which opened the field for development of variety
`removable long-lasting plugs to retard tear clearance
`of
`to treat the ocular surface of patients with
`in an attempt
`tear production The Freeman style plug
`deficient aqueous
`remains the prototype for most styles of punctal plugs
`
`T3pes
`Punctal plugs are divided into two main types absorb
`able and nonabsorbable The former are made of collagen
`or polymers and last
`for variable periods of time
`days
`to months The latter nonabsorbable permanent plugs
`include the Freeman style which consists of
`surface collar
`neck and wider base In
`resting on the punctal opening
`the Herrick plug Lacrimedics
`contrast
`tee and is designed to reside within
`like
`is shaped
`golf
`the canaliculus It is blue for visualization other variations
`
`newly designed cylindrical Smartpiugm
`
`are radiopaque
`CA expands and increases
`Medermium Inc
`diameter
`in situ following insertion into the canaliculus
`due to thermodynamic properties of its hydrophilic acrylic
`composition
`
`in
`
`CThücaI SLides
`
`fall
`
`variety of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of
`punctal plugs have been reported.52 These series generally
`into Level
`II evidence Their use has been associated
`with objective and subjective improvement
`with both Sjogren and non-Sjogren aqueous
`dry eye filamentary keratitis contact
`lens intolerance
`StevensJohnson disease severe trachoma neurotrophic
`keratopathy post-penetrating keratopiast diabetic kera
`topathy and post-photorefractive
`keratectomy or laser in
`situ keratomileusis Several studies have been performed
`
`in patients
`
`tear deficient
`
`THE OCULAR SURFACE
`
`APRtL 2007 VOL
`
`NO
`
`www.theocuiarsuzface.com
`
`167
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1004-0348
`
`

`
`DEWS MANAGEMENT AND THERAPY
`
`to evaluate the effects of punctai plugs on the efficacy of
`glaucoma medications in reducing intraocular pressure
`and these studies have reported conflicting
`results.755
`Beneficial outcome in dry eye symptoms has been reported
`in 74-86% of patients treated with punctal plugs Objective
`reported with the use of punctal
`indices of improvement
`plugs include improved comeal staining prolonged tear
`film breakup time TEBUT decrease in tear osmolarity
`and increase in goblet cell density Overall the clinical util
`ity of punctal plugs in the management of dry eye disease
`has been well documented
`
`that
`
`Schirrner
`
`Indk4tions and Contindicatmas
`review on punctal plugs it was reported
`In
`recent
`in major eye clinic punctal plugs are considered
`indicated in patients who are symptomatic of dry eyes
`test with anesthesia result less than
`have
`mm at minutes and show evidence
`dye staining.55
`to the use of punctal plugs include
`Contraindications
`allergy to the materials used in the plugs to be implanted
`punctal ectropion and pre-existing riasalacrimal duct ob
`struction which would presumably negate the need for
`punctal occlusion It has been suggested
`that plugs may
`be contraindicated in dry eye patients with clinical ocular
`inflammation because occlusion of tear outflow
`surface
`would prolong contact of
`the abnormal
`tears contain
`ing proinflammatory cytokines with the ocular surface
`Treatment of
`the ocular surface inflammation prior to
`plug insertion has been recommended Acute or chronic
`infection of the lacrimal canaliculus or lacrimal sac is also
`
`of ocular surface
`
`contraindication
`
`to use of
`
`plug
`
`CopUctions
`The most common complication
`of punctal plugs is
`spontaneous plug extrusion which is particularly common
`with the Freeman-style plugs Over time an extrusion rate
`of 50% has been reported but many of these extrusions
`took place after extensive periods of plug residence Most
`for incon
`extrusions are of small consequence except
`and expense More troublesome complications
`venience
`include internal migration of plug bioflim formation and
`infection and pyogenic granulorna formation Removal of
`migrated canalicular plugs can be difficult and may require
`surgery to the nasolacrimal duct system.606
`
`Sunrnay
`The extensive literature on the use of punctal plugs in
`the management of dry eye disease has documerted their
`recent reports however
`Several
`have suggested
`utility
`that absorption of tears by the nasolacrimal ducts into sur
`rounding tissues and blood vessels may provide
`feedback
`mechanism to the lacrimal gland regulating tear produc
`tion.62 In one study placement of punctal plugs in patients
`significant decrease
`with normal tear production caused
`weeks after plug insertion.53
`in tear production for up to
`This cautionary note should be considered when deciding
`
`whether
`
`to incorporate punctal occlusion into
`disease management plan
`
`dry eye
`
`Moistnre Chambex Spectacles
`The wearing of moisture-consewing spectacles has for
`to alleviate ocular discomfort
`many years been advocated
`the level of evidence sup
`associated with dry eye However
`for dry eye treatment has been relatively
`porting its efficacy
`limited Taubota et al using
`sensitive moisture sensor
`reported an increase
`in periocular humidity in subjects
`wearing such spectacies Addition of side panels to the
`spectacles was shown to further increase the humidity65
`The clinical efficacy of moisture chamber spectacles
`has
`been reported in case reports.8567 Kurihashi proposed
`for dry eye patients in the farm of wet
`related treatment
`gauze eye mask Conversely Nichols et al recently report
`ed in their epidemiologic study that spectacle wearers were
`twice as likely as emmetropes to report dry eye disease
`The reason for this observation was not explained
`There have been several
`with relatively high
`reports
`level of evidence describing the relationship between
`environmental humidity and dry eye Korb et
`in periocular humidity caused
`increases
`significant
`increase in thickness of the tear film lipid layer.7 Dry eye
`showed significantly
`subjects wearing spectacles
`longer
`interblink intervals than those who did not wear spectacles
`and duration of blink blinking time was significantly
`longer in the latter subjects.7 Instillation of artificial
`tears
`
`reported
`
`that
`
`caused
`increase in the interblink interval and
`significant
`decrease in the blink rate.71 Maruyama et al reported that
`lens wearers
`dry eye symptoms worsened in soft contact
`when environmental humidity decreased.72
`
`corneal
`
`Contact Lenses
`lenses may help to protect and hydrate the
`Contact
`corneal surface in severe dry eye conditions Several differ
`ent contact
`lens materials and designs have been evaluated
`including silicone rubber lenses and gas permeable scieral
`lenses with or without
`fenestmtion.777
`bearing hard contact
`visual acuity and comfort decreased
`improved
`and healing of persistent cornea epithelial
`epitheliopathy
`defects have been reported.7377 Highly oxygen-permeable
`materials enable overnight wear in appropriate circum
`stances.75 There is
`small risk of corneal vascularization
`and possible corneal
`infection associated with the use of
`lenses by dry eye patients
`contact
`Tha 8dm to scretogogsn
`Several potential
`agents may
`topical pharmacologic
`secretion mucous secretion or both
`stimulate aqueous
`The agents currently under investigation by pharmaceuti
`cal companies are diquafosol one of the P212 receptor
`agonists rebamipide gefamate ecabet sodium mucous
`secretion stimulants and 15S-HETE Mud stimulant
`Among them diquafósol eye drop has been favorably
`trials 2% diquafosol 1NS365 DE-089
`evaluated in clinical
`Osaka Japan Inspire Durharn NC proved to
`
`168
`
`THE OCULAR SURFACE
`
`APRIL 2007 VOL
`
`NO
`
`www.theocuIarsurface.com
`
`FAMY CARE - EXHIBIT 1004-0349
`
`

`
`DEWS MANAGEMENT AND THERAPY
`
`be effective
`
`in the treatment of dry eye in randomized
`in humans to reduce ocular surface
`double-masked trial
`
`similar study demonstrated the ocular safety
`staining.78
`double-masked placebo-
`and tolerability of diquafosol
`in
`controlled randomized study79 This agent
`is capable of
`stimulating both aqueous and mucous secretion in animals
`and humans.803 Beneficial effects on corneal epithelial
`barrier function as well as increased
`tear secretion has
`been demonstrated in the rat dry eye rnodel Diquafosol
`also has been shown to stimulate mucin release from goblet
`cells in rabbit thy eye modei.85
`The effects of rebamipide OPC 12759 LOtsuka Rock
`vile MD Novartis
`Switer1and have been evalu
`
`ated in human clinical
`trials in animal studies rebamipide
`increased the mucin-like substances on the ocular surface
`It also bad hy
`rabbit eyes.87
`effects on UVB-induced conical
`
`trials
`
`keratocon
`
`of N-acetyicysteine-treated
`droxyl radical scavenging
`damage in mice.as
`Ecabet sodium Senju
`Japan ISTA
`CA is being evaluated in clinical
`trials internationally
`but oniy limited results have yet been published
`single
`instillation of ecabet sodium ophthalmic solution elicited
`increase in tear mucin in thy eye
`statistically significant
`Japan has been
`patients.89 Gefarnate Santen
`in animal studies Gefarnate promoted mucin
`evaluated
`injury in monkeys.9 Gefar
`production after conjunctival
`nate increased PAS-positive cell density in rabbit conjunc
`tiva and stimulated mucin-like glycoprotein stimulation
`from rat cultured conical epithelium.9192 An in viva rabbit
`similar result93
`experiment showed
`The agent 15S-HETE
`unique molecule can
`stimulate MUC1 mucin expression on ocular surface
`protected the cornea in rabbit
`epitheiium.9515S-HETE
`model of desiccation-induced
`injury probably because of
`mucin secretion.9 It has been shown to have beneficial
`effects on secretion of mucin-like glycoprotein by the rab
`bit conical epitheiiurn.97 Other laboratory studies confirni
`the stimulatory effect of 15S-HETE.98 Some of these
`agents may become useful clinical
`therapeutic modalities
`in the near future
`Two orally administered cholinergic agonists pilocar
`pine and cevilemine have been evaluated
`in clinical
`for treatment of Sjogren syndrome associated
`junctivitis sicca KCS Patients who were treated with pi
`dose of mg QID experienced
`locarpine at
`significantly
`than placebo-treated patients
`improvement
`greater overall
`in ocular problems in their ability to focus their eyes dur
`ing reading and in symptoms of blurred vision compared
`with placebo-treated patients.2 The most commonly
`from this medication was excessive
`reported side effect
`sweating which occurred in over 40% of patients Two
`percent of the patients taking pilocarpine withdrew from
`the study because of drug-related side effects Other stud
`ies have reported efficacy of pilocarpine for ocular signs
`and symptoms of Sjogren syndrome
`an increase in conjunctival goblet cell density after
`months of
`
`that
`
`Cevilemine is another oral cholinergic agonist
`was found to significantly improve symptoms of dryness
`and ocular surface
`and aqueous
`disease
`tear production
`compared to placebo when taken in doses of 15 or 30 rag
`TID.709 This agent may have fewer adverse systemic side
`effects than oral pilocarpine
`ooca Tear
`
`ttut
`
`ie nonpharmaceuticai
`Naturally occurring biological
`fluids can be used to substitute For natural rears The use
`of serum or saliva for this purpose has been reported in
`humans They are usually unpreserved When of autologous
`origin they lack antigenicity and contain various epithe
`liotrophic factors such as growth factors neurotrophins
`and extraceliular matrix
`vitamins immunoglobulins
`proteins involved in ocular surface maintenance Biologi
`cal tear substitutes maintain the morphology and support
`the proliferation of priniasy human conical epithelial cells
`tear substitutes.109 However
`than pharmaceutical
`better
`despite biomechanical
`and biochemical similarities rel
`differences compared with normal
`e.vant compositional
`tears exist and are of clinical
`Additional
`practical problems concern sterility and stability and
`surgical procedure
`labor-intensive production process or
`saliva is required to provide the natural
`the ocular surface
`
`tear substitute to
`
`Serum
`Serum is the fluid component of Full blood that remains
`after clotting Its topical use for ocular surface disease

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket